1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
End |
Next Page →
Nothing was found. Try another keyword.
Personalized Solutions. Effortless Experience. File Thru Trial ™.
Home » Thought Leadership » 5 TIPS FOR A GREAT TRIAL PRESENTATION
When you enter a courtroom, you want to believe that the person with the best argument will walk away with a verdict on their side. Although this is generally true, a great trial presentation can help sway the outcome of a case. There are a plethora of psychological studies that demonstrate that people think in pictures. So what does that mean for your trial presentation?Most importantly, it means that people will conjure up their own images unless you can provide one for them. It’s important for jurors to come away with the same information, even when your presentation has been filtered through personal beliefs and biases. Modern television has also influenced the way jurors think about the court system, and many come into court expecting photographic evidence and 3D recreations. Of course, each case is different, but the following tips can help you present compelling visual evidence at trial:
1. Be the person who does the simplification
Don’t give your audience room to draw incorrect conclusions. Although you can leave some room for interpretation when necessary, especially when you are legally unable to spell things out for the jurors, it’s still important that you are the person who connects the dots for your audience. This ensures that everyone is on the same page, and can help bring people together in agreement with you when the jury retires for deliberation.
2. Reinforce specific themes
There will be places in your presentation where you have the opportunity to make important points through your use of titles. Slide and presentation titles are much more interesting when they pose a question, make a statement, or reinforce a theme. For example, “Timeline” and “Personal History” are weak titles and underutilize one of your best opportunity for imprinting themes and posing questions. Instead, consider using a title such as “What Were John Doe’s Motivations?”, which poses a question that your audience knows you will answer. Luckily, because titles are easy to change, you’ll be able to swap things out on the fly, even if a judge objects to a title you’ve chosen.
3. Enhance your presentation by cutting the copy
Keep your bullet points short and your slides sparse. Although visual impact is an important part of your overall presentation, you should have minimal words on the page. You don’t want your audience to be distracted as they try to read ahead or catch up. Don’t read verbatim from the slides. When you keep your sentences short and simple, you also remove the temptation for yourself!
4. Assume a short attention span
Plan to lose everyone’s attention. Of course, ideally your audience would be rapt the whole time and hanging on your every point. However, it’s best to assume that you need descriptive graphics to keep people tuned in. Graphs, 3D animation, photos, sketches and other visual elements, are much more interesting than plain text.
5. Play to your audience
Finally, you should always try to play to your audience. Consider who they are, and their interests, beliefs and biases. Craft your argument with a specific type of person in mind. The jury is not made up of blank slates. You must consider what kind of evidence your audience can grasp, and provide visual images and contexts familiar to them.
When your presentation is well practiced and well structured, you’ll deliver a common visual experience for those in the courtroom. When you control the visuals, you can guide and shape the narrative to better bolster your own case. Visuals also enhance the ability of your jury to retain case facts and essential information. A great trial presentation can turn the tide of a case by crafting an overarching story that is most beneficial to your client.
For more information on trial presentations, or for help creating some of the compelling visuals we’ve discussed above, reach out to our Trial Presentation department at (800) 889-0111.
Related posts.
Just because your law firm is small, doesn’t mean it cannot be mighty. In fact, smaller teams are often more agile because they’re accustomed to
The American culture of compulsive productivity has led to unprecedented levels of burnout among working professionals. Although burnout is not exclusive to the legal industry,
What do you think of when you hear the word ‘cybersecurity’? If you’re like most legal professionals, you’re probably thinking about installing protective programs and
The FirstConnect you know and love is now even better, featuring enhanced capabilities and a streamlined interface for effortless navigation. Plus, enjoy simple, direct sign-on access to our Depositions and Records Retrieval portal, all designed with your convenience in mind.
PowerPoint presentations have long been used in the courtroom to deliver important arguments to a judge and jury. Although this technology is not new, many attorneys still struggle to use the software effectively. Without the right tools, even the strongest legal arguments may be lost on the audience.
The Basics: Know Your Screen
The type of screen on which your presentation will be displayed makes a significant difference in its visual clarity. An older pull-down screen in a courtroom may not be as easy to view as a large high-definition monitor. The lighting in the presentation environment also has a large impact on the screen.
At TrialSpectrum, Inc., our team of professionals carefully studies the location of your presentation, whether it is a large courtroom or a small conference room. This allows us to create a PowerPoint presentation that is tailored to the specific environment in which you will be presenting.
Fonts and Colors
The font type and font colors you select for your PowerPoint presentation determine whether your audience is able to read the information you are delivering. For example, did you know that sans serif fonts are usually easier on the eyes? Capitalizing every word in a block of text is also generally ineffective, and many background colors can cause many viewers’ eyes to strain. At TrialSpectrum, Inc., we know the best types of fonts and font colors to use to ensure your audience is able to read text, regardless of their age or visual acuity.
Do Not Read from the Screen
A PowerPoint presentation is a visual aid . A visual aid should support an attorney’s presentation—not be the entire presentation itself. An attorney should use a PowerPoint presentation to drive home important facts and legal arguments. If the attorney simply stands in front of a judge and jury and reads from a slide, the attorney risks these individuals becoming bored and unimpressed.
At TrialSpectrum, Inc., we will work with you to help you use a PowerPoint presentation as a supplemental tool to strengthen your legal arguments. We will help you practice and will provide tips to you to increase the effectiveness of your delivery.
Plan Your Position
Where you stand during a PowerPoint presentation is important. You want to be able to address your audience while tying your statements to the slides that are displayed. Stand too close to your audience and they may focus on you instead of the PowerPoint. If you stand too far away, the audience may become distracted.
The team of professionals at TrialSpectrum, Inc., will help you determine where you should stand to deliver your message effectively. We will also discuss body language and whether you should move about the room at all during your presentation.
A Variety of Visual Elements
One of the greatest advantages of using PowerPoint software is its ability to include a variety of visual elements into a single presentation. Attorneys are able to incorporate photos, audio clips, videos, graphics, animations, and a variety of other pieces of evidence into a single presentation. Because everyone learns information differently, a PowerPoint presentation is an excellent tool to use to ensure the audience understands both the facts of a case and the laws and regulations that may affect them.
Contact TrialSpectrum, Inc. Today to Begin Creating a PowerPoint Presentation
The team of litigation consultants and trial technology experts at TrialSpectrum, Inc., has the tools you need to elevate your legal arguments. We not only create effective PowerPoint presentations, but we also work with you to ensure you are comfortable using the software. We are available the day of your presentation as well to assist with any technological issues you may have. To learn more about our company and the services we offer, call 800-789-0084 or visit www.trialspectrum.com.
Creating a Well-Rounded Trial Strategy Using Graphics and Technology
Your Case Visualized
Trial Exhibit Boards: Are They Still Relevant?
Rules. Strategies. Preparation.
Get those three things down, and you’re gold. Learn how to do it in this course.
Know the rules, craft strong strategies, take the time to prepare, course features.
This training has helped people across the U.S. in all sorts of cases. It will help you too!
You’ll learn more about being a trial lawyer than many law students learn in 3 years!
All the right tools to make the right objections at the right time, how to craft a compelling opening statement, best strategies for persuasive and memorable closing arguments, how to present and introduce exhibits into evidence, everything you need to win your trial, works for any type of court case in any state or jurisdiction.
This one-time fee gets you unlimited access for as long as you need it. No deadline. No maintenance fees. No subscription fees.
Rules of evidence.
Will this work in my state.
Yes. The material in the course has broad application. It will help you wherever your case is, in any court in the country.
We don’t know of any other resource you can go to like this one.
If you speed through it, about 2 hours. But we recommend you take your time, an estimated 7 days. However, you have full access to the material from the moment you purchase, so you can go through it as quickly or as slowly as you like ad come back to review it later.
Yes. It contains information, instructions, examples, and explanations you will need, but it’s up to you to apply what you learn.
All the material is presented in both audio and text format. There are no videos. The reason is because we want this resource to stay cheap so that it can be made available to all. If we were to create videos, it would add to the cost…which would also put this resource out of reach of millions of people across the country.
Millions of people who have represented themselves in court lost only because they didn’t know how to win. They should have won , and they would have won… had they known how to present their case. We don’t want that to happen to you.
This topic will be an exclusive one that will provide you the answers of Word Hike Court report , appeared on level 836. This game is developed by Joy Vendor a famous one known in puzzle games for ios and android devices. From Now on, you will have all the hints, cheats and needed answers to complete this puzzle.You will have in this game to find the words from the clues in order to fulfill the board and find the words of the level. The game is new and we decided to cover it because it is a unique kind of crossword puzzle games.
PS: if you are looking for another level answers, you will find them in the below topic :
Word Hike Answers
After achieving this level, you can comeback to : Word Hike Level 836 Or get the answer of the next puzzle here : Ever dedicated I Hope you found the word you searched for.
If you have any suggestion, please feel free to comment this topic.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Abrams environmental law clinic—significant achievements for 2023-24, protecting our great lakes, rivers, and shorelines.
The Abrams Clinic represents Friends of the Chicago River and the Sierra Club in their efforts to hold Trump Tower in downtown Chicago accountable for withdrawing water illegally from the Chicago River. To cool the building, Trump Tower draws water at high volumes, similar to industrial factories or power plants, but Trump Tower operated for more than a decade without ever conducting the legally required studies to determine the impact of those operations on aquatic life or without installing sufficient equipment to protect aquatic life consistent with federal regulations. After the Clinic sent a notice of intent to sue Trump Tower, the State of Illinois filed its own case in the summer of 2018, and the Clinic moved successfully to intervene in that case. In 2023-24, motions practice and discovery continued. Working with co-counsel at Northwestern University’s Pritzker Law School’s Environmental Advocacy Center, the Clinic moved to amend its complaint to include Trump Tower’s systematic underreporting each month of the volume of water that it intakes from and discharges to the Chicago River. The Clinic and co-counsel addressed Trump Tower’s motion to dismiss some of our clients’ claims, and we filed a motion for summary judgment on our claim that Trump Tower has committed a public nuisance. We also worked closely with our expert, Dr. Peter Henderson, on a supplemental disclosure and on defending an additional deposition of him. In summer 2024, the Clinic is defending its motion for summary judgment and challenging Trump Tower’s own motion for summary judgment. The Clinic is also preparing for trial, which could take place as early as fall 2024.
Since 2016, the Abrams Clinic has worked with the Chicago chapter of the Surfrider Foundation to protect water quality along the Lake Michigan shoreline in northwest Indiana, where its members surf. In April 2017, the U. S. Steel plant in Portage, Indiana, spilled approximately 300 pounds of hexavalent chromium into Lake Michigan. In January 2018, the Abrams Clinic filed a suit on behalf of Surfrider against U. S. Steel, alleging multiple violations of U. S. Steel’s discharge permits; the City of Chicago filed suit shortly after. When the US government and the State of Indiana filed their own, separate case, the Clinic filed extensive comments on the proposed consent decree. In August 2021, the court entered a revised consent decree which included provisions advocated for by Surfrider and the City of Chicago, namely a water sampling project that alerts beachgoers as to Lake Michigan’s water quality conditions, better notifications in case of future spills, and improvements to U. S. Steel’s operations and maintenance plans. In the 2023-24 academic year, the Clinic successfully litigated its claims for attorneys’ fees as a substantially prevailing party. Significantly, the court’s order adopted the “Fitzpatrick matrix,” used by the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia to determine appropriate hourly rates for civil litigants, endorsed Chicago legal market rates as the appropriate rates for complex environmental litigation in Northwest Indiana, and allowed for partially reconstructed time records. The Clinic’s work, which has received significant media attention, helped to spawn other litigation to address pollution by other industrial facilities in Northwest Indiana and other enforcement against U. S. Steel by the State of Indiana.
In Winter Quarter 2024, Clinic students worked closely with Dr. John Ikerd, an agricultural economist and emeritus professor at the University of Missouri, to file an amicus brief in Food & Water Watch v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . In that case pending before the Ninth Circuit, Food & Water Watch argues that US EPA is illegally allowing Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, more commonly known as factory farms, to pollute waterways significantly more than is allowable under the Clean Water Act. In the brief for Dr. Ikerd and co-amici Austin Frerick, Crawford Stewardship Project, Family Farm Defenders, Farm Aid, Missouri Rural Crisis Center, National Family Farm Coalition, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, and Western Organization of Resource Councils, we argued that EPA’s refusal to regulate CAFOs effectively is an unwarranted application of “agricultural exceptionalism” to industrial agriculture and that EPA effectively distorts the animal production market by allowing CAFOs to externalize their pollution costs and diminishing the ability of family farms to compete. Attorneys for the litigants will argue the case in September 2024.
Energy justice.
The Abrams Clinic supported grassroots organizations advocating for energy justice in low-income communities and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities in Michigan. With the Clinic’s representation, these organizations intervened in cases before the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC), which regulates investor-owned utilities. Students conducted discovery, drafted written testimony, cross-examined utility executives, participated in settlement discussions, and filed briefs for these projects. The Clinic’s representation has elevated the concerns of these community organizations and forced both the utilities and regulators to consider issues of equity to an unprecedented degree. This year, on behalf of Soulardarity (Highland Park, MI), We Want Green, Too (Detroit, MI), and Urban Core Collective (Grand Rapids, MI), Clinic students engaged in eight contested cases before the MPSC against DTE Electric, DTE Gas, and Consumers Energy, as well as provided support for our clients’ advocacy in other non-contested MPSC proceedings.
The Clinic started this past fall with wins in three cases. First, the Clinic’s clients settled with DTE Electric in its Integrated Resource Plan case. The settlement included an agreement to close the second dirtiest coal power plant in Michigan three years early, $30 million from DTE’s shareholders to assist low-income customers in paying their bills, and $8 million from DTE’s shareholders toward a community fund that assists low-income customers with installing energy efficiency improvements, renewable energy, and battery technology. Second, in DTE Electric’s 2023 request for a rate hike (a “rate case”), the Commission required DTE Electric to develop a more robust environmental justice analysis and rejected the Company’s second attempt to waive consumer protections through a proposed electric utility prepayment program with a questionable history of success during its pilot run. The final Commission order and the administrative law judge’s proposal for final decision cited the Clinic’s testimony and briefs. Third, in Consumers Electric’s 2023 rate case, the Commission rejected the Company’s request for a higher ratepayer-funded return on its investments and required the Company to create a process that will enable intervenors to obtain accurate GIS data. The Clinic intends to use this data to map the disparate impact of infrastructure investment in low-income and BIPOC communities.
In the winter, the Clinic filed public comments regarding DTE Electric and Consumers Energy’s “distribution grid plans” (DGP) as well as supported interventions in two additional cases: Consumers Energy’s voluntary green pricing (VGP) case and the Clinic’s first case against the gas utility DTE Gas. Beginning with the DGP comments, the Clinic first addressed Consumers’s 2023 Electric Distribution Infrastructure Investment Plan (EDIIP), which detailed current distribution system health and the utility’s approximately $7 billion capital project planning ($2 billion of which went unaccounted for in the EDIIP) over 2023–2028. The Clinic then commented on DTE Electric’s 2023 DGP, which outlined the utility’s opaque project prioritization and planned more than $9 billion in capital investments and associated maintenance over 2024–2028. The comments targeted four areas of deficiencies in both the EDIIP and DGP: (1) inadequate consideration of distributed energy resources (DERs) as providing grid reliability, resiliency, and energy transition benefits; (2) flawed environmental justice analysis, particularly with respect to the collection of performance metrics and the narrow implementation of the Michigan Environmental Justice Screen Tool; (3) inequitable investment patterns across census tracts, with emphasis on DTE Electric’s skewed prioritization for retaining its old circuits rather than upgrading those circuits; and (4) failing to engage with community feedback.
For the VGP case against Consumers, the Clinic supported the filing of both an initial brief and reply brief requesting that the Commission reject the Company’s flawed proposal for a “community solar” program. In a prior case, the Clinic advocated for the development of a community solar program that would provide low-income, BIPOC communities with access to clean energy. As a result of our efforts, the Commission approved a settlement agreement requiring the Company “to evaluate and provide a strawman recommendation on community solar in its Voluntary Green Pricing Program.” However, the Company’s subsequent proposal in its VGP case violated the Commission’s order because it (1) was not consistent with the applicable law, MCL 460.1061; (2) was not a true community solar program; (3) lacked essential details; (4) failed to compensate subscribers sufficiently; (5) included overpriced and inflexible subscriptions; (6) excessively limited capacity; and (7) failed to provide a clear pathway for certain participants to transition into other VGP programs. For these reasons, the Clinic argued that the Commission should reject the Company’s proposal.
In DTE Gas’s current rate case, the Clinic worked with four witnesses to develop testimony that would rebut DTE Gas’s request for a rate hike on its customers. The testimony advocated for a pathway to a just energy transition that avoids dumping the costs of stranded gas assets on the low-income and BIPOC communities that are likely to be the last to electrify. Instead, the testimony proposed that the gas and electric utilities undertake integrated planning that would prioritize electric infrastructure over gas infrastructure investment to ensure that DTE Gas does not over-invest in gas infrastructure that will be rendered obsolete in the coming decades. The Clinic also worked with one expert witness to develop an analysis of DTE Gas’s unaffordable bills and inequitable shutoff, deposit, and collections practices. Lastly, the Clinic offered testimony on behalf of and from community members who would be directly impacted by the Company’s rate hike and lack of affordable and quality service. Clinic students have spent the summer drafting an approximately one-hundred-page brief making these arguments formally. We expect the Commission’s decision this fall.
Finally, both DTE Electric and Consumers Energy have filed additional requests for rate increases after the conclusion of their respective rate cases filed in 2023. On behalf of our Clients, the Clinic has intervened in these cases, and clinic students have already reviewed thousands of pages of documents and started to develop arguments and strategies to protect low-income and BIPOC communities from the utility’s ceaseless efforts to increase the cost of energy.
The Abrams Environmental Law Clinic worked with a leading international nonprofit dedicated to using the law to protect the environment to research corporate climate greenwashing, focusing on consumer protection, green financing, and securities liability. Clinic students spent the year examining an innovative state law, drafted a fifty-page guide to the statute and relevant cases, and examined how the law would apply to a variety of potential cases. Students then presented their findings in a case study and oral presentation to members of ClientEarth, including the organization’s North American head and members of its European team. The project helped identify the strengths and weaknesses of potential new strategies for increasing corporate accountability in the fight against climate change.
The Abrams Clinic continues to represent East Chicago, Indiana, residents who live or lived on or adjacent to the USS Lead Superfund site. This year, the Clinic worked closely with the East Chicago/Calumet Coalition Community Advisory Group (CAG) to advance the CAG’s advocacy beyond the Superfund site and the adjacent Dupont RCRA site. Through multiple forms of advocacy, the clinics challenged the poor performance and permit modification and renewal attempts of Tradebe Treatment and Recycling, LLC (Tradebe), a hazardous waste storage and recycling facility in the community. Clinic students sent letters to US EPA and Indiana Department of Environmental Management officials about how IDEM has failed to assess meaningful penalties against Tradebe for repeated violations of the law and how IDEM has allowed Tradebe to continue to threaten public and worker health and safety by not improving its operations. Students also drafted substantial comments for the CAG on the US EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule improvements, the Suppliers’ Park proposed cleanup, and Sims Metal’s proposed air permit revisions. The Clinic has also continued working with the CAG, environmental experts, and regulators since US EPA awarded $200,000 to the CAG for community air monitoring. The Clinic and its clients also joined comments drafted by other environmental organizations about poor operations and loose regulatory oversight of several industrial facilities in the area.
The Abrams Clinic represented the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Hoosier Environmental Council (HEC) in litigation regarding the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) failure to list the Kirtland’s snake as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. The Kirtland’s snake is a small, secretive, non-venomous snake historically located across the Midwest and the Ohio River Valley. Development and climate change have undermined large portions of the snake’s habitat, and populations are declining. Accordingly, the Clinic sued the Service in the US District Court for the District of Columbia last summer over the Service’s denial of CBD’s request to have the Kirtland’s snake protected. This spring, the Clinic was able to reach a settlement with the Service that requires the Service to reconsider its listing decision for the Kirtland’s snake and to pay attorney fees.
The Clinic also represented CBD in preparation for litigation regarding the Service’s failure to list another species as threatened or endangered. Threats from land development and climate change have devastated this species as well, and the species has already been extirpated from two of the sixteen US states in its range. As such, the Clinic worked this winter and spring to prepare a notice of intent (NOI) to sue the Service. The Team poured over hundreds of FOIA documents and dug into the Service’s supporting documentation to create strong arguments against the Service in the imminent litigation. The Clinic will send the NOI and file a complaint in the next few months.
Twenty-four law school students from the classes of 2024 and 2025 participated in the Clinic, performing complex legal research, reviewing documents obtained through discovery, drafting legal research memos and briefs, conferring with clients, conducting cross-examination, participating in settlement conferences, and arguing motions. Students secured nine clerkships, five were heading to private practice after graduation, and two are pursuing public interest work. Sam Heppell joined the Clinic from civil rights private practice, bringing the Clinic to its full complement of three attorneys.
Watch CBS News
Updated on: March 25, 2024 / 7:57 PM EDT / CBS/AP
Moscow — Four men accused of staging the Russia concert hall attack that killed more than 130 people appeared before a Moscow court Sunday showing signs of severe beatings as they faced formal terrorism charges. One appeared to be barely conscious during the hearing.
A court statement said two of the suspects accepted their guilt in the assault after being charged in the preliminary hearing, though the men's condition raised questions about whether they were speaking freely. There had been earlier conflicting reports in Russian media outlets that said three or all four men admitted culpability.
Moscow's Basmanny District Court formally charged Dalerdzhon Mirzoyev, 32; Saidakrami Rachabalizoda, 30; Shamsidin Fariduni, 25; and Mukhammadsobir Faizov, 19, with committing a group terrorist attack resulting in the death of others. The offense carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
The court ordered that the men, all of whom are citizens of Tajikistan, be held in pre-trial custody until May 22.
Along with grinding poverty, Tajikistan is rife with religious tensions. Hard-line Islamists were one of the main forces opposing the government in a 1990s civil war that devastated the country. The militants claiming responsibility for the Moscow massacre that killed 139 people — a branch of the Islamic State group in neighboring Afghanistan — reportedly recruit heavily from Tajikistan.
Russian media had reported that the men were tortured during interrogation by the security services, and Mirzoyev, Rachabalizoda and Fariduni showed signs of heavy bruising, including swollen faces.
Rachabalizoda also had a heavily bandaged ear. Russian media said Saturday that one of the suspects had his ear cut off during interrogation. The Associated Press couldn't verify the report or the videos purporting to show this.
The fourth suspect, Faizov, was brought to court from a hospital in a wheelchair and sat with his eyes closed throughout the proceedings. He was attended by medics while in court, where he wore a hospital gown and trousers and was seen with multiple cuts.
Court officials said Mirzoyev and Rachabalizoda admitted guilt for the attack after being charged.
The hearing came as Russia observed a national day of mourning of the attack Friday on the suburban Crocus City Hall concert venue that killed at least 137 people.
Rescuers continued to search the damaged building and the death toll rose as more bodies were found as family and friends of some of those still missing waited for news. Moscow's Department of Health said Sunday it had begun identifying the bodies of those killed via DNA testing, adding the process would take at least two weeks.
The attack, which has been claimed by an ISIS affiliate, is the deadliest on Russian soil in years.
Russian authorities arrested the four suspected attackers Saturday, with seven more detained on suspicion of involvement in the attack, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in an address to the nation Saturday night.
Putin appears to be trying to tie Ukraine to the attack, something its government firmly denies.
He called the attack "a bloody, barbaric terrorist act" and said Russian authorities captured the four as they were trying to escape to Ukraine through a "window" prepared for them on the Ukrainian side of the border.
A United States intelligence official told CBS News the U.S. has intelligence confirming that ISIS was responsible and U.S. intelligence has no reason to doubt those claims.
The U.S. Embassy in Russia had also previously advised Americans to stay away from concert venues because of the potential of a terrorist attack. The U.S. intelligence official confirmed to CBS News that the U.S. provided intelligence to Russia regarding the potential for an attack, under the intelligence community's Duty to Warn requirement.
"ISIS bears sole responsibility for this attack. There was no Ukrainian involvement whatsoever ," National Security Council spokeswoman Adrienne Watson said in a statement.
Russian media broadcast videos that apparently showed the detention and interrogation of the suspects, including one who told the cameras he was approached by an unidentified assistant of an Islamic preacher and paid to take part in the raid.
Putin didn't mention ISIS in his speech, and Kyiv accused him and other Russian politicians of falsely linking Ukraine to the assault to stoke fervor for Russia's war in Ukraine , which recently entered its third year.
The raid was a major embarrassment for Putin and happened just days after he cemented his grip on the country for another six years in a vote that followed the harshest crackdown on dissent since the Soviet times.
Some commentators on Russian social media questioned how authorities, who have relentlessly suppressed any opposition activities and muzzled independent media, failed to prevent the attack despite the U.S. warnings.
ISIS, which fought against Russia during its intervention in the Syrian civil war , has long targeted Russia. In a statement posted by the group's Aamaq news agency, the ISIS Afghanistan affiliate said it had attacked a large gathering of "Christians" in Krasnogorsk.
The group issued a new statement Saturday on Aamaq, saying the attack was carried out by four men who used automatic rifles, a pistol, knives and firebombs. It said the assailants fired at the crowd and used knives to kill some concertgoers, casting the raid as part of ISIS' ongoing war with countries it says are fighting against Islam.
In October 2015, a bomb planted by ISIS downed a Russian passenger plane over Sinai, killing all 224 people on board, most of them Russian vacationers returning from Egypt.
The group, which operates mainly in Syria and Iraq but also in Afghanistan and Africa, also has claimed responsibility for several attacks in Russia's volatile Caucasus and other regions in past years. It recruited fighters from Russia and other parts of the former Soviet Union.
Events at cultural institutions were canceled Sunday, flags were lowered to half staff and television entertainment and advertising were suspended, according to state news agency RIA Novosti. A steady stream of people added to a makeshift memorial near the burned-out concert hall, creating a huge mound of flowers.
"People came to a concert, some people came to relax with their families, and any one of us could have been in that situation. And I want to express my condolences to all the families that were affected here and I want to pay tribute to these people," Andrey Kondakov, one of the mourners who came to lay flowers at the memorial, told the AP.
"It is a tragedy that has affected our entire country," kindergarten employee Marina Korshunova said. "It just doesn't even make sense that small children were affected by this event." Three children were among the dead.
Igor Pogadaev was desperately seeking any details about his wife, Yana Pogadaeva, who went to the concert. The last he heard from her was when she sent him two photos from the Crocus City Hall music venue.
After Pogadaev saw the reports of gunmen opening fire on concertgoers, he rushed to the site, but couldn't find her in the numerous ambulances or among the hundreds of people who had made their way out of the venue.
"I went around, searched, I asked everyone, I showed photographs. No one saw anything, no one could say anything," Pogadaev told the AP in a video message.
He watched flames bursting out of the building as he made frantic calls to a hotline for relatives of the victims, but received no information.
As the death toll mounted Saturday, Pogodaev scoured hospitals in the Russian capital and the Moscow region, looking for information on newly admitted patients.
His wife wasn't among the 182 reported injured, nor on the list of 60 victims authorities had already identified, he said.
The Moscow Region's Emergency Situations Ministry posted a video Sunday showing equipment dismantling the damaged music venue to give rescuers access.
Report of Court Proceedings The Case of the Trotskyite-Zinovievite Terrorist Centre Heard Before the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the U.S.S.R. Accused: G.E. Zinoviev, L.B.Kamenev, G.E. Evdokimov, I.N. Smirnov, I.P. Bakayev, V.A. Ter-Vaganyan, S.V. Mrachkovsky, E.A. Dreitzer, E.S. Holtzman, I.I. Reingold, R.V. Pickel, V.P. Olberg, K.B. Berman-Yurin, Fritz David (I.I. Kruglyansky), M. Lurye and N. Lurye Charged under Articles 58 8 , 19 and 58 8 , 58 11 of the Criminal Code of the R.S.F.S.R. Trial dates: August 19-24, 1936 (Moscow) First Published: People's Commissariat of Justice of the U.S.S.R., Moscow 1936 Source: Artbin , based on ? Translated: ? Transcription/Markup: Artbin/Brian Baggins Public Domain: Soviet History Archive (marxists.org) 2005. You can freely copy, distribute, display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the source above as well as the Marxists Internet Archive. August 19 (morning session) Indictment I. The Trotskyite-Zinovievite United Terrorist Centre II. The United Trotskyite-Zinovievite Centre and the Assassination of Comrade S. M. Kirov III. Organization by the United Trotskyite-Zinovievite Centre of Terroristic Acts Against Comrades Voroshilov, Zhdanov, Kaganovich, Kossior, Orjonikidze and Postyshev Examination of the Accused Mrachkovsky Examination of the Accused Evdokimov August 19 (evening session) Examination of the Accused Dreitzer Examination of the Accused Reingold Examination of the Accused Bakayev Examination of the Accused Pickel August 20 (morning session) Examination of the Accused Kamenev Examination of the Witness Yakovlev Examination of the Accused Zinoviev Examination of the Witness Safonova August 20 (evening session) Examination of the Accused I.N. Smirnov Examination of the Accused Olberg Examination of the Accused Berman-Yurin August 21 (morning session) Examination of the Accused Holtzman Examination of the Accused N. Lurye Examination of the Accused M. Lurye Examination of the Accused Ter-Vaganyan August 21 (evening session) Examination of the Accused Fritz David (Kruglyansky) Statement by Comrade Vyshinsky, State Attorney of the U.S.S.R. August 22 (morning session) Speech for the Prosecution by Comrade A.Y. Vyshinsky, State Attorney of the U.S.S.R. The Trotskyite-Zinovievite Centre - A gang of Contemptible Terrorists Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev - Sworn Enimies of the Soviet Union Double-dealing, Deception and Provocation - The Principal Methods of the Trotskyites-Zinovievites The Counter-Revolutionary Terroristic Activities of the Trotskyites-Zinovievites are Fully Proved The Trotskyite-Zinovievite Centre Killed Comrade Kirov The Masks Are Torn From the Accused Dogs Gone Mad Should All Be Shot August 22 (evening session) Last Pleas of Mrachkovsky, Evdokimov, Dreitzer, Reingold, Bakayev and Pickel August 23 (morning session) Last Pleas of Kamenev, Zinoviev, Smirnov, Olberg, Berman-Yurin, Holtzman, N. Lurye and M. Lurye August 23 (evening session) Last Pleas of Ter-Vaganyan and Fritz David August 24 The Verdict Further Reading: Pravda's mistakes on the trial of the Zinovievites and Trotskyites , Stalin Soviet History Archive
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Word Hike Court presentation Answers: PS: if you are looking for another level answers, you will find them in the below topic : Word Hike Answers. Evidence. After achieving this level, you can comeback to : Word Hike Level 576 Or get the answer of the next puzzle here : Come out on top. I Hope you found the word you searched for.
Word Hike is the new wonderful word game developed by Joy Vendor, known by his best puzzle word games on the android and apple store. Each pack has more than 15 levels. Some of the packs are: Departures, USA, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Australia. We have also good news regarding the game: All the words were discovered by our team!
Word Hike Court presentation answer. Below you will find the Word Hike - Crossword Answers. This is a brand new word game developed by Joy Vendor. Word Hike is a themed puzzle games. You will be given a puzzle covering a specific theme and you must fill the puzzle's rows with answers. To unlock the word of every row, you must solve a clue ...
Answers of Word Hike Court presentation: Evidence; Please remember that I'll always mention the master topic of the game : Word Hike Answers, the link to the previous Clue : Checks dimensions of and the link to the main level Word Hike level 576 On A Boat. You may want to know the content of nearby topics so these links will tell you about it !
N. G. _. _. Find the complete solutions and cheats for Word Hike Trivia Puzzle Level 388 - People In Court, available on iPhone, iPad, Android, and other platforms. All solutions come with accompanying screenshots to make it easier for you to clear each level. This game is brought to you by Joy Vendor Limited.
Below you will find the Word Hike "Court report" answers. This is a brand new word game developed by Joy Vendor. Word Hike is a themed puzzle games. You will be given a puzzle covering a specific theme and you must fill the puzzle's rows with answers. To unlock the word of every row, you must solve a clue provided by the game.
PowerPoint is an incredibly sophisticated and versatile tool, one that in the right hands can also be an effective and persuasive complement to an oral presentation in the courtroom. This essay explores the current use of PowerPoint in courtroom presentations. It imagines a higher level of quality when "beauty" is considered and applied ...
E. F. T. Find the complete solutions and cheats for Word Hike Trivia Puzzle Level 1751 - In Court, available on iPhone, iPad, Android, and other platforms. All solutions come with accompanying screenshots to make it easier for you to clear each level. This game is brought to you by Joy Vendor Limited.
Skill 2. Practice, practice, practice. It's not easy to get the reason you're in court into just a few, clear, sentences. It takes practice. Thinking that you can ad lib this when the judge looks at you to speak is a big mistake. Good lawyers take lots of time to get their case into the important first few sentences.
To create useful visuals, consider the following: Focus and Objective. The most important part of creating courtroom visuals is establishing your objective. Once you can do that, you can prepare material that supports the objective in a simplified and organized manner. You don't need to go for the "wow" factor when your visuals are easily ...
Top 4 templates for legal timelines. In this post, we've gathered four of the most common types of such templates which you can use to build court presentations with strong impact on judges, jurors and arbitrators. These are: Crime Timeline Template. Court Timeline Template. Lawyer Timeline Template. Legal Timeline Template.
Every trial proceeds in basically the same way. Both parties are seated in the courtroom. In a criminal trial, this includes the prosecuting attorney for the government, as well as the defendant and their defense attorney.. In civil cases, both the plaintiff and defendant, and their respective attorneys, if any, need to be present.. The attorneys will begin by making their opening statements.
3. Enhance your presentation by cutting the copy. Keep your bullet points short and your slides sparse. Although visual impact is an important part of your overall presentation, you should have minimal words on the page. You don't want your audience to be distracted as they try to read ahead or catch up.
PowerPoint presentations have long been used in the courtroom to deliver important arguments to a judge and jury. Although this technology is not new, many attorneys still struggle to use the software effectively. Without the right tools, even the strongest legal arguments may be lost on the audience.The Basics: Know Your ScreenThe type of screen on which your presentation will be displayed ...
This training will help you: How to prepare for trial and formulate your trial strategy. The rules of evidence. How and when to apply the rules of evidence in court. How and when to object to the opposing party's evidence. How to introduce exhibits into evidence. How to prepare and present a strong opening statement.
Word Hike Court report Answers: PS: if you are looking for another level answers, you will find them in the below topic : Word Hike Answers. Testimony. After achieving this level, you can comeback to : Word Hike Level 836 Or get the answer of the next puzzle here : Ever dedicated. I Hope you found the word you searched for.
(Open Court 2023) First Grade*Sight word list by unit-use for lesson planning, assessment, tracking, hand out to parents, etc.*Slideshow of sight words, 125 slides (basic)-presented in curriculum order-add design/color to make it unique to your style-present to whole group for practice & review-...
services available through the court's self-help center. The office of the clerk of court can answer questions and give you information on court procedures. Your local domestic violence advocacy program will help you locate these and other resources. In addition, an advocate may be available to go with you to court and help with safety planning.
Steps in a Trial. Civil and Criminal Trials. While there are some differences in civil and criminal trials, the basic courtroom procedure is the same. The remaining topics in this section (see below) discuss this basic procedure, noting the differences where they occur. >>Diagram of How a Case Moves Through the Courts. >>Civil and Criminal ...
Second, in DTE Electric's 2023 request for a rate hike (a "rate case"), the Commission required DTE Electric to develop a more robust environmental justice analysis and rejected the Company's second attempt to waive consumer protections through a proposed electric utility prepayment program with a questionable history of success during ...
The court ordered that the men, all of whom are citizens of Tajikistan, be held in pre-trial custody until May 22. A man suspected of taking part in the attack of a concert hall that killed 137 ...
Trial dates: August 19-24, 1936 (Moscow) First Published: People's Commissariat of Justice of the U.S.S.R., Moscow 1936 Source: Artbin, based on ? Translated:? Transcription/Markup: Artbin/Brian Baggins Public Domain: Soviet History Archive (marxists.org) 2005. You can freely copy, distribute, display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works.
Dalerdzhon Mirzoyev, a suspect in the shooting attack at the Crocus City Hall concert venue, sits behind a glass wall of an enclosure for defendants at the Basmanny district court in Moscow, March ...
Pope Francis prays for victims of "vile" Crocus City Hall attack. Pope Francis attends the Palm Sunday Mass in the Vatican, on March 24. Pope Francis has condemned Friday's "vile" concert ...