https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.002
+1 323-425-8868 | |
+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume 11 , Article number: 1135 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
Metrics details
With advances in digital technology, physical and virtual spaces have gradually merged. For digitally disadvantaged groups, this transformation is both convenient and potentially supportive. Previous research on public infrastructure has been limited to improvements in physical facilities, and few researchers have investigated the use of mixed physical and virtual spaces. In this study, we focused on integrated virtual and physical spaces and investigated the factors affecting digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use this new infrastructure. Building on a unified theory of the acceptance and use of technology, we focused on social interaction anxiety, identified the characteristics of digitally disadvantaged groups, and constructed a research model to examine intentions to use the new infrastructure. We obtained 337 valid data from the questionnaire and analysed them using partial least squares structural equation modelling. The results showed positive relationships between performance expectancy, perceived institutional support, perceived marketplace influence, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions. The influence of psychological reactance was significantly negative. Finally, social interaction anxiety had a regulatory effect on performance expectancy, psychological reactance, perceived marketplace influence, and effort expectancy. Its effects on perceived institutional support and facilitating conditions were not significant. The results support the creation of inclusive smart cities by ensuring that the new public infrastructure is suitable for digitally disadvantaged groups. Meanwhile, this study presents new theoretical concepts of new public infrastructures, mixed physical and virtual spaces, which provides a forward-looking approach to studying digitally disadvantaged groups in this field and paves the way for subsequent scholars to explore the field in theory and literature.
Introduction.
Intelligent systems and modernisation have influenced the direction of people’s lives. With the help of continuously updated and iteratively advancing technology, modern urban construction has taken a ‘big step’ in its development. As China continues to construct smart cities, national investment in public infrastructure has steadily increased. Convenient and efficient public infrastructure has spread throughout the country, covering almost all aspects of residents’ lives and work (Guo et al. 2016 ). Previously, public infrastructure was primarily physical and located in physical spaces, but today, much of it is virtual. To achieve the goal of inclusive urban construction, the government has issued numerous relevant laws and regulations regarding public infrastructure. For example, the Chinese legislature solicited opinions from the community on the ‘Barrier-free environmental construction law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft)’.
Virtual space, based on internet technology, is a major factor in the construction of smart cities. Virtual space can be described as an interactive world built primarily on the internet (Shibusawa, 2000 ), and it has underpinned the development of national public infrastructure. In 2015, China announced its first national pilot list of smart cities, and the government began the process of building smart cities (Liu et al. 2017 ). With the continuous updating and popularisation of technologies such as the internet of things and artificial intelligence (AI) (Gu and Iop, 2020 ), virtual space is becoming widely accessible to the public. For example, in the field of government affairs, public infrastructure is now regularly developed in virtual spaces, such as on e-government platforms.
The construction of smart cities is heavily influenced by technological infrastructure (Nicolas et al. 2020 ). Currently, smart cities are being developed, and the integration of physical and virtual spaces has entered a significant stage. For example, when customers go to an offline bank to transact business, they are often asked by bank employees to use online banking software on their mobile phones, join a queue, or prove their identities. Situations such as these are neither purely virtual nor entirely physical, but in fields like banking, both options need to be considered. Therefore, we propose a new concept of mixed physical and virtual spaces in which individuals can interact, share, collaborate, coordinate with each other, and act.
Currently, new public infrastructure has emerged in mixed physical and virtual spaces, such as ‘Zheli Office’ and Alipay, in Zhejiang Province, China (as shown in Fig. 1 ). ‘Zheli Office’ is a comprehensive government application that integrates government services through digital technology, transferring some processes from offline to online and greatly improving the convenience, efficiency, and personalisation of government services. Due to its convenient payment facilities, Alipay is continuously supporting the integration of various local services, such as live payments and convenient services, and has gradually become Zhejiang’s largest living service platform. Zhejiang residents can handle almost all government and life affairs using these two applications. ‘Zheli Office’ and Alipay are key to the new public infrastructure in China, which is already leading the world in terms of a new public infrastructure that combines physical and virtual spaces; thus, China provided a valuable research context for this study.
This figure shows the new public infrastructure has emerged in mixed physical and virtual spaces.
There is no doubt that the mixing of physical and virtual spaces is a helpful trend that makes life easier for most people. However, mixed physical and virtual spaces still have a threshold for their use, which makes it difficult for some groups to use the new public infrastructure effectively. Within society, there are people whose living conditions are restricted for physiological reasons. They may be elderly people, people with disabilities, or people who lack certain abilities. According to the results of China’s seventh (2021) national population census, there are 264.02 million elderly people aged 60 years and over in China, accounting for 18.7 per cent of the total population. China is expected to have a predominantly ageing population by around 2035. In addition, according to data released by the China Disabled Persons’ Federation, the total number of people with disabilities in China is more than 85 million, which is equivalent to one person with a disability for every 16 Chinese people. In this study, we downplay the differences between these groups, focusing only on common characteristics that hinder their use of the new public infrastructure. We collectively refer to these groups as digitally disadvantaged groups who may have difficulty adapting to the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces. This gap not only makes the new public infrastructure inconvenient for these digitally disadvantaged groups, but also leads to their exclusion and isolation from the advancing digital trend.
In the current context, in which the virtual and the real mix, digitally disadvantaged groups resemble stones in a turbulent flowing river. Although they can move forward, they do so with difficulty and will eventually be left behind. Besides facing the inherent inconveniences of new public infrastructure that integrates mixed physical and virtual spaces, digitally disadvantaged groups encounter additional obstacles. Unlike the traditional public infrastructure, the new public infrastructure requires users to log on to terminals, such as mobile phones, to engage with mixed physical and virtual spaces. However, a significant proportion of digitally disadvantaged groups cannot use the new public infrastructure effectively due to economic costs or a lack of familiarity with the technology. In addition, the use of facilities in physical and virtual mixed spaces requires engagement with numerous interactive elements, which further hinders digitally disadvantaged groups with weak social or technical skills.
The United Nations (UN) has stated the creation of ‘sustainable cities and communities’ as one of its sustainable development goals, and the construction of smart cities can help achieve this goal (Blasi et al. 2022 ). Recent studies have pointed out that the spread of COVID-19 exacerbated the marginalisation of vulnerable groups, while the lack of universal service processes and virtual facilities has created significant obstacles for digitally disadvantaged groups (Narzt et al. 2016 ; C. H. J. Wang et al. 2021 ). It should be noted that smart cities result from coordinated progress between technology and society (Al-Masri et al. 2019 ). The development of society should not be at the expense of certain people, and improving inclusiveness is key to the construction of smart cities, which should rest on people-oriented development (Ji et al. 2021 ). This paper focuses on the new public infrastructure that integrates mixed physical and virtual spaces. In it, we aim to explore how improved inclusiveness can be achieved for digitally disadvantaged groups during the construction of smart cities, and we propose the following research questions:
RQ1 . In a situation where there is a mix of physical and virtual spaces, what factors affect digitally disadvantaged groups’ use of the new public infrastructure?
RQ2 . What requirements will enable digitally disadvantaged groups to participate fully in the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces?
To answer these questions, we built a research model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to explore the construction of a new public infrastructure that integrates mixed physical and virtual spaces (Venkatesh et al. 2003 ). During the research process, we focused on the attitudes, willingness, and other behavioural characteristics of digitally disadvantaged groups in relation to mixed physical and virtual spaces, aiming to ultimately provide research support for the construction of highly inclusive smart cities. Compared to existing research, this study goes further in exploring the integration and interconnection of urban public infrastructure in the process of smart city construction. We conducted empirical research to delve more deeply into the factors that influence digitally disadvantaged groups’ use of the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces. The results of this study can provide valuable guidelines and a theoretical framework for the construction of new public infrastructure and the improvement of relevant systems in mixed physical and virtual spaces. We also considered the psychological characteristics of digitally disadvantaged groups, introduced psychological reactance into the model, and used social interaction anxiety as a moderator for the model, thereby further enriching the research results regarding mixed physical and virtual spaces. This study directs social and government attention towards the issues affecting digitally disadvantaged groups in the construction of inclusive smart cities, and it has practical implications for the future digitally inclusive development of cities in China and across the world.
Theoretical background of utaut.
Currently, the theories used to explore user acceptance behaviour are mainly applied separately in the online and offline fields. Theories relating to people’s offline use behaviour include the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the theory of reasoned action (TRA). Theories used to explore users’ online use behaviour include the technology acceptance model (TAM). Unlike previous researchers, who focused on either physical or virtual space, we focused on both. This required us to consider the characteristics of both physical and virtual spaces based on a combination of user acceptance theories (TPB, TRA, and TAM) and UTAUT, which was proposed by Venkatesh et al. ( 2003 ) in 2003. These theories have mainly been used to study the factors affecting user acceptance and the application of information technology. UTAUT integrates user acceptance theories to examine eight online and offline scenarios, thereby meeting our need for a theoretical model for this study that could include both physical and virtual spaces. UTAUT includes four key factors that directly affect users’ acceptance and usage behaviours: performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, and effort expectancy. Compared to other models, UTAUT has better interpretation and prediction capabilities for user acceptance behaviour (Venkatesh et al. 2003 ). A review of previous research showed that UTAUT has mainly been used to explore usage behaviours in online environments (Hoque and Sorwar, 2017 ) and regarding technology acceptance (Heerink et al. 2010 ). Thus, UTAUT is effective for exploring acceptance and usage behaviours. We therefore based this study on the belief that UTAUT could be applied to people’s intentions to use the new public infrastructure that integrates mixed physical and virtual spaces.
In this paper, we refine and extend UTAUT based on the characteristics of digitally disadvantaged groups, and we propose a model to explore the willingness of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces. We categorised possible influences on digitally disadvantaged groups’ use of the new public infrastructure into three areas: user factors, social factors, and technical factors. Among the user factors, we explored the willingness of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure based on their performance expectancy and psychological reactance, as performance expectations are one of the UTAUT variables. To consider situations in which some users resist using new technologies due to cognitive bias, we combined (Hoque and Sorwar, 2017 ) showing that resistance among elderly people is a key factor affecting their adoption of mobile medical services with the theory of psychological reactance and introduced psychological reactance as an independent variable (Miron and Brehm, 2006 ). Among the social factors, we expanded the UTAUT social influence variable to include perceived institutional support and perceived marketplace influence. The new public infrastructure cannot be separated from the relevant government policies and the economic development status of the society in which it is constructed. Therefore, we aimed to explore the willingness of digitally disadvantaged people to use the new public infrastructure in terms of perceived institutional support and perceived marketplace influence. Among the technical factors, we explored the intentions of digitally disadvantaged groups to use new public infrastructure based on effort expectancy and facilitating conditions—both variables taken from UTAUT. In addition, considering that users with different levels of social interaction anxiety may have different levels of intention to use the new public infrastructure, we drew on research regarding the moderating role of consumer technological anxiety in adopting mobile shopping and introduced social interaction anxiety as a moderating variable (Yang and Forney, 2013 ). Believing that these modifications would further improve the interpretive ability of UTAUT, we considered it helpful to study the intentions of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure.
Many scholars have researched the factors that affect users’ willingness to use intelligent facilities, which can be broadly divided into two categories: for-profit and public welfare facilities. In the traditional business field, modern information technologies, such as the internet of things and AI, have become important means by which businesses can reduce costs and expand production. Even in traditional industries, such as agriculture (Kadylak and Cotten, 2020 ) and aquaculture (Cai et al. 2023 ), virtual technology now plays a significant role. Operators hope to use advanced technology to change traditional production and marketing models and to keep pace with new developments. However, mixed physical and virtual spaces should be inclusive for all people. Already, technological development is making it clear that no one will be able to entirely avoid mixed physical and virtual spaces. The virtualisation of public welfare facilities has gradually emerged in many areas of daily life, such as electronic health (D. D. Lee et al. 2019 ) and telemedicine (Werner and Karnieli, 2003 ). Government affairs are increasingly managed jointly in both physical and virtual spaces, resulting in an increase in e-government research (Ahn and Chen, 2022 ).
A review of the literature over the past decade showed that users’ willingness to use both for-profit and public welfare facilities is influenced by three sets of factors: user factors, social factors, and technical factors. First, regarding user factors, Bélanger and Carter ( 2008 ) pointed out that consumer trust in the government and technology are key factors affecting people’s intentions to use technology. Research on older people has shown that self-perceived ageing can have a significant impact on emotional attachment and willingness to use technology (B. A. Wang et al. 2021 ). Second, social factors include consumers’ intentions to use, which may vary significantly in different market contexts (Chiu and Hofer, 2015 ). For example, research has shown that people’s willingness to use digital healthcare tools is influenced by the attitudes of the healthcare professionals they encounter (Thapa et al. 2021 ). Third, technical factors include appropriate technical designs that help consumers use facilities more easily. Yadav et al. ( 2019 ) considered technical factors, such as ease of use, quality of service provided, and efficiency parameters, in their experiments.
The rapid development of virtual technology has inevitably drawn attention away from the physical world. Most previous researchers have focused on either virtual or physical spaces. However, scholars have noted the increasing mixing of these two spaces and have begun to study the relationships between them (Aslesen et al. 2019 ; Cocciolo, 2010 ). Wang ( 2007 ) proposed enhancing virtual environments by inserting real entities. Existing research has shown that physical and virtual spaces have begun to permeate each other in both economic and public spheres, blurring the boundaries between them (K. F. Chen et al. 2024 ; Paköz et al. 2022 ). Jakonen ( 2024 ) pointed out that, currently, with the integration of digital technologies into city building, the role of urban space in various stakeholders’ lives needs to be fully considered. The intermingling of physical and virtual spaces began to occur in people’s daily work (J. Chen et al. 2024 ) during the COVID-19 pandemic, which enhanced the integration trend (Yeung and Hao, 2024 ). The intermingling of virtual and physical spaces is a sign of social progress, but it is a considerable challenge for digitally disadvantaged people. For example, people with disabilities experience infrastructure, access, regulatory, communication, and legislative barriers when using telehealth services (Annaswamy et al. 2020 ). However, from an overall perspective, few relevant studies have considered the mixing of virtual and physical spaces.
People who are familiar with information technology, especially Generation Z, generally consider the integration of physical and virtual spaces convenient. However, for digitally disadvantaged groups, such ‘science fiction’-type changes can be disorientating and may undermine their quality of life. The elderly are an important group among the digitally disadvantaged groups referred to in this paper, and they have been the primary target of previous research on issues of inclusivity. Many researchers have considered the factors influencing older people’s willingness to use emerging technologies. For example, for the elderly, ease of use is often a prerequisite for enjoyment (Dogruel et al. 2015 ). Iancu and Iancu ( 2020 ) explored the interaction of elderly with technology, with a particular focus on mobile device design. The study emphasised that elderly people’s difficulties with technology stem from usability issues that can be addressed through improved design and appropriate training (Iancu and Iancu, 2020 ). Moreover, people with disabilities are an important group among digitally disadvantaged groups and an essential concern for the inclusive construction of cities. The rapid development of emerging technologies offers convenience to people with disabilities and has spawned many physical accessibility facilities and electronic accessibility systems (Botelho, 2021 ; Perez et al. 2023 ). Ease of use, convenience, and affordability are also key elements for enabling disadvantaged groups to use these facilities (Mogaji et al. 2023 ; Mogaji and Nguyen, 2021 ). Zander et al. ( 2023 ) explored the facilitators of and barriers to the implementation of welfare technologies for elderly people and people with disabilities. Factors such as abilities, attitudes, values, and lifestyles must be considered when planning the implementation of welfare technology for older people and people with disabilities (Zander et al. 2023 ).
In summary, scholars have conducted extensive research on the factors influencing intentions to use virtual facilities. These studies have revealed the underlying logic behind people’s adoption of virtual technology and have laid the foundations for the construction of inclusive new public infrastructure. Moreover, scholars have proposed solutions to the problems experienced by digitally disadvantaged groups in adapting to virtual facilities, but most of these scholars have focused on the elderly. Furthermore, scholars have recently conducted preliminary explorations of the mixing of physical and virtual spaces. These studies provided insights for this study, enabling us to identify both relevant background factors and current developments in the integration of virtual spaces with reality. However, most researchers have viewed the development of technology from the perspective of either virtual space or physical space, and they have rarely explored technology from the perspective of mixed physical and virtual spaces. In addition, when focusing on designs for the inclusion of digitally disadvantaged groups, scholars have mainly provided suggestions for specific practices, such as improvements in technology, hardware facilities, or device interaction interfaces, while little consideration has been given to the psychological characteristics of digitally disadvantaged groups or to the overall impact of society on these groups. Finally, in studying inclusive modernisation, researchers have generally focused on the elderly or people with disabilities, with less exploration of behavioural differences caused by factors such as social anxiety. Therefore, based on UTAUT, we explored the willingness of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces in a Chinese context (as shown in Fig. 2 ).
This figure explores the willingness of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces in a Chinese context.
User factors.
Performance expectancy is defined as the degree to which an individual believes that using a system will help him or her achieve gains in job performance (Chao, 2019 ; Venkatesh et al. 2003 ). In this paper, performance expectancy refers to the extent to which digitally disadvantaged groups obtain tangible results from the use of the new public infrastructure. Since individuals have a strong desire to improve their work performance, they have strong intentions to use systems that can improve that performance. Previous studies in various fields have confirmed the view that high performance expectancy can effectively promote individuals’ sustained intentions to use technology (Abbad, 2021 ; Chou et al. 2010 ; S. W. Lee et al. 2019 ). For example, the role of performance expectancy was verified in a study on intentions to use e-government (Zeebaree et al. 2022 ). We believe that if digitally disadvantaged groups have confidence that the new public infrastructure will help them improve their lives or work performance, even in complex environments, such as mixed physical and virtual spaces, they will have a greater willingness to use it. Therefore, we developed the following hypothesis:
H1: Performance expectancy has a positive impact on digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces.
Brehm ( 1966 ) proposed the psychological reactance theory in 1966. According to this theory, when individuals perceive that their freedom to make their own choices is under threat, a motivational state to restore that freedom is awakened (Miron and Brehm, 2006 ). Psychological reactance manifests in an individual’s intentional or unintentional resistance to external factors. Previous studies have shown that when individuals are in the process of using systems or receiving information, they may have cognitive biases that lead to erroneous interpretations of the external environment, resulting in psychological reactance (Roubroeks et al. 2010 ). Surprisingly, cognitive biases may prompt individuals to experience psychological reactance, even when offered support with helpful intentions (Tian et al. 2020 ). In this paper, we define psychological resistance as the cognitive-level or psychological-level obstacles or resistance of digitally disadvantaged groups to the new public infrastructure. This resistance may be due to digitally disadvantaged groups misunderstanding the purpose or use of the new public infrastructure. For example, they may think that the new public infrastructure will harm their self-respect or personal interests. When digitally disadvantaged groups view the new public infrastructure as a threat to their status or freedom to make their own decisions, they may develop resistance to its use. Therefore, psychological reactance cannot be ignored as an important factor potentially affecting digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure. Hence, we developed the following hypothesis:
H2: Psychological reactance has a negative impact on digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces.
In many countries, the main providers of public infrastructure are government and public institutions (Susilawati et al. 2010 ). Government decision-making is generally based on laws or government regulations (Acharya et al. 2022 ). Government decision-making procedures affect not only the builders of infrastructure, but also the intentions of users. In life, individuals and social organisations tend to abide by and maintain social norms to ensure that their behaviours are socially attractive and acceptable (Bygrave and Minniti, 2000 ; Martins et al. 2019 ). For example, national financial policies influence the marketing effectiveness of enterprises (Chen et al. 2021 ). Therefore, we believe that perceived institutional support is a key element influencing the intentions of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure. In this paper, perceived institutional support refers to digitally disadvantaged groups’ perceived policy state or government support for using the new public infrastructure, including institutional norms, laws, and regulations. Existing institutions have mainly been designed around public infrastructure that exists in physical space. We hope to explore whether perceived institutional support for digitally disadvantaged groups affects their intentions to use the new public infrastructure that integrates mixed physical and virtual spaces. Thus, we formulated the following hypothesis:
H3: Perceived institutional support has a positive impact on digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces.
Perceived marketplace influence is defined as actions or decisions that affect the market behaviour of consumers and organisations (Joshi et al. 2021 ; Leary et al. 2014 ). In this paper, perceived marketplace influence is defined as the behaviour of others using the new public infrastructure that affects the intentions of digitally disadvantaged groups to use it. Perceived marketplace influence increases consumers’ perceptions of market dynamics and their sense of control through the influence of other participants in the marketplace (Leary et al. 2019 ). Scholars have explored the impact of perceived marketplace influence on consumers’ purchase and use intentions in relation to fair trade and charity (Leary et al. 2019 ; Schneider and Leonard, 2022 ). Schneider and Leonard ( 2022 ) claimed that if consumers believe that their mask-wearing behaviour will motivate others around them to follow suit, then this belief will in turn motivate them to wear masks. Similarly, when digitally disadvantaged people see the people around them using the new public infrastructure, this creates an invisible market that influences their ability and motivation to try using the infrastructure themselves. Therefore, we developed the following hypotheses:
H4: Perceived marketplace influence has a positive impact on digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces.
Venkatesh et al. ( 2003 ) defined effort expectancy as the ease with which individuals can use a system. According to Tam et al. ( 2020 ), effort expectancy positively affects individuals’ performance expectancy and their sustained intentions to use mobile applications. In this paper, effort expectancy refers to the ease of use of the new public infrastructure for digitally disadvantaged groups: the higher the level of innovation and the more steps involved in using a facility, the poorer the user experience and the lower the utilisation rate (Venkatesh and Brown, 2001 ). A study on the use of AI devices for service delivery noted that the higher the level of anthropomorphism, the higher the cost of effort required by the customer to use a humanoid AI device (Gursoy et al. 2019 ). In mixed physical and virtual spaces, the design and use of new public infrastructure may become increasingly complex, negatively affecting the lives of digitally disadvantaged groups. We believe that the simpler the new public infrastructure, the more it will attract digitally disadvantaged groups to use it, while also enhancing their intentions to use it. Therefore, we formulated the following hypothesis:
H5: Effort expectancy has a positive impact on digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces.
Venkatesh et al. ( 2003 ) defined facilitating conditions as the degree to which an individual believes that an organisation and its technical infrastructure exist to support the use of a system. In this paper, facilitating conditions refer to the external conditions that support digitally disadvantaged groups in using the new public infrastructure, including resources, knowledge bases, skills, etc. According to Zhong et al. ( 2021 ), facilitating conditions can affect users’ attitudes towards the use of face recognition payment systems and, further, affect their intentions to use them. Moreover, scholars have shown that facilitating conditions significantly promote people’s intentions to use e-learning systems and e-government (Abbad, 2021 ; Purohit et al. 2022 ). Currently, the new public infrastructure involves mixed physical and virtual spaces, and external facilitating conditions, such as a ‘knowledge salon’ or a training session, can significantly promote digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions and willingness to the infrastructure. Therefore, we developed the following hypothesis:
H6: Facilitating conditions have a positive impact on digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure integrating a mixed physical and virtual spaces.
Magee et al. ( 1996 ) claimed that social interaction anxiety is an uncomfortable emotion that some people experience in social situations, leading to avoidance, a desire for solitude, and a fear of criticism. In this paper, social interaction anxiety refers to the worries and fears of digitally disadvantaged groups about the social interactions they will be exposed to when using the new public infrastructure. Research has confirmed that people with high levels of dissatisfaction with their own bodies are more anxious in social situations (Li Mo and Bai, 2023 ). Moreover, people with high degrees of social interaction anxiety may feel uncomfortable in front of strangers or when observed by others (Zhu and Deng, 2021 ). Digitally disadvantaged groups usually have some physiological inadequacies and may be rejected by ‘normal’ groups. Previous studies have shown that the pain caused by social exclusion is positively correlated with anxiety (Davidson et al. 2019 ). Digitally disadvantaged groups may have higher degrees of dissatisfaction with their own physical abilities, which may exacerbate any social interaction anxiety they already have. We believe that high social interaction anxiety is a common characteristic of digitally disadvantaged groups, defining them as ‘different’ from other groups.
In mixed physical and virtual spaces, if the design of the new public infrastructure is not friendly and does not help digitally disadvantaged groups use it easily, their perceived social exclusion is likely to increase, resulting in a heightened sense of anxiety. However, compared with face-to-face and offline social communication, online platforms offer convenience in terms of both communication method and duration (Ali et al. 2020 ). Therefore, people with a high degree of social interaction anxiety frequently prefer and are likely to choose online social communication (Hutchins et al. 2021 ). However, digitally disadvantaged groups may be unable to avoid social interaction by using the facilities offered in virtual spaces. Therefore, we believe that influencing factors may have different effects on intentions to use the new public infrastructure, according to the different levels of social interaction anxiety experienced. Therefore, we predicted the following:
H7: Social interaction anxiety has a moderating effect on each path.
Research background and cases.
To better demonstrate the phenomenon of the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces, we considered the cases of ‘Zheli Office’ (as shown in Fig. 3 ) and Alipay (as shown in Fig. 4 ) to explain the two areas of government affairs and daily life affairs, which greatly affect the daily lives of residents. Examining the functions of ‘Zheli Office’ and Alipay in mixed physical and virtual spaces allowed us to provide examples of the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces.
This figure shows the ‘Zheli Office’, it is a comprehensive government application that integrates government services through digital technology, transferring some processes from offline to online and greatly improving the convenience, efficiency, and personalisation of government services.
This figure shows Alipay, it supports the integration of various local services, such as live payments and convenient services, and has gradually become Zhejiang’s largest living service platform.
‘Zheli Office’ provides Zhejiang residents with a channel to handle their tax affairs. Residents who need to manage their tax affairs can choose the corresponding tax department through ‘Zheli Office’ and schedule the date and time for offline processing. Residents can also upload tax-related materials directly to ‘Zheli Office’ to submit them to the tax department for preapproval. Residents only need to present the vouchers generated by ‘Zheli Office’ to the tax department at the scheduled time to manage tax affairs and undergo final review. By mitigating long waiting times and tedious tax material review steps through the transfer of processes from physical spaces to virtual spaces, ‘Zheli Office’ greatly optimises the tax declaration process and saves residents time and effort in tax declaration.
Alipay provides residents with a channel to rent shared bicycles. Residents who want to rent bicycles can enter their personal information on Alipay in advance and provide a guarantee (an Alipay credit score or deposit payment). When renting a shared bicycle offline, residents only need to scan the QR code on the bike through Alipay to unlock and use it. When returning the bike, residents can also click the return button to automatically lock the bike and pay the fee anytime and anywhere. By automating leasing procedures and fee settlement in virtual spaces, Alipay avoids the tedious operations that residents experience when renting bicycles in physical stores.
Through the preceding two examples, we demonstrate the specific performance of the integration of virtual spaces and physical spaces. The government/life affairs of residents, such as tax declarations, certificate processing, transportation, shopping, and various other affairs, all require public infrastructure support. With the emergence of new digital trends in residents’ daily lives, mixed physical and virtual spaces have produced a public infrastructure that can support residents’ daily activities in mixed physical and virtual spaces. Due to the essential differences between public infrastructure involving mixed physical and virtual spaces and traditional physical and virtual public infrastructures, we propose a new concept—new public infrastructure. This is defined as ‘a public infrastructure that supports residents in conducting daily activities in mixed physical and virtual spaces’. It is worth noting that the new public infrastructure may encompass not only the virtual spaces provided by digital applications but also the physical spaces provided by machines capable of receiving digital messages, such as smart screens, scanners, and so forth.
The UN Sustainable Development Goal Report highlights that human society needs to build sustainable cities and communities that do not sacrifice the equality of some people. Digitally disadvantaged groups should not be excluded from the sustainable development of cities due to the increasing digitalisation trend because everyone should enjoy the convenience of the new public infrastructure provided by cities. Hence, ensuring that digitally disadvantaged groups can easily and comfortably use the new public infrastructure will help promote the construction of smart cities, making them more inclusive and universal. It will also promote the development of smart cities in a more equal and sustainable direction, ensuring that everyone can enjoy the benefits of urban development. Therefore, in this article, we emphasise the importance of digitally disadvantaged groups in the construction of sustainable smart cities. Through their participation and feedback, we can build more inclusive and sustainable smart cities in the future.
The aim of this paper was to explore the specific factors that influence the intentions of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces, and to provide a rational explanation for the role of each factor. To achieve this goal, we first reviewed numerous relevant academic papers. This formed the basis of our research assumptions and helped determine the measurement items we included. Second, we collected data through a questionnaire survey and then analysed the data using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to explore the influence of the different factors on digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure. Finally, we considered in depth the mechanisms by which the various factors influenced digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use mixed physical and virtual spaces.
We distributed a structured questionnaire to collect data for the study. To ensure the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, we based the item development on the scales used in previous studies (as shown in Appendix A). The first part of the questionnaire concerned the participants’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure. Responses to this part of the questionnaire were given on a seven-point Likert scale to measure the participants’ agreement or disagreement with various statements, with 1 indicating ‘strong disagreement’ and 7 indicating ‘strong agreement’. In addition, we designed cumulative scoring questions to measure the participants’ social interaction anxiety according to Fergus’s Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (Fergus et al. 2012 ). The second part of the questionnaire concerned the demographic characteristics of the participants, including but not limited to gender, age, and education level. Participants were informed that completing the survey was voluntary and that they had the right to refuse or withdraw at any time. They were informed that the researchers would not collect any personal information that would make it possible to identify them. Only after we had obtained the participants’ consent did we commence the questionnaire survey and data collection. Since the new public infrastructure referred to in this study was quite abstract, it was not conducive to the understanding and perceptions of digitally disadvantaged groups. Therefore, to better enable the respondents to understand our concept of the new public infrastructure, we simplified it to ‘an accessible infrastructure’ and informed them about typical cases and the relevant context of this study before they began to complete the questionnaire.
Once the questionnaire design was finalised, we conducted a pretest to ensure that the questions met the basic requirements of reliability and validity and that the participants could accurately understand the questions. In the formal questionnaire survey stage, we distributed the online questionnaire to digitally disadvantaged groups based on the principle of simple random sampling and collected data through the Questionnaire Star platform. Our sampling principle was based on the following points: first, the respondents had to belong to digitally disadvantaged groups and have experienced digital divide problems; second, they had to own at least one smart device and have access to the new public infrastructure, such as via ‘Zheli Office’ or Alipay, and third, they must have used government or daily life services on ‘Zheli Office’ or Alipay at least once in the past three months. After eliminating any invalid questionnaires, 337 valid completed questionnaires remained. The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1 . In terms of gender, 54.30% of the participants were male, and 45.70% were female. In terms of age, 64.09% of the participants were aged 18–45 years. In terms of social interaction anxiety, the data showed that 46.59% of the participants had low social interaction anxiety, and 53.41% had high social interaction anxiety.
PLS-SEM imposes few restrictions on the measurement scale, sample size, and residual distribution (Ringle et al. 2012 ). However, the environment in which the research object was located was relatively new, so we added two special variables—psychological reactance and perceived institutional support—to the model. The PLS-SEM model was considered suitable for conducting exploratory research on the newly constructed theory and research framework. Building on previous experience, the data analysis was divided into two stages: 1) the measurement model was used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the experiment, and 2) the structural model was used to test the study hypotheses by examining the relationships between the variables.
First, we tested the reliability of the model by evaluating the reliability of the constructs. As shown in Table 2 , the Cronbach’s alpha (CA) range for this study was 0.858–0.901, so both extremes were higher than the acceptable threshold (Jöreskog, 1971 ). The composite reliability (CR) scores ranged from 0.904 to 0.931; therefore, both extremes were above the threshold of 0.7 (Bagozzi and Phillips, 1982 ) (see Table 2 ).
We then assessed the validity. The test for structural validity included convergent validity and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was mainly verified by the average variance extracted (AVE) value. The recommended value for AVE is 0.5 (Kim and Park, 2013 ). In this study, the AVE values for all structures far exceeded this value (the minimum AVE value was 0.702; see Table 2 ). This result showed that the structure of this model was reliable. The Fornell–Larcker criterion is commonly used to evaluate discriminant validity; that is, the square root of the AVE should be far larger than the correlations for other constructs, meaning that each construct best explains the variance of its own construct (Hair et al. 2014 ), as shown in Table 3 . The validity of the measurement model was further evaluated by calculating the cross-loading values of the reflection construct. It can clearly be seen from Table 4 that compared with other constructs included in the structural model, the indicators of the reflection metric model had the highest loading on their potential constructs (Hair et al. 2022 ), indicating that all inspection results met the evaluation criterion for cross-loading.
In addition, we used the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations to analyse discriminant validity (Henseler et al. 2015 ). Generally, an HTMT value greater than 0.85 indicates that there are potential discriminant validity risks (Hair et al. 2022 ), but Table 5 shows that the HTMT ratios of the correlations in this study were all lower than this value (the maximum value was 0.844).
Figure 5 presents the evaluation results for the structural model for the whole sample. The R 2 value for the structural model in this study was 0.740; that is, the explanatory power of the model regarding intention to use was 74.00%. The first step was to ensure that there was no significant collinearity between the predicted value structures, otherwise there would be redundancy in the analysis (Hair et al. 2019 ). All VIF values in this study were between 1.743 and 2.869 and were therefore lower than the 3.3 threshold value for the collinearity test (Hair et al. 2022 ), which proved that the path coefficient had not deviated. This also proves that the model had a low probability of common method bias.
This figure shows the evaluation results for the structural model.
As shown in Fig. 5 , performance expectation ( β = 0.505, p < 0.001), perceived institutional support ( β = 0.338, p < 0.001), perceived marketplace influence ( β = 0.190, p < 0.001), effort expectation ( β = 0.176, p < 0.001) and facilitating conditions ( β = 0.108, p < 0.001) all had significant and positive effects on intention to use. Moreover, the results showed that the relationship between psychological reaction ( β = −0.271, p < 0.001) and intention to use was negative and significant. Therefore, all the paths in this paper, except for the moderator variables, have been verified.
To study the moderating effect between the independent variables and the dependent variables, Henseler et al. ( 2009 ) recommended using a multigroup analysis (MGA). In this study, we used MGA to analyse the moderating effect of different levels of social interaction anxiety. We designed six items for social interaction anxiety (as shown in Appendix A). According to the subjects’ responses to these six items and based on the principle of accumulation, questionnaires with scores of 6–20 indicated low social interaction anxiety, while questionnaires with scores of 28–42 indicated high social interaction anxiety. Questionnaires with scores of 21–27 were considered neutral and eliminated from the analysis involving social interaction anxiety. Based on multigroup validation factor analysis, we determined the component invariance, the configurable invariance, and the equality between compound variance and mean (Hair et al. 2019 ). As shown in Formula 1 , we used an independent sample t -test as a significance test, and a p -value below 0.05 indicated the significance of the parameters.
As shown in Table 6 , under social factors, the p -value for perceived institutional support in relation to intention to use was 0.335, which failed the significance test. This showed that there were no differences between the different degrees of social interaction anxiety. For technical factors, the p -value for facilitating conditions in relation to intention to use was 0.054, which again failed the test. This showed that there were no differences between the different levels of social interaction anxiety. However, the p -values for performance expectancy, psychological reaction, perceived marketplace influence, and effort expectancy in relation to intention to use were all less than 0.05; therefore, they passed the test for significance. This revealed that different degrees of social interaction anxiety had significant effects on these factors and that social interaction anxiety moderated some of the independent variables.
Next, we considered the path coefficients and p- values for the high and low social anxiety groups, as shown in Table 6 . First, with different levels of social anxiety, performance expectation had significantly different effects on intention to use, with low social anxiety ( β = −0.129, p = 0.394) failing the test and high social anxiety ( β = 0.202, p = 0.004) passing the test. This shows that high social anxiety levels had a greater influence of performance expectations on intention to use than low social anxiety levels. Second, psychological reactance showed significant differences in its effect on intention to use under different degrees of social anxiety, with low social anxiety ( β = 0.184, p = 0.065) failing the test and high social anxiety ( β = −0.466, p = 0.000) passing the test. Third, with different levels of social anxiety, perceived marketplace influence had significantly different effects on intention to use. Of these, perceived marketplace influence had a significant effect with low social anxiety levels ( β = 0.312, p = 0.001) but not with high social anxiety levels ( β = 0.085, p = 0.189). Finally, with differing degrees of social anxiety, expected effort had significantly different effects on intention to use. Of these, expected effort was insignificant at a low social anxiety level ( β = −0.058, p = 0.488), but it was significant at a high social anxiety level ( β = 0.326, p = 0.000). Therefore, different degrees of social interaction anxiety had significantly different effects on performance expectation, psychological reactance, perceived marketplace influence, and effort expectation.
Compared with previous studies, this study constituted a preliminary but groundbreaking exploration of mixed physical and virtual spaces. Moreover, we focused on the inclusivity problems encountered by digitally disadvantaged groups in these mixed physical and virtual spaces. We focused on performance expectancy, psychological reactance, perceived institutional support, perceived marketplace influence, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions as the six factors, with intention to use being the measure of the perceived value of the new public infrastructure. However, digitally disadvantaged groups, depending on their own characteristics or social influences, can provoke different responses from the general population in their social interactions. Therefore, we added social interaction anxiety to the model as a moderating variable, in line with the assumed psychological characteristics of digitally disadvantaged groups. The empirical results revealed a strong correlation between influencing factors and intention to use. This shows that this model has good applicability for mixed physical and virtual spaces.
According to the empirical results, performance expectancy has a significant and positive impact on intention to use, suggesting that the mixing of the virtual and the real will create usage issues and cognitive difficulties for digitally disadvantaged groups. However, if the new public infrastructure can capitalise on the advantages of blended virtual and physical spaces, it could help users build confidence in its use, which would improve their intentions to use it. Furthermore, users’ intentions to use and high social interaction anxiety are likely to be promoted by performance expectancy. In most cases, social interaction anxiety stems from self-generated avoidance, isolation, and fear of criticism (Schultz and Heimberg, 2008 ). This may result in highly anxious digitally disadvantaged groups being reluctant to engage with others when using public facilities (Mulvale et al. 2019 ; Schou and Pors, 2019 ). However, the new public infrastructure is often unattended, which could be an advantage for users with high social anxiety. Therefore, the effect of performance expectancy in promoting intentions to use would be more significant in this group.
We also found that the psychological reactance of digitally disadvantaged groups had a reverse impact on their intentions to use technology in mixed physical and virtual spaces. However, social interaction anxiety had a moderating effect on this, such that the negative effect of psychological reactance on intention to use the new public infrastructure was more pronounced in the group with high social interaction anxiety. Facilities involving social or interactive factors may make users with high social interaction anxiety think that their autonomy is, to some extent, being violated, thus triggering subconscious resistance. The communication anxiety of digitally disadvantaged groups stems not only from the new public infrastructure itself but also from the environment in which it is used (Fang et al. 2019 ). Complex, mixed physical and virtual spaces can disrupt the habits that digitally disadvantaged groups have developed in purely physical spaces, resulting in greater anxiety (Hu et al. 2022 ), while groups with high levels of social anxiety tend to remain independent because they prefer to maintain their independence. Therefore, a high degree of social interaction anxiety will induce psychological reactance towards using the new public infrastructure.
The results of this paper shed further light on the role of social factors. In particular, the relationship between perceived institutional support and intention to use reflects the fact that perceived institutional support plays a role in promoting digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure. This indicates that promotion measures need to be introduced by the government and public institutions if digitally disadvantaged groups are to accept the new public infrastructure. The development of a new public infrastructure integrating mixed physical and virtual spaces requires a high level of involvement from government institutions to facilitate the inclusive development of sustainable smart cities (Khan et al. 2020 ). An interesting finding of this study was that there were no significant differences between the effects of either high or low levels of social interaction anxiety on perceived institutional support and intention to use. This may be because social interaction anxiety mainly occurs in individuals within their close microenvironments. The policies and institutional norms of perceived institutional support tend to act at the macro level (Chen and Zhang, 2021 ; Mora et al. 2023 ), so levels of social interaction anxiety do not differ insignificantly between perceived institutional support and intentions to use the new public infrastructure.
We also found that digitally disadvantaged groups with low social interaction anxiety were more influenced by perceived marketplace influence. Consequently, they were more willing to use the new public infrastructure. When the market trend is to aggressively build a new public infrastructure, companies will accelerate their infrastructure upgrades to keep up with the trend (Hu et al. 2023 ; Liu and Zhao, 2022 ). Companies are increasingly incorporating virtual objects into familiar areas, forcing users to embrace mixed physical and virtual spaces. In addition, it is inevitable that digitally disadvantaged groups will have to use the new public infrastructure due to the market influence of people around them using this infrastructure to manage their government or life issues. When digitally disadvantaged groups with low levels of social interaction anxiety use the new public infrastructure, they are less likely to feel fearful and excluded (Kaihlanen et al. 2022 ) and will tend to be positively influenced by the use behaviours of others to use the new public infrastructure themselves (Troisi et al. 2022 ). The opposite is true for groups with high social interaction anxiety, which leads to significant differences in perceived marketplace influence and intentions to use among digitally disadvantaged groups with different levels of social interaction anxiety.
Existing mixed physical and virtual spaces exhibit exceptional technical complexity, and the results of this study affirm the importance of technical factors in affecting intentions to use. In this paper, we emphasised effort expectancy as the ease of use of the new public infrastructure (Venkatesh et al. 2003 ), which had a significant effect on digitally disadvantaged groups with high levels of social interaction anxiety but no significant effect on those with low levels of social interaction anxiety. Digitally disadvantaged groups with high levels of social interaction anxiety are likely to have a stronger sense of rejection due to environmental pressures if the new public infrastructure is too cumbersome to run or operate; they may therefore prefer using simple facilities and services. Numerous scholars have proven in educational (Hu et al. 2022 ), medical (Bai and Guo, 2022 ), business (Susanto et al. 2018 ), and other fields that good product design promotes users’ intentions to use technology (Chen et al. 2023 ). For digitally disadvantaged groups, accessible and inclusive product designs can more effectively incentivise their intentions to use the new public infrastructure (Hsu and Peng, 2022 ).
Facilitating conditions are technical factors that represent facility-related support services. The study results showed a significant positive effect of facilitating conditions on intention to use. This result is consistent with the results of previous studies regarding physical space. Professional consultation (Vinnikova et al. 2020 ) and training (Yang et al. 2023 ) on products in conventional fields can enhance users’ confidence, which can then be translated into intentions to use (Saparudin et al. 2020 ). Although the form of the new public infrastructure has changed in the direction of integration, its target object is still the user in physical space. Therefore, better facilitating conditions can enhance users’ sense of trust and promote their intentions to use (Alalwan et al. 2017 ; Mogaji et al. 2021 ). Concerning integration, because the new public infrastructure can assume multiple forms, it is difficult for digitally disadvantaged groups to know whether a particular infrastructure has good facilitating conditions. It is precisely such uncertainties that cause users with high social interaction anxiety to worry that they will be unable to use the facilities effectively. They may then worry that they will be burdened by scrutiny from strangers, causing resistance. Even when good facilitating conditions exist, groups with high social interaction anxiety do not necessarily intend to use them. Therefore, there were no significant differences between the different levels of social interaction anxiety in terms of facilitating conditions and intention to use them.
In this study, we mainly examined the factors influencing digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure consisting of mixed physical and virtual spaces. The empirical results of this paper make theoretical contributions to the inclusive construction of mixed spaces in several areas.
First, based on an understanding of urban development involving a deep integration of physical space with virtual space, we contextualise virtual space within the parameters of public infrastructure to shape the concept of a new public infrastructure. At the same time, by including the service system, the virtual community, and other non-physical factors in the realm where the virtual and the real are integrated, we form a concept of mixed physical and virtual spaces, which expands the scope of research related to virtual and physical spaces and provides new ideas for relevant future research.
Second, this paper makes a preliminary investigation of inclusion in the construction of the new public infrastructure and innovatively examines the factors that affect digitally disadvantaged groups’ willingness to use the mixed infrastructure, considering them in terms of individual, social, and technical factors. Moreover, holding that social interaction anxiety is consistent with the psychological characteristics of digitally disadvantaged groups, we introduce social interaction anxiety into the research field and distinguish between the performance of subjects with high social interaction anxiety and the performance of those with low social interaction anxiety. From the perspective of digitally disadvantaged groups, this shows the regulatory effect of social interaction anxiety on users’ psychology and behaviours. These preliminary findings may lead to greater attention being paid to digitally disadvantaged groups and prompt more studies on inclusion.
In addition, while conducting background research, we visited public welfare organisations and viewed government service lists to obtain first-hand information about digitally disadvantaged groups. Through our paper, we encourage the academic community to pay greater attention to theoretical research on digitally disadvantaged groups in the hope that deepening and broadening such research will promote the inclusion of digitally disadvantaged groups in the design of public infrastructure.
Based on a large quantity of empirical research data, we explored the digital integration factors that affect users’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure. To some extent, this provides new ideas and development directions for inclusive smart city construction. Inclusion in existing cities mainly concerns the improvement of specific technologies, but the results of this study show that technological factors are only part of the picture. The government should introduce relevant policies to promptly adapt the new public infrastructure to digitally disadvantaged groups, and the legislature should enact appropriate laws. In addition, the study results can guide the design of mixed physical and virtual spaces for the new public infrastructure. Enterprises can refer to the results of this study to identify inconveniences in their existing facilities, optimise their service processes, and improve the inclusiveness of urban institutions. Furthermore, attention should be paid to the moderating role of social interaction anxiety in the process. Inclusive urban construction should not only be physical but should closely consider the inner workings of digitally disadvantaged groups. The government and enterprises should consider the specific requirements of people with high social interaction anxiety, such as by simplifying the enquiry processes in their facilities or inserting psychological comfort measures into the processes.
Due to resource and time limitations, this paper has some shortcomings. First, we considered a broad range of digitally disadvantaged groups and conducted a forward-looking exploratory study. Since we collected data through an online questionnaire, there were restrictions on the range of volunteers who responded. Only if participants met at least one of the conditions could they be identified as members of digitally disadvantaged groups and participate in a follow-up survey. To reduce the participants’ introspection and painful recollections of their disabilities or related conditions, and to avoid expected deviations from the data obtained through the survey, we made no detailed distinction between the participants’ degrees of impairment or the reasons for impairment. We adopted a twofold experimental approach.: first, a questionnaire that was too detailed might have infringed on the participants’ privacy rights, and second, since little research has been conducted on inclusiveness in relation to mixed physical and virtual spaces, this work was pioneering. Therefore, we paid greater attention to digitally disadvantaged groups’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure. In future research, we could focus on digitally disadvantaged individuals who exhibit the same deficiencies, or further increase the sample size to investigate the participants’ intentions to use the new public infrastructure in more detail.
Second, different countries have different economic development statuses and numbers of digitally disadvantaged groups. Our study mainly concerned the willingness of digitally disadvantaged groups to use the new public infrastructure in China. Therefore, in the future, the intentions of digitally disadvantaged groups to use new public infrastructures involving mixed physical and virtual spaces can be further explored in different national contexts. Furthermore, in addition to the effects of social interaction anxiety examined in this paper, future researchers could consider other moderators associated with individual differences, such as age, familiarity with technology, and disability status. We also call for more scholars to explore digitally disadvantaged groups’ use of the new public infrastructure to promote inclusive smart city construction and sustainable social development.
Previous researchers have explored users’ intentions to use virtual technology services and have analysed the factors that influence those intentions (Akdim et al. 2022 ; Liébana-Cabanillas et al. 2020 ; Nguyen and Dao, 2024 ). However, researchers have mainly focused on single virtual or physical spaces (Scavarelli et al. 2021 ; Zhang et al. 2020 ), and the topic has rarely been discussed in relation to mixed physical and virtual spaces. In addition, previous studies have mainly considered the technology perspective (Buckingham et al. 2022 ; Carney and Kandt, 2022 ), and the influence of digitally disadvantaged groups’ psychological characteristics and the effect of the overall social environment on their intentions to use have largely been ignored. To fill this gap, we constructed a UTAUT-based model for intentions to use the new public infrastructure that involved a mixing of physical and virtual spaces. We considered the mechanisms influencing digitally disadvantaged groups’ use of the new public infrastructure, considering them from the perspectives of individual, social, and technical factors. We processed and analysed 337 valid samples using PLS-SEM. The results showed that there were significant correlations between the six user factor variables and intention to use the new public infrastructure. In addition, for digitally disadvantaged groups, different degrees of social interaction anxiety had significantly different effects on the impacts of performance expectancy, psychological reactance, perceived marketplace influence, and effort expectancy on intention to use, while there were no differences in the impacts of perceived institutional support and facilitating conditions on intention to use.
In the theoretical value, we build on previous scholarly research on the conceptualisation of new public infrastructures, mixed physical and virtual spaces (Aslesen et al. 2019 ; Cocciolo, 2010 ), arguing for user, social and technological dimensions influencing the use of new public infrastructures by digitally disadvantaged groups in mixed physical and virtual spaces, and for the moderating role of social interaction anxiety. Meanwhile, this study prospectively explores the new phenomenon of digitally disadvantaged groups using new public infrastructures in mixed physical and virtual spaces, which paves the way for future scholars to explore the field both in theory and literature. In the practical value, the research findings will be helpful in promoting effective government policies and corporate designs and in prompting the development of a new public infrastructure that better meets the needs of digitally disadvantaged groups. Moreover, this study will help to direct social and government attention to the problems that exist in the use of new public infrastructures by digitally disadvantaged groups. It will have a significant implication for the future development of smart cities and urban digital inclusiveness in China and worldwide.
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the confidentiality of the respondents’ information but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request for academic purposes only.
Abbad MMM (2021) Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(6):7205–7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
Article Google Scholar
Acharya B, Lee J, Moon H (2022) Preference heterogeneity of local government for implementing ICT infrastructure and services through public-private partnership mechanism. Socio-Economic Plan. Sci. 79(9):101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101103
Ahn MJ, Chen YC (2022) Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: the perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Gov. Inf. Q. 39(2):101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664
Akdim K, Casalo LV, Flavián C (2022) The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 66:102888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102888
Al-Masri AN, Ijeh A, Nasir M (2019) Smart city framework development: challenges and solutions. Smart Technologies and Innovation for a Sustainable Future, Cham
Google Scholar
Alalwan AA, Dwivedi YK, Rana NP (2017) Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: extending UTAUT2 with trust. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37(3):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.002
Ali A, Li C, Hussain A, Bakhtawar (2020) Hedonic shopping motivations and obsessive–compulsive buying on the internet. Glob. Bus. Rev. 25(1):198–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920937535
Ali U, Mehmood A, Majeed MF, Muhammad S, Khan MK, Song HB, Malik KM (2019) Innovative citizen’s services through public cloud in Pakistan: user’s privacy concerns and impacts on adoption. Mob. Netw. Appl. 24(1):47–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1132-x
Almaiah MA, Alamri MM, Al-Rahmi W (2019) Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education. IEEE Access 7:174673–174686. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2957206
Annaswamy TM, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Frieden L (2020) Telemedicine barriers and challenges for persons with disabilities: COVID-19 and beyond. Disabil Health J 13(4):100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100973.3
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aslesen HW, Martin R, Sardo S (2019) The virtual is reality! On physical and virtual space in software firms’ knowledge formation. Entrepreneurship Regional Dev. 31(9-10):669–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1552314
Bagozzi RP, Phillips LW (1982) Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Adm. Sci. Q. 27(3):459–489. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392322
Bai B, Guo ZQ (2022) Understanding users’ continuance usage behavior towards digital health information system driven by the digital revolution under COVID-19 context: an extended UTAUT model. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 15:2831–2842. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.S364275
Bélanger F, Carter L (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 17(2):165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
Blasi S, Ganzaroli A, De Noni I (2022) Smartening sustainable development in cities: strengthening the theoretical linkage between smart cities and SDGs. Sustain. Cities Soc. 80:103793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103793
Botelho FHF (2021) Accessibility to digital technology: virtual barriers, real opportunities. Assistive Technol. 33:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1945705
Brehm, JW (1966). A theory of psychological reactance . Academic Press
Buckingham SA, Walker T, Morrissey K, Smartline Project T (2022) The feasibility and acceptability of digital technology for health and wellbeing in social housing residents in Cornwall: a qualitative scoping study. Digital Health 8:20552076221074124. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221074124
Bygrave W, Minniti M (2000) The social dynamics of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 24(3):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870002400302
Cai Y, Qi W, Yi FM (2023) Smartphone use and willingness to adopt digital pest and disease management: evidence from litchi growers in rural China. Agribusiness 39(1):131–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21766
Carney F, Kandt J (2022) Health, out-of-home activities and digital inclusion in later life: implications for emerging mobility services. Journal of Transport & Health 24:101311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101311
Chao CM (2019) Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: an application and extension of the UTAUT model. Front. Psychol. 10:1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
Chen HY, Chen HY, Zhang W, Yang CD, Cui HX (2021) Research on marketing prediction model based on Markov Prediction. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021(9):4535181. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4535181
Chen J, Cui MY, Levinson D (2024) The cost of working: measuring physical and virtual access to jobs. Int. J. Urban Sci. 28(2):318–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2023.2253208
Chen JX, Wang T, Fang ZY, Wang HT (2023) Research on elderly users’ intentions to accept wearable devices based on the improved UTAUT model. Front. Public Health 10(12):1035398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035398
Chen KF, Guaralda M, Kerr J, Turkay S (2024) Digital intervention in the city: a conceptual framework for digital placemaking. Urban Des. Int. 29(1):26–38. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00203-y
Chen L, Zhang H (2021) Strategic authoritarianism: the political cycles and selectivity of China’s tax-break policy. Am. J. Political Sci. 65(4):845–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12648
Chiu YTH, Hofer KM (2015) Service innovation and usage intention: a cross-market analysis. J. Serv. Manag. 26(3):516–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-10-2014-0274
Chou SW, Min HT, Chang YC, Lin CT (2010) Understanding continuance intention of knowledge creation using extended expectation-confirmation theory: an empirical study of Taiwan and China online communities. Behav. Inf. Technol. 29(6):557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903401986
Cocciolo A (2010) Alleviating physical space constraints using virtual space? A study from an urban academic library. Libr. Hi Tech. 28(4):523–535. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096204
Davidson CA, Willner CJ, van Noordt SJR, Banz BC, Wu J, Kenney JG, Johannesen JK, Crowley MJ (2019) One-month stability of cyberball post-exclusion ostracism distress in Adolescents. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 41(3):400–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09723-4
Dogruel L, Joeckel S, Bowman ND (2015) The use and acceptance of new media entertainment technology by elderly users: development of an expanded technology acceptance model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34(11):1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2015.1077890
Fang ML, Canham SL, Battersby L, Sixsmith J, Wada M, Sixsmith A (2019) Exploring privilege in the digital divide: implications for theory, policy, and practice. Gerontologist 59(1):E1–E15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fergus TA, Valentiner DP, McGrath PB, Gier-Lonsway SL, Kim HS (2012) Short forms of the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale. J. Personal. Assess. 94(3):310–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.660291
Garone A, Pynoo B, Tondeur J, Cocquyt C, Vanslambrouck S, Bruggeman B, Struyven K (2019) Clustering university teaching staff through UTAUT: implications for the acceptance of a new learning management system. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50(5):2466–2483. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12867
Gu QH, Iop (2020) Frame-based conceptual model of smart city’s applications in China. International Conference on Green Development and Environmental Science and Technology (ICGDE), Changsha, CHINA
Book Google Scholar
Guo MJ, Liu YH, Yu HB, Hu BY, Sang ZQ (2016) An overview of smart city in China. China Commun. 13(5):203–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/cc.2016.7489987
Gursoy D, Chi OHX, Lu L, Nunkoo R (2019) Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 49:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
Hair, JF, Hult, GTM, Ringle, CM, & Sarstedt, M (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (Third edition. ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc
Hair Jr JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26(2):106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128
Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1):2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2(4):361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1):115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler, J, Ringle, CM, & Sinkovics, RR (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In RR Sinkovics & PN Ghauri (Eds.), New Challenges to International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979 (2009)0000020014
Hoque R, Sorwar G (2017) Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 101:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002
Hsu CW, Peng CC (2022) What drives older adults’ use of mobile registration apps in Taiwan? An investigation using the extended UTAUT model. Inform. Health Soc. Care 47(3):258–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1990299
Hu J, Zhang H, Irfan M (2023) How does digital infrastructure construction affect low-carbon development? A multidimensional interpretation of evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 396(9):136467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136467
Hu TF, Guo RS, Chen C (2022) Understanding mobile payment adaption with the integrated model of UTAUT and MOA model. 2022 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR, USA
Hutchins N, Allen A, Curran M, Kannis-Dymand L (2021) Social anxiety and online social interaction. Aust. Psychologist 56(2):142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2021.1890977
Iancu I, Iancu B (2020) Designing mobile technology for elderly. A theoretical overview. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 155(9):119977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119977
Jakonen, OI (2024). Smart cities, virtual futures? - Interests of urban actors in mediating digital technology and urban space in Tallinn, Estonia. Urban Studies , 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241245871
Ji TT, Chen JH, Wei HH, Su YC (2021) Towards people-centric smart city development: investigating the citizens’ preferences and perceptions about smart-city services in Taiwan. Sustain. Cities Soc. 67(14):102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102691
Jöreskog KG (1971) Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika 36(4):409–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291366
Joshi Y, Uniyal DP, Sangroya D (2021) Investigating consumers’ green purchase intention: examining the role of economic value, emotional value and perceived marketplace influence. J. Clean. Prod. 328(8):129638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129638
Kadylak T, Cotten SR (2020) United States older adults’ willingness to use emerging technologies. Inf. Commun. Soc. 23(5):736–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1713848
Kaihlanen AM, Virtanen L, Buchert U, Safarov N, Valkonen P, Hietapakka L, Hörhammer I, Kujala S, Kouvonen A, Heponiemi T (2022) Towards digital health equity-a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era. BMC Health Services Research 22(1):188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4
Khan HH, Malik MN, Zafar R, Goni FA, Chofreh AG, Klemes JJ, Alotaibi Y (2020) Challenges for sustainable smart city development: a conceptual framework. Sustain. Dev. 28(5):1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2090
Kim S, Park H (2013) Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(2):318–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006
Leary RB, Vann RJ, Mittelstaedt JD (2019) Perceived marketplace influence and consumer ethical action. J. Consum. Aff. 53(3):1117–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12220
Leary RB, Vann RJ, Mittelstaedt JD, Murphy PE, Sherry JF (2014) Changing the marketplace one behavior at a time: perceived marketplace influence and sustainable consumption. J. Bus. Res. 67(9):1953–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.004
Lee DD, Arya LA, Andy UU, Sammel MD, Harvie HS (2019) Willingness of women with pelvic floor disorders to use mobile technology to communicate with their health care providers. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstructive Surg. 25(2):134–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000668
Lee SW, Sung HJ, Jeon HM (2019) Determinants of continuous intention on food delivery apps: extending UTAUT2 with information quality. Sustainability 11(11):3141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113141 . 15
Li Mo QZ, Bai BY (2023) Height dissatisfaction and loneliness among adolescents: the chain mediating role of social anxiety and social support. Curr. Psychol. 42(31):27296–27304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03855-9
Liébana-Cabanillas F, Japutra A, Molinillo S, Singh N, Sinha N (2020) Assessment of mobile technology use in the emerging market: analyzing intention to use m-payment services in India. Telecommun. Policy 44(9):102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102009 . 17
Liu HD, Zhao HF (2022) Upgrading models, evolutionary mechanisms and vertical cases of service-oriented manufacturing in SVC leading enterprises: product-development and service-innovation for industry 4.0. Humanities Soc. Sci. Commun. 9(1):387. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01409-9 . 24
Liu ZL, Wang Y, Xu Q, Yan T, Iop (2017) Study on smart city construction of Jiujiang based on IOT technology. 3rd International Conference on Advances in Energy, Environment and Chemical Engineering (AEECE), Chengdu, CHINA
Magee WJ, Eaton WW, Wittchen H-U, McGonagle KA, Kessler RC (1996) Agoraphobia, simple phobia, and social phobia in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 53(2):159–168
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martins R, Oliveira T, Thomas M, Tomás S (2019) Firms’ continuance intention on SaaS use - an empirical study. Inf. Technol. People 32(1):189–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2018-0027
Miron AM, Brehm JW (2006) Reactance theory - 40 Years later. Z. Fur Sozialpsychologie 37(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9
Mogaji E, Balakrishnan J, Nwoba AC, Nguyen NP (2021) Emerging-market consumers’ interactions with banking chatbots. Telematics and Informatics 65:101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101711
Mogaji E, Bosah G, Nguyen NP (2023) Transport and mobility decisions of consumers with disabilities. J. Consum. Behav. 22(2):422–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2089
Mogaji E, Nguyen NP (2021) Transportation satisfaction of disabled passengers: evidence from a developing country. Transportation Res. Part D.-Transp. Environ. 98:102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102982
Mora L, Gerli P, Ardito L, Petruzzelli AM (2023) Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda. Technovation 123:102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717
Mulvale G, Moll S, Miatello A, Robert G, Larkin M, Palmer VJ, Powell A, Gable C, Girling M (2019) Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: insights from an international collaboration. Health Expectations 22(3):284–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12864
Narzt W, Mayerhofer S, Weichselbaum O, Pomberger G, Tarkus A, Schumann M (2016) Designing and evaluating barrier-free travel assistance services. 3rd International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations - Information Systems (HCIBGO) Held as Part of 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International), Toronto, CANADA
Nguyen GD, Dao THT (2024) Factors influencing continuance intention to use mobile banking: an extended expectation-confirmation model with moderating role of trust. Humanities Soc. Sci. Commun. 11(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02778-z
Nicolas C, Kim J, Chi S (2020) Quantifying the dynamic effects of smart city development enablers using structural equation modeling. Sustain. Cities Soc. 53:101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101916
Paköz MZ, Sözer C, Dogan A (2022) Changing perceptions and usage of public and pseudo-public spaces in the post-pandemic city: the case of Istanbul. Urban Des. Int. 27(1):64–79. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00147-1
Perez AJ, Siddiqui F, Zeadally S, Lane D (2023) A review of IoT systems to enable independence for the elderly and disabled individuals. Internet Things 21:100653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2022.100653
Purohit S, Arora R, Paul J (2022) The bright side of online consumer behavior: continuance intention for mobile payments. J. Consum. Behav. 21(3):523–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2017
Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW (2012) Editor’s Comments: A Critical Look at the Use of PLS-SEM in “MIS Quarterly”. MIS Q. 36(1):III–XIV
Roubroeks MAJ, Ham JRC, Midden CJH (2010) The dominant robot: threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals. 5th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Copenhagen, DENMARK
Saparudin M, Rahayu A, Hurriyati R, Sultan MA, Ramdan AM, Ieee (2020) Consumers’ continuance intention use of mobile banking in Jakarta: extending UTAUT models with trust. 5th International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), Bandung, Indonesia
Scavarelli A, Arya A, Teather RJ (2021) Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Real. 25(1):257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8
Schneider AB, Leonard B (2022) From anxiety to control: mask-wearing, perceived marketplace influence, and emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Consum. Aff. 56(1):97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12412
Schou J, Pors AS (2019) Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Soc. Policy Adm. 53(3):464–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12470
Schultz LT, Heimberg RG (2008) Attentional focus in social anxiety disorder: potential for interactive processes. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 28(7):1206–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.04.003
Shibusawa H (2000) Cyberspace and physical space in an urban economy. Pap. Regional Sci. 79(3):253–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00013610
Susanto A, Mahadika PR, Subiyakto A, Nuryasin, Ieee (2018) Analysis of electronic ticketing system acceptance using an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Parapat, Indonesia
Susilawati C, Wong J, Chikolwa B (2010) Public participation, values and interests in the procurement of infrastructure projects in Australia: a review and future research direction. 2010 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, Brisbane, Australia
Tam C, Santos D, Oliveira T (2020) Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: extending the expectation confirmation model. Inf. Syst. Front. 22(1):243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9864-5
Teo T, Zhou MM, Fan ACW, Huang F (2019) Factors that influence university students’ intention to use Moodle: a study in Macau. EtrD-Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 67(3):749–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09650-x
Thapa S, Nielsen JB, Aldahmash AM, Qadri FR, Leppin A (2021) Willingness to use digital health tools in patient care among health care professionals and students at a university hospital in Saudi Arabia: quantitative cross-sectional survey. JMIR Med. Educ. 7(1):e18590. https://doi.org/10.2196/18590
Tian X, Solomon DH, Brisini KS (2020) How the comforting process fails: psychological reactance to support messages. J. Commun. 70(1):13–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz040
Troisi O, Fenza G, Grimaldi M, Loia F (2022) Covid-19 sentiments in smart cities: the role of technology anxiety before and during the pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior 126:106986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106986
Venkatesh V, Brown SA (2001) A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Q. 25(1):71–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250959
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3):425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vinnikova A, Lu LD, Wei JC, Fang GB, Yan J (2020) The Use of smartphone fitness applications: the role of self-efficacy and self-regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(20):7639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207639
Wang BA, Zhang R, Wang Y (2021) Mechanism influencing older people’s willingness to use intelligent aged-care products. Healthcare 9(7):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070864
Wang CHJ, Steinfeld E, Maisel JL, Kang B (2021) Is your smart city inclusive? Evaluating proposals from the US department of transportation’s smart city challenge. Sustainable Cities and Society 74:103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103148
Wang XY (2007) Mutually augmented virtual environments for architecural design and collaboration. 12th Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures Conference, Sydney, Australia
Werner P, Karnieli E (2003) A model of the willingness to use telemedicine for routine and specialized care. J. Telemed. Telecare 9(5):264–272. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763303769211274
Yadav J, Saini AK, Yadav AK (2019) Measuring citizens engagement in e-Government projects - Indian perspective. J. Stat. Manag. Syst. 22(2):327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2019.1580908
Yang CC, Liu C, Wang YS (2023) The acceptance and use of smartphones among older adults: differences in UTAUT determinants before and after training. Libr. Hi Tech. 41(5):1357–1375. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-12-2021-0432
Yang K, Forney JC (2013) The moderating role of consumer technology anxiety in mobile shopping adoption: differential effects of facilitating conditions and social influences. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 14(4):334–347
Yeung HL, Hao P (2024) Telecommuting amid Covid-19: the Governmobility of work-from-home employees in Hong Kong. Cities 148:104873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104873
Zander V, Gustafsson C, Stridsberg SL, Borg J (2023) Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. Disabil. Rehabilitation-Assistive Technol. 18(6):913–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1938707
Zeebaree M, Agoyi M, Agel M (2022) Sustainable adoption of e-government from the UTAUT perspective. Sustainability 14(9):5370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095370
Zhang YX, Liu HX, Kang SC, Al-Hussein M (2020) Virtual reality applications for the built environment: Research trends and opportunities. Autom. Constr. 118:103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103311
Zhong YP, Oh S, Moon HC (2021) Service transformation under industry 4.0: investigating acceptance of facial recognition payment through an extended technology acceptance model. Technology in Society 64:101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101515
Zhu DH, Deng ZZ (2021) Effect of social anxiety on the adoption of robotic training partner. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw. 24(5):343–348. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0179
Download references
This research was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China, grant number 22BGJ037; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang, grant number GB202301004; and the Zhejiang Province University Students Science and Technology Innovation Activity Program, grant numbers 2023R403013, 2023R403010 & 2023R403086.
These authors contributed equally: Chengxiang Chu, Zhenyang Shen, Hanyi Xu.
School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
Chengxiang Chu, Zhenyang Shen, Qizhi Wei & Cong Cao
Law School, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Conceptualisation: C.C., CX.C. and ZY.S.; Methodology: CX.C. and HY.X.; Validation: ZY.S. and QZ.W.; Formal analysis: HY.X.; Investigation: CX.C., ZY.S. and HY.X.; Resources: C.C.; Data curation: CX.C. and HY.X.; Writing–original draft preparation: CX.C, ZY.S., HY.X. and QZ.W.; Writing–review & editing: CX.C and C.C.; Visualisation: ZY.S. and HY.X.; Supervision: C.C.; Funding acquisition: C.C., CX.C. and ZY.S.; all authors approved the final manuscript to be submitted.
Correspondence to Cong Cao .
Ethical approval.
Ethical approval for the involvement of human subjects in this study was granted by Institutional Review Board of School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, China, Reference number CC-2023-1-0008-0005-SOM-ZJUT.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Factors | Items | Source |
---|---|---|
Performance Expectancy | 1. Use of ‘accessibility infrastructure’ helps me to handle affairs quickly and efficiently. | Ali et al. ( ) |
2. ‘Accessibility infrastructure’ ensures the accessibility and availability of facilities for handling my affairs. | ||
3. ‘Accessibility infrastructure’ save time in handling my affairs. | ||
4. ‘Accessibility infrastructure’ saves effort in handling my affairs. | ||
Psychological Reactance | 1. The existence or sudden intervention of ‘accessibility infrastructure’ makes me feel angry. | Tian et al. ( ) |
2. The existence or sudden intervention of ‘accessibility infrastructure’ makes me feel irritated. | ||
3. I criticised its existence while using the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | ||
4. When using the ‘accessibility infrastructure’, I preferred the original state. | ||
Perceived Institutional Support | 1. My country helps me use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | Almaiah et al. ( ); Garone et al. ( ) |
2. Public institutions that are important to me think that I should use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | ||
3. I believe that my country supports the use of the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | ||
Perceived Marketplace Influence | 1. I believe that many people in my country use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | Almaiah et al. ( ); Garone et al. ( ) |
2. I believe that many people in my country desire to use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | ||
3. I believe that many people in my country approve of using the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | ||
Effort Expectancy | 1. My interactions with the ‘accessibility infrastructure’ are clear and understandable. | Venkatesh et al. ( ) |
2. It is easy for me to become skilful in using the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | ||
3. Learning to operate the ‘accessibility infrastructure’ is easy for me. | ||
Facilitating Conditions | 1. I have the resources necessary to use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | Venkatesh et al. ( ) |
2. I have the knowledge necessary to use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’. | ||
3. The ‘accessibility infrastructure’ is not compatible with other infrastructure I use. | ||
4. A specific person (or group) is available to assist me with ‘accessibility infrastructure’ difficulties. | ||
Social Interaction Anxiety | 1. I feel tense if talk about myself or my feelings. | Fergus et al. ( ) |
2. I tense up if meet an acquaintance in the street. | ||
3. I feel tense if I am alone with one other person. | ||
4. I feel nervous mixing with people I don’t know well. | ||
5. I worry about being ignored when in a group. | ||
6. I feel tense mixing in a group. | ||
Intention to Use | 1. If I had access to the ‘accessibility infrastructure’, I would intend to use it. | Teo et al. ( ) |
2. If I had access to the ‘accessibility infrastructure’ in the coming months, I believe that I would use it rather than taking other measures. | ||
3. I expect that I will use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’ in my daily life in the future. | ||
4. I plan to use the ‘accessibility infrastructure’ in my daily life in the future. |
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Chu, C., Shen, Z., Xu, H. et al. How to avoid sinking in swamp: exploring the intentions of digitally disadvantaged groups to use a new public infrastructure that combines physical and virtual spaces. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11 , 1135 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03684-0
Download citation
Received : 28 October 2023
Accepted : 29 August 2024
Published : 04 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03684-0
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Effective teacher professional development for school-based mental health promotion: a review of the literature.
1.1. teachers’ role in smhp, 1.2. teacher preparation for smhp, 1.3. capacity building is critical for implementation, 1.4. effective teacher pd for smhp, 1.5. purpose of current review.
3.1. training, 3.1.1. interactive, 3.1.2. staff input, 3.2. technical assistance, 3.2.1. goals, 3.2.2. approach, 3.2.3. activities, 3.3. pd delivery considerations, 3.3.1. online vs. in-person format, 3.3.2. dosage, 3.3.3. expertise of the provider.
Goals | Approach | Activities | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Training | Staff Input | Interactive | Technical Assistance | Develop Skills | Motivation | Generalization/Adaptation | Collaborative | Individualized | Data-driven | Strengths-Based | Modeling | Observation/Feedback | Reflection | Problem Solving |
Becker et al., 2013 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Berkowitz, 2011 [ ] | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
Chafouleas et al., 2016 [ ] | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
Domitrovich et al., 2012 [ ] | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Edgar, 2013 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Elias, 2008 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Eppler-Wolff et al., 2019 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Erchul, 2015 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Flaspohler et al., 2006 [ ] | X | X | |||||||||||||
Gibson et al., 2014 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Hamre et al., 2012 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
Hemmeter et al., 2018 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Lee et al., 2014 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
Owens et al., 2014 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Pas et al., 2015 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Schultz et al., 2015 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Silva & Gimbert, 2001 [ ] | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Swain-Bradway et al., 2015 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Vetter, 2008 [ ] | X | X |
Goals | Approach | Activities | Other Considerations | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Foundational Training | Staff Input | Interactive | Technical Assistance | Develop Skills | Motivation | Generalization/Adaptation | Collaborative | Individualized | Data-driven | Strengths-Based | Modeling | Observation/Feedback | Reflection | Problem Solving | Online | Dosage | Expertise of Provider |
Ashworth et al., 2018 [ ] | Q | Q | Q | Q | Q | Q | Q | X | Q | |||||||||
Becker et al., 2014 [ ] | T | T | X | X | X | X | X | X | T | X | ||||||||
Bradshaw et al., 2012 [ ] | T | T | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Cappella et al., 2011 [ ] | Q | Q | Q | X | Q | X | Q | Q | Q | Q | X | X | ||||||
Cunningham et al., 2013 [ ] | P | P | P | P | P | |||||||||||||
Hamre et al., 2012 [ ] | X | T | X | T | X | X | P | T | ||||||||||
Hough, 2011 [ ] | T | P | X | P | T | P | ||||||||||||
Kutcher et al., 2013 [ ] | T | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Livet et al., 2018 [ ] | X | X | X | X | X | Q | T | |||||||||||
Owens et al., 2017 [ ] | X | P | T | T | X | T | X | X | T | X | T | X | X | |||||
Pas et al., 2015 [ ] | X | T | T | X | X | X | T | |||||||||||
Reinke et al., 2012 [ ] | X | X | X | X | T | T | T | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Steed & Durand, 2013 [ ] | X | X | T | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
Sutherland et al., 2015 [ ] | X | T | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
Wanless et al., 2013 [ ] | X | Q | Q | Q | X | X | Q |
4.1. future directions: research to practice, 4.2. future directions: practice to research, 5. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
Component | Description |
---|---|
Training | Workshop to provide introduction to innovation and build needed knowledge, skills, and motivation |
Staff input | Gather input (e.g., whole staff survey) regarding topics to be covered and alignment of innovation with school mission |
Interactive | Employ active approaches to skill development (e.g., role playing, observation, analysis of models) and include opportunity for discussion and reflection (e.g., connect to current practices) |
Technical Assistance | Ongoing professional development or guidance to improve the implementation of a program or practice, often coaching |
Goals | The overall purpose of TA as part of teacher professional development for SMH is generally to improve implementation |
Developing teacher skills | Enhance and refine skills acquired in training |
Building motivation | Address teacher beliefs and attitudes toward the intervention, self-efficacy, commitment, and resistance to increase likelihood of behavior change |
Assisting with generalization and adaptation | Help teachers adapt innovation to fit local needs and challenges and to integrate with existing curriculum, routines, schedule, and teaching style |
Approach | The TA providers’ approach underlies effective delivery of TA activities |
Collaborative | Work with teachers as partners by building rapport and shared understanding of goals, challenges, and progress |
Individualized | Tailor frequency, intensity, and focus of support to address unique needs and challenges of different teachers |
Data-drive | Use formal and informal data to identify needs, strengths, and values to best prioritize goals and assess implementation quality |
Strengths-based | Acknowledge and celebrate strengths, effort, and success; build on strengths before providing feedback on growth areas |
Activities | The activities of TA, undertaken using the above approaches, help to achieve TA goals |
Modeling | Directly model innovation-specific skills, or provide and analyze video models of these skills |
Observation and performance feedback | Repeatedly observe implementation in person or using video recording and provide detailed, targeted feedback |
Reflection | Incorporate reflection throughout TA, using collaborative reflection to identify areas of focus for coaching and encourage teacher insight into progress and areas for improvement |
Problem solving | Identify and address barriers through a systematic problem-solving process |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Dinnen, H.L.; Litvitskiy, N.S.; Flaspohler, P.D. Effective Teacher Professional Development for School-Based Mental Health Promotion: A Review of the Literature. Behav. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090780
Dinnen HL, Litvitskiy NS, Flaspohler PD. Effective Teacher Professional Development for School-Based Mental Health Promotion: A Review of the Literature. Behavioral Sciences . 2024; 14(9):780. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090780
Dinnen, Hannah L., Nicole S. Litvitskiy, and Paul D. Flaspohler. 2024. "Effective Teacher Professional Development for School-Based Mental Health Promotion: A Review of the Literature" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 9: 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090780
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
This study investigates the relationship between CG attributes and the financial performance of Ethiopian insurance companies. This study used quantitative methodologies and an explanatory research design. The study used a panel data approach with 17 insurance companies, and the timeline for the study was 2015/16–2022/23. The secondary data were obtained from various sources, including yearly reports, the National Bank of Ethiopia, published reports, and pertinent websites. This study employs regression techniques, particularly the fixed effects model and random effects model. This study revealed that board size positively correlates with the financial performance of Ethiopian insurance companies (ROA). This finding shows that a larger board size improves insurance financial performance (ROA) more effectively and efficiently. However, a negative association exists between the size of the board of directors and insurance financial performance (ROE). Nonexecutive board members negatively impact financial performance; this may be due to a lack of industry knowledge and prioritizing interests over shareholders. Audit committees significantly improve financial performance, whereas board meetings and board gender diversity do not significantly impact financial performance. However, CEO dualism has a detrimental effect on the financial performance of insurance companies. The study also revealed no significant association between the financial success of government-owned and privately held insurance companies. This study provides useful insights for academics and policymakers (including the National Bank of Ethiopia, insurance companies, and other corporations).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Data availability.
The study used open-source secondary data from the insurance company, which are available upon request.
Abdullah SN, Aziz A, Azani A (2022) The effect of board independence, gender diversity and board size on firm performance in Malaysia. J Soc Econmics Res 9(4):179–192. https://doi.org/10.18488/35.v9i4.3226
Article Google Scholar
Ajao MG, Ogieriakhi E (2018) Firm specific factors and performance of insurance firms in Nigeria. Amity J Finance 3(1):14–28
Google Scholar
Alam A, Ali Shah SZ (2013) Corporate governance and its impact on firm risk. Int J Manag, Econ Soc Sci 2(2):76–98. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2280479
Al-Daoud KI, Saidin SZ, Abidin S (2016) Board meeting and firm performance: evidence from the amman stock exchange. Corp Board: Role, Duties Compos 12(2):6–11. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv12i2art1
Aljughaiman AA (2019) Effects of corporate governance mechanisms on financial flexibility, risk-taking behaviour and risk management effectiveness: a comparison study between conventional and Islamic banking systems (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University). http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/4660 . Accessed 20 Dec 2023
Almajali AY, Alamro SA, Al-Soub YZ (2012) Factors affecting the financial performance of Jordanian insurance companies listed at amman stock exchange. J Manag Res 4(2):266
Al-Matari EM, Al-Arussi AS (2016) The effect of the ownership structure characteristics on firm performance in oman: empirical study. Corp Ownersh Control 13(2):93–100. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i2p10
Azegele M, Okeyo W, Nyambegera S (2021) The relationship between corporate governance and organizational performance of insurance companies in Kenya. J Public Policy Gov 5(3):21–36. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2009
Azutoru IHC, Obinne UG, Chinelo OO (2017) Effect of corporate governance mechanisms on financial performance of insurance companies in Nigeria. J Finance Account 5(3):93–103. https://doi.org/10.12691/jfa-5-3-4
Badu LA, Appiah KO (2017) The impact of corporate board size on firm performance: evidence from Ghana and Nigeria. Res Business Manag 4(2):1. https://doi.org/10.5296/rbm.v4i2.11721
Banda M (2023) Corporate governance: a theoretical review. Euro J Business Manag 15(16):60–70. https://doi.org/10.7176/EJBM/15-16-08
Bazhair AH (2021) Corporate governance mechanism and firm performance in Saudi Arabia. Estudios de Economia Aplicada. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.4317
Borlea SN, Achim MV (2013) Theories of corporate governance. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş” Arad Economics Series, 23 (1), 117–128
Buchdadi AD, Gulupui IGKA, Dalimunthe S, Pamungkas BG, Fauziyyah Y (2019) Board of director meeting and firm performance. Acad Account Financial Stud J 23(2):1–7
Bunea M, Dobre F, Popa AF, Sahlian DN (2018) Risk management, corporate governance and financial performance of the banking system in Romania. Proceedings of the international conference on business excellence, 12(1), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0018
Chijoke-Mgbame AM, Boateng A, Mgbame CO (2020) Board gender diversity, audit committee and financial performance: evidence from Nigeria. Accounting Forum 44(3):262–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2020.1766280
Dandago KI, Gugong BK (2016) Impact of corporate governance mechanisms on the financial performance of listed insurance firms in Nigeria. Account Financial History Res J 10:245–264
Dankwano RN, Hassan Z (2018) Impact of gender diversity on indian firm’s financial performance. Int J Manag, Account Econ 5(5):319–341
Dao B, Pham H (2015) Corporate governance and bank credit risk: default probability, distance to default. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2708994
Datta N (2018) Impact of corporate governance on financial performance: a study on dse listed insurance companies in Bangladesh. Global J Manag Business Res 18(2):32–39
Debnath P, Das P, Laskar N, Khan SB, Dhand S, Kaushal K (2021) CEO duality and firm performance: an empirical study on listed companies from an emerging market. Corp Gov Organ Behav Rev 5(2):194–202. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv5i2sip7
Demeke AT (2016) Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: the case of ethiopian insurance industry. J Invest Manag 5(2):6. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20160502.11
Dogan M, Elitas BL, Agca V, Ögel S (2013) The impact of CEO duality on firm performance: evidence from Turkey. Int J Bus Soc Sci 4(2):149–155
Duru A, Iyengar RJ, Zampelli EM (2016) The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: the moderating role of board independence. J Bus Res 69(10):4269–4277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.001
Ebere CC, EAL, I., & Ogbonna, G. (2016) Corporate governance system and financial performance of quoted insurance companies in Nigeria. Int J Business Law Res 4(4):34–41
Eling M, Marek SD (2014) Corporate governance and risk taking: evidence from the UK and German insurance markets. J Risk Insur 81(3):653–682
Emile R, Ragab A, Kyaw S (2014) The effect of corporate governance on firm performance, evidence from Egypt. Asian Econ Financial Rev 4(12):1865–1877
Fekadu GW (2015) Corporate governance on financial performance of insurance industRY. Corp Ownersh Control 13(1):1201–1209. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c10p7
Foyeke OI, Oluku MD, Titilayo AD, Folashade O (2016) Corporate governance mechanisms and the financial performance of companies in Nigeria. J South Afr Business Res 2016:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5171/2016.985669
Franke GR (2010) Multicollinearity. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, pp 197–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02066
Book Google Scholar
Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press
Garba T, Abubakar BA (2014) Corporate board diversity and financial performance of insurance companies in nigeria: an application of panel data approach. Asian Econ Financial Rev 4(2):257–277
Gugong BK, Arugu LO, Dandago KI (2014) The impact of ownership structure on the financial performance of listed insurance firms in Nigeria. Int J Acad Res Account, Finance Manag Sci 4(1):409–416
Gujarati DN, Porter DC (2009) Basic econometrics, 5th edn. McGraw-hill
Guluma TF (2021) The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfidence. Future Business J 7(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00093-6
Hassan MK, Houston R, Karim MS, Sabit A (2023) CEO duality and firm performance during the 2020 coronavirus outbreak. J Econ Asymmetries 27:e00278
Himaj S (2014) Corporate governance in banks and its impact on risk and performance: review of literature on the selected governance mechanisms. J Central Banking Theor Pract 3(3):53–85
Ibrahim HB, Ouma C, Koshal JO (2019) Effect of audit committee independence on the financial performance of insurance firms in Kenya. Int J Res Business Soc Sci 8(6):15–24. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v8i6.501
Islam MN, Akter A, Sheikh MI (2018) Does board diversity matter for insurance company’s profitability? J Jessore Univ Sci Technol 03(02):65–71
Jaishi B, Poudel RL (2021) Impact of firm specific factors on financial performance: a comparative study of life and non-life insurance companies in Nepal. Prithvi Acad J 4:39–55. https://doi.org/10.3126/paj.v4i0.37014
Jarque CM, Bera AK (1987) A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals. Int Stat Rev/Revue Int De Statistique 55(2):163. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403192
Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023
Johnson Jr BL (1995) Resource Dependence theory: A Political Economy Model of Organizations. Working Paper of the Department of Educational Administration. University of Utah
Junaid M, Xue Y, Wasim Syed M, Ziaullah M, Riffat N (2020) Corporate governance mechanism and performance of insurers in Pakistan. Green Finance 2(3):243–262. https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2020014
Kafidipe A, Uwalomwa U, Dahunsi O, Okeme FO (2021) Corporate governance, risk management and financial performance of listed deposit money bank in Nigeria. Cogent Business Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1888679
Kamau AM, Olweny T, Muturi WM (2021) Effect of firm characteristics on financial performance of insurance firms in Kenya. Int J Business Manag 9(6):292–300. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijbm/2021/v9/i6/bm2105-061
Kaushal S, Ghosh A (2016) Financial institutions and economic growth: an empirical analysis of Indian economy in the post liberalized era. Int J Econ Financial Issue 6(3):1003–1013
Kiptoo IK, Kariuki SN, Ocharo KN (2021) Risk management and financial performance of insurance firms in Kenya. Cogent Business Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1997246
Koji K, Adhikary BK, Tram L (2020) Corporate governance and firm performance: a comparative analysis between listed family and non-family firms in Japan. J Risk Financial Manag 13(9):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090215
Kufo A, Shtembari E (2023) How board size and board independence affect insurance companies’ performance. Euro J Interdiscip Stud 15(1):68–80. https://doi.org/10.24818/ejis.2023.05
Kyei SM, Polovina N, Kumah SP (2022) The dynamic relationship between bank risk and corporate governance in Africa. Cogent Business Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2124597
Laporšek S, Dolenc P, Grum A, Stubelj I (2021) Ownership structure and firm performance–the case of Slovenia. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 34(1):2975–2996. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1865827
Lawala OD, Agbib ES, Mustapha LO (2018) Effect of ownership structure on financial performance of listed insurance firms in Nigeria. J Account, Finance Audit Stud 4(3):123–148
Lipton M, Lorsch JW (1992) A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48(1):59–77
Maharjan R (2019) Corporate governance and financial performance of insurance companies in Nepal. Int Res J Manag Sci 4(1):99–117. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjms.v4i0.27888
Mallinguh E, Wasike C, Zoltan Z (2020) The business sector, firm age, and performance: the mediating role of foreign ownership and financial leverage. Int J Financial Stud 8(4):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8040079
Marinova J, Plantenga J, Remery C (2016) Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27(15):1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229
Martínez MDCV, Rambaud SC (2019) Women on corporate boards and firm’s financial performance. Women’s Stud Int Forum 76:102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102251
Mbah AK, Paothong A (2015) Shapiro-Francia test compared to other normality test using expected p-value. J Stat Comput Simul 85(15):3002–3016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2014.947986
McNulty, T., Florackis, C., & Ormrod, P. (2012). Corporate governance and risk: a study of board structure and process. In ACCA Research Report (Vol. 129)
Mohammad SJ, Abdullatif M, Zakzouk F (2018) The effect of gender diversity on the financial performance of Jordanian banks. Acad Account Financial Stud J 22(2):1–11
Moses GL (2020) Corporate board diversity and financial performance: the nigerian insurance sector’s perspective. Growth 7(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.511.2020.71.20.25
Mubeen R, Han D, Abbas J, Álvarez-Otero S, Sial MS (2021) The relationship between CEO duality and business firms’ performance: the moderating role of firm size and corporate social responsibility. Front Psychol 12:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669715
Nandi S, Ghosh S (2013) Corporate governance attributes, firm characteristics and the level of corporate disclosure: evidence from the Indian listed firms. Decision Sci Lett 2(1):45–58
Nduati Kariuki S (2023) Corporate governance mechanisms and efficiency of insurance firms: evidence from an emerging market. Cogent Econ Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2207265
Onofrei M, Firtescu BN, Terinte PA (2019) CEO duality and firm profitability. Evidence from emerging Europe. Romanian Stat Rev 2(2):85–102
Opeyemi A (2019) The impact of firm size on firms performance in nigeria: a comparative study of selected firms in the building industry in Nigeria. Asian Develop Policy Rev 7(1):1–11
Osborne JW, Waters E (2002) Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Pract Assess, Res Eval. https://doi.org/10.7275/r222-hv23
Osman MAM, Samontaray DP (2022) Corporate Governance and Performance of Insurance Companies in the Saudi Market. J Asian Finance, Econ Business 9(4):213–0228. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no4.0213
Postnova A (2012) Does good corporate governance reduce credit risk? Master Thesis, Hanken School of Economics. https://helda.helsinki.fi/items/8491bf05-9b07-4af7-ba6c-7e3b5b66fb80
Qadorah AAM, Fadzil FHB (2018) The relationship between board size and CEO duality and firm performance: evidence from Jordan. Int J Account, Finance Risk Manag 3(3):16–20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20180303.11
Rachdi H, Trabelsi MA, Trad N (2013) Banking governance and risk: The case of tunisian conventional banks. Rev Econ Perspect 13(4):195–206. https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2013-0009
Shrivastav SM, Kalsie A (2016) The relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: an analysis using panel data approach. IUP J Corp Gov 15(2):37–38
Subedi SD (2018) Role of corporate governance on the performance of insurance companies of Nepal. J Business Soc Sci Res 3(2):151–164. https://doi.org/10.3126/jbssr.v3i2.28131
Sulimany HG, Ramakrishnan S, Chaudhry A, Bazhair AH (2021) Impact of corporate governance and financial sustainability on shareholder value. Stud Appl Econ 39(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.431
Tornyeva K, Wereko T (2012) Corporate governance and firm performance : evidence from the insurance sector of Ghana. Euro J Business Manag 4(13):95–113
Trinh TH, Duyen TTT, Thao NT (2015) The impact of corporate governance on financial risk in Vietnamese commercial banks. Int J Econ Financ 7(7):123–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n7p123
Vincent, K., Modjo, M. I., & Limijaya, A. (2023). The Effect of Corporate Governance Regulation on the Profitability of Insurance Companies in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 426, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602095
Wiedmaier-Pfister, M., Gesesse, D., Amha, W., Mommartz, R., Dufllos, E., & Steel, W. (2008). Access to finance in Ethiopia. Sector Assessment Study, 2
Wondem BA, Singh Batra G (2019) The impact of corporate governance practices on corporate financial performance in Ethiopia. Int J Account Res 07(01):1–10. https://doi.org/10.35248/2472-114x.19.7.196
Yemane AA, Raju ML (2015) The impact of corporate governance on firm’s performance: evidence from ethiopian insurance companies. Res J Finance Account 6(15):20–28
Yihun WA, Kolech AG, Tole MG (2019) The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of commercial banks: the case of private banks in Ethiopia. Financial Stud 23(1(83)):6–24. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n15p93
Young J (2010) Corporate governance and risk management: a South African perspective. Corp Ownersh Control 7(3):138–148. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i3p10
Zelalem BA, Abebe AA, Bezabih SW (2022) Corporate governance and financial performance in the emerging economy: the case of Ethiopian insurance companies. Cogent Econ Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2117117
Download references
Not funded.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Commerce, Punjabi University, Patiala, India
Nebyu Adamu Abebe & Navkiranjit Kaur Dhaliwal
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
All the authors collaborated to design and conceptualize the study.
Correspondence to Nebyu Adamu Abebe .
Conflict of interest.
There are no financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.
Not applicable.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Abebe, N.A., Dhaliwal, N.K. An empirical investigation of corporate governance attributes and firm performance: evidence from the ethiopian insurance industry. SN Bus Econ 4 , 108 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00707-5
Download citation
Received : 14 February 2024
Accepted : 14 August 2024
Published : 03 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00707-5
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Enterprise performance is the input -output situation of a company during a. certain period of operation. The enterpris e must hope to obtain the maximum. output with the minimum input, and thus ...
This literature review synthesized the relevant literature pertaining to the role of organizational culture on business performance in a perspective of the corporate group. The literature review ...
This review aims to present a systematic review of empirical research on leadership and firm performance (FP) in order to synthesize the fragmented knowledge and propose a unifying framework for future research. To achieve this purpose, this research adopts systematic literature review methodology.
This literature review synthesized the relevant literature pertaining to the role of organizational culture on business performance in a perspective of the corporate group. The literature review comprised various published sources on the role of organizational culture, such as journals, periodicals, seminal books, and other published materials.
After analyzing 38 articles for this review, we found a common trend of having a positive impact of corporate sustainability on financial performance. Our literature review suggests that corporate sustainability is shaped and governed by institutional qualities and legitimacy requirements.
Finally, the results have shown that Leverage, R&D, and Size have decent impacts on corporate returns, both Accounting performance and Market performance. Despite having some limitations, the study has provided critical insights into the literature review and established a big picture of the relationship between risk-taking and corporate return.
Performance Management - Sage Journals
To shed new light on this issue, we mapped this topic via a systematic review and content analysis of 53 articles identified in the confluence between CSR and financial performance from 1984 to 2021. Our study suggests that CSR directly impacts a company's financial performance, and this impact becomes more significant as the company's ...
C. Y. Ouyang DOI: 10.4236/jss.2020.84044 617 Open Journal of Social Sciences minished, and how to improve corporate performance is still one of the prob-
The first review by Huang ( 2021) explained why companies under-take ESG activities. According to this author, despite the substantial and growing body of literature, it remains underdeveloped, and there are sig-nificant theoretical gaps related to attempts to build an explanatory the-ory on ESG metrics and financial performance based on Friedman's
Institutional ownership, corporate social responsibility and firms performance. The review of the literature suggests that other than cultural, social, legal and financial factors the ownership structure and the internal corporate governance mechanism play a pivotal role in determining the allocation of resources for CSR activities in the firms ...
This paper fulfils the need of a comprehensive review of corporate sustainability performance assessment literature. It provides a literature review and bibliography for the period between January 1992 and March 2011 for the use of both academicians and practitioners.
It is one of the serious matters related to the capability of directors of their effects on corporate performance (Song et al., Citation 2020 ... T. H. H., Ntim, C. G., & Malagila, J. K. (2020). Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. ...
From 1980s, there are more and more studies about organization culture. And in Chinese studies and practices, we pay much attention to the culture due to the direct relationship between the organization culture and corporate performance, which we can be convinced by some academic papers. But there are some limitations in the study. This paper would like to give a literature review about ...
a systematic literature review and future research agenda
2. Organization Culture and Corporate Performance 2.1 Corporate Performance The unique question about the corporate performance is the problem of variable selection, that is, which variable could measure the true corporate performance or value well. Still, the literature is even more ambiguous about the measurement of corporate performance.
The main objective of the paper is to assess the relationship between firms' financial resilience and firms' strategic sustainable development vulnerabilities, in the context of implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms' business environment. Background: The last decade has emphasized an increase in business models' uncertainty and risk exposure. The COVID-19 pandemic has ...
Abstract. The underlining presuppo sition and the supposition of performance management as a st udy field have been controversial. or have a non -defined concept ever s ince the field was introd ...
This study is a literature review on corporate governance. Its objective is to consolidate our knowledge in this field, examine its evolution, and propose avenues for future research. In our review of the past and present literature on various governance measures and their effect on firm performance, we find that the empirical results are mixed ...
Corporate Ownership & Control / Volume 14, Issue 4, Summer 2017 15 THE LINK BETWEEN AUDIT COMMITTEES, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE QUALITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A LITERATURE REVIEW Patrick Velte* *Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany 1. INTRODUCTION Empirical research on the impact of audit committees (AC) on corporate governance quality is
Performance measurement (PM) is essential for assessing organizational efficacy, employing various methodologies and frameworks. In the literature, performance measurement is handled from two perspectives in the first group, effects of performance and factors affecting the organizational performance is analyzed.
The literature takes into account the effects of strategic lag, collects long-term time data, and studies the continuity of performance response based on this, expanding the research on competitive strategy and corporate performance. The vertical integration strategy is one of the developmental strategies.
2. Corporate social responsibility. CSR has been studied for some time now, but a consensus is still missing concerning its definition and its constituent dimensions, constructs and principles (Crane et al., Citation 2008). In a comprehensive literature review, Dahlsrud (Citation 2008) identified 37 different definitions of CSR.There is great variation in these CSR perceptions and definitions.
We review the literature and state the hypotheses in Section ... Corporate governance, board gender diversity and corporate performance: a critical review of literature. Eur Sci J 12:221-233. Google Scholar Zagorchev A (2024) Board gender diversity, governance, and firm value: an international evidence. Review of Pacific Basin Financial ...
A Review of Corporate Financial Performance Literature: A Mini-Review Approach Keywords. July 2021. July 2021. DOI: 10.46254/AN11.20210713. Conference: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ...
Performance expectancy is defined as the degree to which an individual believes that using a system will help him or her achieve gains in job performance (Chao, 2019; Venkatesh et al. 2003). In ...
Teachers are critically involved in the delivery of school-based mental health promotion (SMHP) interventions in school, though pre-service teacher education often leaves teachers feeling underprepared in this area. Thus, understanding how best to build teachers' capacity for delivery through effective professional development (PD) is essential for teachers to fulfill their role as delivery ...
According to the literature, a corporate governance structure can increase a corporation's financial strength and performance, enhancing its overall value. ... Himaj S (2014) Corporate governance in banks and its impact on risk and performance: review of literature on the selected governance mechanisms. J Central Banking Theor Pract 3(3):53-85.
To address this void in literature, this study has reviewed 78 papers following a systematic approach focused on the linkage of GHRM with multiple dimensions of individual performance. This review ...
1 INTRODUCTION. Since Bowen's first work, the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance in the business context has become a topic of significant relevance.The idea and perception of CSR change from company to company, between managers, and in different societies (Lau, Hulpke, To and Kelly, 2007).However, a common aspect exists: instead of companies ...