• Corpus ID: 141453887

Student Perspectives on Homework.

  • Jan Wilson , J. F. Rhodes
  • Published 22 December 2010
  • Education 3-13

16 Citations

The effectiveness of flipping classroom instruction with homework assignments so as to increase student understanding in algebra, homework – is there a connection with classroom assessment a review from sweden, the impact of social network on high school students’ physics homework: an experimental study, worst day to assign homework: a study of missing assignments and due dates in one rural missouri high school, understanding student variances in learning outcomes and task interpretations from multimedia presentations, the effect of mandatory assignments on students learning outcome and performance in introductory programming courses, regulation of motivation: predicting students’ homework motivation management at the secondary school level, the impact of the continuum of an education programme on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about english language education, factors affecting homework completion among students.

  • Highly Influenced

Vliv procvičování na Khan Academy na znalosti a dovednosti žáků v matematice

7 references, does homework matter an investigation of teacher perceptions about homework practices for children from nondominant backgrounds, putting an end to the battle over homework., if they'd only do their work., homework that helps., homework for all--in moderation., related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Stanford University

Along with Stanford news and stories, show me:

  • Student information
  • Faculty/Staff information

We want to provide announcements, events, leadership messages and resources that are relevant to you. Your selection is stored in a browser cookie which you can remove at any time using “Clear all personalization” below.

Denise Pope

Education scholar Denise Pope has found that too much homework has negative effects on student well-being and behavioral engagement. (Image credit: L.A. Cicero)

A Stanford researcher found that too much homework can negatively affect kids, especially their lives away from school, where family, friends and activities matter.

“Our findings on the effects of homework challenge the traditional assumption that homework is inherently good,” wrote Denise Pope , a senior lecturer at the Stanford Graduate School of Education and a co-author of a study published in the Journal of Experimental Education .

The researchers used survey data to examine perceptions about homework, student well-being and behavioral engagement in a sample of 4,317 students from 10 high-performing high schools in upper-middle-class California communities. Along with the survey data, Pope and her colleagues used open-ended answers to explore the students’ views on homework.

Median household income exceeded $90,000 in these communities, and 93 percent of the students went on to college, either two-year or four-year.

Students in these schools average about 3.1 hours of homework each night.

“The findings address how current homework practices in privileged, high-performing schools sustain students’ advantage in competitive climates yet hinder learning, full engagement and well-being,” Pope wrote.

Pope and her colleagues found that too much homework can diminish its effectiveness and even be counterproductive. They cite prior research indicating that homework benefits plateau at about two hours per night, and that 90 minutes to two and a half hours is optimal for high school.

Their study found that too much homework is associated with:

* Greater stress: 56 percent of the students considered homework a primary source of stress, according to the survey data. Forty-three percent viewed tests as a primary stressor, while 33 percent put the pressure to get good grades in that category. Less than 1 percent of the students said homework was not a stressor.

* Reductions in health: In their open-ended answers, many students said their homework load led to sleep deprivation and other health problems. The researchers asked students whether they experienced health issues such as headaches, exhaustion, sleep deprivation, weight loss and stomach problems.

* Less time for friends, family and extracurricular pursuits: Both the survey data and student responses indicate that spending too much time on homework meant that students were “not meeting their developmental needs or cultivating other critical life skills,” according to the researchers. Students were more likely to drop activities, not see friends or family, and not pursue hobbies they enjoy.

A balancing act

The results offer empirical evidence that many students struggle to find balance between homework, extracurricular activities and social time, the researchers said. Many students felt forced or obligated to choose homework over developing other talents or skills.

Also, there was no relationship between the time spent on homework and how much the student enjoyed it. The research quoted students as saying they often do homework they see as “pointless” or “mindless” in order to keep their grades up.

“This kind of busy work, by its very nature, discourages learning and instead promotes doing homework simply to get points,” Pope said.

She said the research calls into question the value of assigning large amounts of homework in high-performing schools. Homework should not be simply assigned as a routine practice, she said.

“Rather, any homework assigned should have a purpose and benefit, and it should be designed to cultivate learning and development,” wrote Pope.

High-performing paradox

In places where students attend high-performing schools, too much homework can reduce their time to foster skills in the area of personal responsibility, the researchers concluded. “Young people are spending more time alone,” they wrote, “which means less time for family and fewer opportunities to engage in their communities.”

Student perspectives

The researchers say that while their open-ended or “self-reporting” methodology to gauge student concerns about homework may have limitations – some might regard it as an opportunity for “typical adolescent complaining” – it was important to learn firsthand what the students believe.

The paper was co-authored by Mollie Galloway from Lewis and Clark College and Jerusha Conner from Villanova University.

Media Contacts

Denise Pope, Stanford Graduate School of Education: (650) 725-7412, [email protected] Clifton B. Parker, Stanford News Service: (650) 725-0224, [email protected]

Is Homework Good for Kids? Here’s What the Research Says

A s kids return to school, debate is heating up once again over how they should spend their time after they leave the classroom for the day.

The no-homework policy of a second-grade teacher in Texas went viral last week , earning praise from parents across the country who lament the heavy workload often assigned to young students. Brandy Young told parents she would not formally assign any homework this year, asking students instead to eat dinner with their families, play outside and go to bed early.

But the question of how much work children should be doing outside of school remains controversial, and plenty of parents take issue with no-homework policies, worried their kids are losing a potential academic advantage. Here’s what you need to know:

For decades, the homework standard has been a “10-minute rule,” which recommends a daily maximum of 10 minutes of homework per grade level. Second graders, for example, should do about 20 minutes of homework each night. High school seniors should complete about two hours of homework each night. The National PTA and the National Education Association both support that guideline.

But some schools have begun to give their youngest students a break. A Massachusetts elementary school has announced a no-homework pilot program for the coming school year, lengthening the school day by two hours to provide more in-class instruction. “We really want kids to go home at 4 o’clock, tired. We want their brain to be tired,” Kelly Elementary School Principal Jackie Glasheen said in an interview with a local TV station . “We want them to enjoy their families. We want them to go to soccer practice or football practice, and we want them to go to bed. And that’s it.”

A New York City public elementary school implemented a similar policy last year, eliminating traditional homework assignments in favor of family time. The change was quickly met with outrage from some parents, though it earned support from other education leaders.

New solutions and approaches to homework differ by community, and these local debates are complicated by the fact that even education experts disagree about what’s best for kids.

The research

The most comprehensive research on homework to date comes from a 2006 meta-analysis by Duke University psychology professor Harris Cooper, who found evidence of a positive correlation between homework and student achievement, meaning students who did homework performed better in school. The correlation was stronger for older students—in seventh through 12th grade—than for those in younger grades, for whom there was a weak relationship between homework and performance.

Cooper’s analysis focused on how homework impacts academic achievement—test scores, for example. His report noted that homework is also thought to improve study habits, attitudes toward school, self-discipline, inquisitiveness and independent problem solving skills. On the other hand, some studies he examined showed that homework can cause physical and emotional fatigue, fuel negative attitudes about learning and limit leisure time for children. At the end of his analysis, Cooper recommended further study of such potential effects of homework.

Despite the weak correlation between homework and performance for young children, Cooper argues that a small amount of homework is useful for all students. Second-graders should not be doing two hours of homework each night, he said, but they also shouldn’t be doing no homework.

Not all education experts agree entirely with Cooper’s assessment.

Cathy Vatterott, an education professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, supports the “10-minute rule” as a maximum, but she thinks there is not sufficient proof that homework is helpful for students in elementary school.

“Correlation is not causation,” she said. “Does homework cause achievement, or do high achievers do more homework?”

Vatterott, the author of Rethinking Homework: Best Practices That Support Diverse Needs , thinks there should be more emphasis on improving the quality of homework tasks, and she supports efforts to eliminate homework for younger kids.

“I have no concerns about students not starting homework until fourth grade or fifth grade,” she said, noting that while the debate over homework will undoubtedly continue, she has noticed a trend toward limiting, if not eliminating, homework in elementary school.

The issue has been debated for decades. A TIME cover in 1999 read: “Too much homework! How it’s hurting our kids, and what parents should do about it.” The accompanying story noted that the launch of Sputnik in 1957 led to a push for better math and science education in the U.S. The ensuing pressure to be competitive on a global scale, plus the increasingly demanding college admissions process, fueled the practice of assigning homework.

“The complaints are cyclical, and we’re in the part of the cycle now where the concern is for too much,” Cooper said. “You can go back to the 1970s, when you’ll find there were concerns that there was too little, when we were concerned about our global competitiveness.”

Cooper acknowledged that some students really are bringing home too much homework, and their parents are right to be concerned.

“A good way to think about homework is the way you think about medications or dietary supplements,” he said. “If you take too little, they’ll have no effect. If you take too much, they can kill you. If you take the right amount, you’ll get better.”

More Must-Reads from TIME

  • Breaking Down the 2024 Election Calendar
  • Heman Bekele Is TIME’s 2024 Kid of the Year
  • The Reintroduction of Kamala Harris
  • A Battle Over Fertility Law in China
  • For the Love of Savoring Sandwiches : Column
  • The 1 Heart-Health Habit You Should Start When You’re Young
  • Cuddling Might Help You Get Better Sleep
  • The 50 Best Romance Novels to Read Right Now

Write to Katie Reilly at [email protected]

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

education-logo

Article Menu

students perspective on homework

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Homework’s implications for the well-being of primary school pupils—perceptions of children, parents, and teachers.

students perspective on homework

1. Introduction

1.1. homework—perspectives of students, teachers, and parents, 1.2. homework practices in primary education in romania, 1.3. present study, 2. methodology, 2.1. design, data collection methods, and procedures, 2.2. participants, 2.3. data analysis, 3. research findings, 3.1. homework not liked by students.

Learning CycleStudentsParentsTeachers
Classes
I–II
- homework in the subject in which they are not doing well (61.5%);
- for which they put a lot of effort (23.1%);
- considered difficult (15.4%).
- that put them in difficulty (30%);
- difficult, above their level of knowledge (30%);
- in a discipline they do not prefer (20%);
- for which they put a lot of effort (20%).
- repetitive (35.7%);
- long and tiring (28.6%);
- for which a lot of effort is put in (14.3%);
- considered difficult (14.3%);
- considered uninteresting (7.1%).
Classes
III–IV
- for which they put a lot of effort (38.5%);
- long and tiring (30.8%);
- difficult (15.4%);
- repetitive (7.7%);
- with imposed limits (7.7%).
- for which they put a lot of effort (42.9%);
- make students feel insecure about their strengths (14.3%);
- with imposed limits (14.3%);
- that are not appreciated (14.3%);
- in a particular discipline they do not prefer (14.3%).
- for which they put effort (30.8%);
- long and tiring (23.1%);
- that put them in difficulty (23.1%);
- repetitive (15.4%);
- with imposed limits (e.g., compositions with given homework or a limited number of lines) (7.7%).

3.2. Students’ Negative Reactions When Doing Homework

Learning CycleStudentsParentsTeachers
Classes
I–II
- feel bad and blame themselves for forgetting (50.0%);
- are disappointed (37.5%);
- get upset that they can’t go to play because they can’t finish promptly (12.5%).
- after calm discussions, they resume work even though they are disappointed (33.3%);
- students cry when forced to do homework (16.7%);
- students are disappointed (8.3%);
- take a break and restart after (8.3%);
- are stressed (8.3%);
- lose patience (8.3%);
- demotivate very quickly (8.3%);
- categorically refuse to do them (8.3%).
- categorically refuse to do them (25.0%);
- students cry when forced to do their homework (16.7%);
- they intentionally forget their notebook at home (16.7%);
- demotivate very quickly (8.3%);
- get discouraged and ask their parents to help them (8.3%);
- admit they don’t know, but try (8.3%);
- get angry (8.3%);
- take an interest in solving them (8.3%).
Classes
III–IV
- feel bad and blame themselves for forgetting (36.4%);
- gather frustrations (27.3%);
- take a break and resume after (9.1%);
- get discouraged and ask their parents to help them (9.1%);
- take an interest in solving (9.1%);
- lose confidence in their strength (9.1%).
- they gather frustration and close themselves off (50.0%);
- I take a break and restart after (20.0%);
- after calm discussions resume their work (10.0%);
- get discouraged and ask their parents to help them (10.0%);
- lose confidence in their strength (10.0%).
- honestly say they don’t know (16.7%);
- refuse to solve their homework (16.7%);
- are disappointed (16.7%);
- get discouraged and ask their parents to help them (16.7%);
- take a break and resume after (8.3%);
- cry when forced to do their homework (8.3%);
- they intentionally forget their notebook at home (8.3%);
- students ask for help (8.3%).

3.3. Homework That Makes Children Feel Good

Learning CycleStudentsParentsTeachers
Classes
I–II
- contain creative elements (visual arts or text composition) (50.0%);
- who value them and feel appreciated (16.7%);
- reading (8.3%);
- by choice (8.3%).
- those preparing for competitions (71.4%);
- those in preparation for classroom assessments (28.6%).
- involve the use of imagination (22.2%);
- homework that makes students feel valued (22.2%);
- appeal to real life (11.1%);
- are related to practical things (11.1%);
- homework to be checked with the teacher (11.1%);
- negotiated with the teacher (11.1%);
- in which a funny story is found (11.1%).
Classes
III–IV
- involve the use of imagination (30.8%);
- value them and feel appreciated (23.1%);
- creative (23.1%);
- increasing their self-confidence (15.4%);
- appeal to real life (7.7%).
- make them feel appreciated (62.5%);
- involves the use of imagination (12.5%);
- are related to practical things (12.5%);
- carried out as a team (12.5%).
- value them and feel appreciated (21.1%);
- the projects they present to the class (15.8%);
- for which they are rewarded (10.5%);
- involve the use of imagination (5.3%);
- homework that appeals to real life (5.3%);
- changing the word “homework” to something else (5.3%);
- in teams (5.3%);
- investigation on a specific topic (5.3%);
- creative (5.3%);
- easy, which is effortless (5.3%);
- in the form of debates (5.3%);
- differentiated (5.3%);
- increasing their self-confidence (5.3%).

3.4. Homework Students Like

Learning CycleStudentsParentsTeachers
Classes
I–II
- in the form of reading or writing (35.7%);
- contain creative elements (28.6%);
- make them feel appreciated (14.3%);
- preparation for evaluation (14.3%).
- Maths exercises (62.5%);
- reading (25.0%);
- projects (12.5%).
- practice (15.8%);
- that they carry out on their own (15.8%);
- are resolved in a relatively short time (15.8%);
- attractive (10.5%);
- contain creative elements (10.5%);
- Maths exercises (10.5%);
- in the form of gambling (10.5%);
- reading or writing (5.3%);
- arouse curiosity (5.3%).
Classes
III–IV
- contain creative elements (35.3%);
- reading (35.3%);
- Maths exercises (11.8%);
- attractive (5.9%);
- short (5.9%);
- projects (5.9%).
- Maths exercises (27%);
- projects (18%);
- bring creative elements (18%);
- practice (9%);
- team homework (9%);
- are appreciated by teachers (9%).
- projects (27.3%);
- appreciated by teachers and colleagues (13.6%);
- short (13.6%);
- are completed (9.2%);
- involves creativity (9.1%);
- not involving much effort (9.1%);
- understood in the classroom (4.5%);
- in teams (4.5%);
- investigation (4.5%).

3.5. Checking and Assessing Homework

Learning CycleStudentsParentsTeachers
Classes
I–II
- students correct their homework together with their classmates, guided by the teacher, and congratulate each other (38.5%);
- positive or negative verbal comments are made (30.8%);
- teachers give them rewards on checked homework, based on accuracy (15.4%);
- homework is not checked daily and students become sad (7.7%);
- they give themselves pluses and minuses (7.7%), being sure that they did (less/fairly) well.
- don’t know how the assessment and verification is done, but are notified if problems occur (33%);
- homework is assessed and checked, and students’ work is validated (33%);
- homework is not checked daily and students are sad, and disheartened (17%);
- are rewarded with stickers and stickers, which are meant to make children happy (17%).
- give positive and constructive verbal feedback on homework (44.4%);
- stickers, stickers as rewards (33.3%);
- motivate students with good grades (22.2%).
Classes
III–IV
- homework is checked and corrected individually (38.5%), bringing the satisfaction of a job well done;
- students correct their homework together with their classmates, guided by the teacher, and congratulate each other (30.8%);
- students don’t get their homework checked every day and students get sad
(7.7%);
- give themselves pluses and minuses (23%), being confident that they did (less/fairly) well.
- do not know how homework is checked and assessed, but are notified if something is wrong (50.0%);
- homework is checked, but no daily assessment is given (37.5%);
- check, then make notes (12.5%).
- assess homework by awarding grades (33.3%);
- check and correct their homework in front (33.3%);
- correct the homework, then put “seen” (11.1%);
- check students out of homework when they take them to the blackboard (11.1%);
- checks and corrects their homework individually (11.1%).

3.6. Suggestions for Improving Educational Practices Regarding Homework

Learning CycleStudentsParentsTeachers
Classes
I–II
- creative homework (cutting, gluing, painting) (72.7%);
- doing homework as a game (18.2%);
- organization of team competitions (9.1%).
- some parents refrain and think teachers know better (33%);
homework in the form of a game (22%);
- team competition (11%);
- participation in training courses (11%);
- children should make suggestions, they are directly involved (11%);
- story context (11%).
- creative homework (cutting, gluing, painting) (25.0%);
- homework in the form of a game (16.7%);
- presentation of attractive material on the Internet (16.7%);
- alternating homework (16.7%);
- making worksheets more attractive (16.7%);
- replacing the word “homework” with something else (8.3%).
Classes
III–IV
- homework in the form of a game (22.7%);
- creative techniques (cutting, gluing, painting) (18.2%);
- creative writing (13.6%);
- documentation and elaboration of a project on a given homework (13.6%);
- dividing the class into three groups and giving three types of homework (9.1%);
-more attractive workplaces (9.1%);
- creating cards with homework ideas (4.5%);
- rewarding students (4.5%);
- diversification of homework (4.5%);
- use of digital applications (25.0%);
- homework in the form of a game (12.5%);
- team projects (12.5%);
- homework with a reference to modern-day reality (12.5%);
- homework in the form of an experiment (12.5%);
- homework in the form of competitions (12.5%);
- some parents abstain (12.5%).
- rewarding students (12.5%);
- better organization of after-school time (12.5%);
- diversifying homework (12.5%);
- children’s choice of homework (6.3%);
- a good combination of modern and traditional methods (6.3%);
- creating a suitable environment, free of distracting elements (6.3%);
-giving homework in the form of more attractive worksheets (6.3%);
- use of digital applications (6.3%);
- presentation of attractive material online (6.3%);
- not permitting the parent to intervene directly in the students’ homework (6.3%);
- creative homework (cutting, gluing, painting) (6.3%);
- homework in the form of competitions (6.3%);
- homework in the form of a game (6.3%).

4. Discussions

5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional reviewer board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

  • Rosário, P.; Núñez, J.C.; Vallejo, G.; Cunha, J.; Nunes, T.; Suárez, N.; Fuentes, S.; Moreira, T. The effects of teachers’ homework follow-up practices on students’ EFL performance: A randomized-group design. Front. Psychol. 2015 , 6 , 1528. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Williams, K.; Swift, J.; Williams, H.; Van Daal, V. Raising children’s self-efficacy through parental involvement in homework. Educ. Res. 2017 , 59 , 316–334. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tam, V.C.; Chu, P.; Tsang, V. Engaging in self-directed leisure activities during a homework-free holiday: Impacts on primary school children in Hong Kong. J. Glob. Educ. Res. 2023 , 7 , 64–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Moorhouse, B.L. Qualities of good homework activities: Teachers’ perceptions. ELT J. 2021 , 75 , 300–310. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • McGuire, S.Y.; McGuire, S. Teach Students How to Learn: Strategies You Can Incorporate into Any Course to Improve Student Metacognition, Study Skills, and Motivation , 1st ed.; Stylus Publishing: Sterling, VA, USA, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Sayers, J.; Petersson, J.; Marschall, G.; Andrews, P. Teachers’ perspectives on homework: Manifestations of culturally situated common sense. Educ. Rev. 2020 , 74 , 905–926. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Norhayati, E.; Rahya, R. Teacher’s Strategy in Shaping the Responsible Character of the Primary School Students toward Homework. Indones. J. Prim. Educ. Res. 2023 , 1 , 36–44. Available online: https://ejournal.aecindonesia.org/index.php/IJPER/article/view/6 (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  • Negru, I.; Sava, S. Reflections, perceptions and practices in formulating and evaluating homework in primary education. J. Pedag. 2022 , 52 , 93–120. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dolean, D.D.; Lervåg, A.; Visu-Petra, L.; Melby-Lervåg, M. Language skills, and not executive functions, predict the development of reading comprehension of early readers: Evidence from an orthographically transparent language. Read. Writ. 2021 , 34 , 1491–1512. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Syla, L.B. Perspectives of Primary Teachers, Students, and Parents on Homework. Educ. Res. Int. 2023 , 7669108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Moè, A.; Katz, I.; Cohen, R.; Alesi, M. Reducing homework stress by increasing adoption of need-supportive practices: Effects of an intervention with parents. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2020 , 82 , 101921. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rodríguez, S.; González-Suárez, R.; Vieites, T.; Piñeiro, I.; Díaz-Freire, F.M. Self-Regulation and Students Well-Being: A Systematic Review 2010. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 2346. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dettmers, S.; Yotyodying, S.; Jonkmann, K. Antecedents and Outcomes of Parental Homework Involvement: How Do Family-School Partnerships Affect Parental Homework Involvement and Student Outcomes? Front. Psychol. 2019 , 10 , 1048. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Epstein, J.L.; Van Voorhis, F.L. More Than Minutes: Teachers’ Roles in Designing Homework. Educ. Psychol. 2001 , 36 , 181–193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Medwell, J.; Wray, D. Primary homework in England: The beliefs and practices of teachers in primary schools. Int. J. Prim. Elem. Early Years Educ. 2018 , 47 , 191–204. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rodríguez, S.; Núñez, J.C.; Valle, A.; Freire, C.; Ferradás, M.d.M.; Rodríguez-Llorente, C. Relationship Between Students’ Prior Academic Achievement and Homework Behavioral Engagement: The Mediating/Moderating Role of Learning Motivation. Front. Psychol. 2019 , 10 , 1047. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • De Róiste, A.; Kelly, C.; Molcho, M.; Gavin, A.; Nic Gabhainn, S. Is school participation good for children? Associations with health and wellbeing. Health Educ. 2012 , 112 , 88–104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • OECD. Measuring What Matters for Child Well-Being and Policies ; OECD: Paris, France, 2021. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Anderson, D.L.; Graham, A.P. Improving student wellbeing: Having a say at school. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 2015 , 27 , 348–366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lewis, A. Examining the concept of well-being and early childhood: Adopting multi-disciplinary perspectives. J. Early Child. Res. 2019 , 17 , 294–308. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Aulia, F.; Hastjarjo, T.D.; Setiyawati, D.; Patria, B. Student Well-being: A Systematic Literature Review. Psychol. Bull. 2020 , 28 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wikman, C.; Allodi, M.W.; Ferrer-Wreder, L.A. Self-Concept, Prosocial School Behaviors, Well-Being, and Academic Skills in Elementary School Students: A Whole-Child Perspective. Educ. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Looney, J. Happiness in children: Measurement, correlates and enhancement of positive subjective well-being. Camb. J. Educ. 2014 , 45 , 393–394. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liu, Y.; Sang, B.; Liu, J.; Gong, S.; Ding, X. Parental support and homework emotions in Chinese children: Mediating roles of homework self-efficacy and emotion regulation strategies. Educ. Psychol. 2019 , 39 , 617–635. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Konu, A.; Rimpelä, M. Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Heal. Promot. Int. 2002 , 17 , 79–87. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Raghavan, R.; Alexandrova, A. Toward a Theory of Child Well-Being. Soc. Indic. Res. 2014 , 121 , 887–902. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ben-Arieh, A.; Casas, F.; Frønes, I.; Korbin, J.E. Multifaceted Concept of Child Well-Being. In Handbook of Child Well-Being. Theories, Methods, and Policies in Global Perspective ; Ben-Arieh, A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 1–27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Choi, A. Emotional Well-Being of Children and Adolescents: Recent Trends and Relevant Factors ; OEDC Education Working Papers; OEDC Publishing: Paris, France, 2018; p. 169. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Valle, A.; Piñeiro, I.; Rodríguez, S.; Regueiro, B.; Freire, C.; Rosário, P. Time spent and time management in homework in elementary school students: A person-centered approach. Psicothema 2019 , 31 , 422–428. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Institute of Education Sciences. Homework-National Consultation on the Role, Consistency, and Effectiveness of Homework. 2017. Available online: https://www.ise.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Raport_Teme-acasa_final.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  • Holland, M.; Courtney, M.; Vergara, J.; McIntyre, D.; Nix, S.; Marion, A.; Shergill, G. Homework and Children in Grades 3–6: Purpose, Policy and Non-Academic Impact. Child Youth Care Forum 2021 , 50 , 631–651. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhou, Y.; Siu, A.F.Y.; Tse, W.S. Influences of Unhealthy Sleep Behaviors on the Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Depressive Symptoms in Children. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2014 , 24 , 2120–2126. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Schrat Carr, N. Increasing the Effectiveness of Homework for All Learners in the Inclusive Classroom. Sch. Community J. 2013 , 23 , 169–182. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Calarco, J.M.; Horn, I.S.; Chen, G.A. “You Need to Be More Responsible”: The Myth of Meritocracy and Teachers’ Accounts of Homework Inequalities. Educ. Res. 2022 , 51 , 515–523. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rosário, P.; Cunha, J.; Nunes, T.; Nunes, A.R.; Moreira, T.; Núñez, J.C. “Homework Should Be…but We Do Not Live in an Ideal World”: Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives on Quality Homework and on Homework Assigned in Elementary and Middle Schools. Front. Psychol. 2019 , 10 , 6–7. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rønning, M. Who benefits from homework assignments? Econ. Educ. Rev. 2011 , 30 , 55–64. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cooper, H.; Robinson, J.C.; A Patall, E. Does Homework Improve Academic Achievement? A Synthesis of Research, 1987–2003. Rev. Educ. Res. 2006 , 76 , 1–62. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Fernández-Alonso, R.; Álvarez-Díaz, M.; García-Crespo, F.J.; Woitschach, P.; Muñiz, J. Should we Help our Children with Homework? A Meta-Analysis Using PISA Data. Psicothema 2022 , 34 , 56–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • O’keeffe, L.; Clarke, C.; McDonald, S.; Comber, B. Mathematics homework and the potential compounding of educational disadvantage. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 2023 , 44 , 1–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Solomon, Y.; Warin, J.; Lewis, C. Helping with Homework? Homework as a Site of Tension for Parents and Teenagers. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2002 , 28 , 603–622. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Watts, R.; Pattnaik, J. Perspectives of Parents and Teachers on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Children’s Socio-Emotional Well-Being. Early Child. Educ. J. 2022 , 50 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ma, X.; Shen, J.; Krenn, H.Y.; Hu, S.; Yuan, J. A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Learning Outcomes and Parental Involvement During Early Childhood Education and Early Elementary Education. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2015 , 28 , 771–801. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hampden-Thompson, G.; Guzman, L.; Lippman, L. A cross-national analysis of parental involvement and student literacy. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 2013 , 54 , 246–266. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Xu, J. Why Do Students Have Difficulties Completing Homework? The Need for Homework Management. J. Educ. Train. Stud. 2012 , 1 , 98–105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Katz, I.; Buzukashvili, T.; Feingold, L. Homework Stress: Construct Validation of a Measure. J. Exp. Educ. 2012 , 80 , 405–421. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kennewell, E.; Curtis, R.G.; Maher, C.; Luddy, S.; Virgara, R. The relationships between school children’s wellbeing, socio-economic disadvantage and after-school activities: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2022 , 22 , 297. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Payne, K.; Walton, E.; Burton, C. Steps to benefit from social prescription: A qualitative interview study. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2020 , 70 , e36–e44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bradley, M.; Harrel, M. Data Collection Methods. Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups ; RAND, National Security Research Division: Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Seidman, I. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences , 5th ed.; Teachers College Press, Columbia University: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
  • McNulty, K. The Impact of Homework on a Child’s Motivation to Learn in Primary Education. Ph.D. Thesis, Letterkenny Institute of Technology, Donegal, Ireland, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Costa, M.; Cardoso, A.P.; Lacerda, C.; Lopes, A.; Gomes, C. Homework in Primary Education from the Perspective of Teachers and Pupils. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016 , 217 , 139–148. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Grant, K.B.; Ray, J.A. Home, School, and Community Collaboration-Culturally Responsive Family Engagement , 4th ed.; SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Sheridan, S.M.; Smith, T.E.; Kim, E.M.; Beretvas, S.N.; Park, S. A Meta-Analysis of Family-School Interventions and Children’s Social-Emotional Functioning: Moderators and Components of Efficacy. Rev. Educ. Res. 2019 , 89 , 296–332. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Holte, K.L. Homework in Primary School: Could It Be Made More Child-Friendly? Stud. Paedagog. 2016 , 21 , 13–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Clarke, V.; Braun, V. Thematic analysis. J. Posit. Psychol. 2017 , 12 , 297–298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cunha, J.; Rosario, P.; Macedo, L.; Nunes, A.R.; Fuentes, S.; Pinto, R.; Suarez, N. Parents’ conceptions of their homework involvement in elementary school. Psychothema 2015 , 27 , 159–165. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kaldi, S.; Filippatou, D.; Govaris, C. Project-based learning in primary schools: Effects on pupils’ learning and attitudes. Int. J. Prim. Elem. Early Years Educ. 2011 , 39 , 35–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tam, V.C.; Chan, R.M.C. What Is Homework For? Hong Kong Primary School Teachers’ Homework Conceptions. Sch. Community J. 2016 , 26 , 25–44. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Locke, J.Y.; Kavanagh, D.J.; Campbell, M.A. Overparenting and Homework: The Student’s Task, But Everyone’s Responsibility. J. Psychol. Couns. Sch. 2016 , 26 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Monsillion, J.; Zebdi, R.; Romo-Desprez, L. School Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Youth, and Considerations for Anxiety, Depression, and a Positive School Climate—A Systematic Literature Review. Children 2023 , 10 , 861. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
ThemeSubtheme
Homeworks not popular with studentsHomework given in the non-preferred subject;
A lot of effort;
Difficult homework;
Long and tedious homework;
Repetitive homework;
Homework with limits.
Students’ reactions when they don’t know how to do homeworkThey feel bad and blame themselves when they forget information;
They are disappointed;
They get upset when they can’t play;
It builds frustration;
Take a break and resume afterward;
Ask parents to help them;
They take an interest in solving it;
They lose confidence in their strength.
Feel-good homeworksHomework that involves the use of imagination;
Homework that appeals to real life;
Homework that makes children stand out;
Creative homework;
Homework that increases their confidence in their strengths;
Homework is given a choice;
Homework containing reading elements.
Homeworks students loveHomework containing elements of reading or writing, preferably with creative elements;
Homework that makes children feel valued;
The preparation homework for the evaluation, with self-evaluation grid;
Homework containing exercises in mathematics;
Attractive homework;
Short homework;
Projects.
Checking and assessing homeworkStudents check their homework with their classmate;
Positive or negative verbal praise is given;
Teachers reward for fairness;
Pluses and minuses are given;
Homework is not checked daily and students become sad;
Homework is checked individually.
Suggestions for improvementAssigning creative homework (decoupage, gluing, painting);
Making homework in the form of a game;
Organising competitions;
Documenting and developing a project on a given homework;
Homework containing elements of literary creation;
Dividing the class into three groups and assigning three types of homework;
Creating cards with homework ideas.
ThemeSubtheme
Homeworks not popular with studentsHomework with imposed limits;
Repetitive homework;
Long and tedious homework;
Homework that takes a lot of effort;
Homework is considered difficult;
Homework considered uninteresting;
Homework that put them in difficulty.
Students’ reactions when they don’t know how to carry out homeworkHe flatly refuses to do them;
Children cry;
They get demotivated very quickly;
They get discouraged and ask their parents to help them;
They admit they don’t know, but try;
Child gets angry;
They take an interest in solving them;
I honestly don’t know;
They are disappointed;
Child takes a break and resume afterward;
She leaves her notebook at home with intent;
Students ask for help.
Feel-good homeworksHomework that involves the use of imagination;
Homework that makes students feel valued;
Homework that appeals to real life;
Homework that is related to practical things;
Homework to be checked with the teacher;
Homework negotiated with the teacher;
Homework in which a funny story is found;
The projects they present to the class;
Homework for which they are rewarded;
Replacing the word ‘homework’ with something else;
Team homework;
Homework of investigation on a specific topic;
Creative homework;
Easy homework that is effortless to complete;
Homework in the form of debates;
Differentiated homework;
Homework that increases their confidence in their strengths.
Homework students lovePractical homework;
Homework that they do themselves;
Homework that can be solved in a relatively short time;
Attractive homework;
Homeworks containing creative elements;
Homework in the form of maths exercises;
Homework in the form of a game;
Homeworks containing elements of reading or writing;
Homework that sparks curiosity;
Project homework;
Homework appreciated by teachers and colleagues;
Homeworks that are carried through;
Homework that doesn’t involve much effort;
Homework understood in class;
Team homework;
Homeworks of investigation.
Checking and assessing homeworkI give positive and constructive verbal feedback;
Stickers, stickers, and dots are awarded as rewards;
They motivate students with good grades;
Evaluate homework by awarding grades;
They check and correct their homework upfront;
Correct the homework, then put “seen”;
They check students off homework when they take them to the blackboard;
They check and correct their homework individually.
Suggestions for improvementHomework in game form;
Presentation of attractive material from the Internet;
Alternating homework;
Making worksheets more attractive;
Replacing the word ‘homework’ with something else;
Rewarding students;
Efficient time organization;
Diversifying homework;
Children’s choice of homework;
Good combination of modern and traditional methods;
Creating a suitable environment without distracting elements;
Using digital applications;
Parents don’t interfere in students’ homework;
Creative homework (decoupage, gluing, painting);
Homework in the form of competitions.
ThemeSubtheme
Homeworks not popular with studentsHomework that put them in difficulty;
Difficult homework, above the student’s level of knowledge;
Homework given in a non-preferred subject;
Homework they put a lot of effort into;
Homework that makes students feel insecure about their strengths;
Homework with limits;
Homework that is not appreciated.
Students’ reactions when they don’t know how to do homeworkThe students resume their work after calm discussions, although they are disappointed;
Students cry when they can’t cope;
Students are disappointed when they don’t do well;
Students are stressed;
Students are losing patience;
Students get demotivated very quickly;
Students flatly refuse to do them;
Students gather frustrations;
Students take a break and restart afterward;
Students get discouraged and ask parents to help them.
Feel-good homeworksPreparatory homework for competitions;
Homework to prepare for classroom assessments;
Homework that makes children feel valued;
Homework that involves the use of imagination;
Homework that is related to practical things;
Homework done in teams.
Homework students loveMaths exercises;
Homework involving elements of reading;
Homework in the form of projects;
Homework that brings creative elements;
Practical homework;
Team homework;
Homework that is appreciated by teachers.
Checking and assessing homeworkHomework is not checked daily and students become sad;
Some parents don’t know how to assess and check;
Rewarding with polka dots and stickers;
Homework is assessed and checked especially at after-school;
Homework is checked, then marked;
Homework is checked, but not graded daily.
Suggestions for improvementParents refrain;
Homework in game form;
Team competition;
Participation of teachers in training courses;
Children should give suggestions;
Story context;
Using digital applications;
Team projects;
Homework regarding the reality of our days;
Homework in the form of an experiment;
Homework in the form of competitions.
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Negru, I.; Sava, S. Homework’s Implications for the Well-Being of Primary School Pupils—Perceptions of Children, Parents, and Teachers. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100996

Negru I, Sava S. Homework’s Implications for the Well-Being of Primary School Pupils—Perceptions of Children, Parents, and Teachers. Education Sciences . 2023; 13(10):996. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100996

Negru, Iasmina, and Simona Sava. 2023. "Homework’s Implications for the Well-Being of Primary School Pupils—Perceptions of Children, Parents, and Teachers" Education Sciences 13, no. 10: 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100996

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Keep It Real: A Student Perspective on Homework

students perspective on homework

  • Share article

Dominick Recckio, an accomplished high school student who blogs for Edutopia, surveyed students at his school on their homework habits and then wrote up some tips for both teachers and students on easing the nightly process. Within the post, he offers this reminder that students are often appreciative and receptive when teachers put work in a real-world context:

What could be a better way of answering students' biggest question—"When am I ever going to use this?"—than by showing them? There are many ways this could be done. Teachers could assign students the task of finding their own applications of certain principles at home, such as how electrical circuits can illustrate a concept for physics class, or how chemistry is applied in the kitchen. Or you could give them a list of things to notice at home or around town. For example, my town is right on the Erie Canal, and it has more heritage and history than most small towns. But when we study the era in history class, we never go out of the building and realize that it's right there.

While none of Recckio’s insights are revolutionary, perhaps they carry extra weight coming from a high school student than from another teacher or PD presenter. Thoughts?

A version of this news article first appeared in the Teaching Now blog.

Sign Up for The Savvy Principal

Illinois Wesleyan University Logo

  • Help & FAQ

Understanding English Homework from High School Students’ Perspectives

  • Illinois Wesleyan University

Research output : Faculty Advisor of Undergraduate Research

Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - Apr 2009
  • English language arts
  • students' perceptions

Disciplines

  • Secondary Education and Teaching

T1 - Understanding English Homework from High School Students’ Perspectives

AU - Allen, Laura

AU - Pilotte, Nicole

AU - Leavitt, Robin

AU - Nillas, Leah A.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Current research on homework is missing the student perspective. This study aims to understand high school students’ perceptions of English homework and how we as teachers can promote students’ understanding and completion of homework. We surveyed fifty students, from two Midwestern high schools, to determine students’ feelings about homework, their motivation for completing assignments, and their preferences in homework design and assessment. Results suggest that students have negative associations with homework, despite thinking it is helpful and reinforces what is learned in class. In addition, grades are students’ primary motivation for completing homework, and time constraints due to extracurricular activities and other demanding classes is their primary reason for not completing their English homework. These findings suggest that students have the most positive experiences with English homework when they have adequate time to complete it, they receive formal feedback rather than completion points, assignments have a clear purpose that assists in students’ understanding of class material, and their preferences are acknowledged and taken into consideration when designing assignments.

AB - Current research on homework is missing the student perspective. This study aims to understand high school students’ perceptions of English homework and how we as teachers can promote students’ understanding and completion of homework. We surveyed fifty students, from two Midwestern high schools, to determine students’ feelings about homework, their motivation for completing assignments, and their preferences in homework design and assessment. Results suggest that students have negative associations with homework, despite thinking it is helpful and reinforces what is learned in class. In addition, grades are students’ primary motivation for completing homework, and time constraints due to extracurricular activities and other demanding classes is their primary reason for not completing their English homework. These findings suggest that students have the most positive experiences with English homework when they have adequate time to complete it, they receive formal feedback rather than completion points, assignments have a clear purpose that assists in students’ understanding of class material, and their preferences are acknowledged and taken into consideration when designing assignments.

KW - homework

KW - English language arts

KW - students' perceptions

M3 - Faculty Advisor of Undergraduate Research

Analyzing ‘the homework gap’ among high school students

Subscribe to the brown center on education policy newsletter, michael hansen and michael hansen senior fellow - brown center on education policy , the herman and george r. brown chair - governance studies diana quintero diana quintero former senior research analyst, brown center on education policy - the brookings institution, ph.d. student - vanderbilt university.

August 10, 2017

Researchers have struggled for decades to identify a causal, or even correlational, relationship between time spent in school and improved learning outcomes for students. Some studies have focused on the length of a school year while others have focused on hours in a day and others on hours in the week .

In this blog post, we will look at time spent outside of school–specifically time spent doing homework–among different racial and socio-economic groups. We will use data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) to shed light on those differences and then attempt to explain those gaps, using ATUS data and other evidence.

What we know about out-of-school time

Measuring the relationship between out-of-school time and outcomes like test scores can be difficult. Researchers are primarily confounded by an inability to determine what compels students to choose homework during their time off over other activities. Are those who spend more time on homework just extra motivated? Or are they struggling students who need to work harder to keep up? What role do social expectations from parents or peers play?

Previous studies have examined the impact of this outside time use on educational outcomes for students. A 2007 study using data from Berea College in Kentucky identified a causal relationship between hours spent studying and a student’s academic performance through an interesting measure. The researchers took advantage of randomly assigned college roommates, paying attention to those who came to campus with a video game console in tow. They hypothesized students randomly assigned to a roommate without a video game console would study more, since all other factors remained equal. That hypothesis held up, and that group also received significantly higher grades, demonstrating the causal relationship.

Other research has relied on data collected through the American Time Use Survey, a study of how Americans spend their time, and shown the existence of a gender gap and a parental education gap in homework time. Other studies have looked at the relationship between holding a job and student’s time use in discretionary activities , like sleep, media consumption, and time spent on homework. We are curious about out-of-school differences in homework time by race and income.

Descriptive statistics of time use

We began with a general sample of 2,575 full-time high school students between the ages of 15 and 18 from the ATUS, restricting the sample to their answers about time spent on homework during weekdays and school months (September to May). Among all high school students surveyed (those that reported completing their homework and those that did not), the time allocated to complete homework amounted to less than an hour per day, despite the fact that high school teachers report they assign an average of 3.5 hours of homework per day.

To explore racial or income-based differences, in Figure 1, we plot the minutes that students reporting spending on homework separately by their racial/ethnic group and family income. We observed a time gap between racial groups, with Asian students spending the most time on homework (nearly two hours a day). Similarly, we observe a time gap by the students’ family income.

Time high school students spend on homework by race and parents' income

We can also use ATUS data to isolate when students do homework by race and by income. In Figure 2, we plot the percentage of high school students in each racial and income group doing homework by the time of day. Percentages remain low during the school day and then expectedly increase when students get home, with more Asian students doing more homework and working later into the night than other racial groups. Low-income students reported doing less homework per hour than their non-low-income peers.

Percentage of high school students doing homework by time of day, race, and income

Initial attempts to explain the homework gap

We hypothesized that these racial and income-based time gaps could potentially be explained by other factors, like work, time spent caring for others, and parental education. We tested these hypotheses by separating groups based on particular characteristics and comparing the average number of minutes per day spent on homework amongst the comparison groups.

Students who work predictably reported spending less time on educational activities, so if working disproportionately affected particular racial or income groups, then work could help explain the time gap. Students who worked allocated on average 20 minutes less for homework than their counterparts who did not work. Though low-income students worked more hours than their peers, they largely maintained a similar level of homework time by reducing their leisure or extracurricular activities. Therefore, the time gap on homework changed only slightly with the inclusion of work as a factor.

We also incorporated time spent taking care of others in the household. Though a greater percentage of low-income students take care of other household members, we found that this does not have a statistically significant effect on homework because students reduce leisure, rather than homework, in an attempt to help their families. Therefore, this variable again does not explain the time gaps.

Finally, we considered parental education, since parents with more education have been shown to encourage their children to value school more and have the resources to ensure homework is completed more easily. Our analysis showed students with at least one parent with any post-secondary degree (associate or above) reported spending more time on homework than their counterparts whose parents do not hold a degree; however, gaps by race still existed, even holding parental education constant. Turning to income levels, we found that parental education is more correlated with homework time among low-income students, reducing the time gap between income groups to only eight minutes.

Societal explanations

Our analysis of ATUS could not fully explain this gap in time spent on homework, especially among racial groups. Instead, we believe that viewing homework as an outcome of the culture of the school and the expectations of teachers, rather than an outcome of a student’s effort, may provide some reasons for its persistence.

Many studies, including recent research , have shown that teachers perceive students of color as academically inferior to their white peers. A 2016 study by Seth Gershenson et al. showed that this expectations gap can also depend on the race of the teacher. In a country where minority students make up nearly half of all public school students, yet minority teachers comprise just 18 percent of the teacher workforce, these differences in expectations matter.

Students of color are also less likely to attend high schools that offer advanced courses (including Advanced Placement courses) that would likely assign more homework, and thus access to rigorous courses may partially explain the gaps as well.

Research shows a similar, if less well-documented, gap by income, with teachers reporting lower expectations and dimmer futures for their low-income students. Low-income students and students of color may be assigned less homework based on lower expectations for their success, thus preventing them from learning as much and creating a self-fulfilling prophecy .

In conclusion, these analyses of time use revealed a substantial gap in homework by race and by income group that could not be entirely explained by work, taking care of others, or parental education. Additionally, differences in educational achievement, especially as measured on standardized tests, have been well-documented by race and by income . These gaps deserve our attention, but we should be wary of blaming disadvantaged groups. Time use is an outcome reflecting multiple factors, not simply motivation, and a greater understanding of that should help raise expectations–and therefore, educational achievement–all around.

Sarah Novicoff contributed to this post.

Related Content

Michael Hansen, Diana Quintero

October 5, 2016

Sarah Novicoff, Matthew A. Kraft

November 15, 2022

September 10, 2015

K-12 Education

Governance Studies

Brown Center on Education Policy

Andrew J. Seligsohn, Rebecca Silliman

August 19, 2024

Online only

9:30 am - 11:00 am EDT

Douglas N. Harris

August 13, 2024

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

International Perspectives on Student Outcomes and Homework

International Perspectives on Student Outcomes and Homework

DOI link for International Perspectives on Student Outcomes and Homework

Get Citation

This synthesis of the latest knowledge on homework presents unique findings by researchers from various countries and diverse professional backgrounds.  It approaches the topic of homework from several perspectives, including

  • its political and cultural contexts
  • aspects of parental involvement and parent-child relationships
  • school contexts and practices
  • observable impacts

It highlights homework-specific concerns and considers two principal solutions.  Firstly, support initiatives from schools and communities.  Secondly, improved homework design, aimed at attracting greater student interest and promoting communication within families. Recommendations for practice and future research are also discussed.

A political analysis shows that current confusion about homework might stem from a tension between two prevailing ideologies, one stressing students’ improved achievement in competing economies, and the other privileging collaboration between the school, family and community. This book considers how both teachers and parents can ensure a balance between the child’s school life and his or her overall development. Certain community resources are available to parents and students, but these in no way absolve parents of the responsibility to maintain an interest in their child’s school activities.

International Perspectives on Student Outcomes and Homework proposes ideas and actions of relevance to everyone interested in the issue: school administrations, teachers in training and in practice, parents, and researchers eager to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field.  It is a perfect companion to International Perspectives on Contexts, Communities and Evaluated Innovative Practices , also edited by Rollande Deslandes, and published simultaneously by Routledge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter | 6  pages, introduction, chapter 1 | 18  pages, homework in denmark: what kind of links between family and school, chapter 2 | 14  pages, parental involvement supports better student learning, chapter 3 | 8  pages, parents and children’s homework in france, chapter 4 | 14  pages, parents’ perspectives on homework: united kingdom, new zealand, australia and japan, chapter 5 | 15  pages, homework, gender, and family–school relations, chapter 6 | 19  pages, mind the gap greek- cypriot parents and their children’s homework, chapter 7 | 15  pages, parent–child dyad’s representations regarding homework and primary pupils’ views of parental involvement in homework, chapter 8 | 18  pages, homework management reported by secondary school students: a multilevel analysis, chapter 9 | 13  pages, elementary school teachers’ views of homework and parents–school relations, chapter 10 | 16  pages, does family involvement in homework make a difference investigating the longitudinal effects of math and language arts interventions.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Taylor & Francis Online
  • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Students/Researchers
  • Librarians/Institutions

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2024 Informa UK Limited

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

  • You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
  • You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
  • You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
  • A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

IMAGES

  1. student perspectives on homework

    students perspective on homework

  2. The Student Perspective on: Homework

    students perspective on homework

  3. How to Help Middle and High School Students Develop the Skills They

    students perspective on homework

  4. Building Skills Through Homework: A Perspective

    students perspective on homework

  5. Group Students Discussing Homework View Above Stock Photo 364952228

    students perspective on homework

  6. College Student Doing Homework

    students perspective on homework

COMMENTS

  1. PDF Adolescents' Experience Doing Homework: Associations Among Context

    The student perspective has been missing from research on homework in particular (Warton, 2001) just as it has been from most other educational pub-lications and policy discussions (Phelan, Davidson, & Yu, 1998). The idea that educators must understand learner's perceptions and perspective about edu-cational activities is central to contemporary constructivist theories (Daniels & Shumow ...

  2. [PDF] Student Perspectives on Homework.

    Student Perspectives on Homework. Introduction and Background Information Teachers are finding that a number of students do not complete homework assignments for various reasons, and have long experienced the frustration of students who do not or will not complete their homework assignments. This is not a new problem as this phenomenon has been ...

  3. Stanford research shows pitfalls of homework

    A Stanford researcher found that students in high-achieving communities who spend too much time on homework experience more stress, physical health problems, a lack of balance and even alienation ...

  4. PDF Students' Perspectives on Homework and Problem Sets in STEM Courses

    Getting a comprehensive understanding of students' perspectives about STEM homework could provide insight into how all members of the STEM community could work to make the experience better, which could lead to deeper learning, stronger connections, and increased excitement in students about their STEM experience.

  5. Perspectives of Primary Teachers, Students, and Parents on Homework

    20 teachers, 20 students, and 20 parents of the fifth-grade primary school in four municipalities of Kosovo. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and were analyzed through the thematic analysis method. The research results provided an overview of the reality of the way teachers approached homework.

  6. PDF Increasing the Effectiveness of Homework for All Learners in the ...

    Increasing the efectiveness of homework is a multifaceted goal. Accom-modations, organization, structure of assignments, technology, home-school communication, and students' home life all influence the efectiveness of homework. Teachers are often given the additional challenge of diferentiating instruction for students with a wide range of abilities and varying exception-alities. Studies ...

  7. Is Homework Good for Kids? Here's What the Research Says

    The correlation was stronger for older students—in seventh through 12th grade—than for those in younger grades, for whom there was a weak relationship between homework and performance.

  8. Discrepancies Between Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of Homework

    For homework to help students improve school achievement and develop responsibility and autonomy in academic endeavors in and out of school, the development of teachers' understanding of students' views about homework and their homework behaviors is critical.

  9. Education Sciences

    Teachers and educational researchers explore various approaches to make homework more engaging and enjoyable, intending to improve the well-being and academic performance of primary school students. The study aimed to identify practices with positive and negative effects on students' well-being when doing homework. The views of those involved in giving, doing, and assessing homework were ...

  10. Doing Homework: Perspectives of Elementary and Junior High School Students

    A survey of homework experiences was administered to 1,527 elementary and junior high students in regular (n = 1,242), resource (n = 234), and self-contained special education (n = 51) classrooms. ...

  11. Keep It Real: A Student Perspective on Homework

    Keep It Real: A Student Perspective on Homework. By Liana Loewus — June 26, 2012 1 min read. Dominick Recckio, an accomplished high school student who blogs for Edutopia, surveyed students at ...

  12. (PDF) Investigating the Effects of Homework on Student Learning and

    In this article, we will explore the effects of homework on student learning and academic performance, drawing from recent research and studies. One of the key arguments in favor of homework is ...

  13. PDF Student Perspectives on Homework

    Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON HOMEWORK Wilson, Jan;Rhodes, John Education; Winter 2010; 131, 2; ProQuest pg. 351 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

  14. Understanding English Homework from High School Students' Perspectives

    Current research on homework is missing the student perspective. This study aims to understand high school students' perceptions of English homework and how we as teachers can promote students' understanding and completion of homework.

  15. Students Perception Of Homework Assignments And What ...

    Consequently, students perception of homework, the principal participants, remains largely unknown. Students experience in homework that started as early as elementary school has influenced their ...

  16. Analyzing 'the homework gap' among high school students

    Analyzing 'the homework gap' among high school students. Researchers have struggled for decades to identify a causal, or even correlational, relationship between time spent in school and ...

  17. Teachers' perspectives on homework: manifestations of culturally

    This paper presents an exploratory study of English and Swedish teachers' perspectives on the role of homework in year-one children's learning of number. In order to ensure cultural integrity, data...

  18. Perspectives of Primary Teachers, Students, and Parents on Homework

    The purpose of this research was to examine the experiences of teachers, students, and parents on homework purpose and student feedback in primary school. The qualitative methodology was adopted for ...

  19. Perceptions Of The Effects Of Homework On Student Achievement At A

    ABSTRACT The purpose of this program evaluation was to gain a clear understanding of how homework supports or deters the achievement of students, specifically the overall grade a student attains. This document details how students and teachers at a suburban Middle School perceive homework and its effect on student learning. The findings were that

  20. International Perspectives on Student Outcomes and Homework

    It approaches the topic of homework from several perspectives, including. It highlights homework-specific concerns and considers two principal solutions. Firstly, support initiatives from schools and communities. Secondly, improved homework design, aimed at attracting greater student interest and promoting communication within families.

  21. Student-perceived parental help with homework: Identifying student

    Overall, students with higher perceived parental help (particularly relating to autonomy support) put forth more homework effort, procrastinated less, and scored higher on mathematics achievement. Implications for future studies and homework practices are considered with regard to these findings.

  22. Research Proposal

    Research Questions What are parent and teacher perspectives on the primary purposes of homework? What are the different perceptions on the amount of time students spend on homework, between teachers, parents, and students? What is the ideal amount of time students, parents, and teachers believe students should spend completing homework? Does homework affect family time, such as quality of time ...

  23. Balanced Perspectives on Homework in Education

    Assignment 5 Quote Sandwich Jennifer McVeigh Eng 102 June 2024 Quote Sandwich 1: Christina Rinaldi, a child psychologist and professor of education and psychology at the University of Alberta, offered a nuanced perspective on the role of homework in education. She argued that eliminating homework entirely is impractical, noting, "To say you got rid of homework is unrealistic because any work ...

  24. Latest T-Mobile News, Offers & Devices

    Your official source for the latest T-Mobile news and updates, along with the newest devices, offers, and stories from the world of T-Mobile.