research paper about space

IEEE Account

• Change Username/Password
• Update Address

Purchase Details

• Payment Options
• Order History
• View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

• Communications Preferences
• Profession and Education
• Technical Interests
• US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
• Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
• Contact & Support
• About IEEE Xplore
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Nondiscrimination Policy
• Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

Frontiers | Science News

• Science News

Research Topics

Reach for the stars: research topics on space exploration.

With recent advances in commercial space exploration, we have curated a list of our best Research Topics on outer space. Explore collections edited by experts from NASA, The Goddard Space Flight Center, Space Science Institute, German Aerospace Center, Canadian Space Agency, National Space Science Center, European Space Agency, International Space University, and many more.

Research Topics:

Optimization of Exercise Countermeasures for Human Space Flight – Lessons from Terrestrial Physiology and Operational Implementation

Biology in Space: Challenges and Opportunities

Microbiology of Extreme and Human-Made Confined Environments (Spacecraft, Space Stations, Cleanrooms, and Analogous Sites)

Geospace Observation of Natural Hazards

Astrobiology of Mars, Europa, Titan and Enceladus - Most Likely Places for Alien Life

Imagining the Future of Astronomy and Space Science

Brains in Space: Effects of Spaceflight on the Human Brain and Behavior

Creative Performance in Extreme Human Environments: Astronauts and Space

Space Traffic Management: a new era in Earth orbit

Wound Management and Healing in Space

Robotic Manipulation and Capture in Space

A Multidisciplinary Approach to designing Sensorimotor Adaptation countermeasures for space exploration missions

Active Experiments in Space: Past, Present, and Future

On-orbit Manufacturing and Assembly Technologies for Future Space Activities

Current and Future Instrumentation for the Detection and Identification of Signatures of Life on Mars and Beyond

On-Orbit Servicing and Active Debris Removal: Enabling a Paradigm Shift in Spaceflight

Space Weather with Small Satellites

AI in the Space Sciences

Higher Plants, Algae and Cyanobacteria in Space Environments

Post related info

October 11, 2021

Frontiers Communications

Post categories, space sciences and astronomy, related subjects, research topics, related content.

Life from Earth could temporarily survive on Mars

Meet a team of scientists working to prevent interplanetary pollution that could pose a threat to life on Earth and other planets

NASA space data can cut disaster response times, costs

Latest posts.

Men infected with high-risk types of HPV could struggle with fertility

Prof Carl Kocher explores how you can stretch your mind to grasp quantum entanglement

Arts and crafts improves your mental health as much as having a job, scientists find

Youth + technology: three Research Topics on empowering the next generation

Microbes conquer the next extreme environment: your microwave

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Review Article
• Open access
• Published: 25 March 2023

Toward the utilisation of resources in space: knowledge gaps, open questions, and priorities

• Jan Cilliers 1   na1 ,
• Kathryn Hadler 1 , 2   na1 &
• Joshua Rasera   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0136-3308 1   na1  

npj Microgravity volume  9 , Article number:  22 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

3251 Accesses

6 Citations

3 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Engineering
• Scientific community

There are many open science questions in space resource utilisation due to the novelty and relative immaturity of the field. While many potential technologies have been proposed to produce usable resources in space, high confidence, large-scale design is limited by gaps in the knowledge of the local environmental conditions, geology, mineralogy, and regolith characteristics, as well as specific science questions intrinsic to each process. Further, the engineering constraints (e.g. energy, throughput, efficiency etc.) must be incorporated into the design. This work aims to summarise briefly recent activities in the field of space resource utilisation, as well as to identify key knowledge gaps, and to present open science questions. Finally, future exploration priorities to enable the use of space resources are highlighted.

Similar content being viewed by others

Toward sustainable space exploration: a roadmap for harnessing the power of microorganisms

Exploring outer space biophysical phenomena via SpaceLID

Microbial biomanufacturing for space-exploration—what to take and when to make

Introduction.

The use of space resources is critical for the future of long-term and deep-space exploration. Space exploration presents challenges for sustainability; single-use launchers, non-refuelable satellites, and a need for all hardware and consumables to be supplied from Earth, all add appreciable resource use and cost to space programmes. Fortunately, significant progress is being made: SpaceX are Blue Origin are demonstrating the value of re-usable launch systems 1 ; on-orbit refuelling is being developed by start-ups such as Orbit Fab and Orbital Express, as well as established actors, such as Airbus and Busek 2 .

The use of space resources to provide propellant, habitation and materials critical to support human life (e.g. water, oxygen) will unlock the full potential of space exploration, enabling humans to travel further and spend longer in space 3 , 4 , 5 . This will transform the economics of space exploration.

The use of space resources, known as in situ resource utilisation (ISRU), or more generally as space resource utilisation (SRU), is not a new concept. A detailed history of SRU is provided by Meurisse and Carpenter 6 . In brief, the utilisation of space resources was first suggested by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, widely considered the originator of modern approaches to rocketry, in 1903 7 , 8 . Lunar SRU was proposed by Clarke 9 in the 1950s. During the Apollo Era in the 1960s, SRU was suggested by Carr 10 as a practical means to reduce launch mass and terrestrial dependency. In the subsequent 50 years, the concept has grown in maturity. Many terrestrial studies have been undertaken to design and test candidate technologies (e.g., refs. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ).

As of 2022, SRU has been demonstrated only once in space, despite these technologies playing an key role in ESA’s and NASA’s space exploration road maps 12 , 18 . The MOXIE ( M ars OX ygen I SRU E xperiment) payload on board NASA’s Perseverance Rover produced oxygen from Mars’ CO 2 -rich atmosphere in 2021 by solid oxide electrolysis 19 . Lunar SRU demonstration missions are under development (e.g., refs. 20 , 21 ), and preliminary missions to test new SRU legal and economic frameworks are scheduled throughout 2023, for example ispace inc.’s HAKUTO-R Mission 1, currently en route to the Moon 22 , 23 .

Today, accessing and using space resources is a focus of many space agencies 18 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , governments 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , intergovernmental organisations 32 , 33 , and private industry 34 , 35 , 36 . More recently, there has been renewed interest in SRU for a number of applications, such as:

Producing oxygen and metals on the Moon and Mars (e.g. refs. 19 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 );

Extracting water from the lunar poles (e.g. refs. 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 );

Extracting water, volatiles and metals from near-Earth objects (e.g. refs. 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 );

Construction of habitats and thermal shelters, including by additive manufacturing (e.g. refs. 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ); and,

The manufacture of equipment and technology from local resources (e.g. refs. 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ).

Demonstration-scale SRU projects are a viable, necessary first step for the industry. Their success will broaden appreciably the knowledge base of the SRU and lunar science communities. Detailed knowledge of the local geology, mineralogy and regolith characteristics will enhance greatly confidence in the designs of mining, extraction and production systems at an industrial scale. Other science questions, intrinsic to each specific process, should be addressed to optimise the design of industrial-scale systems. Both the environmental operating conditions (e.g., local electrostatic and radiation environments) and engineering constraints (e.g. energy use, required throughput, expected efficiency, etc.) will affect equipment designs significantly 77 ). The success of large-scale resource utilisation processes is dependent therefore on a sufficient knowledge of the specific resource and region of interest, as well as the technology capability required to extract useful products.

This work was developed following the European Space Agency’s SciSpacE Space Resources White Paper exercise. Here, knowledge gaps, open science questions, and research priorities for the lunar science and SRU communities are identified. As the capabilities and limitations of SRU are clarified through in situ demonstrations, it will be possible to address many of these gaps and questions, and in doing so, will improve greatly the development of large-scale SRU technologies. Furthermore, answering these questions will provide tremendous value to the scientific community.

The SRU process

The extraction and use of space resources is analogous to the extraction and use of terrestrial resources 78 , 79 . First, the given resource (e.g. oxygen, water ice) must be identified through prospecting and ground truth exploration to increase certainty 80 , 81 . The composition of the surrounding material and the characteristics of the specific resource within that host material must be understood. The variability in the distribution of the resource in a given region is also required. For example, water ice present within regolith or buried under regolith at the lunar poles varies both spatially and by depth 50 , 82 . Adopting suitably modified terrestrial industry standards and best practices for exploration and reporting (e.g., JORC and LORS 81 ), as well as common terminology 78 will encourage participation of, and attract investment from non-space actors in SRU.

The chain of technologies linked together to process a particular ore body on Earth is described by a flowsheet 78 . The flowsheet can be subdivided broadly into three key stages: excavation, beneficiation, and extraction of the final product 78 . Excavation has been explored thoroughly in the literature 83 , as have extraction methods 84 . Beneficiation is the process in which mined material is broken or agglomerated and classified by size into a range suitable for further processing, and also to concentrate one component of interest (e.g. water or ilmenite) by physical removal of undesired components. The beneficiation of mined space material into a form suitable for extraction of the require final product has been studied far less in comparison 85 .

In terrestrial mining, the resource, the surrounding material, the location, and the technology used to extract the resource are matched in the process flowsheet such that either:

The specific resource and its location are targeted depending on available technology; or,

The technology is designed to meet the extraction requirements of a specific target resource.

Demonstration missions to prove SRU technologies and to raise TRLs have immense value for characterising the potential inputs to the flowsheet. However, the characteristics of resource host material on the Moon, Mars or elsewhere in space are also key inputs to flowsheet design. The processing technologies required must be chosen to maximise confidence in the production levels of the resource as well as the overall operational efficiency. It is inappropriate to assume that a ‘one size fits all’ approach to excavation, beneficiation and extraction would be suitable for SRU. Terrestrial mining operations select carefully the mining equipment used based on the characteristics of the target resource; a SRU will benefit undoubtedly from adopting a similar approach.

Space resource utilisation requires engineering solutions to produce a reliable supply of usable products from a naturally variable feedstock 77 . The use of mineral resources for SRU remains untested anywhere in space, however this will change in the coming years with demonstration missions (e.g. PROSPECT), the exploration of the lunar poles, and NASA’s upcoming regolith collection missions 20 , 22 . For SRU to become a realisable option for future space travel, it will be important for early demonstration missions to address as many open science questions as possible, as this will enable ultimately the implementation of SRU at an industrial scale.

Data: the key knowledge gap

There remain many aspects of SRU that are poorly quantified, through lack of available data and samples, and limitations with demonstrating space technologies on the surface of the Earth. The data required to enable SRU in the future can be categorised into two groups: environmental data and resource data. Such data will further have intrinsic scientific value.

Environmental data are critical for the development of robust equipment with high operational availability and long-term usage in mind. Deep knowledge of the local environmental conditions will impact directly the design choices made to ensure that only the most robust and reliable technologies are deployed. The operating environment will affect significantly the design and operation of any process, for example:

Variation in the electrostatic properties of regolith under different conditions (e.g. day and night);

Designing operations for lower gravity, different atmospheric characteristics, or no atmosphere at all;

Designing to withstand extremely high and low temperatures, and the process of cycling through them;

Material handling in dusty environments;

Local radiation environment; and,

Designing for reliability and durability.

Resource data are imperative for selecting appropriate technologies for SRU operations. These data must specify:

The location of the resource;

The resource properties (e.g. concentration, phase, associations);

The host material properties (e.g. regolith mineralogy, particle size distribution, particle shape, geotechnical properties);

The variability in the resource and host material properties (by region, by location and by environmental conditions); and,

The effect of the resource properties on utilisation (e.g. reactor efficiency, construction strength).

To bridge these gaps, high resolution orbital data sets must be captured and correlated to ground-truth exploration activities at select targets. As an illustration, of the proposals that have been developed previously for large-scale exploitation of resources, several have focused on the extraction of water ice at the lunar poles for propellant production (e.g., refs. 17 , 47 , 48 ). These detailed elaborations of production facilities on the Moon are based on assumptions about the form, quantity, variability, and behaviour of icy regolith. At present, there is no ground truth data to verify any of these assumptions, and there are major uncertainties associated with them 86 . Rigorous prospecting and ground truth exploration must be performed in order to raise the level of geological certainty 80 , 81 . This is standard practice on Earth for the economic development of mines, and will be equally relevant for SRU 80 , 81 .

The regolith samples returned by the Apollo and Luna missions of the 1960s and 1970s have incredible value for testing bench scale apparatuses, however the amount of lunar material made available for testing is insufficient to develop industrial-scale equipment. Furthermore, the successful development of terrestrial SRU demonstrators will be dependent on the availability of suitable simulants. However, the scientific community, along with private and public sector actors, must agree on a standardised approach for the characterisation of lunar regolith and lunar regolith simulants. Such a standard would enable honest, transparent, like-for-like comparisons of feedstocks and equipment performance, as well as provide justification for using certain simulants for any given technology demonstration.

Open science questions

There are many open science questions in space resource utilisation due to the novelty and relative immaturity. The following open questions are focused specifically on the applied science aspects needed upscale SRU to an economically viable, industrial scale. One of the benefits of this field is that, with careful design, data and samples required to design SRU processes can be used also to answer open questions of interest to the lunar science community.

Which resource characteristics are required to establish the viability of a resource? This encompasses characteristics of the specific resource such as concentration and occurrence, in addition to those of the host material. Regolith properties, such as size distribution, texture, cohesiveness, electrostatic charge and mineralogy, will be of interest 85 , 86 . The minimum amount of data to increase the geological certainty of a deposit and how it is collected should also be considered 77 , 78 , 80 , 81 . The use of such datasets in fundamental scientific studies (e.g. geology, planetary evolution) should be a key factor in extra-terrestrial mine planning.

How have geological and environmental processes affected properties of resources and how do these properties affect extraction processes? Environmental factors include geological processes (e.g. volcanism, crustal formation), impacts (delivery of resources versus loss of resources during impact reprocessing), solar wind and cosmic ray exposure, and magnetic anomalies. There are many fundamental science questions that can be addressed by understanding the geological and environmental processes occurring in the region of a given space resource, for example impact rate to create local regolith environment. For space resource applications, however, these processes will affect the composition and characteristics of the resource and the host material (e.g. burial depth, porosity, agglutinate content) 87 , 88 , 89 . Geotechnical properties, for example, are affected by the geological makeup (mineralogy, chemistry), impact and space exposure history of the lunar regolith 90 .

How do the local environmental conditions affect the resource and potential operations? For example, electrostatic charging of regolith, gravity, thermal conditions, atmospheric conditions, and radiation. Electrostatic charging of lunar regolith is known to present operational challenges, particularly with regards to reliability 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 . It is not possible to replicate simultaneously all aspects of the lunar environment on Earth, and while rapid developments are being made in the field of regolith simulants 95 , 96 , 97 , the production of agglutinates remains difficult at any scale 98 . Questions remain on the magnitude and distribution of electrostatic charging of regolith, and on how this can be mitigated. In situ studies are critical to enhance understanding. Another aspect of interest is the rate of change of environmental conditions (e.g. the atmosphere of Mars).

What is the variability of resources in a target region and the effect on processing and extracted product variability? Variability is an aspect of resource use that is critical in the long term. Variability in the resource and the host material affects every step of the process, from excavation through to purification of the final product 77 , 99 . Additionally, an understanding of the geological processes, as highlighted previously, will enable better prediction of the resource variability.

What are the physical and chemical processes that can be applied to extract and process local resources? Many processes have been proposed 83 , 84 , 85 , however not all are appropriate for all locations (e.g., hydrogen reduction in the lunar highlands 100 ). Strategies for establishing either the most suitable location or the most suitable process are required. Consideration also must be given to the effect of local conditions on process efficiency; this includes feedstock characteristics. End-to-end processing of the resource, including waste disposal/re-use and product storage are also required.

Outlook and summary

The confident design and successful operation of large- or industrial-scale SRU process operations requires detailed knowledge of the specific resource of interest and suitable extraction technologies. The priority for near-term demonstration missions and future exploration programmes must be to gather high-resolution, high-fidelity data about the performance characteristics of equipment, the local environmental conditions, and the availability of target resources. The terrestrial mining sector has immense expertise in resource exploration; combining this knowledge base with that of lunar/planetary scientists will enable the development of a realistic strategy, fulfilling both scientific goals and enabling SRU. Further, an extensive core and ancillary technology development programme, including optimisation and performance evaluation, is required. This will, in turn, improve the design and development of robust SRU technologies whilst contributing invaluable knowledge to the scientific community.

Orlova, A., Nogueira, R. & Chimenti, P. The present and future of the space sector: a business ecosystem approach. Space Policy 52 , 101374 (2020).

Article   Google Scholar  

Malyh, D., Vaulin, S., Fedorov, V., Peshkov, R. & Shalashov, M. A brief review on in-orbit refueling projects and critical techniques. Aerospace Syst . 5 , 185–196 (2022).

Bobskill, M. R. et al. Preparing for Mars: evolvable mars campaign “proving ground” approach. In 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference , 1–19 (IEEE, 2015).

Mueller, R. P., Sibille, L., Mantovani, J., Sanders, G. B. & Jones, C. A. Opportunities and strategies for testing and infusion of ISRU in the evolvable mars campaign. In AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition , 4459 (AIAA, 2015).

Keaton, P. W. A Moon base/Mars base transportation depot. In Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century (ed. Mendell, W. W.) 141–154 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1985).

Meurisse, A. & Carpenter, J. Past, present and future rationale for space resource utilisation. Planet. Space Sci. 182 , 104853 (2020).

Tsiolkovsky, K. The exploration of cosmic space by means of reaction motors. Sci. Rev. Mosc. St. Petersburg 221 , 222 (1903).

Google Scholar  

Mazanek, D. D., Merrill, R. G., Brophy, J. R. & Mueller, R. P. Asteroid redirect mission concept: a bold approach for utilizing space resources. Acta Astronaut. 117 , 163–171 (2015).

Clarke, A. C. Electromagnetic launching as a major contribution to space flight. J. Br. Interplanet. Soc. 9 , 261–267 (1950).

Carr, B. B. Recovery of water or oxygen by reduction of lunar rock. AIAA J. 1 , 921–924 (1963).

McKay, M., McKay, D. & Duke, M. Space resources: NASA SP-509 (NASA, 1992).

Drake, B. G., Hoffman, S. J. & Beaty, D. W. Human exploration of Mars, design reference architecture 5.0. In 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference , 1–24 (IEEE, 2010).

Sanders, G. B. & Larson, W. E. Progress made in lunar in-situ resource utilization under NASA’s Exploration Technology and Development Program. In Earth and Space (NASA, 2012).

Mueller, R. et al. Swamp works: a new approach to develop space mining and resource extraction technologies at the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In Future Mining Forum 2015 , KSC-E-DAA-TN26835 (NASA, 2015).

Dalton, C. & Hohmann, E. Conceptual design of a lunar colony (NASA, 1972).

Linne, D. L. et al. Lunar production system for extracting oxygen from regolith. J. Aerosp. Eng. 34 , 04021043 (2021).

Linne, D. L., Kleinhenz, J. E. & Paz, A. Lunar water pilot plant conceptual design. In ASCEND 2020 , 4236 (AIAA, 2020).

ESA. ESA Space Resources Strategy, https://tinyurl.com/yck54d6t (2019).

Hoffman, J. A. et al. Mars oxygen ISRU experiment (MOXIE)-Preparing for human Mars exploration. Sci. Adv. 8 , eabp8636 (2022).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Barber, S. et al. ProSPA: analysis of lunar polar volatiles and ISRU demonstration on the Moon. In 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2018).

Sanders, G., Kleinhenz, J. & Linne, D. NASA plans for in situ resource utilization (ISRU) development, demonstration, and implementation. In Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) 2022 (COSPAR, 2022).

NASA. NASA selects companies to collect lunar resources for Artemis, https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-selects-companies-to-collect-lunar-resources-for-artemis-demonstrations (2021).

ispace. ispace Announces Mission 1 Launch Date, https://ispace-inc.com/news-en/?p=3939 (2022).

Comstock, D. & Petro, A. Nasa’s centennial challenges contributions to ISRU. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition , 1205 (AIAA, 2009).

Sacksteder, K. & Sanders, G. In-situ resource utilization for lunar and mars exploration. In 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit , 345 (AIAA, 2007).

Agency, L. S. Space resources, https://space-agency.public.lu/en/space-resources.html (2022).

NASA. The Artemis Accords, https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/index.html (2022).

Government of the United States of America. United States Space Priorities Framework . Tech. Rep. (Government of the United States of America, Washington D.C., 2021). https://tinyurl.com/297a9r5j .

The Government of Luxembourg. Spaceresources.lu: New space law to provide framework for space resource utilisation, https://tinyurl.com/5n8y7b3w (2016).

Library of Congress. Japan: Space Resources Act Enacted, https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2021-09-15/japan-space-resources-act-enacted/ (2021).

The Government of the United Arab Emirates. UAE National Space Policy . Tech. Rep. (The Government of the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, 2021). https://tinyurl.com/y5pa3awy .

UNOOSA. Working group on legal aspects of space resource activities. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/copuos/lsc/space-resources/index.html (2021).

Association, M. V. Report of the Moon Village Association on the Global Expert Group on Sustainable Lunar Activities. In Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Legal Subcommittee, Sixtieth Session (United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, Vienna, 2021).

Gilber, A. Mining in space is coming (Milken Review, 2021). https://www.milkenreview.org/articles/mining-in-space-is-coming .

Jakhu, R. S., Pelton, J. N. & Nyampong, Y. O. M. Private sector space mining initiatives and policies in the United States. In Space Mining and Its Regulation (Springer, Cham 2017).

Bridenstine, J. Space resources are the key to safe and sustainable lunar exploration, https://blogs.nasa.gov/bridenstine/2020/09/10/space-resources-are-the-key-to-safe-and-sustainable-lunar-exploration/ (2020).

Kleinhenz, J. E. & Paz, A. An ISRU propellant production system for a fully fueled Mars Ascent Vehicle. In 10th Symposium on Space Resource Utilization , 0423 (AIAA, 2017).

Lee, K. A., Oryshchyn, L., Paz, A., Reddington, M. & Simon, T. M. The ROxygen project: Outpost-scale lunar oxygen production system development at johnson space center. J. Aerosp. Eng. 26 , 67–73 (2013).

Grill, L., Ostermeier, P., Würth, M. & Reiss, P. Behaviour of lunar regolith simulants in fluidised bed reactors for in-situ resource utilisation. Planet. Space Sci. 180 , 104757 (2020).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Schwandt, C., Hamilton, J. A., Fray, D. J. & Crawford, I. A. The production of oxygen and metal from lunar regolith. Planet. Space Sci. 74 , 49–56 (2012).

Lomax, B. A. et al. Proving the viability of an electrochemical process for the simultaneous extraction of oxygen and production of metal alloys from lunar regolith. Planet. Space Sci. 180 , 104748 (2020).

Allen, C. C., Morris, R. V. & McKay, D. S. Oxygen extraction from lunar soils and pyroclastic glass. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 101 , 26085–26095 (1996).

Sirk, A. H., Sadoway, D. R. & Sibille, L. Direct electrolysis of molten lunar regolith for the production of oxygen and metals on the moon. ECS Trans. 28 , 367 (2010).

Shaw, M. et al. Mineral processing and metal extraction on the lunar surface-challenges and opportunities. Miner. Process. Extractive Metall. Rev. 43 , 865–891 (2022).

Lu, Y. & Reddy, R. G. Extraction of metals and oxygen from lunar soil. High. Temp. Mater. Process. 27 , 223–234 (2008).

Gibson, M. A. & Knudsen, C. W. Apparatus for manufacture of oxygen from lunar ilmenite. US Patent 5,536,378 (1996).

Sowers, G. F. & Dreyer, C. B. Ice mining in lunar permanently shadowed regions. N. Space 7 , 235–244 (2019).

Kornuta, D. et al. Commercial lunar propellant architecture: a collaborative study of lunar propellant production. Reach 13 , 100026 (2019).

Blair, B. R. et al. Space resource economic analysis toolkit: the case for commercial lunar ice mining . Final report to the NASA Exploration Team (NASA, 2002).

Cannon, K. M. & Britt, D. T. A geologic model for lunar ice deposits at mining scales. Icarus 347 , 113778 (2020).

Brisset, J., Miletich, T. & Metzger, P. Thermal extraction of water ice from the lunar surface-A 3D numerical model. Planet. Space Sci. 193 , 105082 (2020).

Jedicke, R., Sercel, J., Gillis-Davis, J., Morenz, K. J. & Gertsch, L. Availability and delta-v requirements for delivering water extracted from near-Earth objects to cis-lunar space. Planet. Space Sci. 159 , 28–42 (2018).

Sonter, M. Near earth objects as resources for space industrialization. Sol. Syst. Dev. J. 1 , 1–31 (2001).

Zuppero, A. C. & Jacox, M. G. Near earth object fuels (neo-fuels): discovery, prospecting and use. In 43rd Congress of the International Astronautical Federation (IAF, 1992).

Sanchez, J.-P. & McInnes, C. Asteroid resource map for near-Earth space. J. Spacecr. Rockets 48 , 153–165 (2011).

Shoemaker, E. & Helin, E. Earth-approaching asteroids as targets for exploration (NASA, 1978).

Sonter, M. J. The technical and economic feasibility of mining the near-earth asteroids. Acta Astronaut. 41 , 637–647 (1997).

Gaffey, M. J. & Mccord, T. B. Asteroids: a source of natural resources for terrestrial and extra-terrestrial applications. In Abstracts of Papers Presented at a Special Session of the Seventh Annual Lunar Science Conference on Utilization of Lunar Materials and Expertise for Large Scale Operations in Space (Lunar Science Institute, 1976).

Jakus, A. E., Koube, K. D., Geisendorfer, N. R. & Shah, R. N. Robust and elastic lunar and martian structures from 3D-printed regolith inks. Sci. Rep. 7 , 1–8 (2017).

Goulas, A., Engstrøm, D. S. & Friel, R. J. Additive manufacturing using space resources. In Additive manufacturing , 661–683 (Elsevier, 2021).

Mueller, R. P. et al. Additive construction using basalt regolith fines. In Earth and Space 2014: Engineering for Extreme Environments (eds. Gertsch, L. S. & Malla, R. B.) 394–403 (ASCE, 2014).

Isachenkov, M., Chugunov, S., Akhatov, I. & Shishkovsky, I. Regolith-based additive manufacturing for sustainable development of lunar infrastructure–an overview. Acta Astronaut. 180 , 650–678 (2021).

Fateri, M. et al. Solar sintering for lunar additive manufacturing. J. Aerosp. Eng. 32 , 04019101 (2019).

Altun, A. A. et al. Additive manufacturing of lunar regolith structures. Open Ceram. 5 , 100058 (2021).

Reitz, B. et al. Additive manufacturing under lunar gravity and microgravity. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 33 , 1–12 (2021).

Labeaga-Martínez, N., Sanjurjo-Rivo, M., Díaz-Álvarez, J. & Martínez-Frías, J. Additive manufacturing for a Moon village. Procedia Manuf. 13 , 794–801 (2017).

Zocca, A. et al. Challenges in the technology development for additive manufacturing in space. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. Additive Manuf. Front . 1 , 100018 (2022).

Goulas, A., Harris, R. A. & Friel, R. J. Additive manufacturing of physical assets by using ceramic multicomponent extra-terrestrial materials. Addit. Manuf. 10 , 36–42 (2016).

Ulubeyli, S. Lunar shelter construction issues: the state-of-the-art towards 3D printing technologies. Acta Astronaut. 195 , 318–343 (2022).

Goulas, A., Binner, J. G., Harris, R. A. & Friel, R. J. Assessing extraterrestrial regolith material simulants for in-situ resource utilisation based 3D printing. Appl. Mater. Today 6 , 54–61 (2017).

Hogue, M. D., Mueller, R. P., Sibille, L., Hintze, P. E. & Rasky, D. J. Extraterrestrial regolith derived atmospheric entry heat shields. In Earth and Space 2016: Engineering for Extreme Environments (eds. Malla, R. B., Agui, J. H. & van Susante, P. J.) 699–712 (ASCE, 2016).

Hogue, M. D., Meuller, R. P., Sibille, L., Hintze, P. E. & Rasky, D. J. Regolith derived heat shield for planetary body entry and descent system with in situ fabrication . Tech. Rep., (NASA, 2012).

Horton, C. et al. First demonstration of photovoltaic diodes on lunar regolith-based substrate. Acta Astronaut. 56 , 537–545 (2005).

Waldron, R. Lunar manufacturing: a survey of products and processes. Acta Astronaut. 17 , 691–708 (1988).

Ellery, A. Generating and storing power on the moon using in situ resources. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 236 , 1045–1063 (2022).

Freundlich, A. et al. Manufacture of solar cells on the Moon. In Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005 ., 794–797 (IEEE, 2005).

Cilliers, J., Rasera, J. & Hadler, K. Estimating the scale of space resource utilisation (SRU) operations to satisfy lunar oxygen demand. Planet. Space Sci. 180 , 104749 (2020).

Hadler, K. et al. A universal framework for space resource utilisation (SRU). Planet. Space Sci . 182 , 104811 (2020).

Sour Gertsch, L. & Gertsch, R. E. Surface mine design and planning for lunar regolith production , vol. 654, 1108–1115 (American Institute of Physics, 2003).

Casanova, S. et al. Lunar polar water resource exploration–Examination of the lunar cold trap reservoir system model and introduction of play-based exploration (PBE) techniques. Planet. Space Sci. 180 , 104742 (2020).

Espejel, C. D. Lunar ore reserves standards 101 (LORS-101), a first code for the reporting of lunar exploration results, lunar resources, and lunar reserves. In Fourth International Future Mining Conference (AusIMM, 2019).

Luchsinger, K. M., Chanover, N. J. & Strycker, P. D. Water within a permanently shadowed lunar crater: Further LCROSS modeling and analysis. Icarus 354 , 114089 (2021).

Just, G., Smith, K., Joy, K. & Roy, M. Parametric review of existing regolith excavation techniques for lunar in situ resource utilisation (ISRU) and recommendations for future excavation experiments. Planet. Space Sci. 180 , 104746 (2020).

Taylor, L. A. & Carrier III, W. D. Production of oxygen on the Moon: which processes are best and why. AIAA J. 30 , 2858–2863 (1992).

Rasera, J., Cilliers, J., Lamamy, J. & Hadler, K. The beneficiation of lunar regolith for space resource utilisation: a review. Planet. Space Sci. 186 , 104879 (2020).

Taylor, G. J., Neubert, J., Lucey, P. & McCullough, E. The uncertain nature of polar lunar regolith. In Space Resources Roundtable VI , 45 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2004).

Taylor, S. R. Planetary science: a lunar perspective , vol. 3303 (Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, 1982).

Ohtake, M. et al. Geologic structure generated by large-impact basin formation observed at the south pole-aitken basin on the moon. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41 , 2738–2745 (2014).

Vaniman, D., Dietrich, J., Taylor, G. J. & Heiken, G. Exploration, samples, and recent concepts of the Moon , 5–26 (Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 1991).

Jayathilake, B., Ilankoon, I. & Dushyantha, M. Assessment of significant geotechnical parameters for lunar regolith excavations. Acta Astronaut. 196 , 107–122 (2022).

Kawamoto, H. & Miwa, T. Mitigation of lunar dust adhered to mechanical parts of equipment used for lunar exploration. J. Electrost. 69 , 365–369 (2011).

Carpenter, J. D., Fisackerly, R., De Rosa, D. & Houdou, B. Scientific preparations for lunar exploration with the european lunar lander. Planet. Space Sci. 74 , 208–223 (2012).

Christoffersen, R. & Lindsay, J. F. Lunar dust effects on spacesuit systems: insights from the apollo spacesuits . Tech. Rep. (NASA, 2009).

Afshar-Mohajer, N., Wu, C.-Y., Curtis, J. S. & Gaier, J. R. Review of dust transport and mitigation technologies in lunar and martian atmospheres. Adv. Space Res. 56 , 1222–1241 (2015).

Taylor, L. A., Pieters, C. M. & Britt, D. Evaluations of lunar regolith simulants. Planet. Space Sci. 126 , 1–7 (2016).

Liu, Y. & Taylor, L. A. Characterization of lunar dust and a synopsis of available lunar simulants. Planet. Space Sci. 59 , 1769–1783 (2011).

Toklu, Y. C. & Akpinar, P. Lunar soils, simulants and lunar construction materials: an overview. Adv. Space Res. 70 , 762–779 (2022).

Sun, H., Yi, M., Shen, Z., Zhang, X. & Ma, S. Developing a new controllable lunar dust simulant: Bhld20. Planet. Space Sci. 141 , 17–24 (2017).

Kosick, G., Bennett, C. & Dobby, G. Managing company risk by incorporating the mine resource model into design and optimization of mineral processing plants . Tech. Rep., (SGS Mineral Services, 2002).

Sargeant, H. M. et al. Hydrogen reduction of lunar samples in a static system for a water production demonstration on the moon. Planet. Space Sci. 205 , 105287 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the European Space Agency (ESA) for the opportunity to contribute to the SciSpacE White Paper exercise, as well as for supporting this submission to the special issue of npj Microgravity. We would also like to thank the ESA Topical Team on ‘A complete resource production flowsheet for lunar materials’, funded by ESA Contract 4000123986/18/NL/PG.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Jan Cilliers, Kathryn Hadler, Joshua Rasera.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

Jan Cilliers, Kathryn Hadler & Joshua Rasera

European Space Resources Innovation Centre (ESRIC), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Maison de l’Innovation, 5, avenue des Hauts-Fourneuax, Esch-sur-Alzette, L-4362, Luxembourg

Kathryn Hadler

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

J.J.C. and K.H. were responsible for developing the process background, the gap analysis, and identification of open questions, revising the paper, and general editing. J.N.R. was responsible for developing the introduction, the literature review, synthesis of literature and gaps/open questions, revising the paper structure, and general editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Cilliers .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Cilliers, J., Hadler, K. & Rasera, J. Toward the utilisation of resources in space: knowledge gaps, open questions, and priorities. npj Microgravity 9 , 22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-023-00274-3

Download citation

Received : 03 August 2022

Accepted : 13 March 2023

Published : 25 March 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-023-00274-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Cryogenic propellant management in space: open challenges and perspectives.

• Alessia Simonini
• Michael Dreyer
• Jean-Baptiste Gouriet

npj Microgravity (2024)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

• Utility Menu

Economics of Space

Space research at harvard business school, publications.

After decades of centralized control of economic activity in space, NASA and U.S. policymakers have begun to cede the direction of human activities in space to commercial companies. NASA garnered more than 0.7% of GDP in the mid-1960s but is only around 0.1% of GDP today. Meanwhile, space has become big business, with $300 billion in annual revenue.

The shift from public to private priorities in space is especially significant because a widely shared goal among commercial space's leaders is the achievement of a large-scale, mainly self-sufficient, developed space economy. Jeff Bezos has stated that the mission of his firm Blue Origin is "millions of people living and working in space." Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, has laid out plans to build a city of a million people on Mars within the next century. Both Neil deGrasse Tyson and Peter Diamandis have been given credit for stating that Earth's first trillionaire will be an asteroid miner. Such visions are clearly not going to become reality in the near future. But detailed roadmaps to them are being produced, and recent progress in the required technologies has been dramatic. If such space-economy visions are even partially realized, the implications for society will be enormous. Though economists should treat the prospect of a developed space economy with healthy skepticism, it would be irresponsible to treat it as science fiction.

In this article, I provide an analytical framework — based on classic economic analysis of the role of government in market economies — for understanding and managing the development of the space economy.

The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) achieved global acclaim by launching successful missions to the moon and Mars at a fraction of the cost of prior Western missions. It is now faced with an important strategic dilemma-whether to continue exploring deep space in collaboration with NASA and other leading agencies, whether to leverage its infrastructure for societal uses, or whether to exploit a commercial opportunity related to launching small, handheld cubesats.

The case explores the basis for ISRO's cost advantage vis-à-vis western entities, as well as its resource constraints and human capital considerations as it makes this important strategic choice for the future.

Planetary Resources, Inc. (PRI) had a bold, some said crazy, vision: to mine asteroids. One might have assumed that developing the right technology would be the greatest challenge facing PRI. But even if the fledgling company could develop and deploy the sophisticated imaging, prospecting, and communication capabilities required for mining asteroids, two additional obstacles meant success was not guaranteed. First, uncertainty remained over whether, and how, property rights to resources mined in space would be enforced.

PRI's leadership's challenge was to anticipate, and perhaps shape, how this uncertainty would be resolved. Making that balancing act more difficult was a second factor: a complex and underfunded U.S. regulatory infrastructure that threatened to slow PRI's progress and escalate costs.

Jeff Bezos, six years after starting a revolution in retailing with Amazon.com, turned his life-long passion for space into a start-up, Blue Origin. Blue (as it was called) was a part of the New Space industry, a collection of startup aerospace engineering companies that were intent on disrupting the American space sector with new technologies, management approaches, and competitive pressure. NASA hoped to leverage New Space to outsource its near-Earth activities and refocus its own efforts on deep space exploration. One of the agency's main mechanisms for this shift of activities was its Commercial Crew Development program (CCDev), a multi-phase initiative launched in 2009. Blue participated in the first two rounds of CCDev, and by all accounts these had been win-win experiences for it and NASA.

The decision point of the case is whether Blue should participate in the third, much larger, and more complex, stage of CCDev. The trade-off facing Blue's leaders was between the legitimacy, expertise, and funding provided by working with NASA and the autonomy, efficiency, and independence threatened by working with NASA. How would Blue, with its clear respect for NASA but its desire (and financial ability) to set its own priorities, make this decision?

An engineer and technology entrepreneur, Nobu Okada, had turned a mid-life crisis into a bold-some would say quixotic-quest to prevent a tragedy of the commons at the global scale. Namely, Okada believed the accumulation of debris in near-Earth orbital space posed a serious threat to a vast array of critical satellites and, thereby, both the modern information economy and the future of human activities in space. Frustrated at what he saw as far too slow a reaction to the threat among major space powers, Okada planned to develop a spacecraft capable of adhering to, and redirecting, that debris. By lowering the costs of debris removal, he hoped to make it routine, even in the absence of government action.

As of 2016 his company, Astroscale, which had secured private funding years earlier, was nearing the first demonstration of the technology. This case is intended to help students understand how a tragedy of the commons develops in a specific, nearly textbook example. As important, this case is about potential solutions to the tragedy of the commons when the market and policy both fall short.

Space Data Corp. plans to partner with the U.S. National Weather Service to place transceivers on weather balloons and thereby create a national mobile communications network. The company is in the late development stages and is planning to launch a regional test that will demonstrate its ability to provide paging and messaging. It intends to sell its service to existing mobile carriers, such as Skytel and Verizon, rather than directly to end users.

This case illustrates how Space Data has applied flexible business processes throughout its initial market research and technology development to create a system that can make optimal use of its limited resources and respond rapidly to changing conditions. As the case concludes, the executive team at Space Data faces three opportunities, each with very different costs and benefits for the company. It can proceed with a regional test of paging and messaging as planned, leap forward to develop a more complex but potentially more lucrative voice service (forgoing a regional test), or make a transition to the small but financially stable telemetry market.

Space Researchers

• Jeff Bussgang
• Alan D. MacCormack
• Karim R. Lakhani
• Matthew Weinzierl
• Prithwiraj (Raj) Choudhury
• Ramana Nanda
• Tarun Khanna
• Thomas R. Eisenmann

A Comprehensive Study on Space Debris, Threats Posed by Space Debris, and Removal Techniques

Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Science & Technologies For Engineering Systems (ICETSE-2019)

8 Pages Posted: 2 Jan 2020 Last revised: 23 Jul 2020

Sangita Mullick

S J C Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Students

Yashwanth Srinivasa

Ashutosh kumar sahu, jhanvi tharun sata.

Date Written: May 17, 2019

After exploring space for more than 50 years for research, study and defense purposes, the region above the atmosphere of earth is highly polluted by orbital debris. Figure 1 shows the total number of rocket launches in period of nine years. This has become a concern for placing satellites in their respective orbits and their safe functioning during their mission. Space debris or orbital debris colloquially known as space junk are parts of the non-functional satellites, thermal blankets, booster stages of the rockets. Those satellites are placed in the several orbits according to their missions. Mainly, they are placed in LEO (Low Earth Orbit), an earth centered orbit ranging from 200 to 2000 kilometers. Some are also placed in GEO (Geostationary Earth Orbit), at an altitude of 36000 kilometers and some are placed in the Higher Earth Orbit. Since the dawn of space age, approximately 7000 rockets have been launched, placing their payloads in several orbits of the Earth, revolving at several kilometers per second. And more than half of these objects are present in LEO. It is estimated that their sizes vary from a few millimeters to few meters, the largest being the European Envisat. Because of their high speeds, pieces of debris not more than a millimeter apart also poses a huge risk to current and upcoming space missions. Since the risk is increasing exponentially and is of great concern for all the space-faring nations, there is a need for the active removal of space debris. Hence, in this paper, the authors have analyzed the threat that space debris poses, and some of its removal techniques that have been proposed by scientists and space organizations. The authors have also suggested a few more of these Active Debris Removal techniques.

Keywords: Space Debris, Threats posed by Space Debris, and Removal Techniques

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Sangita Mullick (Contact Author)

S j c institute of technology, department of aeronautical engineering, students ( email ), do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on ssrn, paper statistics, related ejournals, industrial & manufacturing engineering ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Aerospace Engineering eJournal

Astronomy & astrophysics ejournal, materials performance ejournal, computational materials science ejournal.

The Space Policy Primer: Key Concepts, Issues and Actors

Download Paper

Key concepts and common nomenclature for thinking about space, an overview of international space law, and key questions confronting the United States and other countries today are discussed in this second edition of the space policy primer. It also provides a brief sketch of how the U.S. government is organized to address these difficult space policy questions and touches on the rationales for investing in space activities. While this primer by no means has touched on every important concept, rationale, actor, or issue, it hopefully makes a small contribution to the discussion on how the United States, and the world, moves ahead in space.

Authors: Mick Gleason, Robin Dickey, JP Byrne

Download this paper at: https://csps.aerospace.org/papers/space-policy-primer-key-concepts-issues-and-actors

Michael Gleason

• Falcon Heavy
• Human Spaceflight

ON-ORBIT RESEARCH

As the world's leading launch service provider, SpaceX enables researchers the opportunity to frequently fly critical science to orbit on the Dragon spacecraft, which has carried over 1,000 research experiments to and from low-Earth orbit and the International Space Station since 2012.

REDUCING IN-FLIGHT HEALTH RISKS

VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY

MEDICAL CARE AND TRAINING

DEVELOP YOUR RESEARCH

SpaceX is looking for exceptional science and research ideas that will enable life in space and on other planets. Research proposals submitted to SpaceX will be reviewed and evaluated based on mission objectives, scientific and technical merit, and feasibility.

CURRENT RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES

SpaceX is currently evaluating research proposals for Dragon human spaceflight missions on the following two categories:

FITNESS-FOCUSED RESEARCH

Exploration-focused research.

SpaceX © 2024 PRIVACY POLICY SUPPLIERS

100+ Space Research Topics [Updated]

Space has always attracted humanity’s imagination. The vastness of the cosmos, with its twinkling stars, mysterious planets, and enigmatic black holes, beckons us to explore its depths. But why do we study space? What are the research topics that drive scientists to reach for the stars? In this blog, we’ll delve into the fascinating world of space research topics, exploring key topics that continue to inspire and challenge researchers around the globe.

Why Do We Study Space?

Table of Contents

Here are some key points explaining why we study space:

• Understanding our Origins: Space research helps us uncover the origins of the universe, including how galaxies, stars, and planets formed.
• Advancing Scientific Knowledge: Studying space leads to breakthroughs in physics, astronomy, and other scientific fields, expanding our understanding of the cosmos.
• Technological Innovation: Space exploration drives the development of new technologies, such as satellite communication and medical imaging, benefiting society as a whole.
• Exploration and Discovery: Humans are inherently curious, and space offers a vast frontier for exploration, fueling our desire to discover new worlds and phenomena.
• Earth Observation: Space-based observations provide valuable data on Earth’s climate, weather patterns, and environmental changes, aiding in disaster management and conservation efforts.
• Search for Life: Investigating other planets and celestial bodies helps us understand the conditions necessary for life, potentially leading to the discovery of extraterrestrial life forms.
• Inspiration and Education: Space exploration inspires future generations of scientists, engineers, and explorers, fostering innovation and curiosity about the universe.

100+ Space Research Topics: Category Wise

Astronomy and astrophysics.

• Exoplanet detection methods and recent discoveries
• The life cycle of stars: from birth to death
• Supermassive black holes and their role in galaxy formation
• Gravitational waves: detection and implications
• Dark matter and dark energy: understanding the mysteries of the universe
• Supernovae explosions: studying the aftermath of stellar deaths
• Galactic dynamics: exploring the structure and evolution of galaxies
• Cosmic microwave background radiation: insights into the early universe
• Gamma-ray bursts: uncovering the most energetic explosions in the cosmos
• The search for extrasolar planets with potential habitable conditions

Planetary Science

• Martian geology and the search for signs of past life
• Jupiter’s Great Red Spot: dynamics and longevity
• Saturn’s rings: composition, structure, and origin
• Lunar exploration: past missions and future prospects
• Venusian atmosphere: understanding the greenhouse effect and extreme conditions
• Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto: Jupiter’s diverse moons
• Titan: Saturn’s moon with an Earth-like atmosphere and hydrocarbon lakes
• The Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud: reservoirs of comets and icy bodies
• Dwarf planets: Pluto, Eris, Haumea, Makemake, and Ceres
• Planetary volcanism: processes and consequences on various celestial bodies

Space Technology and Engineering

• Satellite constellations for global internet coverage
• CubeSats: miniaturized satellites for scientific research and technology demonstration
• Space debris mitigation strategies and technologies
• Ion propulsion systems: efficient propulsion for deep space missions
• Space telescopes: next-generation observatories for astronomy and astrophysics
• Space-based solar power: harvesting solar energy in orbit
• Asteroid mining: extracting resources from near-Earth objects
• In-situ resource utilization on other planets and moons
• Additive manufacturing (3D printing) in space exploration
• Autonomous spacecraft navigation and control for long-duration missions

Astrobiology and the Search for Life

• Extremophiles: organisms thriving in extreme environments on Earth and their implications for extraterrestrial life
• Biosignatures: markers of past or present life on other planets
• Methanogenesis on Mars: potential evidence for subsurface microbial life
• Europa’s subsurface ocean: exploring the possibility of life beneath the ice
• Enceladus: hydrothermal vents and the search for life in its subsurface ocean
• The habitability of exoplanets: assessing conditions for life beyond the solar system
• Panspermia: the transfer of life between celestial bodies
• Astrobiology field research in extreme environments on Earth
• SETI: the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and communication
• The implications of discovering microbial life on Mars or other celestial bodies

Space Policy and Ethics

• International collaboration in space exploration and research
• The Outer Space Treaty: principles governing the use of outer space
• Space tourism regulations and safety considerations
• Space law and jurisdiction: legal frameworks for activities in space
• Military applications of space technology and potential arms race in space
• Space resource utilization and ownership rights
• Space environmentalism: advocating for the protection of celestial bodies and their environments
• Space colonization ethics and implications for human societies
• Space governance beyond national boundaries
• Cultural heritage preservation on the Moon and other celestial bodies

Challenges and Future Directions

• Funding challenges and opportunities in space research and exploration
• Space radiation hazards and mitigation strategies for astronauts
• Interplanetary communication and navigation for deep space missions
• Long-duration spaceflight: physiological and psychological effects on astronauts
• Terraforming Mars: engineering a habitable environment on the Red Planet
• Space elevator concept: a revolutionary approach to space access
• Next-generation space launch vehicles and propulsion technologies
• Nuclear propulsion for crewed missions to Mars and beyond
• Space settlement design and infrastructure requirements
• Advancing artificial intelligence and robotics for autonomous space exploration

Space Weather and Space Environment

• Solar flares and coronal mass ejections: impacts on Earth’s magnetosphere and technology
• Space weather forecasting and its applications in satellite operations
• Magnetospheres of Earth and other planets: comparative studies and dynamics
• Solar wind interactions with planetary atmospheres and magnetospheres
• Aurora phenomena on Earth and other planets
• Radiation belts: understanding and mitigating hazards for spacecraft and astronauts
• Cosmic rays: sources, composition, and effects on space missions
• Space climate change: long-term variations in solar activity and their consequences
• Space weather effects on satellite communications, navigation, and power systems
• Space weather monitoring and prediction networks

Space Exploration and Missions

• Mars Sample Return mission: challenges and scientific objectives
• Artemis program: NASA’s plans for returning astronauts to the Moon
• Asteroid impact mitigation strategies and planetary defense initiatives
• The James Webb Space Telescope: capabilities and scientific goals
• Europa Clipper mission: exploring Jupiter’s icy moon for signs of habitability
• China’s Chang’e lunar exploration program: past achievements and future missions
• Commercial crew and cargo transportation to the International Space Station
• Voyager and Pioneer missions: the farthest human-made objects in space
• Space missions to study near-Earth objects and potential asteroid mining targets
• International Mars exploration collaborations and missions

Space Communication and Navigation

• Deep space communication networks and relay satellites
• Laser communication technology for high-speed data transmission in space
• Satellite-based navigation systems: GPS, Galileo, and GLONASS
• Interplanetary Internet: protocols and architectures for space communications
• Radio astronomy and interferometry: probing the universe with radio waves
• Quantum communication in space: secure and ultra-fast communication channels
• Delay-tolerant networking for deep space missions
• Autonomous navigation systems for spacecraft and rovers
• Optical communications for small satellites and CubeSats
• Space-to-ground communication systems for remote sensing and Earth observation satellites

Space Medicine and Human Spaceflight

• Microgravity effects on human physiology and health
• Countermeasures for mitigating bone and muscle loss in space
• Psychological challenges of long-duration space missions
• Space food technology: nutrition and sustainability in space
• Medical emergencies in space: protocols and procedures for astronaut health care
• Radiation shielding and protection for crewed missions beyond Earth orbit
• Sleep and circadian rhythms in space: optimizing astronaut performance
• Artificial gravity concepts for maintaining crew health on long-duration missions
• Telemedicine applications for space exploration missions
• Bioastronautics research: advancing human spaceflight capabilities and safety

Space Industry and Commercialization

• NewSpace companies: the rise of private space exploration ventures
• Satellite constellation deployments for global internet coverage
• Space tourism: opportunities, challenges, and market trends
• Commercial spaceports and launch facilities around the world
• Space manufacturing and in-space assembly techniques

Tips To Write Space Research Papers

Crafting space research papers can be a thrilling and fulfilling pursuit, yet it demands meticulous planning and implementation to guarantee that your efforts effectively convey your discoveries and make meaningful contributions to the discipline. Here are some tips to help you write space research papers:

• Choose a Narrow Topic: Space is a vast field with numerous sub-disciplines. Narrow down your topic to something specific and manageable, ensuring that it aligns with your interests and expertise.
• Conduct Thorough Research: Before you start writing, immerse yourself in the existing literature on your chosen topic. Familiarize yourself with key concepts, theories, and recent discoveries to provide context for your research.
• Develop a Clear Thesis Statement: Define the central argument or hypothesis of your paper in a concise and focused thesis statement. This statement should guide your writing and serve as the foundation for your research.
• Outline Your Paper: Create a detailed outline outlining the structure of your paper, including the introduction, literature review, results, and conclusion sections. This will help you organize your thoughts and ensure that your paper flows logically.
• Write a Compelling Introduction: Begin your paper with a captivating introduction that offers context about your subject, underscores its importance, and delineates the paper’s framework . Grab the reader’s interest and inspire them to delve further into your work.
• Provide a Comprehensive Literature Review: Synthesize the existing research on your topic in a literature review section. Examine pertinent research, theories, methodologies, and results, pinpointing any disparities or deficiencies in the existing literature that your study seeks to rectify.
• Detail Your Methodology: Describe the methods you used to conduct your research, including data collection, analysis, and interpretation techniques. Provide enough detail for readers to understand how your study was conducted and to evaluate its validity and reliability.
• Present Your Results Clearly: Present your research findings in a clear, concise manner, using tables, figures, and charts to illustrate key data points. Interpret your results objectively and discuss their implications in relation to your research question or hypothesis.
• Engage in Critical Analysis: Analyze your findings in the context of existing literature, discussing their significance, strengths, limitations, and potential implications for future research. Be critical and objective in your evaluation, acknowledging any potential biases or limitations in your study.
• Craft a Strong Conclusion: Summarize the main findings of your research and reiterate their significance in the conclusion section. Discuss any implications for theory, practice, or policy and suggest avenues for future research.
• Proofread and Revise: Before submitting your paper, carefully proofread it for spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Edit your writing to ensure clarity, coherence, and consistency, guaranteeing that your points are adequately backed and logically organized.
• Follow Formatting Guidelines: Follow the formatting instructions provided by the journal or conference to which you intend to submit your paper. Pay attention to details such as font size, margins, citation style, and reference formatting to ensure that your paper meets the publication requirements.

Space research offers a window into the vastness of the cosmos, revealing the beauty and complexity of the universe we inhabit. From the depths of space to the surfaces of distant planets, scientists are uncovering new wonders and answering age-old questions about our place in the universe. As we look to the stars, let us be inspired by the spirit of exploration and discovery that drives humanity ever onward, towards new horizons and unknown worlds. I hope you find the best space research topics from the above list.

Related Posts

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

MRGazer: decoding eye gaze points from functional magnetic resonance imaging in individual space

• Hu, Rongjie
• Wang, Yanming
• Qiu, Bensheng
• Wang, Xiaoxiao

Objective. Eye-tracking research has proven valuable in understanding numerous cognitive functions. Recently, Frey et al provided an exciting deep learning method for learning eye movements from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. It employed the multi-step co-registration of fMRI into the group template to obtain eyeball signal, and thus required additional templates and was time consuming. To resolve this issue, in this paper, we propose a framework named MRGazer for predicting eye gaze points from fMRI in individual space. Approach. The MRGazer consists of an eyeball extraction module and a residual network-based eye gaze prediction module. Compared to the previous method, the proposed framework skips the fMRI co-registration step, simplifies the processing protocol, and achieves end-to-end eye gaze regression. Main results. The proposed method achieved superior performance in eye fixation regression (Euclidean error, EE = 2.04°) than the co-registration-based method (EE = 2.89°), and delivered objective results within a shorter time (∼0.02 s volume ‑1 ) than prior method (∼0.3 s volume ‑1 ). Significance. The MRGazer is an efficient, simple, and accurate deep learning framework for predicting eye movement from fMRI data, and can be employed during fMRI scans in psychological and cognitive research. The code is available at https://github.com/ustc-bmec/MRGazer.

• eye tracking;
• fMRI analysis;
• deep convolutional neural networks;
• object detection;
• digital morphology operation;
• Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition;
• Quantitative Biology - Neurons and Cognition

• Search for: Toggle Search

AI Chases the Storm: New NVIDIA Research Boosts Weather Prediction, Climate Simulation

As hurricanes, tornadoes and other extreme weather events occur with increased frequency and severity, it’s more important than ever to improve and accelerate climate research and prediction using the latest technologies.

Amid peaks in the current Atlantic hurricane season, NVIDIA Research today announced a new generative AI model, dubbed StormCast, for emulating high-fidelity atmospheric dynamics. This means the model can enable reliable weather prediction at mesoscale — a scale larger than storms but smaller than cyclones — which is critical for disaster planning and mitigation.

Detailed in a paper written in collaboration with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of Washington, StormCast arrives as extreme weather phenomena are taking lives, destroying homes and causing more than $150 billion in damage annually in the U.S. alone.

It’s just one example of how generative AI is supercharging thundering breakthroughs in climate research and actionable extreme weather prediction, helping scientists tackle challenges of the highest stakes: saving lives and the world.

NVIDIA Earth-2 — a digital twin cloud platform that combines the power of AI, physical simulations and computer graphics — enables simulation and visualization of weather and climate predictions at a global scale with unprecedented accuracy and speed.

In Taiwan , for example, the National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction plans to predict fine-scale details of typhoons using CorrDiff , an NVIDIA generative AI model offered as part of Earth-2.

CorrDiff can super-resolve 25-kilometer-scale atmospheric data by 12.5x down to 2 kilometers — 1,000x faster and using 3,000x less energy for a single inference than traditional methods.

That means the center’s potentially lifesaving work, which previously cost nearly $3 million on CPUs, can be accomplished using about $60,000 on a single system with an NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU . It’s a massive reduction that shows how generative AI and accelerated computing increase energy efficiency and lower costs.

The center also plans to use CorrDiff to predict downwash — when strong winds funnel down to street level, damaging buildings and affecting pedestrians — in urban areas.

Now, StormCast adds hourly autoregressive prediction capabilities to CorrDiff, meaning it can predict future outcomes based on past ones.

A Global Impact From a Regional Focus

Global climate research begins at a regional level.

Physical hazards of weather and climate change can vary dramatically on regional scales. But reliable numerical weather prediction at this level comes with substantial computational costs. This is due to the high spatial resolution needed to represent the underlying fluid-dynamic motions at mesoscale.

Regional weather prediction models — often referred to as convection-allowing models, or CAMs — have traditionally forced researchers to face varying tradeoffs in resolution, ensemble size and affordability.

CAMs are useful to meteorologists for tracking the evolution and structure of storms, as well as for monitoring its convective mode, or how a storm is organized when it forms. For example, the likelihood of a tornado is based on a storm’s structure and convective mode.

CAMs also help researchers understand the implications for weather-related physical hazards at the infrastructure level.

For example, global climate model simulations can be used to inform CAMs, helping them translate slow changes in the moisture content of large atmospheric rivers into flash-flooding projections in vulnerable coastal areas.

At lower resolutions, machine learning models trained on global data have emerged as useful emulators of numerical weather prediction models that can be used to improve early-warning systems for severe events. These machine learning models typically have a spatial resolution of about 30 kilometers and a temporal resolution of six hours.

Now, with the help of generative diffusion, StormCast enables this at a 3-kilometer, hourly scale.

Despite being in its infancy, the model — when applied with precipitation radars — already offers forecasts with lead times of up to six hours that are up to 10% more accurate than the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s state-of-the-art 3-kilometer operational CAM.

Plus, outputs from StormCast exhibit physically realistic heat and moisture dynamics, and can predict over 100 variables, such as temperature, moisture concentration, wind and rainfall radar reflectivity values at multiple, finely spaced altitudes. This enables scientists to confirm the realistic 3D evolution of a storm’s buoyancy — a first-of-its-kind accomplishment in AI weather simulation.

NVIDIA researchers trained StormCast on approximately three-and-a-half years of NOAA climate data from the central U.S., using NVIDIA accelerated computing to speed calculations.

More Innovations Brewing

Scientists are already looking to harness the model’s benefits.

“Given both the outsized impacts of organized thunderstorms and winter precipitation, and the major challenges in forecasting them with confidence, the production of computationally tractable storm-scale ensemble weather forecasts represents one of the grand challenges of numerical weather prediction,” said Tom Hamill, head of innovation at The Weather Company. “StormCast is a notable model that addresses these challenges, and The Weather Company is excited to collaborate with NVIDIA on developing, evaluating and potentially using these deep learning forecast models.”

“Developing high-resolution weather models requires AI algorithms to resolve convection, which is a huge challenge,” said Imme Ebert-Uphoff, machine learning lead at Colorado State University’s Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere. “The new NVIDIA research explores the potential of accomplishing this with diffusion models like StormCast, which presents a significant step toward the development of future AI models for high-resolution weather prediction.”

Alongside the acceleration and visualization of physically accurate climate simulations, as well as a digital twin of our planet , such research breakthroughs signify how NVIDIA Earth-2 is enabling a new, vital era of climate research.

Learn more about sustainable computing and NVIDIA Research, a global team of hundreds of scientists and engineers focused on topics including climate AI, computer graphics, computer vision, self-driving cars and robotics.

Featured image courtesy of NASA.

See notice regarding software product information.

Share on Mastodon

Style and Grammar Guidelines

APA Style provides a foundation for effective scholarly communication because it helps writers present their ideas in a clear, concise, and inclusive manner. When style works best, ideas flow logically, sources are credited appropriately, and papers are organized predictably. People are described using language that affirms their worth and dignity. Authors plan for ethical compliance and report critical details of their research protocol to allow readers to evaluate findings and other researchers to potentially replicate the studies. Tables and figures present information in an engaging, readable manner.

The style and grammar guidelines pages present information about APA Style as described in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Seventh Edition and the Concise Guide to APA Style, Seventh Edition . Any updates to APA Style are noted on the applicable topic pages. If you are still using the sixth edition, helpful resources are available in the sixth edition archive .

Looking for more style?

• Accessibility of APA Style
• Line Spacing
• Order of Pages
• Page Header
• Paragraph Alignment and Indentation
• Sample Papers
• Title Page Setup
• Appropriate Level of Citation
• Basic Principles of Citation
• Classroom or Intranet Sources
• Paraphrasing
• Personal Communications
• Quotations From Research Participants
• Secondary Sources
• Abbreviations
• Capitalization
• Italics and Quotation Marks
• Punctuation
• Spelling and Hyphenation
• General Principles for Reducing Bias
• Historical Context
• Intersectionality
• Participation in Research
• Racial and Ethnic Identity
• Sexual Orientation
• Socioeconomic Status
• Accessible Use of Color in Figures
• Figure Setup
• Sample Figures
• Sample Tables
• Table Setup
• Archival Documents and Collections
• Basic Principles of Reference List Entries
• Database Information in References
• DOIs and URLs
• Elements of Reference List Entries
• Missing Reference Information
• Reference Examples
• References in a Meta-Analysis
• Reference Lists Versus Bibliographies
• Works Included in a Reference List
• Active and Passive Voice
• Anthropomorphism
• First-Person Pronouns
• Logical Comparisons
• Plural Nouns
• Possessive Adjectives
• Possessive Nouns
• Singular “They”
• Adapting a Dissertation or Thesis Into a Journal Article
• Correction Notices
• Cover Letters
• Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS)
• Open Science
• Response to Reviewers