easy essay on smart city

Essay Curve

Essay on Smart City – Examples, 10 Lines to 1200 Words

Essay on Smart City: In today’s rapidly evolving world, the concept of smart cities has gained significant attention as a solution to urban challenges. Smart cities leverage technology and data to improve the quality of life for residents, enhance sustainability, and drive economic growth. This essay will explore the key components of a smart city, the benefits they offer, and the challenges they face. By understanding the potential of smart cities, we can pave the way for a more efficient and connected urban future.

Table of Contents

Smart City Essay Writing Tips

1. Start by defining what a smart city is and why it is important in today’s world. A smart city is a city that uses technology and data to improve the quality of life for its residents, enhance sustainability, and increase efficiency in various aspects of urban living.

2. Discuss the key components of a smart city, such as smart infrastructure, smart transportation, smart energy management, and smart governance. Each of these components plays a crucial role in making a city smarter and more efficient.

3. Highlight the benefits of smart cities, including improved public services, reduced traffic congestion, lower energy consumption, and enhanced safety and security. These benefits not only improve the quality of life for residents but also attract businesses and investment to the city.

4. Provide examples of successful smart city initiatives from around the world. For instance, Singapore is known for its smart transportation system, Barcelona for its smart waste management, and Amsterdam for its smart energy grid. These examples can serve as inspiration for other cities looking to become smarter.

5. Address the challenges and potential drawbacks of implementing smart city technologies, such as data privacy concerns, cybersecurity risks, and the digital divide. It is important to acknowledge these challenges and discuss how they can be mitigated to ensure the successful implementation of smart city initiatives.

6. Discuss the role of collaboration and partnerships in building a smart city. It is essential for governments, businesses, and residents to work together to develop and implement smart city solutions that benefit everyone in the community.

7. Conclude the essay by emphasizing the importance of embracing smart city technologies to create more sustainable, efficient, and livable urban environments. By investing in smart city initiatives, cities can improve the quality of life for their residents and create a more prosperous and resilient future.

In conclusion, writing an essay on smart cities requires a thorough understanding of the concept, its components, benefits, challenges, and potential solutions. By following these writing tips and incorporating relevant examples and data, you can create a compelling and informative essay on the topic of smart cities.

Essay on Smart City in 10 Lines – Examples

1. A smart city is a city that uses technology and data to improve the quality of life for its residents. 2. Smart cities use sensors, cameras, and other devices to collect data on things like traffic flow, air quality, and energy usage. 3. This data is then analyzed to help city officials make better decisions about how to manage resources and provide services. 4. Smart cities often use technology to improve transportation systems, making it easier for residents to get around. 5. They also use technology to enhance public safety, with features like smart streetlights and surveillance cameras. 6. Smart cities prioritize sustainability, using technology to reduce energy consumption and waste. 7. They also focus on improving communication between residents and city officials, often through apps and online platforms. 8. Smart cities are constantly evolving, with new technologies being implemented to address the changing needs of residents. 9. While smart cities offer many benefits, there are also concerns about privacy and data security that need to be addressed. 10. Overall, smart cities are seen as a way to create more efficient, sustainable, and livable urban environments for the future.

Sample Essay on Smart City in 100-180 Words

A smart city is a city that uses technology and data to improve the quality of life for its residents. This includes using sensors to monitor traffic flow, air quality, and energy usage, as well as implementing smart infrastructure like energy-efficient buildings and smart transportation systems. By collecting and analyzing data, smart cities can make informed decisions to improve efficiency, reduce pollution, and enhance public services.

One of the key benefits of a smart city is increased sustainability. By using technology to optimize resource usage and reduce waste, smart cities can lower their environmental impact and create a more sustainable future. Additionally, smart cities can improve public safety by using data to predict and prevent crime, as well as enhance emergency response times.

Overall, smart cities have the potential to revolutionize urban living by creating more efficient, sustainable, and livable communities for residents.

Short Essay on Smart City in 200-500 Words

A smart city is a concept that has gained popularity in recent years as technology continues to advance and urban populations grow. A smart city is defined as a city that uses technology and data to improve the quality of life for its residents, enhance sustainability, and increase efficiency in various aspects of city life.

One of the key components of a smart city is the use of technology to improve infrastructure and services. This can include the use of sensors and data analytics to monitor traffic flow, manage energy usage, and optimize waste management. By using technology in this way, cities can reduce congestion, lower energy consumption, and improve overall quality of life for residents.

Another important aspect of a smart city is the focus on sustainability and environmental conservation. Smart cities often prioritize green initiatives such as renewable energy sources, efficient public transportation systems, and green spaces. By implementing these initiatives, cities can reduce their carbon footprint, improve air quality, and create a more sustainable environment for residents.

In addition to infrastructure and sustainability, smart cities also focus on improving the quality of life for residents through technology. This can include the use of smart devices and applications to provide residents with real-time information on public transportation, weather conditions, and local events. By providing residents with access to this information, cities can improve communication, increase convenience, and enhance overall quality of life.

Overall, the concept of a smart city is an exciting and innovative approach to urban development. By using technology and data to improve infrastructure, sustainability, and quality of life, cities can create more efficient, sustainable, and livable environments for their residents. As technology continues to advance, the possibilities for smart cities are endless, and the potential for positive impact on urban populations is significant.

Essay on Smart City in 1000-1500 Words

A smart city is a concept that has gained popularity in recent years as technology continues to advance and urban populations continue to grow. The term “smart city” refers to a city that uses technology and data to improve the quality of life for its residents, enhance sustainability, and create economic opportunities. In this essay, we will explore the concept of a smart city, its benefits, challenges, and potential future developments.

One of the key features of a smart city is the use of technology to improve the efficiency of city services and infrastructure. For example, smart cities may use sensors and data analytics to monitor traffic flow, optimize public transportation routes, and manage energy consumption. By using technology in this way, smart cities can reduce congestion, lower energy costs, and improve overall quality of life for residents.

Another important aspect of a smart city is its focus on sustainability. Smart cities often prioritize environmentally friendly practices, such as using renewable energy sources, promoting public transportation, and implementing green building standards. By incorporating sustainability into their planning and development, smart cities can reduce their carbon footprint, conserve resources, and create a healthier environment for residents.

In addition to improving efficiency and sustainability, smart cities also aim to create economic opportunities for residents. By investing in technology and innovation, smart cities can attract businesses, create jobs, and stimulate economic growth. For example, smart cities may offer incentives for tech companies to set up offices or provide funding for startups to develop new technologies. By fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship, smart cities can become hubs of economic activity and prosperity.

Despite the many benefits of smart cities, there are also challenges that must be overcome in order to fully realize their potential. One of the biggest challenges is the cost of implementing new technologies and infrastructure. Building a smart city requires significant investment in sensors, data analytics, and communication networks, which can be expensive for cash-strapped municipalities. In addition, there may be resistance from residents who are concerned about privacy and data security issues.

Another challenge is the need for collaboration and coordination among different stakeholders. Building a smart city requires cooperation between government agencies, private companies, and community organizations, all of which may have different priorities and agendas. In order to be successful, smart cities must find ways to bring these stakeholders together and align their interests towards a common goal.

Despite these challenges, the concept of a smart city continues to gain momentum as more cities around the world embrace technology and innovation. In the future, we can expect to see even more advanced smart cities that use artificial intelligence, blockchain, and other cutting-edge technologies to improve efficiency, sustainability, and quality of life for residents.

In conclusion, smart cities are a promising concept that has the potential to transform urban living for the better. By using technology and data to improve efficiency, sustainability, and economic opportunities, smart cities can create a more livable and prosperous environment for residents. While there are challenges that must be overcome, the benefits of smart cities are clear, and the future looks bright for this innovative approach to urban development.

Related Essays

Essay on A Visit To A Fair – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Value of Games And Sports – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Essay on Importance of Teacher – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words

Essay on A Visit To A Museum – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words

Essay on Effect of Social Media On Youth

Essay on Shri Guru Nanak Dev Ji – Short & Long Essay Examples

Essay on Nuclear Family – Short Essay & Long Essay upto 1500 Words

Essay on Anudeep Durishetty – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Essay on Non Violence – Samples, 10 Lines to 1500 Words

Covid 19 Responsive School – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Speech on Smart City

Imagine a city where everything is connected and automated. This is a Smart City, a place where technology and data come together to improve your life.

Living in a Smart City, you can enjoy smoother transportation, better public services, and a cleaner environment. It’s a city that’s future-ready, designed for your convenience.

1-minute Speech on Smart City

Good day, everyone! Let’s talk about a super cool idea – Smart Cities! You know how in cartoons, cities talk and help people? Well, Smart Cities are kind of like that. They use technology to make life easier.

Now think of a city where streetlights know when to switch on and off. They use sensors to understand when it’s dark and switch on automatically. And when morning comes, they switch off. This saves a lot of energy, and we all know how important saving energy is.

Can you picture a city where trash cans tell the city workers when they’re full? No more overflowing trash, no more smelly streets. In a Smart City, sensors in trash cans let city workers know when to collect the trash.

Imagine a city where parks are watered only when needed. The sprinklers understand when the ground is dry and water the plants. This saves water, and that’s good for the planet.

Lastly, think of how safe a Smart City is. With cameras and sensors, the city can spot problems and solve them quickly. If a fire starts, the city knows right away and sends help.

So, you see, Smart Cities are not just cool, they’re necessary. They make life easier, save energy, water, and keep us safe. We need to work towards building these Smart Cities for a better future!

Also check:

2-minute Speech on Smart City

Imagine a city where life is easy, where everything works smoothly, like a well-oiled machine. A city that thinks and acts on its own, making life better for all its residents. This is the vision of a Smart City. A Smart City doesn’t just mean more technology or shiny new buildings. It means a city that uses technology to improve life for everyone.

First, let’s talk about how a Smart City can make life easier. Imagine you’re in a hurry to go to work. But you don’t need to worry about traffic because your car already knows the quickest route. It has data from traffic sensors all over the city. Or picture this: you’re at home and need to get groceries. But you don’t need to go to the store because a drone can deliver it to your home. That’s what life in a Smart City can be like.

Next, let’s look at how a Smart City can keep us safe. Imagine a city where street lights turn on when they sense people walking by. Or where cameras can spot an accident right away and send help. A Smart City can use technology to keep us safe and sound.

Now, think about how a Smart City can help us live healthier lives. Sensors can monitor air quality and warn us when pollution levels are high. Apps on our phones can remind us to exercise or drink water. Living in a Smart City can be like having a personal health coach.

But it’s not just about making life easier, safer, or healthier. A Smart City can help us connect with each other too. Public spaces could have free Wi-Fi so everyone can access the internet. Digital boards could show community news or events. In a Smart City, technology can bring us closer together.

In conclusion, a Smart City is not a far-off dream. It’s a reality we can build together. It’s a city that uses technology to make life better for everyone. It’s a city that’s easy to live in, keeps us safe, helps us stay healthy, connects us, and cares for our planet. Let’s bring the vision of a Smart City to life. Thank you.

We also have speeches on more interesting topics that you may want to explore.

Smart Cities

Smart cities promise that with increasing connectedness, city services and quality of life can be improved.

Anthropology, Sociology, Engineering, Social Studies, Civics

Microgrid Gas Meter

Smart meters, like this smart natural gas meter, wirelessly send power usage rates to help cut down wasted energy use.

Photograph by Gado Reportage

Since humans began living in cities more than 6,000 years ago, they’ve had to address the same problems: sanitation, crime, congestion, tax collection, maintenance of public facilities, and emergency services. In addition, important technological innovations require infrastructure : the electric grid; telephone and cell-phone networks; internet (including fiber optic and cable networks); hot and cold running water; water and waste treatment; garbage and recycling removal; public parks and recreation facilities; rail, light rail, and automotive streets, roads, thoroughfares, and rights-of-way. Today, cities are getting “smarter” to provide for improved delivery and quality of services through continuous monitoring of residents and infrastructure , and relatively instantaneous communication of suboptimal performance. To a large extent, this requires heavy reliance on automation, connectivity to the internet, and what is referred to as the “ Internet of Things (IoT).” ( Internet of Things refers to connecting devices to the internet that can be control led or can be used to send control information). A smart city , then, is a city in which a suite of sensors (typically hundreds or thousands) is deployed to collect electronic data from and about people and infrastructure so as to improve efficiency and quality of life. Residents and city workers, in turn, may be provided with apps that allow them to access city services, receive and issue reports of outages, accidents, and crimes, pay taxes, fees, and the like. In the smart city , energy efficiency and sustainability are emphasized. Smart Transportation A variety of “smart transportation” systems can be implemented in a smart city . For example, smart cities may implement a smart traffic flow management system, which can combine a central control system with controls for traffic lights and sensors for detecting delays or the amount of traffic at particular intersections. The control system can adjust the timing of the lights based on the amount of traffic and how well that traffic is flowing. Some systems can adjust timing, for example, for buses or emergency vehicles as well. Further, some systems may monitor conditions (or receive reports of conditions) on main highways and major roads and adjust timing on major roads and alternate routes to compensate. Smart toll roads may also be provisioned. For example, sensors may be instal led that detect when a car passes a toll plaza and deduct the toll from a user account. In addition, a variable toll may be assessed based on traffic conditions. For example, express toll lanes may be implemented that monitor traffic and charge a greater amount based on the amount of usage of the lane. In addition, cities, or parts of cities, may be provided with a smart parking-meter network. Parking meters may, for example, be equipped with sensors or other monitors that communicate with a central server and a user app to advise when a parking spot is available and guide a driver to it. Such meters may be able to automatically charge a parker for using the spot and advise the user and, potentially, law enforcement when the meter time has expired. A more complicated new technology being proposed for smart cities is autonomous (driverless) vehicles. In addition to user-owned and operated vehicles, use of electric, autonomous vehicles in a ride-share system has been proposed. Such autonomous vehicles could communicate with one another to execute maneuvers (such as lane changes, etc.) more rapidly and in a smaller space. In particular, vehicles could be “platooned,” i.e., driven much closer together in coordination than is possible (or desirable) with human drivers. In proposals in which the vehicles are electric vehicles, wireless charging stations could be provided on roadways. When a vehicle stops at a stoplight, for example, it could pick up a bit of a charge. Smart Energy The goal of any electric grid is to provide enough power when needed (with efficiency) and minimize downtime and damage when faults occur. One method for dealing with this is through the use of smart meters, which are digital. Electric meters can be used to replace the old, mechanical meters that require personnel to “read” the meter once a month. They can provide more timely monitoring of a particular customer’s usage and communicate wirelessly, so that no one needs to enter a backyard. Smart meters may also allow the utility to identify a source of a power outage more rapidly. In addition, control of the house’s electricity can be handled easily from a centralized location, without requiring a utility crew to go out to turn it on or off. Smart meters can also allow for differential rate provisioning. That is, a consumer can be charged more for higher usage during peak hours (and because the user has more timely access to his or her electric use, may be able to adjust that use accordingly). In addition, some utilities have proposed the use of microgrids. These are groups of interconnected loads and sources that typically connect to the wider grid but can also be disconnected to operate autonomously as an “island.” Such microgrids can function as backups if there is a failure in the larger grid, but also can operate more efficiently. Even such mundane features of urban life as streetlights may come to be networked as part of the smart city. Some cities, for example, are replacing old streetlights with those using more efficient light-emitting diodes, or LEDs. These new streetlights can also support cameras and other sensors for monitoring crowds or high-traffic areas. Sensors can even be installed to monitor pollutants.

Privacy Concerns With the proliferation of sensors and data monitoring over many aspects of people’s lives, smart cities have raised concerns over privacy and data security. In this regard, the highest security possible should be expected, though it should be noted that anything connected to the internet is susceptible to being hacked.

Media Credits

The audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.

Production Managers

Program specialists, last updated.

October 19, 2023

User Permissions

For information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher. They will best know the preferred format. When you reach out to them, you will need the page title, URL, and the date you accessed the resource.

If a media asset is downloadable, a download button appears in the corner of the media viewer. If no button appears, you cannot download or save the media.

Text on this page is printable and can be used according to our Terms of Service .

Interactives

Any interactives on this page can only be played while you are visiting our website. You cannot download interactives.

Related Resources

Book Reviews

Book review forums.

Refusing Police Power: Resistances and Ambivalences to State Violence

Book Review Forum

Carbon sovereignty by andrew curley.

On Containers and Conjunctures at People’s Park

Violent Inheritance Book Review

Phenom Penh's Bassac District: Genealogy of Bassac Review

Liberation, Solidarity, Abundance: Envisioning Hawaiʻi Beyond the GMO Present

Announcements.

Society and Space statement and virtual issue on Palestine and Israel

Free to Access Society and Space Journal Articles

Pressing pause in a time of crisis, editorial statement from our new review and open site editors, society and space editorial team changes, most read pieces from 2018, current issue, past issues.

A curation of articles, essays, book reviews and interviews on critical geographical concerns.

Current Issue

Past issues, information, privacy policy, terms & conditions, jennifer gabrys, published on, feb 11, 2014, urban and urbanization, smart cities as sustainable cities: a visual essay.

A frequently referenced forerunner of the smart city is this proposal by the British architectural collective, Archigram, for a “Plug-In City,” which supplanted fixed buildings with a moveable network of spaces and interchangeable “programs” for urban inhabitations.

February 11, 2014

Print this essay, latest from the magazine, latest journal issue, volume 41 issue 4.

Figure 1. “Plug-in city,” Archigram, 1964

Multiple information and digital cities emerged throughout the dot-com era. This example of the Cité Multimédia in Montreal documents the enfolding of imaginings of urban space with the capacities of computational rendering, which further inform actual development schemes.

The diagrammatic quality of informational cities designs can be found in newer proposals for smart cities, including this sensor world by Libelium , an “internet of things provider” based in Spain. In this proposal, numerous urban services and operations, from lighting to shopping, become augmented and newly articulated through wireless sensor networks.

The technology that is promoted as reconfiguring urban landscapes is computational sensors, relatively miniature devices connected to computational infrastructures of multiple different scales and generating an expanded array of command-and-control programs for making urban space more efficient.

“The city of 2020,” Tomorrow’s Cities, BBC

As part of the imagining and promoting of smart cities, numerous schematic designs have emerged that capture an apparently symbiotic fusing of technology and nature. This special focus on “Tomorrow’s Cities,” gathered together by the BBC , envisions “farmscrapers” and efficient infrastructures combining into a bucolic scene with delivery drones and sensor networks.

“A blueprint for city transformation,” Connected Urban Development

The Connected Urban Development (CUD) initiative, formed through a partnership between Cisco and the Clinton Initiative, with MIT and the Connected Sustainable Cities project (CSC) joining the project as it progressed, is a clear example of smart cities developing into sustainable city initiatives, where sustainability–typically in the form of efficiency–becomes a guiding logic for reworking any number of urban services and operations.[vc_video title="#" link="http://vimeo.com/6145800"]

The perceived importance of reworking smart cities as sustainable cities is frequently narrated through the increasing numbers of people now living in cities, which have become dominant sites of resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. This particular CUD video provides example scenarios for how smart city initiatives will realize more optimal urban functioning. Efficiency emerges here within a (gendered) logic of gamification, behavioral responsiveness and optimization.

Madrid scenario, Connected Sustainable Cities, Mitchell and Casalegno (2008)

As discussed in the “ Programming Environments ” article, the scenarios developed by William Mitchell and Federico Casalegno as part of their Connected Sustainable Cities visioning document illustrate in graphic-novel style the ways in which everyday actions such as commuting, cooking and heating one’s home may be synchronized through ubiquitous computing to enable more efficient use of resources.

Eco-love contest, Connected Sustainable Cities, Mitchell and Casalegno (2008)

Beyond the use of resources, smart cities might also provide new ways of understanding relationality. Here, an eco-love contest becomes the site where an increasingly competitive approach to environmental monitoring is meant to ensure optimal mating opportunities.

Curitiba scenario, Connected Sustainable Cities, Mitchell and Casalegno (2008)

Urban sensor landscapes are presented in this scenario as not just enabling more efficient transit options, but also as facilitating political participation here through making air pollution data more apparent. However, the steps from data to action remain an elusive proposition, and the more contested and conflicted practices of citizenship that might actually contribute to political change are absent in these data-to-action scenarios.

They Eat Our Sweat Review

Daniel Agbiboa's 'They Eat Our Sweat' is a vivid ethnographic portrait of informal transport in Lagos, providing us with a vantage point to understand the experiences of corruption and informality in everyday urban life.

Planning for Humane Urbanism Through Solidarity and Radical Care

Miraftab invites planning scholars to rethink the field’s futures, rejecting the currently dominant bully urbanism centered on profit, for a humane urbanism centered on life.

Faranak Miraftab

Review, Citizen Designs, by Eli Elinoff

Citizen Designs is a careful depiction of what democracy feels like, with all its discomforts, disagreements, and unresolved tensions. Elinoff manages to present a picture of the struggle for equal citizenship that is at once optimistic and unromantic. In this, the book makes a timely and important contribution to understandings of the relationship between politics and design

Hayden Shelby

Lebanese Yawmiyat (diaries): Archiving unfinished stories of spatial violence

The essay captures some aspects of urban violence in Lebanon and constructs their spatialities. Stories of struggle and creative coping strategies amidst the multiple crises in Lebanon constitute ‘living archives’. They expand the meaning and imaginaries of everyday life, link between a shared past and present reality, and transform the urban space.

Hanadi Samhan, Dina Mneimneh, Hoda Mekkaoui and Camillo Boano

Planning context: Flexible plans and mayoral authority in French urban planning

In this article, I consider the relationship between urban planning and context by investigating the planning practices associated with a land-use plan in Bordeaux described as “adapted to context.”

Jenny Lindblad

Counterfactual future-thinking

Homing in on the protracted landscape of construction, I am concerned with how urban experts in Taksim 360, who do not entirely concur with the seemingly determined trajectory of urban transformation in Tarlabaşı, put inevitability to work. I ask: what makes urban experts stay with a project that might not materialize?

Alize Arıcan

Book Review Forums

Back to web version.

cholars and practitioners of urban planning need to rethink the field’s futures at this important historical juncture: some might call it a moment of truth when there is little left to hide. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed many cracks, contradictions, and inequalities that have always existed but are now more visible. This also includes the global vaccine apartheid that is ongoing as I write these words. Moreover, this is a time when the violence through which U.S. imperialism has exercised power worldwide is increasingly exposed. Protests in the summer of 2020, which spread all over the United States like fire through a long-dried haystack, showed Americans and the whole world that racialized violence and police brutality are real. They also revealed that such brutality is spatially facilitated in American apartheid—a condition that planning has been far from innocent in creating and maintaining. I think this reckoning is particularly important in the United States, the belly of the beast, where there might have been more of an illusion about planning innocence.

What’s a Rich Text element?

Moreover, this is a time when the violence through which U.S. imperialism has exercised power worldwide is increasingly exposed. Protests in the summer of 2020, which spread all over the United States like fire through a long-dried haystack, showed Americans and the whole world that racialized violence and police brutality are real. They also revealed that such brutality is spatially facilitated in American apartheid—a condition that planning has been far from innocent in creating and maintaining. I think this reckoning is particularly important in the United States, the belly of the beast, where there might have been more of an illusion about planning innocence.

Moreover, this is a time when the violence through which U.S. imperialism has exercised power worldwide is increasingly exposed.
Protests in the summer of 2020, which spread all over the United States like fire through a long-dried haystack, showed Americans and the whole world that racialized violence and police brutality are real.
They also revealed that such brutality is spatially facilitated in American apartheid—a condition that planning has been far from innocent in creating and maintaining.
I think this reckoning is particularly important in the United States, the belly of the beast, where there might have been more of an illusion about planning innocence.
They also revealed that such brutality is spatially facilitated in American apartheid—a condition that planning has been far from innocent in creating and maintaining. I think this reckoning is particularly important in the United States, the belly of the beast, where there might have been more of an illusion about planning innocence.

Static and dynamic content editing

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

How to customize formatting for each rich text

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.

NCERT Books

Essay on Smart City in India | Smart City in India Essay for Students and Children in English

Essay on Smart City in India: The movement of Smart City in India was introduced by our Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has a plan and a vision to build 100 smart cities in the country. Smart Cities are similar to ordinary cities but equipped with more advanced technologies and more transportation facilities along with a high rate of educated population with better sanitation and health facilities. In this essay, we will tell you more about Smart City in India in detail.

You can read more Essay Writing about articles, events, people, sports, technology many more.

Long and Short Essays on Smart City in India for Students and Kids in English

A long essay of 450-500 words has been provided it is useful for students in classes 7, 8, 9, and 10. For the reference of students in Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, a short essay of 100-150 words has been provided.

Long Essay on Smart City in India 500 Words in English

Our Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a mission of digital India in which he focused to develop the cities into smart cities. His vision is to come up with 100 smart cities all over India to help the development of the country and open a gateway for global marketing for the benefit of the economy.

The main objective or motive for this project is to improve the lives of the citizens of that city and to upgrade the city in terms of technology, infrastructure, health and sanitization, and transportation. If the city gets evolved then it would be a major boon for the country as the industrial sector would be developed which will result in increased employment opportunities and a rise in the economic and financial condition of the country.

This project is led by the Ministry of Urban Development. The smart city’s mission is to re-establish the urban areas in terms of better education, better health facility, and an educated population. With an improvement in the Cities, the GDP of India will also rise and more and more countries will be interested in collaborating with India for business opportunities.

The major objective of this mission is to supply electricity and an adequate amount of water supply to every house, along with providing services for proper roads and health facilities, increasing the security of the citizens, promoting the proper vehicle and parking facilities, good administration, and much more.

As the Smart city mission is so vast, there are some setbacks in this project. The funds are not adequate, the contribution of the leaders and other ministers is absent, limited skilled labour, and many other problems. But India’s Public Authority is trying its best to get this project back on track so that it will improve the lives of the citizens in the country and also improve their satisfaction.

The smart city project is beneficial for the industrial sector as it will open the passage between India’s metropolitan urban communities like the Chennai-Bangalore corridor, Delhi-Mumbai Corridor, Bangalore-Mumbai monetary corridor to begin with.

Advanced technology will be used to maintain the infrastructure and proper utilization of resources during the entire setup of the project. Automated techniques and sensors will be used to gather information about the citizens and that information will be used to improve the condition of the smart city.

All the infrastructure, gadgets, industries, water supply organization, traffic, and transportation services will be done according to the information provided by the technicians and engineers. With the help of smart cities, India can attract new markets and new industries into the country which will increase the revenue, the employment rate will increase and the economic and financial condition of the country will be more stable.

With this change, we can achieve something big in the future. With the help of the Smart City project, we can make our country developed and open welcome more opportunities for the citizens of the country for a better quality of life. We can work in a more advanced environment and save the resources for future use. With this project, our country will be developed and open to global marketing.

Short Essay on Smart City in India 150 Words in English

Smart cities refer to a city with better technologies and better facilities than the normal city. The main motive behind the movement of smart cities in India is to utilise the resources well rather than wasting them, which can make them go scarce. Also, to enhance the performance of the industries and for the well being of the overall economy of the country.

The smart city movement in India was begun by our leader Narendra Modi. As India is one of the developing countries, our leader has a vision of making it into a developed country so that other countries can invest their money in the organizations led by Indian entrepreneurs.

For the project, the information is gathered with the help of electronic gadgets and sensors. The information and data collected are used to improve the activities taking place in the cities and to develop the infrastructure and services of the city. Smart cities in India would open the doorway for more industrial collaborations as more countries would like to invest in India for better profit.

10 Lines on Smart City in India Essay in English

The concept of a smart city is to utilize a limited amount of resources for better facilities.
In India, the smart city mission is under the Ministry of Urban Development.
In 2016, Narendra Modi introduced this mission with a vision of building 100 smart cities in India.
A total sum of 48,000 crores has been confirmed by the Indian cabinet for this project.
Smart city projects will help in improving the financial condition of the country.
It would be a chance to open the gateway for global marketing in India.
The main foundation of this mission is to provide better facilities such as providing sufficient water supply for all the citizens, and electrical supply in every house.
With the scarcity of skilled labour and not enough contribution from other leaders, this mission is facing a few setbacks.
The smart city mission will improve the lifestyle of people and also provide better employment opportunities.
In the upcoming years, smart cities in India will promote globalisation.

FAQ’s on Smart City in India Essay

Question 1. Who introduced the Digital India Movement?

Answer: Narendra Modi introduced this movement in the year 2016.

Question 2. What is the main motive of the Smart City movement?

Answer: The main motive is to utilize the limited resources for better facilities and safer infrastructure.

Question 3. Which department supervises the Smart City mission?

Answer: The Ministry of Urban Development Department controls the Smart City mission.

Essay on Smart City in India | Smart City in India Essay for Students and Children in English

February 18, 2021 by Prasanna

Essay on Smart City in India: Smart urban areas are spring up everywhere in the world. The advancements in persuasive smart urban communities are starting to examination ways for city tenant to carry on with a superior life that is more secure, cleaner and all the more harmless to the ecosystem.

The smart urban communities innovation give better prerequisites of city living, from self-announcing utilities, bright street lamps and traffic signals, and self-ruling vehicles, to programmed crisis frameworks that make efficiencies, improve the nature of administrations and increment security.

Long and Short Essays on Smart City in India for Students and Kids in English

We are providing students with essay samples on long essay on Smart City in India of 500 words and a short essay on Smart City in India of 150 words on the topic Smart City in India Essay for reference.

You can also find more Essay Writing articles on events, persons, sports, technology and many more.

Long Essay on Smart City in India 500 Words in English

Long Essay on Smart City in India is helpful to students of classes 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.

Smart Cities India is good to turn into the most-crowded country on the planet by 2030, making it the home to the greatest and the most under-entered market for worldwide makers and specialist co-ops. It is going before ages. This rising populace is likewise changing to top-level urban areas of the nation offering increment to new megacities expected to create 80% of financial development, with potential to apply current innovations and framework, advancing better utilization of scant assets.

Smart City mission, is a metropolitan reestablishment and retrofitting program by the public authority of India. On 25th June 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi dispatched this mission to create 100 urban communities with a centre foundation, outfitting innovation and a spotless and economic climate. This mission works under the Ministry of Urban Development direction a sum of 48000 crores has been affirmed by the Indian Cabinet for this mission.

Urban communities oblige 31% of India’s populace and contribute 63 per cent of GDP (statistics 2011). Metropolitan territories are to house 40% of India’s populace and contribute 75% of India’s GDP by 2030. This necessary thorough improvement of physical, institutional, social and financial foundation. The mission’s centre foundation components are sufficient water supply, guaranteed electricity supply, sterilization including soil squander the executives, proficient vehicle, excellent administration, practical climate, well-being and security of residents, hearty it availability and well-being and instruction. The essential segments of an innovative urban areas mission are city improvement (retrofitting) City restoration (redevelopment) and city augmentation (Green Field advancement) in addition to a dish city activity.

There are a few difficulties as well, similar to the low portion of spending plan, absence of focus state coordination, less number of talented labour and cutting edge innovation, debasement at focus and state level and so on, In any case, this issue can be addressed simply by the dynamic support of residents, financing from International bodies like World Bank, the cooperation of private players and Independence to neighbourhood bodies to perceive the need of urban areas in a decentralized manner. Along these lines, the Smart City mission, an imaginative and recent activity by India’s public authority, will drive financial development and improve individuals’ satisfaction.

Each individual will meander each moment to significant Indian urban communities from country territories in search of improved work and better ways of life. Around 843 million individuals are required to live in metropolitan regions. India gets more imaginative approaches to an agreement with multifaceted design, lessens working expense, helps capability and improves personal satisfaction.

Short Essay on Smart City in India 150 Words In English

Short Essay on Smart City in India is helpful to students of classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

A smart city is a metropolitan zone that utilizes various kinds of electronic techniques and sensors to gather information. Bits of knowledge acquired from that information is utilized to oversee resources, assets and administrations productively; consequently, that information is utilized to improve the city’s activities.

This incorporates information gathered from residents, gadgets, structures and resources that are then handled and investigated to screen and oversee traffic and transportation frameworks, power plants, utilities, water supply organizations, squander, wrongdoing location, data frameworks, schools, libraries, clinics, and other local area administrations. Leader Narendra Modi’s thought regarding Digital India has set a spurred plan to assemble 100 smart urban areas the nation over.

The public capital would be insufficient, and the public authority is dealing with visualizing new financing courses to help the program. India’s Smart City plan is essential for a bigger arrangement of the industrial passageway between India’s huge metropolitan urban communities in India like the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, the Chennai-Bangalore Industrial Corridor and the Bangalore-Mumbai monetary Corridor.

10 Lines on Essay on Smart City in India

India’s Smart City plan is essential for a bigger arrangement of the industrial passageway between India’s huge metropolitan urban communities in India like the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, the Chennai-Bangalore Industrial Corridor and the Bangalore-Mumbai monetary Corridor.
Many assembling and attractive focuses will be reproduced as Smart Cities along these hallways.
The Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, which is spread across six states, looks to create seven new smart urban communities as the passageway’s hubs in its first stage.
Some urban areas are now coming up the nation, including Kochi Smart City, Gujarat International Finance Tec-City in Ahmadabad, Naya Raipur in Chhattisgarh, and Lavasa Maharashtra and Wave Infratech’s 4,500-section of the land smart city close to New Delhi.
India has likewise been engaging the unfamiliar organization on the ascent of the smart urban communities. It has sign agreement to fabricate eight urban communities three with Germany, three with the US, and one each with Spain and Singapore.
Smart urban areas are spring up everywhere in the world.
Narendra Modi’s thought regarding Digital India has set a spurred plan to assemble 100 smart urban areas the nation over.
A smart city is a metropolitan zone that utilizes various kinds of electronic techniques and sensors to gather information.
Smart City mission, an imaginative and new activity by India’s public authority, will drive financial development and improve individuals’ satisfaction.
Smart City mission, is a metropolitan reestablishment and retrofitting program by the public authority of India.

FAQ’s on Smart City in India Essay

Question 1. What is the smart city mission?

Answer: India’s Smart City plan is essential for a bigger arrangement of the industrial passageway between India’s huge metropolitan urban communities in India like the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, the Chennai-Bangalore Industrial Corridor and the Bangalore-Mumbai monetary Corridor.

Question 2. What are the plans for the Smart City Scheme?

Answer: Smart Cities India is good to turn into the most-crowded country on the planet by 2030, making it the home to the greatest and the most under-entered market for worldwide makers and specialist co-ops.

Picture Dictionary
English Speech
English Slogans
English Letter Writing
English Essay Writing
English Textbook Answers
Types of Certificates
ICSE Solutions
Selina ICSE Solutions
ML Aggarwal Solutions
HSSLive Plus One
HSSLive Plus Two
Kerala SSLC
Distance Education

The “Smart City” Concept Essay

To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
As a template for you assignment

Recommendations

Could computing was a trend of the decade in the 2000s. The development of the technologies facilitating data transmission over the internet has brought an enormous set of opportunities to be used for the variety of purposes. One of the opportunities is the accumulation of the upcoming data, processing, and transformation into a readable and useful form, using the appropriate software. It is the basis for the projects of a “smart city” like the one that has been successfully launched in Dubuque.

Cloud computing, in this case, is the backbone for as data collection from the variety of the numerous wireless sensors as well as its analysis and effective provision to the end users. Such end users are the Dubuque authorities that receive valuable data as the decision makers and the responsible citizens of the city as the evaluators of the impact the project has on their life in the “smart city.”

The importance of the cloud, in this case, is tremendous due to the need to accumulate and process quite versatile data. Another substantial reason to use cloud computing to support Dubuque’s authorities in this endeavor is the requirement to provide meaningful information to the end users that are distributed throughout the city. The efficient data delivery can be achieved using the variety of the contemporary tools such as mobile applications for iOS, Android, and Windows, for example, or personal web pages that can be accessed from any place in and outside the city. Such simplicity, flexibility, and efficiency of the data accumulation, processing, and provision can be provided by cloud-oriented instruments only.

Finally, the use of the cloud became the only cost-efficient solution these days. The development of the complex proprietary software that would provide the same functionality could be rather costly for the cities like Dubuque. The cloud is the only reasonable choice in this case.

A “smarter city” is the city that tends to balance energy and resources used for its maintenance with sustainable, environment-friendly practices. Additionally, it is the city where people are aware of the benefits provided by the sustainable approach. Resources and energy consumption are top priorities of both the authorities and the citizens of a “smarter city.” More to say, it is not the response to some burning issue or a disastrous problem. It is the conscious choice of the part of the local residents to pursue sustainability through the practices proposed by the authorities. Dubuque is a “smarter city” because it grows and develops in a non-traditional way. It is considered as one of the most progressive sustainable communities in the USA for a reason.

Dubuque is the place where residents can receive what they actually need but not what the city can offer to them. If a citizen of Dubuque wants to pay less money for the electricity consumption or water use, it is necessary to install the required wireless sensors where it is needed and start to generate information. Further analysis of the data provides meaningful information that can be used in the process of decision-making.

Thus, for example, if a house has water leakages, it cannot be determined easily, and the problem remains. In the case of a “smarter” approach, the problem can be solved within a rather short time because the house owner receives measurable and simple to understand data regarding the scale of the issue. The most important issue, in this case, is the determination of the source of the problem. “Smarter cities” are energy- and resources-efficient. Moreover, they are citizen-friendly. Considering these peculiarities, such cities as Dubuque are attractive cities to live in, and it is one of the advantages the concept of a “smarter city” brings to the cities that are eager to embrace it as the core concept of the city functioning.

The major “smarter city” projects in Dubuque are as follows: “smarter water, smarter electric, smarter gas,” and “smarter travel.” Within the “smarter water” project, the citizens of Dubuque received the opportunity to control the process of water consumption in their households. The impact of the program was the statistical data regarding the leakages and water loss in an average household. It appeared a household could lose be up to four gallons per hour in leakages.

The project has provided the data regarding the reduction of water consumption up to 6.6% in the pilot households. Additionally, the data demonstrated the trend of the increased leak detection. It showed the eightfold increase. Such an increase of awareness and consciousness regarding water leaks and consumption respectively should bring nothing but positive results in the future. The less water is used, the lesser efforts must be applied to recycle it for further reuse, so such approach affects other energy consumption areas as well.

Electricity overconsumption is another problem of the majority of the cities in the USA. The project called “smarter electricity” is aimed at the electricity consumption reduction and the increase of cost effectiveness of the Dubuque households, participating in the project. Thus, one of the participants experienced up to 26% of electricity consumption reduction after one year of participating in the pilot project. It meant for this household not only the reduction of electricity consumption but also the cut of the relevant expenditures as well. Therefore, “smarter electricity” is the part of the larger plan of resources consumption reduction in Dubuque. All projects launched in the city at the moment are the parts of the larger project aimed at the improvement and optimization of the resources’ usage.

The next move of Dubuque’s authorities after the successful development and implementation of such projects as “smarter water” and “smarter electricity” is the effort to combine all available information into one set of data to determine the interconnections between the different silos of data. These interconnections can provide the researchers with information regarding the factors that influence the development of the city in the positive and negative ways.

Such a merge of data is necessary to see the bigger picture of the situation in Dubuque and the ways of its improvement. The goal is to create such an information system that would track the current situation, determine the present and upcoming issues, and propose effective steps aimed at its improvement. Currently, these standalone projects provide only the minimal effect as they are aimed at particular areas that can be improved. The analysis of big data will provide Dubuque’s officials with information regarding the areas where improvements are needed first.

Prioritization is another benefit of such a system, so it is important for Dubuque to prioritize steps of the city’s improvement. Joint silos of information will play the most important role in the process of prioritizing the next steps because such a form of data organization will facilitate the analysis of the most comprehensive and full sets of information regarding the costs, expenditures, and issues essential for each strategic area of the Dubuque city’s household. It should be noted that this move would not require additional resources or efforts as data from the currently running projects would be combined and used. It means that such a merger of the projects’ databases should not stop any of the currently running projects.

Dubuque is not the only city in the USA that practices the “smart city” concept. Portland, Oregon, is another American city that extensively uses the tools that information technologies can provide. Microsoft, Forio, and Portland administration managed to obtain information from the variety of government agencies regarding the state of things for the past ten years in more than seventy-five city areas.

The effort resulted in the system that could be used for the variety of purposes and access online. There are several similarities as well as differences in the approaches of the authorities in these two cities. The following similarities can be outlined. The first one is the use of information technologies to collect and process the data about the vital systems of the city. A computerized approach to the data analysis is the most efficient one as of today, so it is used extensively everywhere.

The second similarity is the extent, to which the systems in Portland as well as in Dubuque are used. In both cities, nearly every critical system is explored, evaluated, and controlled using the computerized methods. It helps to respond to the upcoming issues much quicker and thus, provide more efficient and timely solutions in each given situation.

However, there is a drastic difference between the two systems used in these cities. The difference is in the system itself. While Dubuque uses the cloud to read and process the data from the numerous wireless sensors throughout the city, Portland’s authorities decided to go far and ordered the development of the modelling system that could predict and model the events that did not even happen yet. In other words, the system used in Portland is far more advanced than Dubuque’s one in terms of the modeling capabilities, which makes it so advantageous for the city management. The disadvantage is the lack of access to the real-world and up-to-date information as it can be done in Dubuque.

The system in Dubuque is the great achievement of the local authorities. It is the giant step towards the creation of the cost-effective, sustainable, and the environment-friendly community. The use of the cloud technologies and wireless sensors provides numerous opportunities for the further development of the system in the future. Wireless sensors can be installed literally anywhere, so such “smarter” projects can be developed for any critical as well as a non-critical system of Dubuque.

The simplicity of the system’s use is another outstanding achievement of Dubuque’s authorities. It does not require to be technically educated or to have some excessive knowledge in networking technologies to become the participant of the “smarter” projects in the city. It is an excellent idea in terms of involving new participants and obtaining more comprehensive volumes of the data.

The first recommendation is to extend the network of the wireless sensors and include other critical systems to the process of data generation. It should provide Dubuque’s authorities with a better understanding of the current state of things in the city. The next step of the officials should be the effort to create the system that would provide midterm and long-term plans of Dubuque’s development.

The current system provides up to date information only, tracking the changes in consumption rates. It would be wise to develop the system similar to the Portland’s system. Then, the wireless sensor network with its capability of generating real-time data should be integrated into the new planning system. It would add value to the both systems, creating very powerful and useful tool for the control, planning, and decision-making processes.

Summing, the paper explored the project in Dubuque aimed at the development of a “smarter city.” The most important issues were evaluated to provide the in-depth analysis of the current steps of the “smarter” concepts’ implementation. Current projects in Dubuque are very promising, and they appear to be the significant contributors to the process of making the city’s community cost-effective, sustainable, and environment-friendly.

Additionally, the paper explored the experience of the Portland’s authorities in creating and maintaining planning system that is supposed to provide them with information, critical for the decision-making process. The system in Portland appeared to be different but worthy of attention. The appropriate comments were provided to reflect upon the system in Dubuque and its potential. Finally, the relevant and useful recommendations were presented to demonstrate how the system in Dubuque could be improved. The current system required further improvement and development; therefore, the recommendations could be used as the guide.

Communities and Social Change
The Shaping Control of Technology
"Watching TV Makes You Smarter" by Steven Johnson
The City of Portland in Oregon State
Watching TV Makes Us Smarter Debate
The Impact of Technology on Organizational Performance
Technology in Education and Medicine
Thomas Friedman on Globalization and Information Technology
Technological Solutions for American Society of Agronomy
Nicholas Carr's Article "IT Doesn't Matter"
Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, March 23). The "Smart City" Concept. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-smart-city-concept/

"The "Smart City" Concept." IvyPanda , 23 Mar. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/the-smart-city-concept/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'The "Smart City" Concept'. 23 March.

IvyPanda . 2021. "The "Smart City" Concept." March 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-smart-city-concept/.

1. IvyPanda . "The "Smart City" Concept." March 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-smart-city-concept/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The "Smart City" Concept." March 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-smart-city-concept/.

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Urbanization — Smart cities concept

Smart Cities Concept

Categories: Urbanization

About this sample

Words: 427 |

Published: Oct 31, 2018

Words: 427 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

addressing privacy and data protection concerns that could arise from UAV monitoring and surveillance applications;
collision avoidance and conflict resolution in highly populated residential areas;
optimizing path planning, flight scheduling and utilizing shared airspace;(transition) analyzing the current standardization efforts for each of the three aspects in order to identify and prioritize future research questions with the aim of making a contribution towards narrowing the gap between research and technical standardization.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof. Kifaru

Verified writer

Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1233 words

2 pages / 991 words

3 pages / 1521 words

2 pages / 744 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Urbanization And Urbanization During The Renaissance The Renaissance was a period of great cultural, artistic, and intellectual growth in Europe. However, it was also a time of significant urbanization, as cities grew in size [...]

In the landscape of urban development, the term "gentrification" has gained prominence as neighborhoods undergo transformation due to the influx of wealthier residents. This essay delves into the multifaceted problems and [...]

The City of Manila has a population of 1.7 million people and is considered as one of the most polluted cities in the world with notorious traffic congestions. The city of Adelaide is, on the other hand, one of the most liveable [...]

Cities are home to a diverse mix of people and cultures, bustling with activity and opportunity. However, with the ever-increasing population and urbanization, cities also face a range of complex problems. Traffic congestion, [...]

Wood is one of the longest standing building materials in existence… homes built over 10,000 years ago used timber as a primary source for construction materials it is also used as a dominant form of fuel for heat, additionally [...]

Urbanization refers to an increase in population in cities and towns versus rural areas. It is the gradual increase in the proportion of people living in urban areas. There are many causes of urbanization;reasons that make [...]

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

Introduction to Smart Cities

Welcome to the European Edition of the Smart Cities Readiness Guide. It was assembled with contributions from many of the world's leading smart city practitioners – members and advisors of the Smart Cities Council. It is intended to help you plan for the future of your smart city, and to help you develop the action plan that will help you successfully complete your smart city initiatives.

The first goal of the Readiness Guide is to give you a "vision" of a smart city that will help you understand how technology will transform the cities of tomorrow.

The second goal is to help you build the roadmap that will guide your city to the future you envision. It recommends goals you should aim for, best practices that will give you the results you desire with minimal cost and risk. It also encourages flexibility, from the earliest planning stages to completion and implementation – because that flexibility will give you the ability to integrate new technologies and respond quickly to changing citizen demands and needs.

The intended audience for the Readiness Guide is mayors, city managers city planners of all types and their staffs. The intent is to provide cities with objective, vendor-neutral information and recommendations that will help them make the right choices in planning and implementing their smart cities initiatives.

Many cities around the world are working to achieve economic, environmental and social sustainability. Smart city best practices and technologies can be integrated with those existing efforts to support and enhance them.

In this introduction, we define what a smart city is, explain the drivers behind the smart cities movement and briefly touch on the potential barriers and strategies that can help you overcome them. It also provides descriptions of key city issues and many of the relevant topics addressed in the Readiness Guide.

Just as cities are a work in progress, so, too, is this Readiness Guide. This regional guide is based on the principles of the global Smart Cities Council’s Smart Cities Readiness Guide. Rather than make you wait until the entire localization process is completed, we are posting the regional versions of the chapters as we complete them. Until that entire process is complete, you will find that some chapters have a global tone while others are focused on your region. Keep checking back. We are posting the regional chapters as we finish them – roughly one per month. Finally, even after we have completed all the regional chapters, our work is not done. We will continuously modify and add to the chapters as new research, case studies and best practices are completed. Our Readiness Guide is a living document, so please bookmark and refer to it often for the latest guidance.

Taking a holistic view of "city"

Before we define the "smart" piece, we should first deal with the word "city." Real-world smart city examples are rarely a city in the strictest term. Many are more than a single city, such as a metropolitan region, a cluster of cities, counties and groups of counties, a collection of nearby towns or a regional coalition. Other examples are less than a full-scale city, such as districts, neighbourhoods, townships, villages, campuses and military bases. Many municipalities are taking a neighbourhood-by-neighbourhood approach to modernisation, while others are taking a broader city-wide or regional approach.

Because it is in common use, we will continue to use "city" throughout this Guide. But we use it to mean all relevant examples big and small. Regardless of size, we are taking a comprehensive, holistic view that includes the entirety of human activity in an area, including city governments, schools, hospitals, infrastructure, resources, businesses and people.

The definition of a smart city

A smart city uses information and communications technology (ICT) to enhance its liveability, workability and sustainability. First, a smart city collects information about itself through sensors, other devices and existing systems. Next, it communicates that data using wired or wireless networks. Third, it 'crunches' (analyses) that data to understand what's happening now and what's likely to happen next.

Collecting data. Smart devices are logically located throughout the city to measure and monitor conditions. For instance, smart meters can measure electricity, gas and water usage with great accuracy. Smart traffic sensors can report on road conditions and congestion. Smart GPS systems can pinpoint the exact locations of city buses or the whereabouts of emergency crews. Automated weather stations can report conditions. And the mobile devices carried by many city dwellers are also sensors that can – when specifically authorised by their users to do so – collect their position, speed, where they cluster at different times of the day and the environmental conditions around them.

A smart city is self-aware in a way and connects with its citizens. No longer do we have to wonder if a street is congested – the street reports its condition. No longer do we have to wonder if we're losing water to leaks – the smart water network detects and reports leaks as soon as they occur. No longer do we have to guess the progress of the city's garbage trucks – the trucks report where they’ve been already and where they're headed next.

Communicating data. Once you’ve collected the data, you need to send it along. Smart cities typically mix and match a variety of wired and wireless communications pathways, from fibre-optic to cellular to cable. The ultimate goal is to have connectivity everywhere, to every person and every device. Interoperability – the ability of all devices to communicate and work together – is a key requirement.

Crunching data. After collecting and communicating the data, it is analysed for one of three purposes: 1) presenting, 2) perfecting or 3) predicting. If you’ve read about analytics or Big Data, then you may already know about the astonishing things that are possible by analysing large amounts of data. Importantly, analysing data turns information into intelligence that helps people and machines act and make better decisions.

The drivers of smart cities

Powerful forces are converging to make smart cities a growing global trend. As you might guess, there are both positive and negative forces city leaders are strongly advised to monitor.

Growing urbanisation. Cities deliver many benefits – greater employment opportunities, greater access to healthcare and education, and greater access to entertainment, culture and the arts. As a result, people are moving to cities at an unprecedented rate. The UN anticipates the global urban population will increase about 60% by 2050. In other words, two out of three of the world's population will live in urban areas by mid-century. Eurostat, the European Commission's statistical information agency, predicts modest growth for the 28 European Union member countries overall through 2050 and a four-year increase in the median age of the population. Despite modest overall population growth the economies in many European countries are growing quickly and becoming more competitive, a trend that attracts new business to urban areas – and more people.

Growing stress. Today's cities face significant challenges – increasing populations, environmental and regulatory requirements, declining tax bases and budgets and increased costs – at the same time many are experiencing difficult growing pains ranging from pollution, crowding and sprawl to inadequate housing, high unemployment and rising crime rates.

Inadequate infrastructure. Urbanisation is putting significant strain on city infrastructures that were, in most cases, built for populations a fraction of their current size. Much of the developed world has infrastructure that is near or past its design life, requiring massive upgrades. Europe's municipal water distribution networks are a prime example. European water and wastewater utilities are expected to invest US$526 billion between 2016 and 2025 to replace old, leaking water distribution networks .

Growing economic competition. The world has seen a rapid rise in competition between cities to secure the investments, jobs, businesses and talent for economic success. Increasingly, both businesses and individuals evaluate a city’s 'technology quotient' in deciding where to locate. A real challenge for cities with economies based on heavy industry is creating job opportunities that appeal to recent university graduates so they will stay and help build the kind of high-quality workforce that new industries, for instance those in technology, demand. And competition also is in high gear between cities that envision a future as a smart city. They need skilled professionals trained in how to manage and maintain the evolving and complex technologies that make smart cities possible.

Growing expectations. Citizens are increasingly getting instant, anywhere, anytime, personalised access to information and services via mobile devices and computers. And they increasingly expect that same kind of access to city services. While cities in countries such as Finland, Denmark and Germany have a very high level of autonomy, cities in the UK and others generally do not. The Council of European Municipalities and Regions and similar organizations have been pressing the European Union to relax fiscal rules they contend is stifling their ability to make the investments they need to make to ensure sustainability, liveability and adequate services.

Growing environmental challenges. Cities house half of the world's population but use two-thirds of the world's energy and generate three-fourths of the world's CO2 emissions. If we are going to mitigate climate change, it will have to happen in cities. Many regions and cities have aggressive climate and environmental goals – goals that cannot be reached without the help of smart technologies. Smart cities are better able to address resiliency and adaptation to climate change

Rapidly improving technology capabilities. Many of the smart city drivers listed above are negatives – problems that demand solutions. There are positive drivers as well, especially the rapid progress in technology. The costs of collecting, communicating and crunching data have plunged. What's more, much of the needed technology is already in place. For example, many regions have been upgrading their electric power grids to self-monitoring, self-healing smart grids and, to a lesser degree, their water and gas networks. Hundreds of millions of smart meters and smart sensors are now in place, producing valuable data for a smart city. Advances in smart building management systems, e-health, Internet of Things and related technologies and more are among the positive drivers for smart cities.

The barriers to smart cities

Despite the positive drivers, the path to smart cities has obstacles along the way. Members of the Smart Cities Council have worked on thousands of smart city projects all over the world. As they've collaborated with local governments certain consistent barriers have emerged.

Siloed, piecemeal implementations. Cities often tackle challenges in a piecemeal fashion, due to short-term financial constraints and long-term traditions that divide city functions into separate, siloed departments with little interaction. As a result, many projects are built to solve a single problem in a single department, creating "islands of automation" that duplicate expenses while making it difficult to share systems or data.

Building a smart city requires a system-wide view and an integrated, cross-departmental approach. The bad news: holistic thinking and collaborative work are hard. The good news: done right, they can save time and enable new services that were not possible in an isolated, siloed model. For instance, a city department can drastically cut the development time for a new application by re-using data and software modules already created by other departments.

The problem with siloed cities

This is not to suggest that cities must finance and implement dozens of investments at one time. In fact, it is entirely fine to begin with just one or two projects. What is critical is that these projects all fall into a larger, integrated plan that will avoid redundant investments. Silo avoidance depends on the use of widely adopted open international standards.

Lack of financing. Tax revenues are shrinking in many cities, making infrastructure projects increasingly difficult to finance. In fact, some cities have been forced to implement austerity measures – such as furloughing employees one day a month or cutting back on travel and discretionary expenses. Yet if those cities remain old-fashioned while others modernise, they will suffer even more, since cities must now compete globally. Fortunately, new financial models are emerging. Some require little or no upfront capital from the city.

Lack of ICT know-how. Although industry has developed highly sophisticated ICT skills, few city governments have had the budget or the vision to push the state of the art. Since smart cities are essentially the injection of ICT into every phase of operations, this lack of ICT skills puts cities at a disadvantage. Fortunately, more and more applications are offered as a service, which has become a strong, growing trend. That is, they are hosted in the cloud where they have access to tremendous computing power, virtually unlimited storage and innovative software. Another plus is that the smart city sector has developed a large cadre of experienced global, regional and local consultants and service providers who are partnering with cities to deploy ICT solutions.

Lack of integrated services. To the extent cities applied ICT in the past, they applied it to their internal, siloed operations. The result has been a grab bag of aging applications that only city employees can use. Although this was an acceptable practice in the last century, today we can and must allow citizen access and self-service. There is no reason that citizens who want, for instance, to open a restaurant should have to make multiple applications to multiple city departments. In a smart city, a single portal can gather all the data and parcel it out to the appropriate departments. Likewise, residents should have instant access to up-to-the-minute information about their energy and water usage, their taxes and fees, their social services programmes and more. And ideas like Open Data not only improve transparency, they enforce a people-first perspective that is critical in smart cities

The benefits of smart cities

Now let's look at why it is so worthwhile to overcome those barriers and take advantage of the available technologies that allow you to re-imagine your city. With the right planning and investment, government leaders can make cities more liveable, more workable and more sustainable – both economically and environmentally. The following is a very brief and very general summary of the benefits well-planned and implemented smart cities can provide.

Enhanced liveability means a better quality of life for city residents. In the smart city, people have access to a comfortable, clean, engaged, healthy and safe lifestyle. Some of the most highly valued aspects include inexpensive energy, convenient mass transit, good schools, faster emergency responses, clean water and air, low crime and access to diverse entertainment and cultural options.

Enhanced workability means accelerated economic development. Put another way, it means more jobs and better jobs and increased local GDP. In the smart city, people have access to the foundations of prosperity – the fundamental infrastructure services that let them compete in the world economy. Those services include broadband connectivity; clean, reliable, inexpensive energy; educational opportunities; affordable housing and commercial space; and efficient transportation.

Enhanced sustainability means giving people access to the resources they need without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Merriam-Webster defines sustainability as a method of using a resource so that it is not depleted or permanently damaged. When the Council uses the term, it refers not only to the environment, but also to economic realities. Smart cities enable the efficient use of natural, human and economic resources and promote cost saving in times of austerity, and they are careful stewards of taxpayer dollars. It isn't about investing huge sums of money into new infrastructure, it's about making infrastructure do more and last longer for less.

Life is better in a smart city – better for people and better for businesses. In the chapters to come, we will discuss dozens of specific benefits that accrue to cities that embrace the smart city vision.

Ministry of Environment Forests and Climate Change

ADB is committed to achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific, while sustaining its efforts to eradicate extreme poverty.

Established in 1966, it is owned by 68 members—49 from the region..

Annual Reports
Policies and Strategies

ORGANIZATION

Board of Governors
Board of Directors
Departments and Country Offices

ACCOUNTABILITY

Access to Information
Accountability Mechanism
ADB and Civil Society
Anticorruption and Integrity
Development Effectiveness
Independent Evaluation
Administrative Tribunal
Ethics and Conduct
Ombudsperson

Strategy 2030: Operational Priorities

Annual meetings, adb supports projects in developing member countries that create economic and development impact, delivered through both public and private sector operations, advisory services, and knowledge support..

ABOUT ADB PROJECTS

Projects & Tenders
Project Results and Case Studies

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

Public Sector Financing
Private Sector Financing
Financing Partnerships
Funds and Resources
Economic Forecasts
Publications and Documents
Data and Statistics
Asia Pacific Tax Hub
Development Asia
ADB Data Library
Agriculture and Food Security
Climate Change
Digital Technology
Environment
Finance Sector
Fragility and Vulnerability
Gender Equality
Markets Development and Public-Private Partnerships
Regional Cooperation
Social Development
Sustainable Development Goals
Urban Development

REGIONAL OFFICES

European Representative Office
Japanese Representative Office | 日本語
North America Representative Office

LIAISON OFFICES

Pacific Liaison and Coordination Office
Pacific Subregional Office
Singapore Office

SUBREGIONAL PROGRAMS

Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA)
Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Program
Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Program
Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT)
South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC)

With employees from more than 60 countries, ADB is a place of real diversity.

Work with us to find fulfillment in sharing your knowledge and skills, and be a part of our vision in achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable asia and the pacific., careers and scholarships.

What We Look For
Career Opportunities
Young Professionals Program
Visiting Fellow Program
Internship Program
Scholarship Program

FOR INVESTORS

Investor Relations | 日本語
ADB Green and Blue Bonds
ADB Theme Bonds

INFORMATION ON WORKING WITH ADB FOR...

Consultants
Contractors and Suppliers
Governments
Executing and Implementing Agencies
Development Institutions
Private Sector Partners
Civil Society/Non-government Organizations

PROCUREMENT AND OUTREACH

Operational Procurement
Institutional Procurement
Business Opportunities Outreach

The Promise of Smart Cities

Photo essay | 20 july 2021, share this page.

The concept of smart cities is often seen as the glittering solution to many of the world’s urban development challenges. But ‘smartness’ is not solely about the technology or efficiency of systems. In today’s quest for livable and healthy cities, smart is about putting people first.

Lao People's Democratic Republic
Urban development

Latest Photo Essays

Opening up Viet Nam’s Less Explored Tourist Destination Through Digitization

Tajikistan is among the countries with a very high exposure to climate and disaster risks. Around 400 climate-induced incidents (such as avalanches, mudflows, landslides, and flash floods) happen yearly in the country, severely affecting people and the economy. Students of an art school in Tajikistan painted images of the impacts of climate change they’d witnessed in August 2023.

Kyrgyz Republic: A Stronger Health System After COVID-19

An ADB-assisted $20 million COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency Project improved the longer-term capacity of the Kyrgyz Republic’s health system. With ADB support, the Kyrgyz Republic has upgraded 18 hospitals nationwide by expanding and equipping their intensive care units. The project helped procure medical and personal protection equipment, finance minor rehabilitation, and support salary top-ups and other eligible expenses. The project also improved government resilience to future health pandemics and disasters.

Improving Livelihoods in Tajikistan through Better Roads

ADB provides steadfast assistance in improving key road corridors and livelihoods in southern Tajikistan. The assistance includes training activities for empowering the economic capacity of women living near the project roads using a mobile app. Such a comprehensive approach is expected to demonstrate the synergetic effects and eventually contribute to strengthening the region's economic platform.

How to achieve sustainable development of smart city: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis

Published: 22 July 2024

Cite this article

Xizi Luo 1 na1 &
Rui Huang 1 , 2 na1

90 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Growing urbanization and social challenges require innovative solutions to improve urban sustainability. Smart cities can achieve a refined and efficient allocation of resources, which is conducive to intelligent governance and production activities and promotes the realization of sustainable development goals. This paper selects the literature related to smart cities’ sustainable development in the Web of Science database and conducts a systematic literature review using bibliometrics in order to provide a comprehensive assessment of this field. The results of this paper are visualizations of regional cooperation patterns, domain co-citations, and strongest citation bursts. The bibliometric analysis concludes: (1) Smart cities’ sustainable development has entered a stable development stage after a certain period of literature surge. (2) Countries with different development levels continue to cooperate closely, among which countries with close political relations have more cooperative outputs. (3) The research hotspots of smart cities’ sustainable development mainly focus on environment, policy, business, and network sustainability. (4) Intelligent transportation, intelligent energy, and environment sustainability will be the research focus of future intelligent cities to achieve sustainable development.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

Get 10 units per month
Download Article/Chapter or eBook
1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Smart city and sustainability indicators: a bibliometric literature review

Smart-City Development Paths: Insights from the First Two Decades of Research

Smart city research 1990–2016

Explore related subjects.

Artificial Intelligence

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abduljabbar RL, Liyanage S, Dia H (2021) The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transp Res Part D-Transp Environ 92:102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734

Article Google Scholar

Abu-Rayash A, Dincer I (2021) Development of integrated sustainability performance indicators for better management of smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 67:102704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102704

Abu-Rayash A, Dincer I (2023) Development of an integrated sustainability model for resilient cities featuring energy, environmental, social, governance and pandemic domains. Sustain Cities Soc 92:104439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104439

Ackerman K, Conard M, Culligan P, Plunz R, Sutto MP, Whittinghill L (2014) Sustainable food systems for future cities: the potential of urban agriculture. Econ Social Rev 45(2):189–206

Google Scholar

Ahad MA, Paiva S, Tripathi G, Feroz N (2020) Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 61:102301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301

Ahmad RW, Salah K, Jayaraman R, Yaqoob I, Omar M (2021) Blockchain for waste management in smart cities: a survey. IEEE Access 9:131520–131541. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3113380

Aina YA (2017) Achieving smart sustainable cities with GeoICT support: the Saudi evolving smart cities. Cities 71:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.007

Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM (2015) Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J Urban Technol 22(1):3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092

Allam Z, Dhunny ZA (2019) On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 89:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032

Almalki KJ, Jabbari A, Ayinala K, Sung S, Choi BY, Song S (2022) ELSA: energy-efficient linear sensor architecture for smart city applications. IEEE Sens J 22(7):7074–7083. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2022.3154239

Al-Nasrawi S, Adams C, El-Zaart A (2015) A conceptual multidimensional model for assessing smart sustainable cities. JISTEM-J Inform Syst Technol Manag 12(3):541–558. https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752015000300003

Alobidan I (2020) Self-efficacy and academic adjustment’s effect on the academic performance of Saudi Graduate students in US universities

Amorim-Maia AT, Anguelovski I, Chu E, Connolly J (2022) Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Clim 41:101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053

Angelidou M (2015) Smart cities: a conjuncture of four forces. Cities 47:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004

Anh Tuan H, Van Viet P, Xuan Phuong N (2021) Integrating renewable sources into energy system for smart city as a sagacious strategy towards clean and sustainable process. J Clean Prod 305:127161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127161

Anttiroiko A-V, Valkama P, Bailey SJ (2014) Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services. AI Soc 29(3):323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0464-0

Azevedo Guedes AL, Alvarenga JC, Sgarbi Goulart MdS, Rodriguez y Rodriguez MV, Pereira Soares CA (2018) Smart cities: the main drivers for increasing the intelligence of cities. Sustainability 10(9):3121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093121

Baggio R, Micera R, Del Chiappa G (2020) Smart tourism destinations: a critical reflection. J Hosp Tour Technol 11(3):559–574. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-01-2019-0011

Bashir MF, Ma B, Bilal K, Komal B, Bashir MA (2021) Analysis of environmental taxes publications: a bibliometric and systematic literature review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(16):20700–20716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12123-x

Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J Spec Top 214(1):481–518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3

Bednarska-Olejniczak D, Olejniczak J, Svobodova L (2019) Towards a smart and sustainable city with the involvement of public participation—the case of Wroclaw. Sustainability 11(2):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020332

Benavente-Peces C, Ibadah N (2020) Buildings energy efficiency analysis and classification using various machine learning technique classifiers. Energies 13(13):3497. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133497

Bennett NJ, Katz L, Yadao-Evans W, Ahmadia GN, Atkinson S, Ban NC, Dawson NM, de Vos A, Fitzpatrick J, Gill D, Imirizaldu M, Lewis N, Mangubhai S, Meth L, Muhl E-K, Obura D, Spalding AK, Villagomez A, Wagner D, White A, Wilhelm A (2021) Advancing social equity in and through marine conservation. Front Mar Sci 8:711538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.711538

Bibri SE (2018) The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: an analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain Cities Soc 38:230–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.034

Bibria SE, Krogstie J (2017) On the social shaping dimensions of smart sustainable cities: a study in science, technology, and society. Sustain Cities Soc 29:219–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.11.004

Biswas K, Muthukkumarasamy V (2016). Securing smart cities using blockchain technology. high performance computing and communications. 1392–1393. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC-SmartCity-DSS.2016.0198

Bouzguenda I, Alalouch C, Fava N (2019) Towards smart sustainable cities: a review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustain Cities Soc 50:101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627

Buttazzoni A, Veenhof M, Minaker L (2020) Smart city and high-tech urban interventions targeting human health: an equity-focused systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(7):2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072325

Calvillo CF, Sanchez-Miralles A, Villar J (2016) Energy management and planning in smart cities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.133

Cao Y, Zhang G, Ou C (2020) Application of financial cloud in the sustainable development of smart cities. Complexity 2020:8882253. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8882253

Castro GDR, Fernandez MCG, Colsa AU (2021) Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a holistic review. J Clean Prod 280:122204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204

Chen CM (2006) CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(3):359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317

Chen C (2017) Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. J Data Inf Sci 2(2):1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chen C-W (2023) Can smart cities bring happiness to promote sustainable development? contexts and clues of subjective well-being and urban livability. Dev Built Environ 13:100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100108

Chen CM, Morris S (2003). Visualizing evolving networks: minimum spanning trees versus Pathfinder networks. 9th Annual IEEE symposium on information visualization (INFOVIS 2003): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/infvis.2003.1249010

Chernysh Y, Roubik H (2020) International collaboration in the field of environmental protection: trend analysis and COVID-19 implications. Sustainability 12(24):10384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410384

Cui X, Deng W, Yang J, Huang W, de Vries WT (2022) Construction and optimization of ecological security patterns based on social equity perspective: a case study in Wuhan, China. Ecol Indic 136:108714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108714

Dall’O G, Bruni E, Panza A, Sarto L, Khayatian F (2017) Evaluation of cities’ smartness by means of indicators for small and medium cities and communities: a methodology for Northern Italy. Sustain Cities Soc 34:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.021

Dameri RP, Ricciardi F (2015) Smart city intellectual capital: an emerging view of territorial systems innovation management. J Intellect Cap 16(4):860–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-02-2015-0018

D’Auria A, Tregua M, Carlos Vallejo-Martos M (2018) Modern conceptions of cities as smart and sustainable and their commonalities. Sustainability 10(8):2642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082642

de Jong M, Joss S, Schraven D, Zhan C, Weijnen M (2015) Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. J Clean Prod 109:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004

de Oliveira JR, Silva MM, Santos SM, Costa APCS, Negreiros Clemente TR (2021) Multidimensional sorting framework of cities regarding the concept of sustainable and smart cities with an application to Brazilian capitals. Sustain Cities Soc 74:103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103193

Del Vecchio P, Mele G, Ndou V, Secundo G (2018) Creating value from social big data: implications for smart tourism destinations. Inf Process Manage 54(5):847–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.10.006

Deng D, Zhao Y, Zhou X (2017). Smart city planning under the climate change condition. 2nd International conference on materials science, energy technology and environmental engineering (MSETEE), 81: 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/81/1/012091

Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM (2021) How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 133:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2009). VOSviewer: a computer program for bibliometric mapping. 12th International conference of the international-society-for-scientometrics-and-informetrics, 2: 886–897.

Eichelberger S, Peters M, Pikkemaat B, Chan C-S (2020) Entrepreneurial ecosystems in smart cities for tourism development: from stakeholder perceptions to regional tourism policy implications. J Hosp Tour Manag 45:319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.011

Esposito C, Ficco M, Gupta BB (2021) Blockchain-based authentication and authorization for smart city applications. Inf Process Manage 58(2):102468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102468Received23June2020;Receivedinrevisedform

FerroDeGuimaraes JC, Severo EA, Felix Junior LA, Leite Batista Da Costa WP, Salmoria FT (2020) Governance and quality of life in smart cities: towards sustainable development goals. J Clean Prod 253:119926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119926

Forliano C, De Bernardi P, Yahiaoui D (2021) Entrepreneurial universities: a bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 165:120522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120522

Gai K, Wu Y, Zhu L, Xu L, Zhang Y (2019) Permissioned blockchain and edge computing empowered privacy-preserving smart grid networks. IEEE Internet Things J 6(5):7992–8004. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2019.2904303

Gohar A, Nencioni G (2021) The role of 5G technologies in a smart city: the case for intelligent transportation system. Sustainability 13(9):5188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095188

Gong Y (2022) Traffic flow prediction and application of smart city based on industry 4.0 and big data analysis. Math Probl Eng 2022:5397861. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5397861

Gretzel U, Zhong L, Koo C (2016) The applications of smart tourism to cities. Int J Tour Cities 2(2):105–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijtc-04-2016-0007

Grigg N (2022) Economic framework of smart and integrated urban water systems. Smart Cities 5(1):241–250. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010015

Guan L (2012) Smart steps to a battery city. Gov News 32(2):24–27

Gupta J, Vegelin C (2016) Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. Int Environ Agreem Politics Law Econ 16(3):433–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z

Hak T, Janouskova S, Moldan B (2016) Sustainable development goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecol Ind 60:565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003

Hameed K, Barika M, Garg S, Amin MB, Kang B (2022) A taxonomy study on securing blockchain-based Industrial applications: an overview, application perspectives, requirements, attacks, countermeasures, and open issues. J Ind Inf Integr 26:100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100312

Han M, Li Z, He J, Wu D, Xie Y, Baba A, Assoc Comp M (2018) A novel blockchain-based education records verification solution. 19th Annual SIG conference on information technology education (SIGITE): 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241815.3241870

Han MJN, Kim MJ (2021) A critical review of the smart city in relation to citizen adoption towards sustainable smart living. Habitat Int 108:102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102312

Harrison C, Eckman B, Hamilton R, Hartswick P, Kalagnanam J, Paraszczak J, Williams P (2010) Foundations for smarter cities. IBM J Res Dev 54(4):1. https://doi.org/10.1147/jrd.2010.2048257

Harzing A-W (2014) A longitudinal study of google scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013. Scientometrics 98(1):565–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0975-y

Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(46):16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Ho E (2017) Smart subjects for a smart nation? governing (smart) mentalities in Singapore. Urban Stud 54(13):3101–3118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016664305

Hoang AT, Pham VV, Nguyen XP (2021) Integrating renewable sources into energy system for smart city as a sagacious strategy towards clean and sustainable process. J Clean Prod 305:127161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127161

Hornillo-Mellado S, Martin-Clemente R, Baena-Lecuyer V (2020) Prediction of satellite shadowing in smart cities with application to IoT. Sensors 20(2):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020475

Huang-Lachmann J-T (2019) Systematic review of smart cities and climate change adaptation. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 10(4):745–772. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-03-2018-0052

Hussain S, Shahzad M, Appolloni A, Xuetong W (2023a) The impact of public infrastructure project delays on sustainable community development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(14):40519–40533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24739-2

Hussain S, Wang X, Maqbool R (2023b) Understanding the power disruption and its impact on community development: an empirical case of Pakistan. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 55:102922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102922

Ishugah TF, Li Y, Wang RZ, Kiplagat JK (2014) Advances in wind energy resource exploitation in urban environment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 37:613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.053

Ismagilova E, Hughes L, Dwivedi YK, Raman KR (2019) Smart cities: advances in research—an information systems perspective. Int J Inf Manage 47:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004

Ivars-Baidal JA, Vera-Rebollo JF, Perles-Ribes J, Femenia-Serra F, Celdran-Bernabeu MA (2021) Sustainable tourism indicators: what’s new within the smart city/destination approach? J Sustain Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1876075

Ji Y, Yin J (2022) Diffusion characteristics and driving factors of the smart tourism city policy-event history analysis. Sustainability 14(11):6685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116685

Ji Z, Ganchev I, O’Droma M, Zhao L, Zhang X (2014) A cloud-based car parking middleware for IoT-based smart cities: design and implementation. Sensors 14(12):22372–22393. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141222372

Jiang H, Jiang P, Wang D, Wu J (2021) Can smart city construction facilitate green total factor productivity? a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s pilot smart city. Sustain Cities Soc 69:102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102809

Joss S, Sengers F, Schraven D, Caprotti F, Dayot Y (2019) The smart city as global discourse: storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities. J Urban Technol 26(1):3–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1558387

Khan MS, Woo M, Nam K, Chathoth PK (2017) Smart city and smart tourism: a case of Dubai. Sustainability 9(12):2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122279

Khan A, Aslam S, Aurangzeb K, Alhussein M, Javaid N (2022) Multiscale modeling in smart cities: a survey on applications, current trends, and challenges. Sustain Cities Soc 78:103517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103517

Kim H, Choi H, Kang H, An J, Yeom S, Hong T (2021) A systematic review of the smart energy conservation system: from smart homes to sustainable smart cities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 140:110755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110755

Koehler J, Geels FW, Kern F, Markard J, Onsongo E, Wieczorek A, Alkemade F, Avelino F, Bergek A, Boons F, Funfschilling L, Hess D, Holtz G, Hyysalo S, Jenkins K, Kivimaa P, Martiskainen M, McMeekin A, Muehlemeier MS, Nykvist B, Pel B, Raven R, Rohracher H, Sanden B, Schot J, Sovacool B, Turnheim B, Welch D, Wells P (2019) An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions. Environ Innov Soc Trans 31:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004

Kourtit K, Nijkamp P (2012) Smart cities in the innovation age. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 25(2):93–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660331

Kummitha RKR (2020) Why distance matters: the relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 157:120087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120087

Lavalle A, Teruel MA, Mate A, Trujillo J (2020) Improving sustainability of smart cities through visualization techniques for big data from IoT devices. Sustainability 12(14):5595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145595

Lee P, Hunter WC, Chung N (2020) Smart tourism city: developments and transformations. Sustainability 12(10):3958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103958

Lepore D, Testi N, Pasher E (2023) Building inclusive smart cities through innovation intermediaries. Sustainability 15(5):4024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054024

Lewandowska A, Chodkowska-Miszczuk J, Rogatka K, Starczewski T (2020) Smart energy in a smart city: Utopia or reality? Energies 13(21):5795. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215795

Li N, Li RYM (2024) A bibliometric analysis of six decades of academic research on housing prices. Int J Hous Mark Anal 17(2):307–328

Li L, Taeihagh A, Tan SY (2022a) What factors drive policy transfer in smart city development? insights from a Delphi study. Sustain Cities Soc 84:104008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104008

Li RYM, Li B, Zhu X, Zhao J, Pu R, Song L (2022b) Modularity clustering of economic development and ESG attributes in prefabricated building research. Front Environ Sci 10:977887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.977887

Liu S, Liu L, Yang H, Yue K, Guo T (2020) Research on 5G technology based on Internet of things. IEEE 5th Information technology and mechatronics engineering conference (ITOEC): 1821–1823

Lv T, Wang L, Xie H, Zhang X, Zhang Y (2021) Exploring the global research trends of land use planning based on a bibliometric analysis: current status and future prospects. Land 10(3):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030304

Macke J, Casagrande RM, Sarate JAR, Silva KA (2018) Smart city and quality of life: citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. J Clean Prod 182:717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.078

Makhdoom I, Zhou I, Abolhasan M, Lipman J, Ni W (2020) PrivySharing: a blockchain-based framework for privacy-preserving and secure data sharing in smart cities. Comput Secur 88:101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.101653

Mandic A, Pranicevic DG (2019) Progress on the role of ICTs in establishing destination appeal Implications for smart tourism destination development. J Hosp Tour Technol 10(4):791–813. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-06-2018-0047

Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 147:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011

Micozzi N, Yigitcanlar T (2022) Understanding smart city policy: insights from the strategy documents of 52 local governments. Sustainability 14(16):10164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610164

Minoli D, Sohraby K, Occhiogrosso B (2017) IoT considerations, requirements, and architectures for smart buildings-energy optimization and next-generation building management systems. IEEE Internet Things J 4(1):269–283. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2017.2647881

Mohanty SP, Choppali U, Kougianos E (2016) Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: The Internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consum Electron Mag 5(3):60–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/mce.2016.2556879

Moniruzzaman M, Khezr S, Yassine A, Benlamri R (2020) Blockchain for smart homes: Review of current trends and research challenges. Comput Electr Eng 83:106585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106585

Mosannenzadeh F, Vettorato D (2014) Defining smart city. A conceptual framework based on keyword analysis. TeMA—J Land Use Mobil Environ 17:683–694. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2523

Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N (2022) Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. J Bus Res 148:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042

Nam K, Dutt CS, Chathoth P, Daghfous A, Khan MS (2021) The adoption of artificial intelligence and robotics in the hotel industry: prospects and challenges. Electron Mark 31(3):553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00442-3

Nations U (2019) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision: highlights. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Feb/un_2018_wup_highlights.pdf .

Nations U (2023) Sustainable development goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ .

Nizetic S, Djilali N, Papadopoulos A, Rodrigues JJPC (2019) Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. J Clean Prod 231:565–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.397

Obringer R, Nateghi R (2021) What makes a city ‘smart’ in the anthropocene? a critical review of smart cities under climate change. Sustain Cities Soc 75:103278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103278

Perianes-Rodriguez A, Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2016) Constructing bibliometric networks: a comparison between full and fractional counting. J Informet 10(4):1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006

Pradhan P, Costa L, Rybski D, Lucht W, Kropp JP (2017) A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future 5(11):1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000632

Qashlan A, Nanda P, He X, Mohanty M (2021) Privacy-preserving mechanism in smart home using blockchain. IEEE Access 9:103651–103669. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3098795

Qi L, Hu C, Zhang X, Khosravi MR, Sharma S, Pang S, Wang T (2021) Privacy-aware data fusion and prediction with spatial-temporal context for smart city industrial environment. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 17(6):4159–4167. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2020.3012157

Rad TG, Sadeghi-Niaraki A, Abbasi A, Choi S-M (2018) A methodological framework for assessment of ubiquitous cities using ANP and DEMATEL methods. Sustain Cities Soc 37:608–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.024

Rahman MS, Chamikara MAP, Khalil I, Bouras A (2022) Blockchain-of-blockchains: an interoperable blockchain platform for ensuring IoT data integrity in smart city. J Ind Inf Integr 30:100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100408

Ranjbari M, Esfandabadi ZS, Ferraris A, Quatraro F, Rehan M, Nizami A-S, Gupta VK, Lam SS, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M (2022) Biofuel supply chain management in the circular economy transition: an inclusive knowledge map of the field. Chemosphere 296:133968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133968

Ristvej J, Lacinak M, Ondrejka R (2020) On smart city and safe city concepts. Mob Netw Appl 25(3):836–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01524-4

Rizi MHP, Seno SAH (2022) A systematic review of technologies and solutions to improve security and privacy protection of citizens in the smart city. Internet of Things 20:100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2022.100584

Sabory NR, Senjyu T, Danish MSS, Hosham A, Noorzada A, Amiri AS, Muhammdi Z (2021) Applicable smart city strategies to ensure energy efficiency and renewable energy integration in poor cities: Kabul case study. Sustainability 13(21):11984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111984

Shari NFM, Malip A (2022) State-of-the-art solutions of blockchain technology for data dissemination in smart cities: a comprehensive review. Comput Commun 189:120–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.03.013

Shen L, Huang Z, Wong SW, Liao S, Lou Y (2018) A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China. J Clean Prod 200:667–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.281

Shojaei A, Ketabi R, Razkenari M, Hakim H, Wang J (2021) Enabling a circular economy in the built environment sector through blockchain technology. J Clean Prod 294:126352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126352

Silva BN, Khan M, Han K (2018) Towards sustainable smart cities: a review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 38:697–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053

Sontiwanich P, Boonchai C, Beeton RJS (2022) An unsustainable smart city: lessons from uneven citizen education and engagement in Thailand. Sustainability 14(20):13315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013315

Staletic N, Labus A, Bogdanovic Z, Despotovic-Zrakic M, Radenkovic B (2020) Citizens’ readiness to crowdsource smart city services: a developing country perspective. Cities 107:102883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102883

Su K, Li J, Fu H (2011). Smart city and the applications. IEEE International conference on electronics, communications and control (ICECC): 1028–1031. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECC.2011.6066743

Su Y, Fan D (2023) Smart cities and sustainable development. Reg Stud 57(4):722–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2106360

Tadili J, Fasly H, Acm (2019) Citizen participation in smart cities: A survey. 4th International conference on smart city applications (SCA): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368756.3368976

Tanguay GA, Rajaonson J, Lefebvre J-F, Lanoie P (2010) Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecol Ind 10(2):407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013

Theresa A, Pardo T, Nam J, Ramon G-G (2015) What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Inf Polit 20(1):61–87

Tong K, Ramaswami A, Xu C, Feiock R, Schmitz P, Ohlsen M (2021) Measuring social equity in urban energy use and interventions using fine-scale data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118(24):e2023554118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023554118

Trencher G, Karvonen A (2019) Stretching “smart”: advancing health and well-being through the smart city agenda. Local Environ 24(7):610–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1360264

N Tripathi, KK Sharma, U Pandey (2022) Analytical review on satellite communication: benefits, issues, and future challenges. International conference on small satellites (ICSS) 987:159 166 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8555-3_18

van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Velenturf APM, Purnell P (2021) Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain Prod Consum 27:1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018

Viale Pereira G, Schuch de Azambuja L (2022) Smart sustainable city roadmap as a tool for addressing sustainability challenges and building governance capacity. Sustainability 14(1):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010239

Viitanen J, Kingston R (2014) Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environ Plan A 46(4):803–819. https://doi.org/10.1068/a46242

Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM (2010) A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informet 4(4):629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002

Wang CD, Wang Z (1998) Evaluation of the models for Bradford’s law. Scientometrics 42(1):89–95

Wang D, Li X, Li Y (2013) China’s “smart tourism destination” initiative: a taste of the service-dominant logic. J Destin Mark Manag 2(2):59–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.05.004

Wang C, Lim MK, Zhao L, Tseng M-L, Chien C-F, Lev B (2020) The evolution of Omega-the International journal of management science over the past 40 years: a bibliometric overview. Omega-Int J Manag Sci 93:102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.08.005

Wang J, Lim MK, Wang C, Tseng M-L (2021) The evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) over the past 20 years. Comput Ind Eng 155:107174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107174

Wang X, Wang G, Chen T, Zeng Z, Heng CK (2023) Low-carbon city and its future research trends: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Sustain Cities Soc 90:104381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104381

Wang YJ (2020). Study of energy-efficient architecture address utilizing topography and geomorphology based on Google Earth and its remote sensing data. 2nd International conference on geoscience and environmental chemistry (ICGEC), 206: 01020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020601020

Wathne MW, Haarstad H (2020) The smart city as mobile policy: Insights on contemporary urbanism. Geoforum 108:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.12.003

Weiss CVC, Menendez M, Ondiviela B, Guanche R, Losada IJ, Juanes J (2020) Climate change effects on marine renewable energy resources and environmental conditions for offshore aquaculture in Europe. ICES J Mar Sci 77(7–8):3168–3182. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa226

Wilson B, Chakraborty A (2019) Planning smart(er) cities: the promise of civic technology. J Urban Technol 26(4):29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1631097

Wu H, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Tong L, Wang F, Song S, Xu L, Liu B, Yan H, Sun Z (2021) Current state and future directions of intranasal delivery route for central nervous system disorders: a scientometric and visualization analysis. Front Pharmacol 12:717192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.717192

Yadav G, Mangla SK, Luthra S, Rai DP (2019) Developing a sustainable smart city framework for developing economies: an Indian context. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101462

Yamasaki K, Yamada T (2022) A framework to assess the local implementation of sustainable development goal 11. Sustain Cities Soc 84:104002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104002

Yigitcanlar T, Kamruzzaman M, Foth M, Sabatini-Marques J, da Costa E, Ioppolo G (2019) Can cities become smart without being sustainable? a systematic review of the literature. Sustain Cities Soc 45:348–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033

Zeng L, Li RYM (2022) Construction safety and health hazard awareness in web of science and Weibo between 1991 and 2021. Saf Sci 152:105790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105790

Zeng L, Li RYM, Zeng H (2023) Weibo users and Academia’s foci on tourism safety: implications from institutional differences and digital divide. Heliyon 9(3):e12306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12306

Zhang J, Xu L, Shabunko V, Tay SER, Sun HX, Lau SSY, Reindl T (2019) Impact of urban block typology on building solar potential and energy use efficiency in tropical high-density city. Appl Energy 240:513–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.033

Zhang N, Zhao X, He X (2020) Understanding the relationships between information architectures and business models: an empirical study on the success configurations of smart communities. Gov Inf Q 37(2):101439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101439

Zhang J, Song L, Xu L, Fan Y, Wang T, Tian W, Ju J, Xu H (2021) Knowledge domain and emerging trends in ferroptosis research: a bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis. Front Oncol 11:686726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.686726

Zhang J, Wang Q, Xia Y, Furuya K (2022a) Knowledge map of spatial planning and sustainable development: a visual analysis using CiteSpace. Land 11(3):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030331

Zhang X, Zhao Y, Jin F, Sun W (2022b) Tracking hot spots of sustainable development research in domestic and foreign literature in the past twenty-five years: bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. J Univ Chin Acad Sci 39(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.7523/j.ucas.2020.0006

Zhang J, Li S, Wang Y (2023) Shaping a smart transportation system for sustainable value co-creation. Inf Syst Front 25(1):365–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10139-3

Zheng Z, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Wen C (2020). TCMKG: A deep learning based traditional chinese medicine knowledge graph platform. 11th IEEE International conference on knowledge graph (IEEE ICKG): 560–564. https://doi.org/10.1109/icbk50248.2020.00084

Zubizarreta I, Seravalli A, Arrizabalaga S (2016) Smart city concept: what it is and what it should be. J Urb Plan Dev 142(1):04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000282

Download references

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Xizi Luo and Rui Huang have contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, People’s Republic of China

Xizi Luo & Rui Huang

Shenzhen International Graduate School (SIGS), Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Rui Huang was involved in conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, supervision, writing, reviewing, and editing. Xizi Luo helped in methodology, software, data curation, investigation writing—original draft, writing—reviewing, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Huang .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Luo, X., Huang, R. How to achieve sustainable development of smart city: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Clean Techn Environ Policy (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02945-5

Download citation

Received : 05 September 2023

Accepted : 07 July 2024

Published : 22 July 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02945-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Sustainable
Bibliometrics analysis
Visualization
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

Essay: On the smart city; Or, a ‘manifesto’ for smart citizens instead

Please note: This piece has moved over here, in the publication But What Was The Question? at Medium . Please read, and link to, that version instead.

———–

Oh, the smart city . I have “previous” here, over about a decade of writing about the interplay between cities and technology. And particularly, having written about The Street As Platform , and the Personal Well-Tempered Environment , and The Adaptive City , and about New Songdo City , and "new smokestacks" , and how it’s easier to crowd-source a revolution than a light-rail system , and so on. And then worked on many projects, which I hope to scribble more about one day here, from Barangaroo to Brickstarter , Masdar to Melbourne .

During this time, what we might call a Urban Intelligence Industrial Complex (led by IBM, Cisco, General Electric, Siemens, Philips et al) has emerged and continues to try to insert itself into urban agendas; with little success, in comparison to the marketing spend, it must be said. One can imagine a quiet fading away of all those “Smarter Planet” promotional schemes soon, actually.

But it’s clearly not an idea that’s going to go away (for reasons good and bad.) I was be asked by both the London School of Economics and Volume magazine , separately, to write about the smart city (both were related to different speaking engagements.)

The piece for the LSE was a contribution to their Electric City conference newspaper (thanks Philipp Rode and Ricky Burdett). I spoke there about the Brickstarter project we started in Helsinki alongside many great contributions from the likes of Richard Sennett, Anthony Giddens, Saskia Sassen, Adam Greenfield, Greg Lindsay, Michael Kimmelman, Alejandro Zaero-Polo, Erik Spiekermann, Richard Rogers and others, all of whom lined up to critique the smart city idea, essentially. My talk was a little too hurried, I’m afraid, and I felt I failed to connect—which partly spurred me to present the following piece here.

While the LSE piece was written before Electric City, the Volume article was partly reflecting on an event in Rotterdam organised by the fascinating International New Towns Institute (only in the Netherlands, eh?), where I moderated a panel on New Songdo City. Their latest issue presents four case studies of new towns which can be seen as “smart cities” to some extent (Living PlanIT’s PlanIT Valley, near Oporto in Portugal; Lavasa in India; Strand East in London; New Songdo in South Korea). Really, however, they are contemporary variants on the new town idea—what Volume call “the city in a box” approach.

(Writer’s note: This may only be interesting to me, but faced with writing two pieces in quick succession, when I have essentially a single line of critique, I first of all did what I usually do, as regular readers know—I wrote too much—and produced one piece. I then snapped this in two, trimmed around the edges, and gave one half to LSE and the other to Volume, for further edits. Both published pieces have a distinct and self-contained critique, but they spring from same source, and both suggest the key idea of “smart, engaged citizens”. I’ve stitched them back together into one whole, cleaned up a bit and added a few ornamental details, and am sharing here as one single critique of the smart cities movement. It is different to the original, and so a fourth variation on a theme. It’s a peculiarly baroque and labour-intensive outcome (oh to be able to write precisely first time round) but as a process it had a certain value.)

So, as a whole this is different to the pieces published by LSE and Volume , but is constructed from the basic components of both. I hope you can’t see the join. Look carefully nonetheless, as this might appear at first glance like a destructive critique of technology in the city. It is not. Technology is culture; it is not something separate; it is no longer “I.T.”; we cannot choose to have it or not. It just is, like air. There are different forms of technology in different cities, of course, but given that technology and culture have fused (arguably, always had) the issue is now a cultural one; what kind of culture do we want in our cities? How do we orient ourselves, with regards to today’s particular technological cultures?

We know how our cities were oriented as regards irrigation, language, currency, double-entry book-keeping, clocks, looms, trains, sewage, power plants, elevators, cars, containers—these are all forms of technology, which were in some way aligned to, and sprang from, the core urban dynamics of their age (and perhaps those eternal urban drivers of culture and commerce.)

So, how do we orient our cities as regards The Network? And how might this then address the core issues of our age?

So the goal is entirely constructive, and to shift the debate in a more meaningful direction, oriented towards the raison d’etre of our cities: citizens, and the way that they can create urban culture with technology.

Although it says “manifesto” up there, this is not a manifesto in the sense that Marinetti would write one—probably for the best—but instead a quest for the right questions. As such, you might infer your own manifesto from it (even in opposition to it!)

The essay surveys three types of activities, and scenarios, demonstrating active citizens, noting some issues along the way, and then critiques the opposite—the production of passive citizens—before asking a couple of questions and suggesting some key shifts in attitude required to positively work with the grain of today’s cultures, rather than misinterpret it. (Read on below.)

On the smart city; A call for smart citizens instead

Big data + social media = urban sustainability?

The promise of smart sustainable cities is predicated on the dynamics of social media alloyed to the Big Data generated by an urban infrastructure strewn with sensors. Feedback loops are supposed to engage citizens and enable behaviour change, just as real-time control systems tune infrastructure to become more energy efficient. Social media dynamics enable both self-organisation and efficient ecosystems, and reduce the need for traditional governance, and its associated costs.

Yet is there a tension between the emergent urbanism of social media and the centralising tendencies of urban control systems? Between the individualist biases inherent within social media and the need for a broader civic empathy to address urban sustainability? Between the primary drivers of urban life and the secondary drivers of infrastructural efficiency?

And in terms of engaging citizens, we can certainly see evidence of increased interest in using social media for urban activism, from crowdfunding platforms to Occupy Everywhere and the Arab Spring. Yet does it produce any more coherence or direction for the new cultures of decision-making required in our cities, or simply side-step the question of urban governance altogether? And what if the smart city vision actually means that governance becomes ever more passive, as it outsources operations to algorithms or is side-stepped by social media, whilst citizens also become passive in response to their infrastructure becoming active? Or might they be too distracted to notice as they’re all trying to crowd-fund a park bench?

This essay is peppered with such questions, not because there are no hints or pathways ahead, but because we tend to spend little time on framing our problems with care. As the British architect Cedric Price said in the mid-1960s: “Technology is the answer. But what is the question?”

Efficiency as cul-de-sac

Instead of the smart city, perhaps we should be more preoccupied with smart citizens. The smart city vision tends to focus on infrastructure, buildings, vehicles, looking for a client amidst the city governments that procure or plan such things.

But the city is something else.

The city is its people. We don’t make cities in order to make buildings and infrastructure. We make cities in order to come together, to create wealth, culture, more people . As social animals, we create the city to be with other people, to work, live, play. Buildings, vehicles and infrastructure are mere enablers, not drivers. They are a side-effect, a by-product, of people and culture. Of choosing the city.

The smart city vision, however, is focused on these second order outcomes, and often with one overriding motivation: efficiency. Yet the city’s primary raison d’être is to be found amidst its citizens. If we look there, we find that there is more, much more, to urban life than efficiency. In fact, many of those primary drivers are intrinsically inefficient, or at least at a tangent to the entire idea of efficiency. Can a city be “smart” and inefficient at the same time? Perhaps this is a fundamental question, un-voiced by smart city advocates.

We might argue that smartening the infrastructure enables citizens to make informed decisions, and this is certainly true. But the infrastructure’s output is hugely limited—it might speak to patterns of resource use, but gives us little detail or colour in terms of those original starting points for the city, which tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, slippery, elusive, transient, subjective.

So to see the city as a complex system to be optimised, made efficient, is to read the city along only one axis, and hardly a primary one at that.

Enter the smart citizens

We must look somewhere else for inspiration, to the most important aspect of smart cities. That would be smart citizens.

Fear not, because as it happens, all around us, in cities worldwide, we see evidence of smart citizens—that is, citizens using social media and related technologies to organise and act. Despite the heavy infrastructure-led visions of the systems integrators and IT corporations, the most interesting and productive use of contemporary technology in the city is here, literally in the hands of citizens, via phones and social media.

The dynamics of social media have been adopted and adapted in the last few years to enable engaged and active citizens to organise rapidly and effectively; a network with a cause.

Occupy Everywhere is part-enabled by Twitter, just as Facebook helped tip over various perturbation points that fuelled the Arab Spring. We see it less helpfully, if minimally, implicated in the UK riots, partly brought to you by Blackberry Messenger. (Incidentally, it’s worth noting that the allegations that social media helped “cause” or drive those riots are surely flawed; after all, people have previously managed to riot quite successfully, for quite some time, without Blackberrys. What is entirely new is a nation-wide mass clean-up the morning after organised over Twitter (#riotcleanup) . That had never happened before in urban history.)

( Update : Note also the success of Beppe Grillo's Movimento 5 Stelle in the recent Italian elections . Without spending a cent on advertising, and refusing to appear at all on any mainstream media, this party won more votes than any other. That is unheard of in a major western democracy—if not almost unthinkable, just months ago. And how? Grillo's party took to piazza after piazza, every single night of the campaign, holding huge rallies to rapt crowds, in a distinctly non-institutional mode. But they also used social media extremely adeptly, in a way that left the traditional political parties trailing in their wake (masterminded by 5 Stelle's Gianroberto Casaleggio .) Arab Spring was partly Tahrir Square + Facebook. Occupy was partly Zuccotti Park + Twitter. As the UK doesn't really do piazzas, the British equivalent was the high street + Blackberry Messenger. And so the Grillo phenomenon is the piazza + social media too. So we see social media-driven activism finding a foothold in the essentially ancient urban form of the square—the two work together, with the dynamics of social media manifesting themselves in these relatively open urban forms (Q. Would it even work as powerfully without the piazza?)

We also see the dynamics of social media behind a flurry of crowd-sourced, crowd-funding platforms, driven by the exponential growth and increasingly disruptive success of Kickstarter, with 2012 alone witnessing numerous new platforms aimed at engaging citizens in the collaborative development of their own city.

Both strains of activism—crowds, and crowdsourcing—will be unpicked a little more below.

All of these are involved in questions of sustainability, one way or another, at least in terms of triple-bottom-line and beyond (economic and social as well as environmental), with several aimed directly at sustainable outcomes, on the basis that we have all the technology and capital we need to create sustainable cities—our problem is rather that we can’t agree what to do next. So these are platforms for agreeing .

“Smart citizens” seem to be emerging at a far faster rate than we’re seeing more formal technology-led smart cities emerging. This smart city needs no marketing campaign, and little in the way of new urban infrastructure—it relies on loosely joined internet infrastructure overlaid onto the city, and the fact that the city has become the organising principle for humanity. This speaks to a genuine interest, desire, and facility with these platforms amongst citizens—people are voting with their feet. What we are really seeing is active, engaged citizens—“smart” is too loaded a term, too easily co-opted, and unhelpfully vague. This activity is heartening; in the face of institutional collapse, active citizens are knitting together their own smart city, albeit not one envisaged by the systems integrators and technology corporations.

But do they enable more complex decision-making? Isn’t this where Occupy falls over, or the Arab Spring gets wintry?

There are a few dots on the radar that describe systems that might enable a more sustained form of engagement. While they borrow the dynamics, modes and functionality of social media, they needn’t rely on them, and all preference a form of public, physical engagement with urban fabric.

Moving beyond the successful "platforms-for-complaining" like FixMyStreet and SeeClickFix, some attempt to open up urban planning, design and operations to the community. Others indicate a subtle side-stepping of bureaucracy, trying to engage citizens directly, sidestepping a city in technocrat-mode.

Active citizens 1: 2011, Social media and the year of Peak News

There are weak signals that, as institutional frameworks continue to crumble, citizens are increasingly actively engaged in decision-making about their city. Again, at its most viscerally obvious, we can see it in Tahrir Square, Occupy Everywhere, Croydon, Athens, or the underreported protests in urban China. But beyond those flashpoints, we can also see numerous examples of a more systemic change: urban activism becoming urban activity. All these phenomena rely on the dynamics, modes and functionality of social media. They enable the heroic efforts of urban activists of the past—those who produced New York’s High Line, London’s Coin Street, or Renew Newcastle in Australia, say—to be shared, copied, translated and scaled.

Through the lens of democratising urban planning, we see examples like “Sub-Plan” in the UK and “Tallinna Planeeringute Juhend” in Tallinn: simple, user-centred guidebooks explaining how to exploit loopholes in urban planning legislation to more creatively and proactively rework your city. We can see movements like Friends of Arnold Circus in London, where the community has brokered a deal with its cash-strapped municipal government such that local maintenance is a shared responsibility. The outcome is that what used to be a dilapidated, syringe-strewn, rusty Victorian bandstand is now an active and well-tended community garden. Similarly, in Berlin, we see the residents of Schöneberg creating and maintaining their own planter boxes outside their apartment blocks, sometimes asking the city government for permission, sometimes not. As each apartment block is different, the streets become patterned with a playful expression of Berlin’s rich diversity. It’s an entirely informal urbanism, taking root in the cracks left by urban planning, city governance and market forces. But does it scale beyond the window-dressing of tactical planter boxes?

In Helsinki, Ravintolapäivä (Restaurant Day) started in 2011 and now runs every few months, with hundreds of diverse pop-up restaurants peppering the streets, effortlessly circumventing the city government by exploiting legal grey areas or simply relying on strength in numbers, common sense, and clear public demand ( as discussed previously .) Created in response to overly repressive, cumbersome and outdated legislation, the festival was devised and organised by a small group of friends, in emergent fashion, coordinated via Facebook and Twitter. The resulting “Ravintolapäivä” was essentially a set of instructions, and you can’t arrest a set of instructions. You can't arrest code . There is no there, there. It would be like trying to arrest smoke, and consequently the City, the biggest bureaucracy in the country, was sidestepped easier than the Maginot Line. The streets are suddenly full on Restaurant Days, a vivid expression of how fast Helsinki is diversifying, with people you don’t usually see enjoying a diverse range of food you can’t usually eat—empenadas cooked by Argentinians, crepes by French, lasagna by Italians, as well as smoked reindeer from the Finns. To locals, it must feel like a new Helsinki emerging from within the hardened shell of the old.

But interestingly, while such events are a kind of slow-release capsule in changing the culture of the city, changing the stories that the city tells about itself, such pop-ups do not strategically create systemic change, just as Occupy, Arab Spring and UK Riots have not projected any kind of suggestion for a new, resilient decision-making culture. Though it has spread throughout Finland and worldwide—a major marketing success the municipality can barely mention, as Ravintolapäivä still hovers in Helsinki’s legal grey areas—Restaurant Day is largely a phenomenon enjoyed by urban hipsters, and is here today, gone tomorrow. The only problem with Restaurant Day is the Day After Restaurant Day . There, the city snaps back to its previous shape, with no diverse food offering, little creative use of the street, and the hardening chrysalis of the old city visible again.

Events can change the city, clearly—hence the vast investments in Olympics and Expos as well as bottom-up riots—but their effects are slow, unpredictable and spotty.

Yet what these new tools suggest, due to the platform characteristics of social media, is a more rapid, even, and sustained change might be possible. The tools could be used to create a new interface on the city that could, potentially, alter the way that most citizens interact with it.

Moreover, behavioural psychology tells us of the importance of people actually doing things, when attempting to engender significant behaviour change.

It turns out that changing behaviour is a way to subsequently change attitudes; this is entirely counter the thinking behind many smart systems , which are predicated on feedback loops delivering information to people, whose attitudes then change, and who then choose to change their behaviour accordingly. Instead, behaviour change happens through changing behaviour, and then attitudes.

It is not enough to simply “make the invisible, visible” , to use the already well-worn phrase in urban informatics. But change might happen through creating convenient, accessible ways to try something different, and then multiplying that through social proof and network effects, reinforcing through feedback. (This means all those smart meters are a complete waste of time and money, and will eventually have to be uninstalled.)

Active learning—say, by trying out that idea for a pop-up café, without having to commit to it—also enables social proof. Others take part in it. And this, in turn, encourages further activity. This drive towards enabling activity—physical activity in streets, embedded within digital activity, at one and the same time—is also the future of communications concerned with meaningful change: it is no longer enough to convey the image; you have to convey the tools too.

Active citizens 2: 2012, crowdfunding platforms and the year of collaborative city-making

Running along parallel tracks, numerous cities have witnessed an explosion in crowd-sourcing and crowd-funding platforms throughout 2012. Following in the wake of the increasingly high-profile crowdfunding platform Kickstarter, and almost popping up at the rate of one every couple of weeks over the year, these include Neighborland, In Our Backyard (IOBY), YIMBY, SpaceHive, Brickstarter, Neighbor.ly , Change By Us, Give A Minute, Smallknot, Joukkoenkeli, Lucky Ant, Voorderkunst, I Make Rotterdam, as well as several more general crowdfunding services occasionally bent into shape to serve as urban incubators (Indiegogo, PeopleFundIt, PleaseFundUs, Crowdfunder, and Kickstarter itself).

The basic notion is that someone thinks of and pitches a local project, and people in the community “back” that idea, typically donating small amounts of funding. The network effects of social media enable an aggregation, whilst the architecture of contemporary websites enabled the projects to be tracked, discussed, updated, voted upon, and so on. (See Brickstarter.org for a more thorough unpacking of these ideas.)

All these systems are predicated on the idea that citizens want to engage in their city; that implicitly, citizens are best-placed to notice, suggest, aggregate and drive a certain kind of urban intervention. This “Kickstarter urbanism“, like Kickstarter itself, is typically oriented towards the small things in cities—let’s turn this parking lot into a community garden; let’s start a co-working space; let’s start a bike-sharing scheme—rather than taking on urban governance models, or attempting to fund large-scale infrastructure.

This in itself is no criticism: what city wouldn’t benefit if people started caring about the small things? But is there is a lingering sense that this might be a little “bread and circuses”? A stream of micro-distractions to occupy the community while the big boys in government get on with the big stuff—education, transit systems, energy policy, grand civic buildings, and so on.

Of course, the basic model of crowd-funding currently limits the capital it might produce, even for dense neighbourhoods. Kickstarter can generate tens of millions of dollars at best, which is a lot for a watch but doesn’t get near the investment required for a light-rail system, say. And the average Kickstarter project raises under USD10k, on a global platform, often promoting global projects. Most urban projects are intrinsically not global, but highly local, limiting the size of the crowd that might fund, whilst asking the basic question of who decides what is best locally, when using a global platform.

Equally, crowdfunding could have a political edge, consciously or not, in that raising capital directly from particular members of a community could impact upon a municipality's capability to raise money through taxation. Crowdfunding could inadvertently become a substitution for taxation. If these are public projects—and they tend to be—then why does the municipality not fund them via the public purse?

Besides, money speaks rather loudly in crowdfunding systems. A wealthy local resident could increase the likelihood that a project might happen simply by dropping a million euros on it. Such systems tend to use a financial target as primary organising object, rather than its potential appropriateness, quality or any more thorough assessment of need or desire. There is nothing intrinsically democratic about social media . (Of course, we might argue that this is still an improvement on a situation where only a few large players—developers and governments, primarily—can really promote and progress projects, also through their sheer weight of capital.)

We should not pretend that hitching our decision-making apparatus to crowdfunding is in any way a more "democratic" approach, or that it will necessarily produce more appropriate or beneficial local solutions. Whilst it might increase transparency in urban development, which could lead to increased accountability, this is not necessarily a given. Any system so clearly oriented around simple accretion of financial capital will be easily gamed by those who happen to already possess large wads of said financial capital.

So, it is indeed easier to crowdsource a revolution than a light-rail system. We can generate an Arab Spring, but when a contemporary platform like Neighborland, for example, tries to influence the likelihood of a commuter rail extension in Denver, it can attract only 51 “neighbours” backing it. Their well-meaning comments are unlikely to change the situation much—that billions of dollars would need to be found, somehow, from within a culture not predisposed to funding sustainable public transit. Neighborland is a wonderful example of a new platform, but in itself it is not enough to create a new decision-making culture for making more sustainable decisions. It might however contains the seeds of such a thing, if we see it as a sketch rather than a solution.

For we need to bind the energy and dynamics of social media—those active citizens—to active government too . Government is partly there to take such disruptive innovations and productively absorb them into a resilient system that smoothes social inequalities and generates broader access. How should Helsinki take the spirit of Ravintolpäivä and learn from it, to shape its own regulations and culture such that the city benefits from better-quality street food, a facility with diverse urban cultures, and more active, democratic use of the street? Can we enable systemic outcomes rather than simply one-offs?

Equally, crowdfunding systems, by their very nature, will rarely enable a systemic change. They create a tapestry of one-offs and events, but will rarely generate city-wide services or infrastructure. While this might or might not be a problem, depending on the service in question and your point-of-view, the ability to shape legislation, governance and effective services in order to produce urban social equity (or mobility) must surely depend on watching, listening, learning, and acting in response.

Active citizens 3: A suggested precursor, in shared space

Perhaps an equally active form of governance, in a symbiotic relationship with active citizens, is required to take such emergent activity and productively absorb it into the city more broadly. This might look to concieve these activities as strategic rather than simply tactical, through participating. It would enable a city to stop being Maginot Line 'd and instead imagine how each one-off pop-up might actually be thought of as a Trojan Horse for a wider systemic change.

So how might we build systems that create active users within active governance, systemically? Rather than look to Silicon Valley for inspiration, we might instead look for a precedent in the unlikely location of an intersection in a small town in the Netherlands.

Hans Monderman's "shared space" traffic system, designed and implemented in many places from the 1980s onwards, removes all signage and formal “rules" from intersections, instead relying on human interaction—people looking each other in the eyes and making shared decisions, in an network of interdependent trust. Cars, lorries, bikes and pedestrians come together in the same place and negotiate their way through together. Everything slows down, but nothing stops.

This is the safest way to design an intersection. Add traffic lights to this, and we get more accidents, not fewer.

So one can design a system, or culture, in which individual actors are aware that they are part of a wider interdependent system of complex movements, with positive end results—safer, smoother—at a systemic level as well as individual.

Wonderfully, it believes in people; it rewards trust, and demonstrates that this is viable.

It requires governance, to help shape a city that can work in such a way ( Search YouTube for “shared space Monderman” and you’ll find videos demonstrating that the Dutch examples are all relatively dense—though not high density—environments with active streetfronts and wide pavements. It wouldn’t work where peoples’ idea of urban space is something you drive through at speed. But then what would?)

Removing all "regulation" at this micro-level turns out to be the safe and effective thing to do as it relies on active citizens, not abdicating responsibility for wider systems and acting as an individual or outsourcing the decision-making to traffic lights. So removing regulation, though not governance, here implies far greater personal responsibility. It is not simply "self-interested actors maximising personal gain”—it relies on smart, engaged, aware and active citizens, rather than the passive systems that smart city visions are often predicated upon.

Passive citizens 1: not so smart

Ironically, given Monderman’s shared space, those currently promoting the idea of “driverless cars” talk of being able to remove traffic lights due to automation. With active citizens, Monderman indicated we don’t need technology to remove the lights.

Smart buildings have systems that automatically turn off lights in meeting rooms, leading to the absurd sights of people leaping to their feet and waving their arms in the air to trigger a light sensor. Look at what such systems do to us!

Smart buildings also turn off our desk lamps for us. Can we not turn off our own desk lamp when we leave the office? We used to be able to, when energy has been more closely managed in the past. In fact, does removing the conscious decision-making element make us less likely to be aware, to care, about our impact on the environment? Are we becoming passive citizens in response to our systems getting smart? Will this approach really lead to a sustainable city for people?

Part of the promise of the events previously mentioned is that they begin to deal with the asymmetry of power in urban decision-making. The fact that citizens can now rapidly organise more quickly and more effectively than bureaucracies is a useful brake on the technocratic approaches typical to city governments. It could be even more useful if that new symmetry can be re-imagined as a powerful counterpoints, a creative tension which recognises the value in both emergent systems and bureaucracies with long-term responsibilities and coherent decision-making.

Yet with passive citizens that asymmetry of power is likely to remain intact; if not made worse, as citizens devolve their decision-making and responsibility to software , as well as city government. Their awareness of their environment diminishes in line with their ability to do something about it. While those promoting smart buildings clearly mean to Do The Right Thing, the subconscious focus on what technology can do, as opposed to what it should do, could be entirely counter-productive.

Passive citizens 2: Shanghai Expo’s urban control rooms

The 2010 Shanghai Expo gave us numerous insights into the state of contemporary urbanism, not all of them good. Several of the more intriguing aspects were not to be found in obvious locations, like the glamorous “architecture as soft power” national pavilions, but instead in the massive, banal spaces constructed for corporations to convey their visions of the Expo’s theme “Better City, Better Life.”

These giant sheds were occupied by the likes of General Motors, Cisco, Broad, China State Shipbuilding Corporation and others. Within one such hangar, General Motors was showing a science-fiction movie about future Asian cities in which cars are the organising principle, projected in a vast movie theatre with moving rollercoaster seats.

Unsurprisingly, the IT corporations preferred to see IT as central to the future of the city. While Cisco's movie had a strikingly similar plotline and mis-en-scene to that of General Motors , IT is a little harder to make a rollercoaster ride around, “The Social Network” notwithstanding. So the centrepiece of Cisco's pavilion was a mocked-up "urban control centre", a "NASA Mission Control"-like environment but for urban processes. Cisco staff were dressed up in lab-coats, pretending to operate screens with no connections, as if they were a urban physicians, carefully nurturing and treating the city, massaging it into a safe, secure, efficient condition. Well-meaning, but ultimately a little like the main street in an old Western; all facade.

Wandering around these various prototypes at the Shanghai Expo in 2010, there are clearly uneasy tensions in the philosophical foundations of such an enterprise. Even given the context of an Expo in the Peoples’ Republic, the conceit of centralised control of a city felt a little awkward. Mercantile, chaotic, heterogenous Shanghai would surely resist this as much as anywhere.

This control room or dashboard metaphor, common to most smart city visions, seems hopelessly inappropriate for cities, even if we focus on the "urban systems” that a city government might ostensibly run. As Saskia Sassen points out, there is a further tendency to “make these technologies invisible, and hence put them in command rather than in dialogue with users.”

The users, in fact, were also invisible. The nearest you got were the fictional narratives threaded through such pavilions, all essentially variants on Chinese soap-opera archetypes. So, equally a confection, rather than the glorious unpredictability of real life.

It betrays a technocratic view that the city is something we might understand in detail, if only we had enough data—like an engine or a nuclear power station—and thus master it through the brute force science and engineering. To dig into the shortcomings of that approach, philosophically, would be a book in its own right. And probably one already written by Callon or Latour, so fortunately I don’t have to. Not that I could.

It reminds me of the first part of Richard Wilbur’s poem “Epistemology” …

“Kick at the rock, Sam Johnson, break your bones: But cloudy, cloudy is the stuff of stones.”

The city is certainly cloudy, and that is its immense strength. The reason it works, in fact. That’s what continually beguiles and seduces, such that the story of humanity is essentially the story of cities, a slow reveal on a decision: of people choosing the city, over 20,000 years. The entire premise, and promise, of the urban control room is flawed in this sense— we can no more understand Shanghai through that data than we can from the sense data gathered from a long walk through the city on a sultry June afternoon. The focus on the former over the latter, as if it is a quantifiably “better” way of understanding the city, and thus managing it, generates another slew of unasked questions about the way we run cities.

The centralised approach to city-making, and city-running, that it implies could simply be the latest incarnation of the same sensibility that brought us the suffocating, oil-dependent latticework of suburbs, malls and flyovers of the mid-20 th century city, one of the more unhelpful cul-de-sacs in human history.

Passive citizens 3: Songdo, we have a problem

Well beyond the Expo’s smoke and mirrors, yet still in the East, New Songdo City rises from the wetlands outside Seoul and Incheon. It’s the clearest living example of the ideas glimpsed in that faux-urban control room in Shanghai.

At the International New Towns conference in Rotterdam, "New Towns, New Territories", earlier this year, the Songdo project is being discussed as an exemplar of the smart cities movement. (The other case studies are not so obviously "smart"—Lavasa in India, Strand East in London—although the other, PlanIT Valley in Portugal, is the work of a vocal contingent from Living PlanIT, a start-up who are trying to deploy "tech start-up" culture and the principles of contemporary operating systems onto the city.)

Some approximation of “an operating system for the city” is being deployed there, by Cisco and others, as part of the development phase, and in broadly holistic, top-down fashion. (In fact, Cisco’s more interesting projects, perhaps in a later, more considered mode, are smaller scale discrete experiments in Amsterdam, New York, Barcelona and Nice, which integrate over time. Equally, the really interesting people at Cisco are in their IBSG group: the likes of Nic Villa, Martin Stewart-Weeks, Dimitri Zhengelis et al.)

To see one aspect of the problem with Songdo, let’s zoom into the apartments, sitting in their over-scaled towers surrounded by over-scaled roads.(It’s easy to critique Songdo from an architectural or urbanist standpoint—shooting fish in a barrel with a gatling gun, in fact—but let’s not bother to do that.)

When reviewing the promotional literature, we read Stan Gale suggesting that equipping the buildings with pervasive Telepresence videoconferencing might "take anxiety out of where do I meet, need to be?"

Sorry, but is this a problem? Who gets anxious about this? Meeting different people in different places is one of the joys of urban living, one of its clear advantages. A good city is replete with a variety of spaces and scenarios in which to conduct a business meeting, run a workshop, chat through a idea, share your problems, read a book, have an affair, or simply create chance encounters. The idea that dealing with physical space and finite time is problematic might actually reveal a deeper issue that a particular culture has with these "constraints" on humanity, a kind of machine thinking. It describes a desire to control experience, obliterating serendipity. It would subdue the city’s ability to generate encounter with the other, which as Sennett and others have pointed out, is perhaps the great “civilising” condition of cities.

Cisco’s Telepresence is currently best in class videoconferencing, and fairly astonishing quality—I am always amazed when I use it—but it is an entirely neutered experience compared to meeting in person. In 1976, Antony Jay wrote the classic business text "How To Run A Meeting" , noting:

"From time to time, some technomaniac or other comes up with a vision of an executive who never leaves his home, who controls his whole operation from an all-electronic, multichannel, microwave, fiber-optic video display dream console in his living room. But any manager who has ever had to make an organisation work greets this vision with a smile that soon stretches to a yawn."

This vision is now here—you see it whenever Stan Gale, or one of his execs, addresses a conference from their apartment at Songdo—but you get the sense this vision is still being greeted with smiles and yawns, and rightly so. David Brooks' "The Social Animal" recently deployed the benefit of another four decades' worth of psychology and sociology research since Jay's essay to underscore the importance of face-to-face physical interaction.

For Gale and others, the physical matter of the city might be a problem to be solved through data transfer, perhaps a reflection on the semi-privatised urban culture they emerge from, but might it be the case that for most people, the physical matter of the city is not only its raison d'etre, but part of its appeal, an everyday luxury, an adventure without end? Matter matters.

That cloudy, cloudy condition of stone is preferable to the limited affordances and experiences of the cloud. But don’t read this as a paean to a pre-digital city, or a traditional architect’s plea for the physical qualities of ancient materials—what Gale et al don’t understand is that we can now revel in both—the cloudy and the cloud—at the same time, in a real street.

Moreover, we can use this example of installing pervasive Telepresence to unpick another error at Songdo; a lack of understanding of, or allowance for, the different layers of change regarding domestic technology in domestic spaces.

Put simply, domestic or personal technology now tends to move extremely rapidly, whereas the fabric of domestic and personal spaces does not. While Cisco and Gale might state that "building a city and deploying tech at same time is more efficient", this is from the builder's perspective, and will leave the users of the space with a potential problem when they try to unravel these layers at a later date.

In other words, what happens when someone wants to uninstall the Telepresence in their apartment and use Facetime or Skype instead? Or Microsoft Surface or Google Android? The average citizen would not think of uninstalling their building’s drainage systems, but installing and uninstalling software is now an everyday activity. It's sometimes an unfortunate reality, but a new iPad emerges every six months. New apps emerge every day. Literally hardwiring urban services to a particular device, a particular operating system, is a recipe for disaster, not efficiency. It betrays a lack of understanding of people all too common to large IT equipment manufacturers and property developers. (It's worth noting that the representative of Ikea's property development division, working on Strand East, spoke in markedly different ways to other property developers in the room at the INTI conference, or elsewhere in the industry for that matter. If ever an industry was ripe for "radical disruption" from outside, it's this one.)

Put simply, city fabric changes slowly yet technology changes rapidly. The key, which we can draw from Stewart Brand’s “How Buildings Learn” and other texts , is to enable these layers to move naturally at their different rates. All new cities are somewhat interesting at his early stage, but they are more interesting over time, as they adapt, just as all cities are. There is a worrying lack of thought about adaptation in this desire to install the consumer tech layer as if it were core building services.

There are numerous issues with the vision, beyond these somewhat telling examples. Another was evident in the perceptible shiver that ran through the audience when they were told that the in-apartment systems would enable a parent to track the location of their child, to ensure that they have entered the private school at Songdo. For an extra few bucks a month, that is. This is an anxiety-generating feature, a baby monitor applied to grown children and adults, that would rent asunder delicate social fabric rather than help create it.

Zooming out of that Songdo apartment, we might observe a Cisco exec at the conference noting that their company’s value is directly linked to the volume of internet traffic, and that building a city like Songdo, networked to the hilt, should increase that traffic. This has, inadvertent I’m sure, echoes of that earlier era of technology-led urbanism, when companies like General Motors would allegedly covertly coerce a city like Los Angeles to remove its tramway—the largest streetcar network in the world at that point—whilst lobbying for freeways and roadbuilding on a vast scale as part of an economic shift towards cars. The contemporary Los Angeles is now faced with a near-impossible task of unpicking these decisions.

Infrastructure companies, whether cars and highways or screens and routers, look to increase traffic on their infrastructure. It is in their interest. We can hardly blame them for trying—that’s their job—but we should not so blithely and carelessly let it drive urban strategy as it did 50 years ago.

The landscape architect Richard Weller describes the Australian versions of this outcome as “the cities that cars built when we weren’t looking”. I know what he means, but the problem is that we were looking.

Question: Unproductive efficiency versus productive inefficiency?

So both approaches—the smart city and the city that cars built when we weren’t looking—are driven by a desire for centralised control in order to produce “efficiency”, and focused on second order outcomes: energy, buildings, infrastructure, mobility. These are not the starting points for cities—let’s say culture, commerce, community, conviviality—all of which are intrinsically inefficient, or at least tangential to the idea of efficiency.

When it comes to obsessing over efficiency, we have a bit of previous history here. Have another look at a book like Brian Richards’ “New Movement in Cities” , from 1966 ( mentioned here previously ). It’s actually a sharp, intelligent, forward-thinking book, featuring diagrams by Warren Chalk and Dennis Crompton of Archigram, and with a relatively strong dose of humane urbanism, but it is soaked in the technocratic stance of the time. It might purport to be solving problems for citizens, yet citizens barely feature. In a short passage on getting projects done, Richards describes the necessary players involved in decision-making, and citizens are conspicuous by their absence, amidst the engineers, planners, architects and occasionally politicians.

Throughout the text, Richards describes the likelihood that traffic congestion will be a problem for cities in the future, then summarises a range of possible technology-led mobility solutions, generally based around building new infrastructure. Yet while his more outlandish suggestions—ranging from moving pedestrian walkways to motorways through London’s Soho to hovercrafts—did not happen, the more commonplace solution of engineering traffic to optimise and “solve” traffic would get enacted, and this is what would later be found to be highly flawed. You can look through any number of lenses—air quality, carbon, conviviality, aesthetics, productivity, safety, fatalities, stress, land value and so on—and see that the outcome of this technology-led mindset was highly damaging for our cities, and our citizens. (Some of his later predictions, such as driverless cars and automated roads are only now being deployed.)

“New Movement in Cities” , in focusing almost entirely on mobility, this second-order aspect of cities, eventually reveals an emphasis on unproductive efficiency rather than productive ineffeciency.

And of course beyond mobility, the same approach would be played out more broadly in architecture, planning and bureaucracy, throughout the numerous new town projects of the post-war era.

Decades later, smart cities have exactly the same problem. How could we develop a vocabulary, a dialogue, about how how a city could be inefficient and yet be productive, delightful and engaging? Or how inefficiency is at the heart of human communities and endeavours? Would one wish one’s marriage to be "efficient"? A dinner with friends to be efficient? A game of football? A great book? A walk in the park? On some occasions, perhaps, but it is hardly the point.

How might we avoid making the same errors, in focusing on second-order drivers, in deploying technology-led “solutions”, in trying to optimise the city, in suggesting that efficiency should be something we aspire to? Are we destined for urban planning history to repeat itself, first as tragedy, and second as tragedy as well?

Question: Just what is it about today’s ecosystems that makes them so appealing?

Partly due to privacy fears, but perhaps also due to a more general discomfort with engaging the messiness of humans, smart cities tend to sense objects not people, infrastructure not culture. While the drive behind monitoring infrastructure is understandable, could it be that it inadvertently generates a less human-centred approach to urban governance? You manage what you measure, after all.

This would be the last thing we need. It’s not that we shouldn’t manage the infrastructure using these new tools; it’s just that we need an equal and opposite effort in terms of understanding and engaging with new patterns of living—not simply patterns of movement, or of resources, but with urban culture, with people.

Even then, the idea that we can produce a harmonious equilibrium in urban systems through systems thinking may be fundamentally flawed. These technologies are not necessarily neutral, of course, in that they often betray the cultural conditions they have been created. There are particular dynamics to both social media and crowdsourcing/funding, which we must be aware of if we are to deploy them as a part of our interface with government, the city, or the neighbourhood.

The filmmaker Adam Curtis , in "All Watched Over By Machines Of Loving Grace" , powerfully connected the machine logic of the internet to a form of “neoliberal” ideology, based on a belief in self-righting automated systems and markets. Curtis took apart the idea that “natural ecosystems”, the biological constructs partly underpinning this philosophy, inherently tend towards harmonious equilibrium. In fact, both markets and natural systems are apparently riven with ruptures, waste, inefficiencies and conflict. Thus the idea of feedback loops, common to many smart cities projects, may well be hopelessly insufficient in terms of reversing our carbon-intensive patterns of living, for instance.

Cities, like actual natural ecosystems, are not steady state systems; as capital generators, they tend towards disequilibrium, they move in violent ruptures, they are wasteful, just as nature is. Their progress tends to be produced through cascades of tumbling imbalances, constantly resisting a steady-state. But this is precisely why they work, and why they attract people. It might be worthwhile pondering why that is, and working with the grain rather than against it.

Instead, however, smart cities tend to run counter to the conditions of urban culture, just as traditional software models struggle to comprehend and mimic the complexity of a savannah. When software does achieve that complexity, which it increasingly can, it moves beyond human comprehension. As Kevin Slavin has said of trading software, we are now writing code that we cannot read. Here, the machine thinking that often underpins sustainable city visions could be seen as the equivalent of a kind of "high-frequency trading for urban processes" . as well as an overly simplistic reading of ecosystems.

Is this really the condition we want in our cities as well?

It is still early days, yet the success of social media means that it is being thoroughly critiqued. As a result, we have to be aware that it may be exemplifying characteristics that are in direct conflict with the idea of a "new toolkit for 21st century urban democracy" or “the sustainable city”.

For NYU/Harvard Law School researcher Alice Marwick , social media implicitly and explicitly encourages what she calls “status seeking behaviour” within a “competitive attention economy”. Her critical research describes the effects of transposing a Silicon Valley-derived model of neoliberal, free market principles onto our social organisation, our relationships with our self, and each other. What happens when we deploy this ideology in the cities of, say, Northern Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Asian Sub-Continent, Latin America, the Far East? Each has a completely different set of preferential social structures, governance structures, living and working patterns, cultures of decision making.

But let's assume, just for a moment, that this airdrop of transposed culture via software may be harmless, in terms of these wider cultural effects. But Marwick’s key point—the creation of the selfish, “attention economy”—cannot be ignored in the context of urban culture, and particularly sustainable urban culture. Even the proponents of social media talk of the “attention economy” as if it is just ipso facto a natural state of organisation. But at its most basic level, sustainability necessitates a selflessness, a scaling of empathy beyond one’s immediate concerns, a scaling in terms of space, to those immediately affected by our changing of the climate, and time, to those subsequent generations who have to live with the consequences of our actions over the next few years. At the very least, this is surely in tension with “status seeking behaviour” and we need to critically assess how, why and what to do about it.

Similarly, the basic premise of crowd-funding tends to rely, implicitly at least, on the idea that a kind of bottom-up “civic entrepreneurship” should be the primary motor driving urban development. As this is generally in opposition to state-led innovation, this can also be seen as part of a certain kind of ideological backdrop. In the UK, it could be seen as a Big Society -driven abnegation of urban services, in favour of 1000 startups blooming to take care of the city. Crowd-funding becomes a useful substitution for municipal taxes, offering up obvious political opportunities.

So these political aspects of "smart city" thinking could embody both a centralising technocratic dynamic, albeit aligned to increasingly privatised delivery, and a decentralised individualist dynamic, with urban services delivered by a rag-bag of third sector, private sector and diminished public sector, or not at all.

It is clearly of our time, and with such a strategy Your Mileage May Vary, as they say.

Numerous thinkers, from Zadie Smith to Malcolm Gladwell to Douglas Rushkoff, have written of the implicit limits, or even dangers, when we are unthinkingly uncritical of this culture. Equally, many simply don't get it, much as Baroness Susan Greenfield simply doesn't get video games. And for every Gladwell, there's a Clay Shirky or Steven Johnson, thinkers capable of genuinely engaging in constructive critique. You can choose which side of the Shirky vs Gladwell debate you land on, but at least it's happening. Personally I see huge value in well-designed social media, and the cultures it might enable. But there are two issues. The first is that the value might be enabled only when subjected to considered critique, continuous exploration, asking the right questions, and engaging with the outcomes in ongoing, iterative fashion. The second is that you have to do apply all of this to anything social media touches too, such as the city.

We should not let the idea of smart cities continue to be so untroubled by informed, constructive critique.

Suggestion: A prototyping culture, beyond IT

Yet critique or not, there is only one true way to find out what balancing act might tend towards sustainable outcomes, and that is to try it. But as "trying it" means considered, iterative prototyping of user-centred platforms, as local experiments that can nonetheless scale, and produced by designers, coders and product managers that understand both The Network and The City, do we have the right people in place, able to take the right approaches?

Sadly, most city officials have absolutely no idea how to do any of this, with a handful of honourable exceptions. Their culture—and thus their operations, attitude, behaviour, skillset—is from another age. Hence we see the systems integrators of the previous age—let's call it "The Age of IT ”—mercilessly exploiting this condition through anachronistic procurement cultures designed almost exclusively for these players.

The results will be the same as for the Age of IT : over-scaled monolithic vertically integrated systems that take too long to develop, are too expensive to buy and maintain (by orders of magnitude), and have an appalling overhead on anyone that tries to use them. Exactly what image does the phrase “government I.T. project” conjure up, after all? (By way of comparison, observe how the "start-up within the UK Cabinet Office", Government Digital Service , is laying waste to a previous generation of IT systems in a matter of months, creating elegant, simple and user-focused systems using the same agile methodologies and user-centred design that build the likes of Amazon and Twitter, and saving millions upon millions of pounds along the way. You cannot outsource this: it is strategic. We have even more reason to take the same intrinsically internet-age "small pieces, loosely joined" approach to our urban governance systems, given our understanding of the way cities work. But are we?)

This is not about "IT" anymore. A 14 year-old girl updating her Facebook status on her iPhone while she's walking down the street is not really "IT" What we used to call "IT" is now too important for the "IT" department. These technologies are part of cultural and strategic approaches, and have long since shifted from the back room to front of house, to the top table.

Observe how Amazon and Net-A-Porter are changing the physical fabric of the high street; how Nike+ is changing how we exercise; how Kickstarter is changing the structure of the creative industries; how Apple has changed media; how Google is altering basic literacy, almost extending cognition; how Facebook and Twitter helped drive last years' Peak News events.

Compare to your average municipality’s IT department: do we have the right people, the right culture, around the decision-making table?

We can now easily see the problem when city governments attempt to engage with this. Trained by pervasive, professionally-produced experiences like Facebook, citizens can now see that almost all the efforts of municipalities thus far are embarrassingly bad in comparison. Politicians can see this too, as we all now use these systems. The issue is with people and culture, not the role of government itself. it’s not that they can’t do it; it’s that they can’t do it . They literally do not know how to. They are currently not equipped to work in this way, with these tools, skillsets and attitudes. They need to build a culture of doing, rather than outsourcing, but most do not yet realise that they now have competition. The UK’s Cabinet Office appear to understand that now, and perhaps a few municipalities like New York and Chicago, but they are an exception, and even in the best cases have not reacted enough.

IT was once a service like catering or postage, to be procured. IT, or what replaced iT, is now at the core of almost everything. It is becoming the medium for a government’s relationship with their citizens. The systems and cultures that municipalities are looking to take advantage of are not outsourced, they are not put together by “systems integrators”, they are not IT. They are quite different. The platforms of Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon are not outsourced; they are owned and operated, designed and researched, coded and maintained, communicated and supported, almost entirely in-house.

Suggestion: Active city government

Yet there is no fundamental reason why municipalities could not work in this way, in terms of its strategic positioning, function, history. It is a question of talent, which in turn is a question of motivation. There are plenty of examples of innovation within a public sector environment. From a tiny sliver of personal perspective alone, I can speak of GDS above, or the BBC ten years earlier. You cannot tell me that those core public sector environments were not "innovative" . Beyond that, Sitra's recent Helsinki Design Lab event was set up to explore further examples, from IDEO’s work with the US Government to Mindlab’s at the heart of the Danish government.

Yet you do not hear enough about them as it runs counter to contemporary political thinking, much contemporary economic thinking, and they can also easily be outweighed by the number of counter-examples (as I just did in the previous section.) They illustrate, however, that it is entirely possible, it is going on, and thus there are no structural reasons why it should not happen. Such good work, in a public sector environment, is usually not in opposition to the idea of innovation in the private sector—often, the people involved have significant experience of both sectors, and tend to blur the boundaries between them, driven instead by “the mission” in either case (a discussion for another day.)

We need to hear more about such examples of public sector innovation , however, as Western culture is soaked in a form of propaganda suggesting that public sector is slow, big, cumbersome and entirely devoid of innovation. This is genuinely damaging.

If you want to get things done, do you turn to government as your potential employer? Not at the moment, not often enough. Yet what if government was directly and boldly prototyping new versions of itself, using these new technologies? It might be that a sense of public good, of civic responsibility, can be found within a re-calibrated approach to municipal government. If we dovetail active citizens with active governments, building the interactions of both around these new logics but balancing their inherent biases, we might discover better cultures for producing good, sustainable decisions.

As Marco Steinberg says, we currently have 18th century institutions facing 21st century problems. Contemporary municipal governments are entirely redolent of their 18th or 19th century counterparts, despite some facile difference. Drop an employee from, say, 1890s Helsinki city council into their 2012 equivalent and they'd recognise much of what they saw. Some of the clothes might be different, there would presumably be more women around, and they might wonder about those small glowing rectangles people keep looking at, but they'd see a department of planning, a city engineer, a schools department and so on, run in largely similar ways (although arguably rather more risk averse).

Yet we are in a radically different urban condition. Not just in terms of built fabric, whose significance is overplayed due to its sheer obviousness, but in terms of our highly interconnected patterns of living amidst the radically different systems that produce the contemporary city, localised and globalised simultaneously. The nature of our challenges are entirely different, with climate change the clearest example of that.

Even accepting that cities evolve—and slowly—urban sustainability will require a transformation. To produce transformative products or services, you must transform organisations. So you must to redesign the city’s organisations, recalling Peter Drucker’s insight that “culture eats strategy for breakfast”, in order to be able to redesign the city. If we want the city to produce a different outcome, it will take a different kind of organisation running it, responsible for it.

The very idea of the city as a public good fundamentally rests on this. And the very idea of the sustainable city relies on understanding that the city is a public good.

Possibility: NIMBY to YIMBY

There is genuine possibility in the new tools, after all. Several of the emerging crowdfunding projects indicate that they might be able to generate significant funds, certainly enough to build serious funding at the start of projects, which is often when they fail, alongside mechanisms for otherwise backing, discussing or sharing best practice.

City halls rarely have a meaningful “suggestions box” on the front door, and these new platforms could be just that. They might reverse a Not-In-My-Backyard (NIMBY) tendency such that it becomes a YIMBY—Yes In My Backyard!—through genuine collaboration and participation in city-making, rather than the dread-word “consultation”.

Few urban interventions currently leave traces of their progress for others to follow, copy, learn from. The internet is built to do that, meaning that you might be able to “view source” for every urban project. Urban activism is usually the province of someone who wants to give up every weekend for years, just to get something done, learning from scratch in each instance as there are no breadcrumb trails to follow from previous projects. With new platforms deployed, activism might become something more akin to plain old urban activity, in which many if not all citizens are more deeply woven into the fabric of their city’s decision-making. Entirely new governance models are implied as a result, with far more frequent, open and active engagement than a vote in the municipal elections every four years . There are different responsibilities both sides here.

Practically and technically, you can read the settling patterns in social media platforms as a blueprint for what a 21 st century “social service” might be, whilst also deriving some of the changes in institutional cultures required. And the mode of production in prototyping—starting small, pivoting and scaling, as all contemporary systems do—suggests how we might build. ( Brickstarter was a manifestation of this thought.)

For if sustainability fundamentally requires us to think long-term, and with the welfare of others in mind, we must surely create decision-making cultures that not only take into account but actively counter the tendencies of these swirling vortices of individualism and short-termism. If, after Eliel Saarinen, we need to think of our house in terms of the neighbourhood, of the neighbourhood within the city, of the city symbiotically connected to its wider region, and so on, we will have to actively build systems with this in mind. Like judo, we might need to use the powerful dynamics of social media against itself . Otherwise these forces pulling in opposite directions may cause the system to shear itself apart.

In which case, what possible models for cooperative urban governance might emerge from such a culture? Do we need a city in which citizens understand that they are part of a wider system, and behave accordingly, to take a more holistic view beyond individual drivers, to be actively engaged rather than passively observed and “fed back to", with governments equally engaged as collaborative actors rather than passive procurers? What is the equivalent of Monderman's dynamic, responsible “shared space” system?

We do need smarter cities

These are questions we cannot fully answer yet, but we should ask them nonetheless.

Yet beyond governance, it’s also clear that much of our existing urban infrastructure is indeed broken . It is, in comparison to "smart", mostly dumb. The way we procure, develop and construct buildings is well past its "use by" date, and construction, as an industry, is so cumbersome as to be largely ineffective. The way we run our cities tends to be pathetically anachronistic, largely oriented for the 19 th century rather than the 21 st . Bureacracies cannot seem to scale empathy and engagement, and often seem unable to turn strategy into delivery. The strategic drivers for decision-making about patterns of living and working are either non-existent or not understood. Our shared civic culture is being allowed to atrophy in the face of a powerful hegemony reinforcing a sophisticated individualism as its organising principle .

And we do need to deploy the clear promise of technology into our cities, using a "post-IT" culture to unlock its immense potential to address some of these issues. I, and many others, have written enough about the promise of the smart city in this respect elsewhere—we don't need to go into it here. There are clear benefits to a more contemporary urban infrastructure—in efficiency, yes, but also in firmness, commodity, delight .

But as well as a new urban hardware and software, it’s in this interface between engaged citizens and engaged government that its real promise may lie, as evidenced by the way that citizens are racing ahead while the smart cities movement lags behind. This medium, as long as it does not put technology in the driving seat, might be immensely useful in terms of introducing genuine efficacy and verve into the way the public sector works, reducing the cost of government massively whilst increasing its positive impact, rebuilding an meaningful civic interface with citizens.

Looking at these emerging patterns described above, we can read a sketch full of promise, indicating the value in an active, engaged government and active, engaged citizens . It will not be enough to have emergent communities without a transformed attitude within bureacracy, just as the Gov2.0 movement has to be more than a Web2.0 front-end plastered over Gov1.0.

The challenge with smart cities, just as with most aspects of cities, is in our various cultures of decision-making. Steven Johnson's latest book "Future Perfect" , on what he calls "peer progressive" political systems that are built with The Network in mind also provides a useful primer on the emerging thinking here. Similarly, see also the “hybrid forum” approach being pioneered by architects Elemental and strategic communications firm Tironi in Chile . There, new collaboration methods are transforming the practice of masterplanning, architecture and civic engagement. They are radical in comparison to today's approaches yet seem entirely common-sense when you dig deeper. We might learn a a lot.

In order to unlock the potential of technology in the city, we must explore a wider frame of reference than that offered by IT corporations and property developers, where a tangle of vested interest and path dependency can only give us neutered, potentially damaging and ironically rather outdated ideas. Let's be careful not to make the same mistakes we made 50 years ago, which we are still paying for, and still making.

Closing questions: the city as public good

Finally, yet more questions.

Might we enable patterns of living that recognise that cities, as the richest expression of the diversity and dynamism of human culture, thrive on the very unpredictability and inefficiency of citizens, that the city is in itself a form of resistance to steady state systems and refuses to settle on “natural equilibriums”, that it can nonetheless be guided and shaped by shared governance cultures based on its incompleteness, openness and sense of possibility, and recognition that it is a process, not an accretion of infrastructure?

Do we have smart citizens at the core of our smart cities? Are our governance cultures and tools in the right shape to genuinely react to the promise of The Network?

Are we sure that these ideas—drivers and enablers, unpredictability and inefficiency, prototyping and pivoting, personal and civic responsibility, meaningful activity from citizens and government, the city as public good—are part of the smart city vision?

For these are all part of what makes a city work, what makes a good city, and what will make a genuinely resilient city.

Understanding that might be a smart thing to do.

Small vehicles of Tokyo

Agencies to work in the gaps, and holding up questions in public: the arkdes case, two recent interviews on designing for technology and the city.

City of Sound . Written by Dan Hill since 2001.

More at Medium .

Designed with WordPress

Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Subscribe Subscribed
Copy shortlink
Report this content
View post in Reader
Manage subscriptions
Collapse this bar

IMAGES

Essay on Smart City
Essay on Smart City
Essay on Smart City in India
Essay on Smart City
Essay On Smart City
Write a short essay on Smart City

COMMENTS

Smart City Essay for Students and Children in English
February 13, 2024 by Prasanna. Essay on Smart City: Smart cities are defined as the concept of rapid urbanization and its contribution to the development and improvement of socio-economic activities of the society. The idea of smart cities requires some specific elements and highlights some models of implemented smart solutions in the world.
Essay on Smart City
Key Components of a Smart City. Smart cities are built on a foundation of key components that work together to create a cohesive, efficient, and sustainable urban environment. These include: 1. Smart Energy: Smart grids, renewable energy resources, and advanced metering technologies ensure efficient use of energy. 2.
Essay on Smart City
Essay on Smart City in 10 Lines - Examples. 1. A smart city is a city that uses technology and data to improve the quality of life for its residents. 2. Smart cities use sensors, cameras, and other devices to collect data on things like traffic flow, air quality, and energy usage. 3.
Speech on Smart City
Essay on Smart City; ... Imagine a city where life is easy, where everything works smoothly, like a well-oiled machine. A city that thinks and acts on its own, making life better for all its residents. This is the vision of a Smart City. A Smart City doesn't just mean more technology or shiny new buildings. It means a city that uses ...
Smart Cities
Residents and city workers, in turn, may be provided with apps that allow them to access city services, receive and issue reports of outages, accidents, and crimes, pay taxes, fees, and the like. In the smart city, energy efficiency and sustainability are emphasized. A variety of "smart transportation" systems can be implemented in a smart ...
Smart Cities As Sustainable Cities: A Visual Essay
"A blueprint for city transformation," Connected Urban Development ‍ The Connected Urban Development (CUD) initiative, formed through a partnership between Cisco and the Clinton Initiative, with MIT and the Connected Sustainable Cities project (CSC) joining the project as it progressed, is a clear example of smart cities developing into sustainable city initiatives, where sustainability ...
Smart City
Some of the key functionalities found in such a city include the following: Promoting economic growth. Giving the citizens a "smart" living environment. Being highly operational and efficient. Improving the overall quality of life of the citizens. In the modern world, there is a lot of importance of smart cities as it introduces a new way ...
What are smart cities?. Digitally enhanced city concepts that…
This essay breaks down the components of a modern city to develop a definition for what makes a city "smart" and lists key challenges with updating city infrastructure to live up to the hype ...
Essay on Smart City in India
Essay on Smart City in India: The movement of Smart City in India was introduced by our Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has a plan and a vision to build 100 smart cities in the country. Smart Cities are similar to ordinary cities but equipped with more advanced technologies and more transportation facilities along with a high rate of educated population with better sanitation and health ...
Essay on Smart City in India
Smart City mission, an imaginative and new activity by India's public authority, will drive financial development and improve individuals' satisfaction. Smart City mission, is a metropolitan reestablishment and retrofitting program by the public authority of India. FAQ's on Smart City in India Essay. Question 1. What is the smart city ...
What is a 'smart city'?
At the World Bank's Global Smart City Partnership Program, we held a Virtual Knowledge Exchange Program on Smart Cities for Sustainable Development, jointly organized with the World Bank's Open Learning Campus, to discuss the trend.At the event, we polled more than 260 participants from around the world to find out what they thought a smart city would be, what makes a urban area and its ...
Thinking about becoming a smart city? 10 benefits of smart cities
Smart cities that leverage connected technology across their operations reap a host of benefits. From our extensive research and work helping cities develop technology plans, here are 10 benefits we see cities derive from smart technologies every day: 1. More effective, data-driven decision-making.
The "Smart City" Concept
The major "smarter city" projects in Dubuque are as follows: "smarter water, smarter electric, smarter gas," and "smarter travel.". Within the "smarter water" project, the citizens of Dubuque received the opportunity to control the process of water consumption in their households. The impact of the program was the statistical ...
Smart city
A smart city is a technologically advanced urban area that uses different types of electronic methods and sensors to collect specific data.Information gained from that data is used to manage assets, resources and services efficiently; in return, that data is used to improve operations across the city. [1] This includes data collected from citizens, devices, buildings and assets that is ...
Value, Benefits and Challenges of Smart Cities
Conclusively the safety of the people staying in the smart city in the most vital and basic factor in growth of the smart city which also raise up the cost of design and operation (Shapiro, J. M., 2006). The Internet of Things (IoT) in Smart Cities: The infrastructure of the smart city is based on the development of Internet of Things (IoT).
Smart cities concept: [Essay Example], 427 words GradesFixer
Get original essay. Smart cities can be viewed as sustainable, inclusive and prosperous greener cities that promote a human-centric approach, fostering enabling smart information and communication technologies such as internet of things, cloud computing and big data and utilizing smart devices capable of sensing and communicating, such as ...
Introduction to Smart Cities
A smart city uses information and communications technology (ICT) to enhance its liveability, workability and sustainability. First, a smart city collects information about itself through sensors, other devices and existing systems. Next, it communicates that data using wired or wireless networks.
Essay On Smart City
Essay on Smart City - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document discusses the author's vision for transforming Faridabad, Haryana, India into a "liveable" and "smart" city. The author notes some current issues like poor infrastructure, illiteracy, and cleanliness that need to be addressed. She provides suggestions like improving roads, boosting ...
Essay On Smart City
Essay on Smart City - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document provides an overview of smart cities in India. It discusses key points about the Smart City Mission launched in 2015 to develop 100 smart cities over five years. The objective is to provide core infrastructure and improve quality of life.
The Promise of Smart Cities
The concept of smart cities is often seen as the glittering solution to many of the world's urban development challenges. But 'smartness' is not solely about the technology or efficiency of systems. ... In this photo essay, the Innovation Hub's Knowledge Immersion Program demonstrates how digital solutions support sustainable tourism ...
How to achieve sustainable development of smart city: a ...
Since its inception, the smart city concept has received much attention (Su and Fan 2023), but there is still no clear definition (Zeng and Li 2022).Smart cities represent a multidisciplinary field constantly influenced by technological advances and city development (Angelidou 2015; Hussain et al. 2023a, b).Its origins can be traced back to the Smart Growth Movement of the late 1990s, when ...
Essay: On the smart city; Or, a 'manifesto' for smart citizens instead
Of choosing the city. The smart city vision, however, is focused on these second order outcomes, and often with one overriding motivation: efficiency. Yet the city's primary raison d'être is to be found amidst its citizens. If we look there, we find that there is more, much more, to urban life than efficiency.
The Smart Cities Concept Information Technology Essay
SMART CITIES CONCEPT. The concept of the smart city has been introduced to highlight the importance of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in the last 20 years (Schaffers, 2012). In literature the term smart city is used to specify a city's ability to respond as promptly as possible to the needs of citizens.

Essay on Smart City – Examples, 10 Lines to 1200 Words

Smart City Essay Writing Tips

Essay on Smart City in 10 Lines – Examples

Sample Essay on Smart City in 100-180 Words

Short Essay on Smart City in 200-500 Words

Essay on Smart City in 1000-1500 Words

Related Essays

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Speech on Smart City

1-minute Speech on Smart City

2-minute Speech on Smart City

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Smart Cities

Microgrid Gas Meter

Media Credits

Production Managers

User Permissions

Interactives

Related Resources

Book Reviews

Refusing Police Power: Resistances and Ambivalences to State Violence

Book Review Forum

On Containers and Conjunctures at People’s Park

Violent Inheritance Book Review

Phenom Penh's Bassac District: Genealogy of Bassac Review

Liberation, Solidarity, Abundance: Envisioning Hawaiʻi Beyond the GMO Present

Society and Space statement and virtual issue on Palestine and Israel

Free to Access Society and Space Journal Articles

Current Issue

February 11, 2014

related magazine articles

They Eat Our Sweat Review

Planning for Humane Urbanism Through Solidarity and Radical Care

Review, Citizen Designs, by Eli Elinoff

Lebanese Yawmiyat (diaries): Archiving unfinished stories of spatial violence

related journal articles

Planning context: Flexible plans and mayoral authority in French urban planning

Counterfactual future-thinking

Book Review Forums

What’s a Rich Text element?

Static and dynamic content editing

How to customize formatting for each rich text

Essay on Smart City in India | Smart City in India Essay for Students and Children in English

Long and Short Essays on Smart City in India for Students and Kids in English

Long Essay on Smart City in India 500 Words in English

Short Essay on Smart City in India 150 Words in English

10 Lines on Smart City in India Essay in English

FAQ’s on Smart City in India Essay

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Essay on Smart City in India | Smart City in India Essay for Students and Children in English

Long and Short Essays on Smart City in India for Students and Kids in English

Long Essay on Smart City in India 500 Words in English

Short Essay on Smart City in India 150 Words In English

10 Lines on Essay on Smart City in India

FAQ’s on Smart City in India Essay

The “Smart City” Concept Essay

Recommendations

Smart Cities Concept

Cite this Essay

Related Essays

Still can’t find what you need?

Related Topics

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

Introduction to Smart Cities

Related Articles

ADB is committed to achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific, while sustaining its efforts to eradicate extreme poverty.

ORGANIZATION

ACCOUNTABILITY

Strategy 2030: Operational Priorities

ABOUT ADB PROJECTS

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

REGIONAL OFFICES

LIAISON OFFICES

SUBREGIONAL PROGRAMS

With employees from more than 60 countries, ADB is a place of real diversity.

FOR INVESTORS

INFORMATION ON WORKING WITH ADB FOR...

PROCUREMENT AND OUTREACH

The Promise of Smart Cities

Latest Photo Essays