problem based learning literature review

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Med Sci Educ
• v.31(3); 2021 Jun

Effective Learning Behavior in Problem-Based Learning: a Scoping Review

Azril shahreez abdul ghani.

1 Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Kulliyah of Medicine, Bandar Indera Mahkota Campus, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, 25200 Pahang Malaysia

2 Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, 16150 Kelantan Malaysia

Ahmad Fuad Abdul Rahim

Muhamad saiful bahri yusoff, siti nurma hanim hadie.

3 Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, 16150 Kota Bharu, Kelantan Malaysia

Problem-based learning (PBL) emphasizes learning behavior that leads to critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and collaborative skills in preparing students for a professional medical career. However, learning behavior that develops these skills has not been systematically described. This review aimed to unearth the elements of effective learning behavior in a PBL context, using the protocol by Arksey and O’Malley. The protocol identified the research question, selected relevant studies, charted and collected data, and collated, summarized, and reported results. We discovered three categories of elements—intrinsic empowerment, entrustment, and functional skills—proven effective in the achievement of learning outcomes in PBL.

Introduction

Problem-based learning (PBL) is an educational approach that utilizes the principles of collaborative learning in small groups, first introduced by McMaster Medical University [ 1 ]. The shift of the higher education curriculum from traditional, lecture-based approaches to an integrated, student-centered approach was triggered by concern over the content-driven nature of medical knowledge with minimal clinical application [ 2 ]. The PBL pedagogy uses a systematic approach, starting with an authentic, real-life problem scenario as a context in which learning is not separated from practice as students collaborate and learn [ 3 ]. The tutor acts as a facilitator who guides the students’ learning, while students are required to solve the problems by discussing them with group members [ 4 ]. The essential aspect of the PBL process is the ability of the students to recognize their current knowledge, determine the gaps in their knowledge and experience, and acquire new knowledge to bridge the gaps [ 5 ]. PBL is a holistic approach that gives students an active role in their learning.

Since its inception, PBL has been used in many undergraduate and postgraduate degree programs, such as medicine [ 6 , 7 ], nursing [ 8 ], social work education [ 9 ], law [ 10 ], architecture [ 11 ], economics [ 12 ], business [ 13 ], science [ 14 ], and engineering [ 15 ]. It has also been applied in elementary and secondary education [ 16 – 18 ]. Despite its many applications, its implementation is based on a single universal workflow framework that contains three elements: problem as the initiator for learning, tutor as a facilitator in the group versions, and group work as a stimulus for collaborative interaction [ 19 ]. However, there are various versions of PBL workflow, such as the seven-step technique based on the Maastricht “seven jumps” process. The tutor’s role is to ensure the achievement of learning objectives and to assess students’ performance [ 20 , 21 ].

The PBL process revolves around four types of learning principles: constructive, self-directed, collaborative, and contextual [ 19 ]. Through the constructive learning process, the students are encouraged to think about what is already known and integrate their prior knowledge with their new understanding. This process helps the student understand the content, form a new opinion, and acquire new knowledge [ 22 ]. The PBL process encourages students to become self-directed learners who plan, monitor, and evaluate their own learning, enabling them to become lifelong learners [ 23 ]. The contextualized collaborative learning process also promotes interaction among students, who share similar responsibilities to achieve common goals relevant to the learning context [ 24 ]. By exchanging ideas and providing feedback during the learning session, the students can attain a greater understanding of the subject matter [ 25 ].

Dolmans et al. [ 19 ] pointed out two issues related to the implementation of PBL: dominant facilitators and dysfunctional PBL groups. These problems inhibit students’ self-directed learning and reduce their satisfaction level with the PBL session. A case study by Eryilmaz [ 26 ] that evaluated engineering students’ and tutors’ experience of PBL discovered that PBL increased the students’ self-confidence and improved essential skills such as problem-solving, communications, critical thinking, and collaboration. Although most of the participants in the study found PBL satisfactory, many complained about the tutor’s poor guidance and lack of preparation. Additionally, it was noted that 64% of the first-year students were unable to adapt to the PBL system because they had been accustomed to conventional learning settings and that 43% of students were not adequately prepared for the sessions and thus were minimally involved in the discussion.

In a case study by Cónsul-giribet [ 27 ], newly graduated nursing professionals reported a lack of perceived theoretical basic science knowledge at the end of their program, despite learning through PBL. The nurses perceived that this lack of knowledge might affect their expertise, identity, and professional image.

Likewise, a study by McKendree [ 28 ] reported the outcomes of a workshop that explored the strengths and weaknesses of PBL in an allied health sciences curriculum in the UK. The workshop found that problems related to PBL were mainly caused by students, the majority of whom came from conventional educational backgrounds either during high school or their first degree. They felt anxious when they were involved in PBL, concerned about “not knowing when to stop” in exploring the learning needs. Apart from a lack of basic science knowledge, the knowledge acquired during PBL sessions remains unorganized [ 29 ]. Hence, tutors must guide students in overcoming this situation by instilling appropriate insights and essential skills for the achievement of the learning outcomes [ 30 ]. It was also evident that the combination of intention and motivation to learn and desirable learning behavior determined the quality of learning outcomes [ 31 , 32 ]. However, effective learning behaviors that help develop these skills have not been systematically described. Thus, this scoping review aimed to unearth the elements of effective learning behavior in the PBL context.

Scoping Review Protocol

This scoping review was performed using a protocol by Arksey and O’Malley [ 33 ]. The protocol comprises five phases: (i) identification of research questions, (ii) identification of relevant articles, (iii) selection of relevant studies, (iv) data collection and charting, and (v) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results.

Identification of Research Questions

This scoping review was designed to unearth the elements of effective learning behavior that can be generated from learning through PBL instruction. The review aimed to answer one research question: “What are the effective learning behavior elements related to PBL?” For the purpose of the review, an operational definition of effective learning behavior was constructed, whereby it was defined as any learning behavior that is related to PBL instruction and has been shown to successfully attain the desired learning outcomes (i.e., cognitive, skill, or affective)—either quantitatively or qualitatively—in any intervention conducted in higher education institutions.

The positive outcome variables include student viewpoint or perception, student learning experience and performance, lecturer viewpoint and expert judgment, and other indirect variables that may be important indicators of successful PBL learning (i.e., attendance to PBL session, participation in PBL activity, number of interactions in PBL activity, and improvement in communication skills in PBL).

Identification of Relevant Articles

An extensive literature search was conducted on articles published in English between 2015 and 2019. Three databases—Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed—were used for the literature search. Seven search terms with the Boolean combination were used, whereby the keywords were identified from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) databases. The search terms were tested and refined with multiple test searches. The final search terms with the Boolean operation were as follows: “problem-based learning” AND (“learning behavior” OR “learning behaviour”) AND (student OR “medical students” OR undergraduate OR “medical education”).

Selection of Relevant Articles

The articles from the three databases were exported manually into Microsoft Excel. The duplicates were removed, and the remaining articles were reviewed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These criteria were tested on titles and abstracts to ensure their robustness in capturing the articles related to learning behavior in PBL. The shortlisted articles were reviewed by two independent researchers, and a consensus was reached either to accept or reject each article based on the set criteria. When a disagreement occurred between the two reviewers, the particular article was re-evaluated independently by the third and fourth researchers (M.S.B.Y and A.F.A.R), who have vast experience in conducting qualitative research. The sets of criteria for selecting abstracts and final articles were developed. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table ​ Table1 1 .

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Data Charting

The selected final articles were reviewed, and several important data were extracted to provide an objective summary of the review. The extracted data were charted in a table, including the (i) title of the article, (ii) author(s), (iii) year of publication, (iv) aim or purpose of the study, (v) study design and method, (iv) intervention performed, and (v) study population and sample size.

Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results

A content analysis was performed to identify the elements of effective learning behaviors in the literature by A.S.A.G and S.N.H.H, who have experience in conducting qualitative studies. The initial step of content analysis was to read the selected articles thoroughly to gain a general understanding of the articles and extract the elements of learning behavior which are available in the articles. Next, the elements of learning behavior that fulfil the inclusion criteria were extracted. The selected elements that were related to each other through their content or context were grouped into subtheme categories. Subsequently, the combinations of several subthemes expressing similar underlying meanings were grouped into themes. Each of the themes and subthemes was given a name, which was operationally defined based on the underlying elements. The selected themes and subthemes were presented to the independent researchers in the team (M.S.B.Y and A.F.A.R), and a consensus was reached either to accept or reformulate each of the themes and subthemes. The flow of the scoping review methods for this study is illustrated in Fig.  1 .

The flow of literature search and article selection

Literature Search

Based on the keyword search, 1750 articles were obtained. Duplicate articles that were not original articles found in different databases and resources were removed. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of title selection, the eligibility of 1750 abstracts was evaluated. The articles that did not fulfil the criteria were removed, leaving 328 articles for abstract screening. A total of 284 articles were screened according to the eligibility criteria for abstract selection. Based on these criteria, 284 articles were selected and screened according to the eligibility criteria for full article selection. Fourteen articles were selected for the final review. The information about these articles is summarized in Table ​ Table2 2 .

Studies characteristics

Study Characteristics

The final 14 articles were published between 2015 and 2019. The majority of the studies were conducted in Western Asian countries ( n  = 4), followed by China ( n  = 3), European countries ( n  = 2), Thailand ( n  = 2), Indonesia ( n  = 1), Singapore ( n  = 1), and South Africa ( n  = 1). Apart from traditional PBL, some studies incorporated other pedagogic modalities into their PBL sessions, such as online learning, blended learning, and gamification. The majority of the studies targeted a single-profession learner group, and one study was performed on mixed interprofessional health education learners.

Results of Thematic Analysis

The thematic analysis yielded three main themes of effective learning behavior: intrinsic empowerment, entrustment, and functional skills. Intrinsic empowerment overlies four proposed subthemes: proactivity, organization, diligence, and resourcefulness. For entrustment, there were four underlying subthemes: students as assessors, students as teachers, feedback-giving, and feedback-receiving. The functional skills theme contains four subthemes: time management, digital proficiency, data management, and collaboration.

Theme 1: Intrinsic Empowerment

Intrinsic empowerment enforces student learning behavior that can facilitate the achievement of learning outcomes. By empowering the development of these behaviors, students can become lifelong learners [ 34 ]. The first element of intrinsic empowerment is proactive behavior. In PBL, the students must be proactive in analyzing problems [ 35 , 36 ] and their learning needs [ 35 , 37 ], and this can be done by integrating prior knowledge and previous experience through a brainstorming session [ 35 , 38 ]. The students must be proactive in seeking guidance to ensure they stay focused and confident [ 39 , 40 ]. Finding ways to integrate content from different disciplines [ 35 , 41 ], formulate new explanations based on known facts [ 34 , 35 , 41 ], and incorporate hands-on activity [ 35 , 39 , 42 ] during a PBL session are also proactive behaviors.

The second element identified is “being organized” which reflects the ability of students to systematically manage their roles [ 43 ], ideas, and learning needs [ 34 ]. The students also need to understand the task for each learning role in PBL, such as chairperson or leader, scribe, recorder, and reflector. This role needs to be assigned appropriately to ensure that all members take part in the discussion [ 43 ]. Similarly, when discussing ideas or learning needs, the students need to follow the steps in the PBL process and organize and prioritize the information to ensure that the issues are discussed systematically and all aspects of the problems are covered accordingly [ 34 , 37 ]. This team organization and systematic thought process is an effective way for students to focus, plan, and finalize their learning tasks.

The third element of intrinsic empowerment is “being diligent.” Students must consistently conduct self-revision [ 40 ] and keep track of their learning plan to ensure the achievement of their learning goal [ 4 , 40 ]. The students must also be responsible for completing any given task and ensuring good understanding prior to their presentation [ 40 ]. Appropriate actions need to be undertaken to find solutions to unsolved problems [ 40 , 44 ]. This effort will help them think critically and apply their knowledge for problem-solving.

The fourth element identified is “being resourceful.” Students should be able to acquire knowledge from different resources, which include external resources (i.e., lecture notes, textbooks, journal articles, audiovisual instructions, the Internet) [ 38 , 40 , 45 ] and internal resources (i.e., students’ prior knowledge or experience) [ 35 , 39 ]. The resources must be evidence-based, and thus should be carefully selected by evaluating their cross-references and appraising them critically [ 37 ]. Students should also be able to understand and summarize the learned materials and explain them using their own words [ 4 , 34 ]. The subthemes of the intrinsic empowerment theme are summarized in Table ​ Table3 3 .

 Intrinsic empowerment subtheme with the learning behavior elements

Theme 2: Entrustment

Entrustment emphasizes the various roles of students in PBL that can promote effective learning. The first entrusted role identified is “student as an assessor.” This means that students evaluate their own performance in PBL [ 46 ]. The evaluation of their own performance must be based on the achievement of the learning outcomes and reflect actual understanding of the content as well as the ability to apply the learned information in problem-solving [ 46 ].

The second element identified in this review is “student as a teacher.” To ensure successful peer teaching in PBL, students need to comprehensively understand the content of the learning materials and summarize the content in an organized manner. The students should be able to explain the gist of the discussed information using their own words [ 4 , 34 ] and utilize teaching methods to cater to differences in learning styles (i.e., visual, auditory, and kinesthetic) [ 41 ]. These strategies help capture their group members’ attention and evoke interactive discussions among them.

The third element of entrustment is to “give feedback.” Students should try giving constructive feedback on individual and group performance in PBL. Feedback on individual performance must reflect the quality of the content and task presented in the PBL. Feedback on group performance should reflect the ways in which the group members communicate and complete the group task [ 47 ]. To ensure continuous constructive feedback, students should be able to generate feedback questions beforehand and immediately deliver them during the PBL sessions [ 44 , 47 ]. In addition, the feedback must include specific measures for improvement to help their peers to take appropriate action for the future [ 47 ].

The fourth element of entrustment is “receive feedback.” Students should listen carefully to the feedback given and ask questions to clarify the feedback [ 47 ]. They need to be attentive and learn to deal with negative feedback [ 47 ]. Also, if the student does not receive feedback, they should request it either from peers or teachers and ask specific questions, such as what aspects to improve and how to improve [ 47 ]. The data on the subthemes of the entrustment theme are summarized in Table ​ Table4 4 .

Entrustment subtheme with the learning behavior elements

Theme 3: Functional Skills

Functional skills refer to essential skills that can help students learn independently and competently. The first element identified is time management skills. In PBL, students must know how to prioritize learning tasks according to the needs and urgency of the tasks [ 40 ]. To ensure that students can self-pace their learning, a deadline should be set for each learning task within a manageable and achievable learning schedule [ 40 ].

Furthermore, students should have digital proficiency, the ability to utilize digital devices to support learning [ 38 , 40 , 44 ]. The student needs to know how to operate basic software (e.g., Words and PowerPoints) and the basic digital tools (i.e., social media, cloud storage, simulation, and online community learning platforms) to support their learning [ 39 , 40 ]. These skills are important for peer learning activities, which may require information sharing, information retrieval, online peer discussion, and online peer feedback [ 38 , 44 ].

The third functional skill identified is data management, the ability to collect key information in the PBL trigger and analyze that information to support the solution in a problem-solving activity [ 39 ]. Students need to work either individually or in a group to collect the key information from a different trigger or case format such as text lines, an interview, an investigation, or statistical results [ 39 ]. Subsequently, students also need to analyze the information and draw conclusions based on their analysis [ 39 ].

The fourth element of functional skill is collaboration. Students need to participate equally in the PBL discussion [ 41 , 46 ]. Through discussion, confusion and queries can be addressed and resolved by listening, respecting others’ viewpoints, and responding professionally [ 35 , 39 , 43 , 44 ]. In addition, the students need to learn from each other and reflect on their performance [ 48 ]. Table ​ Table5 5 summarizes the data on the subthemes of the functional skills theme.

Functional skills subtheme with the learning behavior elements

This scoping review outlines three themes of effective learning behavior elements in the PBL context: intrinsic empowerment, entrustment, and functional skills. Hence, it is evident from this review that successful PBL instruction demands students’ commitment to empower themselves with value-driven behaviors, skills, and roles.

In this review, intrinsic empowerment is viewed as enforcement of students’ internal strength in performing positive learning behaviors related to PBL. This theme requires the student to proactively engage in the learning process, organize their learning activities systematically, persevere in learning, and be intelligently resourceful. One of the elements of intrinsic empowerment is the identification and analysis of problems related to complex scenarios. This element is aligned with a study by Meyer [ 49 ], who observed students’ engagement in problem identification and clarification prior to problem-solving activities in a PBL session related to multiple engineering design. Rubenstein and colleagues [ 50 ] discovered in a semi-structured interview the importance of undergoing a problem identification process before proposing a solution during learning. It was reported that the problem identification process in PBL may enhance the attainment of learning outcomes, specifically in the domain of concept understanding [ 51 ].

The ability of the students to acquire and manage learning resources is essential for building their understanding of the learned materials and enriching discussion among team members during PBL. This is aligned with a study by Jeong and Hmelo-Silver [ 52 ], who studied the use of learning resources by students in PBL. The study concluded that in a resource-rich environment, the students need to learn how to access and understand the resources to ensure effective learning. Secondly, they need to process the content of the resources, integrate various resources, and apply them in problem-solving activities. Finally, they need to use the resources in collaborative learning activities, such as sharing and relating to peer resources.

Wong [ 53 ] documented that excellent students spent considerably more time managing academic resources than low achievers. The ability of the student to identify and utilize their internal learning resources, such as prior knowledge and experience, is also important. A study by Lee et al. [ 54 ] has shown that participants with high domain-specific prior knowledge displayed a more systematic approach and high accuracy in visual and motor reactions in solving problems compared to novice learners.

During the discussion phase in PBL, organizing ideas—e.g., arranging relevant information gathered from the learning resources into relevant categories—is essential for communicating the idea clearly [ 34 ]. This finding is in line with a typology study conducted by Larue [ 55 ] on second-year nursing students’ learning strategies during a group discussion. The study discovered that although the content presented by the student is adequate, they unable to make further progress in the group discussion until they are instructed by the tutor on how to organize the information given into a category [ 55 ].

Hence, the empowerment of student intrinsic behavior may enhance students’ learning in PBL by allowing them to make a decision in their learning objectives and instilling confidence in them to achieve goals. A study conducted by Kirk et al. [ 56 ] proved that highly empowered students obtain better grades, increase learning participation, and target higher educational aspirations.

Entrustment is the learning role given to students to be engaging and identify gaps in their learning. This theme requires the student to engage in self-assessment, prepare to teach others, give constructive feedback, and value the feedback received. One of the elements of entrustment is the ability to self-assess. In a study conducted by Mohd et al. [ 57 ] looking at the factors in PBL that can strengthen the capability of IT students, they discovered that one of the critical factors that contribute to these skills is the ability of the student to perform self-assessment in PBL. As mentioned by Daud, Kassim, and Daud [ 58 ], the self-assessment may be more reliable if the assessment is performed based on the objectives set beforehand and if the criteria of the assessment are understood by the learner. This is important to avoid the fact that the result of the self-assessment is influenced by the students’ perception of themselves rather than reflecting their true performance. However, having an assessment based on the learning objective only focuses on the immediate learning requirements in the PBL. To foster lifelong learning skills, it should also be balanced with the long-term focus of assessment, such as utilizing the assessment to foster the application of knowledge in solving real-life situations. This is aligned with the review by Boud and Falchikov [ 59 ] suggesting that students need to become assessors within the concept of participation in practice, that is, the kind that is within the context of real life and work.

The second subtheme of entrustment is “students as a teacher” in PBL. In our review, the student needs to be well prepared with the teaching materials. A cross-sectional study conducted by Charoensakulchai and colleagues discovered that student preparation is considered among the important factors in PBL success, alongside other factors such as “objective and contents,” “student assessment,” and “attitude towards group work” [ 60 ]. This is also aligned with a study conducted by Sukrajh [ 61 ] using focus group discussion on fifth-year medical students to explore their perception of preparedness before conducting peer teaching activity. In this study, the student in the focus group expressed that the preparation made them more confident in teaching others because preparing stimulated them to activate and revise prior knowledge, discover their knowledge gaps, construct new knowledge, reflect on their learning, improve their memory, inspire them to search several resources, and motivate them to learn the topics.

The next element of “student as a teacher” is using various learning styles to teach other members in the group. A study conducted by Almomani [ 62 ] showed that the most preferred learning pattern by the high school student is the visual pattern, followed by auditory pattern and then kinesthetic. However, in the university setting, Hamdani [ 63 ] discovered that students prefer a combination of the three learning styles. Anbarasi [ 64 ] also explained that incorporating teaching methods based on the student’s preferred learning style further promotes active learning among the students and significantly improved the long-term retrieval of knowledge. However, among the three learning styles group, he discovered that the kinesthetic group with the kinesthetic teaching method showed a significantly higher post-test score compared to the traditional group with the didactic teaching method, and he concluded that this is because of the involvement of more active learning activity in the kinesthetic group.

The ability of students to give constructive feedback on individual tasks is an important element in promoting student contribution in PBL because feedback from peers or teachers is needed to reassure themselves that they are on the right track in the learning process. Kamp et al. [ 65 ] performed a study on the effectiveness of midterm peer feedback on student individual cognitive, collaborative, and motivational contributions in PBL. The experimental group that received midterm peer feedback combined with goal-setting with face-to-face discussion showed an increased amount of individual contributions in PBL. Another element of effective feedback is that the feedback is given immediately after the observed behavior. Parikh and colleagues survey student feedback in PBL environments among 103 final-year medical students in five Ontario schools, including the University of Toronto, McMaster University, Queens University, the University of Ottawa, and the University of Western Ontario. They discovered that there was a dramatic difference between McMaster University and other universities in the immediacy of feedback they practiced. Seventy percent of students at McMaster reported receiving immediate feedback in PBL, compared to less than 40 percent of students from the other universities, in which most of them received feedback within one week or several weeks after the PBL had been conducted [ 66 ]. Another study, conducted among students of the International Medical University of Kuala Lumpur examining the student expectation on feedback, discovered that immediate feedback is effective if the feedback is in written form, simple but focused on the area of improvement, and delivered by a content expert. If the feedback is delivered by a content non-expert and using a model answer, it must be supplemented with teacher dialogue sessions to clarify the feedback received [ 67 ].

Requesting feedback from peers and teachers is an important element of the PBL learning environment, enabling students to discover their learning gaps and ways to fill them. This is aligned with a study conducted by de Jong and colleagues [ 68 ], who discovered that high-performing students are more motivated to seek feedback than low-performing students. The main reason for this is because high-performing students seek feedback as a tool to learn from, whereas low-performing students do so as an academic requirement. This resulted in high-performing students collecting more feedback. A study by Bose and Gijselaers [ 69 ] examined the factors that promote feedback-seeking behavior in medical residency. They discovered that feedback-seeking behavior can be promoted by providing residents with high-quality feedback to motivate them to ask for feedback for improvement.

By assigning an active role to students as teachers, assessors, and feedback providers, teachers give them the ownership and responsibility to craft their learning. The learner will then learn the skills to monitor and reflect on their learning to achieve academic success. Furthermore, an active role encourages students to be evaluative experts in their own learning, and promoting deep learning [ 70 ].

Functional skills refer to essential abilities for competently performing a task in PBL. This theme requires the student to organize and plan time for specific learning tasks, be digitally literate, use data effectively to support problem-solving, and work together efficiently to achieve agreed objectives. One of the elements in this theme is to have a schedule of learning tasks with deadlines. In a study conducted by Tadjer and colleagues [ 71 ], they discovered that setting deadlines with a restricted time period in a group activity improved students’ cognitive abilities and soft skills. Although the deadline may initially cause anxiety, coping with it encourages students to become more creative and energetic in performing various learning strategies [ 72 , 73 ]. Ballard et al. [ 74 ] reported that students tend to work harder to complete learning tasks if they face multiple deadlines.

The students also need to be digitally literate—i.e., able to demonstrate the use of technological devices and tools in PBL. Taradi et al. [ 75 ] discovered that incorporating technology in learning—blending web technology with PBL—removes time and place barriers in the creation of a collaborative environment. It was found that students who participated in web discussions achieved a significantly higher mean grade on a physiology final examination than those who used traditional methods. Also, the incorporation of an online platform in PBL can facilitate students to develop investigation and inquiry skills with high-level cognitive thought processes, which is crucial to successful problem-solving [ 76 ].

In PBL, students need to work collaboratively with their peers to solve problems. A study by Hidayati et al. [ 77 ] demonstrated that effective collaborative skills improve cognitive learning outcomes and problem-solving ability among students who undergo PBL integrated with digital mind maps. To ensure successful collaborative learning in PBL, professional communication among students is pertinent. Research by Zheng and Huang [ 78 ] has proven that co-regulation (i.e., warm and responsive communication that provides support to peers) improved collaborative effort and group performance among undergraduate and master’s students majoring in education and psychology. This is also in line with a study by Maraj and colleagues [ 79 ], which showed the strong team interaction within the PBL group leads to a high level of team efficacy and academic self-efficacy. Moreover, strengthening communication competence, such as by developing negotiation skills among partners during discussion sessions, improves student scores [ 80 ].

PBL also includes opportunities for students to learn from each other (i.e., peer learning). A study by Maraj et al. [ 79 ] discovered that the majority of the students in their study perceived improvement in their understanding of the learned subject when they learned from each other. Another study by Lyonga [ 81 ] documented the successful formation of cohesive group learning, where students could express and share their ideas with their friends and help each other. It was suggested that each student should be paired with a more knowledgeable student who has mastered certain learning components to promote purposeful structured learning within the group.

From this scoping review, it is clear that functional skills equip the students with abilities and knowledge needed for successful PBL. Studies have shown that strong time management skills, digital literacy, data management, and collaborative skills lead to positive academic achievement [ 77 , 82 , 83 ].

Limitation of the Study

This scoping review is aimed to capture the recent effective learning behavior in problem-based learning; therefore, the literature before 2015 was not included. Without denying the importance of publication before 2015, we are relying on Okoli and Schabram [ 84 ] who highlighted the impossibility of retrieving all the published articles when conducting a literature search. Based on this ground, we decided to focus on the time frame between 2015 and 2019, which is aligned with the concepts of study maturity (i.e., the more mature the field, the higher the published articles and therefore more topics were investigated) by Kraus et al. [ 85 ]. In fact, it was noted that within this time frame, a significant number of articles have been found as relevant to PBL with the recent discovery of effective learning behavior. Nevertheless, our time frame did not include the timing of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak, which began at the end of 2019. Hence, we might miss some important elements of learning behavior that are required for the successful implementation of PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Surprisingly, the results obtained from this study are also applicable for the PBL sessions administration during the COVID-19 pandemic situation as one of the functional skills identified is digital proficiency. This skill is indeed important for the successful implementation of online PBL session.

This review identified the essential learning behaviors required for effective PBL in higher education and clustered them into three main themes: (i) intrinsic empowerment, (ii) entrustment, and (iii) functional skills. These learning behaviors must coexist to ensure the achievement of desired learning outcomes. In fact, the findings of this study indicated two important implications for future practice. Firstly, the identified learning behaviors can be incorporated as functional elements in the PBL framework and implementation. Secondly, the learning behaviors change and adaption can be considered to be a new domain of formative assessment related to PBL. It is noteworthy to highlight that these learning behaviors could help in fostering the development of lifelong skills for future workplace challenges. Nevertheless, considerably more work should be carried out to design a solid guideline on how to systematically adopt the learning behaviors in PBL sessions, especially during this COVID-19 pandemic situation.

This study was supported by Postgraduate Incentive Grant-PhD (GIPS-PhD, grant number: 311/PPSP/4404803).

Declarations

The study has received an ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of Universiti Sains Malaysia.

No informed consent required for the scoping review.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Team- and problem-based learning in health services: a systematic literature review of recent initiatives in the united states.

1. Introduction

1.1. team-based learning, 1.2. combined team-based learning and problem-based learning, 1.3. the global pandemic, 2. materials and methods.

• Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
• Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases, registries).
• Present the full search strategy for at least one database.
• State the process for selecting studies.
• Describe the method of data extraction and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators.
• List and define all variables for which data were sought.
• Describe methods used to evaluate the risk of bias.
• Describe the methods of handling data and combining results of studies.
• Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions.
• For each study, present characteristics and collected data.
• Summarize the main findings.
• Discuss limitations at study and outcome level, and at the review level.
• Provide a general interpretation of the results and their implications for future research.

2.1. Inclusion Process

2.2. exclusion process.

• Review articles (2 articles);
• International article (1 article);
• Not germane to the topic (105 articles): ○ International study (10 articles); ○ Not higher education (primary/secondary education only, 3 articles); ○ Specifically medical-related only (48 articles); ○ No problem-based or team-based learning (18 articles); ○ Other non-health services related studies (26 articles).
• High-impact learning methods for critical thinking;
• Modified problem-based learning, lessons learned/COVID-19 issues;
• Newer methods—simulation, games, puzzle/escape;
• Active learning methods in an online environment (time, effort, scalability);
• Meeting needs of age, cognitive styles, or developmental phase of students;
• PBL/TBL and improvement of instructor feedback or students’ ability to self-assess;
• Cultural competencies and communication;
• Organizational leadership, team-based learning/collaboration.
• TBL and PBL transform healthcare education; modified PBL is the new norm.
• TBL and PBL amplify age-appropriate principles for professional motivation in healthcare.
• Active learning impacts students’ practical abilities for professional success and future leadership roles.

4. Discussion

4.1. high-impact learning methods for critical thinking, 4.2. modified problem-based learning, lessons learned/covid-19 issues, 4.3. newer methods—simulation, games, puzzle/escape rooms, 4.4. active learning methods in an online environment (time, effort, scalability), 4.5. meeting needs of age, cognitive styles, or developmental phase of students, 4.6. pbl/tbl and improvement of instructor feedback or students’ ability to self-assess, 4.7. cultural competencies and communication, 4.8. organizational leadership, team-based learning/collaboration, 4.9. limitations, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

• International Labour Office. Global Skills Trends, Training Needs and Life Long Learning Strategies for the Future of Work (International Labour Conference Report) ; International Labour Office: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dinh, J.V.; Traylor, A.M.; Kilcullen, M.P.; Perez, J.A.; Schweissing, E.J.; Venkatesh, A.; Salas, E. Cross-Disciplinary Care: A Systematic Review on Teamwork Processes in Health Care. Small Group Res. 2020 , 51 , 125–166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Michaelson, L.K.; Sweet, M. The Essential Elements of Team-Based Learning. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2008 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Park, H.-R.; Park, E. Team-Based Learning Experiences of Nursing Students in a Health Assessment Subject: A Qualitative Study. Healthcare 2022 , 10 , 817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Yang, S.-Y.; Liu, C.; Hsieh, P.-L. Effects of Team-Based Learning on Students’ Teamwork, Learning Attitude, and Health Care Competence for Older People in the Community to Achieve SDG-3. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 6632. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Babenko, O.; Ding, M.; Lee, A.S. In-Person or Online? The Effect of Delivery Mode on Team-Based Learning of Clinical Reasoning in a Family Medicine Clerkship. Med. Sci. 2022 , 10 , 41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wu, S.; Zha, S.; Estis, J.; Li, X. Advancing Engineering Students’ Technical Writing Skills by Implementing Team-Based Learning Instructional Modules in an Existing Laboratory Curriculum. Educ. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 520. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jalinus, N.; Nabawi, R.; Mardin, A. The seven steps of project based learning model to enhance productive competences of vocational students. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology and Vocational Teachers (ICTVT 2017) ; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eskola, E.L. Information literacy of medical students studying in the problem-based and traditional curriculum. Inf. Res. 2005 , 10 , 203–238. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1082011.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2023).
• Walsh, A. The Tutor in Problem-Based Learning: A Novice’s Guide ; Program for Faculty Development, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences: Hamilton, ON, USA, 2005; Available online: https://srs-slp.healthsci.mcmaster.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/novice-tutor-guide-2005.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2024).
• Dolmans, D.; Michaelsen, L.; van Merriënboer, J.; van der Vleuten, C. Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds! Med. Teach. 2015 , 37 , 354–359. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Umar, M.; Ko, I. E-Learning: Direct Effect of Student Learning Effectiveness and Engagement through Project-Based Learning, Team Cohesion, and Flipped Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 1724. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alexander Eileen, S.; Browne, F.R.; Eberhart, A.E.; Rhiney, S.L.; Janzen, J.; Dale, K.; Vasquez, P. Community Service-Learning Improves Learning Outcomes, Content Knowledge, and Perceived Value of Health Services Education: A Multiyear Comparison to Lecture. Int. J. Res. Serv.-Learn. Community Engag. 2020 , 8 , 18079. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Amaral, J.; Santos, R. Combining project-based learning and community-based research in a research methodology course: The lessons learned. Int. J. Instr. 2018 , 11 , 47–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lieneck, C.; Wang, T.; Gibbs, D.; Russian, C.; Ramamonjiarivelo, Z.; Ari, A. Interprofessional Education and Research in the Health Professions: A Systematic Review and Supplementary Topic Modeling. Educ. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 850. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Klapproth, F.; Federkeil, L.; Heinschke, F.; Jungmann, T. Teachers’ experiences of stress and their coping strategies during COVID-19 induced distance teaching. J. Pedagog. Res. 2020 , 4 , 444–452. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lin, P.H.; Huang, L.R.; Lin, S.H. Why teaching innovation matters: Evidence from a pre- versus peri-COVID-19 pandemic comparison of student evaluation data. Front. Psychol. 2022 , 13 , 963953. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Suartama, I.K.; Triwahyuni, E.; Suranata, K. Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning Based on Case Methods and Team-Based Projects: Design and Validation. Educ. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 802. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Naar, J.J.; Weaver, R.H.; Sonnier-Netto, L.; Few-Demo, A. Experiential education through project-based learning: Sex and aging. Gerontol. Geriatr. Educ. 2021 , 42 , 528–540. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Littleton, C.; Bolus, V.; Wood, T.; Clark, J.; Wingo, N.; Watts, P. What Would You Do?: Engaging Remote Learners through Stop-Action Videos. Nurse Educ. 2023 , 48 , 158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Helbing, R.R.; Lapka, S.; Richdale, K.; Hatfield, C.L. In-person and online escape rooms for individual and team-based learning in health professions library instruction. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2022 , 110 , 507–512. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Whillier, S.; Lystad, R.P.; El-Haddad, J. Team-based learning in neuroanatomy. J. Chiropr. Educ. 2021 , 35 , 184–191. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luke, A.M.; Mathew, S.; Kuriadom, S.T.; George, J.M.; Karobari, M.I.; Marya, A.; Pawar, A.M. Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning versus Traditional Teaching Methods in Improving Acquisition of Radiographic Interpretation Skills among Dental Students—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2021 , 2021 , 9630285. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Henderson, K.J.; Coppens, E.R.; Burns, S. Addressing Barriers to Implementing Problem- Based Learning. AANA J. 2021 , 89 , 117–124. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Hurt-Avila, K.M.; DeDiego, A.C.; Starr, J. Teaching Counseling Research and Program Evaluation through Problem-Based Service Learning. J. Creat. Ment. Health 2023 , 18 , 105–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shorten, A.; Cruz Walma, D.A.; Bosworth, P.; Shorten, B.; Chang, B.; Moore, M.D.; Vogtle, L.; Watts, P.I. Development and implementation of a virtual “collaboratory” to foster interprofessional team-based learning using a novel faculty-student partnership. J. Prof. Nurs. 2023 , 46 , 155–162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Manske, J.; Hayes, H.; Zahner, S. The New to Public Health Residency Program Supports Transition to Public Health Practice. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2022 , 28 , E728. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Veneri, D.A.; Mongillo, E.M.N. Flop to Flip: Integrating Technology and Team-Based Learning to Improve Student Engagement. Internet J. Allied Health Sci. Pract. 2021 , 19 , 1–10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eudaley, S.T.; Farland, M.Z.; Melton, T.; Brooks, S.P.; Heidel, R.E.; Franks, A.S. Student Performance on Graded versus Ungraded Readiness Assurance Tests in a Team-Based Learning Elective. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2022 , 86 , 1038–1043. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Seibert, S.A. Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z’s critical thinking and perseverance. Teach. Learn. Nurs. 2021 , 16 , 85–88. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Walker, J.K.L.; Richard-Eaglin, A.; Hegde, A.; Muckler, V.C. A deep learning approach to student registered nurse anesthetist (SRNA) education. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 2021 , 18 , 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bavarian, R.; de Dhaem, O.B.; Shaefer, J.R. Implementing Virtual Case-Based Learning in Dental Interprofessional Education. Pain Med. 2021 , 22 , 2787. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Woodworth, J.A. Nursing Students’ Home Care Learning Delivered in an Innovative 360-Degree Immersion Experience. Nurse Educ. 2022 , 47 , E136. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tomesko, J.; Cohen, D.; Bridenbaugh, J. Using a virtual flipped classroom model to promote critical thinking in online graduate courses in the United States: A case presentation. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof. 2022 , 19 , 5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carpenter, R.E.; Silberman, D.; Takemoto, J.K. The Student Engagement Effect of Team-Based Learning on Student Pharmacists. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2022 , 86 , 395–401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Diaz, D.A.; McVerry, K.; Spears, S.; Dèaz, R.Z.; Stauffer, L.T. Using Experiential Learning in Escape Rooms to Deliver Policies and Procedures in Academic and Acute Care Settings. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2021 , 42 , E168. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hopkins, K.; Meyer, M.; Afkinich, J. Diversifying the pipeline of social work students prepared to implement performance measurement. J. Soc. Work Educ. 2022 , 58 , 702–718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Muirhead, L.; Kaplan, B.; Childs, J.; Brevick, I.; Cadet, A.; Ibraheem Muhammad, Y.; Kemp, L.; Coffee-Dunning, K.; Echt, K.V. Role Reversal: In-Situ Simulation to Enhance the Value of Interprofessional Team-Based Care. J. Nurs. Educ. 2022 , 61 , 595. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, S.; Edwards, P.C.; Zahl, D.; John, V.; Bhamidipalli, S.S.; Eckert, G.J.; Stewart, K.T. The impact of dental curriculum format on student performance on the national board dental examination. J. Dent. Educ. 2022 , 86 , 661–669. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Avery, M.D.; Mathiason, M.; Andrighetti, T.; Autry, A.M.; Cammarano, D.; Dau, K.Q.; Hoffman, S.; Krause, S.A.; Montgomery, O.; Perry, A.; et al. Improved Self-Assessed Collaboration through Interprofessional Education: Midwifery Students and Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents Learning Together. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2022 , 67 , 598–607. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Martirosov, A.L.; Moser, L.R. Team-based Learning to Promote the Development of Metacognitive Awareness and Monitoring in Pharmacy Students. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2021 , 85 , 131. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Powers, K.; Kulkarni, S.; Romaine, A.; Mange, D.; Little, C.; Cheng, I. Interprofessional student hotspotting: Preparing future health professionals to deliver team-based care for complex patients. J. Prof. Nurs. 2022 , 38 , 17–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elaimy, C.; Melton, B.; Davidson, G.; Persky, A.; Meyer, E. Availability of Didactic and Experiential Learning Opportunities in Veterinary Practice at US Pharmacy Programs. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2022 , 86 , 324–329. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Duck, A.A.; Stewart, M.W. A pedagogical redesign for online pathophysiology. Teach. Learn. Nurs. 2021 , 16 , 362–364. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pence, P.L.; Franzen, S.R.; Kim, M.J. Flipping to Motivate: Perceptions Among Prelicensure Nursing Students. Nurse Educ. 2021 , 46 , 43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lybarger, K.; Ostendorf, M.; Yetisgen, M. Annotating social determinants of health using active learning, and characterizing determinants using neural event extraction. J. Biomed. Inform. 2021 , 113 , 103631. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Powell, B.D.; Oxley, M.S.; Chen, K.; Anksorus, H.; Hubal, R.; Persky, A.M.; Harris, S. A Concept Mapping Activity to Enhance Pharmacy Students’ Metacognition and Comprehension of Fundamental Disease State Knowledge. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2021 , 85 , 340–344. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Flores-Sandoval, C.; Sibbald, S.; Ryan, B.L.; Orange, J.B. Interprofessional team-based geriatric education and training: A review of interventions in Canada. Gerontol. Geriatr. Educ. 2021 , 42 , 178–195. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Blaine, K.P.; Dudaryk, R.; Milne, A.D.; Moon, T.S.; Nagy, D.; Sappenfield, J.W.; Teng, J.J. Training Anesthesiology Residents to Care for the Traumatically Injured in the United States. Anesth. Analg. 2023 , 136 , 861. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Acker, L.; Bova Campbell, K.; Naglee, C.; Taicher, B.; Bronshteyn, Y.S. Perioperative Management of Flecainide: A Problem-Based Learning Discussion. A&A Pract. 2021 , 15 , e01443. [ Google Scholar ]
• McCaffery, J.; Barrett, M.; Daingerfield, M.; Noivakowski, K.; Leckie, C. An Interprofessional Education (IPE) Experience with a Scaffolded Teaching Design. J. Allied Health 2023 , 52 , 75. [ Google Scholar ]
• Prince, A.D.P.; Green, A.R.; Brown, D.J.; Thompson, D.M.; Neblett, E.W., Jr.; Nathan, C.-A.; Carethers, J.M. The Clarion Call of the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Medical Education Can Mitigate Racial and Ethnic Disparities. Acad. Med. 2021 , 96 , 1518. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mattingly, J.A. Fostering Cultural Safety in Nursing Education: Experiential Learning on an American Indian Reservation. Contemp. Nurse A J. Aust. Nurs. Prof. 2021 , 57 , 370–378. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Williams, C.; Familusi, O.O.; Ziemba, J.; Lee, D.; Mittal, S.; Mucksavage, P.; Smith, A.; Kovell, R.C. Adapting to the Educational Challenges of a Pandemic: Development of a Novel Virtual Urology Subinternship during the Time of COVID-19. Urology 2021 , 148 , 70–76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tomeh, H.; Bay, R.C.; Lovell, K.; Hong, M. Self-motivation and self-direction in team-based and case-based learning. J. Dent. Educ. 2021 , 85 (Suppl. S3), 2007–2008. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Andrienko, T.; Genin, V.; Kozubska, I. Developing Intercultural Business Competence via Team Learning in Post-Pandemic Era. Adv. Educ. 2021 , 18 , 53–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Henriksen, K.; Rodrick, D.; Grace, E.N.; Shofer, M.; Jeffrey Brady, P. Pursuing Patient Safety at the Intersection of Design, Systems Engineering, and Health Care Delivery Research: An Ongoing Assessment. J. Patient Saf. 2021 , 17 , e1685–e1690. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Meeuwissen, S.N.E.; Gijselaers, W.H.; van Oorschot, T.D.; Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P.; Egbrink, M.G.A.O. Enhancing Team Learning through Leader Inclusiveness: A One-Year Ethnographic Case Study of an Interdisciplinary Teacher Team. Teach. Learn. Med. 2021 , 33 , 498–508. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tarras, S.L.; Thacker, J.; Bouwman, D.L.; Edelman, D.A. Effective Large Group Teaching for General Surgery. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2021 , 101 , 565–576. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Franic, D.M.; Palmer, R.; Fulford, M. Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. 2021 , 13 , 819–825. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mills, M.; Winston, B. Designing and Implementing Problem Based Learning Techniques to Supplement Clinical Experiences. J. Allied Health 2022 , 51 , 78. [ Google Scholar ]
• Clapper, T.C. Getting Better Together: The Two-Team Training Approach in Simulation-Based Education. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2021 , 52 , 417. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brown, J.R.; Solomon, R.; Stabler, M.E.; Davis, S.; Carpenter-Song, E.; Zubkoff, L.; Westerman, D.M.; Dorn, C.; Cox, K.C.; Minter, F.; et al. Team-Based Coaching Intervention to Improve Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury A Cluster-Randomized Trial. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2023 , 18 , 315–326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Parker, Z.; Shasti, B.; Chung, J.; Taylor, K. Changing Geographic Distributions of Coccidioides spp. in the United States: A Narrative Review of Climate Change Implications. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022 , 116 , S22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vasquez Guzman, C.E.; Sussman, A.L.; Kano, M.; Getrich, C.M.; Williams, R.L. A Comparative Case Study Analysis of Cultural Competence Training at 15 U. S. Medical Schools. Acad. Med. 2021 , 96 , 894. [ Google Scholar ]
• White, K.A.; Chaplin, L.T.; Heitzler, E.T. Engaging Online Graduate Students with Statistical Procedures: A Team-Based Learning Approach. Nurse Educ. 2020 , 46 , 138–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haley, C.M.; Brown, B. Adapting problem-based learning curricula to a virtual environment. J. Dent. Educ. 2021 , 85 , 878–879. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wilson, M. Interprofessional Education on Pain and Opioid Use Meets Team-based Learning Needs. Pain Manag. Nurs. 2021 , 22 , 237–238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Soncrant, C.; Neily, J.; Sum-Ping, S.J.T.; Wallace, A.W.; Mariano, E.R.; Leissner, K.B.; Mills, P.D. Sharing Lessons Learned to Prevent Adverse Events in Anesthesiology Nationwide. J. Patient Saf. 2021 , 17 , e343. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Raff, A.C. Great nephrologists begin with great teachers: Update on the nephrology curriculum. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2021 , 30 , 215. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Awan, O.A. The Flipped Classroom: How to Do it in Radiology Education. Acad. Radiol. 2021 , 28 , 1820–1821. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Souza, I. 811Teaching “syndemic theory” in a High School class: A Problem Based Learning approach. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2021 , 50 , 168–626. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ha, T.; Kemp, B.; Wallace, M. 315A new strategy for teaching Epidemiology in Public Health Education: Hybrid Team Based Learning-Personalised Education. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2021 , 50 , 91. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ackermann, D.; Blyth, F.; Burgess, A.; Reid, S. 1449Rapid Evidence for Practice modules: Using team-based learning to teach evidence-based medicine. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2021 , 50 , dyab168.008. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Snow, T.M.; Lorenzi, C.; Mouradjian, D. Implementation of a Virtual Simulation-based Teamwork Training Program for Emergency Events in the Perioperative Setting. J. PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2022 , 37 , e8–e9. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cai, L.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Li, R. Implementation of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning A promising and effective teaching modality in undergraduate pathology education. Medicine 2022 , 101 , e28782. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Humphrey Beebe, L.; Elliott, L.M.; Mixer, S.J. A COVID-Related Inquiry-Focused Online Assignment for Undergraduate Nursing Students. J. Nurs. Educ. 2021 , 60 , 303–304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Griswold, C.; Koss, J. Experiential Learning Through a Board Presentation Assignment. Nurse Educ. 2021 , 46 , 333. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ajayi, T.B.; Remein, C.D.; Stafford, R.S.; Fagerlin, A.; Chung, M.K.; Childs, E.; Benjamin, E.J. A Cross-Center Virtual Education Fellowship Program for Early-Career Researchers in Atrial Fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2020 , 13 , e008552. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wiljer, D.; Williams, S.; Charow, R.; Campbell, C.; Davis, D.; Younus, S.; Mylopoulos, M. Exploring Systemic Influences on Data-Informed Learning: Document Review of Policies, Procedures, and Legislation from Canada and the United States. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 2022 , 42 , 219. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kaul, V.; Morris, A.; Chae, J.M.; Town, J.A.; Kelly, W.F. Delivering a Novel Medical Education “Escape Room” at a National Scientific Conference: First Live, Then Pivoting to Remote Learning Because of COVID-19. Chest 2021 , 160 , 1424–1432. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moran, V.; Blanchette, J.; Whitley, H.; Pillion, D.; Albritton, A.; Israel, H. Changes in attitudes toward diabetes in nursing students at diabetes camp. Public Health Nurs. 2021 , 38 , 579–587. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abuqayyas, S.; Yurosko, C.; Ali, A.; Rymer, C.; Stoller, J.K. Bedside Manner 2020: An Inventory of Best Practices. South Med. J. 2021 , 114 , 156. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martinchek, M.; McKean, M.; Merson, J. Active Learning in the Virtual Environment. Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions (ASAHP) Annual Conference October 20–21, 2021, The Westin Long Beach, Long Beach, California. J. Allied Health 2022 , 51 , 76. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hughes, V.; Cologer, S.; Swoboda, S.; Rushton, C. Strengthening internal resources to promote resilience among prelicensure nursing students. J. Prof. Nurs. 2021 , 37 , 777–783. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Blazer, D.G.; Colenda, C.C.; Applegate, W.B.; Reifler, B.V. The Great Health Paradox: A Call for Increasing Investment in Public Health. Acad. Med. 2022 , 97 , 484. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Vanderhoof, M.; Miller, S. Utilizing innovative teaching methods to design a new geriatric pharmacy elective. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. 2021 , 13 , 749–752. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Morrow, E.L.; Turkstra, L.S.; Duff, M.C. Confidence and Training of Speech-Language Pathologists in Cognitive-Communication Disorders: Time to Rethink Graduate Education Models? Am. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 2021 , 30 , 986–992. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Airasian, P.W.; Cruikshank, K.A.; Mayer, R.E.; Pintrich, P.R.; Raths, J.; Wittrock, M.C. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete Edition) ; Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Eds.; Longman: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mahmood, M.A.; Tariq, M.; Javed, S. Academic Research International strategies for active learning: An alternative to passive learning. Acad. Res. Int. 2011 , 1 , 193. Available online: www.savap.org.pkwww.journals.savap.org.pk (accessed on 28 April 2024).
• Knowles, M.S. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy versus Pedagogy ; Association Press: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sperling, J.; Tucker, R.W. For-Profit Higher Education: Developing a World-Class Workforce ; Transaction Publishers: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pee, B.; Woodman, T.; Fry, H.; Davenport, S. Practice-based learning: Views on the development of a reflective learning tool. Med. Educ. 2000 , 34 , 754–761. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khanna, S.K.; Cheyney, M.; Engle, M. Cultural Competency in Health Care: Evaluating the Outcomes of a Cultural Competency Training among Health Care Professionals. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2009 , 101 , 886–892. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Napier, A.D.; Ancarno, C.; Butler, B.; Calabrese, J.; Chater, A.; Chatterjee, H.; Guesnet, F.; Horne, R.; Jacyna, S.; Jadhav, S.; et al. Culture and health. Lancet 2014 , 384 , 1607–1639. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Alexander, E.S.; White, A.A.; Varol, A.; Appel, K.; Lieneck, C. Team- and Problem-Based Learning in Health Services: A Systematic Literature Review of Recent Initiatives in the United States. Educ. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050515

Alexander ES, White AA, Varol A, Appel K, Lieneck C. Team- and Problem-Based Learning in Health Services: A Systematic Literature Review of Recent Initiatives in the United States. Education Sciences . 2024; 14(5):515. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050515

Alexander, Eileen S., Ashley A. White, Ashley Varol, Kacey Appel, and Cristian Lieneck. 2024. "Team- and Problem-Based Learning in Health Services: A Systematic Literature Review of Recent Initiatives in the United States" Education Sciences 14, no. 5: 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050515

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

• DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00012
• Corpus ID: 25261260

Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues

• M. Albanese , Susan Mitchell
• Published in Academic medicine : journal… 1 January 1993
• Education, Medicine
• Academic Medicine

2,800 Citations

Problem‐based learning: measurable outcomes, effectiveness of problem‐based learning curricula: research and theory, review of the literature on pbl in the clinical setting, problem-based learning: student learning experiences and outcomes, constructivist, problem-based learning does work: a meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school.

• Highly Influenced

An evaluation of problem-based learning in a nursing theory and practice module.

Problem-based learning: how do the outcomes compare with traditional teaching, evidence-based learning: a lack of evidence - letter to the editor, problem‐based learning versus lecture‐based learning in a course of basic pharmacology: a controlled, randomized study, issues in modified problem-based learning: a study in pre-service teacher education., related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

• About IJPBL

Home > Libraries > LIBRARIESPUBLISHING > PUPOAJ > IJPBL > Vol. 11 (2017) > Iss. 2

Problem-Based Learning in K–8 Mathematics and Science Education: A Literature Review

Joi Merritt , Arizona State University Follow Mi Yeon Lee , Arizona State University Follow Peter Rillero , Arizona State University Follow Barbara M. Kinach , Arizona State University Follow

This systematic literature review was conducted to explore the effectiveness of problem-based and project-based learning (PBL) implemented with students in early elementary to grade 8 (ages 3–14) in mathematics and science classrooms. Nine studies met the following inclusion criteria: (a) focus on PBL, (b) experimental study, (c) kindergarten to grade 8 level, and (d) focus on mathematics or science content. For these studies, we examined: the definitions of PBL used, the components of PBL explicitly identified as salient to student learning, and the effectiveness of PBL. This review found that although there is no consistent definition of PBL, PBL is an effective method for improving K–8 students’ science academic achievement, including knowledge retention, conceptual development, and attitudes. Implications and limitations are discussed.

Recommended Citation

Merritt, J. , Lee, M. , Rillero, P. , & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-Based Learning in K–8 Mathematics and Science Education: A Literature Review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11 (2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674

Since May 17, 2017

Included in

Elementary Education and Teaching Commons , Junior High, Intermediate, Middle School Education and Teaching Commons , Pre-Elementary, Early Childhood, Kindergarten Teacher Education Commons , Science and Mathematics Education Commons

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately, you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.

• Journal Home
• IJPBL Celebrates 10 Years: 2006-2016
• Most Popular Papers
• Receive Email Notices or RSS

Advanced Search

ISSN: 1541-5015

Published with the support of the Teaching Academy at Purdue University, the School of Education at Indiana University, and the Educational Technology program at the University of South Carolina.

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

A Review of Literature

• First Online: 14 March 2021

Cite this chapter

• Samantha S. Reed 4 ,
• Carol A. Mullen 5 &
• Emily T. Boyles 6  

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

809 Accesses

This chapter of Problem - Based Learning in Elementary Schools offers a review of the literature addressing problem-based learning (PBL) in elementary classrooms and other educational contexts. Definitions provided generally uphold PBL as a teaching method in which students gain knowledge and skills by working collaboratively to both investigate and respond to authentic and engaging open-ended questions and/or problems. Also described is the history of PBL and its instructional impact on student learning and achievement. In accordance with the current study conducted in Virginia, key strategies of PBL instruction are identified that contribute to 21st-century skills identified nationally and at the state level, which education policy in Virginia denotes as critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, and citizenship (the 5Cs). While exploring the PBL phenomenon and the relevant literature, academic achievement, student impact, and patterns are discussed. At present, much of the existing research focuses on grades K–12 in general terms or postsecondary education. Elementary grades, while investigated, continue to be underrepresented in explorations of PBL, a gap that this book helps to fill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7 (3/4), 271–311.

Google Scholar  

Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education . Springer.

Basham, J. D., Israel, M., & Maynard, K. (2010). An ecological model of STEM education: Operationalizing STEM FOR ALL. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25 (3), 9–19.

Article   Google Scholar  

BattelleforKids. (2018). Portrait of a Graduate: A first step in transforming your school system . https://portraitofagraduate.org .

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3/4), 369–398.

Carroll, M. P. (2014). Shoot for the moon! The mentors and the middle schoolers explore the intersection of design thinking and STEM. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4 (1), 14–30.

Chung, P., Yeh, R. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2016). Influence of PBL strategy on enhancing student’s industrial oriented competences learned: An action research on learning weblog analysis. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26 (2), 285–307.

Colley, K. (2008). Project-based science instruction: A primer—An introduction and learning cycle for implementing project-based science. Science Teacher, 75 (8), 23–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ817851 .

Couros, G. (2015). The innovator’s mindset. Dave Burgess Consulting.

Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education . Macmillan.

Donnelly, R. (2016). Application of Mezirow’s transformative pedagogy to blended problem-based learning (Unpublished resource paper, pp. 1–21). https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1032&context=ltcoth .

Drake, K. N., & Long, D. (2009). Rebecca’s in the dark: A comparative study of problem-based learning and direct instruction/experiential learning in two 4th grade classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21 (1), 1–16.

Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E, & Allen, D. E. (Eds.). (2001).  The power of problem-based learning . Stylus.

English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education , 2 (14). https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.vt.edu/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7 .

Estapa, A. T., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: A professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 4 (6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0058-3 .

Evans, M. A., Lopez, M., Maddox, D., Drape, T., & Duke, R. (2014). Interest-driven learning among middle school youth in an out-of-school STEM studio. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (5), 624–640.

Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research literature (Alberta Ministry of Education report). https://galileo.org/focus-on-inquiry-lit-review.pdf .

Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (8), 922–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20248 .

Gerlach, J. (2012, April). STEM: Defying a simple definition. NSTA WebNews , p. 3. [Report]. [National Science Teachers Association]. https://www.nsta.org .

Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, beliefs, and products: Students’ perspectives with project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5 (2), 37–69.

Hallinen, J. (2019). STEM education curriculum. Encyclopedia Britannica . https://www.britannica.com/topic/STEM-education .

Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16 (3), 235–266.

Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational psychologist, 42 (2), 99–107.

Holm, M. (2011). Project-based instruction: A review of the literature on effectiveness in prekindergarten through 12th grade classrooms. Rivier Academic Journal, 7 (2), 1–13.

Horak, A. K., & Galluzzo, G. R. (2017). Gifted middle school students’ achievement and perceptions of science classroom quality during problem-based learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28 (1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16683424 .

Howard Barrows. (2020). Howard Barrows . Wikipedia . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/howard_barrows .

Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. (2007). Problem-based learning. In J. M. Spector, J. G. van Merrienboer, M. D., Merrill, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 1503–1581). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Illinois Center for Innovation and Teaching & Learning. (n.d.) Problem-based learning (PBL) . https://citl.illinois.edu/citl-101/teaching-learning/resources/teaching-strategies/problem-based-learning-(pbl) .

Inel, D., & Balim, A. G. (2010). The effects of using problem-based learning in science and technology teaching upon students’ academic achievement and levels of structuring concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching , 11 (2), 1–23. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v11_issue2_files/inel.pdf .

John Dewey. (2020). John Dewey. Wikipedia . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dewey .

Jones, B. D., Epler, C. M., Mokri, P., Bryant, L. H., & Paretti, M. C. (2013). The effects of a collaborative problem-based learning experience on students’ motivation in engineering capstone courses. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7 (2), 1–71. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1344 .

Jones, M. G., & Brader-Araje, L. (2002). The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning. American Communication Journal, 5 (3), 1–10. https://ac-journal.org/journal/vol5/iss3/special/jones.pdf .

Jones, M. T., & Eick, C. J. (2007). Providing bottom-up support to middle school science teachers’ reform efforts in using inquiry-based kits. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 18 (6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9069-0 .

Kain, D. L. (2003). Problem-based learning for teachers, grades K – 8. Allyn & Bacon.

Kaplan Early Learning Company. (2017). How to teach citizenship in the elementary school classroom [Blog]. https://www.kaplanco.com/blog/post/2017/06/06/how-to-teach-citizenship-in-the-elementary-school-classroom .

Kek, M., & Huijser, H. (2017). Problem-based learning into the future. Springer.

Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25 (3), 246–258. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044508.pdf .

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 75–86. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1?needAccess=true .

Klimaitis, C. C., & Mullen, C. A. (2020). Access and barriers to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education for K–12 students with disabilities and females (pp. 1–24). In C A. Mullen (Ed.), Handbook of social justice interventions in education . Springer. http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-030-29553-0_125-1 .

Klimaitis, C. C., & Mullen, C. A. (2021). Including K–12 students with disabilities in STEM education and planning for inclusion. Educational Planning , 28 (2).

Koray, O., Presley, A., Koksal, M. S., & Ozdemir, M. (2008). Enhancing problem-solving skills of pre-service elementary school teachers through problem-based learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching , 9 (2), 1–18. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v9_issue2_files/koksal.pdf .

Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal , 94 (5), 483–497.

Larmer, J. (2013). Project based learning vs. problem based learning vs. XBL [Blog]. https://www.pblworks.org/blog/project-based-learning-vs-problem-based-learning-vs-xbl .

Marino, M. T. (2010). Defining a technology research agenda for elementary and secondary students with learning and other high-incidence disabilities in inclusive science classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25 (1), 1–27.

Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why problem-based learning works: Theoretical foundations. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 221–238.

Marzano, R. J. (2013). Art and science of teaching/ask yourself: Are students engaged? Educational Leadership, 70 (6), 81–82.

Mason, P. L. (2013). Encyclopedia of race and racism (2nd ed.). Macmillan.

McDowell, M. (2017). Rigorous PBL by design : Three shifts for developing confident and competent learners . Corwin.

Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in K–8 mathematics and science education: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11 (2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674 .

Miller, A. M. (2018). Sustainable education and the use of problem-based learning as a conceptual framework for implementation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Spaulding University, Louisville, Kentucky. https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/2029839168.html?FMT=ABS .

Mullen, C. A. (2017). Critical issues on democracy and mentoring in education: A debate in the literature. In D. A. Clutterbuck, F. K. Kochan, L. G. Lunsford, N. Dominguez, & J. Haddock-Millar (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of mentoring (pp. 34–51). Sage.

Mullen, C. A. (Ed.). (2019). Creativity under duress in education? Resistive theories, practices, and actions . Springer.

Nadelson, L. S., Pfiester, J., Callahan, J., & Pyke, P. (2015). Who is doing the engineering, the student or the teacher? The development and use of a rubric to categorize level of design for the elementary classroom. Journal of Technology Education, 26 (2), 22–45.

National Research Council of the National Academies. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K–12 STEM education: A nation advancing? The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/login.php?page=%2fbooksearch.php%3frecord_id%3d13509%26term%3dengagement .

National Education Association (NEA). (n.d.). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs” (pp. 1–37). http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf .

Neville, A. J. (2009). Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. A review of its effects on knowledge and clinical performance. Medical Principles and Practice, 18 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000163038 .

Parsons, S. A., Nuland, L. R., & Parsons, A. W. (2014). The ABCs of student engagement. Phi Delta Kappan, 95 (8), 23–27.

Sage, S. M. (1996, April). A qualitative examination of problem-based learning at the K – 8 level: Preliminary findings (pp. 1–27) (ERIC Number: ED398263). A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED398263.pdf .

Sahli, R. (2017). An examination of the effectiveness of project-based learning on student academic achievement and teacher perceptions of project-based learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). http://hdl.handle.net/11414/3337 .

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1 (1), 9–20.

Savery, J. R. & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35 (5), 31–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44428296.pdf?casa_token=_mtdoc6-dnqaaaaa:pngbub0-olzfgi0ukennm9z9owcyeb6yqqsynqiptzfymd1gfhfaoefsstinuibqvy2wjcf54rakntxjxk2kugg0n4mhmrfjs6rfyffixae2s6t9ur4 .

Semiscoalition.org. (2013). Getting the big idea: Concept-based teaching and learning [Handout]. https://semiscoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/getting-the-big-idea-handout.pdf .

Siew, N. M., & Mapeala, R. (2017). The effects of Thinking Maps-aided Problem-Based Learning on motivation towards science learning among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16 (3), 379–394. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol16/379-394.siew_jbse_vol.16_no.3.pdf .

Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer.

Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S. (2007). Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: Effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Academic Medicine, 82 (1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.acm.0000249963.93776.aa .

Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3 (1), 44–58.

Strong, R., Silver, H. F., & Robinson, A. (1995). Strengthening student engagement: What do students want. Educational Leadership, 53 (1), 8–12.

Summers, E. J., & Dickinson, G. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of project–based instruction and student achievement in high school social studies student achievement in high school social studies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6 (1), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1313 .

Sutton, P. S., & Knuth, R. (2017). A schoolwide investment in problem-based learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 99 (2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717734193 .

The Buck Institute for Education. (2018). PBL works . https://www.pblworks.org .

Tienken, C. H. (2020). Cracking the code of education reform: Creative compliance and ethical leadership . Corwin.

Virginia Department of Education (VDOE). (2019a). Profile of a Virginia graduate . http://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/graduation/profile-grad/index.shtml .

Virginia Department of Education (VDOE). (2019b). Virginia’s 5 C’s . http://www.virginiaisforlearners.virginia.gov/media-library/#:~:text=Students%20in%20every%20grade%20will,communication%2C%20collaboration%20and%20citizenship%20skills .

Wells, J. G. (2016). I-STEM ed exemplar: Implementation of the PIRPOSAL Model. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76 (2), 16–23.

Wilson, B. G. (2012). Constructivism in practical and historical context. In B. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Current trends in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 51–62). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Yaqinuddin, A. (2013). Problem-based learning as an instructional method. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan , 23 (1), 83–85. https://jcpsp.pk/archive/2013/Jan2013/18.pdf .

Yew, H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Professions Education, 2, 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004 .

Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112 (1), 12–19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Carroll County Public Schools, Virginia, VA, USA

Samantha S. Reed

Virginia Tech, Virginia, VA, USA

Carol A. Mullen

Grayson County Public Schools, Virginia, VA, USA

Emily T. Boyles

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol A. Mullen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Reed, S.S., Mullen, C.A., Boyles, E.T. (2021). A Review of Literature. In: Problem-Based Learning in Elementary School. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70598-5_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70598-5_2

Published : 14 March 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-70597-8

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-70598-5

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Problem-based learning: a review

Affiliations.

• 1 Foundation Year 2 Doctor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE.
• 2 Medical Student, Queen Mary University London, London.
• 3 Foundation Year 2 Doctor, Department of Acute Medicine, Royal London Hospital, London.
• 4 Consultant Chest Physician, Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London and Honorary Senior Lecturer, Department of Health Sciences Education, Queen Mary University London, London.
• PMID: 29111794
• DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.11.C167

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Towards a better medical curriculum. Dharmasaroja P. Dharmasaroja P. Med Educ. 2013 Jun;47(6):633. doi: 10.1111/medu.12135. Med Educ. 2013. PMID: 23662882 No abstract available.
• Studying published cases and the medical literature curriculum. Shanley PF, Kelly KC. Shanley PF, et al. Med Educ. 2008 May;42(5):521-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03054.x. Med Educ. 2008. PMID: 18412896 No abstract available.
• Problem-based learning: the confusion continues. Miflin B. Miflin B. Med Educ. 2004 Sep;38(9):923-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01920.x. Med Educ. 2004. PMID: 15327671 No abstract available.
• Do interprofessional education and problem-based learning work together? Thompson C. Thompson C. Clin Teach. 2010 Sep;7(3):197-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00381.x. Clin Teach. 2010. PMID: 21134183
• Undergraduate medical education: comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Nandi PL, Chan JN, Chan CP, Chan P, Chan LP. Nandi PL, et al. Hong Kong Med J. 2000 Sep;6(3):301-6. Hong Kong Med J. 2000. PMID: 11025850 Review.
• The Second Life Metaverse and Its Usefulness in Medical Education After a Quarter of a Century. Sendra-Portero F, Lorenzo-Álvarez R, Rudolphi-Solero T, Ruiz-Gómez MJ. Sendra-Portero F, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 6;26:e59005. doi: 10.2196/59005. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39106480 Free PMC article. Review.
• Use of problem-based learning in orthopaedics education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Li T, Song R, Zhong W, Liao W, Hu J, Liu X, Wang F. Li T, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05244-1. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38459551 Free PMC article.
• Quarantining From Professional Identity: How Did COVID-19 Impact Professional Identity Formation in Undergraduate Medical Education? Rehman M, Khalid F, Sheth U, Al-Duaij L, Chow J, Azim A, Last N, Blissett S, Sibbald M. Rehman M, et al. Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Feb 20;13(1):130-140. doi: 10.5334/pme.1308. eCollection 2024. Perspect Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38406652 Free PMC article.
• Nursing students'experience of flipped classroom combined with problem-based learning in a paediatric nursing course: a qualitative study. Ni ZH, Huang J, Yang DP, Wang J. Ni ZH, et al. BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 2;23(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01744-z. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38308302 Free PMC article.
• Nephrology Partnership for Advancing Technology in Healthcare (N-PATH) program: the teachers' perspective. Lomonte C, Rossini M, Ibeas J, Forcella M, Ponikvar JB, Gallieni M, Russo R, Goumenos D, Tesar V, Hruskova Z, Roelofs J, Florquin S, Snoeijs M, Giusto A, Shemesh D, Rotmans J, Torra R, Wanner C, Gesualdo L. Lomonte C, et al. Clin Kidney J. 2023 Dec 8;17(1):sfad299. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad299. eCollection 2024 Jan. Clin Kidney J. 2023. PMID: 38213498 Free PMC article.

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources, other literature sources.

• scite Smart Citations

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.