essay on social issues poverty

Poverty Essay for Students and Children

500+ words essay on poverty essay.

“Poverty is the worst form of violence”. – Mahatma Gandhi.

How Poverty is Measured?

For measuring poverty United nations have devised two measures of poverty – Absolute & relative poverty.  Absolute poverty is used to measure poverty in developing countries like India. Relative poverty is used to measure poverty in developed countries like the USA. In absolute poverty, a line based on the minimum level of income has been created & is called a poverty line.  If per day income of a family is below this level, then it is poor or below the poverty line. If per day income of a family is above this level, then it is non-poor or above the poverty line. In India, the new poverty line is  Rs 32 in rural areas and Rs 47 in urban areas.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Causes of Poverty

According to the Noble prize winner South African leader, Nelson Mandela – “Poverty is not natural, it is manmade”. The above statement is true as the causes of poverty are generally man-made. There are various causes of poverty but the most important is population. Rising population is putting the burden on the resources & budget of countries. Governments are finding difficult to provide food, shelter & employment to the rising population.

The other causes are- lack of education, war, natural disaster, lack of employment, lack of infrastructure, political instability, etc. For instance- lack of employment opportunities makes a person jobless & he is not able to earn enough to fulfill the basic necessities of his family & becomes poor. Lack of education compels a person for less paying jobs & it makes him poorer. Lack of infrastructure means there are no industries, banks, etc. in a country resulting in lack of employment opportunities. Natural disasters like flood, earthquake also contribute to poverty.

In some countries, especially African countries like Somalia, a long period of civil war has made poverty widespread. This is because all the resources & money is being spent in war instead of public welfare. Countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc. are prone to natural disasters like cyclone, etc. These disasters occur every year causing poverty to rise.

Ill Effects of Poverty

Poverty affects the life of a poor family. A poor person is not able to take proper food & nutrition &his capacity to work reduces. Reduced capacity to work further reduces his income, making him poorer. Children from poor family never get proper schooling & proper nutrition. They have to work to support their family & this destroys their childhood. Some of them may also involve in crimes like theft, murder, robbery, etc. A poor person remains uneducated & is forced to live under unhygienic conditions in slums. There are no proper sanitation & drinking water facility in slums & he falls ill often &  his health deteriorates. A poor person generally dies an early death. So, all social evils are related to poverty.

Government Schemes to Remove Poverty

The government of India also took several measures to eradicate poverty from India. Some of them are – creating employment opportunities , controlling population, etc. In India, about 60% of the population is still dependent on agriculture for its livelihood. Government has taken certain measures to promote agriculture in India. The government constructed certain dams & canals in our country to provide easy availability of water for irrigation. Government has also taken steps for the cheap availability of seeds & farming equipment to promote agriculture. Government is also promoting farming of cash crops like cotton, instead of food crops. In cities, the government is promoting industrialization to create more jobs. Government has also opened  ‘Ration shops’. Other measures include providing free & compulsory education for children up to 14 years of age, scholarship to deserving students from a poor background, providing subsidized houses to poor people, etc.

Poverty is a social evil, we can also contribute to control it. For example- we can simply donate old clothes to poor people, we can also sponsor the education of a poor child or we can utilize our free time by teaching poor students. Remember before wasting food, somebody is still sleeping hungry.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

2.4 The Consequences of Poverty

Learning objectives.

• Describe the family and housing problems associated with poverty.
• Explain how poverty affects health and educational attainment.

Regardless of its causes, poverty has devastating consequences for the people who live in it. Much research conducted and/or analyzed by scholars, government agencies, and nonprofit organizations has documented the effects of poverty (and near poverty) on the lives of the poor (Lindsey, 2009; Moore, et. al., 2009; Ratcliffe & McKernan, 2010; Sanders, 2011). Many of these studies focus on childhood poverty, and these studies make it very clear that childhood poverty has lifelong consequences. In general, poor children are more likely to be poor as adults, more likely to drop out of high school, more likely to become a teenaged parent, and more likely to have employment problems. Although only 1 percent of children who are never poor end up being poor as young adults, 32 percent of poor children become poor as young adults (Ratcliffe & McKernan, 2010).

Poor children are more likely to have inadequate nutrition and to experience health, behavioral, and cognitive problems.

Kelly Short – Poverty: “Damaged Child,” Oklahoma City, OK, USA, 1936. (Colorized). – CC BY-SA 2.0.

A recent study used government data to follow children born between 1968 and 1975 until they were ages 30 to 37 (Duncan & Magnuson, 2011). The researchers compared individuals who lived in poverty in early childhood to those whose families had incomes at least twice the poverty line in early childhood. Compared to the latter group, adults who were poor in early childhood

• had completed two fewer years of schooling on the average;
• had incomes that were less than half of those earned by adults who had wealthier childhoods;
• received $826 more annually in food stamps on the average;
• were almost three times more likely to report being in poor health;
• were twice as likely to have been arrested (males only); and
• were five times as likely to have borne a child (females only).

We discuss some of the major specific consequences of poverty here and will return to them in later chapters.

Family Problems

The poor are at greater risk for family problems, including divorce and domestic violence. As Chapter 9 “Sexual Behavior” explains, a major reason for many of the problems families experience is stress. Even in families that are not poor, running a household can cause stress, children can cause stress, and paying the bills can cause stress. Families that are poor have more stress because of their poverty, and the ordinary stresses of family life become even more intense in poor families. The various kinds of family problems thus happen more commonly in poor families than in wealthier families. Compounding this situation, when these problems occur, poor families have fewer resources than wealthier families to deal with these problems.

Children and Our Future

Getting under Children’s Skin: The Biological Effects of Childhood Poverty

As the text discusses, childhood poverty often has lifelong consequences. Poor children are more likely to be poor when they become adults, and they are at greater risk for antisocial behavior when young, and for unemployment, criminal behavior, and other problems when they reach adolescence and young adulthood.

According to growing evidence, one reason poverty has these consequences is that it has certain neural effects on poor children that impair their cognitive abilities and thus their behavior and learning potential. As Greg J. Duncan and Katherine Magnuson (Duncan & Magnuson, 2011, p. 23) observe, “Emerging research in neuroscience and developmental psychology suggests that poverty early in a child’s life may be particularly harmful because the astonishingly rapid development of young children’s brains leaves them sensitive (and vulnerable) to environmental conditions.”

In short, poverty can change the way the brain develops in young children. The major reason for this effect is stress. Children growing up in poverty experience multiple stressful events: neighborhood crime and drug use; divorce, parental conflict, and other family problems, including abuse and neglect by their parents; parental financial problems and unemployment; physical and mental health problems of one or more family members; and so forth. Their great levels of stress in turn affect their bodies in certain harmful ways. As two poverty scholars note, “It’s not just that poverty-induced stress is mentally taxing. If it’s experienced early enough in childhood, it can in fact get ‘under the skin’ and change the way in which the body copes with the environment and the way in which the brain develops. These deep, enduring, and sometimes irreversible physiological changes are the very human price of running a high-poverty society” (Grusky & Wimer, 2011, p. 2).

One way poverty gets “under children’s skin” is as follows (Evans, et. al., 2011). Poor children’s high levels of stress produce unusually high levels of stress hormones such as cortisol and higher levels of blood pressure. Because these high levels impair their neural development, their memory and language development skills suffer. This result in turn affects their behavior and learning potential. For other physiological reasons, high levels of stress also affect the immune system, so that poor children are more likely to develop various illnesses during childhood and to have high blood pressure and other health problems when they grow older, and cause other biological changes that make poor children more likely to end up being obese and to have drug and alcohol problems.

The policy implications of the scientific research on childhood poverty are clear. As public health scholar Jack P. Shonkoff (Shonkoff, 2011) explains, “Viewing this scientific evidence within a biodevelopmental framework points to the particular importance of addressing the needs of our most disadvantaged children at the earliest ages.” Duncan and Magnuson (Duncan & Magnuson, 2011) agree that “greater policy attention should be given to remediating situations involving deep and persistent poverty occurring early in childhood.” To reduce poverty’s harmful physiological effects on children, Skonkoff advocates efforts to promote strong, stable relationships among all members of poor families; to improve the quality of the home and neighborhood physical environments in which poor children grow; and to improve the nutrition of poor children. Duncan and Magnuson call for more generous income transfers to poor families with young children and note that many European democracies provide many kinds of support to such families. The recent scientific evidence on early childhood poverty underscores the importance of doing everything possible to reduce the harmful effects of poverty during the first few years of life.

Health, Illness, and Medical Care

The poor are also more likely to have many kinds of health problems, including infant mortality, earlier adulthood mortality, and mental illness, and they are also more likely to receive inadequate medical care. Poor children are more likely to have inadequate nutrition and, partly for this reason, to suffer health, behavioral, and cognitive problems. These problems in turn impair their ability to do well in school and land stable employment as adults, helping to ensure that poverty will persist across generations. Many poor people are uninsured or underinsured, at least until the US health-care reform legislation of 2010 takes full effect a few years from now, and many have to visit health clinics that are overcrowded and understaffed.

As Chapter 12 “Work and the Economy” discusses, it is unclear how much of poor people’s worse health stems from their lack of money and lack of good health care versus their own behavior such as smoking and eating unhealthy diets. Regardless of the exact reasons, however, the fact remains that poor health is a major consequence of poverty. According to recent research, this fact means that poverty is responsible for almost 150,000 deaths annually, a figure about equal to the number of deaths from lung cancer (Bakalar, 2011).

Poor children typically go to rundown schools with inadequate facilities where they receive inadequate schooling. They are much less likely than wealthier children to graduate from high school or to go to college. Their lack of education in turn restricts them and their own children to poverty, once again helping to ensure a vicious cycle of continuing poverty across generations. As Chapter 10 “The Changing Family” explains, scholars debate whether the poor school performance of poor children stems more from the inadequacy of their schools and schooling versus their own poverty. Regardless of exactly why poor children are more likely to do poorly in school and to have low educational attainment, these educational problems are another major consequence of poverty.

Housing and Homelessness

The poor are, not surprisingly, more likely to be homeless than the nonpoor but also more likely to live in dilapidated housing and unable to buy their own homes. Many poor families spend more than half their income on rent, and they tend to live in poor neighborhoods that lack job opportunities, good schools, and other features of modern life that wealthier people take for granted. The lack of adequate housing for the poor remains a major national problem. Even worse is outright homelessness. An estimated 1.6 million people, including more than 300,000 children, are homeless at least part of the year (Lee, et. al., 2010).

Crime and Victimization

As Chapter 7 “Alcohol and Other Drugs” discusses, poor (and near poor) people account for the bulk of our street crime (homicide, robbery, burglary, etc.), and they also account for the bulk of victims of street crime. That chapter will outline several reasons for this dual connection between poverty and street crime, but they include the deep frustration and stress of living in poverty and the fact that many poor people live in high-crime neighborhoods. In such neighborhoods, children are more likely to grow up under the influence of older peers who are already in gangs or otherwise committing crime, and people of any age are more likely to become crime victims. Moreover, because poor and near-poor people are more likely to commit street crime, they also comprise most of the people arrested for street crimes, convicted of street crime, and imprisoned for street crime. Most of the more than 2 million people now in the nation’s prisons and jails come from poor or near-poor backgrounds. Criminal behavior and criminal victimization, then, are other major consequences of poverty.

Lessons from Other Societies

Poverty and Poverty Policy in Other Western Democracies

To compare international poverty rates, scholars commonly use a measure of the percentage of households in a nation that receive less than half of the nation’s median household income after taxes and cash transfers from the government. In data from the late 2000s, 17.3 percent of US households lived in poverty as defined by this measure. By comparison, other Western democracies had the rates depicted in the figure that follows. The average poverty rate of the nations in the figure excluding the United States is 9.5 percent. The US rate is thus almost twice as high as the average for all the other democracies.

This graph illustrates the poverty rates in western democracies (i.e., the percentage of persons living with less than half of the median household income) as of the late 2000s

Source: Data from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Society at a glance 2011: OECD social indicators. Retrieved July 23, 2011, from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/soc_glance-2011-en/06/02/index.html;jsessionid=erdqhbpb203ea.epsilon?contentType=&itemId=/content/chapter/soc_glance-2011-17-en&containerItemId=/content/se .

Why is there so much more poverty in the United States than in its Western counterparts? Several differences between the United States and the other nations stand out (Brady, 2009; Russell, 2011). First, other Western nations have higher minimum wages and stronger labor unions than the United States has, and these lead to incomes that help push people above poverty. Second, these other nations spend a much greater proportion of their gross domestic product on social expenditures (income support and social services such as child-care subsidies and housing allowances) than does the United States. As sociologist John Iceland (Iceland, 2006) notes, “Such countries often invest heavily in both universal benefits, such as maternity leave, child care, and medical care, and in promoting work among [poor] families…The United States, in comparison with other advanced nations, lacks national health insurance, provides less publicly supported housing, and spends less on job training and job creation.” Block and colleagues agree: “These other countries all take a more comprehensive government approach to combating poverty, and they assume that it is caused by economic and structural factors rather than bad behavior” (Block et, al., 2006).

The experience of the United Kingdom provides a striking contrast between the effectiveness of the expansive approach used in other wealthy democracies and the inadequacy of the American approach. In 1994, about 30 percent of British children lived in poverty; by 2009, that figure had fallen by more than half to 12 percent. Meanwhile, the US 2009 child poverty rate, was almost 21 percent.

Britain used three strategies to reduce its child poverty rate and to help poor children and their families in other ways. First, it induced more poor parents to work through a series of new measures, including a national minimum wage higher than its US counterpart and various tax savings for low-income workers. Because of these measures, the percentage of single parents who worked rose from 45 percent in 1997 to 57 percent in 2008. Second, Britain increased child welfare benefits regardless of whether a parent worked. Third, it increased paid maternity leave from four months to nine months, implemented two weeks of paid paternity leave, established universal preschool (which both helps children’s cognitive abilities and makes it easier for parents to afford to work), increased child-care aid, and made it possible for parents of young children to adjust their working hours to their parental responsibilities (Waldfogel, 2010). While the British child poverty rate fell dramatically because of these strategies, the US child poverty rate stagnated.

In short, the United States has so much more poverty than other democracies in part because it spends so much less than they do on helping the poor. The United States certainly has the wealth to follow their example, but it has chosen not to do so, and a high poverty rate is the unfortunate result. As the Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman (2006, p. A25) summarizes this lesson, “Government truly can be a force for good. Decades of propaganda have conditioned many Americans to assume that government is always incompetent…But the [British experience has] shown that a government that seriously tries to reduce poverty can achieve a lot.”

Key Takeaways

• Poor people are more likely to have several kinds of family problems, including divorce and family conflict.
• Poor people are more likely to have several kinds of health problems.
• Children growing up in poverty are less likely to graduate high school or go to college, and they are more likely to commit street crime.

For Your Review

• Write a brief essay that summarizes the consequences of poverty.
• Why do you think poor children are more likely to develop health problems?

Bakalar, N. (2011, July 4). Researchers link deaths to social ills. New York Times , p. D5.

Block, F., Korteweg, A. C., & Woodward, K. (2006). The compassion gap in American poverty policy. Contexts, 5 (2), 14–20.

Brady, D. (2009). Rich democracies, poor people: How politics explain poverty . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2011, winter). The long reach of early childhood poverty. Pathways: A Magazine on Poverty, Inequality, and Social Policy , 22–27.

Evans, G. W., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (2011, winter). Stressing out the poor: Chronic physiological stress and the income-achievement gap. Pathways: A Magazine on Poverty, Inequality, and Social Policy , 16–21.

Grusky, D., & Wimer, C.(Eds.). (2011, winter). Editors’ note. Pathways: A Magazine on Poverty, Inequality, and Social Policy , 2.

Iceland, J. (2006). Poverty in America: A handbook . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Krugman, P. (Krugman, 2006). Helping the poor, the British way. New York Times , p. A25.

Lee, B., Tyler, K. A., & Wright, J. D. ( 2010). The new homelessness revisited. Annual Review of Sociology, 36 , 501–521.

Lindsey, D. (2009). Child poverty and inequality: Securing a better future for America’s children . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Moore, K. A., Redd, Z., Burkhauser, M., Mbawa, K., & Collins, A. (2009). Children in poverty: Trends, consequences, and policy options . Washington, DC: Child Trends. Retrieved from http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2009_04_07_RB_ChildreninPoverty.pdf .

Ratcliffe, C., & McKernan, S.-M. (2010). Childhood poverty persistence: Facts and consequences . Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

Russell, J. W. ( 2011). Double standard: Social policy in Europe and the United States (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Sanders, L. (2011). Neuroscience exposes pernicious effects of poverty. Science News, 179 (3), 32.

Shonkoff, J. P. (2011, winter). Building a foundation for prosperity on the science of early childhood development. Pathways: A Magazine on Poverty, Inequality, and Social Policy , 10–14.

Waldfogel, J. (2010). Britain’s war on poverty . New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Social Problems Copyright © 2015 by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

7 Essays About Poverty: Example Essays and Prompts

Essays about poverty give valuable insight into the economic situation that we share globally. Read our guide with poverty essay examples and prompts for your paper.

In the US, the official poverty rate in 2022 was 11.5 percent, with 37.9 million people living below the poverty line. With a global pandemic, cost of living crisis, and climate change on the rise, we’ve seen poverty increase due to various factors. As many of us face adversity daily, we can look to essays about poverty from some of the world’s greatest speakers for inspiration and guidance.

There is nothing but a lack of social vision to prevent us from paying an adequate wage to every American citizen whether he be a hospital worker, laundry worker, maid or day laborer. There is nothing except shortsightedness to prevent us from guaranteeing an annual minimum—and livable—income for every American family. Martin Luther King Jr., Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community?

Writing a poverty essay can be challenging due to the many factors contributing to poverty and the knock-on effects of living below the poverty line . For example, homelessness among low-income individuals stems from many different causes.

It’s important to note that poverty exists beyond the US, with many developing countries living in extreme poverty without access to essentials like clean water and housing. For help with your essays, check out our round-up of the best essay checkers .

Essays About Poverty: Top Examples

1. pensioner poverty: fear of rise over decades as uk under-40s wealth falls, 2. the surprising poverty levels across the u.s., 3. why poverty persists in america, 4. post-pandemic poverty is rising in america’s suburbs.

• 5. The Basic Facts About Children in Poverty
• 6. The State of America’s Children 
• 7. COVID-19: This is how many Americans now live below the poverty line

10 Poverty Essay Topics

1. the causes of poverty, 2. the negative effects of poverty, 3. how countries can reduce poverty rates, 4. the basic necessities and poverty, 5. how disabilities can lead to poverty, 6. how the cycle of poverty unfolds , 7. universal basic income and its relationship to poverty, 8. interview someone who has experience living in poverty, 9. the impact of the criminal justice system on poverty, 10. the different ways to create affordable housing.

There is growing concern about increasing pensioner poverty in the UK in the coming decades. Due to financial challenges like the cost of living crisis, rent increases, and the COVID-19 pandemic, under 40s have seen their finances shrink.

Osborne discusses the housing wealth gap in this article, where many under the 40s currently pay less in a pension due to rent prices. While this means they will have less pension available, they will also retire without owning a home, resulting in less personal wealth than previous generations. Osborne delves into the causes and gaps in wealth between generations in this in-depth essay.

“Those under-40s have already been identified as  facing the biggest hit from rising mortgage rates , and last week a study by the financial advice firm Hargreaves Lansdown found that almost a third of 18- to 34-year-olds had stopped or cut back on their pension contributions in order to save money.” Hilary Osborne,  The Guardian

In this 2023 essay, Jeremy Ney looks at the poverty levels across the US, stating that poverty has had the largest one-year increase in history. According to the most recent census, child poverty has more than doubled from 2021 to 2022.

Ney states that the expiration of government support and inflation has created new financial challenges for US families. With the increased cost of living and essential items like food and housing sharply increasing, more and more families have fallen below the poverty line. Throughout this essay, Ney displays statistics and data showing the wealth changes across states, ethnic groups, and households.

“Poverty in America reflects the inequality that plagues U.S. households. While certain regions have endured this pain much more than others, this new rising trend may spell ongoing challenges for even more communities.” Jeremy Ney,  TIME

In this New York Times article, a Pulitzer Prize-winning sociologist explores why poverty exists in North America.

The American poor have access to cheap, mass-produced goods, as every American does. But that doesn’t mean they can access what matters most. Matthew Desmond,  The New York Times

The U.S. Census Bureau recently released its annual data on poverty, revealing contrasting trends for 2022. While one set of findings indicated that the overall number of Americans living in poverty remained stable compared to the previous two years, another survey highlighted a concerning increase in child poverty. The rate of child poverty in the U.S. doubled from 2021 to 2022, a spike attributed mainly to the cessation of the expanded child tax credit following the pandemic. These varied outcomes underscore the Census Bureau’s multifaceted methods to measure poverty.

“The nation’s suburbs accounted for the majority of increases in the poor population following the onset of the pandemic” Elizabeth Kneebone and Alan Berube,  Brookings

5.  The Basic Facts About Children in Poverty

Nearly 11 million children are living in poverty in America. This essay explores ow the crisis reached this point—and what steps must be taken to solve it.

“In America, nearly 11 million children are poor. That’s 1 in 7 kids, who make up almost one-third of all people living in poverty in this country.” Areeba Haider,  Center for American Progress

6.  The State of America’s Children  

This essay articles how, despite advancements, children continue to be the most impoverished demographic in the U.S., with particular subgroups — such as children of color, those under five, offspring of single mothers, and children residing in the South — facing the most severe poverty levels.

“Growing up in poverty has wide-ranging, sometimes lifelong, effects on children, putting them at a much higher risk of experiencing behavioral, social, emotional, and health challenges. Childhood poverty also plays an instrumental role in impairing a child’s ability and capacity to learn, build skills, and succeed academically.” Children’s Defense Fund

7.  COVID-19: This is how many Americans now live below the poverty line

This essay explores how the economic repercussions of the coronavirus pandemic 2020 led to a surge in U.S. poverty rates, with unemployment figures reaching unprecedented heights. The writer provides data confirming that individuals at the lowest economic strata bore the brunt of these challenges, indicating that the recession might have exacerbated income disparities, further widening the chasm between the affluent and the underprivileged.

“Poverty in the U.S. increased in 2020 as the coronavirus pandemic hammered the economy and unemployment soared. Those at the bottom of the economic ladder were hit hardest, new figures confirm, suggesting that the recession may have widened the gap between the rich and the poor.” Elena Delavega,  World Econmic Forum

If you’re tasked with writing an essay about poverty, consider using the below topics. They offer pointers for outlining and planning an essay about this challenging topic.

One of the most specific poverty essay topics to address involves the causes of poverty. You can craft an essay to examine the most common causes of extreme poverty. Here are a few topics you might want to include:

• Racial discrimination, particularly among African Americans, has been a common cause of poverty throughout American history. Discrimination and racism can make it hard for people to get the education they need, making it nearly impossible to get a job.
• A lack of access to adequate health care can also lead to poverty. When people do not have access to healthcare, they are more likely to get sick. This could make it hard for them to go to work while also leading to major medical bills.
• Inadequate food and water can lead to poverty as well. If people’s basic needs aren’t met, they focus on finding food and water instead of getting an education they can use to find a better job.

These are just a few of the most common causes of poverty you might want to highlight in your essay. These topics could help people see why some people are more likely to become impoverished than others. You might also be interested in these essays about poverty .

Poverty affects everyone, and the impacts of an impoverished lifestyle are very real. Furthermore, the disparities when comparing adult poverty to child poverty are also significant. This opens the doors to multiple possible essay topics. Here are a few points to include:

• When children live in poverty, their development is stunted. For example, they might not be able to get to school on time due to a lack of transportation, making it hard for them to keep up with their peers. Child poverty also leads to malnutrition, which can stunt their development.
• Poverty can impact familial relationships as well. For example, members of the same family could fight for limited resources, making it hard for family members to bond. In addition, malnutrition can stunt the growth of children.
• As a side effect of poverty, people have difficulty finding a safe place to live. This creates a challenging environment for everyone involved, and it is even harder for children to grow and develop.
• When poverty leads to homelessness, it is hard for someone to get a job. They don’t have an address to use for physical communication, which leads to employment concerns.

These are just a few of the many side effects of poverty. Of course, these impacts are felt by people across the board, but it is not unusual for children to feel the effects of poverty that much more. You might also be interested in these essays about unemployment .

Different countries take different approaches to reduce the number of people living in poverty

The issue of poverty is a major human rights concern, and many countries explore poverty reduction strategies to improve people’s quality of life. You might want to examine different strategies that different countries are taking while also suggesting how some countries can do more. A few ways to write this essay include:

• Explore the poverty level in America, comparing it to the poverty level of a European country. Then, explore why different countries take different strategies.
• Compare the minimum wage in one state, such as New York, to the minimum wage in another state, such as Alabama. Why is it higher in one state? What does raising the minimum wage do to the cost of living?
• Highlight a few advocacy groups and nonprofit organizations actively lobbying their governments to do more for low-income families. Then, talk about why some efforts are more successful than others.

Different countries take different approaches to reduce the number of people living in poverty. Poverty within each country is such a broad topic that you could write a different essay on how poverty could be decreased within the country. For more, check out our list of simple essays topics for intermediate writers .

You could also write an essay on the necessities people need to survive. You could take a look at information published by the United Nations , which focuses on getting people out of the cycle of poverty across the globe. The social problem of poverty can be addressed by giving people the necessities they need to survive, particularly in rural areas. Here are some of the areas you might want to include:

• Affordable housing
• Fresh, healthy food and clean water
• Access to an affordable education
• Access to affordable healthcare

Giving everyone these necessities could significantly improve their well-being and get people out of absolute poverty. You might even want to talk about whether these necessities vary depending on where someone is living.

There are a lot of medical and social issues that contribute to poverty, and you could write about how disabilities contribute to poverty. This is one of the most important essay topics because people could be disabled through no fault of their own. Some of the issues you might want to address in this essay include:

• Talk about the road someone faces if they become disabled while serving overseas. What is it like for people to apply for benefits through the Veterans’ Administration?
• Discuss what happens if someone becomes disabled while at work. What is it like for someone to pursue disability benefits if they are hurt doing a blue-collar job instead of a desk job?
• Research and discuss the experiences of disabled people and how their disability impacts their financial situation.

People who are disabled need to have money to survive for many reasons, such as the inability to work, limitations at home, and medical expenses. A lack of money, in this situation, can lead to a dangerous cycle that can make it hard for someone to be financially stable and live a comfortable lifestyle.

Many people talk about the cycle of poverty, yet many aren’t entirely sure what this means or what it entails. A few key points you should address in this essay include:

• When someone is born into poverty, income inequality can make it hard to get an education.
• A lack of education makes it hard for someone to get into a good school, which gives them the foundation they need to compete for a good job. 
• A lack of money can make it hard for someone to afford college, even if they get into a good school.
• Without attending a good college, it can be hard for someone to get a good job. This makes it hard for someone to support themselves or their families. 
• Without a good paycheck, it is nearly impossible for someone to keep their children out of poverty, limiting upward mobility into the middle class.

The problem of poverty is a positive feedback loop. It can be nearly impossible for those who live this every day to escape. Therefore, you might want to explore a few initiatives that could break the cycle of world poverty and explore other measures that could break this feedback loop.

Many business people and politicians have floated the idea of a universal basic income to give people the basic resources they need to survive. While this hasn’t gotten a lot of serious traction, you could write an essay to shed light on this idea. A few points to hit on include:

• What does a universal basic income mean, and how is it distributed?
• Some people are concerned about the impact this would have on taxes. How would this be paid for?
• What is the minimum amount of money someone would need to stay out of poverty? Is it different in different areas?
• What are a few of the biggest reasons major world governments haven’t passed this?

This is one of the best essay examples because it gives you a lot of room to be creative. However, there hasn’t been a concrete structure for implementing this plan, so you might want to afford one.

Another interesting topic you might want to explore is interviewing someone living in poverty or who has been impoverished. While you can talk about statistics all day, they won’t be as powerful as interviewing someone who has lived that life. A few questions you might want to ask during your interview include:

• What was it like growing up?
• How has living in poverty made it hard for you to get a job?
• What do you feel people misunderstand about those who live in poverty?
• When you need to find a meal, do you have a place you go to? Or is it somewhere different every day?
• What do you think is the main contributor to people living in poverty?

Remember that you can also craft different questions depending on your responses. You might want to let the interviewee read the essay when you are done to ensure all the information is accurate and correct.

The criminal justice system and poverty tend to go hand in hand. People with criminal records are more likely to be impoverished for several reasons. You might want to write an essay that hits on some of these points:

• Discuss the discriminatory practices of the criminal justice system both as they relate to socioeconomic status and as they relate to race.
• Explore just how hard it is for someone to get a job if they have a criminal record. Discuss how this might contribute to a life of poverty.
• Dive into how this creates a positive feedback loop. For example, when someone cannot get a job due to a criminal record, they might have to steal to survive, which worsens the issue.
• Review what the criminal justice system might be like for someone with resources when compared to someone who cannot afford to hire expert witnesses or pay for a good attorney.

You might want to include a few examples of disparate sentences for people in different socioeconomic situations to back up your points. 

Affordable housing can make a major difference when someone is trying to escape poverty

Many poverty-related problems could be reduced if people had access to affordable housing. While the cost of housing has increased dramatically in the United States , some initiatives exist to create affordable housing. Here are a few points to include:

• Talk about public programs that offer affordable housing to people from disadvantaged backgrounds.
• Discuss private programs, such as Habitat for Humanity , doing similar things.
• Review the positive impacts that stable housing has on both adults and children.
• Dive into other measures local and federal governments could take to provide more affordable housing for people.

There are a lot of political and social angles to address with this essay, so you might want to consider spreading this out across multiple papers. Affordable housing can make a major difference when trying to escape poverty. If you want to learn more, check out our essay writing tips !

Why poverty is not a personal choice, but a reflection of society

Research Investigator of Psychiatry, Public Health, and Poverty Solutions, University of Michigan

Disclosure statement

Shervin Assari does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

University of Michigan provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation US.

View all partners

As the Senate prepares to modify its version of the health care bill, now is a good time to back up and examine why we as a nation are so divided about providing health care, especially to the poor.

I believe one reason the United States is cutting spending on health insurance and safety nets that protect poor and marginalized people is because of American culture, which overemphasizes individual responsibility. Our culture does this to the point that it ignores the effect of root causes shaped by society and beyond the control of the individual. How laypeople define and attribute poverty may not be that much different from the way U.S. policymakers in the Senate see poverty.

As someone who studies poverty solutions and social and health inequalities, I am convinced by the academic literature that the biggest reason for poverty is how a society is structured. Without structural changes, it may be very difficult if not impossible to eliminate disparities and poverty.

Social structure

About 13.5 percent of Americans are living in poverty. Many of these people do not have insurance, and efforts to help them gain insurance, be it through Medicaid or private insurance, have been stymied. Medicaid provides insurance for the disabled, people in nursing homes and the poor.

Four states recently asked the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for permission to require Medicaid recipients in their states who are not disabled or elderly to work.

This request is reflective of the fact that many Americans believe that poverty is, by and large, the result of laziness , immorality and irresponsibility.

In fact, poverty and other social miseries are in large part due to social structure , which is how society functions at a macro level. Some societal issues, such as racism, sexism and segregation, constantly cause disparities in education, employment and income for marginalized groups. The majority group naturally has a head start, relative to groups that deal with a wide range of societal barriers on a daily basis. This is what I mean by structural causes of poverty and inequality.

Poverty: Not just a state of mind

We have all heard that the poor and minorities need only make better choices – work hard, stay in school, get married, do not have children before they can afford them. If they did all this, they wouldn’t be poor.

Just a few weeks ago, Housing Secretary Ben Carson called poverty “ a state of mind .” At the same time, his budget to help low-income households could be cut by more than US$6 billion next year.

This is an example of a simplistic view toward the complex social phenomenon. It is minimizing the impact of a societal issue caused by structure – macro‐level labor market and societal conditions – on individuals’ behavior. Such claims also ignore a large body of sociological science.

American independence

Americans have one of the most independent cultures on Earth. A majority of Americans define people in terms of internal attributes such as choices , abilities, values, preferences, decisions and traits.

This is very different from interdependent cultures , such as eastern Asian countries where people are seen mainly in terms of their environment, context and relationships with others.

A direct consequence of independent mindsets and cognitive models is that one may ignore all the historical and environmental conditions, such as slavery, segregation and discrimination against women, that contribute to certain outcomes. When we ignore the historical context, it is easier to instead attribute an unfavorable outcome, such as poverty, to the person.

Views shaped by politics

Many Americans view poverty as an individual phenomenon and say that it’s primarily their own fault that people are poor. The alternative view is that poverty is a structural phenomenon. From this viewpoint, people are in poverty because they find themselves in holes in the economic system that deliver them inadequate income.

The fact is that people move in and out of poverty. Research has shown that 45 percent of poverty spells last no more than a year, 70 percent last no more than three years and only 12 percent stretch beyond a decade.

The Panel Study of Income Dynamics ( PSID ), a 50-year longitudinal study of 18,000 Americans, has shown that around four in 10 adults experience an entire year of poverty from the ages of 25 to 60. The last Survey of Income and Program Participation ( SIPP ), a longitudinal survey conducted by the U.S. Census, had about one-third of Americans in episodic poverty at some point in a three-year period, but just 3.5 percent in episodic poverty for all three years.

Why calling the poor ‘lazy’ is victim blaming

If one believes that poverty is related to historical and environmental events and not just to an individual, we should be careful about blaming the poor for their fates.

Victim blaming occurs when the victim of a crime or any wrongful act is held entirely or partially responsible for the harm that befell them. It is a common psychological and societal phenomenon. Victimology has shown that humans have a tendency to perceive victims at least partially responsible . This is true even in rape cases, where there is a considerable tendency to blame victims and is true particularly if the victim and perpetrator know each other.

I believe all our lives could be improved if we considered the structural influences as root causes of social problems such as poverty and inequality. Perhaps then, we could more easily agree on solutions.

• Social mobility
• Homelessness
• Health disparities
• Health gaps
• US Senate health care bill
• US health care reform

Quantitative Analyst

Director of STEM

Community member - Training Delivery and Development Committee (Volunteer part-time)

Chief Executive Officer

Head of Evidence to Action

Why Poverty Persists in America

A Pulitzer Prize-winning sociologist offers a new explanation for an intractable problem.

A mother and son living in a Walmart parking lot in North Dakota in 2012. Credit... Eugene Richards

Supported by

• Share full article

By Matthew Desmond

• Published March 9, 2023 Updated April 3, 2023

In the past 50 years, scientists have mapped the entire human genome and eradicated smallpox. Here in the United States, infant-mortality rates and deaths from heart disease have fallen by roughly 70 percent, and the average American has gained almost a decade of life. Climate change was recognized as an existential threat. The internet was invented.

On the problem of poverty, though, there has been no real improvement — just a long stasis. As estimated by the federal government’s poverty line, 12.6 percent of the U.S. population was poor in 1970; two decades later, it was 13.5 percent; in 2010, it was 15.1 percent; and in 2019, it was 10.5 percent. To graph the share of Americans living in poverty over the past half-century amounts to drawing a line that resembles gently rolling hills. The line curves slightly up, then slightly down, then back up again over the years, staying steady through Democratic and Republican administrations, rising in recessions and falling in boom years.

What accounts for this lack of progress? It cannot be chalked up to how the poor are counted: Different measures spit out the same embarrassing result. When the government began reporting the Supplemental Poverty Measure in 2011, designed to overcome many of the flaws of the Official Poverty Measure, including not accounting for regional differences in costs of living and government benefits, the United States officially gained three million more poor people. Possible reductions in poverty from counting aid like food stamps and tax benefits were more than offset by recognizing how low-income people were burdened by rising housing and health care costs.

The American poor have access to cheap, mass-produced goods, as every American does. But that doesn’t mean they can access what matters most.

Any fair assessment of poverty must confront the breathtaking march of material progress. But the fact that standards of living have risen across the board doesn’t mean that poverty itself has fallen. Forty years ago, only the rich could afford cellphones. But cellphones have become more affordable over the past few decades, and now most Americans have one, including many poor people. This has led observers like Ron Haskins and Isabel Sawhill, senior fellows at the Brookings Institution, to assert that “access to certain consumer goods,” like TVs, microwave ovens and cellphones, shows that “the poor are not quite so poor after all.”

No, it doesn’t. You can’t eat a cellphone. A cellphone doesn’t grant you stable housing, affordable medical and dental care or adequate child care. In fact, as things like cellphones have become cheaper, the cost of the most necessary of life’s necessities, like health care and rent, has increased. From 2000 to 2022 in the average American city, the cost of fuel and utilities increased by 115 percent. The American poor, living as they do in the center of global capitalism, have access to cheap, mass-produced goods, as every American does. But that doesn’t mean they can access what matters most. As Michael Harrington put it 60 years ago: “It is much easier in the United States to be decently dressed than it is to be decently housed, fed or doctored.”

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

Advertisement

5 Essays About Poverty Everyone Should Know

Poverty is one of the driving forces of inequality in the world. Between 1990-2015, much progress was made. The number of people living on less than $1.90 went from 36% to 10%. However, according to the World Bank , the COVID-19 pandemic represents a serious problem that disproportionately impacts the poor. Research released in February of 2020 shows that by 2030, up to ⅔ of the “global extreme poor” will be living in conflict-affected and fragile economies. Poverty will remain a major human rights issue for decades to come. Here are five essays about the issue that everyone should know:

“We need an economic bill of rights” –  Martin Luther King Jr.

The Guardian published an abridged version of this essay in 2018, which was originally released in Look magazine just after Dr. King was killed. In this piece, Dr. King explains why an economic bill of rights is necessary. He points out that while mass unemployment within the black community is a “social problem,” it’s a “depression” in the white community. An economic bill of rights would give a job to everyone who wants one and who can work. It would also give an income to those who can’t work. Dr. King affirms his commitment to non-violence. He’s fully aware that tensions are high. He quotes a spiritual, writing “timing is winding up.” Even while the nation progresses, poverty is getting worse.

This essay was reprinted and abridged in The Guardian in an arrangement with The Heirs to the Estate of Martin Luther King. Jr. The most visible representative of the Civil Rights Movement beginning in 1955, Dr. King was assassinated in 1968. His essays and speeches remain timely.

“How Poverty Can Follow Children Into Adulthood” – Priyanka Boghani

This article is from 2017, but it’s more relevant than ever because it was written when 2012 was the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. That’s no longer the case. In 2012, around ¼ American children were in poverty. Five years later, children were still more likely than adults to be poor. This is especially true for children of colour. Consequences of poverty include anxiety, hunger, and homelessness. This essay also looks at the long-term consequences that come from growing up in poverty. A child can develop health problems that affect them in adulthood. Poverty can also harm a child’s brain development. Being aware of how poverty affects children and follows them into adulthood is essential as the world deals with the economic fallout from the pandemic.

Priyanka Boghani is a journalist at PBS Frontline. She focuses on U.S. foreign policy, humanitarian crises, and conflicts in the Middle East. She also assists in managing Frontline’s social accounts.

“5 Reasons COVID-19 Will Impact the Fight to End Extreme Poverty” – Leah Rodriguez

For decades, the UN has attempted to end extreme poverty. In the face of the novel coronavirus outbreak, new challenges threaten the fight against poverty. In this essay, Dr. Natalie Linos, a Harvard social epidemiologist, urges the world to have a “social conversation” about how the disease impacts poverty and inequality. If nothing is done, it’s unlikely that the UN will meet its Global Goals by 2030. Poverty and COVID-19 intersect in five key ways. For one, low-income people are more vulnerable to disease. They also don’t have equal access to healthcare or job stability. This piece provides a clear, concise summary of why this outbreak is especially concerning for the global poor.

Leah Rodriguez’s writing at Global Citizen focuses on women, girls, water, and sanitation. She’s also worked as a web producer and homepage editor for New York Magazine’s The Cut.

“Climate apartheid”: World’s poor to suffer most from disasters” – Al Jazeera and news Agencies

The consequences of climate change are well-known to experts like Philip Alston, the special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. In 2019, he submitted a report to the UN Human Rights Council sounding the alarm on how climate change will devastate the poor. While the wealthy will be able to pay their way out of devastation, the poor will not. This will end up creating a “climate apartheid.” Alston states that if climate change isn’t addressed, it will undo the last five decades of progress in poverty education, as well as global health and development .

“Nickel and Dimed: On (not) getting by in America” – Barbara Ehrenreich

In this excerpt from her book Nickel and Dimed, Ehrenreich describes her experience choosing to live undercover as an “unskilled worker” in the US. She wanted to investigate the impact the 1996 welfare reform act had on the working poor. Released in 2001, the events take place between the spring of 1998 and the summer of 2000. Ehrenreich decided to live in a town close to her “real life” and finds a place to live and a job. She has her eyes opened to the challenges and “special costs” of being poor. In 2019, The Guardian ranked the book 13th on their list of 100 best books of the 21st century.

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 21 books and an activist. She’s worked as an award-winning columnist and essayist.

You may also like

13 Facts about Child Labor

Environmental Racism 101: Definition, Examples, Ways to Take Action

11 Examples of Systemic Injustices in the US

Women’s Rights 101: History, Examples, Activists

What is Social Activism?

15 Inspiring Movies about Activism

15 Examples of Civil Disobedience

Academia in Times of Genocide: Why are Students Across the World Protesting?

Pinkwashing 101: Definition, History, Examples

15 Inspiring Quotes for Black History Month

10 Inspiring Ways Women Are Fighting for Equality

15 Trusted Charities Fighting for Clean Water

About the author, emmaline soken-huberty.

Emmaline Soken-Huberty is a freelance writer based in Portland, Oregon. She started to become interested in human rights while attending college, eventually getting a concentration in human rights and humanitarianism. LGBTQ+ rights, women’s rights, and climate change are of special concern to her. In her spare time, she can be found reading or enjoying Oregon’s natural beauty with her husband and dog.

Presentations made painless

• Get Premium

108 Social Issues Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Inside This Article

Social issues are complex and multifaceted problems that affect individuals, communities, and societies as a whole. These issues can range from poverty and inequality to discrimination and environmental degradation. Writing an essay on a social issue can be a daunting task, but it can also be a rewarding experience that allows you to explore and analyze important topics that impact the world around you.

To help you get started, here are 108 social issues essay topic ideas and examples that you can use as inspiration for your next writing assignment:

• The impact of social media on mental health
• Income inequality and its effects on society
• Police brutality and the Black Lives Matter movement
• The rise of fake news and its impact on democracy
• Gender inequality in the workplace
• Climate change and its effects on vulnerable communities
• The opioid crisis and its impact on communities
• The criminal justice system and racial disparities
• Homelessness and poverty in America
• The refugee crisis and global migration patterns
• LGBTQ+ rights and discrimination
• The rise of nationalism and its impact on global politics
• Gun control and mass shootings in America
• Environmental racism and its effects on marginalized communities
• The impact of globalization on developing countries
• Mental health stigma and access to treatment
• Cyberbullying and online harassment
• The #MeToo movement and sexual harassment in the workplace
• Access to healthcare and the rising cost of medical care
• The impact of technology on social relationships
• Food insecurity and hunger in America
• The effects of gentrification on low-income communities
• Disability rights and accessibility
• The criminalization of poverty and homelessness
• Human trafficking and modern-day slavery
• The impact of colonialism on indigenous communities
• The rise of authoritarianism and threats to democracy
• The education achievement gap and disparities in schools
• Mental health challenges facing college students
• The impact of social isolation on mental health
• The influence of religion on social norms and values
• The effects of gentrification on cultural identity
• The impact of social media on political discourse
• The role of activism in social change
• Access to clean water and sanitation in developing countries
• The impact of social media on body image and self-esteem
• The effects of income inequality on public health
• The criminalization of drug addiction and mental illness
• The impact of climate change on indigenous communities

These are just a few examples of social issues that you can explore in your essay. Remember to choose a topic that you are passionate about and that you feel strongly about. Researching and writing about social issues can be a powerful way to raise awareness and advocate for change in the world. Good luck with your essay!

Want to research companies faster?

Instantly access industry insights

Let PitchGrade do this for me

Leverage powerful AI research capabilities

We will create your text and designs for you. Sit back and relax while we do the work.

Explore More Content

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service

© 2024 Pitchgrade

• World Poverty as a Global Social Problem Words: 1204
• Benchmark as Social Problems Words: 555
• A Framework for Analyzing Social Problems Words: 1215
• Poverty and How This Problem Can Be Solved Words: 650
• Poverty: Causes and Solutions to Problem Words: 1677
• Poverty, Its Social Context, and Solutions Words: 826
• Wealth and Poverty Sources in America Words: 2266
• Social Policy and Welfare – Poverty and Deprivation Words: 1426
• Child Poverty Assessment in Canada Words: 2325
• Poverty and Social Causation Hypothesis Words: 866
• Substance Abuse: The Cause of Social Problems Words: 818
• The Problem of Poverty Among Children Words: 558

Poverty as a Social Problem

This free essay on poverty as a social problem looks at a grave problem that exists in America and in the world. It provides reasons why people are experiencing poverty as well as some solutions.

Introduction

Literature review, poverty as a social problem: reflection, solutions to poverty as a social problem, social problems: poverty essay conclusion.

Society often perceives poverty as an individualistic issue, believing it is a consequence of bad decisions. That is, people themselves are responsible for the level of income and financial stability of households. However, the subject is much more complex as poverty also results from inadequate structuring of the country’s economy, distribution of goods, and other sectors, making it a social problem. Failure to build a system that would help citizens become financially stable results in various issues associated with crime levels, education, health care, and others. The government is the one that should work to solve them.

There are numerous studies and publications researching the reasons behind poverty. E. Royce (2019) tries to explain in his book how the existing economic system in the United States prevents citizens from reaching an adequate level of income and financial support. The main idea is that the current structure of how goods are distributed across the population does not benefit a large portion of it. Few rich individuals grow wealthier yearly, while millions struggle to find a stable job with a minimum wage.

The inequality created by the government’s failure to build a fair economic system results in a range of social problems. The idea of a poverty line as a measure of well-being has not changed much since the 1960s despite the obvious changes in consumption patterns (Royce, 2019). It is calculated as the sum required for purchasing essential items for living, which does not include modern commodities such as computers, mobile phones, and others.

As a result, low-income people become socially isolated since they do not possess things essential for the modern lifestyle, like social networks. They may be excluded from a community for not corresponding with the public image of active individuals. These mechanisms, combined with the dominant idea of the necessity to achieve success, push poor people away from social life. This factor comes together with the inability to receive proper health care and education services.

The literature also contains studies on how poverty affects the behavior of individuals. For instance, children exposed to life in a low-income household are more likely to develop adverse reactions in the future due to strain resulting from the inability to receive wished items (McFarland, 2017). When placed in a densely populated neighborhood, they may later cause legal problems, creating delinquent areas.

It is easy to predict the social issues that poor people face daily. They cannot receive proper health care services as they are usually costly. Moreover, many commercial organizations offering low-paid jobs traditionally based on customer service may prevent employees from taking sick leaves. As a result, people suffer from various illnesses without attending a hospital, fearing to lose a work placement.

Another issue is the inability of poor people to send their children to high-performing schools, which are expensive as a rule. This factor causes youth to continue living with the same income level as their parents since the absence of quality education prevents them from receiving a decent job. Moreover, children who cannot acquire goods valued by their peers are likely to adopt criminal behavior to achieve success since community norms and morals do not help this purpose.

Summarizing all the above said, it becomes evident that changing the existing economic structure on the governmental level is the most appropriate solution to the issue of poverty. There should be a strategy covering all the aspects affected by this problem. The goal is to increase the level of financial support for disadvantaged groups and give more opportunities for people to grow their income.

Firstly, the social sector should be transformed to meet the needs of all citizens. The government should increase the financing of schools so that all children will have access to quality education. Also, various programs should engage youth in activities after classes. Another step is to make health care affordable for everyone, and there should be no pressure on workers when they decide to take sick leaves.

Secondly, the structure of budget spending should be redesigned. It is evident that social support programs require much financing from taxes. One of the possible strategies is to make the government spend less on other sectors. Also, solving the issue of delinquent behavior among youth by advancing social support may cut costs on police functioning as there will be a lower need for services such as patrolling.

Poverty is a structural problem resulting from a country’s inadequate economic system. It creates various social issues associated with poor health care services, low-quality education, criminal activity, and others. Poverty is a complex subject that cannot be resolved shortly. However, one of the possible strategies is to provide better financial and social support for the population, which will create more opportunities for people to increase their income level.

McFarland, M. (2017). Poverty and problem behaviors across the early life course: The role of sensitive period exposure. Population Research & Policy Review , 36 (5), 739-760.

Royce, E. (2019). Poverty and power: The problem of structural inequality (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2021, June 14). Poverty as a Social Problem. https://studycorgi.com/poverty-as-a-social-problem/

"Poverty as a Social Problem." StudyCorgi , 14 June 2021, studycorgi.com/poverty-as-a-social-problem/.

StudyCorgi . (2021) 'Poverty as a Social Problem'. 14 June.

1. StudyCorgi . "Poverty as a Social Problem." June 14, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/poverty-as-a-social-problem/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Poverty as a Social Problem." June 14, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/poverty-as-a-social-problem/.

StudyCorgi . 2021. "Poverty as a Social Problem." June 14, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/poverty-as-a-social-problem/.

This paper, “Poverty as a Social Problem”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: November 8, 2023 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Poverty in America

This essay will address the issue of poverty in America, discussing its various dimensions and causes. It will explore factors contributing to poverty, including economic inequality, lack of education, and systemic issues. The piece will examine the impact of poverty on different demographics and regions, and the measures being taken to alleviate it, such as government programs and community initiatives. At PapersOwl too, you can discover numerous free essay illustrations related to America.

How it works

Poverty has been a ongoing, social issue that throughout the years has changed its meaning. Poverty is defined lacking basic necessities such as water, food, shelter, wealth, etc… About fifty years ago, war was declared on poverty by President Johnson hoping that it would end, but fast forward today, it is one of the biggest social issues America is dealing with. We don’t really know why poverty is still occurring, because the reasons seem to always be changing. The reasons for it still occurring is modern times as of right now are social conflict theory, structural functionalism, and symbolic interaction.

One of the reasons that poverty seems to still continue is because of the social conflict approach that happens to be the structure for the belief that views society as a platform of injustice that generates change and conflict. Unlike structural functionalism which we will talk about in the next paragraph, the conflict theory withholds how social structure advocates how society is composed and conveyed, concentrating on how we and others are benefited and suffering from social patterns. “In the United States, inequalities have steadily increased the past 20 years”(Korgen). The conflict theory is used by sociologist by looking at the lasting dispute between improvement and deficiency of people, for instance the relation between the wealth and the underprivileged, the relations between races, and also the relation between genders.

The people that are on top try to defend, conserve and maintain their privileges, at the same time the people who are at a disadvantage in society assemble and acquire more for themselves and their families. Education is one of the many examples that displays inequality of schools and classrooms. Children that are born into an underprivileged house and not being a to receive a full education, as if being born into a wealthier household and having them funds to be able to afford higher eduction such as college, which in the long run will be able provide those children with higher paying careers or jobs in comparison to poor children who are not capable of supporting and providing a way to pay for college or the higher education. In results to not being able to afford college, these students are not able to attain a well paying job. Since these students are not able to attend high education and secure a high income job, these students end up mirroring the patterns of their parents.

The study of our society focusing on the inequality and conflict of racial groups. For example it is believed that the Caucasians have more social power over the nationalities of color. For instance, the powers are looked at to be more education, healthier life styles, and higher quality jobs. Gender conflicts as all the others it focuses on the inequality of women and men. Throughout the decades, men have always had the dominant positions in the work field which contributed to a better salary. To summarize the conflict theory symbols the hierarchical division of society as result of poverty considering the low opportunities from injustice and unfairness towards race, ethnics and gender.

Structural functionalism, what is it? Structional Functionalism is defined as the framework for building theory that sees societies as a complex system, whose parts work together to form a stable and solidarity society. Functionalist look at society as a system of interconnected parts that work together in harmony to maintain balance for the whole. According to Hebert Spencer that the human body which needs all its parts to work properly remembers a social functionalism which needs all parts of society to function. Social structure does not always end good, and have happy outcomes, which as an aftermath of dysfunction interfering with how a society is normal ran or functioning. Poverty is thought-out to be functional since several careers like doctors and attorneys call for more schooling and proficiency rather than jobs working in retail or restaurants which don’t require little to no education and skill. These high paying jobs have been narrowed down to those people that are eager to learn and spend time and money in school while having the mind set that all of their hard work will pay off due to the immense salary they will earn.

Lastly, poverty continues in todays society because a thing called symbolic interaction. Symbolic interaction explains social behavior in terms of how people as a society are interacting with one another. A symbolic interactionist believes a society is an outcome of everyday social interactions of individuals. In the world we live in, there are many symbols with connected meaning to everything interpreting our surroundings, assumptions about people and contracting an identity for ourselves. For instance, wealthy and poor people are portrayed in society completely differently. We as people look at a wealthier person and think of that person as hard-working and well educated, while underprivileged and poor people may be portrayed as inattentive and not well educated.

Finally, it may be concluded as property will always be social issue and looked at as lacking necessities like food, water, shelter. The United States is known to be one of the wealthiest countries in the world, however in “2017 they’re are 12.3% of America population still living in poverty, which works out to be 1 in 8 Americans.” (Pressman) Poverty today is not the same as it was 100’s of years ago, the definition is continuously changing and can be looked at in many different ways such as the conflict approaches, structural functionalism and finally symbolic interaction.  

Cite this page

Poverty in America. (2021, Apr 16). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/poverty-in-america/

"Poverty in America." PapersOwl.com , 16 Apr 2021, https://papersowl.com/examples/poverty-in-america/

PapersOwl.com. (2021). Poverty in America . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/poverty-in-america/ [Accessed: 9 Sep. 2024]

"Poverty in America." PapersOwl.com, Apr 16, 2021. Accessed September 9, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/poverty-in-america/

"Poverty in America," PapersOwl.com , 16-Apr-2021. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/poverty-in-america/. [Accessed: 9-Sep-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2021). Poverty in America . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/poverty-in-america/ [Accessed: 9-Sep-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Keep up to date with the Big Issue

The leading voice on life, politics, culture and social activism direct to your inbox.

The tinderbox of poverty continues to spark social unrest

The never-ending cycle of poverty means social unrest will never be far away. A radical solution is required

Abert Finney in Saturday Night and Sunday Morning. Image: Allstar Picture Library Ltd / Alamy

The riots a few weeks ago told a big story. That the state cannot acquiesce to disorder. That you will get sent down if you are caught. And it will put a deep hole in your life for a few years to come. Perhaps forever. I saw the rogues’ gallery of people sentenced and it showed a social uniformity of depressing scale. All without exception were not from the same social class as even that supposed working-class boy, Sir Keir Starmer .

They had the marks of labour but not of the Labour Party. Their gaunt pictures were frightening; they seemed like the lost generation of the inheritors of poverty. They had precious little skin in the game, if the game is the continuing motley of poverty here, prosperity there and never the means of crossing from one to the other. The game being that if you all buckle down and get on with it you’ll get your rewards. 

Get the latest news and insight into how the Big Issue magazine is made by signing up for the Inside Big Issue newsletter

There was a time when most of the men paraded before our eyes a few weeks back for public scrutiny would have worked in big state-sponsored businesses like the mines and shipbuilding. The vast car-building industry that even I worked in – me, the recipient of sheltered employment, as the car industry seldom made money.

Along with steel and heavy engineering they were heavily subsidised. But that was a lifetime ago, back when rather than have people on social security the state believed in creative accounting: they thought it was cheaper to keep the basic industries functioning, with state aid. For the alternative was social ruination in the festering pool of poverty support, rather than a reason to get up in the morning and get out to work. 

Time, a great killer if you’ve got lots of it spare, was then gifted to a whole generation – especially in the North , in the rough-hewn world of former industrial and mining towns. If you worked, it was not leading to prosperity but often away from it. And social security was willingly given as an alternative to skilling you up and away from need. 

The biggest lump of money ever spent by government in peacetime has been on trying to make the trauma of poverty marginally bearable. From Thatcher’s regime forward, we have seen a growing class of people who are bereft of that which will make them a well-behaved citizen, one of those who tend to live beyond the spoilage of modern life, a life that promotes nothing other than the misery of cheap jobs and broken social promises that are dressed up as barely liveable social security. 

It’s poverty. It’s need. It’s great holes in education. It’s wasting money to the tune of billions of pounds on simply warehousing people whose forefathers had some working purpose. 

I urge you to watch a great film called Saturday Night and Sunday Morning , starring the late and great Albert Finney. A working-class young man makes bike parts in Nottingham in a factory and is belligerent and likely to get drunk and into fights. Back in 1960 when it was made, even this truculent 20-year-old will settle down, because he’ll be in council housing that’s newly constructed and in semi-skilled, reasonably paid work in the years to come. But his son, or grandson, could be one of the troubled faces in the papers and on screens a few weeks back. 

Immigration has added to the pluses and minuses of this cocktail of a lost generation of men with no purpose. The poorest of areas have been magnets to the poorest coming in from the former empire. Poor with poor is not a recipe for social co-operation when serious investment in helping the old poor and the newly arriving poor to become communities, through the power of better education and better work, does not happen. There has been no investment in eradicating the poverty that breeds pernicious ignorance between people. 

To some the UK is seen as a social sponge that draws in the destitute from elsewhere, without addressing the problems that exist here. The cack-handed policy of sticking arrivers in hostels and hotels and not trying to use their skills to become wage earners is perverse. 

• Poverty prevention is our best hope. Here’s some tangible ways to keep people warm, dry and fed
• When it comes to poverty prevention it’s minds we must change – before anything else

Porous borders, without having a policy of addressing displacement as a new phenomenon, is hitting Europe. Prejudice is rising in all economies because this can be an economic, poverty-increasing issue. 

We never straightened out poverty after the creation of the Welfare State in 1948. We never addressed the impact of growing immigration, where the people arriving were simply added to the poor of the UK; the rewards of opportunity were never shared round. Poor people helped supply an increasing middle class with access to cheap food and transport, and underpaid NHS staff. Social peace was kept not by addressing the social and class discrepancies but by relying on the exhaustion of just being poor and hardly able to make ends meet. 

Now refugees who seek refuge in the UK, who many welcome, have to fit into this social jigsaw of deprivation, lack of opportunity and poor social conditions. For too long the exporter of people to foreign parts, the tide is turned and Europe becomes an escape route for people seeking prosperity and safety. 

How we get the message out to the people on the front line of the new arrivals is a challenge to us all. How do we explain an ever-changing world to all people who are affected by it? It took the tragic killing of three children to bring this all to a boiling point. Understanding how this groundswell of hatred came about is for us all to understand. 

We are in a poor place because we wasted money and time on trying to eradicate poverty so inefficiently; preferring to hand out relief rather than a hand up. The tinderbox of poverty has to be addressed and that will take more than “more of the same”. A call for the creation of a Ministry of Poverty Prevention is my own contribution to this ongoing need.

John Bird is the founder and editor-in-chief of The Big Issue. Read more of his words  here .

Do you have a story to tell or opinions to share about this? We want to hear from you.  Get in touch and tell us more

• From the magazine
• learning and employment
• Poverty Prevention

Subscribe to your local Big Issue vendor

Recommended for you

Why the natural human failure of imagination stops us from relieving children's suffering

Libraries are a boundless resource. we mustn't let their lights go out.

For many homeless people their relationship with their dog is lifesaving. Here's why

Four things Labour's new taskforce must do immediately to end homelessness

Most popular.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know

A Model for Rational Generosity of the Rich: Status Concern and Poverty Blaming When Social Classes are Partially Segregated

27 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2024

Bianca Sanesi

IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca

Ennio Bilancini

Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE) - Dipartimento di Economia Marco Biagi di Modena

Leonardo Boncinelli

University of Florence - Department of Economics and Management

We study a three-type, two-market signaling model of social status.  When status competition happens in segregated markets and only between contiguous types (poor and middle in the low market; middle and rich in the high market), the highest type (the rich) has novel and non-trivial incentives: (i) endowing the lowest type (the poor) with more income may or may not be beneficial, at the expense of the type that competes with both (the middle), and (ii) blaming poverty is always beneficial at the expenses of the others.Theoretical predictions help explain real-world observations like the tendency of rich people to set themselves apart from the rest of society, their propensity to donate money to the extremely poor, and the existence of poverty blaming.We provide indications of what conditions may be more conducive of support to particular forms of redistribution.

Keywords: Social status, Segregation, Income distribution, Signaling, Conspicuous consumption, Poverty blaming

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Bianca Sanesi (Contact Author)

Imt school for advanced studies lucca ( email ).

Lucca Italy

Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE) - Dipartimento di Economia Marco Biagi di Modena ( email )

Via Università 4 Modena, Modena 41121 Italy

University of Florence - Department of Economics and Management ( email )

Via delle Pandette, 9 Firenze, Florence 50127 Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, microeconomics: welfare economics & collective decision-making ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal

Comparative political economy: social welfare policy ejournal, social stratification, social mobility & inequality ejournal, political economy - development: underdevelopment & poverty ejournal.

• Open access
• Published: 09 September 2024

Exploring the impact of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children and young people in the United Kingdom: a qualitative systematic review

• Emma S. Hock 1 ,
• Lindsay Blank 1 ,
• Hannah Fairbrother 1 ,
• Mark Clowes 1 ,
• Diana Castelblanco Cuevas 1 ,
• Andrew Booth 1 ,
• Amy Clair 2 &
• Elizabeth Goyder 1  

BMC Public Health volume  24 , Article number:  2453 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Housing insecurity can be understood as experiencing or being at risk of multiple house moves that are not through choice and related to poverty. Many aspects of housing have all been shown to impact children/young people’s health and wellbeing. However, the pathways linking housing and childhood health and wellbeing are complex and poorly understood.

We undertook a systematic review synthesising qualitative data on the perspectives of children/young people and those close to them, from the United Kingdom (UK). We searched databases, reference lists, and UK grey literature. We extracted and tabulated key data from the included papers, and appraised study quality. We used best fit framework synthesis combined with thematic synthesis, and generated diagrams to illustrate hypothesised causal pathways.

We included 59 studies and identified four populations: those experiencing housing insecurity in general (40 papers); associated with domestic violence (nine papers); associated with migration status (13 papers); and due to demolition-related forced relocation (two papers). Housing insecurity took many forms and resulted from several interrelated situations, including eviction or a forced move, temporary accommodation, exposure to problematic behaviour, overcrowded/poor-condition/unsuitable property, and making multiple moves. Impacts included school-related, psychological, financial and family wellbeing impacts, daily long-distance travel, and poor living conditions, all of which could further exacerbate housing insecurity. People perceived that these experiences led to mental and physical health problems, tiredness and delayed development. The impact of housing insecurity was lessened by friendship and support, staying at the same school, having hope for the future, and parenting practices. The negative impacts of housing insecurity on child/adolescent health and wellbeing may be compounded by specific life circumstances, such as escaping domestic violence, migration status, or demolition-related relocation.

Housing insecurity has a profound impact on children and young people. Policies should focus on reducing housing insecurity among families, particularly in relation to reducing eviction; improving, and reducing the need for, temporary accommodation; minimum requirements for property condition; and support to reduce multiple and long-distance moves. Those working with children/young people and families experiencing housing insecurity should prioritise giving them optimal choice and control over situations that affect them.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The impacts of socioeconomic position in childhood on adult health outcomes and mortality are well documented in quantitative analyses (e.g., [ 1 ]). Housing is a key mechanism through which social and structural inequalities can impact health [ 2 ]. The impact of housing conditions on child health are well established [ 3 ]. Examining the wellbeing of children and young people within public health overall is of utmost importance [ 4 ]. Children and young people (and their families) who are homeless are a vulnerable group with particular difficulty in accessing health care and other services, and as such, meeting their needs should be a priority [ 5 ].

An extensive and diverse evidence base captures relationships between housing and health, including both physical and mental health outcomes. Much of the evidence relates to the quality of housing and specific aspects of poor housing including cold and damp homes, poorly maintained housing stock or inadequate housing leading to overcrowded accommodation [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The health impacts of housing insecurity, together with the particular vulnerability of children and young people to the effects of not having a secure and stable home environment, continue to present a cause for increased concern [ 7 , 8 , 11 , 14 ]. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Reviews (PHR) Programme commissioned the current review in response to concerns about rising levels of housing insecurity and the impact of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children and young people in the United Kingdom (UK).

Terminology and definitions related to housing insecurity

Numerous diverse terms are available to define housing insecurity, with no standard definition or validated instrument. For the purpose of our review, we use the terminology and definitions used by the Children’s Society, which are comprehensive and based directly on research with children that explores the relationship between housing and wellbeing [ 15 ]. They use the term “housing insecurity” for those experiencing and at risk of multiple moves that are (i) not through choice and (ii) related to poverty [ 15 ]. This reflects their observation that multiple moves may be a positive experience if they are by choice and for positive reasons (e.g., employment opportunities; moves to better housing or areas with better amenities). This definition also acknowledges that the wider health and wellbeing impacts of housing insecurity may be experienced by families that may not have experienced frequent moves but for whom a forced move is a very real possibility. The Children’s Society definition of housing insecurity encompasses various elements (see Table  1 ).

Housing insecurity in the UK today – the extent of the problem

Recent policy and research reports from multiple organisations in the UK highlight a rise in housing insecurity among families with children [ 19 , 22 , 23 ]. Housing insecurity has grown following current trends in the cost and availability of housing, reflecting in particular the rapid increase in the number of low-income families with children in the private rental sector [ 19 , 22 , 24 ], where housing tenures are typically less secure. The ending of a tenancy in the private rental sector was the main cause of homelessness given in 15,500 (27% of claims) of applications for homelessness assistance in 2017/18, up from 6,630 (15% of claims) in 2010/11 for example [ 25 ]. The increased reliance on the private rented sector for housing is partly due to a lack of social housing and unaffordability of home ownership [ 23 ]. The nature of tenure in the private rental sector and gap between available benefits and housing costs means even low-income families that have not experienced frequent moves may experience the negative impacts of being at persistent risk of having to move [ 26 ]. Beyond housing benefit changes, other changes to the social security system have been linked with increased housing insecurity. The roll-out of Universal Credit Footnote 1 , with its built-in waits for payments, has been linked with increased rent arrears [ 27 , 28 ]. The introduction of the benefit cap, which limits the amount of social security payments a household can receive, disproportionately affects housing support and particularly affecting lone parents [ 29 , 30 , 31 ].

The increase in families experiencing housing insecurity, including those living with relatives or friends (the ‘hidden homeless’) and those in temporary accommodation provided by local authorities, are a related consequence of the lack of suitable or affordable rental properties, which is particularly acute for lone parents and larger families. The numbers of children and young people entering the social care system or being referred to social services because of family housing insecurity contributes further evidence on the scale and severity of the problem [ 32 ].

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated housing insecurity in the UK [ 24 ], with the impacts continuing to be felt. In particular, the pandemic increased financial pressures on families (due to loss of income and increased costs for families with children/young people at home). These financial pressures were compounded by a reduction in informal temporary accommodation being offered by friends and family due to social isolation precautions [ 24 ]. Further, the COVID-19 pandemic underscored the risks to health posed by poor housing quality (including overcrowding) and housing insecurity [ 24 , 33 ]. Recent research with young people in underserved communities across the country also highlighted their experience of the uneven impact of COVID-19 for people in contrasting housing situations [ 34 ].

While the temporary ban on bailiff-enforced evictions, initiated due to the pandemic, went some way towards acknowledging the pandemic’s impact on housing insecurity, housing organisations are lobbying for more long-term strategies to support people with pandemic-induced debt and rent-arrears [ 33 ]. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has warned of the very real risk of a ‘two-tier recovery’ from the pandemic, highlighting the ‘disproportionate risks facing people who rent their homes’ ([ 35 ], para. 1). Their recent large-scale survey found that one million renting households worry about being evicted in the next three months, and half of these were families with children [ 35 ]. The survey also found that households with children, renters from ethnic minority backgrounds and households on low incomes are disproportionately affected by pandemic-induced debt and rent arrears [ 35 ].

The cost-of-living crisis is exacerbating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, with many households experiencing or set to experience housing insecurity due to relative reductions in income accompanying increases in rent and mortgage repayments [ 36 ]. People experiencing or at risk of housing insecurity are disproportionately affected, due to higher food and utility costs [ 37 ].

Research evidence on relationships between housing in childhood and health

Housing is a key social determinant of health, and a substantive evidence base of longitudinal cohort studies and intervention studies supports a causal relationship between the quality, affordability and stability of housing and child health [ 38 ]. Evidence includes immediate impacts on mental and physical health outcomes and longer-term life course effects on wider determinants of health including education, employment and income as well as health outcomes [ 39 ].

The negative health impact of poor physical housing conditions has been well documented [ 40 , 41 ]. Housing instability and low housing quality are associated with worse psychological health among young people and parents [ 42 , 43 ]. The UK National Children’s Bureau [ 22 ] draws attention to US-based research showing that policies that reduced housing insecurity for young children can help to improve their emotional health [ 44 ], and that successful strategies for reducing housing insecurity have the potential to reduce negative outcomes for children with lived experience of housing insecurity, including emotional and behavioural problems, lower academic attainment and poor adult health and wellbeing [ 45 ]. A variety of pathways have been implicated in the relationship between housing insecurity and child health and wellbeing, including depression and psychological distress in parents, material hardships and difficulties in maintaining a good bedtime routine [ 38 ]. Frequent moves are also associated with poorer access to preventive health services, reflected, for example, in lower vaccination rates [ 46 , 47 ].

Housing tenure, unstable housing situations and the quality or suitability of homes are inter-related [ 48 ]. For example, if families are concerned that if they lost their home they would not be able to afford alternative accommodation, they may be more likely to stay in smaller or poor-quality accommodation or in a neighbourhood where they are further from work, school or family support. In this way, housing insecurity can lead to diverse negative health and wellbeing impacts relating to housing and the neighbourhoods, even if in the family does not experience frequent moves or homelessness [ 49 ]. Thus, the relationship between housing insecurity and child health is likely to be complicated by the frequent coexistence of poor housing conditions or unsuitable housing with housing insecurity. The relationship between unstable housing situations and health outcomes is further confounded by other major stressors, such as poverty and changes in employment and family structure, which may lead to frequent moves.

The evidence from cohort studies that show a relationship between housing insecurity, homelessness or frequent moves in childhood and health related outcomes can usefully quantify the proportion of children/young people and families at risk of poorer health associated with housing instability. It can, however, only suggest plausible causal associations. Further, the ‘less tangible aspects of housing’ such as instability are poorly understood [ 40 ]. Additional (and arguably stronger) evidence documenting the relationship between housing insecurity and health/wellbeing comes from the case studies and qualitative interviews with children and young people and families that explore the direct and indirect impacts of housing insecurity on their everyday lives and wellbeing. Thus, the current review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise research evidence that explores the relationship between housing insecurity and the health and wellbeing among children and young people. We aimed to highlight the relevant factors and causal mechanisms to make evidence-based recommendations for policy, practice and future research priorities.

We undertook a systematic review synthesising qualitative data, employing elements of rapid review methodology in recognition that the review was time-constrained. This involved two steps: (1) a single screening by one reviewer of titles and abstracts, with a sample checked by another reviewer; and (2) a single data extraction and quality assessment, with a sample checked by another reviewer) [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. The protocol is registered on the PROSPERO registry, registration number CRD42022327506.

Search strategy

Searches of the following databases were conducted on 8th April 2022 (from 2000 to April 2022): MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO (via Ovid); ASSIA and IBSS (via ProQuest) and Social Sciences Citation Index (via Web of Science). Due to the short timescales for this project, searches aimed to balance sensitivity with specificity, and were conceptualised around the following concepts: (housing insecurity) and (children or families) and (experiences); including synonyms, and with the addition of a filter to limit results to the UK where available [ 53 ]. To expedite translation of search strings across different databases, searches prioritised free text search strings (including proximity operators), in order to retrieve relevant terms where they occurred in titles, abstracts or any other indexing field (including subject headings). The searches of ASSIA and IBSS (via ProQuest) and Social Sciences Citation Index (via Web of Science) used a simplified strategy adapted from those reproduced in Additional File 1. Database searching was accompanied by scrutiny of reference lists of included papers and relevant systematic reviews (within search dates), and grey literature searching (see Supplementary Table 1, Additional File 2), which was conducted and documented using processes outlined by Stansfield et al . [ 54 ].

Inclusion criteria

We included qualitative studies, including qualitative elements of mixed methods studies from published and grey literature (excluding dissertations and non-searchable books), that explored the impact of housing insecurity, defined according to the Children’s Society [ 15 ] definition (which includes actual or perceived insecurity related to housing situations), on immediate and short-term outcomes related to childhood mental and physical health and wellbeing (up to the age of 16), among families experiencing / at risk of housing insecurity in the UK (including low-income families, lone-parent families, and ethnic minority group families including migrants, refugees and asylum seekers). Informants could include children and young people themselves, parents / close family members, or other informants with insight into the children and young people’s experiences. Children and young people outside a family unit (i.e., who had left home or were being looked after by the local authority) and families from Roma and Irish Traveller communities were excluded, as their circumstances are likely to differ substantially from the target population.

Study selection

Search results from electronic databases were downloaded to a reference management application (EndNote). The titles and abstracts of all records were screened against the inclusion criteria by one of three reviewers and checked for agreement by a further reviewer. Full texts of articles identified at abstract screening were screened against the inclusion criteria by one reviewer. A proportion (10%) of papers excluded at the full paper screening stage were checked by a second reviewer. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion.

Grey literature searches and screening were documented in a series of tables [ 54 ]. One reviewer (of two) screened titles of relevant web pages and reports against the inclusion criteria for each web platform searched, and downloaded and screened the full texts of potentially eligible titles. Queries relating to selection were checked by another reviewer, with decisions discussed among the review team until a consensus was reached.

One reviewer (of two) screened reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews for potentially relevant papers. One reviewer downloaded the abstracts and full texts of relevant references and assessed them for relevance.

Data extraction

We devised a data extraction form based on forms that the team has previously tested for similar reviews of public health topics. Three reviewers piloted the extraction form and suggested revisions were agreed before commencing further extraction. Three reviewers extracted and tabulated key data from the included papers and grey literature sources, with one reviewer completing data extraction of each study and a second reviewer formally checking a 10% sample for accuracy and consistency. The following data items were extracted: author and year, location, aims, whether housing insecurity was an aim, study design, analysis, who the informants were, the housing situation of the family, reasons for homelessness or housing insecurity, conclusion, relevant policy/practice implications and limitations. Any qualitative data relating to housing insecurity together with some aspect of health or wellbeing in children and young people aged 0–16 years were extracted, including authors’ themes (to provide context), authors’ interpretations, and verbatim quotations from participants. We sought to maintain fidelity to author and participant terminologies and phrasing throughout.

Quality appraisal

Peer-reviewed academic literature was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative studies [ 55 ] and the quality of grey literature sources (webpages and reports) was appraised using the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance (AACODS) checklist [ 56 ]. Because of concerns about the lack of peer review and/or the absence of a stated methodology, it was decided to use the AACODS tool that extends beyond simple assessment of study design. A formal quality assessment checklist was preferred for journal articles that passed these two entry criteria. One reviewer performed quality assessment, with a second reviewer formally checking a 10% sample for accuracy and consistency.

Development of the conceptual framework

Prior to undertaking the current review, we undertook preliminary literature searches to identify an appropriate conceptual framework or logic model to guide the review and data synthesis process. However, we were unable to identify a framework that specifically focused on housing insecurity among children and young people and that was sufficiently broad to capture relevant contexts, exposures and impacts. We therefore developed an a priori conceptual framework based on consultation with key policy and practice stakeholders and topic experts and examination of key policy documents (see Fig.  1 ).

A priori conceptual framework for the relationship between housing insecurity and the health and wellbeing of children and young people

We initially consulted policy experts who identified relevant organisations including research centres, charities and other third sector organisations. We obtained relevant policy reports from organisational contacts and websites, including Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG), Crisis, Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) and HACT (Housing Association Charitable Trust), NatCen (People Living in Bad Housing, 2013), the UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence (CaCHE), and the Centre on Household Assets and Savings Management (CHASM) (Homes and Wellbeing, 2018). We also identified a key report on family homelessness from the Children’s Commissioner (Bleak Houses. 2019) and a joint report from 11 charities and advocacy organisations published by Shelter (Post-Covid Policy: Child Poverty, Social Security and Housing, 2022). We also consulted local authority officers with responsibility for housing and their teams in two local councils and third sector providers of housing-related support to young people and families (Centrepoint). Stakeholders and topic experts were invited to comment on the potential focus of the review and the appropriate definitions and scope for the ‘exposure’ (unstable housing), the population (children and young people) and outcomes (health and wellbeing). Exposures relate to how children and families experience housing insecurity, impacts are intermediate outcomes that may mediate the effects of housing insecurity on health and wellbeing (e.g., the psychological, social, and environmental consequences of experiencing housing insecurity), and outcomes are childhood health and wellbeing effects of housing insecurity (including the effects of the impacts/intermediate outcomes).

The contextual factors and main pathways between housing-related factors and the health and wellbeing of children and young people identified were incorporated into the initial conceptual framework. We then used this conceptual framework to guide data synthesis.

Data synthesis

We adopted a dual approach whereby we synthesised data according to the a priori conceptual framework and sought additional themes, categories and nuance inductively from the data, in an approach consistent with the second stage of ‘best fit framework synthesis’ [ 57 , 58 ]. We analysed inductive themes using the Thomas and Harden [ 59 ] approach to thematic synthesis, but coded text extracts (complete sentences or clauses) instead of coding line by line [ 60 , 61 ].

First, one reviewer (of two) coded text extracts inductively and within the conceptual framework, simultaneously, linking each relevant text extract to both an inductive code based on the content of the text extract, and to an element of the conceptual framework. We assigned multiple codes to some extracts, and the codes could be linked to any single element or to multiple elements of the conceptual framework. During the process of data extraction, we identified four distinct populations, and coded (and synthesised) data discretely for each population. We initially coded data against the ‘exposure’, ‘impacts’ and ‘outcomes’ elements of the conceptual framework, however we subsequently added a further element within the data; ‘protective factors’. One reviewer then examined the codes relating to each element of the conceptual framework and grouped the codes according to conceptual similarity and broader meaning, reporting the thematic structure and relationships between concepts apparent from the text extracts both narratively and within a diagram to illustrate hypothesised causal pathways within the original conceptual framework, to highlight links between specific exposures, impacts and outcomes for each population. While we synthesised the findings by population initially, and present separate diagrams for each population, we present overall findings in this manuscript due to several similarities and then highlight any important differences for the domestic violence, migrant/refugee/asylum seeker, and relocation populations.

Study selection and included studies

Here we report the results of our three separate searchers. First, the database searches generated 3261 records after the removal of duplicates. We excluded 3025 records after title and abstract screening, examined 236 full texts, and included 16 peer-reviewed papers (reporting on 16 studies). The reasons for exclusion of each paper are provided in the Supplementary Table 2, Additional File 3. Second, we examined 726 grey literature sources (after an initial title screen) and included 37 papers. Third, we examined 85 papers that we identified as potentially relevant from the references lists of included papers and relevant reviews, and included six (two of which were peer-reviewed publications). Figure  2 summarises the process of study selection and Table 2  presents a summary of study characteristics. Of the included studies, 16 took place across the UK as a whole, one was conducted in England and Scotland, one in England and Wales and 17 in England. In terms of specific locations, where these were reported, 13 were reported to have been conducted in London (including specific boroughs or Greater London), two in Birmingham, one in Fife, two in Glasgow, one in Leicester, one in Rotherham and Doncaster, and one in Sheffield. The location of one study was not reported (Table 2 ).

Flow diagram of study selection

We identified four distinct populations for which research evidence was available during the process of study selection and data extraction:

General population (evidence relating to housing insecurity in general) (reported in 40 papers);

Domestic violence population (children and young people experiencing housing insecurity associated with domestic violence) (reported in nine papers);

Migrant, refugee and asylum seeker population (children and young people experiencing housing insecurity associated with migration status) (reported in 13 papers);

Relocation population (evidence relating to families forced to relocate due to planned demolition) (reported in two papers).

Evidence relating to each of these populations was synthesised separately as the specific housing circumstances may impact health and wellbeing differently and we anticipated that specific considerations would relate to each population. Some studies reported evidence for more than one population.

Quality of evidence

The quality of evidence varied across the studies, with published literature generally being of higher quality than grey literature and containing more transparent reporting of methods, although reporting of methods of data collection and analysis varied considerably within the grey literature. All 18 peer-reviewed studies reported an appropriate methodology, addressing the aim of the study with an adequate design. Eleven of the 18 peer-reviewed studies reported ethical considerations, and only two reported reflexivity. Most studies had an overall assessment of moderate-high quality (based on the endorsement of most checklist items) and no studies were excluded based on quality. Most of the grey literature originated from known and valued sources (e.g., high-profile charities specialising in poverty and housing, with the research conducted by university-based research teams). Although methodologies and methods were often poorly described (or not at all), primary data in the form of quotations was usually available and suitable to contribute to the development of themes within the evidence base as a whole. Quality appraisals of included studies are presented in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4, Additional File 4.

Housing insecurity and the health and wellbeing of children and young people

The updated conceptual framework for the impact of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children aged 0–16 years in family units is presented in Fig.  3 for the general population, Fig.  4 for the domestic violence population, Fig.  5 for the refugee/migrant/asylum seeker population, and Fig.  6 for the relocation population (arrows represent links identified in the evidence and coloured arrows are used to distinguish links relating to each element of the model). Table 3 outlines the themes, framework components and studies reporting data for each theme.

Conceptual framework for the relationship between housing insecurity and health and wellbeing in the general population

Conceptual framework for the relationship between housing insecurity and health and wellbeing in the domestic violence population

Conceptual framework for the relationship between housing insecurity and health and wellbeing in the migrant, refugee and asylum seeker population

Conceptual framework for the relationship between housing insecurity and health and wellbeing in the relocation population

Exposures are conceptualised as the manifestations of housing insecurity – that is, how the children and young people experience it – and housing insecurity was experienced in multiple and various ways. These included trouble paying for housing, eviction or the prospect of eviction, making multiple moves, living in temporary accommodation, and the inaccessibility of suitable accommodation.

Fundamentally, a key driver of housing insecurity is poverty. Parents and, in some cases, young people cited the high cost of housing, in particular housing benefit not fully covering the rent amount [ 116 ], trouble making housing payments and falling into arrears [ 15 , 92 , 97 ]. Sometimes, families were evicted for non-payment [ 15 , 102 ], often linked to the rising cost of housing [ 109 ] or loss of income [ 102 ]. Some children and young people were not aware of reasons for eviction [ 90 ], and the prospect of facing eviction was also a source of housing insecurity [ 116 ].

The cost of housing could lead to families having to move multiple times [ 116 ], with lack of affordability and the use of short-term tenancies requiring multiple moves [ 109 , 116 ]. Children and young people were not always aware of the reasons for multiple moves [ 15 ]. Multiple moves could impact upon education and friendships [ 77 , 82 ].

Living in temporary housing was a common experience of housing insecurity [ 15 , 71 , 87 , 90 , 94 , 98 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 ]. Temporary housing caused worry at the thought of having to move away from school and friends [ 91 ] and acute distress, which manifested as bedwetting, night waking and emotional and behavioural issues at school [ 66 ]. Living in a hostel for a period of time could lead to friendship issues due to not being able to engage in sleepovers with friends [ 102 ].

The inaccessibility of suitable accommodation also contributed to insecurity. Sometimes, when a family needed to move, they had to fulfil certain requirements, for instance, to decorate their overcrowded 3-bedroom accommodation to be eligible for a more suitable property [ 15 ]. Further, some families encountered the barrier of landlords who would not accept people on benefits [ 15 , 85 , 117 ]. Waiting lists for social housing could be prohibitively long [ 97 , 98 , 116 ].

Dual exposures and impacts

Some phenomena were found to be both exposures and impacts of housing insecurity, in that some issues and experiences that were impacts of housing insecurity further exacerbated the living situation, causing further insecurity. These included not feeling safe, exposure to problematic behaviour, living far away from daily activities, overcrowding, and poor or unsuitable condition properties.

Not feeling safe was frequently reported by children and young people, and by parents in relation to the safety of children and young people. Parents and children and young people described being moved to neighbourhoods or localities [ 15 , 69 , 87 , 90 , 103 ] and accommodation [ 87 , 97 , 109 , 112 , 113 , 114 ] that did not feel safe. For one family, this was due to racial abuse experienced by a parent while walking to school [ 69 ]. In one case, a young person’s perception of safety improved over time, and they grew to like the neighbours and area [ 15 ], although this was a rare occurrence.

Often, this experience of being unsafe was due to exposure to problematic behaviour in or around their accommodation, including hearing other children being treated badly [ 112 ], being exposed to violence (including against their parents) [ 111 , 112 , 114 ], witnessing people drinking and taking drugs [ 69 , 83 , 90 , 111 , 112 , 114 ], finding drug paraphernalia in communal areas [ 112 , 114 ] or outside spaces [ 69 ], hearing threats of violence [ 111 ], hearing shouting and screaming in other rooms [ 114 ], witnessing people breaking into their room [ 83 ], and witnessing their parent/s receiving racist abuse and being sworn at [ 83 ].

‘There’s a lot [of] drugs and I don’t want my kids seeing that… One time he said ‘mummy I heard a woman on the phone saying ‘I’m going to set fire to your face’’ She was saying these things and my son was hearing it.’ ( [ 111 ] , p.15)

Another impact related to the family and children and young people being isolated and far away from family, friends, other support networks, work, shops, school and leisure pursuits due to the location of the new or temporary housing [ 15 , 83 , 87 , 97 , 104 , 109 ]. This affected education, friendships, finances and access to services (see ‘ Impacts ’).

Overcrowding was another issue that was both a source or feature of housing insecurity, as this created a need to move, as well as being an impact, in that families moved to unsuitable properties because they had little alternative. Overcrowding was largely a feature of temporary accommodation that was too small for the family [ 67 , 91 ], including hostels/shared houses where whole families inhabited one room and washing facilities were shared [ 100 , 102 ]. In turn, overcrowding could mean siblings sharing a room and/or bed [ 15 , 41 , 64 , 71 , 78 , 109 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 116 ] (which could lead to disturbed sleep [ 15 ]), children/young people or family members sleeping on the floor or sofa [ 15 , 71 , 102 , 110 ] (which caused aches and pains in children/young people; [ 100 ]), children/young people sharing a room with parents [ 64 , 71 , 94 , 109 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 ], a room being too small to carry out day to day tasks [ 112 , 113 , 114 ], a lack of privacy in general (e.g., having to change clothes in front of each other) [ 70 , 111 , 112 , 114 ], living in close proximity to other families [ 114 ], and cramped conditions with little room to move when too many people and possessions had to share a small space [ 15 , 64 , 90 , 97 , 103 , 109 , 114 ].

It’s all of us in one room, you can imagine the tension…. everyone’s snapping because they don’t have their own personal space …it’s just a room with two beds. My little brother has to do his homework on the floor.’ ( [ 97 ] , p..43)

It was thus difficult for children and young people to have their own space, even for a short time [ 98 ], including space to do schoolwork [ 102 , 103 ], play [ 91 ] or invite friends over [ 103 ]. Families sometimes ended up overcrowded due to cohabiting with extended family [ 110 ] or friends [ 91 , 102 ] (‘hidden homelessness’). Other families outgrew their property, or anticipated they would in future, when children grew older [ 70 , 116 ]. Overcrowding sometimes meant multiple families inhabiting a single building (e.g., a hostel or shelter), where single parents had difficulties using shared facilities, due to not wanting to leave young children alone [ 100 ]. Overcrowding could also lead to children feeling unsafe, including being scared of other people in shared accommodation [ 102 ], experiencing noise [ 102 ], and feeling different from peers (due to not having their own room or even bed) [ 102 ]. Living in overcrowded conditions could lead to, or exacerbate, boredom, aggressive behaviour, and mental health problems among children and young people (see ‘ Outcomes ’) [ 72 , 79 , 91 ]. Overcrowded conditions caused a ‘relentless daily struggle’ for families ([ 83 ], p.48).

Similarly, the need to take whatever property was on offer led to families living in properties in poor condition, which in turn could exacerbate housing insecurity, both because families needed to escape the poor condition housing and because they were reluctant to complain and ask for repairs on their current property in case the landlord increased the rent or evicted them [ 86 , 96 ]. Eviction was perceived as a real threat and families described being evicted after requesting environmental health issues [ 74 ] and health and safety issues [ 116 ] be addressed. Families experienced issues relating to poor condition properties, including accommodation being in a poor state of decoration [ 98 ], broken or barely useable fixtures and fittings [ 86 , 90 , 96 ], no laundry or cooking facilities [ 102 ], no electricity [ 67 ], no or little furniture [ 67 , 102 ], broken appliances [ 71 , 96 , 97 ], structural failings [ 97 ], unsafe gardens [ 90 ], mould [ 71 , 90 , 96 , 97 , 104 , 109 ], and bedbugs and/or vermin [ 67 , 76 , 77 ]. Even where the property condition was acceptable, accommodation could be unsuitable in other ways. Many families with young children found themselves living in upper floor flats, having to navigate stairs with pushchairs and small children [ 71 , 74 , 78 , 83 , 87 , 92 , 109 ]. One study reported how a family with a child who had cerebral palsy and asthma were refused essential central heating and so had to request a property transfer [ 75 ]. Lack of space to play was a particular issue in relation to temporary accommodation, often due to overly small accommodation or a vermin infestation [ 80 , 87 , 91 ]. In small children, the effects included health and safety risks [ 87 , 112 ] and challenges keeping them occupied [ 112 ]. In older children and young people, a lack of space meant a lack of privacy [ 63 , 112 ]. School holidays could be particularly challenging, particularly when outside play spaces were unsuitable due to safety concerns (e.g., people selling drugs, broken glass) [ 87 , 106 ], and some temporary accommodation restricted access during the daytime [ 112 ]. With shared temporary accommodation, such as a refuge or hostel, came the threat of possessions being removed by others [ 80 ].

Impacts are defined here as intermediate outcomes that may mediate the effects of housing insecurity on health and wellbeing, for instance, the psychological, social, and environmental consequences of experiencing housing insecurity. According to the evidence reviewed, these were overwhelmingly negative, with only a very small number of positive impacts, and, in many cases, these were offset by other negative impacts. Impacts on friendships, education, family relationships, diet, hygiene, access to services, feelings of being different, feelings of insecurity, parental wellbeing, the financial situation of the family, experiences of noise, leaving negative situations behind, and other impacts, such as leaving pets behind and time costs, were noted. Overlaying all of the above was a lack of choice and control experienced by the children/young people and their families.

A particularly large and disruptive impact of housing insecurity was the effect on friendships and social networks. Over multiple moves, children and young people faced the challenge of building new social networks and reputations each time [ 15 , 90 , 106 ], and worried about maintaining existing friendships [ 90 ]. The beneficial side to this was the potential to have friends all over town, although this was offset by difficulty in forming close friendships due to frequent moves [ 15 ]. Children and young people in temporary, overcrowded or poor condition accommodation often felt ashamed of their housing and concealed it from their friends [ 15 , 73 , 78 , 111 , 112 , 114 , 115 ], and in one case missing out on sleepovers with friends [ 102 ]. Moving far from friends presented difficulties in maintaining friendships and a social life, leading to boredom and isolation [ 102 , 114 ]. The threat of an impending long-distance move could cause sadness and worry [ 114 ] and young people missed the friends they had left behind [ 15 , 90 ]. Other associated social impacts of housing insecurity exacerbated by the wider experience of poverty included turning turn down invitations to go out with friends for financial reasons [ 115 ] or to avoid leaving a parent alone with younger sibling/s [ 114 ], and feeling different from peers, either because of looking unkempt or lacking in confidence [ 115 ].

Another key impact of housing insecurity was the effect on education, and this was closely intertwined with friendship impacts. Faced with moving, often multiple times, sometimes to uncertain locations, families were faced with the decision to keep the same school or to change schools. Multiple moves and/or an unfeasibly long journey to school, led to either a decision to, or anticipating the prospect of having to, change schools [ 15 , 66 , 90 , 91 , 102 , 106 , 108 , 111 , 116 ]. This could in turn impact on the child’s sense of stability, academic performance and friendships [ 90 , 105 , 106 , 111 , 115 , 116 ] and make them feel sad [ 102 ]. In the case of one family, staying at the same school during a move resulted in decreased educational attainment [ 69 ].

Staying at the same school created some stability and allowed for friendships and connections with teachers and the school to be maintained [ 15 , 102 ]. This was, however, quite often the only option, due to the family not knowing their next location, and thus which school they would be near [ 15 , 102 , 113 ], and was not without issues. Those who were unhappy with school were thus effectively prevented from changing schools due to housing insecurity [ 15 , 90 ]. Families were often re-housed at a considerable distance from the school [ 15 , 70 , 93 , 94 , 113 ]. This meant having to get up very early for a long journey by public transport [ 15 , 66 , 70 , 77 , 88 , 90 , 94 , 102 , 105 , 106 , 111 , 113 ], which also caused problems maintaining friendships [ 115 ], increased tiredness and stress [ 15 , 66 , 77 , 102 , 111 , 113 , 114 , 115 ] and left little time for homework and extra-curricular activities [ 113 , 114 , 115 ]. Some children and young people stayed with friends or relatives closer to school on school nights, although these arrangements were not sustainable longer-term [ 15 , 90 ].

Living in temporary housing was associated with practical challenges in relation to schooling, for instance, keeping track of uniform and other possessions, limited laundry facilities, and limited washing facilities [ 112 , 115 ]. Parents noted academic performance worsened following the onset of housing problems [ 111 , 113 , 116 ]. Limited space and time to do homework or revision [ 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 ], tiredness and poor sleep [ 111 , 113 ], travelling and disrupted routines [ 114 ], disruptions from other families (e.g. in a hostel) [ 114 ], a lack of internet connection [ 114 ], and the general impact of the housing disruption [ 111 , 113 , 116 ] made it challenging for those experiencing housing insecurity to do well at school. Families often had to wake up early to access shared facilities in emergency accommodation before school [ 113 , 114 ]. Some children and young people missed school altogether during periods of transience, due to multiple moves rendering attendance unviable [ 71 , 106 , 111 ], lack of a school place in the area [ 109 ], or not being able to afford transport and lunch money [ 81 ], which in turn affected academic performance [ 106 , 111 ].

‘Their education was put on hold. My daughter was ahead on everything in her class and she just went behind during those two weeks.’ ([ 111 ] , p.15)

Children and young people also experienced an impact on immediate family relationships. Housing insecurity led to reduced family wellbeing [ 82 ], and family relationships becoming more strained, for instance, due to spending more time at friends’ houses that were far away [ 15 ]. In some cases, however, housing insecurity led to improved family relationships, for instance, in terms of a non-resident father becoming more involved [ 15 ], or children feeling closer to their parents [ 106 ].

Some impacts related to the child’s health and wellbeing. Impacts on diet were reported, including refusal of solid food (which affected growth) [ 113 ], stress and repeated moves leading to not eating properly (which resulted in underweight) [ 91 ], insufficient money to eat properly [ 15 , 99 , 106 ], a lack of food storage and preparation space [ 102 , 103 , 112 ], and a hazardous food preparation environment [ 112 ]. Unsuitable temporary accommodation, including converted shipping containers, hostels, B&Bs and poorly maintained houses were particularly likely to be associated with a wide range of other well-being related impacts. Unsuitable accommodation presented various problems, including excessive heat, dripping water, overcrowding, damp, dirt, electrical hazards, vermin, flooding and a lack of washing and laundry facilities [ 41 , 67 , 71 , 74 , 76 , 77 , 81 , 87 , 88 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 109 , 112 , 116 ]. Moving could also impact on access to services and continuity of care, including being unable to register with general practitioners [ 82 ], and difficulty in maintaining continuity of medical care [ 65 ].

Psychological impacts of housing insecurity included feeling different from peers [ 115 ], feeling disappointed in each new property after being initially hopeful [ 15 ], and having trouble fitting in, in a new area [ 15 ]. Feeling insecure (including uncertainty over when and where the next move will be, or if another move is happening) was a further impact of living in insecure housing situations (including temporary housing, making multiple moves, being evicted) [ 15 , 87 , 90 , 114 , 116 ], leading to stress and worry [ 15 , 114 ].

One of the major issues that [she] says affects her mental health is the uncertainty of their situation. She says it is hard to not know where they will be staying one night to the next. It is also difficult to adjust to living without her furniture and clothes ( [ 114 ] , p.17)

Multiple moves, or anticipating a move, disrupted children and young people’s sense of continuity and led to the experience of a loss of security and stability more generally [ 15 , 85 , 87 ]. This led children and young people to feel responsible for helping and providing support to their parents, including hiding their feelings [ 111 , 114 ], or not requesting things be bought [ 15 , 113 ]. Children and young people also felt a sense of displacement and a lack of belonging [ 15 , 115 ]. Loss of stability and security triggered a desire for stability, to be able to settle, have friends over, and not have to worry about moving [ 109 ].

Housing insecurity also had a negative effect on parent-wellbeing, and this impacted the wellbeing of young people both directly [ 15 , 65 , 102 , 106 ] and indirectly through increased arguments and family stress [ 15 , 93 ] and reduced parental ability to care for children with chronic conditions [ 41 ]. Parents also perceived their reduced wellbeing as negatively impacting their children's development [ 41 ]. The threat of sanctions for missed housing payment could lead to reduced well-being among the whole family, characterised by feelings of despair, failure and a loss of hope [ 93 ].

Moving also had a financial impact on families. Moving into much smaller temporary accommodation meant that possessions had to be left behind, with the family having to pay for decorating, carpets, curtains and furniture each time they moved [ 15 , 84 , 98 , 104 , 105 ], incurring considerable debt [ 98 ]. If the new location was far away from school, family, friends and, in some cases, shops, then the family incurred travel costs [ 15 , 87 , 94 , 112 , 114 ]. Because of all this, children and young people’s requests for possessions or experiences (e.g., trips out) were refused [ 113 ].

Excessive noise was another disruption that children and young people experienced in connection with their precarious housing situation. Sources of noise were traffic on a main road [ 15 ] a factory nearby [ 110 ], or from other people in a B&B, hotel, hostel, or neighbouring properties [ 15 , 91 , 102 , 106 , 112 ], and could disrupt sleep and daily activities.

If their current conditions were sufficiently bad, some children and young people felt positively about moving, to leave negative things behind. For instance, a move could take them close to friends [ 15 ] or they may have more space in the new property [ 15 ]. Quite often, however, negative impacts of moving seemed to offset any benefit [ 90 ].

Frequent moves could impact on children and young people’s health and wellbeing in other ways. Space might be even more squeezed by cardboard boxes in preparation for an impending move [ 15 ]. Some children reported having to leave beloved pets behind [ 90 ]. Time costs associated with moving meant less time for other activities [ 15 ]. Multiple moves, particularly across local authority boundaries, could impact the family’s access to services [ 41 , 71 ], including health services [ 90 ], specialist healthcare required to manage children’s health conditions [ 83 ], and social services [ 85 , 93 ].

One key impact that overlaid all of the above but was rarely mentioned was a lack of choice or control [ 109 ]. This was inherent in the families’ and children/young people’s accounts of their experiences of housing insecurity, through talk of not knowing where their next move would be or when, and having to move long distances away from the places they used frequently and the people who supported them. Even the journey into housing insecurity was often outside of families’ control, such as increases in rent, change in income, or eviction notices (see ‘ Exposure ’). Families often could not improve properties in poor condition because they could not afford repairs to properties in poor condition, so felt they had to live with these problems [ 90 ]. Some families avoided reporting problems to the landlord for fear of a rent increase or eviction (see ‘ Exposure ’). Children and young people in particular felt that they lacked control over their housing situation, and in some cases were not aware of reasons for moves [ 15 ].

Several childhood health and wellbeing outcomes have been documented in relation to, and they are overwhelmingly negative. These consisted of mental health problems, physical health problems, tiredness, and stunted child development. Living in temporary housing, making multiple moves, and the instability and insecurity associated with anticipating a move, or being uncertain whether a move would be needed, had an obvious negative impact on the mental health of children and young people [ 41 , 63 , 79 , 107 ], including in terms of self-harm [ 71 , 96 , 97 , 107 , 111 ], thoughts of suicide [ 71 ], anxiety [ 71 , 90 , 103 , 111 , 112 , 115 ], and depression [ 110 , 115 ]. Sometimes these problems manifested as physical pain [ 106 ], nightmares [ 84 ], night waking [ 107 ], or wetting the bed [ 63 , 107 , 111 ]. Stress, anger, isolation, fear, worry about the future (including about having to move again), worry about safety and acute distress were also reported [ 15 , 63 , 73 , 79 , 82 , 84 , 89 , 90 , 96 , 109 , 114 , 115 , 118 ]. One child with distress/mental health problems (as a result of having to make multiple moves) stopped eating properly (resulting in underweight and anaemia), and became socially withdrawn [ 79 ]. Another child reported weight loss and mental health problems due to worry about the future housing situation [ 95 ]. One study reported on stress and anxiety in children due to the trauma of losing their home and the emergency accommodation being unsuitable and temporary [ 111 ].

‘My six year old has been going to the doctors because he’s developed a nervous tick since we’ve been in that room. He was constantly nervous all the time. He’s so unsettled still and he knows that we’re still not settled. He’s really anxious. He’s become violent […]’ ( [ 111 ] , p.13)

Sometimes children and young people’s mental health issues would be displayed through problematic behaviour such as withdrawal, stealing, smoking, drug-taking, aggressive behaviour, and running away [ 68 , 71 , 79 , 84 , 97 , 107 , 114 , 115 ]. Teachers observed that younger children tended to get more withdrawn and older children and young people tended to get more angry and antagonistic, although the same child could cycle between these two states [ 115 ]. Separation anxiety was also reported [ 87 , 111 ].

Children and young people also experienced physical health problems as a result of living in temporary accommodation, poor condition housing, and making multiple moves, including the development or exacerbation of asthma [ 69 , 81 , 90 ] and eczema [ 41 , 81 , 90 , 111 ], stomach bugs [ 71 ], insect bites [ 112 ], infectious diseases [ 41 , 109 , 112 ], headaches [ 113 ], stomach aches [ 109 , 113 ], exacerbation of long-term conditions [ 41 , 75 , 109 ], rashes and asthma as a result of damp [ 100 ], a dermatological condition as a result of living in a hotel [ 91 ], other physical symptoms in young children, such as coughing and vomiting [ 100 ] and musculoskeletal pain from sleeping in unsuitable places [ 102 ]. One study reported illness in a baby following a difficult birth, attributed to housing-related stress in the mother [ 83 ]. Rarer outcomes included weight gain due to a lack of cooking facilities and thus reliance on fast food, weight loss due to stress [ 79 , 95 ] and head lice due to close contact with others [ 115 ]. Some properties presented risk of injury to babies and young children [ 41 ].

Tiredness was also reported, in relation to travelling a long distance to school and to visit family and friends [ 15 , 66 , 77 , 102 , 112 , 115 ]. Tiredness also resulted from poor quality sleep due to the unsuitable nature of the accommodation (e.g., poor state of repair, overcrowded), sleeping on a sofa [ 102 ], and worrying about the housing situation [ 15 , 41 , 87 , 109 , 112 , 114 ].

Impacts on the perceived development of young children were reported, in particular in relation to having no space to play, which impacted standing/walking and emotional development [ 87 , 111 ], and multiple moves, which impacted on potty training and speech development [ 87 , 111 ]. One study reported an impact on growth due refusal of solid food [ 113 ].

Protective factors

Protective factors were not presented in the original conceptual framework. However, we identified specific protective factors that were perceived to lessen the impact of housing insecurity on wellbeing among children and adolescents. These included friendship, keeping the same school, normalising housing insecurity, home-making, having a plan, hope, protective parenting, and some interventions.

Friendship was a key protective factor. Retaining connections with friends and peer networks following moves was important [ 15 , 90 ], and school facilitated this [ 114 ]. Indeed, another related strategy was to keep children and young people enrolled in the same school during and after moves, to retain some stability [ 15 , 70 , 90 , 108 ].

Some sources noted that children and young people tended to normalise and destigmatise their housing insecurity as something to be expected given that the family is poor or receives benefits [ 15 , 62 , 90 ]. This response could be a coping/defence mechanism to try to deal with the negative impacts of being insecurely housed.

Another, more positive, coping strategy was to make the property feel more like a home. For instance, decorating the property could lead to children and young people feeling more settled and ‘at home’, even if the ultimate intention was to move [ 15 ]. Further coping strategies included having a plan of how things could go to keep anxiety at bay and retain some control [ 15 ], seeing the advantages of a location [ 15 ], and hoping for a better house next time, and/or hoping that the family would settle in a permanent home [ 15 ].

Parents also acted to protect children and young people from the negative impacts of housing insecurity, by concealing the full extent of their financial and housing problems [ 113 ], including children and young people in decision-making [ 70 , 90 ] (for instance, allowing children and young people to influence their parents’ decisions on location, where there was a choice [ 70 ]), and presenting their situation as an adventure [ 114 ]. One study also documented parents taking their children out to parks to give them space to run around [ 91 ].

Lastly, some positive findings were reported by an evaluation of the Families Intervention Project (FIP), for families at risk of eviction due to anti-social behaviour [ 118 ]. Families that worked closely with a multi-agency team experienced increased housing security, reduced stress and anxiety, and fewer behavioural problems among the children [ 118 ]. Another study reported positive effects of a peer-led parenting programme on children’s behaviour, although it is unclear how this impacted on their health and wellbeing [ 64 ].

Key findings relating to other populations

Families that have experienced domestic violence.

Domestic violence could be a source of housing insecurity both for families who leave the family home to seek safety and for those who stay. Families that leave can end up moving multiple times (and frequently), perhaps initially to a refuge and then into other forms of temporary housing, with families experiencing uncertainty over when the next move would be [ 90 , 105 ]. One study reported that experience of living in different places was perceived to be beneficial, although little detail was given, and this was offset by difficulty building peer networks [ 90 ]. In one family, the alternative to housing insecurity was for the children to be placed in local authority care, which was avoided through the children and other parent leaving the perpetrator [ 90 ].

Among families who stay in the family home (with the perpetrator leaving), housing insecurity could be created by the perpetrator refusing to pay the mortgage, leaving the family worried and uncertain:

‘ I’ve lost two stone, my son has lost ten pounds – he is only 15 – he is having counselling at school. It has just been a nightmare…He hasn’t paid the mortgage for a year because he wants to get me out so he can have the money… ’ ([ 95 ], p. 68). Friendship was particularly impacted among this population. To prevent the perpetrator from finding them, children were not able to disclose personal information [ 63 ]. This made it difficult to form close friendships.

Parents reported a lack of support offered to children and young people, including services that they needed [ 80 ]. However, where support was offered to parents and children/young people who had moved to escape abuse in their previous home, this support could improve wellbeing [ 63 , 79 , 80 ], acting as a protective factor. Particular forms of useful support included a parenting course [ 79 ] and supportive staff and peers at hostels [ 80 ]. Hostels offered a feeling of safety due to closed-circuit television [ 80 ]. One study reported that refuge and hostel staff were perceived as helpful but powerless to keep families safe in some cases, although children and young people found it helpful to talk and open up to staff about their situation [ 63 ]. One intervention, the Sanctuary scheme, allowed people experiencing/at risk of domestic violence to remain in their own home, with additional security [ 95 ].

Migrant, refugee and asylum seeker families

Migrant, refugee and asylum seeker families experienced similar forms of housing insecurity and similar impacts on everyday life and childhood health/wellbeing as did the general population. However, migrant/refugee families reported having to move suddenly, with very little notice (e.g., 48 h) [ 77 , 82 ]. They also lacked support from services and assistance with housing from the local authority. Consequently, families would end up homeless and have to beg friends to let them sleep on their sofas [ 101 ].

Once homeless, families slept in unsuitable locations, such as on the night bus, in a church, and in the waiting room of the Accident and Emergency (A&E) department. This led to extreme tiredness; in some cases, children were too tired to attend school [ 102 ]. That type of homelessness was a particular feature of the experience of housing insecurity among this population.

‘We had to keep going to McDonalds every night and we would also go to A&E. I would have to wear my school clothes and sleep like that.… They would say we have to sleep where the people wait but it’s just like lights […] The chairs were hard.’ (child aged 9) ( [ 102 ] , p. 22)

Other considerations specific to migrant/refugee/asylum seeker families were language barriers, which compounded the challenge of adjusting to a new area [ 82 ], and pressure to cook British food rather than food from their home country in communal facilities [ 106 ].

Families forced to relocate due to demolition

Two papers identified from the database search examined experiences of relocation; families were living in local authority accommodation in Glasgow and experienced a forced move as the high-rise block of flats they lived in was due to be demolished [ 69 , 70 ]. This forced location creates housing insecurity.

Despite the common source, however, housing insecurity was experienced in different ways by different families. One family reported not wanting to move as the children liked the area and their school and nursery, and one family was offered a flat but needed outdoor space [ 70 ]. Many families experienced the pre-relocation area as unsafe due to problematic behaviour in outdoor shared areas [ 69 ]. Because of this and no access to a private garden children lacked space to play [ 70 ]. Families also reported feeling shame in relation to the local area and the poor condition of their pre-relocation housing (a high-rise block of flats), and were keen to move to a less stigmatising area with better condition housing [ 69 , 70 ].

Most families managed to relocate to areas close enough for their children and young people to attend the same schools. However two families changed schools [ 69 , 70 ]. Children and young people felt shame and stigma relating to the local area and the flats themselves, with many young people reluctant to invite friends over, or others socialising in the corridor without inviting friends inside [ 70 ]. Thus, relocation could have positive impacts on families and children/young people. For three families, moving was a positive experience, with children and young people enjoying having a garden and growing to like their new neighbours and the area [ 69 ].

Although we anticipated potentially different experiences, impacts and outcomes relating to housing insecurity across the four populations, the evidence reviewed suggests many similarities. Some exposures were common to multiple populations, for instance, being evicted or having a forced move, living in temporary accommodation, experiencing overcrowding, exposure to problematic behaviour, poor condition/unsuitable property, and making multiple moves. Common impacts included social, school-related, psychological, financial and family wellbeing impacts, having to travel long distances to attend school and see friends, having to live in a property that was unsuitable or in a poor state of repair, overcrowded and often noisy, all of which could then further exacerbate housing insecurity. Outcomes reported across multiple populations included mental health problems (which could manifest in physical ways, for example, trouble eating and sleeping, or wetting the bed) and physical health problems such as skin complaints and asthma related to poor housing conditions. Protective factors common to multiple populations included friendship and support, staying at the same school, having hope for the future, and parenting practices. Pervasive throughout all populations and accounts was an overall lack of choice or control over the housing situation and poverty as a driving force.

These findings support and build upon previous literature that has examined the impact of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children and young people, in terms of reduced mental and psychological wellbeing [ 21 , 42 , 43 ], ill health relating to homelessness or poor housing conditions [ 40 , 41 ], and disrupted family processes [ 38 ]. Likewise, the findings build upon prior cohort studies that support a causal relationship with child health [ 38 ], by highlighting the details of the hardships faced by children and young people experiencing housing insecurity and exploring relationships between exposures, ‘less tangible’ impacts and health and wellbeing outcomes.

Many elements of the Children’s Society definition of housing insecurity were identifiable in our review findings. A key element of housing insecurity is financial insecurity [ 17 , 19 ]; this was borne out in our findings where families were frequently exposed to high/rising costs of housing or reduced income. Indeed, our review found that families incurred additional costs due to multiple and/or frequent moves and/or moving into temporary accommodation. This could potentially increase financial insecurity, thus creating a vicious circle of housing insecurity and poverty. Having ‘a home that does not provide a sense of safety and security’ ([ 18 ], paragraph 3) was evident when children and young people reported not feeling safe in their accommodation, and relational insecurity was evident in families’ accounts of being moved far from friends, school and support networks.

In addition, we identified certain population-specific considerations. Families experiencing domestic violence faced a difficult choice between choosing to remain in the property and leaving the property, both with insecurity attached. Housing insecurity negatively impacted on friendships for all populations, however this could be potentially more challenging for those escaping domestic violence, due to the need to keep personal information confidential in order to maintain family safety.

Parents and children/young people in migrant, refugee and asylum seeker populations spoke of having very little notice before having to move out of a property, sometimes only 48 h. This created a housing emergency, captured in accounts of families becoming homeless and having to sleep in unsuitable places, such as the Accident and Emergency department waiting room or on a night bus. In some families, parents had no recourse to public funds, so even when children and young people were born in the UK, the family still ended up destitute and homeless, leading to significant worry.

A key factor in relocation was that families were forced to move by a particular date, as the high-rise block they lived in was scheduled for demolition. Many families desired a move, due to a lack of space, overcrowding, and unsafe outdoor spaces. However many did not want to leave behind social networks and schools in the community, and even some who wanted to move had difficulty finding a suitable property (e.g., for their family size).

A key challenge to synthesising the evidence was the complexity of the data, in particular the relationships between exposures and impacts. Factors that families initially experienced as exposures could then become impacts, and particular impacts could then worsen housing insecurity, in a cyclical fashion. For instance, overcrowded conditions could precipitate a move, but then the only property available may be in a poor state of repair, with intolerable living conditions, thus prompting a further move. Another key challenge in synthesising the qualitative evidence was that many elements of the experience of housing insecurity that were experienced simultaneously by children and young people have been artificially separated within the updated conceptual frameworks, making analysis problematic. For instance, those living in poor-condition temporary accommodation may want to move due the poor state of a property, but be worried about where they may end up next and whether children/young people will have to change schools and move far from friends. Such complexity has proved challenging to our overall synthesis. Policymakers and practitioners should be aware that the diagrams illustrating the hypothesised causal pathways simplify the multiple inter-related factors related to housing insecurity that impact on the wellbeing of children and young people. Identifiable common stresses including poverty, financial difficulties and debt, immigration/refugee status and domestic abuse will also exert direct significant effects on family wellbeing that prove difficult to separate from those directly due to housing insecurity.

Limitations

Limitations of the evidence base.

We have identified numerous literature sources, many rich with data relating to the experiences of children and young people, and synthesised these data into diagrams that illustrate hypothesised causal pathways within the original conceptual framework, with accompanying descriptions of the experiences of housing insecurity in children and young people. However, we cannot establish claims for the comprehensiveness of our diagrams that map hypothesised causal pathways from housing insecurity to childhood health/wellbeing based on the original conceptual framework. We mapped associations where they were present in the accounts of children/young people and other informants. However, the evidence base may have missed other potential associations, particularly for populations covered by a small number of studies.

Within the evidence base, accounts from parents or other informants proved extremely useful in examining the impacts of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children and young people, particularly for younger children who are not able to yet articulate their experiences and feelings. Nevertheless, such accounts proved an insufficient substitute for rich and nuanced data directly from the children and young people themselves. Our public involvement group have informed us that children and young people may find it difficult to talk about their housing situation, and noted that we did not identify any research that explicitly examined the perspectives of young people who provide care for a parent.

Likewise, little available information relates to the health and wellbeing of children and young people, and it is difficult to establish whether the evidence we have reviewed has captured all relevant health and wellbeing experiences. The majority of the accounts of young people focused on the impacts (or intermediate outcomes) of housing insecurity, which means that we have been able to present a rich picture of these ‘less tangible’ impacts, but also that the links from these impacts to health and wellbeing outcomes is less well understood. For instance, our public involvement group noted that we had not reported any evidence relating to bullying as a result of experiencing housing insecurity.

Strengths and limitations of the review

Strengths of our review method include the prior use of a conceptual model, developed in consultation with stakeholders and topic experts, and examination of key policy documents, which guided the process of synthesis. Synthesis was thus both deductive (i.e., informed by the a priori conceptual model) and inductive (i.e., conducted using established thematic synthesis methods), which allowed for an organised and yet rich and nuanced picture of the impacts of housing insecurity on health and wellbeing among children and young people in the UK. The review was conducted by an established team of experienced reviewers and a methodologist.

A key limitation is that literature sources were far more plentiful than anticipated, including numerous long and detailed reports identified through grey literature searching. While this enhanced the richness of the dataset, it also expanded the review workload, leading to additional time constraints. Limited time and resource could be allocated for double-checking full texts (in particular in the grey literature) and extractions, and thus only a sample were double-checked. Time constraints also prevented citation searches of key included studies. Nevertheless, such an approach remains consistent with established rapid review methods with minimal consequences for missing or mis-reported evidence [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Time and resource constraints also prohibited examination of how experiences may differ according to location within the UK.

Implications for policy

It is important that decisions made about housing at a national and local level reflect the impacts that insecure housing can have on children and young people, and ensures that housing insecurity is prevented in the first place. The current review findings suggest that policies should focus on reducing housing insecurity in its totality among families. One way to do this is to focus on eviction, which is a significant cause of instability and a leading cause of households seeking homelessness assistance [ 25 ]. This could include ending no-fault evictions, as has been done in Scotland for private renters since 2017 and as proposed, but yet to be introduced by the UK government in 2019. Scotland’s introduction of longer tenancy agreements with the removal of no-fault evictions may also facilitate families being able to settle and reduce the need for multiple moves. Similarly, legislating for minimum standards in the private rented sector, as currently being explored [ 119 ], will protect children and young people from being exposed to unhealthy and dangerous conditions.

Other changes could include (1) stipulating minimum requirements for space in family properties and minimum requirements for property conditions; (2) advocating for families living in the private rental sector to improve their housing situation; (3) reducing the use of short-term tenancies so families are not required to make multiple moves; (4) providing affordable housing options that give families more choice; and (5) engaging families in the design of systems and services that meet their housing needs. Addressing poverty more widely should also help to alleviate housing insecurity among families in the UK, as much of the evidence reported on how poverty initiated and/or exacerbated housing insecurity, for instance, by restricting choice and by increasing worry. However, any changes will need adequate support for enforcement, something made clear by the limited effectiveness of policy introduced to protect people from revenge/retaliatory eviction [ 97 , 120 , 121 , 122 ], improve the quality and suitability of temporary accommodation, and, where possible, reduce the need for temporary accommodation through preventative measures.

Among families escaping domestic violence, support systems are needed to avoid destitution caused by the perpetrator (e.g., not paying the mortgage). There should also be systems in place to ensure that families are housed in a permanent residence as soon as possible following the initial placement in emergency temporary accommodation after leaving the family home, with as few moves as possible. Appropriate support with housing should be made available to refugee/asylum seeker/migrant families, including those where the parents have no recourse to public funds, and short-notice and long-distance moves should be avoided, particularly where these take families away from their support systems and communities.

Implications for practice

Where possible, interventions to reduce or eliminate housing insecurity should be implemented. Where this is not possible, interventions should focus on reducing the impact of housing insecurity, for instance, by ensuring long journeys can be avoided, that accommodation is of a decent standard, and by providing adequate support to families and children young people. Practitioners who work to house families should prioritise stable, suitable and good quality housing. Practitioners who interact with children and young people experiencing housing insecurity and homelessness (e.g., clinicians, teachers, social workers) should recognise the complexity of the children and young people’s experiences, including how the situation and circumstances (e.g., escaping domestic violence, migration status) might impact on their health and wellbeing, and that impacts vary on an individual basis, particularly in assessments and family support plans. A multiagency approach should be utilised with families to mitigate the impacts of housing insecurity, poor housing conditions or unsuitable housing. Practitioners should consider the impacts of continuity of school, support and services, and the need for mental health support, parenting and counselling, for instance through providing support with transport to enable children and young people to stay at their current school, and support to maintain friendships. All those working with children/young people and families experiencing housing insecurity should consider ways to offer them optimal choice and control over situations that affect them.

All practitioners and professionals (e.g., teachers) who work with children and young people from families who have escaped domestic violence should ensure that the children and young people are receiving appropriate support from all relevant services, and that appropriate safety measures are in place to protect the family from the perpetrator.

Research recommendations

Future qualitative research could focus explicitly on the health and wellbeing of children and young people experiencing housing insecurity, and how they link with the impacts and outcomes identified in the current review. In particular, research could explore how the health and wellbeing of children and young people are affected by the impacts of housing insecurity on friendships, education, food and hygiene, financial impacts, long journeys, overcrowding, perceived safety, and access to services. Further qualitative research could examine the impact of interventions to address housing insecurity among families in the UK. Interventions with a participatory component that seek to ensure that the voices of children and young people remain central should be prioritised for further research. The voices of specific groups of young people who are likely to be marginalised (e.g., young carers) could be explored in future research. Future qualitative research should report methods of recruitment and data collection and analysis clearly and transparently, and should incorporate meaningful research reflexivity.

Conclusions

Housing insecurity has a profound impact on children and young people in families in the UK. Such housing insecurity can take many forms and result from often inter-related situations that are fundamentally connected to poverty. The resultant housing insecurity can have multiple (often simultaneous) impacts, including those that relate to educational, psychological, financial and family wellbeing impacts, having to travel long distances to attend school and see friends, and having to live in unsuitable, poorly repaired, overcrowded or noisy properties, any of which further exacerbate housing insecurity. Negative experiences can impact on health and wellbeing, in terms of mental health problems (which could manifest in physical ways) and physical health problems, as well as tiredness and developmental issues. Some experiences and situations can lessen the impact of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children and young people. Negative impacts of housing insecurity on health and wellbeing may be further compounded by specific situations and life circumstances, such as escaping domestic violence, being a migrant, refugee or asylum seeker (or having a parent with that status), or experiencing a forced relocation due to housing demolition.

Availability of data and materials

All data presented in this review were already published, either in an academic journal, or a report that is publicly available. Search strings are available in Additional File 1. Data extracted from the published papers and reports included in the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

the main social security payment in the UK; for more information see https://www.gov.uk/universal-credit

Abbreviations

Accident and Emergency (Department)

Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance

Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts

Bed and Breakfast (accommodation)

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme

Coronavirus Disease 2019

Families Intervention Project

United Kingdom

International Bibliography of the Social Sciences

National Institute for Health and Care Research

International prospective register of systematic reviews

Davey Smith G, Hart C, Blane D, Hole D. Adverse socioeconomic conditions in childhood and cause specific adult mortality: Prospective observational study. BMJ. 1998;316:1631–5.

Article   Google Scholar  

Swope CB, Hernandez D. Housing as a determinant of health equity: A conceptual model. Soc Sci Med. 2019;243: 112571.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Weitzman M, Baten A, Rosenthal DG, Hoshino R, Tohn E, Jacobs DE. Housing and child health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013;43(8):187–224.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Kohler L. Child public health: A new basis for child health workers. Eur J Public Health. 1998;8:253–5.

Cresswell T. What is child public health? Curr Paediatr. 2004;14(7):612–8.

Braubach M, Jacobs DE, Ormandy D. Environmental burden of disease associated with inadequate housing. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011.

Google Scholar  

Clair A. Housing: an Under-Explored Influence on Children’s Well-Being and Becoming. Child Indic Res. 2019;12:609–26.

Dockery M, Kendall G, Li J, Mahendran A, Ong R, Strazdins L. Housing and children’s development and wellbeing: a scoping study. AHURI Final Report No. 149. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited; 2010.

Evans GW, Saltzman H, Cooperman JL. Housing quality and children’s socioemotional health. Environ Behav. 2001;33(3):389–99.

Gehrt D, Hafner M, Grollov ST, Christoffersen J, editors. Impacts of the indoor environment in our homes and schools on child health: A novel analysis using the EU-SILC Database. 17th International Healthy Buildings Conference; 2021 21–23 June 2021; Oslo: SINTEF Academic Press.

Mansour A, Bentley R, Baker E, Li A, Martino E, Clair A, et al. Housing and health: an updated glossary. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022;76(9):833–8.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

World Health Organization. Housing and health guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

Shaw M. Housing and public health. Ann Rev Public Health. 2004;25:397–418.

Clark WAV. Life events and moves under duress: disruption in the life course and mobility outcomes. Longitudinal Life Course Stud. 2016;7(3):218–39.

The Children’s Society. Moving, Always Moving: The normalisation of housing insecurity among children in low income households in England. London: The Children’s Society; 2020.

Burgard SA, Seefeldt KS, Zelner S. Housing instability and health: findings from the Michigan Recession and Recovery Study. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2215–24.

Kushel MB, Gupta R, Gee L, Haas JS. Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(1):71–7.

Public Health England. Improving health through the home. 2017. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/improving-health-through-the-home/improving-health-through-the-home . Accessed Aug 2022.

Preece J, Bimpson E. Housing and Insecurity and Mental Health in Wales. Glasgow: CaCHE, University of Glasgow; 2019.

Jelleyman T, Spencer N. Residential mobility in childhood and health outcomes: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(7):584–92.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Glasheen C, Forman-Hoffman V, Hedden S, Ridenour T, Wang J, Porter J. Residential transience among US adolescents: association with depression and mental health treatment. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019;28(6):682–91.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

National Children’s Bureau. Housing and the health of young children: policy and evidence briefing for the VCSE sector. 2016. Available from: https://www.ncb.org.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/files/Housing%2520and%2520the%2520Health%2520of%2520Young%2520Children.pdf . Accessed Aug 2022.

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Housing Instability. 2020. Available from: https://wayback.archive-it.org/5774/20220414161055/https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-determinants-health/interventions-resources/housing-instability . Accessed Aug 2022.

Harris J, McKee J. Health and wellbeing in the private rented sector. Part 1: Literature review and policy analysis. Bristol: UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence (CaCHE); 2021.

Wilson W, Cromarty H. Applying as homeless from an assured shorthold tenancy (England). House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. 06856; 2020. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06856/ . Accessed Aug 2022.

Cheetham M, Moffatt S, Addison M, Wiseman A. Impact of Universal Credit in North East England: a qualitative study of claimants and support staff. Bmj Open. 2019;9:e029611. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029611 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Williams R, Bell A, Garratt E, Pryce G. Understanding the effect of universal credit on housing insecurity in England: a difference-in-differences approach. Hous Stud. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2146066 .

Hardie I. Welfare reform and housing insecurity: the impact of Universal Credit rollout on demand for rent arrears and homelessness advice from Citizens Advice in England. Soc Policy Soc. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000379 .

Gov.uk Benefit cap: number of households capped to May 2023. 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/benefit-cap-number-of-households-capped-to-may-2023 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Gov.uk Benefit cap: estimated impact on parents, by age of youngest child 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/benefit-cap-estimated-impact-on-parents-by-age-of-youngest-child . Accessed Aug 2022.

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Benefit Cap Data to February 2018. 2018. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/704234/benefit-cap-statistics-feb-2018.pdf . Accessed Aug 2022.

Hilditch M. One in three councils took children into care due to homelessness. Inside Housing. 2016. Available from: https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/one-in-three-councils-took-children-into-care-due-to-homelessness-48690 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Child Poverty Action Group. Post-Covid Policy: Child Poverty, Social Security and Housing. London: Child Poverty Action Group; 2021.

Fairbrother H, Woodrow N, Crowder M, Holding E, Griffin N, Er V, et al. “It All Kind of Links Really”: Young People’s Perspectives on the Relationship between Socioeconomic Circumstances and Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3679.

Joseph Rowntree Foundation. As 400,000 renters face evictions, JRF warns the UK risks a two-tier recovery. 2021. Available from: https://www.jrf.org.uk/news/as-400000-renters-face-eviction-jrf-warns-the-uk-risks-a-two-tier-recovery . Accessed Aug 2022.

Broadbent P, Thomson R, Kopasker D, McCartney G, Meier P, Richiardi M, et al. The public health implications of the cost-of-living crisis: outlining mechanisms and modelling consequences. Lancet Regional Health Eur. 2023; 27:100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100585 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Allard M. “I don’t know what the winter’s going to bring:” experiences of homelessness during a cost of living crisis. London: Crisis; 2022.

Bess K, Miller A, Mehdipanah R. The effects of housing insecurity on children’s health: a scoping review. Health Promotion Int. 2022;38(3):daac006. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac006 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Li Y, Bentley R, Singh A, Fleitas Alfonzo A, editors. Housing disadvantage in childhood and health: a systematic review. Society for Social Medicine Annual Scientific Meeting. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2021;50(Suppl 1):dyab168.384. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab168.384 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Rolfe S, Garnham L, Godwin J, Anderson I, Seaman P, Donaldson C. Housing as a social determinant of health and wellbeing: developing an empirically-informed realist theoretical framework. Bmc Public Health. 2020;20(1):1138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09224-0 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Poverty and child health: views from the frontline. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 2017.

Rollings KA, Wells NM, Evans GW, Bednarz A, Yang Y. Housing and neighborhood physical quality: Children’s mental health and motivation. J Environ Psychol. 2017;50:17–23.

Suglia SF, Chambers E, Sandel MT. Poor housing quality and housing instability. In: The social determinants of mental health. VA, United States: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2015. p. 171–92.

Cutts DB, Meyers AF, Black MM, Casey PH, Chilton M, Cook JT, et al. US housing insecurity and the health of very young children. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1508–14.

Dong M, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Williamson DF, Dube SR, Brown DW, et al. Childhood residential mobility and multiple health risks during adolescence and adulthood: the hidden role of adverse childhood experiences. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(12):1104–10.

Brown D, Benzeval M, Gayle V, Macintyre S, O’Reilly D, Leyland AH. Childhood residential mobility and health in late adolescence and adulthood: findings from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2012;66(10):942–50.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Pearce A, Elliman D, Bedford H, Law C. Residential mobility and uptake of childhood immunisations: Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Vaccine. 2008;26(13):1675–80.

Clair A, Reeves A, McKee M, Stuckler D. Constructing a housing precariousness measure for Europe. J Eur Soc Policy. 2019;29(1):13–28.

Bone J. Neoliberal nomads: Housing insecurity and the revival of private renting in the UK. Sociological Research Online. 2014;19(4):1–4.

Kelly S, Moher D, Clifford T. Defining rapid reviews: A modified Delphi consensus approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32(4):265–75.

Tricco AC, Antony J, Zarin W, Strifler L, Ghassemi M, Ivory J, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1–15.

Tricco AC, Zarin W, Antony J, Hutton B, Moher D, Sherifali D, et al. An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:61–7.

Ayiku L, Levay P, Hudson T, Finnegan A. The NICE UK geographic search filters for MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid): Post-development study to further evaluate precision and number-needed-to-read when retrieving UK evidence. Res Synthesis Methods. 2020;11:669–77.

Stansfield C, Dickson K, Bangpan M. Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? Syst Rev. 2016;5:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0371-9 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Qualitative Checklist [online]. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme; 2022. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ . Accessed Sept 2022.

Tyndall J. AACODS Checklist.: Flinders Univeristy; 2010. Available from: https://dspace.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2328/3326/AACODS_Checklist.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y . Accessed Sept 2022.

Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-29 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Shaw L, Nunns M, Briscoe S, Anderson R, Thompson CJ. A “Rapid Best-Fit” model for framework synthesis: Using research objectives to structure analysis within a rapid review of qualitative evidence. Res Synt Methods. 2021;12(3):368–83.

Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 . Accessed Aug 2022.

Gudde CB, Olsø TM, Whittington RSV. Service users’ experiences and views of aggressive situations in mental health care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. J Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2015;3(8):449–62.

Levitt HM. How to conduct a qualitative meta-analysis: Tailoring methods to enhance methodological integrity. Psychother Res. 2018;28(3):367–78.

Backett-Milburn K, Cunningham-Burley S, Davis J. Contrasting lives, contrasting views? understandings of health inequalities from children in differing social circumstances. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(4):613–23.

Bowyer L, Swanston J, Vetere A. “Eventually you just get used to it”: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of 10–16 year-old girls’ experiences of the transition into temporary accommodation after exposure to domestic violence perpetrated by men against their mothers. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;20(2):304–23.

Bradley C, Day C, Penney C, Michelson D. “Every day is hard, being outside, but you have to do it for your child”: Mixed-methods formative evaluation of a peer-led parenting intervention for homeless families. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;25(4):860–76.

Centre CCL. Growing Up In A Hostile Environment: The rights of undocumented migrant children in the UK. London: Coram Children’s Legal Centre; 2013.

Dexter Z, Capron L, Gregg L. Making Life Impossible: How the needs of destitute migrant children are going unmet. London: The Children’s Society; 2016.

Jolly A. No Recourse to Social Work? Statutory Neglect, Social Exclusion and Undocumented Migrant Families in the UK. Soc Inclusion. 2018;6(3):190–200.

Karim K, Tischler V, Gregory P, Vostanis P. Homeless children and parents: Short-term mental health outcome. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006;52(5):447–58.

Lawson L, Kearns A, Egan M, Conway E. “You Can’t Always Get What You Want…”? Prior-Attitudes and Post-Experiences of Relocation from Restructured Neighbourhoods. Housing Studies. 2015;30(6):942–66.

Lawson L, Kearns A. “Power to the (young) people”? Children and young people’s empowerment in the relocation process associated with urban re-structuring. Int J Hous Policy. 2016;16(3):376–403.

Minton A, Jones S. Generation squalor: Shelter’s national investigation into the housing crisis. London: Shelter; 2005.

Moffatt S, Lawson S, Patterson R, Holding E, Dennison A, Sowden S, et al. A qualitative study of the impact of the UK “bedroom tax.” J Public Health. 2016;38(2):197–205.

Nettleton S, Burrows R. When a capital investment becomes an emotional loss: The health consequences of the experience of mortgage possession in England. Hous Stud. 2000;15(3):463–79.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Causes of homelessness amongst ethnic minority populations. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2005.

Oldman C, Beresford B. Home, sick home: Using the housing experiences of disabled children to suggest a new theoretical framework. Hous Stud. 2000;15(3):429–42.

Price J, Spencer S. Safeguarding children from destitution: Local authority responses to families with “no recourse to public funds.” Oxford: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, University of Oxford; 2015.

Rowley L, Morant N, Katona C. Refugees Who Have Experienced Extreme Cruelty: A Qualitative Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing after Being Granted Leave to Remain in the UK. J Immigr Refug Stud. 2020;18(4):357–74.

Thompson C, Lewis DJ, Greenhalgh T, Smith NR, Fahy AE, Cummins S. “I don’t know how I’m still standing” a Bakhtinian analysis of social housing and health narratives in East London. Soc Sci Med. 2017;177:27–34.

Tischler V, Karim K, Rustall S, Gregory P, Vostanis P. A family support service for homeless children and parents: users’ perspectives and characteristics. Health Soc Care Community. 2004;12(4):327–35.

Tischler V, Rademeyer A, Vostanis P. Mothers experiencing homelessness: mental health, support and social care needs. Health Soc Care Community. 2007;15(3):246–53.

Tod AM, Nelson P, De Chavez AC, Homer C, Powell-Hoyland V, Stocks A. Understanding influences and decisions of households with children with asthma regarding temperature and humidity in the home in winter: A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e009636.

Warfa N, Bhui K, Craig T, Curtis S, Mohamud S, Stansfeld S, et al. Post-migration geographical mobility, mental health and health service utilisation among Somali refugees in the UK: A qualitative study. Health Place. 2006;12(4):503–15.

Watt P. Gendering the right to housing in the city: Homeless female lone parents in post-Olympics, austerity East London. Cities. 2018;76:43–51.

Wilcox P. Lone motherhood: the impact on living standards of leaving a violent relationship. Social Policy & Administration. 2000;34(2):176–90.

Young Women’s Trust. On the edge: Life for young women on low incomes in London. London: Young Women’s Trust; 2020.

Children’s Commissioner for England. Changing the odds in the early years. London: Children’s Commissioner for England; 2017.

Children’s Commissioner for England. Bleak houses: Tackling the crisis of family homelessness in England. London: Children’s Commissioner for England; 2019.

Children’s Commissioner. “Are we there yet?” Our rights, our say: A report for the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. London: Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland, Children’s Commissioner for Wales, Northern Ireland Commissioner for Children and Young People, and Children’s Commissioner for England; 2020.

Children’s Commissioner for England. The big ask, the big answer. London: Children’s Commissioner for England; 2021.

The Children’s Society. Understanding childhoods: Growing up in hard times. London: The Children’s Society; 2017.

The Children’s Society. A lifeline for all: Children and families with no recourse to public funds. London: The Children’s Society; 2020.

Child Poverty Action Group and Church of England. Poverty in the pandemic: the impact of coronavirus on lowincome families and children. London: Child Poverty Action Group; 2020.

Child Poverty Action Group. The safety net is gone: Understanding the impact of poverty on the lives of children and families in England: a survey of social workers. London: Child Poverty Action Group; 2020.

Hardy K, Gillespie T. Homelessness, health and housing: Participatory action research in East London. The Sociological Review Foundation: Lancaster; 2016.

Jones A, Bretherton J, Bowles R, Croucher K. The effectiveness of schemes to enable households at risk of domestic violence to remain in their homes: Research report. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010. p. 2010.

Joshi P, Wallace E, Williams L. Young children’s and families’ experiences of services aimed at reducing the impact of low-income: Participation work with children and families. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner; 2015.

Clarke A, Hamilton C, Jones M, Muir K. Poverty, evictions and forced moves. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2017.

Croucher K, Quilgars D, Dyke A. Housing and life experiences: making a home on a low income. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2018.

Joseph Rowntree Foundation. UK Poverty 2020/21: The leading independent report. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2021.

Action M. Maternal health: Exploring the lived experiences of pregnant women seeking asylum. London: Maternity Action; 2022.

Project 17. “In the night we didn’t know where we were going”: Project 17’s Hotel Fund. London: Project 17; 2018.

Project 17. Not seen, not heard: Children’s experiences of the hostile environment. London: Project 17; 2019.

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Poverty & Us - parents, carers and young people tell us how poverty impacts them. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 2017.

Renters’ Reform Coalition. Safe, secure and affordable homes for all: A renters’ blueprint for reform: Renters’ Reform Coalition. 2022.

Scottish Women’s Aid. Change, justice, fairness: “Why should we have to move everywhere and everything because of him?” Edinburgh: Scottish Women’s Aid; 2015.

Shelter. Listen up: The voices of homeless children. London: Shelter; 2004.

Shelter. Toying with their future: The hidden cost of the housing crisis. London: Shelter; 2004.

Shelter. Policy: Briefing. Homes fit for families? The case for stable private renting. London: Shelter; 2012.

Shelter. A Roof Over My Head: The final report of the Sustain project. London: Shelter; 2014.

Shelter. Sick and tired: The impact of temporary accommodation on the health of homeless families. London: Shelter; 2004.

Shelter. ‘This is no place for a child’: the experiences of homeless families in emergency accommodation. London: Shelter; 2015.

Shelter. Desperate to escape: the experiences of homeless families in emergency accommodation. London: Shelter; 2016.

Shelter. The experiences of people in housing debt. London: Shelter; 2016.

Shelter. ‘We’ve got no home’: The experiences of homeless children in emergency accommodation. London: Shelter; 2017.

Shelter. Impacts of homelessness on children – research with teachers. London: Shelter; 2017.

Shelter. Building our future: A vision for social housing. London: Shelter; 2018.

Shelter. Health of one in five renters harmed by their home. London: Shelter; 2021. Available from: https://england.shelter.org.uk/media/press_release/health_of_one_in_five_renters_harmed_by_their_home . Accessed Aug 2022.

White C, Warrener M, Reeves A, La Valle I. Family Intervention Projects: An Evaluation of their Design, Set-up and Early Outcomes. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families; 2008. Contract No.: DCSF-RW047.

Gov.uk. A Decent Homes Standard in the private rented sector: consultation. 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/a-decent-homes-standard-in-the-private-rented-sector-consultation/a-decent-homes-standard-in-the-private-rented-sector-consultation . Accessed Aug 2022.

Marsh A, Gibb K. The private rented sector in the UK. Glasgow: UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence; 2019.

Moore T, Dunning R. Regulation of the private rented sector in England using lessons from Ireland. York: JRF Report, Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2017.

Walsh E. Repair in the private rented sector: where now? J Property Plann Environ Law. 2021;13(1):46–59.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Katie Lewis and Liz Kitchin from the University of Sheffield for providing administrative support to the project, Karen Horrocks, from the UK Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, for revising the policy and practice implications, anonymous young people who provided PPI feedback on a lay summary and gave us an insight into key omissions from the evidence base, and Mary Crowder from the University of Sheffield for her support in accessing feedback from PPI members at a local youth organisation. We would also like to thank the policy and practice stakeholders and topic experts with whom we consulted to develop the initial conceptual framework.

This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health programme (project reference 18/93 PHR Public Health Review Team). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Emma S. Hock, Lindsay Blank, Hannah Fairbrother, Mark Clowes, Diana Castelblanco Cuevas, Andrew Booth & Elizabeth Goyder

Australian Centre for Housing Research, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

EH led the review, and undertook study selection, grey literature searching and selection, data extraction, quality assessment and coding, drafted the synthesis, and drafted and refined large parts of the manuscript. LB undertook study selection, data extraction, quality assessment and coding, compiled study characteristics, checked and refined the synthesis, and drafted and refined parts of the manuscript. HF undertook study selection, grey literature searching and selection, data extraction and quality assessment, co-ordinated patient and public involvement, provided topic expertise, checked and refined the synthesis, and drafted and refined parts of the manuscript. MC designed the search strategy, undertook database searches and drafted and refined parts of the manuscript. DCC undertook study selection and drafted and refined parts of the manuscript. AB provided methodological support and advice, checked and refined the synthesis, and drafted and refined parts of the manuscript. AC provided topic expertise and drafted and refined parts of the manuscript. EG undertook stakeholder consultation and protocol development, drafted and refined parts of the manuscript, and was the guarantor of the review. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma S. Hock .

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate.

Ethical approval was not required for this study because no human participants were involved.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AB is a Cochrane author and co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group, and was also previously a member of the NIHR Evidence Synthesis Advisory Group from 2018 to 2022 and a member of the NIHR HS&DR Funding Board from 2018 to 2022. No other authors have competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary material 1., supplementary material 2., supplementary material 3., supplementary material 4., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Hock, E.S., Blank, L., Fairbrother, H. et al. Exploring the impact of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children and young people in the United Kingdom: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Public Health 24 , 2453 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19735-9

Download citation

Received : 22 May 2023

Accepted : 08 August 2024

Published : 09 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19735-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Systematic review
• Housing insecurity, Housing instability
• Adolescents
• Young people

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Social Issues of Families in Poverty Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Issue #1: Parental Stress and Mental Health

Identification of the issue.

Poverty is a state where one lacks adequate resources to meet all essential human needs. Families living in poverty are unable to save some money for investment or for emergency purposes. In essence, families living in poverty spend at least 75% of their income on food, shelter, and clothing. Parental stress and mental health have a causal link with poverty. With the tightened budget, parents of the families living in poverty struggle to make ends meet, and in the course of their struggles, they experience many stresses and depressions.

The toughened struggles lead to irritability of the parenting role as a whole, and this causes the entire family to experience some mental distresses. Financial stresses increase the parents’ emotional distresses, and the parents are unable to respond sensitively to the children’s needs. Parents end up being harsh, inconsistence and non-responsive. With the above-mentioned living conditions, the children’s mental health is affected. The children live in denial; they relate poorly with their peers from elite families, and they perform poorly in schools.

Rational interventions

As evident, the families living in poverty are those from the minority ethnic communities. These families need family strengthening interventions and family support services. It is noteworthy that these services are available; however, they are not readily accessible to most of the families living in poverty. An intervention to make the services readily available and accessible would help in addressing the issue. The service providers can offer the services in venues that the target audience can readily access.

Moreover, time is a very important aspect to the families living in poverty. Since most of the parents spend the entire day doing manual jobs to earn a living, the family support services would work perfectly if scheduled to take place during the evenings. Moreover, most of the families living in poverty are those from minority ethnic groups, and thus, they suffer from inferiority complex.

Therefore, the family-support service providers ought to be resilient. They may receive several setbacks from the target audience, but they ought to find ways to win the trust of the members of the families living in poverty. They should find a way to overcome the prejudice regarding members with mental disabilities and those with difficulties in learning.

The most important lesson that the members of the families living in poverty should learn is the coping strategies. The parents should learn how to respond to their children, and thus improve their relationship with the children despite the toughened economic conditions.

The parents ought to learn several skills; efficient conflict resolution skills, child centered parenting skills, efficient budgetary skills, enhanced emotional functioning skills, and the principles of developing healthy relationships. On the other hand, the children ought to learn how to remain resilient despite the massive poverty related stresses. The family strengthening interventions should help parents and children living in poverty to learn how to develop safe and healthy relationships in spite of the adverse effects of poverty.

Cost and benefits of the proposed interventions

The above named interventions would cost the government quite some large amount of money. Further, the involved service providers will have to work extra hard to make sure they attain their goals. They may have to work for extra hours to convince the parents to adhere to certain aspects.

The service providers may experience several setbacks from their target audience, and thus, they have to be resilient throughout the exercise. However, the benefits associated outweigh the costs. If the parents and the children living in poverty adhere to the teachings, the parental stresses, economic stresses, and emotional stresses that lead to mental health issues would decrease drastically.

Issue #2: Food Insecurity and Hunger

Food is a basic need for human survival; however, the fact that not all families can afford quality and quantity food is very distressing. Food and nutrition determines the health status of an individual. However, families living in poverty do not access the right amount of food to replenish the body’s nutrition requirements. Therefore, members of families living in poverty suffer from malnutrition. Poverty, food insecurity and hunger are somewhat related. Children of families living in poverty are prone to nutrition inadequacy ailments.

In America, there are minority ethnic communities that suffer from food insecurity and hunger. Insecure and non-lucrative jobs are the core causes of extreme poverty levels. American is a first class nation, and one would not expect to find families suffering from adverse poverty, food insecurity, and hunger. However, the tragedy affects millions of American citizens, where, the unnecessary health conditions associated with child hunger burdens the taxpayer.

It is very embarrassing that America has children who suffer from growth and developmental impairments because of food insecurity and hunger. It is also worth noting that food insecurity and hunger leads to deterred emotional, cognitive, and intellectual development, which affects the educational performance of the affected children.

Food insecurity and hunger is a problem that directly or indirectly affects the entire nation. The pediatricians, in collaboration with the ministry of health should take the role of vaccinating all children against childhood hunger medical conditions. In addition to the vaccinations, the pediatricians should treat the children in an effective and efficient manner whenever they have any health condition associated with hunger and malnutrition.

It is noteworthy that food insecurity and hunger is a community problem, and businesses have to come in and show their Social Corporate Responsibility (CSR). Business leaders have the obligation to help in financing and enabling the success of the interventions to eradicate food insecurity and hunger.

Nutrition assistance programs, food assistance programs, programs to invest in the poor, food aid programs, agricultural programs, and programs to prevent humanitarian crisis would help in eradicating food insecurity and hunger. It is the role of the federal government, the non-federal government, and the businesses to fund the above-mentioned programs to eliminate food insecurity and hunger.

Obviously, the government will undergo extra costs in addressing the issue of food insecurity and hunger because not all business owners will be willing to fund the programs. In addition, the pediatricians and the ministry of public health will have to go an extra mile to reach the hidden patients who suffer from malnutrition. However, this worthwhile exercise would greatly help the children. The approach would solve all the problems associated with the physical, emotional, and intellectual development of the children living in poverty.

The children would perform highly in schools, and thus enhance their future life like the children from elite families. In addition to the associated benefits to the members of the families living in poverty, the exercise would save the taxpayers from the burden of financing the hospitalization of the sickened hungry children.

The employers will benefit from reduced absenteeism because of child sickness and the improved employee turnover at the work place. Finally, the government would benefit from the effective and competitive workforce of the healthy citizens.

• Karl Marx and Max Weber' Views on Sociological Theory
• Sociological Portrait: Elements and Concepts
• The Application of RE-AIM Framework
• Malnutrition in South Africa: Public Health Policy
• Food Insecurity in the US: The New Face of Hunger
• Sociological Perspective: Social Change and Environment
• Exploitation Term Definition
• Income Gaps: Overcoming Disparities
• Individualism in the Current World
• Restaurant Conversation Observation
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, May 11). Social Issues of Families in Poverty. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-issues-of-families-in-poverty/

"Social Issues of Families in Poverty." IvyPanda , 11 May 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/social-issues-of-families-in-poverty/.

IvyPanda . (2020) 'Social Issues of Families in Poverty'. 11 May.

IvyPanda . 2020. "Social Issues of Families in Poverty." May 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-issues-of-families-in-poverty/.

1. IvyPanda . "Social Issues of Families in Poverty." May 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-issues-of-families-in-poverty/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Social Issues of Families in Poverty." May 11, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/social-issues-of-families-in-poverty/.

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Poverty in America — Life in Poverty: Defying the Odds

Life in Poverty: Defying The Odds

• Categories: Child Poverty Poverty in America

About this sample

Words: 438 |

Published: Jan 25, 2024

Words: 438 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Table of contents

Defying the odds, works cited.

• ASHBERY, JOHN. "My Philosophy Of Life". Midwest Studies In Philosophy 33.1 (2009): 1-2. Web.
• Kass, Leon. Life, Liberty, And The Defense Of Dignity. 1st ed. San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2002. Print.

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof. Kifaru

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 1135 words

1 pages / 477 words

1 pages / 650 words

4 pages / 1975 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Poverty in America

Homelessness started to become a dilemma since the 1930s leaving millions of people without homes or jobs during The Great Depression. Homeless people face numerous challenges every day dealing with shelters and food in order to [...]

Homelessness is a pressing issue that affects millions of individuals worldwide. It is a complex problem that arises from a variety of factors, including economic hardship, lack of affordable housing, mental illness, substance [...]

Poverty, a multifaceted phenomenon that affects millions worldwide, is a persistent issue that transcends geographical boundaries and socio-economic statuses. It is not merely the absence of financial resources but also the lack [...]

Poverty in the United States is a pervasive issue that continues to impact millions of individuals and families across the country. Despite being one of the wealthiest nations in the world, a significant portion of the [...]

A small boy tugs at his mother’s coat and exclaims, “Mom! Mom! There’s the fire truck I wanted!” as he gazes through the glass showcase to the toy store. The mother looks down at the toy and sees the price, she pulls her son [...]

In today's society, poverty remains a pervasive and pressing issue that affects millions of individuals worldwide. From lack of access to basic necessities such as food, shelter, and healthcare, to limited opportunities for [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free