critical thinking as a teacher

The Will to Teach

Critical Thinking in the Classroom: A Guide for Teachers

In the ever-evolving landscape of education, teaching students the skill of critical thinking has become a priority. This powerful tool empowers students to evaluate information, make reasoned judgments, and approach problems from a fresh perspective. In this article, we’ll explore the significance of critical thinking and provide effective strategies to nurture this skill in your students.

Why is Fostering Critical Thinking Important?

Strategies to cultivate critical thinking, real-world example, concluding thoughts.

Critical thinking is a key skill that goes far beyond the four walls of a classroom. It equips students to better understand and interact with the world around them. Here are some reasons why fostering critical thinking is important:

• Making Informed Decisions:  Critical thinking enables students to evaluate the pros and cons of a situation, helping them make informed and rational decisions.
• Developing Analytical Skills:  Critical thinking involves analyzing information from different angles, which enhances analytical skills.
• Promoting Independence:  Critical thinking fosters independence by encouraging students to form their own opinions based on their analysis, rather than relying on others.

Creating an environment that encourages critical thinking can be accomplished in various ways. Here are some effective strategies:

• Socratic Questioning:  This method involves asking thought-provoking questions that encourage students to think deeply about a topic. For example, instead of asking, “What is the capital of France?” you might ask, “Why do you think Paris became the capital of France?”
• Debates and Discussions:  Debates and open-ended discussions allow students to explore different viewpoints and challenge their own beliefs. For example, a debate on a current event can engage students in critical analysis of the situation.
• Teaching Metacognition:  Teaching students to think about their own thinking can enhance their critical thinking skills. This can be achieved through activities such as reflective writing or journaling.
• Problem-Solving Activities:  As with developing problem-solving skills , activities that require students to find solutions to complex problems can also foster critical thinking.

As a school leader, I’ve seen the transformative power of critical thinking. During a school competition, I observed a team of students tasked with proposing a solution to reduce our school’s environmental impact. Instead of jumping to obvious solutions, they critically evaluated multiple options, considering the feasibility, cost, and potential impact of each. They ultimately proposed a comprehensive plan that involved water conservation, waste reduction, and energy efficiency measures. This demonstrated their ability to critically analyze a problem and develop an effective solution.

Critical thinking is an essential skill for students in the 21st century. It equips them to understand and navigate the world in a thoughtful and informed manner. As a teacher, incorporating strategies to foster critical thinking in your classroom can make a lasting impact on your students’ educational journey and life beyond school.

1. What is critical thinking? Critical thinking is the ability to analyze information objectively and make a reasoned judgment.

2. Why is critical thinking important for students? Critical thinking helps students make informed decisions, develop analytical skills, and promotes independence.

3. What are some strategies to cultivate critical thinking in students? Strategies can include Socratic questioning, debates and discussions, teaching metacognition, and problem-solving activities.

4. How can I assess my students’ critical thinking skills? You can assess critical thinking skills through essays, presentations, discussions, and problem-solving tasks that require thoughtful analysis.

5. Can critical thinking be taught? Yes, critical thinking can be taught and nurtured through specific teaching strategies and a supportive learning environment.

Related Posts

7 simple strategies for strong student-teacher relationships.

Getting to know your students on a personal level is the first step towards building strong relationships. Show genuine interest in their lives outside the classroom.

Connecting Learning to Real-World Contexts: Strategies for Teachers

When students see the relevance of their classroom lessons to their everyday lives, they are more likely to be motivated, engaged, and retain information.

Encouraging Active Involvement in Learning: Strategies for Teachers

Active learning benefits students by improving retention of information, enhancing critical thinking skills, and encouraging a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Collaborative and Cooperative Learning: A Guide for Teachers

These methods encourage students to work together, share ideas, and actively participate in their education.

Experiential Teaching: Role-Play and Simulations in Teaching

These interactive techniques allow students to immerse themselves in practical, real-world scenarios, thereby deepening their understanding and retention of key concepts.

Project-Based Learning Activities: A Guide for Teachers

Project-Based Learning is a student-centered pedagogy that involves a dynamic approach to teaching, where students explore real-world problems or challenges.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Classroom Q&A

With larry ferlazzo.

In this EdWeek blog, an experiment in knowledge-gathering, Ferlazzo will address readers’ questions on classroom management, ELL instruction, lesson planning, and other issues facing teachers. Send your questions to [email protected]. Read more from this blog.

Integrating Critical Thinking Into the Classroom

• Share article

(This is the second post in a three-part series. You can see Part One here .)

The new question-of-the-week is:

What is critical thinking and how can we integrate it into the classroom?

Part One ‘s guests were Dara Laws Savage, Patrick Brown, Meg Riordan, Ph.D., and Dr. PJ Caposey. Dara, Patrick, and Meg were also guests on my 10-minute BAM! Radio Show . You can also find a list of, and links to, previous shows here.

Today, Dr. Kulvarn Atwal, Elena Quagliarello, Dr. Donna Wilson, and Diane Dahl share their recommendations.

‘Learning Conversations’

Dr. Kulvarn Atwal is currently the executive head teacher of two large primary schools in the London borough of Redbridge. Dr. Atwal is the author of The Thinking School: Developing a Dynamic Learning Community , published by John Catt Educational. Follow him on Twitter @Thinkingschool2 :

In many classrooms I visit, students’ primary focus is on what they are expected to do and how it will be measured. It seems that we are becoming successful at producing students who are able to jump through hoops and pass tests. But are we producing children that are positive about teaching and learning and can think critically and creatively? Consider your classroom environment and the extent to which you employ strategies that develop students’ critical-thinking skills and their self-esteem as learners.

Development of self-esteem

One of the most significant factors that impacts students’ engagement and achievement in learning in your classroom is their self-esteem. In this context, self-esteem can be viewed to be the difference between how they perceive themselves as a learner (perceived self) and what they consider to be the ideal learner (ideal self). This ideal self may reflect the child that is associated or seen to be the smartest in the class. Your aim must be to raise students’ self-esteem. To do this, you have to demonstrate that effort, not ability, leads to success. Your language and interactions in the classroom, therefore, have to be aspirational—that if children persist with something, they will achieve.

Use of evaluative praise

Ensure that when you are praising students, you are making explicit links to a child’s critical thinking and/or development. This will enable them to build their understanding of what factors are supporting them in their learning. For example, often when we give feedback to students, we may simply say, “Well done” or “Good answer.” However, are the students actually aware of what they did well or what was good about their answer? Make sure you make explicit what the student has done well and where that links to prior learning. How do you value students’ critical thinking—do you praise their thinking and demonstrate how it helps them improve their learning?

Learning conversations to encourage deeper thinking

We often feel as teachers that we have to provide feedback to every students’ response, but this can limit children’s thinking. Encourage students in your class to engage in learning conversations with each other. Give as many opportunities as possible to students to build on the responses of others. Facilitate chains of dialogue by inviting students to give feedback to each other. The teacher’s role is, therefore, to facilitate this dialogue and select each individual student to give feedback to others. It may also mean that you do not always need to respond at all to a student’s answer.

Teacher modelling own thinking

We cannot expect students to develop critical-thinking skills if we aren’t modeling those thinking skills for them. Share your creativity, imagination, and thinking skills with the students and you will nurture creative, imaginative critical thinkers. Model the language you want students to learn and think about. Share what you feel about the learning activities your students are participating in as well as the thinking you are engaging in. Your own thinking and learning will add to the discussions in the classroom and encourage students to share their own thinking.

Metacognitive questioning

Consider the extent to which your questioning encourages students to think about their thinking, and therefore, learn about learning! Through asking metacognitive questions, you will enable your students to have a better understanding of the learning process, as well as their own self-reflections as learners. Example questions may include:

• Why did you choose to do it that way?
• When you find something tricky, what helps you?
• How do you know when you have really learned something?

‘Adventures of Discovery’

Elena Quagliarello is the senior editor of education for Scholastic News , a current events magazine for students in grades 3–6. She graduated from Rutgers University, where she studied English and earned her master’s degree in elementary education. She is a certified K–12 teacher and previously taught middle school English/language arts for five years:

Critical thinking blasts through the surface level of a topic. It reaches beyond the who and the what and launches students on a learning journey that ultimately unlocks a deeper level of understanding. Teaching students how to think critically helps them turn information into knowledge and knowledge into wisdom. In the classroom, critical thinking teaches students how to ask and answer the questions needed to read the world. Whether it’s a story, news article, photo, video, advertisement, or another form of media, students can use the following critical-thinking strategies to dig beyond the surface and uncover a wealth of knowledge.

A Layered Learning Approach

Begin by having students read a story, article, or analyze a piece of media. Then have them excavate and explore its various layers of meaning. First, ask students to think about the literal meaning of what they just read. For example, if students read an article about the desegregation of public schools during the 1950s, they should be able to answer questions such as: Who was involved? What happened? Where did it happen? Which details are important? This is the first layer of critical thinking: reading comprehension. Do students understand the passage at its most basic level?

Ask the Tough Questions

The next layer delves deeper and starts to uncover the author’s purpose and craft. Teach students to ask the tough questions: What information is included? What or who is left out? How does word choice influence the reader? What perspective is represented? What values or people are marginalized? These questions force students to critically analyze the choices behind the final product. In today’s age of fast-paced, easily accessible information, it is essential to teach students how to critically examine the information they consume. The goal is to equip students with the mindset to ask these questions on their own.

Strike Gold

The deepest layer of critical thinking comes from having students take a step back to think about the big picture. This level of thinking is no longer focused on the text itself but rather its real-world implications. Students explore questions such as: Why does this matter? What lesson have I learned? How can this lesson be applied to other situations? Students truly engage in critical thinking when they are able to reflect on their thinking and apply their knowledge to a new situation. This step has the power to transform knowledge into wisdom.

Adventures of Discovery

There are vast ways to spark critical thinking in the classroom. Here are a few other ideas:

• Critical Expressionism: In this expanded response to reading from a critical stance, students are encouraged to respond through forms of artistic interpretations, dramatizations, singing, sketching, designing projects, or other multimodal responses. For example, students might read an article and then create a podcast about it or read a story and then act it out.
• Transmediations: This activity requires students to take an article or story and transform it into something new. For example, they might turn a news article into a cartoon or turn a story into a poem. Alternatively, students may rewrite a story by changing some of its elements, such as the setting or time period.
• Words Into Action: In this type of activity, students are encouraged to take action and bring about change. Students might read an article about endangered orangutans and the effects of habitat loss caused by deforestation and be inspired to check the labels on products for palm oil. They might then write a letter asking companies how they make sure the palm oil they use doesn’t hurt rain forests.
• Socratic Seminars: In this student-led discussion strategy, students pose thought-provoking questions to each other about a topic. They listen closely to each other’s comments and think critically about different perspectives.
• Classroom Debates: Aside from sparking a lively conversation, classroom debates naturally embed critical-thinking skills by asking students to formulate and support their own opinions and consider and respond to opposing viewpoints.

Critical thinking has the power to launch students on unforgettable learning experiences while helping them develop new habits of thought, reflection, and inquiry. Developing these skills prepares students to examine issues of power and promote transformative change in the world around them.

‘Quote Analysis’

Dr. Donna Wilson is a psychologist and the author of 20 books, including Developing Growth Mindsets , Teaching Students to Drive Their Brains , and Five Big Ideas for Effective Teaching (2 nd Edition). She is an international speaker who has worked in Asia, the Middle East, Australia, Europe, Jamaica, and throughout the U.S. and Canada. Dr. Wilson can be reached at [email protected] ; visit her website at www.brainsmart.org .

Diane Dahl has been a teacher for 13 years, having taught grades 2-4 throughout her career. Mrs. Dahl currently teaches 3rd and 4th grade GT-ELAR/SS in Lovejoy ISD in Fairview, Texas. Follow her on Twitter at @DahlD, and visit her website at www.fortheloveofteaching.net :

A growing body of research over the past several decades indicates that teaching students how to be better thinkers is a great way to support them to be more successful at school and beyond. In the book, Teaching Students to Drive Their Brains , Dr. Wilson shares research and many motivational strategies, activities, and lesson ideas that assist students to think at higher levels. Five key strategies from the book are as follows:

• Facilitate conversation about why it is important to think critically at school and in other contexts of life. Ideally, every student will have a contribution to make to the discussion over time.
• Begin teaching thinking skills early in the school year and as a daily part of class.
• As this instruction begins, introduce students to the concept of brain plasticity and how their brilliant brains change during thinking and learning. This can be highly motivational for students who do not yet believe they are good thinkers!
• Explicitly teach students how to use the thinking skills.
• Facilitate student understanding of how the thinking skills they are learning relate to their lives at school and in other contexts.

Below are two lessons that support critical thinking, which can be defined as the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment.

Mrs. Dahl prepares her 3rd and 4th grade classes for a year of critical thinking using quote analysis .

During Native American studies, her 4 th grade analyzes a Tuscarora quote: “Man has responsibility, not power.” Since students already know how the Native Americans’ land had been stolen, it doesn’t take much for them to make the logical leaps. Critical-thought prompts take their thinking even deeper, especially at the beginning of the year when many need scaffolding. Some prompts include:

• … from the point of view of the Native Americans?
• … from the point of view of the settlers?
• How do you think your life might change over time as a result?
• Can you relate this quote to anything else in history?

Analyzing a topic from occupational points of view is an incredibly powerful critical-thinking tool. After learning about the Mexican-American War, Mrs. Dahl’s students worked in groups to choose an occupation with which to analyze the war. The chosen occupations were: anthropologist, mathematician, historian, archaeologist, cartographer, and economist. Then each individual within each group chose a different critical-thinking skill to focus on. Finally, they worked together to decide how their occupation would view the war using each skill.

For example, here is what each student in the economist group wrote:

• When U.S.A. invaded Mexico for land and won, Mexico ended up losing income from the settlements of Jose de Escandon. The U.S.A. thought that they were gaining possible tradable land, while Mexico thought that they were losing precious land and resources.
• Whenever Texas joined the states, their GDP skyrocketed. Then they went to war and spent money on supplies. When the war was resolving, Texas sold some of their land to New Mexico for $10 million. This allowed Texas to pay off their debt to the U.S., improving their relationship.
• A detail that converged into the Mexican-American War was that Mexico and the U.S. disagreed on the Texas border. With the resulting treaty, Texas ended up gaining more land and economic resources.
• Texas gained land from Mexico since both countries disagreed on borders. Texas sold land to New Mexico, which made Texas more economically structured and allowed them to pay off their debt.

This was the first time that students had ever used the occupations technique. Mrs. Dahl was astonished at how many times the kids used these critical skills in other areas moving forward.

Thanks to Dr. Auwal, Elena, Dr. Wilson, and Diane for their contributions!

Please feel free to leave a comment with your reactions to the topic or directly to anything that has been said in this post.

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at [email protected] . When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it’s selected or if you’d prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

You can also contact me on Twitter at @Larryferlazzo .

Education Week has published a collection of posts from this blog, along with new material, in an e-book form. It’s titled Classroom Management Q&As: Expert Strategies for Teaching .

Just a reminder; you can subscribe and receive updates from this blog via email (The RSS feed for this blog, and for all Ed Week articles, has been changed by the new redesign—new ones won’t be available until February). And if you missed any of the highlights from the first nine years of this blog, you can see a categorized list below.

• This Year’s Most Popular Q&A Posts
• Race & Racism in Schools
• School Closures & the Coronavirus Crisis
• Classroom-Management Advice
• Best Ways to Begin the School Year
• Best Ways to End the School Year
• Student Motivation & Social-Emotional Learning
• Implementing the Common Core
• Facing Gender Challenges in Education
• Teaching Social Studies
• Cooperative & Collaborative Learning
• Using Tech in the Classroom
• Student Voices
• Parent Engagement in Schools
• Teaching English-Language Learners
• Reading Instruction
• Writing Instruction
• Education Policy Issues
• Differentiating Instruction
• Math Instruction
• Science Instruction
• Advice for New Teachers
• Author Interviews
• Entering the Teaching Profession
• The Inclusive Classroom
• Learning & the Brain
• Administrator Leadership
• Teacher Leadership
• Relationships in Schools
• Professional Development
• Instructional Strategies
• Best of Classroom Q&A
• Professional Collaboration
• Classroom Organization
• Mistakes in Education
• Project-Based Learning

I am also creating a Twitter list including all contributors to this column .

The opinions expressed in Classroom Q&A With Larry Ferlazzo are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Sign Up for EdWeek Update

Edweek top school jobs.

Sign Up & Sign In

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Critical thinking in teacher education: course design and teaching practicum, 1. the importance of critical thinking in teacher education, instructional approaches to critical thinking, 2. the courses: theoretical lectures and teaching practicum, 2.1. design of the courses.

• What factors should I take into consideration during my lesson plan?
• Which information should I obtain for my class and pupils before I design my lesson plan?
• How can I manage critical incidents in class?
• Did the instruction follow my lesson plan or did it deviate from that?

2.2. Teaching Strategies Employed in the Courses

2.3. disciplinary competencies, 2.4. critical thinking skills and dispositions, 2.5. other components related to critical thinking, 3. discussion and conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Lyu, M.; Li, W.; Xie, Y. The influences of family background and structural factors on children’s academic performances: A cross-country comparative study. Chin. J. Sociol. 2019 , 5 , 173–192. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Darling-Hammond, L.; Wise, A.E.; Klein, S.P. A License to Teach. Building a Profession for 21st-Century Schools ; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mohamed, Z.; Valcke, M.; De Wever, B. Are they ready to teach? Student teachers’ readiness for the job with reference to teacher competence frameworks. J. Educ. Teach. 2017 , 43 , 151–170. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, S.; Raza, M.; Seidman, E. Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Res. Comp. Int. Educ. 2019 , 14 , 99–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leaton Gray, S.; Scott, D.; Mehisto, P. Curriculum Reform in the European Schools: Towards a 21st Century Vision ; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bernhardt, P.E. 21st century learning: Professional development in practice. Qual. Rep. 2015 , 20 , 1–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jan, H. Teacher of 21st century: Characteristics and development. Res. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2017 , 7 , 50–54. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lorencová, H.; Jarošová, E.; Avgitidou, S.; Dimitriadou, C. Critical thinking practices in teacher education programmes: A systematic review. Stud. High. Educ. 2019 , 44 , 844–859. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Botha, M.L.; Reddy, C.P.S. In-service teachers’ perspectives of pre-service teachers’ knowledge domains in science. S. Afr. J. Educ. 2011 , 31 , 257–274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dumitru, D.; Christodoulou, P.; Lithoxoidou, A.; Georgiadou, T.; Pnevmatikos, D.; Drămnescu, A.M.; Enachescu, V.; Stăiculescu, C.; Lăcătuş, M.L.; Paduraru, M.E.; et al. Think4Jobs Toolkit: Ten Work-Based Learning Scenarios ; University of Western Macedonia: Florina, Greece, 2021; ISBN 978-618-5613-01-3. Available online: https://think4jobs.uowm.gr/results/intellectualoutput1 (accessed on 15 May 2023).
• Bezanilla, M.J.; Galindo-Domínguez, H.; Campo, L.; Fernández-Nogueira, D.; Ruiz, M.P. Understanding critical thinking: A comparative analysis between university students’ and teachers’ conception. Tuning J. High. Educ. 2023 , 10 , 223–244. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Davies, M. Introduction to the special issue on critical thinking in higher education. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2011 , 30 , 255–260. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ennis, R.H. Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi 2018 , 37 , 165–184. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tiruneh, D.T.; De Cock, M.; Elen, J. Designing Learning Environments for Critical Thinking: Examining Effective Instructional Approaches. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2018 , 16 , 1065–1089. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bezanilla, M.J.; Galindo-Domínguez, H.; Poblete, M. Importance of Teaching Critical Thinking in Higher Education and Existing Difficulties According to Teacher’s Views. Multidiscip. J. Educ. Res. 2021 , 11 , 20–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Levin, M.; Peterson, L.T. A Sales Representative Is Made: An Innovative Sales Course. Mark. Educ. Rev. 2016 , 26 , 39–44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Caena, F.; Redecker, C. Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). Eur. J. Educ. 2019 , 54 , 356–369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van Gelder, T. Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. Coll. Teach. 2005 , 53 , 41–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abrami, P.C.; Bernard, R.M.; Borokhovski, E.; Waddington, D.I.; Wade, C.A.; Persson, T. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 2015 , 85 , 275–314. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ennis, R.H. Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educ. Res. 1989 , 18 , 4–10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tiruneh, D.T.; Verburgh, A.; Elen, J. Effectiveness of critical thinking instruction in higher education: A systematic review of intervention studies. High. Educ. Stud. 2014 , 4 , 1–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heijltjes, A.; Van Gog, T.; Paas, F. Improving students’ critical thinking: Empirical support for explicit instructions combined with practice. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2014 , 28 , 518–530. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abrami, P.C.; Bernard, R.M.; Borokhovski, E.; Wade, A.; Surkes, M.A.; Tamim, R.; Zhang, D. Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 2008 , 78 , 1102–1134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bensley, D.A.; Spero, R.A. Improving critical thinking skills and metacognitive monitoring through direct infusion. Think. Ski. Creat. 2014 , 12 , 55–68. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brookfield, S. The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. Eur. J. Soc. Work 2009 , 12 , 293–304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Papanthymou, A.; Darra, M. Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: The International Experience and The Greek Example. World J. Educ. 2018 , 8 , 130–146. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Murphy, C.; Smith, G. The impact of a curriculum course on pre-service primary teachers’ science content knowledge and attitudes towards teaching science. Ir. Educ. Stud. 2012 , 31 , 77–95. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bensley, D.A.; Crowe, D.S.; Bernhardt, P.; Buckner, C.; Allman, A.L. Teaching and assessing critical thinking skills for argument analysis in psychology. Teach. Psychol. 2010 , 37 , 91–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Halpern, D.F.; Dunn, D.S. Thought and Knowledge. An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 6th ed.; Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• White, S.; Forgasz, R. The practicum: The place of experience? In International Handbook of Teacher Education ; Loughran, J., Hamilton, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 231–266. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Seibert, S.A. Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z’s critical thinking and perseverance. Teach. Learn. Nurs. 2021 , 16 , 85–88. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Paul, R.; Elder, L. Critical thinking: The art of Socratic questioning, part III. J. Dev. Educ. 2008 , 31 , 34–35. [ Google Scholar ]
• Love, A.G. The growth and current state of learning communities in higher education. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2012 , 2012 , 5–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Devi, A.P.; Musthafa, B.; Gustine, G.G.G. Using cooperative learning in teaching critical thinking in reading. Engl. Rev. J. Engl. Educ. 2015 , 4 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Reed, S.K. The structure of ill-structured (and well-structured) problems revisited. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2016 , 28 , 691–716. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dolapcioglu, S.; Doğanay, A. Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: An action research. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 2022 , 53 , 1363–1386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Beavers, E.; Orange, A.; Kirkwood, D. Fostering critical and reflective thinking in an authentic learning situation. J. Early Child. Teach. Educ. 2017 , 38 , 3–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Girvan, C.; Conneely, C.; Tangney, B. Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2016 , 58 , 129–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hamilton, J.G.; Klebba, J.M. Experiential learning: A course design process for critical thinking. Am. J. Bus Educ. 2011 , 4 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wright, G.B. Student-centered learning in higher education. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 2011 , 23 , 92–97. [ Google Scholar ]
• Halawa, S.; Hsu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Kuo, Y.; Wu, J. Features and trends of teaching strategies for scientific practices from a review of 2008–2017 articles. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2020 , 42 , 1183–1206. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bakır, S. The effect of microteaching on the teaching skills of pre-service science teachers. J. Balt. Sci. Educ. 2014 , 13 , 789–801. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ertmer, P.A.; Newby, T.J. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform. Improv. Q. 1993 , 6 , 50–72. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hackmann, D.G. Constructivism and Block Scheduling: Making the Connection. Phi Delta Kappan 2004 , 85 , 697–702. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kong, N.W.; Lai, K.S. ICT and constructivist strategies instruction for science and mathematics education. J. Sci. Math. Educ. Southeast Asia 2005 , 28 , 138–160. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dohn, N.B.; Markauskaite, L.; Hachmann, R. Enhancing knowledge transfer. In Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology , 5th ed.; Bishop, M.J., Boling, E., Elen, J., Svihla, V., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 73–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wilson, B.G. The postmodern paradigm. In Instructional Development Paradigms ; Dills, C., Romoszowski, A., Eds.; Educational Technology Publications: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1997; pp. 297–309. [ Google Scholar ]
• Qarareh, A.O. The Effect of Using the Constructivist Learning Model in Teaching Science on the Achievement and Scientific Thinking of 8th Grade Students. Int. Educ. Stud. 2016 , 9 , 178–196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Von Glasersfeld, E. Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 1989 , 80 , 121–140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bada, S.O.; Olusegun, S. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. J. Res. Method Educ. 2015 , 5 , 66–70. [ Google Scholar ]
• Karagiorgi, Y.; Symeou, L. Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. J. Educ. Tech. Soc. 2005 , 8 , 17–27. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yadav, R. Role of constructivism in learning. Int. J. Educ. Stu. 2016 , 3 , 93–96. [ Google Scholar ]
• Andrini, V.S. The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Method to Enhance Students’ Learning Outcome: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. J. Educ. Pract. 2016 , 7 , 38–42. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bevins, S.; Price, G. Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2016 , 38 , 17–29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McBride, J.W.; Bhatti, M.I.; Hannan, M.A.; Feinberg, M. Using an inquiry approach to teach science to secondary school science teachers. Phys. Educ. 2004 , 39 , 434. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Uhrmacher, P.B.; Conrad, B.M.; Moroye, C.M. Finding the balance between process and product through perceptual lesson planning. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2013 , 115 , 1–27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Maryani, I.; Martaningsih, S.T.; Bhakti, C.P. Module based on pedagogical content knowledge to increase the engagement and skills of the future teachers in designing a lesson plan. J. Educ. Learn. 2017 , 11 , 91–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Korpershoek, H.; Harms, T.; de Boer, H.; van Kuijk, M.; Doolaard, S. A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Rev. Educ. Res. 2016 , 86 , 643–680. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Evertson, C.M.; Weinstein, C.S. (Eds.) Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues ; Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marzano, R.J.; Marzano, J.S. The key to classroom management. Educ. Leadersh. 2003 , 61 , 6–13. [ Google Scholar ]
• Santangelo, T.; Tomlinson, C.A. Teacher educators’ perceptions and use of differentiated instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action Teach. Educ. 2012 , 34 , 309–327. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khan, H.M.A.; Farooqi, M.T.K.; Khalil, A.; Faisal, I. Exploring Relationship of Time Management with Teachers’ Performance. Bull. Educ. Res. 2016 , 38 , 249–263. [ Google Scholar ]
• Watts, G.D.; Castle, S. The time dilemma in school restructuring. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, USA, 20–24 April 1992. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pnevmatikos, D.; Christodoulou, P.; Georgiadou, T.; Lithoxoidou, A.; Dimitriadou, C.; Payan Carreira, R.; Simões, M.; Ferreira, D.; Rebelo, H.; Sebastião, L.; et al. THINK4JOBS TRAINING: Critical Thinking Training Packages for Higher Education Instructors and Labour Market Tutors ; University of Western Macedonia: Florina, Greece, 2021; ISBN 978-618-5613-02-0. Available online: https://think4jobs.uowm.gr/results/intellectualoutput2 (accessed on 15 May 2023).
• Facione, P.A. Critical Thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. In Research Findings and Recommendations ; American Philosophical Association: Newark, DE, USA, 1990. [ Google Scholar ]
• Facione, N.C.; Facione, P.A.; Sánchez (Giancarlo), C.A. Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical thinking Disposition Inventory. J. Nurs. Educ. 1994 , 33 , 345–350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zahorik, J.A. Stability and flexibility in teaching. Teach. Teach. Educ. 1990 , 6 , 69–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rosenblatt, Z. Skill flexibility and school change: A multi-national study. J. Educ. Chang. 2004 , 5 , 1–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dewey, J. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relations of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process ; D.C. Heath & Co Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 1933. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schon, D.A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Profession ; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1987. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yan, Z.; Brown, G.T. A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2017 , 42 , 1247–1262. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pnevmatikos, D.; Christodoulou, P.; Georgiadou, T.; Lithoxoidou, A. Undergraduate Students’ Conceptualization of Critical Thinking and Their Ideas for Critical Thinking Acquisition. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 416. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Farrell, T.S. Reflecting on Reflective Practice:(Re) Visiting Dewey and Schon. Tesol J. 2012 , 3 , 7–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nolen, A.L.; Putten, J.V. Action research in education: Addressing gaps in ethical principles and practices. Educ. Res. 2007 , 36 , 401–407. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Smith, E. Teaching critical reflection. Teach. High. Educ. 2011 , 16 , 211–223. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baehr, J. Educating for Intellectual Virtues: From Theory to Practice. J. Philos. Educ. 2013 , 47 , 248–262. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paul, R. Critical thinking, moral integrity, and citizenship: Teaching for the intellectual virtues. In The Social Worlds of Higher Education. Handbook for Teaching in a New Century ; Pescosolido, B., Aminzade, R., Eds.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rivas, S.F.; Saiz, C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the ARDESOS-DIAPROVE critical thinking training programme. Think. Ski. Creat. 2023 , 48 , 101306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Payan Carreira, R.; Rebelo, H.; Sebastião, L.; Sacau, A.; Ferreira, D.; Simões, M.; Pnevmatikos, D.; Christodoulou, P.; Lithoxoidou, A.; Georgiadou, T.; et al. THINK4JOBS Guidelines: A Protocol for Critical Thinking Transfer from Curricula to Labour Market ; University of Western Macedonia: Florina, Greece, 2023; ISBN 978-618-5613-11-2. Available online: https://think4jobs.uowm.gr/results/intellectualoutput4 (accessed on 15 May 2023).
• Elder, L. Critical thinking as the key to the learning college: A professional development model. New Dir. Community Coll. 2005 , 130 , 39–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Share and Cite

Lithoxoidou, A.; Georgiadou, T. Critical Thinking in Teacher Education: Course Design and Teaching Practicum. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080837

Lithoxoidou A, Georgiadou T. Critical Thinking in Teacher Education: Course Design and Teaching Practicum. Education Sciences . 2023; 13(8):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080837

Lithoxoidou, Angeliki, and Triantafyllia Georgiadou. 2023. "Critical Thinking in Teacher Education: Course Design and Teaching Practicum" Education Sciences 13, no. 8: 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080837

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

• Grades 6-12
• School Leaders

Have you entered to win this adorable math giveaway? ✨

What Is Critical Thinking and Why Do We Need To Teach It?

Question the world and sort out fact from opinion.

The world is full of information (and misinformation) from books, TV, magazines, newspapers, online articles, social media, and more. Everyone has their own opinions, and these opinions are frequently presented as facts. Making informed choices is more important than ever, and that takes strong critical thinking skills. But what exactly is critical thinking? Why should we teach it to our students? Read on to find out.

What is critical thinking?

Source: Indeed

Critical thinking is the ability to examine a subject and develop an informed opinion about it. It’s about asking questions, then looking closely at the answers to form conclusions that are backed by provable facts, not just “gut feelings” and opinion. These skills allow us to confidently navigate a world full of persuasive advertisements, opinions presented as facts, and confusing and contradictory information.

The Foundation for Critical Thinking says, “Critical thinking can be seen as having two components: 1) a set of information and belief-generating and processing skills, and 2) the habit, based on intellectual commitment, of using those skills to guide behavior.”

In other words, good critical thinkers know how to analyze and evaluate information, breaking it down to separate fact from opinion. After a thorough analysis, they feel confident forming their own opinions on a subject. And what’s more, critical thinkers use these skills regularly in their daily lives. Rather than jumping to conclusions or being guided by initial reactions, they’ve formed the habit of applying their critical thinking skills to all new information and topics.

Why is critical thinking so important?

Imagine you’re shopping for a new car. It’s a big purchase, so you want to do your research thoroughly. There’s a lot of information out there, and it’s up to you to sort through it all.

• You’ve seen TV commercials for a couple of car models that look really cool and have features you like, such as good gas mileage. Plus, your favorite celebrity drives that car!
• The manufacturer’s website has a lot of information, like cost, MPG, and other details. It also mentions that this car has been ranked “best in its class.”
• Your neighbor down the street used to have this kind of car, but he tells you that he eventually got rid of it because he didn’t think it was comfortable to drive. Plus, he heard that brand of car isn’t as good as it used to be.
• Three independent organizations have done test-drives and published their findings online. They all agree that the car has good gas mileage and a sleek design. But they each have their own concerns or complaints about the car, including one that found it might not be safe in high winds.

So much information! It’s tempting to just go with your gut and buy the car that looks the coolest (or is the cheapest, or says it has the best gas mileage). Ultimately, though, you know you need to slow down and take your time, or you could wind up making a mistake that costs you thousands of dollars. You need to think critically to make an informed choice.

What does critical thinking look like?

Source: TeachThought

Let’s continue with the car analogy, and apply some critical thinking to the situation.

• Critical thinkers know they can’t trust TV commercials to help them make smart choices, since every single one wants you to think their car is the best option.
• The manufacturer’s website will have some details that are proven facts, but other statements that are hard to prove or clearly just opinions. Which information is factual, and even more important, relevant to your choice?
• A neighbor’s stories are anecdotal, so they may or may not be useful. They’re the opinions and experiences of just one person and might not be representative of a whole. Can you find other people with similar experiences that point to a pattern?
• The independent studies could be trustworthy, although it depends on who conducted them and why. Closer analysis might show that the most positive study was conducted by a company hired by the car manufacturer itself. Who conducted each study, and why?

Did you notice all the questions that started to pop up? That’s what critical thinking is about: asking the right questions, and knowing how to find and evaluate the answers to those questions.

Good critical thinkers do this sort of analysis every day, on all sorts of subjects. They seek out proven facts and trusted sources, weigh the options, and then make a choice and form their own opinions. It’s a process that becomes automatic over time; experienced critical thinkers question everything thoughtfully, with purpose. This helps them feel confident that their informed opinions and choices are the right ones for them.

Key Critical Thinking Skills

There’s no official list, but many people use Bloom’s Taxonomy to help lay out the skills kids should develop as they grow up.

Source: Vanderbilt University

Bloom’s Taxonomy is laid out as a pyramid, with foundational skills at the bottom providing a base for more advanced skills higher up. The lowest phase, “Remember,” doesn’t require much critical thinking. These are skills like memorizing math facts, defining vocabulary words, or knowing the main characters and basic plot points of a story.

Higher skills on Bloom’s list incorporate more critical thinking.

True understanding is more than memorization or reciting facts. It’s the difference between a child reciting by rote “one times four is four, two times four is eight, three times four is twelve,” versus recognizing that multiplication is the same as adding a number to itself a certain number of times. When you understand a concept, you can explain how it works to someone else.

When you apply your knowledge, you take a concept you’ve already mastered and apply it to new situations. For instance, a student learning to read doesn’t need to memorize every word. Instead, they use their skills in sounding out letters to tackle each new word as they come across it.

When we analyze something, we don’t take it at face value. Analysis requires us to find facts that stand up to inquiry. We put aside personal feelings or beliefs, and instead identify and scrutinize primary sources for information. This is a complex skill, one we hone throughout our entire lives.

Evaluating means reflecting on analyzed information, selecting the most relevant and reliable facts to help us make choices or form opinions. True evaluation requires us to put aside our own biases and accept that there may be other valid points of view, even if we don’t necessarily agree with them.

Finally, critical thinkers are ready to create their own result. They can make a choice, form an opinion, cast a vote, write a thesis, debate a topic, and more. And they can do it with the confidence that comes from approaching the topic critically.

How do you teach critical thinking skills?

The best way to create a future generation of critical thinkers is to encourage them to ask lots of questions. Then, show them how to find the answers by choosing reliable primary sources. Require them to justify their opinions with provable facts, and help them identify bias in themselves and others. Try some of these resources to get started.

5 Critical Thinking Skills Every Kid Needs To Learn (And How To Teach Them)

• 100+ Critical Thinking Questions for Students To Ask About Anything
• 10 Tips for Teaching Kids To Be Awesome Critical Thinkers
• Free Critical Thinking Poster, Rubric, and Assessment Ideas

More Critical Thinking Resources

The answer to “What is critical thinking?” is a complex one. These resources can help you dig more deeply into the concept and hone your own skills.

• The Foundation for Critical Thinking
• Cultivating a Critical Thinking Mindset (PDF)
• Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Browne/Keeley, 2014)

Have more questions about what critical thinking is or how to teach it in your classroom? Join the WeAreTeachers HELPLINE group on Facebook to ask for advice and share ideas!

Plus, 12 skills students can work on now to help them in careers later ..

You Might Also Like

Teach them to thoughtfully question the world around them. Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. 5335 Gate Parkway, Jacksonville, FL 32256

1. Teaching Critical Thinking: How to Inspire Better Reasoning

Teaching critical thinking, as most teachers know, is a challenge. Classroom time is always at a premium and teaching thinking and reasoning can fall by the wayside, especially when testing goals and state requirements take precedence. But for a growing number of educators, critical thinking has become a priority. 

This is because, for many reasons, young people simply need critical thinking instruction: 

• They are faced with myriad crises — many real and some imagined or exaggerated by unreliable news sources and overstimulated social media users. 
• They spend more and more of their time in internet-connected environments where advertisers and interest groups hold previously unimaginable powers of manipulation over them. 
• Technology, politics, and society in general all seem to be changing faster than ever before, and the future seems more uncertain than ever.

These changes don’t only complicate the world itself; they affect our powers of understanding at the same time. There’s evidence suggesting social media use can damage attention spans , have an outsized impact on emotions and mental health, and even affect memory . Psychologically addictive reward systems are built into many of these platforms. 

Even generally reliable news sources, which increasingly orient themselves to their own fragmented segment of the journalism market, can overwhelm our powers of judgment with sensationalistic headlines, misleading framing, and the sheer volume of information at our fingertips.

The kind of thinking and attention required to engage with complicated issues becomes harder to foster and harder to maintain than it might be in a less saturated information ecosystem. Under these conditions, critical thinking, which has long been a buzzword in education, takes on a new and more urgent significance. New opportunities and methods for teaching critical thinking are needed.

Critical thinking, which has long been a buzzword in education, takes on a new and more urgent significance.

Being able to think critically — with rigor, depth, patience, emotional intelligence, and humility — can have wide-ranging impacts on every aspect of students’ lives: their contributions to civic life, their professional success, their ability to build and maintain healthy relationships, their mental health, and even their physical well-being. 

What are the key strategies for teaching critical thinking skills? In many ways, we are still at square one when it comes to teaching our students how to think critically. There are a number of obstacles here:

• Teachers are not given the time, freedom, materials, or professional development tools to teach their students how to think critically.
• Mainstream education priorities — too focused on test results and narrowly defined skills — don’t leave room for critical thinking.
• The best education research, which strongly suggests that critical thinking instruction must be embedded in specific domain instruction, is not well-known or widely put into practice.
• Traditional curricula have not evolved quickly enough to adapt to the new challenges students face in analyzing information and media. 

What Is Critical Thinking?

For all the talk about critical thinking, there remains a lot of confusion about what exactly it is. So what does critical thinking mean? This is key to teaching critical thinking, of course. 

The Reboot Foundation defines critical thinking quite simply as high-level skills in reasoning, coming to judgments, and making decisions. Even more simply: critical thinking is thinking well. 

To get a little more specific, critical thinkers are regularly reflective, objective, and analytical in their thinking:

• They step back to reflect on their own thinking, taking time to plan, strategize, and reform their thinking when necessary. 
• They do their best to overcome subjective biases. While they know that pure objectivity is an ideal we can never reach, they draw on the perspectives of others, especially those with opposing views, in order to expand their own horizons.
• They use the analytical tools of logic and effective argumentation to evaluate evidence, make judgments, and discuss issues with others. 

For more about Reboot’s definition of critical thinking please see this post: “What Is Critical Thinking?”

How to Teach Critical Thinking

As part of the Reboot Foundation’s efforts to create this guide on how to teach critical thinking we consulted with a group of leading teachers from around the country, teaching in different types of schools, at different grade levels, and in different geographic areas.

When it came to teaching critical thinking skills the same kinds of obstacles cropped up over and over again such as a focus on testing and teacher accountability, which has put pressure on administrators and teachers to deliver testing results through more uniform and rigid curriculums. 

Given this and numerous other challenges, this guide provides teachers subject-oriented advice for integrating critical thinking into their curricula. Different teachers, of course, face very different challenges and circumstances to teaching critical thinking. For this reason, instead of setting out rigid lesson plans, we have offered short research synopses and ideas for critical thinking lessons and activities. We expect teachers will modify these to their needs, or that these will spark new ideas and experiments in their classrooms.

The Importance of Domain Knowledge in Teaching Critical Thinking

Despite a great deal of rhetoric about critical thinking, not enough time is actually spent teaching critical thinking. One major reason is a misconception about its nature. Critical thinking is not a single skill that can be taught, like playing the cello, or content that can be memorized, like the history of the French Revolution.  What critical thinking entails often depends on the content and discipline. 

What critical thinking entails often depends on the content and discipline.

Although there is overlap, good thinking habits and strategies in physics don’t look the same as those in literary interpretation. We must keep this in mind when we seek to teach thinking. As cognitive scientist Daniel Willingham  puts it , “Thought processes are intertwined with what is being thought about.”

What does that mean for teaching critical thinking? There is good and bad news. The bad news is that critical thinking, as a generic skill, is challenging to teach. Critical thinking skills learned in one area aren’t guaranteed to transfer to other areas.  The good news is that specific critical thinking instruction can, in many cases, be integrated into existing classroom practices. The key is to understand what constitutes deeper thinking in particular domains and implement classroom practices that leads students toward that kind of thinking. That’s what we’ve set out to do in this guide.

How to teach Critical Thinking Habits

That said, there are some habits and virtues that cut across domains when it comes to how to teach critical thinking. Teachers can make an impact by modeling these intellectual virtues, when possible, for their students.

How to Teach Critical Thinking: Sparking Curiosity. 

Young students are eager to know about the world and ask questions tirelessly. Why is the grass green? Why do zebras have stripes? Even adolescents are prone to constant questioning — though their questions sometimes have a more cynical slant. 

In the classroom, it’s not always possible to indulge every last question, and some of these questions can be disruptive. But it is still absolutely vital that educators make time to indulge and encourage the curiosity of students. Curiosity, if it’s developed and refined, is crucial to being an informed and engaged citizen of the world. 

Open-ended discussions are an excellent way to spark curiosity. We model this kind of discussion in our article on critical thinking and reading .  There you’ll find tips on how to prompt students to ask deeper moral and philosophical texts about literary texts. With practice in refining their curiosity, students will begin to develop what’s called “metacognition,” or thinking about thinking. This is a foundational part of critical thinking, in which students turn their curiosity on themselves, and begin to ask why they think and believe what they do. 

How to Teach Critical Thinking: Managing Emotions. 

Emotions may seem far afield from the ability to reason but critical thinking is emotionally difficult. Critical thinkers have to exhibit the humility to admit that they don’t know everything and they may be wrong. At the same time, they have to be confident enough to ask tough questions and challenge authority when appropriate. And, perhaps most crucially, they have to be able to consider and analyze arguments on their merits, instead of judging the person making them.

When emotions run high in the classroom, for example in a discussion of a controversial topic, it’s a great time for teachers to model these virtues. We offer tips on how to do so in our article on civics education . The goal is to give students civic competence and confidence, ultimately, contribute positively to their communities and society as a whole. 

How to Teach Critical Thinking: Checking for Bias. 

Emotional arguments can make it especially difficult to recognize and overcome biases. When we’re emotional, we usually fail to step back and look for misinterpretations, hasty conclusions, and assumptions we may have made about the people we’re arguing against.

Instruction in logic and philosophy can help students recognize biased thinking in themselves and, especially, in some of the weak reasoning they all inevitably come across online. Too often, especially in the United States, we’ve considered these topics too advanced for K-12 learners.

Check out our articles on media literacy and philosophy for more on how to help students navigate emotional appeals and understand biases, and for more tips on how to teach critical thinking. 

Download the Teachers’ Guide

(please click here)

Privacy Overview

Practicing Critical Thinking: Issues and Challenges

• First Online: 04 September 2024

Cite this chapter

• K. Venkat Reddy 3 &
• G. Suvarna Lakshmi 4  

Despite acknowledging the importance of teaching or promoting critical thinking as part of education, practicing critical thinking in the real world and life has its own challenges to be resolved. Some of them are presented in the studies included in this chapter. The first article is on the gap between the perceptions on cognitive active learning of teachers and learners. The focus of the study is on exploring learners’ perceptions on deep learning particularly in Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). Instructors facing organizational difficulties, lack of experience in synchronous learning for the students, unable to have peer interaction while learning in VLE, inadequate training for the instructors and students to teach and learning virtually, students’ not experiencing the benefits of deep learning are among the major gaps or problems identified in this study. The second article is about techniques that enhance higher order thinking skills in EFL learners by using post-reading strategies resulting in better speech production and reasoning power. The output of the research states that concept mapping and argumentation enhance EFL learners’ reasoning power when private speech is used to understand the process of thinking. The third article in this chapter is on cross-cultural psychology where the cultural influence on making inferences and participating in debates by Asian students who are studying in western institutions. Though there are intercultural differences in the inferences made because of cultural backgrounds and first language variations, they are insignificant. Then the reasons for obvious differences could be learning environment, literacy and higher education. The statement that Asian students are unable to perform well in western logic might be true not because the Asian students are less capable of thinking critically but because they are not trained in or used to western logical problems. The last article of this chapter is on assessment of critical thinking in first year dental curriculum that establishes the importance of critical thinking in dental education. The assessment is on the importance of critical thinking and the need to change the curriculum incorporating critical thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Smith, T. W., & Colby, S. A. (2007). Teaching for deep learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80 (5), 205–210.

Article   Google Scholar  

Platow, M. J., Mavor, K. I., & Grace, D. M. (2013). On the role of discipline-related self-concept in deep and surface approaches to learning among university students. Instructional Science, 41 (2), 271–285.

Reinhardt, M. M. (2010). The use of deep learning strategies in online business courses to impact student retention. American Journal of Business Education, 3 (12), 49.

Google Scholar  

Mimirinis, M., & Bhattacharya, M. (2007). Design of virtual learning environments for deep learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18 (1), 55–64.

Smart, K., & Cappel, J. (2006). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5 (1), 201–219.

Jain, P. (2015). Virtual learning environment. International Journal in IT & Engineering, 3 (5), 75–84.

Molnár, G. (2013). Challenges and opportunities in virtual and electronic learning environments. In IEEE 11th international symposium on intelligent systems and informatics .

Riley, S. K. L. (2008). Teaching in virtual worlds: Opportunities and challenges. Setting Knowledge Free: The Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 5 (5), 127–135.

Warden, C. A., Stanworth, J. O., Ren, J. B., & Warden, A. R. (2013). Synchronous learning best practices: An action research study. Computers & Education, 63 , 197–207.

Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15 (2), 189–212.

Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52 (1), 141–146.

Tyler, J., & Zurick, A. (2014). Synchronous versus asynchronous learning-is there a measurable difference? In Proceedings of the 2014 Institute for Behavioral and Applied Management Conference, IBAM22 . October 9–11, 2014, 52.

Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29 (2), 205–234.

Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12 (1), 73–86.

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19 (3), 133–148.

Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50 (3), 838–852.

Postareff, L., Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Factors contributing to changes in a deep approach to learning in different learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 18 , 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9186-1

Dolmans, D., Loyens, S., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Science Education, 21 (5), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6

Wildemuth, B. M. (Ed.). (2016). Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science . ABC-CLIO.

Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2016). Qualitative research . Sage.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 54–67.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language . MIT Press.

McCafferty, S. G. (1994). The use of private speech by adult ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 135–156). Ablex.

Centeno-Cortes, B., & Jimenez Jimenez, A. F. (2004). Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of the L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00052.x

Ghanizadeh, A., & Mirzaee, S. (2012). Critical thinking: How to enhance it in language classes . Lambert Academic Publishing.

Choi, I., Nisbett, R., & Smith, E. E. (1997a). Culture, categorization and inductive reasoning. Cognition, 65 (1), 15–32.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108 (2), 291–310.

Peng, K. (1997). Naive dialecticism and its effects on reasoning and judgement about contradiction . University of Michigan.

Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. (1996). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in the understanding of physical causality. In Paper presented at the science and culture: Proceedings of the seventh interdisciplinary conference on science and culture .

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline . Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently … and why . Free Press.

Ji, L.-J., Zhang, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (1), 57–65.

Norenzayan, A. (2001). Rule-based and experience-based thinking: The cognitive consequences of intellectual traditions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 62 (6-B), 2992.

Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26 (5), 653–684.

Peng, K., Ames, D. R., & Knowles, E. D. (2000). Culture and human inference: Perspectives from three traditions. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 1–2). Oxford University Press.

Whorf, B. L. (1962b). The relation of habitual thought to language, and an American Indian model of the universe from language. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin . MIT Press.

Davidson, D. (1984). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In inquiries into truth and interpretation . Oxford University Press.

Devitt, M., & Sterelny, K. (1997). Language and reality . MIT Press.

Gellatly, A. (1995). Colourful whorfian ideas: Linguistic and cultural influences on the perception and cognition of colour and on the investigation of time. Mind and Language, 10 (3).

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct . Penguin Books.

Book   Google Scholar  

Davies, W. M. (2006b). Intensive teaching formats: A review. Issues in Educational Research, 16 (1), 1–20.

Felix, U., & Lawson, M. (1994). Evaluation of an integrated bridging program course on academic writing for overseas postgraduate students. Higher Education Research and Development, 13 (1), 59–70.

Felix, U., & Martin, C. (1991). A report on the program of instruction in essay writing techniques for overseas post-graduate students . School of Education, Flinders University.

Brand, D. (1987). The new whizz kids: Why Asian Americans are doing well and what it costs them. Time, August (42–50) .

Murphy, D. (1987). Offshore education: A Hong Kong perspective. Australian Universities Review, 30 (2), 43–44.

Wong, N.-Y. (2002). Conceptions of doing and learning mathematics among Chinese. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23 (2), 211–229.

Accreditation standards for dental education programs. Commission on dental accreditation. Commission on dental Education 2019.

Elangovan, S., Venugopalan, S. R., Srinivasan, S., Karimbux, N. Y., Weistroffer, P., & Allareddy, V. (2016). Integration of basic-clinical sciences, PBL, CBL, and IPE in U.S. dental schools’ curricula and a proposed integrated curriculum model for the future. Journal of Dental Education, 80 , 281–290.

Duong, M. T., Cothron, A. E., Lawson, N. C., & Doherty, E. H. (2018). U.S. Dental schools’ preparation for the integrated national board dental examination. Journal of Dental Education, 82 , 252–259.

Annansingh, F. (2019). Mind the gap: Cognitive active learning in virtual learning environment perception of instructors and students. Education and Information Technologies . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09949-5

Mirzaee, S., & Maftoon, P. (2016). An examination of Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory in second language acquisition: The role of higher order thinking enhancing techniques and the EFL learners’ use of private speech in the construction of reasoning. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0022-7

Martin Davies, W. (2006). Cognitive contours: Recent work on cross-cultural psychology and its relevance for education. Studies in Philosophy and Education . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-9012-4

van der Hoeven, D., Truong, T. T. L. A., Holland, J. N., & Quock, R. L. (2020). Assessment of critical thinking in a first-year dental curriculum. Medical. Science Educator . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00914-3

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Training and Development, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

K. Venkat Reddy

Department of English Language Teaching, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

G. Suvarna Lakshmi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of English Language Teaching, English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Reddy, K.V., Lakshmi, G.S. (2024). Practicing Critical Thinking: Issues and Challenges. In: Reddy, K.V., Lakshmi, G.S. (eds) Critical Thinking for Professional and Language Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37951-2_5

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37951-2_5

Published : 04 September 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-37950-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-37951-2

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Advancing Critical Thinking in Education: Integrating AI Tools and Technologies into Pedagogical Practice

• September 2024
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Ravi Shankar
• Tabrez Ahmad
• De Gregorio Giovanni
• Dunn Pietro
• Daphne Keller
• Amélie Heldt
• Kristina Čufar
• Tomer Shadmy
• Chiara Poletti
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

• [email protected]
• Login / Register

Why Critical Thinking Is Important: Skills and Benefits Explained

Article 07 Sep 2024 144 0

Critical thinking is one of the most essential cognitive skills, vital for navigating today’s complex world. Whether you are a student, educator, professional, or lifelong learner, developing critical thinking abilities can dramatically improve your problem-solving skills, decision-making processes, and intellectual independence.

What is Critical Thinking?

At its core, critical thinking refers to the ability to think clearly and rationally, understanding the logical connections between ideas. It involves analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information to form judgments. Rather than accepting information at face value, critical thinkers delve deeper, questioning assumptions and assessing the evidence before drawing conclusions.

Components of Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is a multifaceted skill, which includes:

• Analysis : Breaking down complex information into smaller, more manageable parts.
• Evaluation : Judging the credibility of sources and the strength of arguments.
• Logical reasoning : Making decisions based on coherent and well-structured thought processes.
• Intellectual independence : Forming opinions based on careful examination rather than external influences.

By understanding these components, you can build a strong foundation for developing critical thinking skills , applicable to all aspects of life.

Importance of Critical Thinking in Daily Life

Why is critical thinking important? In today’s information-driven world, where we are constantly bombarded with data, opinions, and perspectives, being able to distinguish facts from fiction is essential. Critical thinking plays a key role in decision-making , problem-solving , and understanding complex issues . Let’s explore its significance in various areas:

1. Decision-Making

Effective decision-making requires the ability to weigh options, consider consequences, and anticipate outcomes. Critical thinking enables individuals to make informed decisions based on facts and reason, rather than emotions or bias. For example, when choosing a career path, a critical thinker will evaluate job market trends, personal interests, and long-term goals to make a well-informed decision.

2. Problem-Solving

In both personal and professional environments, problem-solving is an everyday necessity. Critical thinking enhances your ability to tackle challenges by breaking problems into manageable parts, analyzing potential solutions, and selecting the most effective approach. When faced with a complex issue at work, for example, a critical thinker will systematically evaluate possible solutions rather than jumping to conclusions.

3. Understanding Complex Issues

Whether in academics, work, or social interactions, understanding multifaceted issues requires higher-order thinking . Critical thinking allows you to approach these issues objectively, avoiding oversimplifications or emotional reactions. This skill is particularly valuable in today’s polarized world, where complex social, political, and environmental issues require careful thought and nuanced understanding.

Benefits of Developing Critical Thinking Skills

1. improved problem-solving abilities.

One of the most significant advantages of honing critical thinking is the improvement in problem-solving abilities. By learning to break down issues and consider various angles, you become adept at finding solutions that others might overlook. This skill is particularly valuable in fields like business, technology, and education, where innovation and creativity are prized.

2. Better Decision-Making

Good decisions stem from the ability to evaluate situations clearly and rationally. Critical thinking ensures that you are not swayed by emotional or impulsive reactions but instead base your decisions on sound reasoning. This leads to more consistent, reliable outcomes in both personal and professional settings.

3. Enhanced Communication Skills

Effective communication is built on clear thinking. By developing critical thinking skills , you improve your ability to express ideas clearly and persuasively. Whether in writing or speech, critical thinkers can present their ideas logically and support them with solid evidence, making their arguments more compelling.

4. Increased Intellectual Independence

Critical thinkers develop the habit of questioning information and seeking their own answers. This fosters intellectual independence , enabling individuals to form their own opinions and perspectives based on careful analysis rather than relying on others’ viewpoints. This independence is crucial in a world where misinformation is rampant.

5. Boosted Creativity and Innovation

Critical thinking is not only about logic; it also encourages creativity. By questioning assumptions and exploring new possibilities, critical thinkers often develop innovative solutions and ideas. This is particularly beneficial in fields that require out-of-the-box thinking, such as technology, entrepreneurship, and the arts.

How to Develop Critical Thinking Skills

Developing critical thinking skills is a lifelong process, but with intentional practice, anyone can improve. Here are actionable steps you can take:

1. Question Assumptions

The first step in critical thinking is to challenge your assumptions. Ask yourself: Why do I believe this? What evidence supports this claim? By questioning assumptions, you open your mind to new perspectives and solutions.

2. Analyze Information Critically

When presented with information, whether in the form of news, reports, or advice, practice analyzing it critically. What is the source of the information? Is it reliable? Are there biases that could affect the interpretation of the data? Critical thinking requires that you not only take information at face value but also dig deeper to understand its context.

3. Seek Out Diverse Perspectives

Exposure to different viewpoints strengthens your ability to think critically. By engaging with a wide range of opinions and ideas, you can challenge your preconceptions and develop a more balanced view of complex issues.

4. Reflect on Your Thinking Process

Reflective thinking is an integral part of critical thinking . After making decisions or solving problems, take time to evaluate your thought process. What worked well? Where could you improve? This self-reflection helps refine your thinking skills over time.

5. Practice Problem-Solving in Real-Life Scenarios

A great way to develop critical thinking is by applying it to real-life situations. Take on complex tasks at work, analyze current events, or even engage in strategy games that require planning and decision-making. By practicing problem-solving regularly, you will sharpen your critical thinking abilities.

Teaching Critical Thinking Skills

Critical thinking is not an innate ability; it must be nurtured and developed, particularly in educational settings. Here’s how educators can teach these essential skills:

1. Encourage Open-Ended Questions

In the classroom, asking open-ended questions encourages students to think critically rather than simply regurgitate information. Questions like “Why do you think this is true?” or “How would you solve this problem?” prompt students to analyze information and consider alternative solutions.

2. Promote Active Learning

Engaging students in active learning exercises, such as debates, group discussions, or problem-based learning, helps develop their critical thinking . These activities require students to articulate their thoughts, evaluate others’ perspectives, and revise their ideas based on evidence.

3. Teach Metacognitive Skills

Metacognition, or thinking about one’s thinking, is crucial for critical thinking . Teachers can encourage students to reflect on their thought processes by asking them to explain how they arrived at their conclusions. This practice helps students become more aware of their thinking patterns and biases.

Critical thinking is a powerful skill that enhances decision-making, problem-solving, and intellectual independence. It is essential in today’s fast-paced, information-rich world, where the ability to analyze information and make informed decisions is critical. By developing critical thinking skills , you can navigate complex issues with confidence, communicate more effectively, and innovate in both personal and professional environments.

To enhance your critical thinking , practice questioning assumptions, analyzing information critically, and seeking out diverse perspectives. Whether in education, work, or daily life, these skills will equip you to face challenges with clarity and logic, leading to better decisions and greater personal growth.

• Latest Articles

Innovative Ways to Expand Knowledge Beyond the Classroom

Social and emotional learning for student well-being, ai and the future of humans: impact, ethics, and collaboration, why ai is the future: innovations driving global change, how information technology is shaping the future of education, the impact of ai on employment: positive and negative effects on jobs, negative impact of ai on employment: automation and job loss, top 10 benefits of infographics in education for enhanced learning, positive impact of ai on employment: opportunities & benefits, ai’s influence on job market trends | future of employment, improve your writing skills: a beginner's guide, shifts in pop culture & their societal implications, top study tips for exam success: effective strategies for academic achievement, 9 practical tips to start reading more every day, top study strategies for student success, personalized learning: tailored education for every student, how to study smarter, not harder: tips for success, 10 important roles of technology in education, apply online.

Find Detailed information on:

• Top Colleges & Universities
• Popular Courses
• Exam Preparation
• Admissions & Eligibility
• College Rankings

Sign Up or Login

Not a Member Yet! Join Us it's Free.

Already have account Please Login

• Our Mission

There has been an error with the video.

AI Tool Demo: Creative Uses for ChatGPT in History and ELA

Assistant editor Daniel Leonard shares a few interesting applications of ChatGPT that teachers have adopted to drive critical thinking and deeper analysis.

OpenAI’s large language model chatbot, ChatGPT , took the world by storm when it was launched in November 2022—and, nearly two years later, teachers are still finding creative, new ways to use the tool in their classrooms. 

There continues to be much debate: While some educators are concerned that the chatbot stifles learning by automatically outputting responses with no thought required on the part of the user, others are more optimistic about the tool. In fact, we’ve heard from a number of teachers who are using ChatGPT for critical thinking activities that help their students hone their analytical skills—and reckon with the limitations of the tool itself—in a fun and engaging way.

History teachers , for example, are getting ChatGPT to role-play as historical figures, from Cleopatra to Einstein. Their students interact with these digital imitations of figures from history, asking them questions and learning more about their lives. Then, students are asked to cross-reference ChatGPT’s output (which is often error-prone) with reliable external sources, fact-checking the AI and better understanding its tendency to “hallucinate” answers.

There are a multitude of ways to use the tool in English language arts (ELA), too. While some English teachers are trying out chatbots (of fictional characters) or using ChatGPT in writing lessons , others are having the tool output text that can be compared with famous works of literature—like Shakespeare’s sonnets or Lincoln’s speeches—so that students can better analyze the unique tone and style of various writers (and see how ChatGPT’s own tone tends to be quite bland in comparison).

Edutopia’s assistant editor Daniel Leonard walks through these teacher-tested ChatGPT use cases—showcasing some prompts to try out, the kinds of responses educators can expect to receive, and how to use them to drive critical thinking in the classroom.

To read about other creative ways teachers are leveraging AI tools in the classroom—from image generators to language apps—check out Leonard’s feature for Edutopia, “ 9 Tips for Using AI for Learning (and Fun!) .”

• Title & authors

Barrios, Krizzalyn C., and Nelia T. Salvador. "Activating Strategies in a Constructivist Teaching of Trends, Networks and Critical Thinking in the 21st Century Culture." 4th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Industry and Academic Research , Candelaria, Philippines , July 2023 . Institute of Industry and Academic Research Incorporated, 2023, pp. 462-467.

Download citation file:

This research which was participated in by 98 Grade 12 students enrolled for the school year 2022 – 2023 under the Humanities and Social Sciences Strand was an attempt to find whether the use of activating strategies, written and non–written, improved the level of critical thinking skills of the participants. Using a one–group pretest–posttest design, it gathered information on the use of written and non–written activating strategies using a survey questionnaire and on the level of critical thinking skills using a test. Both instruments were teacher–made and expert-validated. Results revealed that for the respondents, the use of written and non–written activating strategies is generally accepted. Their critical thinking skills can be described as ranging from needs improvement to satisfactory based for almost all skills before the use of activating strategies, but after its implementation, their scores have drastically shifted from very satisfactory up to outstanding. The test of correlation also revealed no significant relationship among the variables except for some variables. The use of activating strategies have also revealed that it improved the critical thinking skills of the respondents. Thus, its use must be encouraged especially when trying to present new lessons and if skills acquisition is desired.

Table of contents