presentation paper buy

Please contact the site administrator

Thank you for your interest in Epson. To subscribe and receive promotional emails, please visit Epson Global to find your local site.

Our system shows that the email that you entered might be incorrect or undeliverable. Please confirm your email address is correct before continuing. Email should be a [email protected] format with no space before or after.

• © 2024 Epson America, Inc.
• Terms of Use
• Accessibility
• CA Supply Chains Act
• CA Privacy Rights
• Privacy Policy
• Your Privacy Choices

• Online Course
• ET Notebooks
• Posters & Paper
• Hogpen Hill Farms

Posters & Graph Paper

• ET Modern | Hogpen Hill Farms

Napoleon’s March

Charles Joseph Minard 22" x 15"

Napoleon’s March – French and English Translation

Charles Joseph Minard French & English Translation 20.5" x 22.4"

Historic Visual Diary of Spaceflight: Cyclogram

Georgi Grechko 36" x 20"

The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint

Edward Tufte 22" x 17"

Graph Paper 1/4″-1/2″ Combination Grid

Letter: 8.5" x 11" 1/4"-1/2" Combination Grid Qty: 2 Pads (48 sheets per pad)

Graph Paper 1cm Grid

Letter: 8.5" x 11" 1 cm Grid Qty: 2 Pads (48 sheets per pad)

Tabloid: 11" x 17" 1/4"-1/2" Combination Grid Qty: 1 Pad (48 sheets)

Tabloid: 11" x 17" 1cm  Grid Qty: 1 Pad (48 sheets)

• P.O. Box 430 Cheshire, CT 06410
• 800-822-2454
• [email protected]

• Integrations
• Learning Center

MoSCoW Prioritization

What is moscow prioritization.

MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements. 

  The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the “W” in MoSCoW to mean “wish.”

What is the History of the MoSCoW Method?

Software development expert Dai Clegg created the MoSCoW method while working at Oracle. He designed the framework to help his team prioritize tasks during development work on product releases.

You can find a detailed account of using MoSCoW prioritization in the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) handbook . But because MoSCoW can prioritize tasks within any time-boxed project, teams have adapted the method for a broad range of uses.

How Does MoSCoW Prioritization Work?

Before running a MoSCoW analysis, a few things need to happen. First, key stakeholders and the product team need to get aligned on objectives and prioritization factors. Then, all participants must agree on which initiatives to prioritize.

At this point, your team should also discuss how they will settle any disagreements in prioritization. If you can establish how to resolve disputes before they come up, you can help prevent those disagreements from holding up progress.

Finally, you’ll also want to reach a consensus on what percentage of resources you’d like to allocate to each category.

With the groundwork complete, you may begin determining which category is most appropriate for each initiative. But, first, let’s further break down each category in the MoSCoW method.

Start prioritizing your roadmap

Moscow prioritization categories.

1. Must-have initiatives

As the name suggests, this category consists of initiatives that are “musts” for your team. They represent non-negotiable needs for the project, product, or release in question. For example, if you’re releasing a healthcare application, a must-have initiative may be security functionalities that help maintain compliance.

The “must-have” category requires the team to complete a mandatory task. If you’re unsure about whether something belongs in this category, ask yourself the following.

If the product won’t work without an initiative, or the release becomes useless without it, the initiative is most likely a “must-have.”

2. Should-have initiatives

Should-have initiatives are just a step below must-haves. They are essential to the product, project, or release, but they are not vital. If left out, the product or project still functions. However, the initiatives may add significant value.

“Should-have” initiatives are different from “must-have” initiatives in that they can get scheduled for a future release without impacting the current one. For example, performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new functionality may be “should-have” initiatives. Without them, the product still works.

3. Could-have initiatives

Another way of describing “could-have” initiatives is nice-to-haves. “Could-have” initiatives are not necessary to the core function of the product. However, compared with “should-have” initiatives, they have a much smaller impact on the outcome if left out.

So, initiatives placed in the “could-have” category are often the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category ends up larger than expected.

4. Will not have (this time)

One benefit of the MoSCoW method is that it places several initiatives in the “will-not-have” category. The category can manage expectations about what the team will not include in a specific release (or another timeframe you’re prioritizing).

Placing initiatives in the “will-not-have” category is one way to help prevent scope creep . If initiatives are in this category, the team knows they are not a priority for this specific time frame. 

Some initiatives in the “will-not-have” group will be prioritized in the future, while others are not likely to happen. Some teams decide to differentiate between those by creating a subcategory within this group.

How Can Development Teams Use MoSCoW?

  Although Dai Clegg developed the approach to help prioritize tasks around his team’s limited time, the MoSCoW method also works when a development team faces limitations other than time. For example: 

Prioritize based on budgetary constraints.

What if a development team’s limiting factor is not a deadline but a tight budget imposed by the company? Working with the product managers, the team can use MoSCoW first to decide on the initiatives that represent must-haves and the should-haves. Then, using the development department’s budget as the guide, the team can figure out which items they can complete. 

Prioritize based on the team’s skillsets.

A cross-functional product team might also find itself constrained by the experience and expertise of its developers. If the product roadmap calls for functionality the team does not have the skills to build, this limiting factor will play into scoring those items in their MoSCoW analysis.

Prioritize based on competing needs at the company.

Cross-functional teams can also find themselves constrained by other company priorities. The team wants to make progress on a new product release, but the executive staff has created tight deadlines for further releases in the same timeframe. In this case, the team can use MoSCoW to determine which aspects of their desired release represent must-haves and temporarily backlog everything else.

What Are the Drawbacks of MoSCoW Prioritization?

  Although many product and development teams have prioritized MoSCoW, the approach has potential pitfalls. Here are a few examples.

1. An inconsistent scoring process can lead to tasks placed in the wrong categories.

  One common criticism against MoSCoW is that it does not include an objective methodology for ranking initiatives against each other. Your team will need to bring this methodology to your analysis. The MoSCoW approach works only to ensure that your team applies a consistent scoring system for all initiatives.

Pro tip: One proven method is weighted scoring, where your team measures each initiative on your backlog against a standard set of cost and benefit criteria. You can use the weighted scoring approach in ProductPlan’s roadmap app .

2. Not including all relevant stakeholders can lead to items placed in the wrong categories.

To know which of your team’s initiatives represent must-haves for your product and which are merely should-haves, you will need as much context as possible.

For example, you might need someone from your sales team to let you know how important (or unimportant) prospective buyers view a proposed new feature.

One pitfall of the MoSCoW method is that you could make poor decisions about where to slot each initiative unless your team receives input from all relevant stakeholders. 

3. Team bias for (or against) initiatives can undermine MoSCoW’s effectiveness.

Because MoSCoW does not include an objective scoring method, your team members can fall victim to their own opinions about certain initiatives. 

One risk of using MoSCoW prioritization is that a team can mistakenly think MoSCoW itself represents an objective way of measuring the items on their list. They discuss an initiative, agree that it is a “should have,” and move on to the next.

But your team will also need an objective and consistent framework for ranking all initiatives. That is the only way to minimize your team’s biases in favor of items or against them.

When Do You Use the MoSCoW Method for Prioritization?

MoSCoW prioritization is effective for teams that want to include representatives from the whole organization in their process. You can capture a broader perspective by involving participants from various functional departments.

Another reason you may want to use MoSCoW prioritization is it allows your team to determine how much effort goes into each category. Therefore, you can ensure you’re delivering a good variety of initiatives in each release.

What Are Best Practices for Using MoSCoW Prioritization?

If you’re considering giving MoSCoW prioritization a try, here are a few steps to keep in mind. Incorporating these into your process will help your team gain more value from the MoSCoW method.

1. Choose an objective ranking or scoring system.

Remember, MoSCoW helps your team group items into the appropriate buckets—from must-have items down to your longer-term wish list. But MoSCoW itself doesn’t help you determine which item belongs in which category.

You will need a separate ranking methodology. You can choose from many, such as:

• Weighted scoring
• Value vs. complexity
• Buy-a-feature
• Opportunity scoring

For help finding the best scoring methodology for your team, check out ProductPlan’s article: 7 strategies to choose the best features for your product .

2. Seek input from all key stakeholders.

To make sure you’re placing each initiative into the right bucket—must-have, should-have, could-have, or won’t-have—your team needs context. 

At the beginning of your MoSCoW method, your team should consider which stakeholders can provide valuable context and insights. Sales? Customer success? The executive staff? Product managers in another area of your business? Include them in your initiative scoring process if you think they can help you see opportunities or threats your team might miss. 

3. Share your MoSCoW process across your organization.

MoSCoW gives your team a tangible way to show your organization prioritizing initiatives for your products or projects. 

The method can help you build company-wide consensus for your work, or at least help you show stakeholders why you made the decisions you did.

Communicating your team’s prioritization strategy also helps you set expectations across the business. When they see your methodology for choosing one initiative over another, stakeholders in other departments will understand that your team has thought through and weighed all decisions you’ve made. 

If any stakeholders have an issue with one of your decisions, they will understand that they can’t simply complain—they’ll need to present you with evidence to alter your course of action.  

Related Terms

2×2 prioritization matrix / Eisenhower matrix / DACI decision-making framework / ICE scoring model / RICE scoring model

Prioritizing your roadmap using our guide

Talk to an expert.

Schedule a few minutes with us to share more about your product roadmapping goals and we'll tailor a demo to show you how easy it is to build strategic roadmaps, align behind customer needs, prioritize, and measure success.

Share on Mastodon

• Office Products
• Office & School Supplies
• Copy & Printing Paper
• Photo Paper

No featured offers available

• Quality Price,
• Reliable delivery option, and
• Seller who offers good customer service

Sorry, there was a problem.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Epson Premium Presentation Paper MATTE (8x10 Inches, 50 Sheets) (S041467),Bright White

Brand	Epson
Color	Bright White
Item Weight	0.06 Pounds
Paper Finish	Matte
Sheet Size	8x10 Inches

About this item

• Heavyweight, matte, bright white paper
• 50 borderless 8-by-10-inch sheets per package
• Great for all your creative photo printing needs
• For use with Stylus Photo 780/1280
• A quality Epson product

Top Brand: Epson

Product information, technical details.

Manufacturer	‎Epson
Brand	‎Epson
Item Weight	‎0.96 ounces
Product Dimensions	‎8.5 x 10.5 x 1 inches
Item model number	‎S041467
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer	‎No
Color	‎Bright White
Material Type	‎Paper
Number of Items	‎1
Size	‎8" X 10"
Sheet Size	‎8x10 Inches
Paper Weight	‎18
Paper Finish	‎Matte
Manufacturer Part Number	‎S041467

Additional Information

ASIN	B00005A9W3
Customer Reviews	4.5 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank	#25,269 in Office Products ( ) #73 in
Date First Available	November 25, 2006

Warranty & Support

Amazon.com Return Policy: You can return many items you have purchased within 30 days following delivery of the item to you. Our Voluntary 30-Day Return Guarantee does not affect your legal right of withdrawal in any way. You can find out more about the exceptions and conditions .

Fields with an asterisk * are required

: : : Enter the store name where you found this product : Please select province : to provide feedback. \n' + ' ' ); } function getThankYouDiv(thankMsg) { return ( ' \n' + '

' ); } function getLoadingGifDiv() { return '

Looking for specific info?

From the manufacturer.

Videos for this product

Click to play video

Your prints are going to look amazing!

What's in the box

• Photo Paper (Paper)
• Inkjet Photo Quality Paper

Product Description

Epson's heavyweight, matte photo paper produces 8-by-10-inch borderless photo prints. This paper is great for crafts projects requiring heavier paper stock, and is designed specifically for the Stylus Photo 780 and 1280 printers.

Similar brands on Amazon

Customer reviews

• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 77% 10% 6% 2% 5% 77%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 77% 10% 6% 2% 5% 10%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 77% 10% 6% 2% 5% 6%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 77% 10% 6% 2% 5% 2%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 77% 10% 6% 2% 5% 5%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Customers say

Customers like the value, color, ink, and quality of the print copy paper. For example, they mention that it reproduces rich colors and renders subtle tones beautifully. That said, they appreciate performance, and versatility. Opinions are mixed on thickness.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Customers are satisfied with the quality of the paper. They mention that it produces very high-quality prints, is thick, and excellent. Some say that the paper looks good printing with photos and that it prints beautifully.

"... This paper is perfect . It's quite thick- thicker than big-box cardstock, photo paper, or lower grade watercolor paper...." Read more

"... Great quality " Read more

"...Worked great not too thin yet not too thick. All print came out clear and didn't smug . I would recommend this product and would use it again." Read more

"...The photo quality isn't *bad* by any means, I think the slight texture on the page gives it a little of a softer focus than if you printed on a..." Read more

Customers find the print copy paper versatile. They say it's perfect for resumes, headshots, presentation projects, scenics, landscapes, and portraits. Some say it is excellent for alternative processes and great for posters.

"...All in all, this is great paper. Nice , bright image and thick, sturdy paper. Highly recommended." Read more

"...slightly warmer than Epson's Ultra Premium Glossy photo paper, perfect for scenics , landscapes and portraits...." Read more

" Perfect for presentation projects . Prints images and text clear. No problems." Read more

"SO happy I found this paper! I am an actress and this is the perfect resume paper as it is already the size of an 8x10, you don't have to do any..." Read more

Customers are satisfied with the color of the paper. They mention that it reproduces rich colors and renders subtle tones beautifully. The color turn out the way they want it to, and the image is sharp and bright.

"...It dried fairly quickly, and the image was sharp , but if you plan on printing multiples of a something in one pass, you may want to check the first..." Read more

"...Once I figured out which side to print on, I was amazed at how nice my art looked !..." Read more

"...They also look extremely professional- especially stapled to the back of a headshot. The ink shows up on the paper perfectly with no smearing...." Read more

"...It really absorbs the ink and the colors are vivid . No smears or anything." Read more

Customers are satisfied with the performance of the print copy paper. They mention that it works well for printing pictures with a matte finish, has no problems, and is exactly what they expected. Some say that the paper is not too thin yet not too thick, and that it's perfect for their needs.

"...I purchased this to use as pages of a book I had done up. Worked great not too thin yet not too thick. All print came out clear and didn't smug...." Read more

"I needed paper for printing pictures to hang in my new home. This paper worked perfectly ...." Read more

"The is printer paper for photos. It was perfect for what I needed " Read more

"Perfect for presentation projects. Prints images and text clear. No problems ." Read more

Customers appreciate the value of the print copy paper. They say it's a great product with a good price and quality.

"...The price and quality are great ." Read more

"Paper is of excellent quality and prints quite well. Price is great too ." Read more

"Great product, great price ." Read more

"Great product. Great value ." Read more

Customers are satisfied with the ink. They mention that the inking shows up on the paper perfectly, and the paper absorbs the inked well.

"...The ink shows up on the paper perfectly with no smearing...." Read more

"...This will be my paper of choice for printing. It really absorbs the ink and the colors are vivid. No smears or anything." Read more

"It fit into my machine. The size is as advertised. It's white. Ink stays on it ...." Read more

Customers are satisfied with the picture quality of the print copy paper. They mention that it is the best for pictures and perfect for actor headshots photos.

"The best for pictures ..." Read more

" Perfect for actor headshots photos ...." Read more

" Great Picture Quality ..." Read more

Customers are mixed about the thickness of the print copy paper. Some mention it's thick, sturdy, and perfect, while others say it'd be too thick and heavy.

"Great product. Paper is not quite as heavy as I thought it would be, but I think it will be great for the art prints I plan to use it for." Read more

"...This paper is perfect. It's quite thick- thicker than big-box cardstock, photo paper, or lower grade watercolor paper...." Read more

"Good paper, but its thinner than I was hoping for ." Read more

"...Worked great not too thin yet not too thick . All print came out clear and didn't smug. I would recommend this product and would use it again." Read more

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• About Amazon
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell products on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Become an Affiliate
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Amazon and COVID-19
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices

• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices