Note cards indicate you accurately researched a variety of information sources, recorded and interpreted significant facts, meaningful graphics, accurate sounds and evaluated alternative points of view.
Note cards show you recorded relevant information from multiple sources of information, evaluated and synthesized relevant information.
Note cards show you misinterpreted statements, graphics and questions and failed to identify relevant arguments.
Note cards show you recorded information from four or less resources, did not find graphics or sounds, and ignored alternative points of view.
___/3
The storyboard illustrates the slide presentation structure with thumbnail sketches of each slide including: title of slide, text, background color, placement & size of graphic, fonts - color, size, type for text and headings, hyperlinks (list URLs of any site linked from the slide), narration text, and audio files (if any). All slides are numbered, and there is a logical sequence to the presentation.
The thumbnail sketches on the storyboard include titles and text for each slide and are in sequential order.
The thumbnail sketches on the storyboard are not in a logical sequence and have incomplete information.
There a very few thumbnail sketches on the storyboard and do not provide an overview of the presentation.
2 points
___/3
The introduction presents the overall topic and draws the audience into the presentation with compelling questions or by relating to the audience's interests or goals.
The introduction is clear and coherent and relates to the topic.
The introduction shows some structure but does not create a strong sense of what is to follow. May be overly detailed or incomplete and is somewhat appealing to the audience.
The introduction does not orient the audience to what will follow.
The sequencing is unclear and does not appear interesting or relevant to the audience.
___/3
The content is written clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information.
The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Information is accurate, current and comes mainly from * primary sources.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information.
Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose.
Includes some persuasive information with few facts.
Some of the information may not seem to fit.
Sources used appear unreliable.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.
Includes little persuasive information and only one or two facts about the topic.
Information is incomplete, out of date and/or incorrect.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
___/3
The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
Use of italics, bold, and indentations enhances readability.
Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point.
The background and colors enhance the readability of text.
Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
Overall readability is difficult with lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text and small point size of fonts, inappropriate contrasting colors, poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting.
___/3
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings and white space.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or uses a distracting background.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings and subheadings to enhance the readability.
___/3
Sources of information are properly cited and the audience can determine the credibility and authority of the information presented.
All sources of information are clearly identified and credited using appropriate citation format.
Most sources of information use proper citation format, and sources are documented to make it possible to check on the accuracy of information.
Sometimes copyright guidelines are followed and some information, photos and graphics do not include proper citation format.
No way to check validity of information.
___/3
The graphics, sound and/or animation assist in presenting an overall theme and enhance understanding of concept, ideas and relationships.
Original images are created using proper size and resolution, and all images enhance the content.
There is a consistent visual theme.
The graphics, sound/and or animation visually depict material and assist the audience in understanding the flow of information or content.
Original images are used.
Images are proper size, resolution.
Some of the graphics, sounds, and/or animations seem unrelated to the topic/theme and do not enhance the overall concepts.
Most images are clip art or recycled from the internet.
Images are too large/small in size.
Images are poorly cropped or the color/resolution is fuzzy.
The graphics, sounds, and/or animations are unrelated to the content.
Graphics do not enhance understanding of the content, or are distracting decorations that create a busy feeling and detract from the content.
___/3
The text is written with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
The text is clearly written with little or no editing required for grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors distract or impair readability.
(three or more errors)
Errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader, and major editing and revision is required.
(more than five errors)
TOTAL POINTS
___ /27
* Primary sources can include original letters and diaries, personal observations, interviews, first-hand accounts, newspaper articles, magazine articles, journal articles, Web pages, audio recordings, video productions and photography.
Examples of Other Rubrics
Presentation Design
Presentation Rubric for a College Project
We seem to have an unavoidable relationship with public speaking throughout our lives. From our kindergarten years, when our presentations are nothing more than a few seconds of reciting cute words in front of our class…
...till our grown up years, when things get a little more serious, and the success of our presentations may determine getting funds for our business, or obtaining an academic degree when defending our thesis.
By the time we reach our mid 20’s, we become worryingly used to evaluations based on our presentations. Yet, for some reason, we’re rarely told the traits upon which we are being evaluated. Most colleges and business schools for instance use a PowerPoint presentation rubric to evaluate their students. Funny thing is, they’re not usually that open about sharing it with their students (as if that would do any harm!).
What is a presentation rubric?
A presentation rubric is a systematic and standardized tool used to evaluate and assess the quality and effectiveness of a presentation. It provides a structured framework for instructors, evaluators, or peers to assess various aspects of a presentation, such as content, delivery, organization, and overall performance. Presentation rubrics are commonly used in educational settings, business environments, and other contexts where presentations are a key form of communication.
A typical presentation rubric includes a set of criteria and a scale for rating or scoring each criterion. The criteria are specific aspects or elements of the presentation that are considered essential for a successful presentation. The scale assigns a numerical value or descriptive level to each criterion, ranging from poor or unsatisfactory to excellent or outstanding.
Common criteria found in presentation rubrics may include:
Content: This criterion assesses the quality and relevance of the information presented. It looks at factors like accuracy, depth of knowledge, use of evidence, and the clarity of key messages.
Organization: Organization evaluates the structure and flow of the presentation. It considers how well the introduction, body, and conclusion are structured and whether transitions between sections are smooth.
Delivery: Delivery assesses the presenter's speaking skills, including vocal tone, pace, clarity, and engagement with the audience. It also looks at nonverbal communication, such as body language and eye contact.
Visual Aids: If visual aids like slides or props are used, this criterion evaluates their effectiveness, relevance, and clarity. It may also assess the design and layout of visual materials.
Audience Engagement: This criterion measures the presenter's ability to connect with the audience, maintain their interest, and respond to questions or feedback.
Time Management: Time management assesses whether the presenter stayed within the allotted time for the presentation. Going significantly over or under the time limit can affect the overall effectiveness of the presentation.
Creativity and Innovation: In some cases, rubrics may include criteria related to the creative and innovative aspects of the presentation, encouraging presenters to think outside the box.
Overall Impact: This criterion provides an overall assessment of the presentation's impact on the audience, considering how well it achieved its intended purpose and whether it left a lasting impression.
“We’re used to giving presentations, yet we’re rarely told the traits upon which we’re being evaluated.
Well, we don’t believe in shutting down information. Quite the contrary: we think the best way to practice your speech is to know exactly what is being tested! By evaluating each trait separately, you can:
Acknowledge the complexity of public speaking, that goes far beyond subject knowledge.
Address your weaker spots, and work on them to improve your presentation as a whole.
I’ve assembled a simple Presentation Rubric, based on a great document by the NC State University, and I've also added a few rows of my own, so you can evaluate your presentation in pretty much any scenario!
CREATE PRESENTATION
What is tested in this powerpoint presentation rubric.
The Rubric contemplates 7 traits, which are as follows:
Now let's break down each trait so you can understand what they mean, and how to assess each one:
Presentation Rubric
How to use this Rubric?:
The Rubric is pretty self explanatory, so I'm just gonna give you some ideas as to how to use it. The ideal scenario is to ask someone else to listen to your presentation and evaluate you with it. The less that person knows you, or what your presentation is about, the better.
WONDERING WHAT YOUR SCORE MAY INDICATE?
21-28 Fan-bloody-tastic!
14-21 Looking good, but you can do better
7-14 Uhmmm, you ain't at all ready
As we don't always have someone to rehearse our presentations with, a great way to use the Rubric is to record yourself (this is not Hollywood material so an iPhone video will do!), watching the video afterwards, and evaluating your presentation on your own. You'll be surprised by how different your perception of yourself is, in comparison to how you see yourself on video.
Related read: Webinar - Public Speaking and Stage Presence: How to wow?
It will be fairly easy to evaluate each trait! The mere exercise of reading the Presentation Rubric is an excellent study on presenting best practices.
If you're struggling with any particular trait, I suggest you take a look at our Academy Channel where we discuss how to improve each trait in detail!
It's not always easy to objectively assess our own speaking skills. So the next time you have a big presentation coming up, use this Rubric to put yourself to the test!
Need support for your presentation? Build awesome slides using our very own Slidebean .
Related video
Upcoming events
Beyond the pitch deck: master storytelling for closing rounds, crash course in financial modeling, popular articles.
Slidebean Helped USports Tackle A Complex Financial Model
AirBnb Pitch Deck: Teardown and Redesign (FREE Download)
Let’s move your company to the next stage 🚀
Ai pitch deck software, pitch deck services.
Financial Model Consulting for Startups 🚀
Raise money with our pitch deck writing and design service 🚀
The all-in-one pitch deck software 🚀
Preparing to pitch to investors from a VC Firm? This article includes examples and explanations from renowned Venture Capital Firms to guide you on crafting your pitch deck.
This article defines the meaning of a Startup Pitch Deck. We break down the key components of an effective pitch deck, why it's crucial for securing funding, and how to craft a narrative that resonates with venture capitalists. Whether you're creating your first deck or refining an existing one, this article provides actionable insights to help you capture investor interest and elevate your startup's pitch.
This is a functional model you can use to create your own formulas and project your potential business growth. Instructions on how to use it are on the front page.
Book a call with our sales team
In a hurry? Give us a call at
Rubric Best Practices, Examples, and Templates
A rubric is a scoring tool that identifies the different criteria relevant to an assignment, assessment, or learning outcome and states the possible levels of achievement in a specific, clear, and objective way. Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations.
Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently. Rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so that they can reflect on their performance and work on areas that need improvement.
How to Get Started
Best practices, moodle how-to guides.
Workshop Recording (Spring 2024)
Workshop Registration
Step 1: Analyze the assignment
The first step in the rubric creation process is to analyze the assignment or assessment for which you are creating a rubric. To do this, consider the following questions:
What is the purpose of the assignment and your feedback? What do you want students to demonstrate through the completion of this assignment (i.e. what are the learning objectives measured by it)? Is it a summative assessment, or will students use the feedback to create an improved product?
Does the assignment break down into different or smaller tasks? Are these tasks equally important as the main assignment?
What would an “excellent” assignment look like? An “acceptable” assignment? One that still needs major work?
How detailed do you want the feedback you give students to be? Do you want/need to give them a grade?
Step 2: Decide what kind of rubric you will use
Types of rubrics: holistic, analytic/descriptive, single-point
Holistic Rubric. A holistic rubric includes all the criteria (such as clarity, organization, mechanics, etc.) to be considered together and included in a single evaluation. With a holistic rubric, the rater or grader assigns a single score based on an overall judgment of the student’s work, using descriptions of each performance level to assign the score.
Advantages of holistic rubrics:
Can p lace an emphasis on what learners can demonstrate rather than what they cannot
Save grader time by minimizing the number of evaluations to be made for each student
Can be used consistently across raters, provided they have all been trained
Disadvantages of holistic rubrics:
Provide less specific feedback than analytic/descriptive rubrics
Can be difficult to choose a score when a student’s work is at varying levels across the criteria
Any weighting of c riteria cannot be indicated in the rubric
Analytic/Descriptive Rubric . An analytic or descriptive rubric often takes the form of a table with the criteria listed in the left column and with levels of performance listed across the top row. Each cell contains a description of what the specified criterion looks like at a given level of performance. Each of the criteria is scored individually.
Advantages of analytic rubrics:
Provide detailed feedback on areas of strength or weakness
Each criterion can be weighted to reflect its relative importance
Disadvantages of analytic rubrics:
More time-consuming to create and use than a holistic rubric
May not be used consistently across raters unless the cells are well defined
May result in giving less personalized feedback
Single-Point Rubric . A single-point rubric is breaks down the components of an assignment into different criteria, but instead of describing different levels of performance, only the “proficient” level is described. Feedback space is provided for instructors to give individualized comments to help students improve and/or show where they excelled beyond the proficiency descriptors.
Advantages of single-point rubrics:
Easier to create than an analytic/descriptive rubric
Perhaps more likely that students will read the descriptors
Areas of concern and excellence are open-ended
May removes a focus on the grade/points
May increase student creativity in project-based assignments
Disadvantage of analytic rubrics: Requires more work for instructors writing feedback
Step 3 (Optional): Look for templates and examples.
You might Google, “Rubric for persuasive essay at the college level” and see if there are any publicly available examples to start from. Ask your colleagues if they have used a rubric for a similar assignment. Some examples are also available at the end of this article. These rubrics can be a great starting point for you, but consider steps 3, 4, and 5 below to ensure that the rubric matches your assignment description, learning objectives and expectations.
Step 4: Define the assignment criteria
Make a list of the knowledge and skills are you measuring with the assignment/assessment Refer to your stated learning objectives, the assignment instructions, past examples of student work, etc. for help.
Helpful strategies for defining grading criteria:
Collaborate with co-instructors, teaching assistants, and other colleagues
Brainstorm and discuss with students
Can they be observed and measured?
Are they important and essential?
Are they distinct from other criteria?
Are they phrased in precise, unambiguous language?
Revise the criteria as needed
Consider whether some are more important than others, and how you will weight them.
Step 5: Design the rating scale
Most ratings scales include between 3 and 5 levels. Consider the following questions when designing your rating scale:
Given what students are able to demonstrate in this assignment/assessment, what are the possible levels of achievement?
How many levels would you like to include (more levels means more detailed descriptions)
Will you use numbers and/or descriptive labels for each level of performance? (for example 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and/or Exceeds expectations, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, Beginning, etc.)
Don’t use too many columns, and recognize that some criteria can have more columns that others . The rubric needs to be comprehensible and organized. Pick the right amount of columns so that the criteria flow logically and naturally across levels.
Step 6: Write descriptions for each level of the rating scale
Artificial Intelligence tools like Chat GPT have proven to be useful tools for creating a rubric. You will want to engineer your prompt that you provide the AI assistant to ensure you get what you want. For example, you might provide the assignment description, the criteria you feel are important, and the number of levels of performance you want in your prompt. Use the results as a starting point, and adjust the descriptions as needed.
Building a rubric from scratch
For a single-point rubric , describe what would be considered “proficient,” i.e. B-level work, and provide that description. You might also include suggestions for students outside of the actual rubric about how they might surpass proficient-level work.
For analytic and holistic rubrics , c reate statements of expected performance at each level of the rubric.
Consider what descriptor is appropriate for each criteria, e.g., presence vs absence, complete vs incomplete, many vs none, major vs minor, consistent vs inconsistent, always vs never. If you have an indicator described in one level, it will need to be described in each level.
You might start with the top/exemplary level. What does it look like when a student has achieved excellence for each/every criterion? Then, look at the “bottom” level. What does it look like when a student has not achieved the learning goals in any way? Then, complete the in-between levels.
For an analytic rubric , do this for each particular criterion of the rubric so that every cell in the table is filled. These descriptions help students understand your expectations and their performance in regard to those expectations.
Well-written descriptions:
Describe observable and measurable behavior
Use parallel language across the scale
Indicate the degree to which the standards are met
Step 7: Create your rubric
Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle. Rubric creators: Rubistar , iRubric
Step 8: Pilot-test your rubric
Prior to implementing your rubric on a live course, obtain feedback from:
Teacher assistants
Try out your new rubric on a sample of student work. After you pilot-test your rubric, analyze the results to consider its effectiveness and revise accordingly.
Limit the rubric to a single page for reading and grading ease
Use parallel language . Use similar language and syntax/wording from column to column. Make sure that the rubric can be easily read from left to right or vice versa.
Use student-friendly language . Make sure the language is learning-level appropriate. If you use academic language or concepts, you will need to teach those concepts.
Share and discuss the rubric with your students . Students should understand that the rubric is there to help them learn, reflect, and self-assess. If students use a rubric, they will understand the expectations and their relevance to learning.
Consider scalability and reusability of rubrics. Create rubric templates that you can alter as needed for multiple assignments.
Maximize the descriptiveness of your language. Avoid words like “good” and “excellent.” For example, instead of saying, “uses excellent sources,” you might describe what makes a resource excellent so that students will know. You might also consider reducing the reliance on quantity, such as a number of allowable misspelled words. Focus instead, for example, on how distracting any spelling errors are.
Example of an analytic rubric for a final paper
Above Average (4)
Sufficient (3)
Developing (2)
Needs improvement (1)
(Thesis supported by relevant information and ideas
The central purpose of the student work is clear and supporting ideas always are always well-focused. Details are relevant, enrich the work.
The central purpose of the student work is clear and ideas are almost always focused in a way that supports the thesis. Relevant details illustrate the author’s ideas.
The central purpose of the student work is identified. Ideas are mostly focused in a way that supports the thesis.
The purpose of the student work is not well-defined. A number of central ideas do not support the thesis. Thoughts appear disconnected.
(Sequencing of elements/ ideas)
Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which flows naturally and is engaging to the audience.
Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which is followed by the reader with little or no difficulty.
Information and ideas are presented in an order that the audience can mostly follow.
Information and ideas are poorly sequenced. The audience has difficulty following the thread of thought.
(Correctness of grammar and spelling)
Minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling.
The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Grammatical and/or spelling errors distract from the work.
The readability of the work is seriously hampered by spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Example of a holistic rubric for a final paper
The audience is able to easily identify the central message of the work and is engaged by the paper’s clear focus and relevant details. Information is presented logically and naturally. There are minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. : The audience is easily able to identify the focus of the student work which is supported by relevant ideas and supporting details. Information is presented in a logical manner that is easily followed. The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by errors. : The audience can identify the central purpose of the student work without little difficulty and supporting ideas are present and clear. The information is presented in an orderly fashion that can be followed with little difficulty. Grammatical and spelling errors distract from the work. : The audience cannot clearly or easily identify the central ideas or purpose of the student work. Information is presented in a disorganized fashion causing the audience to have difficulty following the author’s ideas. The readability of the work is seriously hampered by errors.
Single-Point Rubric
Advanced (evidence of exceeding standards)
Criteria described a proficient level
Concerns (things that need work)
Criteria #1: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance
Criteria #2: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance
Criteria #3: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance
Criteria #4: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance
90-100 points
80-90 points
<80 points
More examples:
Single Point Rubric Template ( variation )
Analytic Rubric Template make a copy to edit
A Rubric for Rubrics
Bank of Online Discussion Rubrics in different formats
Mathematical Presentations Descriptive Rubric
Math Proof Assessment Rubric
Kansas State Sample Rubrics
Design Single Point Rubric
Technology Tools: Rubrics in Moodle
Moodle Docs: Rubrics
Moodle Docs: Grading Guide (use for single-point rubrics)
Tools with rubrics (other than Moodle)
Google Assignments
Turnitin Assignments: Rubric or Grading Form
Other resources
DePaul University (n.d.). Rubrics .
Gonzalez, J. (2014). Know your terms: Holistic, Analytic, and Single-Point Rubrics . Cult of Pedagogy.
Goodrich, H. (1996). Understanding rubrics . Teaching for Authentic Student Performance, 54 (4), 14-17. Retrieved from
Miller, A. (2012). Tame the beast: tips for designing and using rubrics.
Ragupathi, K., Lee, A. (2020). Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education. In: Sanger, C., Gleason, N. (eds) Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Eberly Center
Teaching excellence & educational innovation, creating and using rubrics.
A rubric is a scoring tool that explicitly describes the instructor’s performance expectations for an assignment or piece of work. A rubric identifies:
criteria: the aspects of performance (e.g., argument, evidence, clarity) that will be assessed
descriptors: the characteristics associated with each dimension (e.g., argument is demonstrable and original, evidence is diverse and compelling)
performance levels: a rating scale that identifies students’ level of mastery within each criterion
Rubrics can be used to provide feedback to students on diverse types of assignments, from papers, projects, and oral presentations to artistic performances and group projects.
Benefitting from Rubrics
reduce the time spent grading by allowing instructors to refer to a substantive description without writing long comments
help instructors more clearly identify strengths and weaknesses across an entire class and adjust their instruction appropriately
help to ensure consistency across time and across graders
reduce the uncertainty which can accompany grading
discourage complaints about grades
understand instructors’ expectations and standards
use instructor feedback to improve their performance
monitor and assess their progress as they work towards clearly indicated goals
recognize their strengths and weaknesses and direct their efforts accordingly
Examples of Rubrics
Here we are providing a sample set of rubrics designed by faculty at Carnegie Mellon and other institutions. Although your particular field of study or type of assessment may not be represented, viewing a rubric that is designed for a similar assessment may give you ideas for the kinds of criteria, descriptions, and performance levels you use on your own rubric.
Example 1: Philosophy Paper This rubric was designed for student papers in a range of courses in philosophy (Carnegie Mellon).
Example 2: Psychology Assignment Short, concept application homework assignment in cognitive psychology (Carnegie Mellon).
Example 3: Anthropology Writing Assignments This rubric was designed for a series of short writing assignments in anthropology (Carnegie Mellon).
Example 4: History Research Paper . This rubric was designed for essays and research papers in history (Carnegie Mellon).
Example 1: Capstone Project in Design This rubric describes the components and standards of performance from the research phase to the final presentation for a senior capstone project in design (Carnegie Mellon).
Example 2: Engineering Design Project This rubric describes performance standards for three aspects of a team project: research and design, communication, and team work.
Oral Presentations
Example 1: Oral Exam This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing performance on an oral exam in an upper-division course in history (Carnegie Mellon).
Example 2: Oral Communication This rubric is adapted from Huba and Freed, 2000.
Example 3: Group Presentations This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing group presentations in history (Carnegie Mellon).
Class Participation/Contributions
Example 1: Discussion Class This rubric assesses the quality of student contributions to class discussions. This is appropriate for an undergraduate-level course (Carnegie Mellon).
Example 2: Advanced Seminar This rubric is designed for assessing discussion performance in an advanced undergraduate or graduate seminar.
See also " Examples and Tools " section of this site for more rubrics.
CONTACT US to talk with an Eberly colleague in person!
Faculty Support
Graduate Student Support
Canvas @ Carnegie Mellon
Quick Links
Utility Menu
de5f0c5840276572324fc6e2ece1a882
How to Use This Site
Core Competencies
Research Presentation Rubric
The format of research presentations can vary across and within disciplines. Use this rubric (PDF) to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. This resource focuses on research presentations but may be useful beyond.
Center for Excellence in Teaching
Home > Resources > Group presentation rubric
Got any suggestions?
We want to hear from you! Send us a message and help improve Slidesgo
Top searches
Trending searches
62 templates
49 templates
american history
85 templates
el salvador
34 templates
pink flowers
255 templates
22 templates
Evaluation Rubric
It seems that you like this template, evaluation rubric presentation, free google slides theme, powerpoint template, and canva presentation template.
Are you familiar with the concepts of "rubrics" in the academic sense? It's like a table where assignments (and the work behind them) are graded. This is a very simple description, so we think that it's best if you see it yourself. Check out this pack of evaluation rubrics! Completely editable and printable, these are ready to be used by educators or teachers who are also tired of using just white paper. A little bit of design makes the difference!
Features of this template
100% editable and easy to modify
26 different slides to impress your audience
Contains easy-to-edit graphics such as graphs, maps, tables, timelines and mockups
Includes 500+ icons and Flaticon’s extension for customizing your slides
Designed to be used in Google Slides, Canva, and Microsoft PowerPoint
A4 format optimized for printing
Includes information about fonts, colors, and credits of the resources used
How can I use the template?
Am I free to use the templates?
How to attribute?
Attribution required If you are a free user, you must attribute Slidesgo by keeping the slide where the credits appear. How to attribute?
Register for free and start downloading now
Related posts on our blog.
How to Add, Duplicate, Move, Delete or Hide Slides in Google Slides
The goal of this rubric is to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. • Self-assessment: Record yourself presenting your talk using your computer's pre-downloaded recording software or by using the coach in Microsoft PowerPoint. Then review your recording, fill in the rubric ...
PowerPoint Rubric
PowerPoint Rubric. Note cards indicate you accurately researched a variety of information sources, recorded and interpreted significant facts, meaningful graphics, accurate sounds and evaluated alternative points of view. Note cards show you recorded relevant information from multiple sources of information, evaluated and synthesized relevant ...
PDF Evaluation Rubric for Design of Presentation Slides
Evaluation Rubric for Design of Presentation Slides. Slides support speaker's message without being distracting; they are simple yet striking. Visuals used are best choices to communicate meaning and information. Good balance of text and graphics. Slides are too complex or busy, distracting audience from speaker's words.
PDF Oral Presentation Rubric
Oral Presentation Rubric 4—Excellent 3—Good 2—Fair 1—Needs Improvement Delivery • Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes • Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points • Consistent use of direct eye contact with ...
Presentation Rubric for a College Project
A typical presentation rubric includes a set of criteria and a scale for rating or scoring each criterion. The criteria are specific aspects or elements of the presentation that are considered essential for a successful presentation. The scale assigns a numerical value or descriptive level to each criterion, ranging from poor or unsatisfactory ...
Rubric Best Practices, Examples, and Templates
Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations. Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently. Rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so ...
PDF Student Presentation Scoring Guide and Rubric
0. Weight. Possible points. Introduction - Effectiveness of your brief initial discussion of the content, scope, and flow of your presentation. Your introduction makes perfectly clear the salient points and scope of your talk. A bit too brief (or too long), or missing an important item. Contains some relevant information but not nearly enough.
PDF Oral Presentation Rubric
the presentation. Title slide with Title slide meets name, class, and title Title slide missing required elements. requirements. Timing (7-8 minutes) Timing is more than 30 seconds below stated minimum or more than 30 seconds more than stated maximum. Time limit is effectively observed. Title: Oral-Pres-Rubric
Creating and Using Rubrics
Rubrics can be used to provide feedback to students on diverse types of assignments, from papers, projects, and oral presentations to artistic performances and group projects. Benefitting from Rubrics A carefully designed rubric can offer a number of benefits to instructors. Rubrics help instructors to:
Research Presentation Rubric
The format of research presentations can vary across and within disciplines. Use this rubric (PDF) to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. This resource focuses on research presentations but may be useful beyond.
PDF Sample Rubric for PowerPoint Presentation
Effectiveness. Presentation. 4. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is appropriate for this project. Font formats (e.g., 3. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background could have been better suited for the project.
PDF Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric, Formal Setting . PRESENTER: Non-verbal skills (Poise) 5 4 3 2 1 Comfort Relaxed, easy presentation with minimal hesitation Generally comfortable appearance, occasional hesitation Somewhat comfortable appearance, some hesitation Generally uncomfortable, difficulty with flow of presentation Completely
Presentation Rubric
Project Presentation Rubric Criteria 4 Advanced 3 Proficient 2 Improving 1 Warning/Failing Content Creative, engaging, and detailed presentation of all aspects of project (see Poetry Project Outline); makes creative and effective use of visual and audio aids Detailed ...
Oral Presentation Rubric
The rubric allows teachers to assess students in several key areas of oral presentation. Students are scored on a scale of 1-4 in three major areas. The first area is Delivery, which includes eye contact, and voice inflection. The second area, Content/Organization, scores students based on their knowledge and understanding of the topic being ...
PDF Rubric for Slide Show Presentation
presentation may be unclear, speaker may not speak loud enough or enunciate well; presentation does not show evidence of previous practice and/or speaker has not made adequate efforts to have good pronunciation an attempt to document sources is made, but it is inaccurate and/or incomplete 1 Comments and scores: Total Score Rubric for Slide Show ...
PDF Five Slide Presentation Rubric
The presentation was between 2:36 and 2:45 minutes OR between 2:24 and 2:15 minutes. The presentation was between 2:46 and 2:55 minutes OR between 2:14 and 2:05 minutes. The presentation was over 2:56 minutes or under 2:04 minutes. Number of Slides The presentation has five narrated slides. The presentation consists of four narrated slides.
PDF RUBRIC -Examples and Speaker Notes.ppt
A rubric is a tool for scoring an assignment that breaks the work into the component parts (which reflect objectives) The rubric provides a score (at a minimum) or a detailed description (ideally) of good or bad performance on each component part. R ub ri cs can be used to grad e st ud ent s. and combined for an overall score.
PDF Group Presentation Scoring Guide
entation RubricFraming LanguageThis rubric is intended to guide faculty in scoring a group presentation and allow instructors to score groups both as a unit and for individual stud. nt's skills and contributions. The rubric emphasizes that an effective group presentation requires coordinati.
Group presentation rubric
Group presentation rubric. This is a grading rubric an instructor uses to assess students' work on this type of assignment. It is a sample rubric that needs to be edited to reflect the specifics of a particular assignment. Students can self-assess using the rubric as a checklist before submitting their assignment. Download this file. You may ...
PDF Group Presentation Rubric (Unit 2 Lesson 3)
the slides. with visual appeal including white space, visuals, and minimal text for the most part. Color and animations are used appropriately. Theme (e.g., template) is evident in the presentation for the most part to produce a cohesive presentation and/or minor errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.
Google Slides Rubric
Presentation/Graphics: The slides are not easy to read. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There is little use of graphics or effects. 2-3 slides are easy to read. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects: 3-4 slides are attractive. Text is easy to read.
Evaluation Rubric
Features of this template. Contains easy-to-edit graphics such as graphs, maps, tables, timelines and mockups. Includes 500+ icons and Flaticon's extension for customizing your slides. Designed to be used in Google Slides, Canva, and Microsoft PowerPoint. Includes information about fonts, colors, and credits of the resources used.
Editable PowerPoint Presentation Rubric
The grid of the PowerPoint Presentation Rubric measures the focus areas that you choose to add on a four-point scale. It can be used for any subject and can be used as a template across a school to bring cohesion and consistency to the assessment process. You may choose to use this as a teacher assessment tool, or you can share the template ...
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The goal of this rubric is to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. • Self-assessment: Record yourself presenting your talk using your computer's pre-downloaded recording software or by using the coach in Microsoft PowerPoint. Then review your recording, fill in the rubric ...
PowerPoint Rubric. Note cards indicate you accurately researched a variety of information sources, recorded and interpreted significant facts, meaningful graphics, accurate sounds and evaluated alternative points of view. Note cards show you recorded relevant information from multiple sources of information, evaluated and synthesized relevant ...
Evaluation Rubric for Design of Presentation Slides. Slides support speaker's message without being distracting; they are simple yet striking. Visuals used are best choices to communicate meaning and information. Good balance of text and graphics. Slides are too complex or busy, distracting audience from speaker's words.
Oral Presentation Rubric 4—Excellent 3—Good 2—Fair 1—Needs Improvement Delivery • Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes • Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points • Consistent use of direct eye contact with ...
A typical presentation rubric includes a set of criteria and a scale for rating or scoring each criterion. The criteria are specific aspects or elements of the presentation that are considered essential for a successful presentation. The scale assigns a numerical value or descriptive level to each criterion, ranging from poor or unsatisfactory ...
Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations. Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently. Rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so ...
0. Weight. Possible points. Introduction - Effectiveness of your brief initial discussion of the content, scope, and flow of your presentation. Your introduction makes perfectly clear the salient points and scope of your talk. A bit too brief (or too long), or missing an important item. Contains some relevant information but not nearly enough.
the presentation. Title slide with Title slide meets name, class, and title Title slide missing required elements. requirements. Timing (7-8 minutes) Timing is more than 30 seconds below stated minimum or more than 30 seconds more than stated maximum. Time limit is effectively observed. Title: Oral-Pres-Rubric
Rubrics can be used to provide feedback to students on diverse types of assignments, from papers, projects, and oral presentations to artistic performances and group projects. Benefitting from Rubrics A carefully designed rubric can offer a number of benefits to instructors. Rubrics help instructors to:
The format of research presentations can vary across and within disciplines. Use this rubric (PDF) to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. This resource focuses on research presentations but may be useful beyond.
Effectiveness. Presentation. 4. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is appropriate for this project. Font formats (e.g., 3. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background could have been better suited for the project.
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric, Formal Setting . PRESENTER: Non-verbal skills (Poise) 5 4 3 2 1 Comfort Relaxed, easy presentation with minimal hesitation Generally comfortable appearance, occasional hesitation Somewhat comfortable appearance, some hesitation Generally uncomfortable, difficulty with flow of presentation Completely
Project Presentation Rubric Criteria 4 Advanced 3 Proficient 2 Improving 1 Warning/Failing Content Creative, engaging, and detailed presentation of all aspects of project (see Poetry Project Outline); makes creative and effective use of visual and audio aids Detailed ...
The rubric allows teachers to assess students in several key areas of oral presentation. Students are scored on a scale of 1-4 in three major areas. The first area is Delivery, which includes eye contact, and voice inflection. The second area, Content/Organization, scores students based on their knowledge and understanding of the topic being ...
presentation may be unclear, speaker may not speak loud enough or enunciate well; presentation does not show evidence of previous practice and/or speaker has not made adequate efforts to have good pronunciation an attempt to document sources is made, but it is inaccurate and/or incomplete 1 Comments and scores: Total Score Rubric for Slide Show ...
The presentation was between 2:36 and 2:45 minutes OR between 2:24 and 2:15 minutes. The presentation was between 2:46 and 2:55 minutes OR between 2:14 and 2:05 minutes. The presentation was over 2:56 minutes or under 2:04 minutes. Number of Slides The presentation has five narrated slides. The presentation consists of four narrated slides.
A rubric is a tool for scoring an assignment that breaks the work into the component parts (which reflect objectives) The rubric provides a score (at a minimum) or a detailed description (ideally) of good or bad performance on each component part. R ub ri cs can be used to grad e st ud ent s. and combined for an overall score.
entation RubricFraming LanguageThis rubric is intended to guide faculty in scoring a group presentation and allow instructors to score groups both as a unit and for individual stud. nt's skills and contributions. The rubric emphasizes that an effective group presentation requires coordinati.
Group presentation rubric. This is a grading rubric an instructor uses to assess students' work on this type of assignment. It is a sample rubric that needs to be edited to reflect the specifics of a particular assignment. Students can self-assess using the rubric as a checklist before submitting their assignment. Download this file. You may ...
the slides. with visual appeal including white space, visuals, and minimal text for the most part. Color and animations are used appropriately. Theme (e.g., template) is evident in the presentation for the most part to produce a cohesive presentation and/or minor errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.
Presentation/Graphics: The slides are not easy to read. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There is little use of graphics or effects. 2-3 slides are easy to read. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects: 3-4 slides are attractive. Text is easy to read.
Features of this template. Contains easy-to-edit graphics such as graphs, maps, tables, timelines and mockups. Includes 500+ icons and Flaticon's extension for customizing your slides. Designed to be used in Google Slides, Canva, and Microsoft PowerPoint. Includes information about fonts, colors, and credits of the resources used.
The grid of the PowerPoint Presentation Rubric measures the focus areas that you choose to add on a four-point scale. It can be used for any subject and can be used as a template across a school to bring cohesion and consistency to the assessment process. You may choose to use this as a teacher assessment tool, or you can share the template ...