• Career Advice

How to Avoid Failing Your Ph.D. Dissertation

By  Daniel Sokol

You have / 5 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in.

fail dissertation masters

Istock.com/erhui1979

I am a barrister in London who specializes in helping doctoral students who have failed their Ph.D.s. Few people will have had the dubious privilege of seeing as many unsuccessful Ph.D. dissertations and reading as many scathing reports by examination committees. Here are common reasons why students who submit their Ph.D.s fail, with advice on how to avoid such pitfalls. The lessons apply to the United States and the United Kingdom.

Lack of critical reflection. Probably the most common reason for failing a Ph.D. dissertation is a lack of critical analysis. A typical observation of the examination committee is, “The thesis is generally descriptive and a more analytical approach is required.”

For doctoral work, students must engage critically with the subject matter, not just set out what other scholars have said or done. If not, the thesis will not be original. It will not add anything of substance to the field and will fail.

Doctoral students should adopt a reflexive approach to their work. Why have I chosen this methodology? What are the flaws or limitations of this or that author’s argument? Can I make interesting comparisons between this and something else? Those who struggle with this aspect should ask their supervisors for advice on how to inject some analytic sophistication to their thesis.

Lack of coherence. Other common observations are of the type: “The argument running through the thesis needs to be more coherent” or “The thesis is poorly organized and put together without any apparent logic.”

The thesis should be seen as one coherent whole. It cannot be a series of self-contained chapters stitched together haphazardly. Students should spend considerable time at the outset of their dissertation thinking about structure, both at the macro level of the entire thesis and the micro level of the chapter. It is a good idea to look at other Ph.D. theses and monographs to get a sense of what constitutes a logical structure.

Poor presentation. The majority of failed Ph.D. dissertations are sloppily presented. They contain typos, grammatical mistakes, referencing errors and inconsistencies in presentation. Looking at some committee reports randomly, I note the following comments:

  • “The thesis is poorly written.”
  • “That previous section is long, badly written and lacks structure.”
  • “The author cannot formulate his thoughts or explain his reasons. It is very hard to understand a good part of the thesis.”
  • “Ensure that the standard of written English is consistent with the standard expected of a Ph.D. thesis.”
  • “The language used is simplistic and does not reflect the standard of writing expected at Ph.D. level.”

For committee members, who are paid a fixed and pitiful sum to examine the work, few things are as off-putting as a poorly written dissertation. Errors of language slow the reading speed and can frustrate or irritate committee members. At worst, they can lead them to miss or misinterpret an argument.

Students should consider using a professional proofreader to read the thesis, if permitted by the university’s regulations. But that still is no guarantee of an error-free thesis. Even after the proofreader has returned the manuscript, students should read and reread the work in its entirety.

When I was completing my Ph.D., I read my dissertation so often that the mere sight of it made me nauseous. Each time, I would spot a typo or tweak a sentence, removing a superfluous word or clarifying an ambiguous passage. My meticulous approach was rewarded when one committee member said in the oral examination that it was the best-written dissertation he had ever read. This was nothing to do with skill or an innate writing ability but tedious, repetitive revision.

Failure to make required changes. It is rare for students to fail to obtain their Ph.D. outright at the oral examination. Usually, the student is granted an opportunity to resubmit their dissertation after making corrections.

Students often submit their revised thesis together with a document explaining how they implemented the committee’s recommendations. And they often believe, wrongly, that this document is proof that they have incorporated the requisite changes and that they should be awarded a Ph.D.

In fact, the committee may feel that the changes do not go far enough or that they reveal further misunderstandings or deficiencies. Here are some real observations by dissertation committees:

  • “The added discussion section is confusing. The only thing that has improved is the attempt to provide a little more analysis of the experimental data.”
  • “The author has tried to address the issues identified by the committee, but there is little improvement in the thesis.”

In short, students who fail their Ph.D. dissertations make changes that are superficial or misconceived. Some revised theses end up worse than the original submission.

Students must incorporate changes in the way that the committee members had in mind. If what is required is unclear, students can usually seek clarification through their supervisors.

In the nine years I have spent helping Ph.D. students with their appeals, I have found that whatever the subject matter of the thesis, the above criticisms appear time and time again in committee reports. They are signs of a poor Ph.D.

Wise students should ask themselves these questions prior to submission of the dissertation:

  • Is the work sufficiently critical/analytical, or is it mainly descriptive?
  • Is it coherent and well structured?
  • Does the thesis look good and read well?
  • If a resubmission, have I made the changes that the examination committee had in mind?

Once students are satisfied that the answer to each question is yes, they should ask their supervisors the same questions.

A college campus glimpsed through bare tree branches.

State Grants Spread Thin

The FAFSA fiasco undermined projections for Minnesota’s grant program, leaving many students with hundreds or thousan

Share This Article

More from career advice.

Hand reaches down and picks a Black professional from a group of diverse people

How to Mitigate Bias and Hire the Best People

Patrick Arens shares an actionable approach to reviewing candidates that helps you make sure you select those most su

Group of both male and female professionals running out a door

4 Ways to Reduce Higher Ed’s Leadership Deficit

Without good people-management skills, we’ll perpetuate the workforce instability and turnover on our campuses, warns

Two groups of diverse professionals meet and greet, one wearing red, the other blue

Shared Governance in Tumultuous Times

As the tradition is strongly tested, a faculty senate leader, Stephen J. Silvia, and a former provost, Scott A.

  • Become a Member
  • Sign up for Newsletters
  • Learning & Assessment
  • Diversity & Equity
  • Career Development
  • Labor & Unionization
  • Shared Governance
  • Academic Freedom
  • Books & Publishing
  • Financial Aid
  • Residential Life
  • Free Speech
  • Physical & Mental Health
  • Race & Ethnicity
  • Sex & Gender
  • Socioeconomics
  • Traditional-Age
  • Adult & Post-Traditional
  • Teaching & Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Digital Publishing
  • Data Analytics
  • Administrative Tech
  • Alternative Credentials
  • Financial Health
  • Cost-Cutting
  • Revenue Strategies
  • Academic Programs
  • Physical Campuses
  • Mergers & Collaboration
  • Fundraising
  • Research Universities
  • Regional Public Universities
  • Community Colleges
  • Private Nonprofit Colleges
  • Minority-Serving Institutions
  • Religious Colleges
  • Women's Colleges
  • Specialized Colleges
  • For-Profit Colleges
  • Executive Leadership
  • Trustees & Regents
  • State Oversight
  • Accreditation
  • Politics & Elections
  • Supreme Court
  • Student Aid Policy
  • Science & Research Policy
  • State Policy
  • Colleges & Localities
  • Employee Satisfaction
  • Remote & Flexible Work
  • Staff Issues
  • Study Abroad
  • International Students in U.S.
  • U.S. Colleges in the World
  • Intellectual Affairs
  • Seeking a Faculty Job
  • Advancing in the Faculty
  • Seeking an Administrative Job
  • Advancing as an Administrator
  • Beyond Transfer
  • Call to Action
  • Confessions of a Community College Dean
  • Higher Ed Gamma
  • Higher Ed Policy
  • Just Explain It to Me!
  • Just Visiting
  • Law, Policy—and IT?
  • Leadership & StratEDgy
  • Leadership in Higher Education
  • Learning Innovation
  • Online: Trending Now
  • Resident Scholar
  • University of Venus
  • Student Voice
  • Academic Life
  • Health & Wellness
  • The College Experience
  • Life After College
  • Academic Minute
  • Weekly Wisdom
  • Reports & Data
  • Quick Takes
  • Advertising & Marketing
  • Consulting Services
  • Data & Insights
  • Hiring & Jobs
  • Event Partnerships

4 /5 Articles remaining this month.

Sign up for a free account or log in.

  • Sign Up, It’s FREE

Think Student

What Happens if You Fail Your Dissertation?

In University by Think Student Editor February 9, 2023 Leave a Comment

A dissertation module is one of the key things that defines the step up from secondary school to university. It’s one of the biggest pieces of writing you’ll do for your degree, in terms of research and word count. It’s no mistake to think that a lot rests on a good dissertation. However, it’s always good to be prepared for the worst-case scenario. You’ve probably already asked the question – what actually happens if you do fail?

If you fail your dissertation for the first time at any degree level, you will be allowed one resubmission, which is usually capped at the pass mark. However, if you fail your dissertation resubmission, there are different consequences. If you fail your undergraduate dissertation, you can still graduate as long as you have enough credits, although this may be with an ordinary degree. However, if you fail your master’s dissertation or PhD thesis resubmission, you will not be allowed to graduate.

The topic of failure is quite daunting for most students. Not to worry! This article is here to help you understand failure criteria for a dissertation, and what happens in the event of failure.

Table of Contents

Is it possible to fail your dissertation?

Like with modules of your university course, unfortunately it is very much possible to fail your dissertation . Although this sounds daunting, don’t worry too much! Dissertations are not designed for you to fail.

The grading systems for university modules and dissertations are very similar . Across most universities, the pass mark for a dissertation is 40% or 50%. For example, check out this guide by Royal Holloway University, London to learn more about their dissertation grading.

This means that while it is certainly possible to fail your dissertation, it is unlikely that you actually will . However, in the event that you do fail your dissertation for whatever reason, don’t panic. Your university will usually let you resit your dissertation .

Keep in mind you’ll only be able to resit your dissertation once , so try your hardest to achieve the grade you want. For all the details you’ll need about a dissertation, I’d definitely recommend reading this Think Student article.

In summary, while it is possible to fail a dissertation (just like any other university module), a dissertation only requires a pass mark of 40%. Although a dissertation is different to a module, it is still pretty difficult to fail.

In the event you do fail your dissertation, don’t be too hard on yourself . Keep reading further to find out what happens if you fail your resit dissertation.

How bad does a dissertation need to be to fail?

To understand how “bad” a dissertation has to be to fail, you need to know what examiners are looking for.

Your university will have published the marking criteria for dissertations . These will normally feature comments on the key areas to earn marks in. As an example, check out the University of Edinburgh’s dissertation criteria here .

Therefore, if you failed your dissertation, it isn’t necessarily because you’re “bad at researching and writing”. To fail, it has to be the case that you didn’t meet the criteria to achieve a passing mark. It’s important to keep your confidence, so that you can do better when you resit.

If you haven’t written your dissertation yet, I’d definitely recommend looking through your university’s marking criteria. Similarly , your tutor will want to help you as much as possible, so you can ask them for advice if you’re really struggling .

If you’re seeking advice on how to write a dissertation, you should check out this Think Student article.

Can you graduate without passing your dissertation?

For an undergraduate degree, you can still graduate as long as you have enough credits to pass the other modules .

However , if your degree is a BSc or BA with Honours, if you fail your dissertation and the resit dissertation, you will graduate with an ordinary degree . You can read more about what an ordinary degree is in this Think Student article.

If you fail your first dissertation attempt, but pass your resit undergraduate dissertation, you will still pass with whatever class of degree you earned.

However, the rule is slightly different for master’s dissertations and a PhD thesis. These rules also depend on the university you attend .

At all universities, you are allowed one resit of coursework (dissertation is a form of coursework, as it is not a timed exam), even for a master’s degree and a PhD. However, if you fail your resit dissertation for your master’s degree, you cannot be awarded a master’s degree.

In the case of a PhD, you will not be able to graduate with a failed resit thesis . I’ll explain this in more detail later in the article, so keep reading!

What happens if you fail your master’s dissertation?

Failing your master’s dissertation for the first time isn’t ideal, but it isn’t the end of the world. You’re allowed a resit, which if you pass, means you can still graduate with a master’s degree.

However, a failure is a lot more serious if you fail your dissertation a second time . Failing a resit dissertation at master’s degree-level means you cannot graduate with a master’s degree.

This doesn’t mean you can’t be awarded anything at all for your effort. For example, the this page by the University of Nottingham states that if your dissertation is not passable but still “adequate”, you may still be awarded a diploma .

What happens if you fail your PhD thesis?

Like with an undergraduate or master’s degree, you’re allowed to resubmit your thesis once only . Given that you pass the resubmission, you’ll still be on track to graduate with a PhD.

Failing a PhD thesis resubmission means you cannot graduate. The pass mark for a PhD thesis is usually around 60 , such as at the University of Cambridge, which you can learn more about on their website, here .

In most cases, a PhD thesis will account for around 50% of the degree . Looking at it this way, it makes sense that if you failed half of your degree, you wouldn’t be able to graduate. A PhD is a research-based degree, and the thesis proves you have good research skills.

If you’d like to know more about how a PhD is graded, I’d recommend this Think Student article.

How often do students fail their dissertation?

As I established earlier, it’s pretty hard to fail your undergraduate dissertation module . It’s also quite hard to fail a master’s dissertation or a PhD thesis given the pass mark.

According to this article by The Healthy Journal, up to 50% of PhD students will not finish their thesis or graduate . This statistic sounds quite extreme, but keep in mind that not many people choose to complete a PhD because of the amount of time and money it takes.

If you really are concerned about failing your dissertation, speak to your tutor . They will have been in your position and will know how to help. Don’t struggle on your own!

guest

DP Logo

Dissertation Services

  • Dissertation Writing Service
  • Dissertation Assistance Service
  • Dissertation Consulting Service
  • Buy Dissertation
  • Dissertation Abstract Writing Services
  • Dissertation Formatting Service
  • Buy Dissertation Methodology
  • Dissertation Case Study Service
  • Pay For Dissertation
  • Dissertation Chapter Writing Services
  • Dissertation Conclusion Services
  • Dissertation Data Analysis Services
  • Dissertation Discussion Writing Services
  • Dissertation Introduction Writing Service
  • Dissertation Outline Service
  • Online Dissertation Help
  • Write My Dissertation
  • Do My Dissertation
  • Help With Thesis Writing Service
  • Dissertation Writing England
  • Dissertation Writing Service London
  • Dissertation Writing Northern Ireland
  • Dissertation Writing Scotland
  • Dissertation Writing Wales
  • Personal Statement Writing Service

Dissertation Subjects

  • Marketing Dissertation
  • Digital Marketing Dissertation
  • Law Dissertation Help
  • Economics Dissertation
  • Accounting Dissertation
  • Business Management Dissertation
  • Nursing Dissertation
  • Psychology Dissertation
  • Social Media Marketing Dissertation
  • English Literature Dissertation Help
  • Finance Dissertation
  • History Dissertation
  • HRM Dissertation
  • IT Dissertation
  • Linguistics Dissertation Help
  • Supply Chain Management Dissertation Help
  • Health And Social Care Dissertation

Dissertation Levels

  • Buy Master Dissertation
  • MBA Dissertation Writing Service
  • Buy PhD Dissertation
  • Masters Dissertation Proposal Help
  • MBA Dissertation Proposal Help
  • PhD Data Collection Services
  • PhD Dissertation Proposal Help
  • PhD Qualitative Data Analysis Services
  • Master Thesis Help
  • PhD Thesis Writing Help
  • PhD Dissertation Editing
  • Finance Dissertation Editing
  • Digital Marketing Dissertation Editing
  • Accounting Dissertation Editing
  • Sociology Dissertation Editing
  • English Literature Dissertation Editing
  • Economics Dissertation Editing
  • Linguistics Dissertation Editing
  • Business Management Dissertation Editing
  • Psychology Dissertation Editing
  • Marketing Dissertation Editing
  • Academic Poster Designing Services
  • Dissertation PowerPoint Presentation Service
  • Dissertation Presentation Writing Services
  • Literature Review Writing Service
  • Primary Data Collection Service
  • Qualitative Data Dissertation Services
  • Research Data Collection Service
  • Secondary Data Collection Help
  • DISSERTATION SERVICES
  • DISSERTATION SUBJECTS
  • DISSERTATION LEVELS
  • Buy MBA Dissertation
  • PhD Dissertation Editing Services

Hire a Writer

Get an expert writer for your academic paper

Check Samples

Take a look at samples for quality assurance

Dissertation Topics

Free customised dissertation topics for your assistance

  • What Happens If You Fail…
  • Accounting Dissertation Topics (8)
  • Banking & Finance Dissertation Topics (10)
  • Business Management Dissertation Topics (35)
  • Economic Dissertation Topics (1)
  • Education Dissertation Topics (12)
  • Engineering Dissertation Topics (9)
  • English Literature Dissertation Topics (3)
  • HRM Dissertation Topics (3)
  • Law Dissertation Topics (13)
  • Marketing Dissertation Topics (9)
  • Medical Dissertation Topics (7)
  • Nursing Dissertation Topics (10)
  • Other Topics (10)
  • Supply Chain Dissertation Topics (2)
  • Biomedical Science (1)
  • Business Management Research Topics (1)
  • Computer Science Research Topics (1)
  • Criminology Research Topics (1)
  • Economics Research Topics (1)
  • Google Scholar Research Topics (1)
  • HR Research Topics (1)
  • Law Research Topics (1)
  • Management Research Topics (1)
  • Marketing Research Topics (1)
  • MBA Research Topics (1)
  • Medical Research Topics (1)
  • How To (22)

Get a native to improve your language & writing

Enjoy quality dissertation help on any topic

Qualitative & Quantitative data analysis

What Happens If You Fail Your Dissertation?

If you are on the brink of failure over your final year research, then don’t worry, you are not alone. It is no doubt that every year, several students go through a failing dissertation which is a traumatizing experience for anyone, thinking what will happen if you fail your dissertation?

Opportunity or Exhaustive?

It is a fact that the degree will not be awarded with a failed dissertation, no matter which academic program a student is enrolled in. The nightmares of ‘what happens if I fail my dissertation’ are completely fair.

What Happens If you Fail your Dissertation?

When it comes to Ph.D., the dissertation failure rate is about 40% to 50% which increases the thoughts of what happens if you fail dissertation. Some don’t even make it to their final defense and are rejected over their proposal presentation. And gets in the list of fail dissertation UK professors manage.

With a figure like this of Ph.D. students who are comparatively professionals at what they do, think about the failed undergraduate dissertation rates that students might go through every year. In fact, before submission they are surrounded with one question; how bad does a dissertation have to be to fail? and try to conquer it.

The question arises, are facing such results an opportunity or exhaustive? That depends upon the student and how they perceive it. Many get motivated by their failures while others do breakdown and cry thinking I ‘failed my dissertation’. To have a say, it should be taken no less than an opportunity to improve a failing dissertation.

How “Dissertation Proposal” Can Help You!

Our top dissertation writing experts are waiting 24/7 to assist you with your university project, from critical literature reviews to a complete masters dissertation.

So What’s Next?

“What happens if I fail my dissertation?” or “what happens if you don’t submit your dissertation” is a common question. Students with this unfortunate situation will be given another opportunity to re-submit their dissertation within a given deadline.

Strictly keeping in mind, the marks will be kept to a minimum passing line during the resubmission, which is an academic probatory method practiced for certain reasons. Anyhow, it is somewhat a good news, better than wondering wondering ‘what happens if you fail your undergraduate dissertation?’ A passing grade would even work.

What Happen If I Failed in My Dissertation on Second Attempt?

If the second attempt turns out to be unsuccessful, then you can re-submit your dissertation the next semester of your university. Doesn’t need to brag ‘I failed my dissertation’

Can you resit a dissertation again after the second attempt? That depends upon the regulation that the university has set forth. However, such situations are rare and are less likely to occur but might be possible to some extent when you failed undergraduate dissertation.

How to Avoid Possible Dissertation Failure?

Before starting your  dissertation writing  and possibly avoid the chance of saying: “I failed my dissertation”, it is necessary to keep certain practices in check.

Keep communication with your supervisors regular

The dissertation supervisor is the key to achieving a passing grade. Every help should be taken from the supervisors as they have the academic insider of all the do’s and don’t. Even ask what happens if you fail dissertation UK standard has rejected. This is a student’s guide to achieve perfection, let alone just passing.

Look for immediate help from other sources

Look for immediate help to overcome minor research issues. Avoid delaying as it might become last-minute trouble to fix a failed dissertation (what every student thinks). Yet again, it is not wise to disturb your supervisor over and over again so don’t be shy to seek help from your friends, or anyone professional, if you think you are on the edge to fail dissertation this year.

Have a Maintained Flow

Can you fail a dissertation? Failure is possible when it comes to not proposing a proper presentation. This may be caused due to not having a strong enough literature review, research methods, variables, or the research statement itself. Furthermore, there has to be a connection from one chapter to another. Without a connection, the judging panel might find it difficult to understand which can lead to rejection and failing a dissertation might become your fate.

The submission of hard copy needs to be structured properly with relevant and up-to-date citations used within the plagiarism percentage criteria. In this case, ‘can you resit a dissertation’ thoughts becomes void.

This is a glimpse of how bad does a dissertation have to be to fail, where following these guidelines are just the basics for passing on the borderline and resist ‘what happens if you fail a  dissertation’ thoughts.

Keeping in Mind!

These are the basic understanding as to what happens if you fail your dissertation on any academic level. But keep in mind, you can always appeal to your university for re-checking any unfair corrections that might have occurred in your failed masters dissertation or so. Universities around the world do facilitate such procedures where you can provide strong evidence to avoid such failure.

Consult Our Writers to Discuss Your Needs

View different varieties of dissertation topics and samples on multiple subjects for every educational level

Some of the common questions asked by students regarding this matter are:

You will need to submit a new application in the next semester for your dissertation and repeat the research credit hours all over again from scratch.

That varies from university to university and the regulations they might have set forth. However, it is required to complete the full credit hours of the final dissertation again.

Not much compared to the dissertation failure rate of Ph.D. students . The key is to follow all the advice of your supervisor as they usually carry most of the dissertation mark weightage.

To understand the procedure and to know what happens if you fail your dissertation on the first attempt, you will generally be given another opportunity to resubmit your dissertation on another given deadline.

To some extent, yes. It possible; judging by the dissertation failure rate which exists. However, there could be numerous reasons for failing your dissertation. This possibility exists and many students tend to go through the horror thoughts of ‘what if I fail my dissertation’ and it is completely fair to fear.

help for assessment

  • Customer Reviews
  • Extended Essays
  • IB Internal Assessment
  • Theory of Knowledge
  • Literature Review
  • Dissertations
  • Essay Writing
  • Research Writing
  • Assignment Help
  • Capstone Projects
  • College Application
  • Online Class

What EXACTLY Happens if You Fail Your Dissertation Project?

Author Image

by  Antony W

June 28, 2024

fail dissertation

Failing a dissertation is one of the most difficult and painful experiences for many students. After months of research and writing, the last thing you want is to get failing marks. So what happens if you fail a dissertation?

If you fail your dissertation project, your institution will give you another chance to redo the work and re-submit it based on an agreed date. However, you institution will cap the marks for a resubmitted dissertation at a pass level.

Notably, it’s highly unlikely for students to fail their dissertations straight outright. More often than not, the possibility of failure often arises from a student’s negligence, which it’s easy to avoid with proper planning.

Just because you’ve failed a dissertation, if you have, doesn’t mean it’s the end of life. You still get the chance to change your marks from a fail to a pass.

In this guide, you’ll learn everything about failed dissertation, including the options you have to redeem yourself from the failing marks to the bare pass level.

Let’s get started.

What Does it Mean to Fail a Dissertation?

To fail a dissertation paper means you have scored below the institution’s cut mark, which is often a 40. The majority of pupils can beat the cut-off points by as little as one point, which means it’s often unlikely that one would intentionally fail the project.

You cannot graduate if you fail a dissertation. In fact, graduating with a failed grade would be tantamount to celebrating your failure. Most colleges permit re-sits, after which students may graduate if they get the required grade.

As a result, if you want to be included on the graduation list, you should work hard enough to make sure you don’t fail your dissertation. You have to aim to get a 40, although it’s best to aim higher because the set minimum marks don’t necessarily have to be the limit.

Why Do Students Fail Their Dissertations?

Nothing is as frustrating as spending months on a dissertation only to fail the assignment in the end. The question is, “why do students get failing marks in the first place”?

1. Failure to Dedicate Time to the Project

It’s possible to get failing marks for a dissertation because of failing to dedicate enough time to do the work.

The majority of college and university students are preoccupied with other aspects of their lives, such as employment or family. These factors may reduce the amount of time available for study, resulting in failure.

2. Plagiarism: Students Copying Other Research Projects as their Own

Another possible cause of failure is plagiarism. If your institution establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that you’ve copied another person’s work and use it as your own, you stand a 100% chance to fail the dissertation project.

From what we understand, plagiarism is usually the first thing that many institutions look at when students submit their dissertation projects.

3. Lack of Assistance from Project Supervisor

It’s possible for a student fail a dissertation if they don’t get enough help from your supervisor. Because the majority of instructors are overworked, finding time for their students becomes a nightmare. As a result, the student doesn’t get the help they need to stay on the right track, particularly for a technical course.

How Bad Does a Dissertation Project has to be to Fail?

It’s highly unlikely that you’ll fail a dissertation project. A dissertation isn’t some assignment that you have to submit in two hours or within two weeks . You have more than 6 months to complete the project, which is enough to research, outline, write, proofread, and submit the assignment.

You’ll make mistakes as you work on the assignment, but the errors should be easy to fix provided you’re on schedule. Moreover, you will have your work evaluated on a chapter-by-chapter basis. So, by the time you get to the conclusion, your supervisor will have mentioned the errors you need to fix to make your dissertation stand out. 

While the chances of failing the dissertation are extremely low, some students still fail because their dissertations are extremely bad. A dissertation is bad if:

  • There are parts of the final document missing. For example, you risk failing if the work doesn’t have an abstract or study techniques.
  • The document doesn’t have a formally accepted and approved layout. Failure to adhere to the proper format may result in your work getting failing marks. For example, the conclusion cannot come before results and findings.
  • You omit technical words or adequate research procedures.

These examples demonstrate a lack of understanding, which is the dissertation’s central theme.

What to Do if You Fail a Dissertation

Is it possible to redo the dissertation project the same way you would other types of assignments in college or university?

Well, you have the option to redo your dissertation if you don’t get a 40, but keep in mind that your institution will reduce the pass mark to a minimum. You won’t get anything close to a grade B, but at least you will get passing marks.

Keep in mind that you only have one last chance to redo the dissertation project. If you fail a second time, your institution will declare that you’ve failed completely. So if you failed your dissertation the first time, take the second attempt as an opportunity to give the project the most attention possible because you cannot afford to fail twice. 

How Not to Fail a Dissertation

Here’s how not to fail a dissertation project:

  • Review your work before to submission. This will make it easy for you to identify mistakes, strange formatting, or an incorrect structure. Verify that each section is where it should be and that no component is missing.
  • Run the work through a plagiarism checker. Additionally, examine your references and sources to avoid plagiarism fines.
  • Consult your supervisor: When you’re through writing a section, double-check that what you’ve written is consistent with the paper’s overall objective. If you encounter any difficulties, address them immediately before they grow too large for you to handle.

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

Main navigation

  • Graduate Students
  • Faculty & Staff
  • General requirements
  • Preparation of a thesis
  • Initial Thesis Submission
  • Thesis examiners
  • Evaluation of written thesis
  • Pre-August 2022 Revise and Resubmit process
  • Doctoral oral defence
  • Final Thesis Submission
  • Thesis Writing and Support Resources
  • Letters of Completion/PGWP

Thesis Examination Failures

If one or both of the examiners give the thesis an outcome of 'not passed' on the examination report, a Master’s student will not graduate and a Doctoral candidate will not proceed to the oral defence. However, the student has the option to revise and resubmit a failed thesis. When the examiner’s report is received by the Thesis Office and after the results are shared with the student, the transcript will indicate ‘Thesis Requires Revision’.

In cases where plagiarism in the thesis is alleged, the thesis examination process does not proceed any further and the case is investigated through University disciplinary processes.

Revise and resubmit process in myThesis (August 2022-present)

*For students who started the Revise and Resubmit process outside myThesis, prior to August 2022, see this webpage .

As of August 2022, the revise and resubmit process for students who have not passed the thesis examination takes place in myThesis. The process is highlighted in the table below:

When one or both examiners return an evaluation of “Not Passed”, the primary supervisor will receive a notification via myThesis asking them to review the results in myThesis. They are advised to release the results to the student in myThesis within two days.

When the results are released to the student, it is at this point that the transcript will reflect “Thesis Requires Revision” for the current term.

The student is advised at this point to choose among the following (1) Revise and resubmit; (2) Hearing Committee (for bias, error, or misrepresentation). They have to make the decision in myThesis. The supervisor will be notified of the decision.

If there is no response from the student within six weeks of the date of the notification, they will be withdrawn from the University. Their transcript will indicate ‘Thesis Revision – Not Passed’.

When the student submits their decision to revise their thesis, the supervisor(s) will receive a myThesis notification asking them to confirm that they will maintain supervisory oversight for the revision.

The supervisor(s) has/have responded ‘Yes’ to the student decision to revise & resubmit.

The student should proceed to working on the revisions. The revised thesis must be submitted to GPS no later than 1 year from the student’s decision to revise and resubmit. The due date to submit the revisions is indicated in myThesis.

Students must remain registered at McGill throughout this time.

If the student does not submit the revised thesis by the deadline, the thesis will be deemed to have failed and the student will be withdrawn from the university. Their transcript will indicate ‘Thesis Revision – Not Passed’.

When it is time to submit the thesis, the student can log into myThesis and upload the following documents:

 

The supervisor and GPD will then receive notifications to approve the revised submission in myThesis.

The supervisor(s) has/have approved the revised thesis submission.

The GPD has approved the revised thesis submission.

GPS has received and approved the revised thesis submission.

The revised thesis package is sent to the examiner who failed the original thesis. No contact between the Unit or student and the examiner is permitted.

If the original examiner is not willing or available to serve, GPS will contact the Unit and secure another examiner. This new examiner will be provided with the original thesis and report that did not pass the thesis. They will be asked to determine whether the revised thesis has addressed the issues raised by the original examiner’s report and has met the requirements for the degree.

Once the thesis has passed, the student can submit their final or proceed to an oral defence, depending on their level of study.

Should the examiner not pass the revised thesis, the student will be withdrawn from the University unless they believe there is bias, error, or serious misrepresentation on the part of the examiner (see below).

Hearing Committee (Bias, Error, or Misrepresentation)

Revised in 2012 and 2018. Start of revision.

If a thesis has not been passed and the student feels that this judgment is not based on the academic or scholarly quality of the thesis itself, but rather is determined by bias, error, or serious misrepresentation on the part of the examiner, the student may submit to the Dean of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies a written request for a new examiner for the thesis, documenting the bias, error, or serious misrepresentation. This request must be made within six weeks of the notification that the thesis has not passed, and may be accompanied by a letter of support from the supervisor and/or Unit.

To consider the request, the Dean will convene (and chair) a Hearing Committee, composed of two (2) standing members of the Council of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (C.G.P.S) and an appointed member of the student’s Faculty. This Committee will review the request at a hearing to which the student will be invited in order to present their case.*** The Committee will render a decision (in the absence of the student) as to whether bias, error or serious misrepresentation has been proven. The decision and the reasons behind it will be communicated in writing to the student by the Dean of Graduate & Postdoctoral Studies within one week of the Committee hearing.

If the request for a new examiner is approved by the Committee, the examination will be considered void; the student and supervisor with the approval of the Unit must identify and contact a new examiner (and submit a new Nomination of Examiners Form to GPS). The thesis may not be revised prior to submission of the new examiner.

If the request for a new examiner is not approved by the Committee, and this is the first time that the thesis had been evaluated, the student has the right to Revise and Resubmit under the normal procedures. If the revised thesis also fails to pass examination, the thesis will be judged as not fulfilling the requirements for the degree and the student will be withdrawn from the University and their transcript will indicate ‘Thesis Revision – Not Passed’.

Revised and resubmitted thesis : If bias, error, or serious misrepresentation is first alleged as a result of the examination of a revised thesis (i.e. a thesis that did not pass the first examination and was subsequently revised and resubmitted), the Hearing Committee process described above will be followed. If the allegation is upheld, a new examiner will be secured as described above. If the allegation is not upheld, no further revisions will be considered; the student will be withdrawn from the University and their transcript will indicate ‘Thesis Revision – Not Passed’.

Revised in 2012 and 2018. End of revision.

*Unit refers to a department, a division, a school, an institute, or a Faculty/University-wide program.

**Head refers to chair of the Academic Unit* or delegate (such as Graduate Program Director/Associate Director). Names of delegate(s) should be submitted to the Director, Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs.

*** The student may bring an advisor from the university community to the hearing (who must not be paid for their services.)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License . Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, McGill University .

Department and University Information

Graduate and postdoctoral studies.

X

Academic Manual

  • 9. Consequences of Failure

Menu

Section 9: Consequences of Failure

Published for 2023-24

The Consequences of Failure regulations cover the provisions for students who do not meet the Progression and Award Requirements, where there are no Extenuating Circumstances material to that failure. Students who are ill or have other valid Extenuating Circumstances should refer to for details of the support available.

9.1 Overarching Principles

:    A student who does not meet the Progression and Award Requirements at the first attempt should be reassessed in the failed module(s).
:    A student who does not meet the Progression and Award Requirements at the second attempt must not be reassessed.

9.2 Failure at the First Attempt

1.A student who does not meet the Progression and Award Requirements at the first attempt should be reassessed in the failed module(s) unless they:
 a)Are eligible for the award of the intended qualification, or
 b)Are eligible for Condonement ( ), or
 c)Have failed an Additional/ Extra-Mural Study Abroad or Placement Year (see paragraph 7 below), or
 d)Have been awarded a qualification, or
 e)Have failed to meet specific, essential Professional, Statutory or Regulatory Body requirements as approved by UCL Education Committee or its nominee and recorded in the Portico Progression and Award Rules Tool, or
 f)Have been excluded from UCL on the grounds of academic insufficiency, or
 g)Have been excluded from UCL as a result of academic or personal misconduct.
2.Where a student fails up to and including 60 taught credits in any one academic session reassessment must take the form of a  .
3.Where a student fails more than 60 taught credits in any one academic session, reassessment should take the form of a  . Where a  is considered to be impossible, the Board of Examiners may offer the student the opportunity to take the failed assessments as 
4.Where a student requires Deferred Assessment and Reassessment, the volume of credits for the Deferred Assessment should not be taken into consideration in determining whether a student is required to Resit or Repeat.
5.Where a student fails a Dissertation/ Research Project, reassessment should take the form of a   unless the Board of Examiners agrees that, in its academic judgement, the extent of failure is such that additional supervision is needed to retrieve that failure. Such students may be required to   the Dissertation/ Research Project with tuition and fees.
6.A student who fails an Additional/ Extra-Mural Study Abroad or Placement Year must not be reassessed but may be permitted to transfer to an equivalent programme without a Study Abroad or Placement requirement.
7.A student must not be reassessed in a Passed or Condoned module.
8.A student must not be permitted to make corrections to a piece of work after the submission deadline or examination date. If work is to be submitted for publication, a student must only be permitted to make corrections once the Board of Examiners has made a decision about Progression and Award.
9.Reassessment must be completed within the next two academic sessions (e.g. if the student first enrols on the module in 2020-21 they must complete the assessment by the end of 2022-23). Where a module is substituted, students have two academic sessions from when they first enrol on the substituted module.
10.This period of two academic sessions may be extended at the discretion of UCL Education Services on behalf of the Vice-Provost (Education & Student Experience). Applications must be made via the Faculty Tutor.

9.3 Failure at the Second Attempt

1.A student who does not meet the Progression and Award Requirements at the second attempt must leave the programme, and must not be permitted to re-enrol on a failed programme or module.
2.A student may be eligible for one of the following, depending on their programme of study: 
 a)The award of a qualification with a different field of study, or
 b)Transfer to an alternative programme, or
 c)An Interim Qualification ( ).

9.4 Resitting a Module

1.A   is a second attempt at an assessment without any additional tuition and with marks capped at the Pass Mark (see ).
 
2.Resits should be scheduled as follows:
 

Late Summer Assessment Period.

Late Summer Assessment Period or within three months of the first attempt.

Within three months of the first attempt.

By 31 January of the following academic session.

By 30 April of the following academic session.

3.Departments/ Divisions running Resits and Deferrals outside of the Late Summer Assessment Period must:
 a)Ensure that students have an adequate amount of time in which to revise or complete the work, and
 b)Manage the assessment including the operation of unseen written examinations (students cannot be timetabled into the main UCL LSA Examination Timetable), and
 c)Ensure that there are no timetabling clashes, especially for students external to the Teaching Department/ Division, and
 d)Ensure that marks are entered by the deadlines published by Student and Registry Services each year so that students can formally progress to any subsequent years of study, and
 e)Ensure that the award of a student’s degree is not delayed unreasonably, and
 f)Ensure that all students registered on the module are aware of the reassessment dates as early as possible.
4.Progressing students should not enrol on the next year of study until the Resit has been completed.
 a)Exceptionally, a student may be permitted to Provisionally Progress and Resit the module in tandem with the next year of study in a maximum of 30 credits. See  for further details.
 
5.Resitting students must only be reassessed in the failed module  .
6.Where a student passes a Resit, the module mark(s) must be capped at the Pass Mark ( ).
7.Where a student fails a Resit, the higher mark from the two attempts will be recorded for the affected Component(s).
 
8.Resitting students should not attend any additional lectures, seminars or other teaching activities. They may be offered, but are not automatically entitled to, additional tutorials or supervision.
9.There must be no fee for Resitting an assessment. 
10.Resitting students should have access to UCL’s facilities such as the library and other learning resources, although there may be limited availability of some resources during UCL vacation periods.
11.Resitting students must be entitled to the Reasonable Adjustments provisions for students with disabilities and other long-term medical or mental health conditions.
12.Students should undertake a Resit before they commence a Study Abroad Year or Placement Year.
 
13.Resitting students must be reassessed under the syllabus in place at the first attempt.
14.Resitting students should be reassessed by the same Method used at the first attempt (e.g. essay, exam, practical etc.). Where a Resit by the same Method of assessment is difficult or impossible, a Board of Examiners may,  , set a different Method of reassessment. The alternative Method must:
 a)Allow students to demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes to the same extent as the original assessment, and
 b)Be approved by the External Examiner, preferably at the point of Programme and/ or Module Approval.
15.The Board of Examiners must determine whether Resitting students will be reassessed in the same Task (e.g. the same essay question) or whether a new Task will be set (e.g. a new essay question or new exam paper). Any new assessment Task must:
 a)Allow students to demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes to the same extent as the original Task, and
 b)Be approved by the External Examiner, preferably at the same time as the original Task/ paper.
16.Resitting students cannot substitute a failed module with an alternative module because the Resit includes no teaching.

9.5 Repeating a Module

1.A is a second attempt at an assessment in the following academic session with tuition and fees and with marks capped at the Pass Mark (see ).
 
2.A student who is required to Repeat must re-enrol on the failed modules in the following academic session.
3.Progressing students should not enrol on the next year of study until the Repeat has been completed.
 a)Exceptionally, a student may be permitted to and Repeat the module in tandem with the next year of study in a maximum of 30 credits. See for further details.
 
4.Repeating students must be reassessed in   of the failed module(s). 
5.Where a student Passes a Repeat, the module mark(s) must be capped at the Pass Mark ( ).
6.Where a student fails a Repeat, the marks from the Repeat attempt will be recorded.
 
7.Repeating students must re-enrol on the affected module(s), attend all teaching activities and be entitled to the standard tuition and supervision provisions on the module(s). 
8.The fees for Repeating students must be charged pro-rata to the credit value of the module(s) concerned. 
9.Repeating students must have full access to UCL’s facilities such as the library and other learning resources.
10.Repeating students must be entitled to the Reasonable Adjustments provisions for students with disabilities and other long-term medical or mental health conditions.
11.Repeating students must meet to be eligible for their Repeat attempt.
 
12.The components and/ or syllabus of the affected module(s) may be different if the programme or module has changed between years of study. Repeating students must be reassessed in the components and syllabus of the new year.
 
13. , a Repeating student may apply to substitute up to 30 credits of modules with one or more alternative modules in any one academic session, up to a maximum of 60 credits across the whole programme.
14.If a programme has changed between years of study, or a module will not be running, the Departmental Tutor may permit a student to substitute more than 30 credits per year, or more than 60 credits across the programme, with one or more alternative modules.
15.The substitute module(s) must satisfy the programme requirements in terms of credit-weighting and academic level. Students must not take modules from a subsequent year of study in advance.
16.The substitute module(s) must be treated as a second attempt and marks must be capped at the Pass Mark ( ).
17.All approved substitutions must be notified to Student Records by the Department.

9.6 Non-Modular Programmes

9.6.1 ba (hons) english.

1.A student who fails to meet the Progression and Award Requirements is subject to the standard UCL  regulations detailed above, with the following implementation:
a)Where a student fails one examination in the first year of the programme, reassessment should take the form of a Resit. 
 b)Where a student fails two or more examinations in the first year of the programme, reassessment should take the form of a Repeat. Where a Repeat is considered to be impossible, the Board of Examiners may offer the student the opportunity to take the failed assessments as Resits.
 c)The fees for Repeating Year 1 students must be charged pro-rata to the proportion of the teaching load represented by the repeat:
  i.Two papers: 66% of the fee.
  ii.Three papers: 100% of the fee.

9.6.2 BA (Hons) Fine Art 

1.A student who fails to meet the Progression and Award Requirements is subject to the standard UCL  regulations detailed above, with the following exceptions:
 a)A student who fails the final assessment of Studio Work at the end of Year 4 should Resit at the end of the following academic session. Exceptionally, the Board of Examiners may determine that the extent of failure is such that the student must Repeat the Studio Work, with tuition and fees, in the following academic session.

9.6.3 BFA (Hons) Fine Art 

 a)A student who fails the final assessment of Studio Work at the end of Year 3 should Resit at the end of the following academic session. Exceptionally, the Board of Examiners may determine that the extent of failure is such that the student must Repeat the Studio Work, with tuition and fees, in the following academic session.

9.6.4 MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery) 

 a)Pass results in individual components of the MBBS assessment are carried forward to in-year resit sittings. In years 4, 5 and 6, because of the clinical nature of these years, students who fail one or more components have the option of deferring their second attempt and repeating the full programme of study including all in-course requirements for the year, with tuition and fees, and retaking both components
 b)Students must qualify within 9 years of commencing the programme or, for UK graduate entrants with exemption from the iBSc requirement, within 8 years of commencing the programme.

9.6.5 MA Fine Art

 a)A student who fails the final assessment of Studio Work at the end of Year 2 should Resit at the end of the following academic session. Exceptionally, the Board of Examiners may determine that the extent of failure is such that the student must Repeat the Studio Work, with tuition and fees, in the following academic session.

9.6.6 MFA Fine Art in the Slade School of Fine Art

Advice for students.

Further information and advice for students about assessment is available on the  Examinations & Awards webpages .

Recent Changes

A guide to changes to the regulations are available from the  Recent Changes  page.

fail dissertation masters

Olympic Breakdancer Raygun Has PhD in Breakdancing?

Rachael gunn earned a zero in breakdancing at the paris 2024 olympic games., aleksandra wrona, published aug. 13, 2024.

Mixture

About this rating

Gunn's Ph.D. thesis, titled "Deterritorializing Gender in Sydney's Breakdancing Scene: a B-girl's Experience of B-boying," did cover the topic of breakdancing. However ...

... Gunn earned her Ph.D. in cultural studies. Moreover, a "PhD in breakdancing" does not exist as an academic discipline.

On Aug. 10, 2024, a rumor spread on social media that Rachael Gunn (also known as "Raygun"), an Australian breakdancer who competed in the 2024 Paris Olympics, had a Ph.D. in breakdancing. "This australian breakdancer has a PhD in breakdancing and dance culture and was a ballroom dancer before taking up breaking. I don't even know what to say," one X post on the topic read .

"Australian Olympic breakdancer Rachael Gunn has a PhD in breakdancing and dance culture," one X user wrote , while another asked, "Who did we send? Raygun, a 36-year-old full-time lecturer at Sydney's Macquarie University, completed a PhD in breaking culture and is a lecturer in media, creative arts, literature and language," another X user wrote .

The claim also spread on other social media platforms, such as Reddit and Instagram . 

"Is she the best break dancer? No. But I have so much respect for going on an international stage to do something you love even if you're not very skilled at it," one Instagram user commented , adding that, "And, I'm pretty sure she's using this as a research endeavor and will be writing about all our reactions to her performance. Can't wait to read it!"

In short, Gunn's Ph.D. thesis, titled "Deterritorializing Gender in Sydney's Breakdancing Scene: A B-girl's Experience of B-boying," indeed focused on the topic of breakdancing. However, Gunn earned her Ph.D. in cultural studies, not in breakdancing. Furthermore, it's important to note that a "PhD in breakdancing" does not exist as an academic discipline. 

Since Gunn's research focused on the breakdancing community, but her degree is actually in the broader field of cultural studies, we have rated this claim as a "Mixture" of truths.

Gunn "secured Australia's first ever Olympic spot in the B-Girl competition at Paris 2024 by winning the QMS Oceania Championships in Sydney, NSW, Australia," the Olympics official website informed . 

Gunn earned a zero in breakdancing at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games and clips of her routine went viral on social media, with numerous users creating memes or mocking dancer's moves. "As well as criticising her attire, social media users mocked the Australian's routine as she bounced around on stage like a kangaroo and stood on her head at times," BBC article on the topic read . 

The website of the Macquarie University informed Gunn "is an interdisciplinary and practice-based researcher interested in the cultural politics of breaking" and holds a Ph.D. in cultural studies, as well as a bachelor of arts degree (Hons) in contemporary music: 

Rachael Gunn is an interdisciplinary and practice-based researcher interested in the cultural politics of breaking. She holds a PhD in Cultural Studies (2017) and a BA (Hons) in Contemporary Music (2009) from Macquarie University. Her work draws on cultural theory, dance studies, popular music studies, media, and ethnography. Rachael is a practising breaker and goes by the name of 'Raygun'. She was the Australian Breaking Association top ranked bgirl in 2020 and 2021, and represented Australia at the World Breaking Championships in Paris in 2021, in Seoul in 2022, and in Leuven (Belgium) in 2023. She won the Oceania Breaking Championships in 2023.

Gunn's biography further revealed that she is a member of the Macquarie University Performance and Expertise Reasearch Centre, and has a range of teaching experience at undergraduate and postgraduate levels "across the areas of media, creative industries, music, dance, cultural studies, and work-integrated learning." 

Moreover, it informed her research interests included, "Breaking, street dance, and hip-hop culture; youth cultures/scenes; constructions of the dancing body; politics of gender and gender performance; ethnography; the methodological dynamics between theory and practice."

Gunn earned her Ph.D. from the Department of Media, Music, Communications, and Cultural Studies within the Faculty of Arts at Macquarie University. Below, you can find the abstract of her paper, shared by the official website of Macquarie University:

This thesis critically interrogates how masculinist practices of breakdancing offers a site for the transgression of gendered norms. Drawing on my own experiences as a female within the male-dominated breakdancing scene in Sydney, first as a spectator, then as an active crew member, this thesis questions why so few female participants engage in this creative space, and how breakdancing might be the space to displace and deterritorialise gender. I use analytic autoetthnography and interviews with scene members in collaboration with theoretical frameworks offered by Deleuze and Guttari, Butler, Bourdieu and other feminist and post-structuralist philosophers, to critically examine how the capacities of bodies are constituted and shaped in Sydney's breakdancing scene, and to also locate the potentiality for moments of transgression. In other words, I conceptualize the breaking body as not a 'body' constituted through regulations and assumptions, but as an assemblage open to new rhizomatic connections. Breaking is a space that embraces difference, whereby the rituals of the dance not only augment its capacity to deterritorialize the body, but also facilitate new possibilities for performativities beyond the confines of dominant modes of thought and normative gender construction. Consequently, this thesis attempts to contribute to what I perceive as a significant gap in scholarship on hip-hop, breakdancing, and autoethnographic explorations of Deleuze-Guattarian theory.

In a response to online criticism of her Olympics performance, Gunn wrote on her Instagram profile: "Don't be afraid to be different, go out there and represent yourself, you never know where that's gonna take you":

We have recently investigated other 2024 Paris Olympics' -related rumors, such as:

  • Lifeguards Are Present at Olympic Swimming Competitions?
  • Hobby Lobby Pulled $50M in Ads from 2024 Paris Olympics?
  • 2024 Paris Olympics Are 'Lowest-Rated' Games in Modern History?

Gunn, Rachael Louise. Deterritorializing Gender in Sydney's Breakdancing Scene: A B-Girl's Experience of B-Boying. 2022. Macquarie University, thesis. figshare.mq.edu.au, https://doi.org/10.25949/19433291.v1.

---. Deterritorializing Gender in Sydney's Breakdancing Scene: A B-Girl's Experience of B-Boying. 2022. Macquarie University, thesis. figshare.mq.edu.au, https://doi.org/10.25949/19433291.v1.

Ibrahim, Nur. "Lifeguards Are Present at Olympic Swimming Competitions?" Snopes, 8 Aug. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/lifeguards-paris-olympics-swimming/.

"Olympic Breaking: Criticism of Viral Breakdancer Rachael Gunn - Raygun - Condemned by Australia Team." BBC Sport, 10 Aug. 2024, https://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/articles/c2dgxp5n3rlo.

ORCID. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-4021. Accessed 12 Aug. 2024.

Paris 2024. https://olympics.com/en/paris-2024/athlete/-raygun_1940107. Accessed 12 Aug. 2024.

Saunders, Grant Leigh, and Rachael Gunn. "Australia." Global Hip Hop Studies, vol. 3, no. 1–2, Dec. 2023, pp. 23–32. Macquarie University, https://doi.org/10.1386/ghhs_00060_1.

Wazer, Caroline. "2024 Paris Olympics Are 'Lowest-Rated' Games in Modern History?" Snopes, 1 Aug. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/paris-olympics-lowest-rated-games/.

---. "Hobby Lobby Pulled $50M in Ads from 2024 Paris Olympics?" Snopes, 8 Aug. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/olympics-hobby-lobby-ads/.

By Aleksandra Wrona

Aleksandra Wrona is a reporting fellow for Snopes, based in the Warsaw, Poland, area.

Article Tags

Trending Topics

  • Columbia president steps down

Get JTA's Daily Briefing in your inbox

I accept the JTA Privacy Policy .

By submitting the above I agree to the privacy policy and terms of use of JTA.org

Tim Walz wrote a master’s thesis on Holocaust education, just as his own school’s approach drew criticism

A politician stands and applauds an elderly woman at a gala dinner

In Judi Agustin’s freshman year at Mankato West High School, her teacher instructed her to wear a yellow star.

It was part of a Holocaust curriculum at the school, located in a remote area of Minnesota with barely any Jews. For a week, freshmen were asked to wear the yellow stars, which were reminiscent of the ones the Nazis made the Jews wear. Seniors played the part of the Gestapo, charged with persecuting the “Jews.”

Unlike everyone else in her class in the 2001-2002 school year, Agustin was Jewish. The experience “was incredibly hurtful and offensive and scary,” she recalled on Tuesday. Her father complained to the district, and wrote a letter to the local paper decrying the lesson.

In response, she recalled, a teacher intervened. That teacher, according to her recollection: current vice presidential nominee Tim Walz.

“When Tim Walz found out about it, he squashed it real quick, and as far as I understand they never did it again,” Agustin told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. “So he was an advocate for my experience, as one of four Jewish kids in the entire school district. And I always felt like he had our back.”

A progressive favorite in Minnesota, where he is now governor, Walz is also heralded for his background as a public school educator. Lesser known is the fact that, while teaching in rural, largely white Midwestern school districts, Walz developed a particular interest in Holocaust and genocide education.

Walz is on the campaign trail this week with Vice President Kamala Harris, his running mate, and did not immediately respond to a request for comment. JTA could not independently verify that he was the teacher who stopped the Mankato West lesson.

But it’s clear that how to teach the Holocaust well has occupied Walz for decades. In 1993, while teaching in Nebraska, he was part of an inaugural conference of U.S. educators convened by the soon-to-open U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. Eight years later, after moving to Minnesota, he wrote a thesis arguing for changes in Holocaust education. And as governor, he backed a push to mandate teaching about the Holocaust in Minnesota schools.

Through it all, Walz modeled and argued for careful instruction that treated the Holocaust as one of multiple genocides worth understanding.

“Schools are teaching about the Jewish Holocaust, but the way it is traditionally being taught is not leading to increased knowledge of the causes of genocide in all parts of the world,” Walz wrote in his thesis, submitted in 2001.

The thesis was the culmination of Walz’s master’s degree focused on Holocaust and genocide education at Minnesota State University, Mankato, which he earned while teaching at Mankato West. His 27-page thesis, which JTA obtained, is titled “Improving Human Rights and Genocide Studies in the American High School Classroom.”

In it, Walz argues that the lessons of the “Jewish Holocaust” should be taught “in the greater context of human rights abuses,” rather than as a unique historical anomaly or as part of a larger unit on World War II. “To exclude other acts of genocide severely limited students’ ability to synthesize the lessons of the Holocaust and the ability to apply them elsewhere,” he wrote.

He then took a position that he noted was “controversial” among Holocaust scholars: that the Holocaust should not be taught as unique, but used to help students identify “clear patterns” with other historical genocides like the Armenian and Rwandan genocides.

Walz was describing, in effect, his own approach to teaching the Holocaust that he implemented in Alliance, Nebraska, years earlier. In the state’s remote northwest region, Walz asked his global geography class to study the common factors that linked the Holocaust to other historical genocides , including economic strife, totalitarian ideology and colonialism. The year was 1993. At year’s end, Walz and his class correctly predicted that Rwanda was most at risk of sliding into genocide.

“The Holocaust is taught too often purely as a historical event, an anomaly, a moment in time,” Walz Told the New York Times in 2008, reflecting on those Alliance lessons. “That relieves us of responsibility. Obviously, the mastermind was sociopathic, but on the scale for it to happen, there had to be a lot of people in the country who chose to go down that path.”

In his thesis, he noted that he intended to bring this curriculum to the Mankato school district as a “sample unit.” But another kind of lesson was unfolding there at the same time.

For years at Mankato West, high school students had been engaged in a peculiar lesson that was, all the same, not unusual for its time: In an effort to teach students who had never met a Jewish person what it might have been like to live under the Nazis, teachers had them role play.

For a week, freshmen wore the yellow stars, and seniors playing the Gestapo were given permission to torment them.

Such lessons had been going on since at least the 1990s, recalled Leah Solo, a Jewish student who graduated from Mankato West in 1998. For Solo, these lessons weren’t so bad.

“People knew I was Jewish, people knew to be sensitive around me,” Solo told JTA. Her teacher, who was not Walz and whom she liked, “was doing his best to try to teach a really hard subject to folks who had no idea. Most of these kids had never met a Jew before.” In her senior year she was given the choice of whether she wanted to play a Nazi or another kind of role, and chose the latter.

Things were different by the time Agustin took the class several years later. By then, the Holocaust role-playing wasn’t just limited to the confines of the classroom.

“They could come up to you in the lunchroom,” recalled Anne Heintz, a fellow student at the time. Local students whispered about the lesson before they got to high school, she said.

One senior, in Agustin’s recollection, got violent and started shoving the “Jewish” freshmen into lockers.

Outraged, her father wrote a letter to the local newspaper, and some parents complained to the school district. Agustin left the high school after her sophomore year. None of this happened in Walz’s classroom, according to the students, and Heintz recalled that the lessons had ended by the time she graduated in 2004.

“I’m not sure what his involvement was. I know it just ended,” Heintz, who is not Jewish, told JTA. “He was teaching at the time it ended.”

JTA could not verify whether Walz knew about the lessons, which had been going on for years, before they were stopped. A spokesperson for the high school told JTA they “don’t have any information” on the details of the lessons, but noted, “When Governor Walz was at Mankato West High School he was primarily a Global Geography Teacher and Football Coach. Subjects such as the Holocaust were taught in history courses.”

Agustin’s father, Stewart Ross, told JTA that he did not recall Walz being involved. Neither did Bob Ihrig, one of the teachers who taught the lesson as part of a World War II unit. He said it continued in a limited, classroom-only version until his retirement in 2014.

Ross, Ihrig and all three Mankato West High students spoke highly of Walz as a teacher and community leader, though only one, Heintz, actually had him in the classroom.

“What I remember most is, he always made all the subjects that we talked about super engaging,” she said. “It always seemed like he was able to make a subject really exciting for folks and really engage everyone in class. And I think that is part of how he speaks now that he’s on a national stage as well.”

Solo, who had Walz’s wife Gwen for a different class, took a student trip led by the couple to China, where Tim Walz taught for a year early in his career. She recalled how, in 2004, Walz stood up for her when she was working with John Kerry’s presidential campaign and security for a George W. Bush rally tried to boot them from the premises.

“When security also tried to kick him out, he was like, ‘I am a former Teacher of the Year who just returned from being deployed. I don’t think you want to kick me out,’” Solo recalled, describing an incident that made local news at the time. “And then after the rally, he came and signed up to volunteer with the Kerry campaign, because he did not appreciate that.”

Volunteering with Kerry’s campaign led directly to Walz’s entrance into politics . Solo would go on to work for Walz’s congressional campaigns.

Walz stuck with teaching as he began his political career; when he was elected to represent Mankato in 2006, he was the only active educator in Congress.

Last year, as Minnesota’s governor, Walz returned to Holocaust education, and supported and signed a law requiring the state’s middle and high schools to teach about the Holocaust. The law, initiated and championed by the Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas, also encourages schools to teach about other genocides. A working group for the curriculum hit snags earlier this summer when a pro-Palestinian activist was removed from the committee amid debates on whether Israel’s conduct in Gaza constitutes genocide.

The mandate is still anticipated to go into effect in the 2025-2026 school year. “This is going to work out, this is going to be good, because the governor and his staff are highly attuned to the concerns and sensitivities of the Jewish community,” Ethan Roberts, the JCRC’s deputy executive director, told JTA.

Speaking at a JCRC event in June, Walz said he had been “privileged and proud” to have participated in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum training early in his career. But he said more needed to be done, and he emphasized that the curriculum chosen to accomplish the requirement would determine its success.

“We need to do better on Holocaust education. We need to do better on ethnic studies,” he told the crowd. “And I tell you this as a teacher and as governor, too, we don’t need test scores or anything to tell us that we’re failing.”

It was the kind of message that former Mankato West students said they came to expect from him.

“He is what you hope a great teacher is,” said Solo, “which is someone who’s not only teaching, but also learning at all times.”

With additional reporting by Jackie Hajdenberg. 

Correction and updates (Aug. 8): This story has been corrected to remove a reference to Tim Walz as department chair. It has also been updated to reflect additional sources about Holocaust instruction at Mankato West High School.

Share this:

Recommended from jta.

Kamala Harris Democratic National Convention

Israel, Gaza and Josh Shapiro: What we’re watching for during the Democratic National Convention

fail dissertation masters

Barbra Streisand, Susie Essman and 30,000 others join ‘Jewish women for Kamala’ call

fail dissertation masters

Pittsburgh Jewish groups hope to quash a referendum that would force the city to boycott Israel

fail dissertation masters

In speech about antisemitism, Trump blames Harris and focuses on anti-Israel forces

Rabbi Angela Buchdahl

Nearly 100 US rabbis and cantors urge Netanyahu to finalize deal to free remaining hostages

fail dissertation masters

Tel Aviv’s ‘Hostage Square’ is coming to Chicago for the DNC — whether or not a pro-Israel march gets a permit

CrowdStrike's president accepting the 'most epic fail' award in person was a PR masterclass, experts say

  • CrowdStrike's president just accepted an award for "most epic fail" after a mass IT outage.
  • The outage, caused by a defective software update, disrupted thousands of Microsoft systems.
  • Experts praised the company's transparency and accountability, seeing it as a PR win.

Insider Today

CrowdStrike's president himself just collected an award for the "most epic fail" following the company's mass IT outage.

The cybersecurity firm's president, Michael Sentonas, said he wanted to receive the award in person because the company aimed to own its mistake.

"I want every CrowdStriker who comes to work to see it," Sentonas said while collecting the trophy. "Because, you know, our goal is to protect people, and we got this wrong and I want to make sure that everybody understands these things can't happen."

The award was presented on Saturday night at the Pwnie Awards , an annual award ceremony for cybersecurity professionals.

The ignominious accolade follows an outage last month in which CrowdStrike disrupted businesses globally after a defect in a software update from the cybersecurity firm caused many thousands of Microsoft computer systems to shut down.

Sentonas' short speech elicited applause and laughter from the audience, and communications experts told Business Insider that accepting the award graciously was the right move.

One crisis-communications expert said that showing up in person helped the company signal that it's still committed to transparency and accountability.

"Sentonas' decision to accept the award in person is perceptually a PR win and a master class in crisis management ," Jeremy Foo, the CEO of the public-relations firm Elliot & Co., said.

"What could have potentially been remembered as a PR nightmare is now trending for the right narrative," he said.

The award shows "that even tech giants are not immune to missteps, and treating them with humility and integrity, and just the right touch of humor, can earn brand love," he added.

Related stories

CrowdStrike accepting the @PwnieAwards for “most epic fail” at @defcon . Class act. pic.twitter.com/e7IgYosHAE — Dominic White 👾 (@singe) August 10, 2024

Admitting a mistake is usually the first step in addressing a crisis. This acknowledgment should authentically convey contrition to those affected by your actions, Nathan Miller, a Los Angeles communications strategist, said.

The humor of the moment also served as an opportunity to illustrate how seriously CrowdStrike was taking its mistake, Miller said.

While the award ceremony may temporarily repair the company's image, customers will pay attention to what CrowdStrike does in the long term.

"Customers and partners who form CrowdStrike's core stakeholders will want to see that the outage is taken seriously," Foo said. "The key here is consistency."

fail dissertation masters

  • Main content

This discussion is now closed.

  • Avice regarding postgraduate
  • Could self taught Masters degrees be possible?
  • Failed assignment at Master's level UK
  • Masters, what to do if failed?
  • Oxford Master Grading and Progression
  • Failed Postgraduate Degree
  • Masters dissertation: failed my resubmission
  • Some questions about failing a master
  • Exam re-takes
  • Failed dissertation for misconduct
  • A Day in the Life of a Nutrition and Health Student at the University of Roehampton
  • capped mark of zero
  • University does not allow me to choose my dissertation topic
  • Question regarding special circumstances and degree classification
  • As a prospective Master's student, should I do a dissertation in undergrad?
  • Will my dissertation grade stop me from getting onto a masters
  • What is a service based dissertation?
  • Can I do a Msc Psychology conversion with a third class honours?
  • Submitting dissertation without feedback
  • Master's Dissertation Participants

failed masters dissertation?

Scroll to see replies

Avatar for 455409

Related discussions

Last reply 3 minutes ago

Last reply 5 hours ago

Last reply 8 hours ago

Last reply 1 day ago

Last reply 2 days ago

Last reply 3 days ago

Last reply 4 days ago

Last reply 5 days ago

Last reply 1 week ago

Last reply 2 weeks ago

Articles for you

Terms and conditions

Finding a university place in Ucas Clearing 2024: 10 top tips to help you get ready

Finding a university place in Ucas Clearing 2024: 10 top tips to help you get ready

Top 10 tips for Ucas Clearing 2024

Bringing business people into the classroom: what students learn from industry professionals

Bringing business people into the classroom: what students learn from industry professionals

Get the Reddit app

Got a question about going to uni in the UK? Want to find out more and speak to others about their course/uni? Not sure if you can eat something that's been loafing in your fridge for 3 weeks, and gone a dubious shade of purple-green? This is the place for you. If you want to post a survey for your dissertation, please make sure your post includes all information required by the rules linked in our wiki!

*Urgent help* What happens if I fail my Masters dissertation

To cut a long story short, recently my life has gone to shit. My mental health is at the lowest it has been and everything is just going wrong for my. Due to this, I have been able to do little for my dissertation. If push comes to shove I guess I could submit something however it would be well under the word count and absolutely rubbish. I've tried reaching out for help from my university, gp etc. but so far have got little back. I've applied for an extension however I really doubt that I'll hear back in time.

Does anyone know what will happen if I fail my dissertation or any advice they could give me. Dissertation is due next week and right now I see little chance of me finishing it. Thank you to anyone who reads this.

By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .

Enter the 6-digit code from your authenticator app

You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.

Enter a 6-digit backup code

Create your username and password.

Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.

Reset your password

Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password

Check your inbox

An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account

Choose a Reddit account to continue

Location
City:  Vatulino, Moskovskaya, Russian Federation (Russia)
Name:Vatulino Airport
ICAO:

Details
Type:Airport (Aerodrome, Airfield)
Latitude: 55�39'45"N (55.662500)
Longitude: 36�08'18"E (36.138333)
Variation:11.72�E (WMM2020 magnetic declination)
0.14� annual change

Related Locations
Nearby:
Farthest:

Find:

   beyond  
but within
  

Copyright © 2004-2024 . All rights reserved.
The Great Circle Mapper name and logo are trademarks of the .
All other trademarks mentioned herein belong to their respective owners.
Please see for attributions and further copyright information.

     

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

What percentage of PhD theses are rejected nowadays?

What percentage of PhD theses (e.g., physics ones) are rejected nowadays? And why?

Geremia's user avatar

  • 1 Probably varies widely by department, location, etc. You shouldn't have to narrow it down, but might you want to? –  Nick Stauner Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 4:43
  • 33 What do you mean by "rejected"? For example, that a thesis defense takes place but the student fails and leaves graduate school without a Ph.D.? What if the student fails but is told to try again later after doing a little more work? What about a student who thinks he/she should graduate but whose thesis committee disagrees and won't schedule a defense? You might be able to find statistics for failed defenses, but by itself that data may not tell you much. (My impression is that most borderline theses never make it to the defense.) –  Anonymous Mathematician Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 8:49
  • 11 At many universities (my experience is exclusively EU-centric) there are at least two self-censorship filters before it comes to a defense. Firstly, and most importantly, it's the thesis supervisor who must approve your manuscript as defensible. Secondly, you often also need a dean's approval for moving on towards an actual defense. There are many theses which do not make it through these safeguard filters on their first attempt, but if the system works, you almost never see an officially failed defense/rejected thesis. Hence the numbers on the actual "failure rate" do not really exist. –  walkmanyi Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 10:20
  • 3 @walkmanyi Same for Austria and Switzerland. I have never heard of somebody 'failing' their defense (that would be an affront against the advisor just as much as against the student), but certainly there are people that just never finish their PhD. I would say, in my group drop-out rate was around 25% - 33%, but I never bothered to count. –  xLeitix Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 13:26
  • 2 In some graduate schools (e.g. the one I'm confronted with at Harvard), one factor is the 'qualifying exam'. I know of someone with a good publication record, whose adviser think she/he perfectly qualifies for the PhD, and who failed her/his qualifying exam. No PhD for that person, although the quality of the work far exceeds the one of the average thesis I have seen in the field. –  Cape Code Commented Feb 12, 2015 at 13:48

2 Answers 2

I'm only personally aware of one student who failed his PhD defense (this is at an R1 US university). After his advisor refused to approve his thesis, he went over his head and got the department chair to schedule the defense anyway. Results were predictable.

On the other hand, "major revisions" are very common, especially, I hear, in the humanities (in engineering, it's far more common to receive token feedback -- if the committee reads the thesis at all! -- than demands for substantial changes).

Outright failing a student during a defense is an extreme embarassment, for the department, for the PhD committee, for the advisor, and of course for the student, so there is every incentive to ensure that a thesis that goes to defense will pass. Moreover, since most theses these days are compilations of previously-published work, it is very easy to tell well in advance if the student is expected to pass.

So if an advisor has doubts about the quality of a student's thesis, he will either ask the student to spend more time improving it, or "suggest" the student start looking for jobs in industry.

user168715's user avatar

Very small, as every failed PhD defence is also a shame for the professor. As a result, the professor will not allow to proceed with defence of the really weak work. And he will listen for other professors that would usually tell in advance they think to vote against.

Hence, most likely, the following will happen:

  • If a PhD student just does not work enough, the professor will not allow to continue studies after some time.
  • If a PhD student is mad with some own theory or topic that academic community unlikely to accept, the professor will not allow to defend such a work.
  • If it is really a bad luck with your topic, the professor will change the topic.
  • If the professor has made a strategic mistake and your diligent work does not give results that could be published in a good journal, the professor should normally try to publish anyway in less reputable sources, good enough for PhD defence.

The PhD supervisor is more interested in your success than a lecturer is interested in the progress of the student. Same professor that writes low grades with relatively little attention (as long as he is sure the student deserves) will spend more time when acting as a PhD supervisor, will try to help, will try to fix the topic. This is because PhD project is also his research project. And who would want ones research project to fail? Of course, the professor tries to find a good PhD student for his project, or, if this was not successful, at least to fire lazy or uncooperative student in the first year. But this is way before the actual PhD defence.

If to ask differently, how many PhD students do not get they degree at the end, this really depends a lot on the traditions inside the institution. However in all places I have seen this was below 20 % or about. The first post doctoral position is also seldom a problem.

The next serious threshold you will need to pass is the professor position or at least a permanent researcher position, if you want to stay in science.

algorithmic_fungus's user avatar

  • 2 Can you provide a link to a university that requires the advisor to approve the thesis before being submitted. In my experience this is not how it works in the US or UK. –  StrongBad Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 14:14
  • 6 Regardless of the rules, it is very uncommon to go to defence against the will of the supervisor, and you really cannot expect to pass if you are in such a conflict, at least in European system. I have seen cases in Germany, Switzerland and Lithuania. –  algorithmic_fungus Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 14:23
  • 2 To say differently, if the supervisor thinks you will pass, you will most likely pass. And, with the help of your supervisor, it should not be extremely difficult to bring your PhD into good shape. The PhD supervisor is more interested in your success than a lecturer is interested in the progress of the student. But if you are in a conflict instead, chances to succeed are minor. For such a case, I would suggest to change the supervisor instead, even if this would mean changing the university as well. –  algorithmic_fungus Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 14:52
  • 1 @DanielE.Shub: just a quick example of a university requiring an approval of a thesis supervisor before engaging a panel of examiners/reviewers: TU Delft. See article 18.2 (pg. 24), as well as the formal process description (row 6 in table pg. 8) in the TU Delft doctorate regulations . –  walkmanyi Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 15:26
  • 1 In short. Trust your supervisors. If you have a good relationship with them (or even a bad one honestly), and they think you will pass, then you will almost certainly pass. If: you go over your supervisors head, your supervisors have been sub-par or not supportive, your supervisors have not thoroughly read your thesis, then you have more cause for concern. –  DryLabRebel Commented Jun 19, 2021 at 2:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for browse other questions tagged phd thesis science ..

  • Featured on Meta
  • Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
  • We've made changes to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - July 2024
  • Announcing a change to the data-dump process

Hot Network Questions

  • Is Cohort level hard capped?
  • Is there a "simplest" way to embed a graph in 3-space?
  • Why is Bangladesh considered significantly more corrupt than India and Pakistan by the World Bank/Brookings WGI?
  • What is this houseplant with a red fleshy stem and thick waxy leaves?
  • Does the expansion of space imply anything about the dimensionality of the Universe?
  • Is there a French noun equivalent for "twofer"?
  • Referencing colored item
  • "Heads cut off" or "souls cut off" in Rev 20:4?
  • Questions about best way to raise the handlebar on my bike
  • How to cite a book if only its chapters have DOIs?
  • Has anybody replaced a LM723 for a ua723 and experienced problems with drift and oscillations
  • I submitted a paper and later realised one reference was missing, although I had written the authors in the body text. What could happen?
  • QGIS selecting multiple features per each feature, based on attribute value of each feature
  • How do you "stealth" a relativistic superweapon?
  • How to turn 2 images, last frame and overlay, into a 5 second end-roll using FFmpeg?
  • What was the reason for not personifying God's spirit in NABRE's translation of John 14:17?
  • Age is just a number!
  • Does the First Amendment protect deliberately publicizing the incorrect date for an election?
  • How to invoke italic correction in ConTeXt LMTX?
  • Many and Many of - a subtle difference in meaning?
  • Trace operation as contraction - how can we contract only contravariant indices?
  • Function for listing processes holding a specified file open
  • Has technology regressed in the Alien universe?
  • How would a culture living in an extremely vertical environment deal with dead bodies?

fail dissertation masters

Nicest Suburbs

Khimki, Moscow Oblast, Russia

fail dissertation masters

Khimki is a city located in Moscow Oblast, Russia, which is situated about 23 kilometers northwest of Moscow. It is one of the most significant industrial centers in the region and has a population of approximately 253,000 inhabitants as of 2021. The city is connected to Moscow by the Moscow-St. Petersburg highway and the Moscow Central Circle railway.

One of the most beautiful areas in Khimki is the historical center, which is known for its well-preserved buildings from the 19th and 20th centuries. The area is home to the City Hall and the City History Museum, as well as several beautiful parks and green spaces. The housing prices in this area are on the higher end due to the historic charm and central location. The average price for a one-bedroom apartment in the historical center is around 50,000 rubles (about $675) per month. The transportation is convenient with several bus and minibus routes connecting the area to the rest of the city. This area is generally safe, with low crime rates.

Another area worth mentioning is the recently developed residential district of Yaroslavsky. It is located in the eastern part of the city and is known for its modern and comfortable living spaces. The area has a large park with several playgrounds, bike paths, and sports fields. The housing prices in this area are more affordable compared to the historical center, with the average rent for a one-bedroom apartment being around 30,000 rubles (about $400) per month. The transportation is also convenient, with several bus routes connecting the area to the rest of the city. The safety of this area is also high, with low crime rates.

The Sokolniki neighborhood is also a popular residential area in Khimki. It is located in the southwestern part of the city and is known for its green spaces, which include several parks and forests. The housing prices in this area are slightly higher than in Yaroslavsky, with the average rent for a one-bedroom apartment being around 35,000 rubles (about $470) per month. The transportation is convenient, with several bus and minibus routes connecting the area to the rest of the city. The safety of this area is also high, with low crime rates.

Khimki is known for its diverse industry, which includes metalworking, chemicals, and construction materials. The city has several large industrial plants, such as the Sheremetyevo International Airport, which is one of the busiest airports in Russia. The city also has several shopping centers and entertainment complexes, such as the MEGA Khimki Mall, which is one of the largest malls in the region.

The people of Khimki are known for their love of sports, with football, ice hockey, and basketball being the most popular. The city has several sports clubs, such as the Khimki Basketball Club, which is one of the most successful basketball teams in Russia. The city also has several well-known public figures, such as the musician and composer Andrey Makarevich, who is known for his work with the band Mashina Vremeni.

Khimki is a beautiful city with a rich history and culture. The city has several outstanding areas, each with its own unique charm and character. The housing prices in the city are generally affordable, and the transportation is convenient, making it a great place to live. The city is known for its diverse industry, sports, and entertainment options, making it a great place to work and play.

IMAGES

  1. What Happens If You Fail Your Dissertation? Guide by Experts

    fail dissertation masters

  2. What Happens When You Fail Your Dissertation?

    fail dissertation masters

  3. Top 10 Ways to Fail a Master’s Dissertation: An Alternative Guide to

    fail dissertation masters

  4. Can You Fail a PhD Dissertation?

    fail dissertation masters

  5. What Happens If You Fail Your Dissertation?

    fail dissertation masters

  6. How Bad Does a Dissertation Have to Be to Fail?

    fail dissertation masters

COMMENTS

  1. I realize I made a huge mistake in my thesis and am not sure what to do

    @jrh My program uses the thesis as mostly a learning experience for the most part. They didn't expect for me to have made 0 methodological mistakes, but my committee pointed them out and discussed them with me. That being said, there are people who have failed during the proposal if their project is especially unoriginal and basic.

  2. What to do if I cannot complete my Masters dissertation tasks?

    Aug 27, 2014 at 9:45. 4. I agree with scaaahu here. If your work is not good enough for a dissertation, you cannot present something that is not good enough. So, an extension is the only thing you can do. - Alexandros. Aug 27, 2014 at 10:14. 11. Next time, ask for help much sooner.

  3. The common pitfalls of failed dissertations and how to steer clear of

    The majority of failed Ph.D. dissertations are sloppily presented. They contain typos, grammatical mistakes, referencing errors and inconsistencies in presentation. Looking at some committee reports randomly, I note the following comments: "The thesis is poorly written.". "That previous section is long, badly written and lacks structure.".

  4. How would one fail a master thesis defense?

    The three most common reasons include: Did not show up to defend the thesis (AKA: Lose on walkover) Doesn't know the material of the thesis (AKA: Didn't write it) Unable to hold a discussion about the thesis (AKA: hid in a corner) Note that unlike a PhD thesis the professor does not have lot of skin in the game.

  5. What Happens if You Fail Your Dissertation?

    If you fail your undergraduate dissertation, you can still graduate as long as you have enough credits, although this may be with an ordinary degree. However, if you fail your master's dissertation or PhD thesis resubmission, you will not be allowed to graduate. The topic of failure is quite daunting for most students.

  6. What Happens If You Fail Your Dissertation?

    When it comes to Ph.D., the dissertation failure rate is about 40% to 50% which increases the thoughts of what happens if you fail dissertation. Some don't even make it to their final defense and are rejected over their proposal presentation. And gets in the list of fail dissertation UK professors manage.

  7. What EXACTLY Happens if You Fail Your Dissertation Project?

    If you fail your dissertation project, your institution will give you another chance to redo the work and re-submit it based on an agreed date. However, you institution will cap the marks for a resubmitted dissertation at a pass level. Notably, it's highly unlikely for students to fail their dissertations straight outright.

  8. I failed my dissertation defense. But I am not a failure

    Lorie Owens, or PhDiva (@Dissertating) as she is commonly known in academic Twitter circles, paints a vivid picture of how she failed at her first dissertation defense. This narrative originally…

  9. Thesis Examination Failures

    Thesis Examination Failures. If one or both of the examiners give the thesis an outcome of 'not passed' on the examination report, a Master's student will not graduate and a Doctoral candidate will not proceed to the oral defence. However, the student has the option to revise and resubmit a failed thesis. When the examiner's report is ...

  10. Failed my Masters thesis : r/GradSchool

    Second, remind yourself - of what you said "I failed a MASTERS THESIS". You are a champ. Stuff happens, that's life. But you have to fail sometime, and reflecting on where you can improve might help you focus, and nail it the next time around, and keep the momentum going.

  11. Section 9: Consequences of Failure

    Have failed to meet specific, essential Professional, Statutory or Regulatory Body requirements as approved by UCL Education Committee or its nominee and recorded in the Portico Progression and Award Rules Tool, or ... Masters Dissertations/ Research Projects: January-start programmes: By 30 April of the following academic session. 3 ...

  12. What happens if you fail your thesis defence? : r/GradSchool

    Once they reach 2 failures, they are kicked out of the program. If you fail your oral defense, that's one failure. Typically students are given a list of revisions, elements to fix/redo, etc. They can then take it again the next semester. If you fail it twice, you are out.

  13. What we know about military records of Walz and Vance

    Walz's military record has been under scrutiny after a series of claims made by veterans and leading Republicans.

  14. Olympic Breakdancer Raygun Has PhD in Breakdancing?

    What's True. Gunn's Ph.D. thesis, titled "Deterritorializing Gender in Sydney's Breakdancing Scene: a B-girl's Experience of B-boying," did cover the topic of breakdancing.

  15. Tim Walz wrote a master's thesis on Holocaust education, just as his

    The thesis was the culmination of Walz's master's degree focused on Holocaust and genocide education at Minnesota State University, Mankato, which he earned while teaching at Mankato West. His ...

  16. Tim Walz's Class Project on the Holocaust Draws New Attention Online

    Several years later, when he was studying for his master's degree in experiential education at Minnesota State University, Mankato, Mr. Walz wrote his thesis on Holocaust education, the Jewish ...

  17. The Australian Professor Who Turned Breaking on Its Head

    Breaking made its debut as an Olympic sport Friday, and among the competitors was Dr. Rachael Gunn, also known as B-girl Raygun, a 36-year-old professor from Sydney, Australia, who stood out in ...

  18. Stuck without progress working on thesis

    I am constantly worried about what if i fail. What will happen. Should I have to go back to India without completing my Master's. Update 28.09.2020: Thanks a lot. I have passed my Thesis as well as my masters with satisfactory Noten(Grade). Over all 2.5 Noten for my Master Degree and 2.5(average of Report and Presentation) .

  19. How many masters thesis defences actually fail? : r/GradSchool

    Normally the your advicer and the examinator should never allow you to submit if you're not going to make it. The case above was a one time thing and everyone involved was to blame. In reality, failed grad students are reflected by the number of drop outs. Around 50% never make it in Sweden.

  20. CrowdStrike Just Pulled Off Crisis-Communications Master Class With

    CrowdStrike's president just accepted an award for "most epic fail" after a mass IT outage. The outage, caused by a defective software update, disrupted thousands of Microsoft systems. Experts ...

  21. How Liverpool managers start their reigns

    Roy Hodgson's tenure (2010) seemed doomed as soon as he failed to mention any Liverpool legends after being asked for his biggest coaching influences (a Londoner, he named Don Howe, the former ...

  22. Raygun: Australian breaker earns mixed reviews, praised for 'courage

    She failed to register a point in her battles against USA's Logistx, France's Syssy and Lithuania's Nicka, losing 18-0 on each occasion. ... while her PhD thesis focused on the intersection ...

  23. Failed my Master's dissertation twice. Any advice?

    Duncan2012. 19. You need to read the academic regulations of the university to see whether you think you have grounds for a complaint, appeal or some other action. There would be a lot to factor in and there's no way any of us here on TSR will be able to give constructive advice without knowing the whole story.

  24. failed masters dissertation?

    and did my dissertation in 5 days, about 5 hours/day. That doesn't add up. You might pass, you might not - it depends upon your actual ability. If you were doing a Masters in time management you would have failed straight away, however depending on your course and how good you are at it - you could pass.

  25. When can a thesis get rejected or asked for a major revision?

    Resubmit - this thesis does not pass, but contains sufficient material to convince the examiners you are capable of passing. You are giving leave to rewrite and resubmit the thesis. May involve new experiments - often 1 year time limit. Fail (either with or without a Master of Philosophy degree).

  26. Khimki Map

    Khimki. Khimki is a mid-sized city in North Moscow Oblast, adjacent to Moscow, with a prominent historical role in the Soviet aerospace industry, some very large upscale shopping malls, and fast-growing residential districts for Muscovite commuters. Photo: Alexander0807, Public domain. Ukraine is facing shortages in its brave fight to survive.

  27. *Urgent help* What happens if I fail my Masters dissertation

    speak to your student union/association for advice. speak to student services urgently. It's very possible your institution will either a) allow you a significant extension (and you don't need to hear back before the deadline to be able to make use of that) and/or b) offer you a resit opportunity for the dissertation.

  28. UUMV

    Airport information about UUMV - Vatulino [Vatulino Airport], MOS, RU

  29. thesis

    But this is way before the actual PhD defence. If to ask differently, how many PhD students do not get they degree at the end, this really depends a lot on the traditions inside the institution. However in all places I have seen this was below 20 % or about. The first post doctoral position is also seldom a problem.

  30. Nicest Suburbs

    Khimki is a city located in Moscow Oblast, Russia, which is situated about 23 kilometers northwest of Moscow. It is one of the most significant industrial centers in the region and has a population of approximately 253,000 inhabitants as of 2021. The city is connected to Moscow by the Moscow-St. Petersburg highway and the Moscow Central Circle ...